Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army on Civil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army on Civil Ist Session House Document No. 4 1958 ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 A Ai THE ARMY DFFIC[ ( . SFFICEF OF ENGINEERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS VOL. 1 OF TWO VOLUMES F:86th Congress, 1st Session an .. - - - - House Document No. 4 ANNUAL REPORT, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1958 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS U.S. ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES 1958 IN TWO VOLUMES Vol. 1 CFTHE ARMY . OFF ,'DE . .. F ENGINEERS y UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON For sale by the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 35 cents 3PROPERTY OF THE UNITErD STATES GOVERNMENT CONTENTS Volume 1 Page Letter of Submittal ---------------------------------------------- V CHAPTEI I. A PROGRAM FOR WATER RESOURCES DEVEL- OPMENT 1------------------------------------- 1. Scope of the Program 1-----------------------------. 2. Status of Program 2-------------------------------- 3. Organization 3------------------------------------ II. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS PROGRESS 4----------------------------------- 1. Navigation 4-------------------------------------- 2. Shore Protection -------------------------------- 13 3. General Flood Control --------------------------- 13 4. Multiple-Purpose (Power) Projects--- -------------- 18 5. Hydroelectric Power Production--------------- ---- 21 6. Mississippi River Flood Control--------------- ----- 25 7. General Operations ------------------------------ 32 III. BENEFITS OF THE PROGRAM------------------ 34 1. Navigation ------------------------------------- 34 2. Flood Control ---------------------------------- 36 3. Other Benefits ---------------------------------- 38 4. Public Recreation Use of Project Areas--------- --- 40 5. Fish and Wildlife_ ---------------------------- 41 IV. CURRENT PROJECT PLANNING AND DEVELOP- MENT -------------------------------------- 43 1. Program Policy Matters_-------------------------- 43 2. Omnibus River and Harbor and Flood Control Bill -- 46 3. Examinations and Surveys--------------- ----- 47 4. Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors-------- -- 51 5. Beach Erosion Board ----------------------------- 51 6. Advance Engineering and Design---- -------------- 52 7. Collection and Study of Basic Data- --------------- 53 V. FUNDING TRENDS------------------------------ 55 1. Funds Available for Work_------------------------- 55 2. Annual Appropriations---------------------------- 58 3. Expenditures (Costs) ----------------------------- 61 VI. OTHER CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES----------- --- 64 1. St. Lawrence Seaway-----------------------------64 2. St. Lawrence River Joint Board of Engineers - -- 64 3. Flood Fighting and Other Emergency Operations ... 65 4. Administration of Laws for Protection of Navigable Waters_----------------------------------------- 67 5. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining, California-------- -- 69 6. Civil Works Investigation Program---- ------------ 69 7. United States Lake Survey ------------------------- 70 8. Washington, D.C., Water Supply----------------- -- 72 9. Work for Other Agencies_-------------------------- 72 10. Foreign Technical Assistance ------- 73 11. Publications of the Corps of Engineers- ------ 74 II IV CONTENTS Page CHAPTER VII. ECONOMY MEASURES_- ____---____---76 1. Organization, Facilities and Procedures -- - 76 VIII. WATERBORNE COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES -.... _______________ __ __ - 79 Volume 2 Reports on individual project operations and related civil works activities published as a separate volume. SUBJECT: Annual Report on Civil Works Activities. TO: THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY. 1. Herewith is my report for fiscal year 1958 on the civil functions of the Department of the Army administered by the Chief of Engineers. 2. These activities include the planning, funding, construction, op- eration, and maintenance of works for navigation and flood control including the multiple-purpose water resource developments associ- ated therewith, as authorized by law. The first volume of my report gives a brief description and summary, along with a record of ac- complishments during the year. The second volume sets forth the detailed engineering, fiscal, and statistical data. For the entire pro- gram-navigation, flood control, multiple-purpose projects with power, and Mississippi River and Tributaries-construction was initiated on 44 new projects, including 3 new features of the Mississippi River and Tributaries project. Construction operations were carried out on 264 additional projects, of which 80 were placed in effective operation. The major features and problems of the programs pursued during the year are outlined below. 3. The active civil works program, consisting of 3,177 project au- thorizations, has a total estimated cost of about $17 billion. Appro- priations through fiscal year 1958 for that work total about $7.9 bil- lion, leaving about $9.1 billion still required to complete the active program. Passage of additional authorizing legislation shortly after the end of the final year increased this backlog by about $750 million. 4. Navigation. Waterborne commerce of the United States during calendar year 1957 reached a record high of 1.13 billion tons, represent- ing an increase of 4 percent over the 1956 total which also was a record year. Traffic on the Great Lakes continued at a high level, amounting to 117 billion ton-miles. Traffic on the inland waterway system, ex- clusive of the Great Lakes, reached a record high of 115 billion ton- miles, an increase of 6 percent over the preceding year. 5. Work was initiated on 23 projects. Construction activities were carried out on 123 improvements, of which 55 were placed in useful operation. Maintenance operations, such as dredging, repairs, and restoration of structures, were conducted at 266 projects at a total cost of $76.9 million. These maintenance activities were confined princi- pally to deep-draft harbors and major inland waterways, and in a few lesser channels where hardship would result from non- maintenance. VI REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY, 1958 6. A major navigation improvement under construction is the St. Lawrence Seaway project, being constructed for the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. During the year all features re- quired to accommodate existing 14-foot navigation were completed to permit raising of the pool. Other major navigation improvements under construction include: Delaware River; Old River, Louisiana, navigation lock; Great Lakes Connecting Channels; the Calumet-Sag portion of the Illinois Waterway; and five replacement locks and dams on the Ohio River. 7. Flood Control. The authorized flood-control program was car- ried forward at an accelerated rate. Construction was under way on 104 specifically authorized projects, of which 17 were fully completed, and an additional 16 were advanced to the stage which permitted their beneficial use. Work was initiated on 14 new projects. Work accomplished on the Alluvial Valley of the Mississippi River project included construction or enlargement of 47 miles of levee, placement of 19 miles of bank protection, and dredging of 36 million cubic yards of material. At the end of the year construction of the entire Mis- sissippi River project was 68 percent completed. 8. Large-scale benefits have accrued to the Nation as a result of the Federal flood-control program. Flood damage prevented by Corps of Engineers' projects in useful operation is estimated to total $9 bil- lion through 30 June 1958, including $296 million during fiscal year 1958. Severe general flooding occurred in the Central Valley and other portions of California; in the Ouachita and Red River Basins of Arkansas and Louisiana; in the Wabash River Basin of Indiana and Illinois; and in seven basins of Texas-the Sabine, Trinity, Brazos, Colorado, Guadalupe-San Antonio, Nueces, and Sulphur. In Cali- fornia, during the period January through April alo 1 e, about $32 mil- lion in flood damage was experienced and about $154 million of damage was prevented by flood-control works. 9. Multiple-PurposeProjects With Power. Large multiple-purpose reservoir projects are under construction for navigation, flood control, and development of hydroelectric power. Construction was carried out on a total of 23 multiple-purpose projects, 1 of which was suffi- ciently completed for full beneficial use. At 8 of the 23 projects some or all primary project features were in useful operation at the end of the year. Maintenance activities were continued on 32 projects al- ready in operation. Generating capacity installed during the year amounted to 792,000 kilowatts. At the end of the fiscal year the gen- erating capacity in operation, 5.6 million kilowatts, represented 20 percent of the national hydroelectric capacity, or 4 percent of the total generating capacity, of the utility systems in the United States. The 27 billion net kilowatt-hours of energy generated at Corps of Engi- LETTER OF SUBMITTAL vII neers' projects during the fiscal year, an increase of 20 percent over the preceding year, represents about 20 percent of the hydroelectric energy produced and 4 percent of the total electric energy produced by all sources of the Nation's utility systems. 10. Water Supply. Besides serving their primary functions, reser- voir projects produce many collateral benefits, including water supply. The Corps is now providing over 1.2 million acre-feet of storage space for domestic and industrial water supply in 18 reservoirs serving about 40 cities and towns.
Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Flood Insurance Study
    VOLUME 4 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV004A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • 4-Year Work Plan by District for Fys 2015-2018
    4 Year Work Plan by District for FYs 2015 - 2018 Overview Section §201.998 of the Transportation code requires that a Department Work Program report be provided to the Legislature. Under this law, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) provides the following information within this report. Consistently-formatted work program for each of TxDOT's 25 districts based on Unified Transportation Program. Covers four-year period and contains all projects that the district proposes to implement during that period. Includes progress report on major transportation projects and other district projects. Per 43 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 16 Subchapter C rule §16.106, a major transportation project is the planning, engineering, right of way acquisition, expansion, improvement, addition, or contract maintenance, other than the routine or contracted routine maintenance, of a bridge, highway, toll road, or toll road system on the state highway system that fulfills or satisfies a particular need, concern, or strategy of the department in meeting the transportation goals established under §16.105 of this subchapter (relating to Unified Transportation Program (UTP)). A project may be designated by the department as a major transportation project if it meets one or more of the criteria specified below: 1) The project has a total estimated cost of $500 million or more. All costs associated with the project from the environmental phase through final construction, including adequate contingencies and reserves for all cost elements, will be included in computing the total estimated cost regardless of the source of funding. The costs will be expressed in year of expenditure dollars. 2) There is a high level of public or legislative interest in the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to MS042 International Boundary and Water Commission Records
    University of Texas at El Paso ScholarWorks@UTEP Finding Aids Special Collections Department 12-9-1975 Guide to MS042 International Boundary and Water Commission records Raymond Daguerre Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utep.edu/finding_aid This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections Department at ScholarWorks@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Finding Aids by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Guide to MS042 International Boundary and Water Commission records Span dates, 1850 – 1997 Bulk dates, 1953 – 1974 3 feet, 5 inches (linear) Processed by Raymond P. Daguerre December 9, 1975 Donated by Joseph Friedkin, International Boundary and Water Commission. Citation: International Boundary and Water Commission, 1975, MS042, C.L. Sonnichsen Special Collections Department. The University of Texas at El Paso Library. C.L. Sonnichsen Special Collections Department University of Texas at El Paso IBWC Biography or Historical Sketch Established in 1889, the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) has responsibility for applying the boundary and water treaties between the United States and Mexico and settling differences that may arise in their application. The IBWC is an international body composed of the United States Section and the Mexican Section, each headed by an Engineer-Commissioner appointed by his/her respective president. Each Section is administered independently of the other. The United States Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (USIBWC) is a federal government agency and is headquartered in El Paso, Texas. The IBWC operates under the foreign policy guidance of the Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface Water Stations in Texas
    1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY I AUSTIN, TEXAS INDEX OF SURFACE WATER STATIONS IN TEXAS Operated by the Water Resources Division of the Geological Survey in cooperation with State and Federal Agencies Gaging Station 08065000. Trinity River near Oakwood , October 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Geological Survey - Water Resources Division INDEX OF SURFACE WATER STATIONS IN TEXAS OCTOBER 1970 Copies of this report may be obtained from District Chief. Water Resources Division U.S. Geological Survey Federal Building Austin. Texas 78701 1970 CONTENTS Page Introduction ............................... ................•.......•...•..... Location of offices .........................................•..•.......... Description of stations................................................... 2 Definition of tenns........... • . 2 ILLUSTRATIONS Location of active gaging stations in Texas, October 1970 .•.•.•.••..•••••..•.. 1n pocket TABLES Table 1. Streamflow, quality, and reservoir-content stations •.•.•... ~........ 3 2. Low-fla.o~ partial-record stations.................................... 18 3. Crest-stage partial-record stations................................. 22 4. Miscellaneous sites................................................. 27 5. Tide-level stations........................ ........................ 28 ii INDEX OF SURFACE WATER STATIONS IN TEXAS OCTOBER 1970 The U.S. Geological Survey's investigations of the water resources of Texas are con­ ducted in cooperation with the Texas Water Development
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande Project
    Rio Grande Project Robert Autobee Bureau of Reclamation 1994 Table of Contents Rio Grande Project.............................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Project Authorization.....................................................6 Construction History .....................................................7 Post-Construction History................................................15 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................22 Conclusion............................................................25 Suggested Readings ...........................................................25 About the Author .............................................................25 Bibliography ................................................................27 Manuscript and Archival Collections .......................................27 Government Documents .................................................27 Articles...............................................................27 Books ................................................................29 Newspapers ...........................................................29 Other Sources..........................................................29 Index ......................................................................30 1 Rio Grande Project At the twentieth
    [Show full text]
  • FIS Report Template May 2016 Draft
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 YORK COUNTY, MAINE (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 230190 OGUNQUIT, TOWN OF 230632 ALFRED, TOWN OF 230191 OLD ORCHARD BEACH, TOWN OF 230153 ARUNDEL, TOWN Of 230192 PARSONSFIELD, TOWN OF 230154 BERWICK, TOWN OF 230144 SACO, CITY OF 230155 BIDDEFORD, CITY OF 230145 SANFORD, CITY OF 230156 BUXTON, TOWN OF 230146 SHAPLEIGH, TOWN OF 230198 CORNISH, TOWN OF 230147 SOUTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230157 DAYTON, TOWN OF 230148 WATERBORO, TOWN OF 230199 ELIOT, TOWN OF 230149 WELLS, TOWN OF 230158 HOLLIS, TOWN OF 230150 YORK, TOWN OF 230159 KENNEBUNK, TOWN OF 230151 KENNEBUNKPORT, TOWN OF 230170 KITTERY, TOWN OF 230171 LEBANON, TOWN OF 230193 LIMERICK, TOWN OF 230194 LIMINGTON, TOWN OF 230152 LYMAN, TOWN OF 230195 NEWFIELD, TOWN OF 230196 NORTH BERWICK, TOWN OF 230197 EFFECTIVE: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 23005CV002A Version Number 2.3.2.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 20 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 31 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 31 2.2 Floodways 43 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 44 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 44 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 45 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 45 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 46 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 47 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 48 SECTION
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Streamflow Gain-Loss Studies in Texas, with Emphasis on Gains from and Losses to Major and Minor Aquifers
    DistrictCover.fm Page 1 Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:33 PM In cooperation with the Texas Water Development Board Results of Streamflow Gain-Loss Studies in Texas, With Emphasis on Gains From and Losses to Major and Minor Aquifers Open-File Report 02–068 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Results of Streamflow Gain-Loss Studies in Texas, With Emphasis on Gains From and Losses to Major and Minor Aquifers By Raymond M. Slade, Jr., J. Taylor Bentley, and Dana Michaud U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 02–068 In cooperation with the Texas Water Development Board Austin, Texas 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 8027 Exchange Dr. Austin, TX 78754–4733 E-mail: [email protected] Copies of this report can be purchased from U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225–0286 E-mail: [email protected] ii CONTENTS Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • December 2014 Congressional Report (PDF)
    EPA Review under Clean Water Act Section 404 Congressional Request: 113 HR 3547 – Water: Ecosystems Fiscal Year 2015– December Section I. of the following table lists the Corps of Engineers Individual Standard Permit public notices received by EPA in December 2014 and all comment letters on individual standard permit public notices issued by EPA in December 2014. Section II. of the following table lists all comment letters on Corps of Engineers Individual Standard Permit public notices issued by EPA between October 1, 2013 and November 31, 2014. Where the Corps has made a final permit decision, it is documented below and will not appear in subsequent reports. During this reporting period, EPA received 136 Individual standard permit public notices, performed a detailed review of 89%, and subsequently provided comment letters on 10% of them. EPA is not the only commenter on Corps public notices. Other federal and state agencies and the public routinely provide comments to the Corps. Of the new public notices in Section I, the Corps has issued 14 permits, 0 permit were denied, 8 applications were withdrawn, 108 are still being processed, and 1 was verified as General Permit. Days Date(s) Date of Final Corps DA under Project Name Tracked by EPA County State EPA Review Received by Comment Decision by Decision Number review by EPA2 Letter(s)2 the Corps Date4 EPA2,3 Section I. New Actions (Public Notices and Comment Letters) SAJ-2009- Detailed Review – Municipality of Caguas Caguas Puerto Rico N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD 02331 general comments SAJ-2014-
    [Show full text]
  • This Week in New Brunswick History
    This Week in New Brunswick History In Fredericton, Lieutenant-Governor Sir Howard Douglas officially opens Kings January 1, 1829 College (University of New Brunswick), and the Old Arts building (Sir Howard Douglas Hall) – Canada’s oldest university building. The first Baptist seminary in New Brunswick is opened on York Street in January 1, 1836 Fredericton, with the Rev. Frederick W. Miles appointed Principal. Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) becomes responsible for all lines formerly January 1, 1912 operated by the Dominion Atlantic Railway (DAR) - according to a 999 year lease arrangement. January 1, 1952 The town of Dieppe is incorporated. January 1, 1958 The city of Campbellton and town of Shippagan become incorporated January 1, 1966 The city of Bathurst and town of Tracadie become incorporated. Louis B. Mayer, one of the founders of MGM Studios (Hollywood, California), January 2, 1904 leaves his family home in Saint John, destined for Boston (Massachusetts). New Brunswick is officially divided into eight counties of Saint John, Westmorland, Charlotte, Northumberland, King’s, Queen’s, York and Sunbury. January 3, 1786 Within each county a Shire Town is designated, and civil parishes are also established. The first meeting of the New Brunswick Legislature is held at the Mallard House January 3, 1786 on King Street in Saint John. The historic opening marks the official business of developing the new province of New Brunswick. Lévite Thériault is elected to the House of Assembly representing Victoria January 3, 1868 County. In 1871 he is appointed a Minister without Portfolio in the administration of the Honourable George L. Hatheway.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Chapter
    Natural Resources Chapter Comprehensive Plan Inventory & Analysis Adopted: May 20, 2006 Amended: November 5, 2013 November 6, 2007 Planning Board of York, Maine at time of chapter adoption: Glen MacWilliams, Chair Tom Manzi, Vice Chair Barrie Munro, Secretary Lee Corbin David Woods Lewis Stowe, Alternate ENACTMENT BY THE LEGISLATIVE BODY Date of Town vote to enact this Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan: ______________. Certified by the Town Clerk: _________________________________ on ___________. (signature) (date) Comprehensive Plan – York, Maine TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 II. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................................ 3 A. A GIFT FROM THE ICE AGE ........................................................................................ 3 1. Physical Resources..................................................................................................... 3 2. The Water ..................................................................................................................... 3 3. The Air ........................................................................................................................... 4 4. Living Resources ......................................................................................................... 4 B. NATURAL RESOURCE VALUES WE ENJOY .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Refinery MACT Summary Report: Evaluating Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Data
    Refinery MACT Summary Report: Evaluating Benzene Fenceline Monitoring Data Established March 2020 Updated: 2021Q2 TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... III BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 1 AIR MONITORING FOR BENZENE ............................................................................................ 1 BENZENE FENCELINE MONITORING ................................................................................................................... 1 TCEQ STATIONARY AMBIENT AIR MONITORING ................................................................................................. 1 EVALUATION OF AMBIENT AIR MONITORING DATA ............................................................... 2 EPA DELTA C CALCULATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 2 TCEQ LONG-TERM AMCV COMPARISON ......................................................................................................... 2 IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL SAMPLERS OF INTEREST .................................................................. 3 FACILITIES WITH SOIS ABOVE THE LONG-TERM AMCV FOR BENZENE .....................................
    [Show full text]