DOCSLIB.ORG

Writing William. William the Conqueror and the Problem of Legitimacy In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Writing William. William the Conqueror and the Problem of Legitimacy In Writing William William the Conqueror and the Problem of Legitimacy in Twelfth-Century English Historiography Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München vorgelegt von Pia Zachary aus München 2019 Erstgutachter: apl. Prof. Dr. Jörg Schwarz Zweitgutachterin: Prof. Dr. Claudia Märtl Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 7. Februar 2019 Acknowledgements This work is revised from my doctoral thesis submitted at the Ludwig-Maximilians- Universität that could not have been written in this form without the support of numer- ous people, for which I am very grateful. I wish to begin my thanks with my supervisor, Jörg Schwarz, for his constant support, feedback, and encouragement. The thesis was further examined by Claudia Märtl whom I want to thank for her feedback. Further, I want to thank Alessia Bauer for being part of the examination committee and for her constant encouragement. The fellow delegates of the conferences I attended encouraged me and lent me their advice. Thanks go especially to Emily Winkler and Alheydis Plassmann. Emily took her time to discuss my outline and shared her yet unpublished doctoral thesis. Alheydis Plassmann helped me sharpen my topic and introduced me to the Forschungsbereich England mit britischen Inseln im Mittelalter. I owe further thanks to Mark Hengerer and Martin Kaufhold for discussing my exposé with me. I further want to thank to my colleagues at the Writing Center who helped me improving my writing process and especially my English. Special thanks are to Sarah Martin and Mark Olival-Bartley for their patient proof-reading of all kind of texts, not least this one. I also would like to thank the Institut für Nordische Philologie at the University of Mu- nich. Though no longer being a student there, they offered me a working space in the library, which spared me carrying around a countless number of books. The friendly and supportive atmosphere there was one of the reasons I enjoyed writing my thesis as much as I did. Special and heartfelt thanks are due to my friends and family. They have always be- lieved in me (more than I did myself), encouraged me, listened to my problems, or dis- tracted me by going out for a coffee. Table of Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ iii 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 1066: The Kings Harold Godwinson and William the Conqueror ..................... 2 1.2 Research Status: On Medieval Historiography and William I’s Legitimacy .... 11 1.3 Sources ........................................................................................................ 16 1.3.1 Orderic Vitalis: Historia Ecclesiastica ............................................................ 19 1.3.2 Eadmer of Canterbury: Historia novorum in Anglia ....................................... 24 1.3.3 William of Malmesbury: Gesta Regum Anglorum .......................................... 28 1.3.4 Henry of Huntingdon: Historia Anglorum ....................................................... 31 1.3.5 Roger of Howden: Chronica .......................................................................... 36 1.3.6 William of Newburgh: Historia de rebus anglicis ........................................... 38 2. The Legitimisation of Kings in the Middle Ages .................................................... 42 2.1 Legitimizing the King via Structures to Rule .................................................. 42 2.1.1 The Debate on Feudality ....................................................................... 42 2.1.2 The Election by the Great: Consensual Rule ......................................... 48 2.1.3 The Rise of Bureaucracy ....................................................................... 51 2.2 Legitimizing the King via Ideologies .............................................................. 53 2.2.1 Chosen by God: Ruling by Divine Right ................................................. 53 2.2.2 Rituals and Other Symbols of Royal Power ........................................... 54 2.2.3 The Virtues of a King ............................................................................. 58 2.2.4 The Establishment of Dynasties: Hereditary Right ................................. 60 2.3 Legitimising the King in Anglo-Norman England ........................................... 63 3. The Legitimisation of Kings in Medieval Historiography ....................................... 72 3.1 Legitimising and Reflecting Legitimisation in Medieval Historical Writing ...... 72 3.2 The Depiction of Kings in Medieval Historiography ....................................... 73 3.3 Legitimising the King in Anglo-Saxon Historiography .................................... 79 3.4 The Legitimisation of William I in Eleventh-Century Historiography ............... 85 4. The Legitimisation of William I in Twelfth-Century English Historiography ............ 93 4.1 Authorising Edward the Confessor ................................................................ 93 4.2 Delegitimising Harold Godwinson ............................................................... 105 4.3 God’s Decision: The Battle of Hastings ....................................................... 124 4.4 Crowning the New King .............................................................................. 137 i 4.5 Creating the King: William I as rex iustus .................................................... 145 4.6 Blaming the Normans: The New Aristocracy as Exploiter ........................... 170 4.7 Compensating Atrocity: The Reform of the English Church ........................ 179 4.8 Handing Down the Kingdom ....................................................................... 194 5. Conclusion: The Change in Legitimising William I during the Twelfth Century ... 205 Bibliography .............................................................................................................. 219 Primary Sources .................................................................................................... 219 Secondary Sources ............................................................................................... 221 ii Abbreviations ASC Anglo-Saxon Chronicle Eadmer: HN Eadmer of Canterbury: Historia Novorum in Anglia Henry: HA Henry of Huntingdon: Historia Anglorum Orderic Vitalis: HE Orderic Vitalis: Historia Ecclesiastica Roger: Chr. Roger of Howden: Chronica William of Jumièges: GND William of Jumièges: Gesta Normannorum ducum William: GRA William of Malmesbury: Gesta regum Anglorum William: HRA William of Newburgh: Historia Rerum Anglicarum iii 1. Introduction “An entire book could indeed be devoted to the opinions which have been expressed about William [the Conqueror].”1 Bates wrote this at the beginning of his biography about the first Norman English king. William brought with the Norman Conquest many changes to the English kingdom—changes which are still a topic of controversy. The victory at Hastings made William I one of the best-known English kings but also one of the most controversial ones. As apparent from the vast amount of literature—including popular scientific works—and from their various interpretations of it, the Norman Conquest (along with William I) was and still is a controversial yet very popular topic in England. On the one hand, some see it as a civilising progress, or as stated in the famous 1066 and All That, “The Nor- man Conquest was a Good Thing, as from this time onwards England stopped being conquered and thus was able to become top nation [sic!]”2. Others, on the other hand, condemn it as the downfall of the old Anglo-Saxon England.3 Considering the emotions evoked even these days by William’s victory in the Battle of Hastings, the view of the people from the twelfth century seems to be a worthy research subject to better under- stand our memory of 1066. William I’s claim to the throne is first and foremost very problematic: Indeed, he ruled by the right of conquest. This was neither a good founda- tion of his power nor for that of his sons, who claimed the throne after him by the right of birth—especially by taking into consideration that their claims never were unchal- lenged.4 Consequently, Norman propaganda tried in the immediate aftermath of the Conquest to justify William’s rule by other means. Therefore, this work aims to find out how the historiographical sources of the twelfth century adopted these ideas and how they adapted them to address concerns of their present. The twelfth century is especially suitable as a period for investigation because the au- thors to be analysed were mostly born after 1066. Nevertheless, they experienced the consequences and changes brought about by Norman rule, and they had the possibility to speak to eye-witnesses personally. The authors did not belong to the generation that had to eulogise King William but could judge him more independently from politics. Further, at the beginning of the 13th century, the process of assimilation of the two cul- tures had largely concluded and, with the loss of Normandy in 1204, a new relationship of the Norman aristocracy to their former home country began. That makes the twelfth 1 Bates 1989, p. 2. 2 Sellar, Yeatman 1931, p. 17. 3 Chibnall 1999; Baxter 2009, pp. 78–80; Kumar 2013. The changes brought by the Norman Conquest is a huge field of study. For a general overview
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 126613853.23.Pdf
    Sc&- PUBLICATIONS OF THE SCOTTISH HISTORY SOCIETY VOLUME LIV STATUTES OF THE SCOTTISH CHURCH OCTOBEK 190' V STATUTES OF THE SCOTTISH CHURCH 1225-1559 Being a Translation of CONCILIA SCOTIAE: ECCLESIAE SCOTI- CANAE STATUTA TAM PROVINCIALIA QUAM SYNODALIA QUAE SUPERSUNT With Introduction and Notes by DAVID PATRICK, LL.D. Printed at the University Press by T. and A. Constable for the Scottish History Society 1907 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION— i. The Celtic Church in Scotland superseded by the Church of the Roman Obedience, . ix ir. The Independence of the Scottish Church and the Institution of the Provincial Council, . xxx in. Enormia, . xlvii iv. Sources of the Statutes, . li v. The Statutes and the Courts, .... Ivii vi. The Significance of the Statutes, ... lx vii. Irreverence and Shortcomings, .... Ixiv vni. Warying, . Ixx ix. Defective Learning, . Ixxv x. De Concubinariis, Ixxxvii xi. A Catholic Rebellion, ..... xciv xn. Pre-Reformation Puritanism, . xcvii xiii. Unpublished Documents of Archbishop Schevez, cvii xiv. Envoy, cxi List of Bishops and Archbishops, . cxiii Table of Money Values, cxiv Bull of Pope Honorius hi., ...... 1 Letter of the Conservator, ...... 1 Procedure, ......... 2 Forms of Excommunication, 3 General or Provincial Statutes of the Thirteenth Century, 8 Aberdeen Synodal Statutes of the Thirteenth Century, 30 Ecclesiastical Statutes of the Thirteenth Century, . 46 Constitutions of Bishop David of St. Andrews, . 57 St. Andrews Synodal Statutes of the Fourteenth Century, vii 68 viii STATUTES OF THE SCOTTISH CHURCH Provincial and Synodal Statute of the Fifteenth Century, . .78 Provincial Synod and General Council of 1420, . 80 General Council of 1459, 82 Provincial Council of 1549, ...... 84 General Provincial Council of 1551-2 ...
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a PCC Protocol Death Senior National Figure.Pdf
    Appendix A: PCC Protocol Death of Senior National Figure PORTSMOUTH CITY COUNCIL PROTOCOL FOR MARKING THE DEATH OF A SENIOR NATIONAL FIGURE OR LOCAL HOLDER OF HIGH OFFICE This protocol sets out the action to be taken in the event of the death of: H.M. The Queen H.R.H. The Duke of Edinburgh H.R.H. The Prince of Wales H.R.H. The Duchess of Cornwall H.R.H. The Duke of Cambridge H.R.H. The Duchess of Cambridge H.R.H. Prince George of Cambridge H.R.H. Princess Charlotte of Cambridge H.R.H. Prince Henry (Harry) of Wales H.R.H. The Duke of York H.R.H. The Earl of Wessex H.R.H. The Princess Royal H.R.H. The Countess of Wessex o The Prime Minister o The Members of Parliament for the constituencies of which the City of Portsmouth forms a part o A serving Mayor or Leader of the Council o A serving member of the Council Contact details for all those with responsibilities under this protocol are set out in Annexe 5 This protocol was agreed by the Chief Executive on 8th July 2016 This protocol was ratified the Leader of the Council on 8th July 2016 It is due for review not later than September 2017 1 Appendix A: PCC Protocol Death of Senior National Figure PART 1 Implementation of the Protocol on hearing of the death Action required Authorised by Other Notes Portsmouth City Council’s Implementation will be The implementing officer mourning Protocol will be authorised by the Chief will arrange for flags to be implemented on the formal Executive or Assistant lowered immediately and announcement of the Chief Executive for books of condolence to be death of any one of those implementation by Claire opened on the next persons named on page 1 Looney, Partnership & working day.
    [Show full text]
  • First Evidence of Farming Appears; Stone Axes, Antler Combs, Pottery in Common Use
    BC c.5000 - Neolithic (new stone age) Period begins; first evidence of farming appears; stone axes, antler combs, pottery in common use. c.4000 - Construction of the "Sweet Track" (named for its discoverer, Ray Sweet) begun; many similar raised, wooden walkways were constructed at this time providing a way to traverse the low, boggy, swampy areas in the Somerset Levels, near Glastonbury; earliest-known camps or communities appear (ie. Hembury, Devon). c.3500-3000 - First appearance of long barrows and chambered tombs; at Hambledon Hill (Dorset), the primitive burial rite known as "corpse exposure" was practiced, wherein bodies were left in the open air to decompose or be consumed by animals and birds. c.3000-2500 - Castlerigg Stone Circle (Cumbria), one of Britain's earliest and most beautiful, begun; Pentre Ifan (Dyfed), a classic example of a chambered tomb, constructed; Bryn Celli Ddu (Anglesey), known as the "mound in the dark grove," begun, one of the finest examples of a "passage grave." c.2500 - Bronze Age begins; multi-chambered tombs in use (ie. West Kennet Long Barrow) first appearance of henge "monuments;" construction begun on Silbury Hill, Europe's largest prehistoric, man-made hill (132 ft); "Beaker Folk," identified by the pottery beakers (along with other objects) found in their single burial sites. c.2500-1500 - Most stone circles in British Isles erected during this period; pupose of the circles is uncertain, although most experts speculate that they had either astronomical or ritual uses. c.2300 - Construction begun on Britain's largest stone circle at Avebury. c.2000 - Metal objects are widely manufactured in England about this time, first from copper, then with arsenic and tin added; woven cloth appears in Britain, evidenced by findings of pins and cloth fasteners in graves; construction begun on Stonehenge's inner ring of bluestones.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Change in Eleventh-Century Armenia: the Evidence from Tarōn Tim Greenwood (University of St Andrews)
    Social Change in Eleventh-Century Armenia: the evidence from Tarōn Tim Greenwood (University of St Andrews) The social history of tenth and eleventh-century Armenia has attracted little in the way of sustained research or scholarly analysis. Quite why this should be so is impossible to answer with any degree of confidence, for as shall be demonstrated below, it is not for want of contemporary sources. It may perhaps be linked to the formative phase of modern Armenian historical scholarship, in the second half of the nineteenth century, and its dominant mode of romantic nationalism. The accounts of political capitulation by Armenian kings and princes and consequent annexation of their territories by a resurgent Byzantium sat very uncomfortably with the prevailing political aspirations of the time which were validated through an imagined Armenian past centred on an independent Armenian polity and a united Armenian Church under the leadership of the Catholicos. Finding members of the Armenian elite voluntarily giving up their ancestral domains in exchange for status and territories in Byzantium did not advance the campaign for Armenian self-determination. It is also possible that the descriptions of widespread devastation suffered across many districts and regions of central and western Armenia at the hands of Seljuk forces in the eleventh century became simply too raw, too close to the lived experience and collective trauma of Armenians in these same districts at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries, to warrant
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Names and Denomination of Livonians in Early Written Sources
    ESUKA – JEFUL 2014, 5–1: 13–26 PERSONAL NAMES AND DENOMINATION OF LIVONIANS IN EARLY WRITTEN SOURCES Enn Ernits Estonian University of Life Sciences Abstract. This paper presents the timeline of ethnonyms denoting Livonians; specifies their chronology; and analyses the names used for this ethnos and possible personal names. If we consider the dating of the event, the earliest sources mentioning Livonians are Gesta Danorum and the Tale of Bygone Years (both 10th century), but both sources present rather dubious information: in the first the battle of Bråvalla itself or the date are dubious (6th, 8th or 10th century); in the latter we cannot be sure that the member of the Rus delegation was really a Livonian. If we consider the time of recording, the earliest sources are two rune inscriptions from Sweden (11th century), and the next is the list of neighbouring peoples of the Russians from the Tale of Bygone Years (12th century). The personal names Bicco and Ger referred in Gesta Danorum, and Либи Аръфастовъ in Tale of Bygone Years are very problematic. The first certain personal name of a Livonian is *Mustakka, *Mustukka or *Mustoikka (from Finnic *musta ‘black’) written in 1040–1050s on a strip of birch bark in Novgorod. Keywords: Livs, Finnic peoples, ethnonyms, anthroponyms, onomastics DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2014.5.1.01 1. Introduction This paper (1) seeks to present the timeline of ethnonyms denoting Livonians; (2) to specify their chronology; (3) and to analyse the names used for this ethnos and possible personal names. It is supple- mental to the paper by Mauno Koski on words denoting Livonians (Koski 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Beowulf and the Sutton Hoo Ship Burial
    Beowulf and The Sutton Hoo Ship Burial The value of Beowulf as a window on Iron Age society in the North Atlantic was dramatically confirmed by the discovery of the Sutton Hoo ship-burial in 1939. Ne hÿrde ic cymlīcor cēol gegyrwan This is identified as the tomb of Raedwold, the Christian King of Anglia who died in hilde-wæpnum ond heaðo-wædum, 475 a.d. – about the time when it is thought that Beowulf was composed. The billum ond byrnum; [...] discovery of so much martial equipment and so many personal adornments I never yet heard of a comelier ship proved that Anglo-Saxon society was much more complex and advanced than better supplied with battle-weapons, previously imagined. Clearly its leaders had considerable wealth at their disposal – body-armour, swords and spears … both economic and cultural. And don’t you just love his natty little moustache? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(Beowulf, ll.38-40.) Beowulf at the movies - 2007 Part of the treasure discovered in a ship-burial of c.500 at Sutton Hoo in East Anglia – excavated in 1939. th The Sutton Hoo ship and a modern reconstruction Ornate 5 -century head-casque of King Raedwold of Anglia Caedmon’s Creation Hymn (c.658-680 a.d.) Caedmon’s poem was transcribed in Latin by the Venerable Bede in his Ecclesiatical History of the English People, the chief prose work of the age of King Alfred and completed in 731, Bede relates that Caedmon was an illiterate shepherd who composed his hymns after he received a command to do so from a mysterious ‘man’ (or angel) who appeared to him in his sleep.
    [Show full text]
  • Erin and Alban
    A READY REFERENCE SKETCH OF ERIN AND ALBAN WITH SOME ANNALS OF A BRANCH OF A WEST HIGHLAND FAMILY SARAH A. McCANDLESS CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. PART I CHAPTER I PRE-HISTORIC PEOPLE OF BRITAIN 1. The Stone Age--Periods 2. The Bronze Age 3. The Iron Age 4. The Turanians 5. The Aryans and Branches 6. The Celto CHAPTER II FIRST HISTORICAL MENTION OF BRITAIN 1. Greeks 2. Phoenicians 3. Romans CHAPTER III COLONIZATION PE}RIODS OF ERIN, TRADITIONS 1. British 2. Irish: 1. Partholon 2. Nemhidh 3. Firbolg 4. Tuatha de Danan 5. Miledh 6. Creuthnigh 7. Physical CharacteriEtics of the Colonists 8. Period of Ollaimh Fodhla n ·'· Cadroc's Tradition 10. Pictish Tradition CHAPTER IV ERIN FROM THE 5TH TO 15TH CENTURY 1. 5th to 8th, Christianity-Results 2. 9th to 12th, Danish Invasions :0. 12th. Tribes and Families 4. 1169-1175, Anglo-Norman Conquest 5. Condition under Anglo-Norman Rule CHAPTER V LEGENDARY HISTORY OF ALBAN 1. Irish sources 2. Nemedians in Alban 3. Firbolg and Tuatha de Danan 4. Milesians in Alban 5. Creuthnigh in Alban 6. Two Landmarks 7. Three pagan kings of Erin in Alban II CONTENTS CHAPTER VI AUTHENTIC HISTORY BEGINS 1. Battle of Ocha, 478 A. D. 2. Dalaradia, 498 A. D. 3. Connection between Erin and Alban CHAPTER VII ROMAN CAMPAIGNS IN BRITAIN (55 B.C.-410 A.D.) 1. Caesar's Campaigns, 54-55 B.C. 2. Agricola's Campaigns, 78-86 A.D. 3. Hadrian's Campaigns, 120 A.D. 4. Severus' Campaigns, 208 A.D. 5. State of Britain During 150 Years after SeveTus 6.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20040245547A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0245547 A1 Stipe (43) Pub. Date: Dec. 9, 2004 (54) ULTRA LOW-COST SOLID-STATE MEMORY Publication Classi?cation (75) Inventor; Barry Cushing Stipe, San Jose, CA (51) Int. Cl.7 ................................................ .. H01L 31/109 (Us) (52) US. Cl. ............................................................ .. 257/200 Correspondence Address: (57) ABSTRACT JOSEPH P. CURTIN . A three-dimensional solid-state memory is formed from a plurality of bit lines, a plurality of layers, a plurality of tree ’ structures and a plurality of plate lines. Bit lines extend in a (73) A551 nee, Hitachi Global Stora e Technolo ies ?rst direction in a ?rst plane. Each layer includes an array of g ' B V AZ Amsterdam g memory cells, such as ferroelectric or hysteretic-resistor ' " memory cells. Each tree structure corresponds to a bit line, (21) APPL NO: 10/751 740 has a trunk portion and at least one branch portion. The trunk ’ portion of each tree structure extends from a corresponding (22) Filed; Jam 5, 2004 bit line, and each tree structure corresponds to a plurality of layers. Each branch portion corresponds to at least one layer Related US, Application Data and extends from the trunk portion of a tree structure. Plate lines correspond to at least one layer and overlap the branch (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 10/453,137, portion of each tree structure in at least one roW of tree ?led on Jun. 3, 2003, noW abandoned. structures at a plurality of intersection regions. SRIIIIII DRAM HIIIJ FLASH PROBE GUM MTJ-MRAM 3D-MHAM MATRIX ITFBRIIM GT FERAM 001 size 50F? 012 512 502 502 5F? 002 5e? 512 002 502 Minimum "1" 100m 300m 100m 30 0m 311m 100m 40 nm 400m 10 nm 100m 100m MEX.
    [Show full text]
  • Harald Hardrada Invades
    What happened when Edward the Confessor died? Harald Hardrada invades What do I need to know: • 5th January 1066 – Edward the Confessor dies The events of the Battles of Fulford • 6th January 1066 – Harold Godwinson crowned King of England From the moment that Harold Godwinson was crowned, he was aware that he Gate and Stamford Bridge What happened to the 4 contenders? faced a number of challenges to his throne. He marched south which part of his Why Hardrada won Fulford • William, Duke of Normandy claims the throne was promised to him army to prepare for an invasion by William. He left the rest of his army under the Why he lost Stamford Bridge. – he mobilises his troops in preparation for an invasion of Britain command of his brothers in law earls Edwin and Morcar. • Edgar Aethling considered too young to be King or challenge the Key Words: Harold prepares to strike! • Fulford gate decision • Fyrd • Harald Hardrada prepares to invade in the North • Haralf Hardrada of Norway invaded England in the September. • Hardrada • 8th September – peasant soldiers, known as the fyrd, sent home to • He sailed up the river Humber with 300 ships and landed 16 km (10 miles) from the city of • Stamford Bridge harvest the crops York. Earls Edwin and Morcar were waiting for him with the northern army and attempted to • Viking • Harald Hardrada invades the north of England prevent the Norwegian forces from advancing to York. • Earls Edwin and Morcar wait with the northern army to prevent the Were the battles significant? Norwegian forces from advancing The Battle of Stamford Bridge Significant because… However… The loss at Fulford meant that King Harold had to move quickly to deal with the Viking invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Andrew Aspden the Private Secretary to the Earl of Wessex, Bagshot Park, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5PL
    Captain Andrew Aspden The Private Secretary to the Earl of Wessex, Bagshot Park, Bagshot, Surrey, GU19 5PL 14th April 2021 Dear Earl of Wessex, I was deeply saddened to learn of the death of His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, and I join with the nation in mourning his loss. I write to express my deepest sympathy to you and The Countess of Wessex. On behalf of the Rayner farming family of Royal Berkshire, the whole family gives thanks for His Royal Highness’ dedicated service to the nation, and commitment to making a difference via so many charitable causes. His Royal Highness’ constant support to her Majesty throughout seven decades of marriage has been a true inspiration. I was extremely privileged that His Royal Highness was able to attend my Mayor’s ball in May 2013 at Guards Polo Club. His Royal Highness made it an incredibly special evening, as he took time to speak to the three school choirs, including the choir from St Mary’s School Ascot, and all our guests. With His Royal Highness The Prince Philip’s help, we raised a lot of money for The Prince Philip Trust Fund that night. His Royal Highness offered great support and wise words while my team was building the Carriage Driving Courses in the grounds of Windsor Castle. We will miss seeing His Royal Highness driving in his carriages and Land Rover around Home Park Private while we are preparing for the Royal Windsor Horse Show. I have many fond memories and encounters to remember His Royal Highness Prince Philip by.
    [Show full text]
  • A BIT of a Au/Areness of the Events of the Battle and Promote the Sites As an Integrated Educational Resource
    OUR AIMS U/orking u/ith the owners of the manij sites associated u/ith the Battle of Teu/kesburif. the Socretq aim to raise public A BIT OF A au/areness of the events of the battle and promote the sites as an integrated educational resource. U/e aim to encourage tourism and leisure activitq bq SLAP advertising, interpretation and presentation in connection u/ith the sites. U/e aim also to collate research into the battle, and to encourage further research, making the results available to the public through a varietu, of media. (n pursuing our objects, u/e hope to be working alongside a varietq of organisations, in Teu/kesburq and throughout the u/orld. U/e u/ill be proposing schemes and advocating projects, including fundraising for them and project managing if appropriate. U/e aim to become the Authority on the battle and battlesfte OUR OBJECTS To promote the permanent preservation of the battlefield and other sites associated u/ith the Battle of Teu/kesburq, 1471, as sites of historic interest, to the benefit of the public generaHq. To promote the educational and tourism possibilities of the ntw&Cttter vftfit battlefield and associated sites, particularity in relation to medieval historq. To promote, for public benefit, research into matters associated u/ith the sites, and to publish the useful results of such research. ISSUC 10: 2005 Free to members, otheru/ise £2.00 The First Word I have to confess that I was beginning to think that this edition of the 'Slap' First Word 2 would never appear in print.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo–Saxon and Norman England
    GCSE HISTORY Anglo–Saxon and Norman England Module booklet. Your Name: Teacher: Target: History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 Checklist Anglo-Saxon society and the Norman conquest, 1060-66 Completed Introduction to William of Normandy 2-3 Anglo-Saxon society 4-5 Legal system and punishment 6-7 The economy and social system 8 House of Godwin 9-10 Rivalry for the throne 11-12 Battle of Gate Fulford & Stamford Bridge 13 Battle of Hastings 14-16 End of Key Topic 1 Test 17 William I in power: Securing the kingdom, 1066-87 Page Submission of the Earls 18 Castles and the Marcher Earldoms 19-20 Revolt of Edwin and Morcar, 1068 21 Edgar Aethling’s revolts, 1069 22-24 The Harrying of the North, 1069-70 25 Hereward the Wake’s rebellion, 1070-71 26 Maintaining royal power 27-28 The revolt of the Earls, 1075 29-30 End of Key Topic 2 Test 31 Norman England, 1066-88 Page The Norman feudal system 32 Normans and the Church 33-34 Everyday life - society and the economy 35 Norman government and legal system 36-38 Norman aristocracy 39 Significance of Odo, Bishop of Bayeux 40 William I and his family 41-42 William, Robert and revolt in Normandy, 1077-80 43 Death, disputes and revolts, 1087-88 44 End of Key Topic 3 test 45 1 History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 2 History Module Booklet – U2B- Anglo-Saxon & Norman England, 1060-88 KT1 – Anglo-Saxon society and the Normans, 1060-66 Introduction On the evening of 14 October 1066 William of Normandy stood on the battlefield of Hastings.
    [Show full text]