DOCSLIB.ORG

Barger Ournal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BARGER OURNAL Nee Qt:aerere Nee ,Spernere Honorem COPYRIGHTED BY ALVAN LYELL BARGER Em'l'oR The Barger Journal A PUBLICATION DEVOTED TO THE GENEALOGY AND HISTORY OF THE BARGERS AND ALLIED KINDRED ALVAN LYELL BARGER, Virginia Editor ========-=-=-=--==---=--=-===--- • ~ qoT 00r 0 THE BARGER JOURNAL is published occasionally at Charlottesville, Virginia, by Alvan Lyell Barger. All material intended for publication should be sent to the Editor as soon as collected and be typewritten if possible. The price of THE BARGER JOURNAL is ( this issue) Two Dollars. All subscriptions, contributions and communications should be directed to A. L. BARGERJ 861 W. Main St., Charlottesville, Va. l\IAJOR FRED CHARLES BARGER, of N cw York City (1842-1923). See page 30_ The Barger Journal VOL. I JUNE, 1924 NO. 1 Coram Nobis / 'VE set myself a task Herein begun ; And quite worth while it is; So must be done. For time doth not essay To keep intact One unrecorded name, Or cherished fact. Some long have gone their way: We can not tell The nan1es they bore. Nay, more: What them befell. What yet doth still remain To you, to me: Here on the printed page Hence shall it be. ALVAN LYELL BARGER. ...,? THE BARGER JOURNAL Genealogy and History The Bargers of Putman Valley, New York ANDREW BARGER 1. Andrew Barger,* head of the Putnam Valley-Peekskill branch of the Bargers, emigrated to America from Holland and settled near Putnam Valley, Putnam County, New York. Un­ anglicized we find his name spelled Andreas, and A ndreis, in the old county records and documents. A German, it appears very evident he had gone to Holland, where he remained several years before embarking for America. Coming to America, he chose farming for his vocation, and finding a suitable tract of land between what is now the village of Putnam Valley and the town of Peekskill, he settled clown there, and after years found him well established and surrounded by many of the comforts and conveniences of life. According to Blake's History of that section of New York, Andrew's name appears there as early as 1747, the record mentioning him as being a resident. As yet, there£ ore, we cannot name the year in which he settled in the former Dutch colony. His wife, who before her marriage was Phoebe Lehman, or Leighman, is said to have been a German princess. There is a tradition to the effect that the sturdy planters along the Hudson at that point took exception to the presence of a "princess" in their midst, and that Andrew Barger was ad­ vised by a rather inconsiderate citizenry to return to Europe. Accordingly, a visit was made back to Europe, where after hav­ ing sojourned for a season, he returned to his Hudson Valley home with his family, was welcomed, and peaceful relations with neighbors established which were maintained throughout life. To Andrew and Phoebe ( Lehn1an) Barger ,vere born ten children- *The figure in front of a name denotes a generation. In a given recor<l we give the head of a family, or branch, the number 1. Each one of his children is given the number 2; to each grandchild, the number 3; to each great-grandchild, the number 4, etc. THE BARGER JOURI\TAL 3 2. Andrew Barger, 'lolzo was born in 174-. 2. J aim Barger, who married !ff artlza Tompkins. 2. Alorton Barger, who died unmarried. 2. Peter Barger, wlzo Jizarried Eli:;abeih Huff. 2. Fran:; Barger, of Putnam Valle31, lVew Yark. 2. Hannah Barger, who marn~ed -- Armstrong. 2. Eli::abeth Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York. 1 2. Sop hie Barger, who married John Denn3 • 2. J erusha Barger, of Putnani Valle}', New York. 2. Marie Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York. These, in the data at hand, are only partially reported; we are desirous of obtaining quite complete records of them all. The worthy parents, Andrew and Phoebe, closed their event­ ful days at their farm home, near Putnam Valley, and were laid to rest in the cemetery at i\dan1s Corners, Putnam County, a place situated about seven miles northeast of Peekskill. A careful, conscientious decipherer of tombstone inscriptions visited the cemetery at Adams Corners, but after examining the ancient markers of graves there, was unable to determine the age, either of Andrew or his wife, so that we are as yet without this information. Twenty-four of the Bargers are buried at Adams Corners. The Putnam Valley branch of the Barger Fan1ily is a notable one, as will appear in records which are to follow. Its members are, in a very genuine sense, types of thoughtful, progressive American citizens, successful in chosen callings and faithful to public trust. 2. Andrew Barger, the eldest son of Andrew and Phoebe (Lehman) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, was born in 174-. 2. John Barger, the second son of A.nclrew and Phoebe (Lehn1an) Barger, of Putnan1 \Talley, New ..York. was born in 1748. and died about the year 1818. intennent being 111acle in the cetnetery at Adan1s Corners. 1-Ie served in the ReYolutionarv., \Var, where he was a private in the 7th Regi111ent of the Dutchess Countv., l\Iilitia. .:\ fter the war he returned to his f ann. ,vhere 4 THE BARGER JOURNAL he lived quietly until the close of life. His wife was :rvfartha, the daughter of Cornelius Tompkins, a prominent citizen of Put­ nam Valley. Their children : 3. Cornelius Barger, who married Rebecca Chapman. 3. Mary Barger, who married Jeremiah Chapman, Jr. 3. John Barger, who died unmarried. 3. Nathaniel Barger, who ·married Susannah Crawford. 3. Jane Barger, who married C orneliu~ Crawford. 3. Phoeibe Barger, who married Jedediah Hill Ison Horton. 3. Reuben Barger, who married !ska Horton. 3. Fanny Barger, who married Ananias Tompkins. 3. Cornelius Barger, son of John and Martha (Tompkins) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New Yark, was born in 1770, and died at his farm home, near Putnam Valley, February 27th, 1847, aged 77 years, 3 months and 14 days. He married (March 11th, 1789) Rebecca Chapman, the daughter of Jeremiah and Louraney (Ferris) Chapman, of Putnam Valley. She was born September 23rd, 1772, and died August 31st, 1862, aged 89 years, 11 months and 8 days. Both were buried at Adams Corners. Children : 4. Daniel Barger, who married Susan -- 4. Stephen Barger, who died unnwrried. 4. Cornelius Barger, who married Catherine Ann Smith. 4. Eliza Barger, who married Wesley Christian. 4. Mary Barger, who married Bartholonzew Tompkins. 4. Sarah Barger, who married William, Hadden. 4. Daniel Barger, son of Cornelius and Rebecca ( Chap­ man) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, was born July 10th, 1789, and died June 4th, 1871, aged 81 years, 11 months and 24 days. He married Susan---, who was born May 23rd, 1798, and died February 24th, 1887, aged 88 years, 9 months and 1 day. Both were buried in the cen1etery at Adams Corners. 4. Stephen Barger, son of Cornelius and Rebecca Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, was born October 23rd, 1791, and THE BARGER JOURNAL 5 died at Putnam Valley, New York, August 25th, 1862. He was unmarried. Intern1ent was made in the cen1etery at Adams Cor­ ners. 4. Cornelius Barger, son of Cornelius and Rebecca Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, n1arried Catherine Anne Smith. He engaged in farming at Putnam Valley. There were five children- 5. William J.1. Barger, who married Julia Volt:;el. 5. Mary Barger, who married -- Acker. 5. Susan Barger, who married John Rogers. 5. Lewis Barger, who married Mary Slater. 5. Cornelius Barger, who married Sarah Travis. Catherine Ann (Smith) Barger died September 27th, 1843, aged 45 years and 8 111onths, and was buried at Adams Corners. 5. William M. Barger, son of Cornelius and Catherine Ann (Smith) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, was both farmer and mechanic. He was an upright, honorable citizen iand a valuable member of his con1munity. He married Julia Ann Voltzel, of New York. Children: 6. Juliet Barger, who married Elijah Lickley. 6. TVz'.lliam Al. Barger, 'lf.Jho married Jane Barger. 6. Ada Barger, of Peeks/?ill, 1\Jew York. 6. Frederick Barger, who died in 1895. 6. Lc'lt1is L. Barger, 'lolzo ·married Nettie Seal. 6. Louise S. Barger, of Lalw Oscawana, New Yark. 6. Susan E. Barger, of Lake Oscawa,za, N eiv York. 6. J csse V. Barger, who married Estella TVambold. William 1\1. and Julia J\nn, the parents, died at their fann hon1e, near Putnam Valley. 6. Juliet Barger, daughter of \Villiam 1\1. and Julia Ann ( V oltzel) Barger, of Putnam \lalley, New York, married Elijah Lickley. I--Ie died 111any years ago. Juliet, his vvife, now resides in New \~ ork City. 6 THE BARGER JOURNAL 6. William M. Barger, son of William M. and Julia Ann (Voltzel) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, 1s a prominent farmer, and a gentleman of intelligence and high standing, residing at Mohegan Lake, Westchester County, New York. He married Jane Barger, the daughter of Austin and Lucinda (Tompkins) Barger, of Putnam County, New York. 6. Ada Barger, <laughter of William 1\L and Julia Ann (Voltzel) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, resides in Peekskill, Westchester County, New York. 6. Frederick Barger, son of William M. and Julia Ann (Voltzel) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, died in 1895. 6. Lewis L. Barger, son of William M. and Julia Ann (Voltzel) Barger, of Putnam Valley, New York, married Nettie Seal. 6. Louise S. Barger, daughter of William M. and Julia Ann (Voltzel) Barger, of Putnan1 Valley, New York, resides with her sister, Miss Susan E.
Recommended publications
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
  • MIAMI VALLEY BIKEWAYS235 TWP 200 East Liberty 33

    MIAMI VALLEY BIKEWAYS235 TWP 200 East Liberty 33

    47 BELLEFONTAINE 292 47 CARTER 33 UNION NOTE: LOGAN COUNTY END Southview CHIP AND 47 Park SEAL SURFACE. MIAMI VALLEY BIKEWAYS235 TWP 200 East Liberty 33 TWP 199 Liberty Hills Golf TWP 190 Club The Nation's Largest Paved Trail Network TWP 249 68 3 OH 508 Owens Fen MiamiValleyTrails.org State Nature Preserve Piatt N O R T H West Castles Liberty 287 559 OH 245 245 Ohio 245 Caverns LOGAN COUNTY 47 507 Versailles 235 CHAMPAIGN COUNTY Mad River Ansonia UPPER Market VALLEY DARKE COUNTY 185 SHELBY COUNTY SHELBY COUNTY 245 Kiser Lake Mad River 296 MIAMI COUNTY 66 JOHNSTON FARM Wilderness State Park Area & INDIAN AGENCY r e 17 iv 48 Mia m i R 29 LIPPINCOTT 68 Urbana eat Wilderness r Area G 127 Roadside 118 121 Park 589 HERR 185 25 Edison State Community PURK RIVERSIDE College SNYDER 36 CHAMPAIGN COUNTY 36 MILLERSTOWN-ERIS HANNA CODDINGTON Stillwater Lock 9 PIQUA-CLAYTON MT. PLEASANT CEMETERY Prairie SPIKER Park CROMES OH 296 NOTE: Reserve SUNSET TROY-SIDNEY 36 BEGIN 296 CROMES CHIP AND French RIVER Bradford GLE Park LOONEY SEAL IN CASSTOWN-SIDNEY Fletcher MAIN HIGH 36 SURFACE. COVINGTON-BRANDFORD MCMAKEN 49 36 SPIKER Piqua STATLER Darke County Lake PEARL Gettysburg NEW HARRISION-BRADFORD MIAMI WALNUT Temporary Wildlife Area PARK MILLERSTOWN 7 BISH DISCOVERY BUCKNECK Road Route 75 Garbry’s Big RIVER BRIDGE Goodrich- N. OAKLAND CENTER 36 Piqua detail map Giles Park Woods Y 36 MAIN Reserve & 36 571 Temporary Covington on reverse side URBANA 814 Road Route Sanctuary St. Paris 36 E. LAWN 36 MAIN PETERSON COVINGTON-GETTYSBURG Melvin Miller Park 36 Greenville N.MAIN UNION SPIDEL HAHN WILLIS Farrington N.
  • In the Beginning the Birth of Kendall – Part 1

    In the Beginning the Birth of Kendall – Part 1

    In The Beginning The Birth of Kendall – Part 1 Scott F. Kenward, DMD May, 2009 When Florida achieved statehood in 1845, Dade County was little more than a vast block of dense, mosquito-infested wilderness. Stretching from the Hillsboro Inlet at the northern edge of present-day Broward County to Indian Key, 5 miles south of Islamorada, Dade County hosted only 159 residents in 1850. That same year, in order to encourage the development of agriculture, transportation and other productive uses for federally-owned swampland, the US Congress enacted into law the Swamp Land Act of 1850. This legislation, with its loose and ill-defined definition of what constitutes a wetland, allowed the state of Florida to eventually claim, between 1880 and 1903, all the land west of Red Road (SW 57th Avenue), between SW 104th Street and N W 7 th Street. The state of Florida could then sell the land to individuals, reserve it for state use, or donate it to developers and entrepreneurs for construction of canals and railways. By the time of the nation’s Centennial in 1876, railroads had already spanned the continent and united the country in an unprecedented transportation network. The economy began a huge expansion, growing almost ten-fold in the last quarter of the 19th Century. This explosive growth required massive infusions of capital – more than Americans alone could supply – and so, European entrepreneurs invested in American railroads, mining, cattle ranches and land in prodigious amounts. One such entrepreneur was Sir Edward James Reed, a retired Chief Constructor of warships for the Royal Navy and a member of the British Parliament, representing South Wales.
  • 536 Part 117—Drawbridge Operation Regulations

    536 Part 117—Drawbridge Operation Regulations

    Pt. 117 33 CFR Ch. I (7–1–12 Edition) (c) Any Order of Apportionment 117.47 Clearance gages. made or issued under section 6 of the 117.49 Process of violations. Truman-Hobbs Act, 33 U.S.C. 516, may be reviewed by the Court of Appeals for Subpart B—Specific Requirements any judicial circuit in which the bridge 117.51 General in question is wholly or partly located, 117.55 Posting of requirements. if a petition for review is filed within 90 117.59 Special requirements due to hazards. days after the date of issuance of the ALABAMA order. The review is described in sec- tion 10 of the Truman-Hobbs Act, 33 117.101 Alabama River. U.S.C. 520. The review proceedings do 117.103 Bayou La Batre. 117.105 Bayou Sara. not operate as a stay of any order 117.107 Chattahoochee River. issued under the Truman-Hobbs Act, 117.109 Coosa River. other than an order of apportionment, 117.113 Tensaw River. nor relieve any bridge owner of any li- 117.115 Three Mile Creek. ability or penalty under other provi- sions of that act. ARKANSAS 117.121 Arkansas River. [CGD 91–063, 60 FR 20902, Apr. 28, 1995, as 117.123 Arkansas Waterway-Automated amended by CGD 96–026, 61 FR 33663, June 28, Railroad Bridges. 1996; CGD 97–023, 62 FR 33363, June 19, 1997; 117.125 Black River. USCG–2008–0179, 73 FR 35013, June 19, 2008; 117.127 Current River. USCG–2010–0351, 75 FR 36283, June 25, 2010] 117.129 Little Red River.
  • Occurrence and Distribution of Fish Species in the Great and Little Miami River Basins, Ohio and Indiana, Pre-1900 to 1998

    Occurrence and Distribution of Fish Species in the Great and Little Miami River Basins, Ohio and Indiana, Pre-1900 to 1998

    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Occurrence and Distribution of Fish Species in the Great and Little Miami River Basins, Ohio and Indiana, Pre-1900 to 1998 By Stephanie Harrington Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4198 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. For additional information write to: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey 6480 Doubletree Avenue Columbus, OH 43229-1111 Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Columbus, Ohio 1999 Foreword The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey • Describe how water quality is changing over (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the time. earth resources of the Nation and to provide informa- •Improve understanding of the primary natural tion that will assist resource managers and policymak- and human factors that affect water-quality ers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound conditions. decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and This information will help support the development trends is an important part of this overall mission. and evaluation of management, regulatory, and moni- One of the greatest challenges faced by water- toring decisions by other Federal, state, and local resources scientists is acquiring reliable information agencies to protect, use, and enhance water resources. that will guide the use and protection of the Nation’s The goals of the NAWQA Program are being water resources.
  • Department of the Interior

    Department of the Interior

    Vol. 77 Tuesday, No. 30 February 14, 2012 Part VI Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for the Rayed Bean and Snuffbox Mussels Throughout Their Ranges; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:11 Feb 13, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\14FER3.SGM 14FER3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 8632 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 14, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Species Information are swollen, turned forward and inward, and extended above the hingeline Rayed Bean Fish and Wildlife Service (Cummings and Mayer 1992, p. 162). The rayed bean is a small mussel, Beak sculpture consists of three or four 50 CFR Part 17 usually less than 1.5 inches (in) (3.8 faint, double-looped bars (Cummings centimeters (cm)) in length (Cummings and Mayer 1992, p. 162; Parmalee and [Docket No. FWS–R3–ES–2010–0019; and Mayer 1992, p. 142; Parmalee and Bogan 1998, p. 108). The anterior end of 4500030113] Bogan 1998, p. 244; West et al. 2000, p. the shell is rounded, and the posterior 248). The shell outline is elongate or end is truncated, highly so in females. ovate in males and elliptical in females, RIN 1018–AV96 The posterior ridge is prominent, being and moderately inflated in both sexes, high and rounded, while the posterior Endangered and Threatened Wildlife but more so in females (Parmalee and slope is widely flattened. The posterior and Plants; Determination of Bogan 1998, p.
  • July 1951 on New York Central Railroad

    July 1951 on New York Central Railroad

    PULLMAN ASSIGNMENTS FOR JULY 1951 ON NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD NYC SYSTEM Westbound Other RR NYC SYSTEM Eastbound Loading Day Frequency Other Features AC Owner Key Line Seq.Origin Destination PLE B&A NYC StLS MC B4 THB PLE Num RR PLE THB B4 MC StLA NYC B&A PLE Number D E5 E6 E7 5 6 7 A S Car Name Plan 1 2 22 ROOOMETTE, POSTWAR LIGHTWEIGHT 5220 1 New York Chicago 65 650 1 Caminada Bay 4122 EM NYC 5220 2 Chicago New York 66 663 1 Cape Code Bay 4122 EM NYC 5217 1 New York Chicago 67 6701 1 Tampa Bay 4122 EP EM NYC 5217 2 Chicago New York 68 6801 1 Tawas Bay 4122 EP EM NYC 5217 1 New York Chicago 67 6702 1 Traverse Bay 4122 EP EM NYC 5217 2 Chicago New York 68 689 1 Three Mile Bay 4122 EP EM NYC 5180 1 New York Chicago 59 591 1 James Bay 4122 EM NYC 5168 2 Chicago New York 22 221 1 Little Neck Bay 4122 EM NYC 3 Manhasset Bay 4122 EM NYC 5218 1 New York Detroit 47 47 477 1 Nahant Bay 4122 EM NYC 5218 2 New York Detroit 17 17 1703 1 Nahant Bay 4122 EM NYC 5218 3 Detroit New York 48 48 487 1 New York Bay 4122 EM NYC 5218 1 New York Detroit 47 47 478 1 Pigeon Bay 4122 EM NYC 5218 2 Detroit New York 48 48 488 1 Quincy Bay 4122 EM NYC 5182 1 New York Cleveland 57 570 1 Raritan Bay 4122 EM NYC 5182 2 Cleveland New York 58 580 1 Saginaw Bay 4122 EM NYC 5182 1 New York Cleveland 57 570 1 Turtle Bay 4122 EM NYC 5182 2 Cleveland New York 58 585 1 Peekskill Bay 4122 EM NYC 5158 1 New York Rochester 99 993 1 Haverstraw Bay 4122 EM NYC 5158 2 Rochester New York 6 600 1 Humber Bay 4122 EM NYC 5266 1 Buffalo Cincinnati 15 15 155 1 Smithtown Bay 4122 EM NYC
  • Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units

    Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units

    Boundary Descriptions and Names of Regions, Subregions, Accounting Units and Cataloging Units Region 01 New England Region -- The drainage within the United States that ultimately discharges into: (a) the Bay of Fundy; (b) the Atlantic Ocean within and between the states of Maine and Connecticut; (c) Long Island Sound north of the New York-Connecticut state line; and (d) the Riviere St. Francois, a tributary of the St. Lawrence River. Includes all of Maine, New Hampshire and Rhode Island and parts of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, and Vermont. Subregion 0101 -- St. John: The St. John River Basin within the United States. Maine. Area = 7330 sq.mi. Accounting Unit 010100 -- St. John. Maine. Area = 7330 sq.mi. Cataloging Units 01010001 -- Upper St. John. Maine. Area = 2120 sq.mi. 01010002 -- Allagash. Maine. Area = 1250 sq.mi. 01010003 -- Fish. Maine. Area = 908 sq.mi. 01010004 -- Aroostook. Maine. Area = 2420 sq.mi. 01010005 -- Meduxnekeag. Maine. Area = 634 sq.mi. Subregion 0102 -- Penobscot: The Penobscot River Basin. Maine. Area = 8610 sq.mi. Accounting Unit 010200 -- Penobscot. Maine. Area = 8610 sq.mi. Cataloging Units 01020001 -- West Branch Penobscot. Maine. Area = 2150 sq.mi. 01020002 -- East Branch Penobscot. Maine. Area = 1130 sq.mi. 01020003 -- Mattawamkeag. Maine. Area = 1510 sq.mi. 01020004 -- Piscataquis. Maine. Area = 1460 sq.mi. 01020005 -- Lower Penobscot. Maine. Area = 2360 sq.mi. Subregion 0103 -- Kennebec: The Kennebec River Basin, including part of Merrymeeting Bay. Maine. Area = 5900 sq.mi. Accounting Unit 010300 -- Kennebec. Maine. Area = 5900 sq.mi. Cataloging Units 01030001 -- Upper Kennebec. Maine. Area = 1570 sq.mi. 01030002 -- Dead. Maine. Area = 878 sq.mi.
  • 90 Dams Removed in 2019 to Restore Rivers

    90 Dams Removed in 2019 to Restore Rivers

    90 Dams Removed in 2019 to Restore Rivers American Rivers releases annual list including dams in Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin for a total of 26 states. Nationwide, 1,722 dams have been removed from 1912 through 2019. Dam removal brings a variety of benefits to local communities, including restoring river health and clean water, revitalizing fish and wildlife, improving public safety and recreation, and enhancing local economies. Working in a variety of functions with partner organizations throughout the country, American Rivers contributed financial and technical support in many of the removals. Contact information is provided for dam removals, if available. For further information about the list, please contact Jessie Thomas-Blate, American Rivers, Director of River Restoration at 202.347.7550 or [email protected]. This list includes all dam removals reported to American Rivers (as of February 6, 2020) that occurred in 2019, regardless of the level of American Rivers’ involvement. Inclusion on this list does not indicate endorsement by American Rivers. Dams are categorized alphabetically by state. Howle and Turner Dam, Tallapoosa River, Alabama The removal of Howle and Turner Dam was in the works for over four years. This project was the result of a great partnership between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Partners for Fish and Wildlife program and the Alabama Rivers and Streams Network. The Service coordinated the pre-restoration planning and worked with their Fisheries and Aquatic Conservation Aquatic Habitat Restoration Team to carry out the demolition and restoration of the river channel.
  • Awi 2018-02 Adirondack Watershed Institute Year in Review 1 Stewardship Program

    Awi 2018-02 Adirondack Watershed Institute Year in Review 1 Stewardship Program

    AWI 2018-02 ADIRONDACK WATERSHED INSTITUTE YEAR IN REVIEW 1 STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM Graphic by Jake Sporn www.adkwatershed.org ADIRONDACK WATERSHED INSTITUTE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Program Description and Methods ............................................................................................................ 14 Summary of Results ................................................................................................................................... 24 Program Discussion and Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 45 Great Lakes Restoration Initiative: Lake Ontario Headwaters Watercraft Inspection Program ................................ 45 2017 Adirondack AIS Spread Prevention Program ...................................................................................... 52 Education and Outreach ............................................................................................................................ 60 Special Project Reports .............................................................................................................................. 64 Location Use Data
  • Ohio-River-Fact-Book-1994-Smaller-File

    Ohio-River-Fact-Book-1994-Smaller-File

    9=0 Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Conunisslon MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION* ILLINOIS Richard S. Engelbrecht, Ph.D., Professor of Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Mary A. Gade, Director, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Phillip C. Morgan, Director, Danville Sanitary District INDIANA Joseph H. Harrison, Sr., Attorney, Bowers, Harrison, Kent & Miller Albert R. Kendrick, Jr. Kathy Prosser, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Management KENTUCKY Gordon R. Garner, Executive Director, Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District Ed Logsdon, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture Phillip J. Shepherd, Secretary, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet NEW YORK Douglas E. Conroe, Director of Operations, Chautauqua Institution Thomas A. Erlandson, Ph.D., Professor of Biology & Geology. Jamestown Community College Langdon Marsh, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation OHIO Lloyd N. Clausing Richard Miller Donald R. Schregardus, Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency PENNSYLVANIA Arthur A. Davis, Secretary, Department of Environmental Resources Melvin E. Hook, R&D Engineering P.C. William M. Kudaroski, PA-American Water Company VIRGINIA Henry 0. Holliman, Ph.D. Delores Z. Pretlow, Ph.D. W. Bidgood Wall, State Water Control Board WEST VIRGINIA Edgar N. Henry David C. Callaghan, Director, Department of Commerce, Labor & Environmental Resources Ronald R. Potesta, Terradon Corporation UNITED STATES Valdas V. Adarnkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection
  • PARKING GARAGE 7 Proposal Artists City of Coral Gables Powered by Submittable

    PARKING GARAGE 7 Proposal Artists City of Coral Gables Powered by Submittable

    PARKING GARAGE 7 Proposal Artists City of Coral Gables Powered by Submittable Name Grimanesa Amoros 08/20/2020 by Grimanesa Amoros in Coral Gables Parking Garage 7 RFQ id. 17273216 117 Hudson St. 6th Floor New York, New York 10013 United States 212-941-9787 [email protected] Request for Proposal - Agreement CG AiPP Garage 7 04/29/2021 Name Grimanesa Amoros Overview Please read and complete the applicable fields to enter into an Agreement with you (the Applicant) as "Artist" and the City of Coral Gables for submission of a Project Proposal as noted herein. The City will award a fixed fee of $2,500 for the preparation of an Artist Proposal. This fee shall constitute full compensation for all services and materials to be performed and furnished by Artist as part of this Agreement. Artist will bear all costs related to the proposal, including any transportation to Coral Gables for purposes of research, completing and presenting the Proposal. At the request of City staff, Artist will make available to the City preliminary drafts of the Proposal at no additional cost. Payment shall be made upon acceptance of Artist Proposal by the City in consideration of the Applicant's Agreement to abide by the terms and conditions contained herein and upon receipt of an invoice from the Artist. In the event of approval of the Project Proposal by the City Commission, the City will enter into a separate agreement with the Artist confirming details of the project itself. W-9 Form W-9_Grimanesa_Amoros.pdf Registration Form Supplier_Registration_Amoros_Studio_LLC.pdf Research & Concept After execution of this Agreement, the Artist shall visit the City of Coral Gables if possible and conduct Proposal additional research of the project site, building occupants, and the community in general.