DOCSLIB.ORG

Supporting the Single Market Beyond 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supporting the Single Market Beyond 2020 BRIEFING EU Legislation in Progress 2021-2027 MFF Supporting the single market beyond 2020 OVERVIEW The single market programme is a new, dedicated €3.7 billion (in 2018 prices) or €4.2 billion (in current prices) programme for the 2021-2027 period supporting the single market. It is particularly aimed at empowering and protecting consumers, and enabling Europe's many small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs) to take better advantage of a well-functioning single market. On 3 May 2021, the Regulation establishing the programme entered into force, with retroactive application from 1 January 2021. The new programme aims to strengthen and streamline the governance of the EU's internal market. It will support the competitiveness of enterprises, and promote human, animal and plant health and a safe food chain, as well as financing European statistics to provide reliable data relevant to the single market. The proposal consolidates and streamlines a wide range of activities that were previously financed separately, and bundles them into one programme. The aim is to create benefits in terms of flexibility, simplification and synergies, and eliminate overlaps. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the programme for single market, competitiveness of enterprises, including small and medium-sized enterprises, and European statistics and repealing Regulations (EU) No 99/2013, (EU) No 1287/2013, (EU) No 254/2014, (EU) No 258/2014, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) 2017/826 Committee responsible: Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) COM(2018) 441 Rapporteur: Brando Benifei (S&D, Italy) 7.6.2018 Shadow rapporteurs: Arba Kokalari (EPP, Sweden) 2018/0231(COD) Sandro Gozi (Renew, France) Ordinary legislative Virginie Joron (ID, France) procedure (COD) David Cormand (Greens/EFA, France) (Parliament and Eugen Jurzyca (ECR, Slovakia) Council on equal Kateřina Konečná (The Left, Czechia) footing – formerly 'co-decision') Procedure completed. Regulation (EU) 2021/690 OJ L 153, 3.5.2021, pp. 1-48 EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Author: Marcin Szczepański Members' Research Service PE 628.237 – June 2021 EN EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service Introduction The single market was launched 25 years ago, and allows the free movement of people, goods, services and capital between the European Union's Member States. Today, it is the largest market in the world, with close to 500 million European citizens and 24 million companies. It generates €14 trillion in annual gross domestic product (GDP) while trade in goods alone accounts for a quarter of the EU's total GDP and constitutes nearly a sixth of global trade in goods. However, despite the adoption and implementation of over 3 500 measures, the single market project is far from finished, rather it is constantly evolving, taking into account changing circumstances and emerging challenges and obstacles. Many barriers, such as gaps in legislation, administrative burdens, ineffective implementation and poor enforcement of EU law, continue to stand in the way of the EU unleashing the full potential of a genuine European market in which there are no differences between operating nationally and at EU level. The benefits to be reaped are significant – a study by the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) shows that as much as €615 billion annually, representing 4.4 % of EU GDP, could be gained by full delivery of the single market in the areas of free movement of goods and services and public procurement, and in relation to consumer laws. Consequently, further market integration was one of the Juncker Commission's main priorities, pursued principally by means of the single market and digital single market strategies as well as the capital markets union action plan. It is also supported by the Council and the European Parliament, which have both called on numerous occasions for improvement in the governance and efficiency of the single market. To achieve this in times of budgetary constraint, the Commission sees the need to identify potential synergies and eliminate the overlaps in EU policies, as well as the necessity to address the complexity of the many existing tools and programmes. It therefore proposed to create a dedicated single market programme in the next long-term EU budget framework, which will bring many activities together into a more coherent framework. Context The single market programme was proposed as part of the 2021-2027 multiannual financial framework (MFF). The expenditure side of the next long-term EU budget proposed by the Commission totals €1 134 583 million in commitments and €1 104 805 million in payments (in 2018 prices), equivalent to 1.11 %, and 1.08 % of the EU-27's gross national income (GNI) respectively.1 There are differences between the structures of the future and 2014-2020 MFF. The number of headings has risen from five to seven, and some programmes have shifted between headings. Furthermore, the number of programmes has been reduced from 58 to 37. One EPRS analysis finds that the 'headings chosen by the Commission show a move away from the current nomenclature based on the Europe 2020 strategy, such as "smart and inclusive growth", towards other EU priorities, such as the digital economy, migration, border management and defence. This shift in priorities can be seen in the choices made to increase or decrease funding: increases are most visible in the areas of research and innovation, support for investment, migration and border management, and security and defence. Cuts have mainly fallen on cohesion policy and the EU's Common Agricultural Policy. Instruments outside the MFF have generally been boosted and the rules adapted to afford the EU more flexibility within its seven-year financial plan'. The single market programme has been included under heading 1: 'Single Market, innovation and digital', which constitutes almost 15 % of the MFF. The heading's biggest components are Horizon Europe (currently Horizon 2020), with €86.6 billion (up by 29 %), the Connecting Europe Facility, with €21.7 billion, the European Space Programme, with a budget of €14.2 billion (up by 26 %) and the InvestEU fund, with €13 billion. 2 Supporting the single market beyond 2020 Existing situation Current financing of the single market involves a mix of programmes and budget lines. A harmonised and coordinated framework such as the proposed single market programme does not exist. The areas financed under existing programmes include the competitiveness of enterprises, interoperability solutions, statistics on Europe, financial reporting and auditing, consumer protection, customers and end-users in financial services, policy-making in financial services and safety of the food chain. The areas financed under several budget lines deal with the following: internal market, its governance and standardisation, and the competitiveness of SMEs: implementation and development of the internal market for financial services; company law; operation and development of the internal market for goods and services, customs and tax policy development.2 These actions and programmes amount to nearly €6 billion under the 2014-2020 funding framework. Furthermore, as compared to the baseline in 2014, the Commission has undertaken a number of new commitments during the 2014-2020 MFF that will also need to be financed under the next MFF. These include the health technology assessment, mutual recognition and market surveillance, procurement strategy and the ex-ante assessment mechanism, the single digital gateway, the type approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles, the new deal for consumers, the action plan to finance sustainable growth,3 and initiatives to empower competition authorities.4 These actions are estimated to amount to €315 million in the next MMF. The following legislative acts are to be superseded by the proposal: the 2014-2020 consumer programme, the COSME 2014-2020 programme for the competitiveness of enterprises and SMEs, the European statistical programme 2013-2017, the programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing 2014-2020, the management of expenditure relating to the food chain, animal health, animal welfare, plant health and plant reproductive material 2014-2020, and the programme to support specific activities enhancing the involvement of consumers and other financial services end-users in Union policy-making in the area of financial services 2017-2020. Parliament's starting position In its resolution of 14 March 2018 on preparing the Parliament's position on the post-2020 MFF, the European Parliament asked for the COSME budget to be doubled to correspond to the actual needs of the economy and the high demand for participation. Members of the European Parliament called for a 'greater concentration of budgetary resources in areas that demonstrate a clear European added value and stimulate economic growth, competitiveness, sustainability and employment across all EU regions'. The resolution also sees the need for genuine simplification of the EU budgetary system in the next MFF, with the aim in particular of facilitating fund absorption. The Parliament also highlighted the need to reduce unnecessary overlaps between instruments that serve similar types of action, for example in the areas of innovation and SMEs. Parliament underlined that this should be done 'without running the risk of losing important elements of the different programmes, and the necessity of eliminating
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Deal – the Coordinators
    Green Deal – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”I want the European Green Deal to become Europe’s hallmark. At the heart of it is our commitment to becoming the world’s first climate-neutral continent. It is also a long-term economic imperative: those who act first European Parliament and fastest will be the ones who grasp the opportunities from the ecological transition. I want Europe to be 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 the front-runner. I want Europe to be the exporter of knowledge, technologies and best practice.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ENVI Renew Committee on Europe Dan-Ştefan Motreanu César Luena Peter Liese Jytte Guteland Nils Torvalds Silvia Sardone Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Environment, Public Health Greens/EFA GUE/NGL Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Food Safety Pacal Canfin Chair Bas Eickhout Anja Hazekamp Bas Eickhout Alexandr Vondra Silvia Modig Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe EPP ITRE Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław Krasnodębski Marisa Matias Vice-Chair Vice-Chair
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Identit〠E Democrazia
    Identità e Democrazia Da Wikipedia, l'enciclopedia libera. Identità e Democrazia (in inglese: Identity and Identità e Democrazia Democracy, ID) è un gruppo politico del Parlamento Europeo di destra, fondato nel 2019 dopo le elezioni (EN) Identity and Democracy europee del 2019. Il gruppo è il successore del gruppo Presidente Marco Zanni fondato nel 2015 Europa delle Nazioni e della Libertà. (Lega) Vicepresidente Nicolas Bay (RN) Jörg Meuthen Indice (AfD) Storia Stato Unione Obiettivi politici europea Composizione Abbreviazione ID Note Fondazione 13 giugno 2019 Voci correlate Ideologia Nazionalismo Conservatorismo Storia nazionale Populismo di Il 12 giugno 2019 è stato annunciato che il gruppo destra successore a Europa delle Nazioni e delle Libertà si Identitarismo sarebbe chiamato "Identità e Democrazia" e avrebbe Sovranismo incluso partiti come la Lega Nord (Italia), Anti-immigrazione Raggruppamento Nazionale (Francia) e Alternativa per la Collocazione Destra [1] Germania (Germania)[2]. Il leghista Marco Zanni è stato Partito europeo AEPN nominato Presidente[3]. Il 13 giugno 2019 il gruppo, composto da 73 europarlamentari, è stato lanciato a Seggi 73 / 751 Bruxelles da Marine Le Pen[4]. Europarlamento Obiettivi politici I principali obiettivi politici del gruppo sono bloccare una maggiore integrazione europea ed ottenere maggiore autonomia nelle politiche di spesa, ovvero la possibilità di fare maggiore deficit e debito senza incorrere in penalità da parte della Commissione Europea.[5] Composizione Identità e Democrazia è formato da
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Question for Written Answer
    Priority question for written answer P-002058/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Mathilde Androuët (ID), Jordan Bardella (ID), Aurelia Beigneux (ID), Dominique Bilde (ID), Annika Bruna (ID), Gilbert Collard (ID), Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Jean-François Jalkh (ID), France Jamet (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Hélène Laporte (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID), André Rougé (ID), Nicolas Bay (ID), Maxette Pirbakas (ID) Subject: Legal basis for geo-tracking and the sharing of personal data during the coronavirus outbreak On 24 March 2020, the Commission revealed that it had held talks with telecommunications operators about joining forces to tackle the coronavirus outbreak. Thierry Breton, the Internal Market Commissioner, held a videoconference with the heads of Europe’s telecommunications companies and the GSMA (Global System for Mobile Communications) to explore options for sharing geolocation metadata in order to map and forecast the spread of the virus. The Commission claims that such a move would be fully in line with the General Data Protection Regulation and e-privacy legislation. How does the Commission intend to guarantee EU citizens full anonymisation of their personal data? How exactly does the Commission envisage using such data? Not content with surveillance and quarantine enforcement, Israel and a number of Asian countries have adopted a proactive AI-based approach that alerts individuals if they have been in contact with a virus carrier. How do the Commission’s plans compare, and what logistical support will it provide the Member States which opt for this approach? PE650.848v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport DIGIMIND Evolution
    Newsletter CNR BEA n°13 Mars 2021 ALIMENTATION ANIMALE – DONT ENRICHISSEMENT ............................................................. 4 15/04/2020 : Horse Feeding and Management ........................................................................................... 4 23/02/2021 : Nutrition, feeding and laying hen welfare ............................................................................. 4 COGNITION-EMOTIONS ............................................................................................................... 5 09/03/2021 : Brain activity reflects (chronic) welfare state: Evidence from individual electroencephalography profiles in an animal model ............................................................................... 5 08/03/2021 : Que savons-nous de l'intelligence animale ? ....................................................................... 7 24/02/2021 : Les animaux parlent, sachons les écouter ........................................................................... 7 19/02/2021 : Interspecific two-dimensional visual discrimination of faces in horses (Equus caballus) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 8 17/02/2021 : Understanding fish cognition: a review and appraisal of current practices ..................... 9 16/02/2021 : Anxiety Behavior in Pigs (Sus scrofa) Decreases Through Affiliation and May Anticipate Threat ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-005578/2020 to the Council Rule 138 Julie Lechanteux (ID), Virginie Joron (ID), André Rougé (ID), Jean-Lin Lacapelle (ID), Maximilian Krah (ID), Gilles Lebreton (ID), Gunnar Beck (ID), Herve Juvin (ID), France Jamet (ID) Subject: Navalny case: additional sanctions against Russia On 7 October 2020, the German and French Ministers for Foreign Affairs announced their intention of proposing additional sanctions against Russia to their European partners, stating that 'there is no other plausible explanation' than Russia being responsible for the incident involving the politician Alexei Navalny1, which he himself has described as an attempted poisoning. This explanation harks back to the famous 'highly likely’ statement made in 2018 by the then British Prime Minister, Theresa May. Apparently, the two ministers did not need to wait for the findings of a judicial investigation to assign responsibility (naming defendants), establish guilt (delivering a verdict) and impose sanctions (handing down sentences), in a case that is still far from being definitively solved. Does the Council not take the view that such a decision violates Articles 48 and 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which state that 'everyone who has been charged shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law’ and that 'the provisions of this Charter are addressed to the institutions and bodies of the Union with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity and to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law'? Supporters2 1 https://agenceurope.eu/fr/bulletin/article/12576/39 2 This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Jean-Paul Garraud (ID), Thierry Mariani (ID) PE659.594v01-00.
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Oral Answer
    Question for oral answer to the Commission Rule 136 Eleonora Evi (Verts/ALE), Günther Sidl (S&D), Sarah Wiener (Verts/ALE), Emil Radev (PPE), Martin Buschmann (NI), Maria Noichl (S&D), Manuela Ripa (Verts/ALE), Niels Fuglsang (S&D), Marina Kaljurand (S&D), Ernest Urtasun (Verts/ALE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Aurélia Beigneux (ID), Manuel Bompard (The Left), Annika Bruna (ID), David Cormand (Verts/ALE), Pascal Durand (Renew), Yannick Jadot (Verts/ALE), Virginie Joron (ID), Caroline Roose (Verts/ALE), Marie Toussaint (Verts/ALE), Chrysoula Zacharopoulou (Renew), Clare Daly (The Left), Tiziana Beghin (NI), Rosa D'Amato (Verts/ALE), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew), Tilly Metz (Verts/ALE), Anja Hazekamp (The Left), Leszek Miller (S&D), Sylwia Spurek (Verts/ALE), Jadwiga Wiśniewska (ECR), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Tudor Ciuhodaru (S&D), Vlad Gheorghe (Renew), Malin Björk (The Left), Martin Hojsík (Renew), Michal Wiezik (PPE) Subject: An EU ban on the use of wild animals in circuses Wild animals in circuses are forced to behave in ways never seen in nature and although some of these animals have been bred for tens of generations in captivity, they still perform the behaviour typical of their wild counterparts. The welfare of wild animals in circuses is always severely compromised. Most of Member States consider that the use of wild animals in circuses does not have any educational or cultural value and, on the contrary, may have a negative impact on the public’s perception and respect of wild animals. – indeed 23 have already adopted a total or partial ban on their use. Health controls for the movement of circus animals between Member States should be applied through Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2035 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Motion for a Resolution
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting B9-0168/2020 10.6.2020 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 143 of the Rules of Procedure on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list Christine Anderson, Gerolf Annemans, Gunnar Beck, Aurelia Beigneux, Lars Patrick Berg, Dominique Bilde, Markus Buchheit, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Gilbert Collard, Marcel de Graaff, Filip De Man, Derk Jan Eppink, Nicolaus Fest, Emmanouil Fragkos, Gianna Gancia, Catherine Griset, Roman Haider, Virginie Joron, Maximilian Krah, Joachim Kuhs, Jean-Lin Lacapelle, Gilles Lebreton, Jaak Madison, Thierry Mariani, Jörg Meuthen, Guido Reil, Jérôme Rivière, Rob Rooken, Robert Roos, Hermann Tertsch, Tom Vandendriessche, Harald Vilimsky, Charlie Weimers, Bernhard Zimniok, Milan Zver RE\1207171EN.docx PE647.651v01-00 EN United in diversityEN B9-0168/2020 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on placing the Antifa movement on the EU terrorist list The European Parliament, – having regard to the Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (2001/931/CFSP)1, ,– having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/20 of 13 January 2020 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2019/13412,, – having regard to Rule 143 of its Rules of Procedure, A. whereas a terrorist act is defined in Article 1(3) of the abovementioned Council Common Position; B. whereas Antifa has organised and carried out violent attacks in the United States under the guise of protesting the death of George Floyd; whereas Antifa is known to have incited and committed violence in Europe; whereas the movement has allegedly received training from other terrorist groups in Syria; 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Parlement Européen (2019-2024)
    Le Parlement européen (2019-2024) Le parlement européen est composé de députés européens qui sont au nombre de 705 (L’un des sièges espagnol reste vacant à ce jour). A cela il faut ajouter 32 membres de la Commission et 32 membres du Conseil. Le parlement européen comprend donc au total 769 membres. Les députés européens sont élus au suffrage universel direct pour exercer un mandat de 5 ans renouvelable, en réalité nous avons 28 délégations de députés européens et le nombre de députés par pays est proportionnel à la population du pays (plus il y a d’habitants, plus l’Etat compte de députés). Le minimum de députés est fixé à 6 pour les Etats les moins peuplés (Malte, Estonie…). Depuis 1979, les députés européens sont élus au suffrage universel direct par les citoyens de chaque Etat membre. Le Parlement européen constitue le deuxième plus grand espace démocratique au monde (après l’Inde et avant les USA). FONCTIONS : Le Parlement européen exerce les fonctions classiques d’un parlement national, c’est un lieu de débat. Les députés européens évoquent les sujets d’intérêt européen, ils peuvent adopter des motions, des décisions sur n’importe quel sujet concernant l’Europe. La deuxième fonction du Parlement européen est de voter le budget annuel de 160 milliards d’euros avec le Conseil de l’Union européenne (très faible car à titre de comparaison, le budget annuel américain réservé uniquement à la défense est de 300 milliards). La troisième fonction du Parlement européen est de voter la législation européenne avec le Conseil toujours, il a le droit d’amendement, d’opposition et même le droit d’initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Age – the Coordinators
    Digital Age – The Coordinators David Sassoli S&D ”Digitalisation has a huge impact on the way we live, work and communicate. In some fields, Europe has to catch up – like for business to consumers – while in others we are frontrunners – such as in business to business. We have European Parliament to make our single market fit for the digital age, we need to make the most of artificial intelligence and big data, 1 February 2020 – H1 2024 we have to improve on cybersecurity and we have to work hard for our technological sovereignty.” — Ursula von der Leyen Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle President of the European Commission Head of Cabinet Secretary General Chairs and Vice-Chairs Political Group Coordinators EPP S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe Greens/EFA IMCO Róża Thun und Hohenstein Maria Grapini Andreas Schwab Christel Schaldemose Dita Charanzová Virginie Joron Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator the Internal Market and Consumer S&D Renew Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL Petra De Sutter Europe Protection Chair Maria Manuel Leitão Marques Pierre Karleskind Marcel Kolaja Adam Bielan Kateřina Konečná Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator S&D S&D EPP S&D Renew ID Europe ITRE EPP Patrizia Toia Lina Gálvez Muñoz Christian Ehler Dan Nica Martina Dlabajová Paolo Borchia Committee on Vice-Chair Vice-Chair Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Industry, Research Renew ECR Greens/EFA ECR GUE/NGL and Energy Cristian Bușoi Europe Chair Morten Petersen Zdzisław Krasnodębski Ville Niinistö Zdzisław
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality 2019/2169(INI) 8.6.2020 AMENDMENTS 354 - 433 Draft report Maria Noichl (PE650.408v01-00) The EU Strategy for Gender Equality (2019/2169(INI)) AM\1206796EN.docx PE652.643v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE652.643v01-00 2/44 AM\1206796EN.docx EN Amendment 354 Irène Tolleret, María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Sylvie Brunet, Samira Rafaela, Karen Melchior, Chrysoula Zacharopoulou, Hilde Vautmans, Radka Maxová, Abir Al-Sahlani Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment 15b. Recalls that sex and gender have important implications for public health, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, because both biological and social influences are critical to health, and stresses that investment in research of the differences between women and men in relation to their health should be supported through Horizon Europe in order to encourage healthcare systems that are responsive to the needs of both women and men; Or. en Amendment 355 Sandra Pereira Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment 15b. Reiterates the need to apply conditionality in the allocation of EU funds to companies that fail to meet high labour standards and discriminate against women; Or. pt Amendment 356 Sandra Pereira Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new) AM\1206796EN.docx 3/44 PE652.643v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment 15c. Stresses that the response to the COVID-19 epidemic could be used to establish
    [Show full text]
  • Xt Xt Report
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Plenary sitting A9-0000/2020 1.10.2020 REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on a Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online (2020/2019(INL)) Committee on Legal Affairs Rapporteur: Tiemo Wölken (Initiative – Rule 47 of the Rules of Procedure) RR\1213818XT.docx PE650.529v02-00 XT United in diversity XT PR_INL CONTENTS Page MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION ............................................ 3 ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION: DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED .... 13 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 31 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ......................................................................................................................... 34 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE AND EDUCATION .............................. 44 PE650.529v02-00 2/48 RR\1213818XT.docx XT MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION with recommendations to the Commission on a Digital Services Act: adapting commercial and civil law rules for commercial entities operating online (2020/2019(INL)) The European Parliament, – having regard to Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, – having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/1150 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on promoting fairness and transparency for business users of online
    [Show full text]