Ohio-River-Fact-Book-1994-Smaller-File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ohio-River-Fact-Book-1994-Smaller-File 9=0 Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Conunisslon MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION* ILLINOIS Richard S. Engelbrecht, Ph.D., Professor of Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois Mary A. Gade, Director, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Phillip C. Morgan, Director, Danville Sanitary District INDIANA Joseph H. Harrison, Sr., Attorney, Bowers, Harrison, Kent & Miller Albert R. Kendrick, Jr. Kathy Prosser, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Management KENTUCKY Gordon R. Garner, Executive Director, Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District Ed Logsdon, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture Phillip J. Shepherd, Secretary, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet NEW YORK Douglas E. Conroe, Director of Operations, Chautauqua Institution Thomas A. Erlandson, Ph.D., Professor of Biology & Geology. Jamestown Community College Langdon Marsh, Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation OHIO Lloyd N. Clausing Richard Miller Donald R. Schregardus, Director, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency PENNSYLVANIA Arthur A. Davis, Secretary, Department of Environmental Resources Melvin E. Hook, R&D Engineering P.C. William M. Kudaroski, PA-American Water Company VIRGINIA Henry 0. Holliman, Ph.D. Delores Z. Pretlow, Ph.D. W. Bidgood Wall, State Water Control Board WEST VIRGINIA Edgar N. Henry David C. Callaghan, Director, Department of Commerce, Labor & Environmental Resources Ronald R. Potesta, Terradon Corporation UNITED STATES Valdas V. Adarnkus, Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V Jean M. Barren OFFICERS: Ronald A. Potesta, Chairman Thomas A. Erlandson, Ph.D., Vice-Chairman Richard Miller, Secretary Richard L. Herd, Jr., Treasurer Alan H. Vicoiy, Jr., Executive Director and Chief Engineer LEGAL COUNSEL: Thomas D. Heekin, Taft, Stettinius & Hollister *As ofDece;nber 31, 1994 OHIO RIVER WATER QUALITY FACT BOOK A Compendium of Information for Use in Water Quality Analysis of the Ohio River -%A,ko .,0 OHIO RIVER VALLEY WATER SANITATION COMMISSION 5735 Kellogg Avenue Cincinnati, Ohio 45228-1112 (513) 231-7719 December 1994 Price: $10.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword SECTION I: HYDROLOGY Figure 1 - Ohio River Basin with Major Tributary Watersheds 2 United States Geological Survey Stream Flow Gages-Ohio River Main Stem 3 United States Geological Survey Stream Flow Gages-Major Ohio River Tributaries 4 Ohio River Navigation Dams 5 Normal Pool, Flood Stage, and Elevation for Selected Ohio River Locations 7 Critical Flows and Discharge Quantities 9 Selected Tributaries to the Ohio River 10 Corps of Engineers Reservoirs in the Ohio River Basin Which Provide Flow Augmentation 12 Annual Climatic Data for Selected Cities-Ohio River Basin 14 Monthly Air Temperatures at Selected Cities-Ohio River Basin 15 Average Precipitation in Selected Cities-Ohio River Basin 16 Average Monthly Precipitation for Selected Cities-Ohio River Main Stem 17 Average Monthly Stream Flow-Ohio River 18 Average Monthly Stream Flow-Ohio River Tributaries 19 Minimum Monthly Average Stream Flow-Ohio River 20 Minimum Monthly Average Stream Flow-Ohio River Tributaries 21 Ohio River Channel Geometry 22 SECTION II: LAND USE 23 Selected Cities on the Ohio River (Map) 24 Land Use of the Major Sub-Basins of the Ohio River 25 Land Area and Population Within the Ohio River Basin 26 Population of Cities in the Ohio River Basin 1970, 1980, and 1990 27 River Mile Points of Counties Bordering the Ohio River 28 SECTION III: WATER USE 29 Summary of Ohio River Waterbody Segments 30 Ohio River Public Drinking Water Intakes 32 Industrial Water Intakes Along the Ohio River 33 Power Generating Facilities on the Ohio River 38 Combined Sewer Overflows Along the Ohio River 40 Permitted Dischargers to the Ohio River 42 Municipal Waste Water Treatment Plant Discharges to the Ohio River 61 River Terminals Handling Petroleum Products and Hazardous Chemicals-Ohio River 66 River Terminals Handling Petroleum Products and Hazardous Chemicals-Ohio River Tributaries 72 SECTION IV: WATER QUALITY 75 ORSANCO Sampling Locations 77 ORSANCO Monitoring Stations and STORET Codes 79 State Sampling Locations in the Ohio River Basin 81 United States Geological Survey (NASQAN) National Stream Quality Accounting Network Stations-Ohio River and Primary Tributaries 89 Average Monthly Water Temperature-Ohio River Electronic Monitors 90 Maximum Monthly Average Temperature-Ohio River Tributary Electronic Monitors 91 Average Monthly Specific Conductance-Ohio River Electronic Monitors 92 Average Monthly Specific Conductance-Ohio River Tributary Electronic Monitors 94 Long Term Average (With Standard Deviation) Over Period of Record for each Monitoring Station by Month 95 SECTION V: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SOURCES 97 State of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 98 State of Indiana Department of Environmental Management 99 Commonwealth of Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Protection 100 State of New York Department of Environmental Conservation 103 State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency 104 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources .106 Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 107 State of West Virginia Division of Environmental Protection 108 U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Offices 109 U.S. Department of the Army Corps of Engineers 110 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 111 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Offices 112 U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Offices 113 U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service 114 ORSANCO Publications 115 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission Pollution Control Standards APPENDIX B Conversion Factors for Water Quality Analysis APPENDIX C Saturation Values of Dissolved Oxygen in Water Exposed to Water-Saturated Air Containing 20.90% Oxygen Under a Pressure of 760 mm Hg FOREWORD This is the third edition of the Ohio River Fact Book, first published in 1986. With the publication of this third edition, corrections and additions have been incorporated as suggested by its users, and information has been updated where appropriate. This is intended to be a dynamic document with periodic updating and supplementation as new information becomes available. Users of this document are encouraged to suggest other information for inclusion in subsequent editions. Many factors, both natural and manmade, affect the water quality of the Ohio River. In order to properly interpret the results of water quality studies, it is necessary to have some understanding of these factors. The information in this book is divided into five sections: Hydrology, Land Use, Water Use, Water Quality, and Directories and Publications. Each section begins with a brief discussion of potential water quality relationships and information included in that section. Ohio River mile points are included in many of the tables in this text, beginning at Pittsburgh, Mile Point 0, and ending where the Ohio River enters the Mississippi River at Mile Point 981. Tributary mile points are expressed as zero (0) where they enter the Ohio River. In addition to Commission sources, much of the information has been developed by other agencies actively concerned with the Ohio River, including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Geological Survey and water pollution control agencies of the six states along the Ohio River -- Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. SECTION I: HYDR OL 0 G Y Hydrology is the branch of science dealing with the distribution of surface and ground water, and with the cycle involving precipitation, evaporation and flow. For purposes of water quality analysis of rivers, the most important hydrologic factor is stream flow in terms of quantity and velocity. The quantity of flow in a river is a function of the amount of precipitation falling on the drainage basin and the runoff characteristics of the basin. Seasonal variations in precipitation result in similar variations in stream flow. In the Ohio River, flow is influenced by operations of the Corps of Engineers for the purpose of maintaining year-round navigation on the river. Long-term records of stream flow are maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey which operates gages on streams throughout the country. Twelve gages are operated on the Ohio River. Navigation dams on the Ohio River have a significant impact on the velocity of the stream. The modern high lift dams have resulted in a deeper, slower moving river than existed previously. This suggests certain influences on water quality: settling of some materials would increase, resulting in lower turbidity, while atmospheric reaeration would decrease, resulting in lower dissolved oxygen. The year in which each high lift dam was constructed is therefore critical information in the interpretation of historic water quality data. Most of the Ohio River Basin is drained by tributaries, less than five percent of the basin drains directly to the main stem. The runoff characteristics of the tributaries therefore determine the quantity of flow in the Ohio at any time. The Corps of Engineers operates numerous reservoirs in the Ohio River Basin. Most were built for flood control purposes, many are also used to provide flow augmentation at critical periods. This has resulted in an increase in the quantity of flow that could otherwise be expected in the dry weather months. Climate is a major factor in determining the seasonal variation in stream flow. Precipitation
Recommended publications
  • Vegetation Survey of Monongahela River Phase 2 - 2001 VEGETATION SURVEY of the MONONGAHELA RIVER
    Vegetation Survey of Monongahela River Phase 2 - 2001 VEGETATION SURVEY OF THE MONONGAHELA RIVER Prepared by: Dr. Susan Kalisz Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh 3 Rivers - 2nd Nature Studio for Creative Inquiry Carnegie Mellon University 3R2N Woody Vegetation Survey Phase 2 - 2001 For more information on the 3 Rivers – 2nd Nature Project, see http:// 3r2n.cfa.cmu.edu If you believe that eeeccooll ooggii ccaall ll yy hheeaall tthhyy rrii vveerrss aarree 22 nndd NNaattuurree and would like to participate in a river dialogue about water quality, recreational use and biodiversity in the 3 Rivers Region, contact: Tim Collins, Research Fellow Director 3 Rivers - 2nd Nature Project STUDIO for Creative Inquiry 412-268-3673 fax 268-2829 [email protected] CCooppyyrrii gghhtt ©© 2002 –– SSttuuddii oo ffoorr CCrreeaattii vvee II nnqquuii rryy,, CCaarrnneeggii ee MMeell ll oonn All rights reserved Published by the STUDIO for Creative Inquiry, Rm 111, College of Fine Arts, Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh PA 15213 412-268-3454 fax 268-2829 http:// www.cmu.edu/studio First Edition, First Printing 2 CCoo--AAuutthhoorrss Tim Collins, Editor Reiko Goto, C0-Director, 3R2N Priya Krishna, GIS (Geographical Information System) PPaarrttnneerrss ii nn tthhii ss PPrroojj eecctt 3 Rivers Wet Weather Incorporated (3RWW) Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) Allegheny County Sanitary Authority (ALCOSAN) 3 RRii vveerrss -- 2nndd NNaattuurree AAddvvii ssoorrss Reviewing this Project John Arway Chief Environmental Services, PA Fish and Boat Commission Wilder Bancroft Environmental Quality Manager, Allegheny County Health Dept. Bob Bingham Professor Art, Co-Director, STUDIO for Creative Inquiry, CMU Don Berman Environmental Consultant, Jacqui Bonomo V.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Kanawha Byway
    Little Kanawha Byway Perhaps the most accessible of all of West Virginia’s byways, the Little Kanawha Byway is bookended by I-77 and I-79. Starting in the west at I-77, the parkway begins its journey in Mineral Wells and mirrors the banks of the Little Kanawha River. Being totally paved, this roadway is perfect for RVs and others wanting a smooth ride so they can take in all of the beautiful pastoral sites. Hughes River Wildlife Management Area The byway passes the Hughes River Wildlife Management Area (WMA). This 10,000-acre WMA allows hunting for turkey, deer, grouse, squirrel, and rabbit. The nearby Hughes River, along with the Little Kanawha, is filled with muskellunge, smallmouth bass, and channel catfish perfect for a weekend fishing trip. Burning Springs Further along the river, the town of Burning Springs was once one of the major hubs of the American oil industry. In 1859, and later in the 1890s, the area around Burning Springs and Parkersburg was literally seeping with oil just beneath the surface. These oil strikes turned many men into millionaires in only a few months until the shallow wells ran dry. For those interested in seeing a piece of the Mountain State’s oil history, The Parkersburg Oil & Gas Museum is restoring one of the old derricks that stood above the oilfields in Burning Springs. Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area At the eastern edge of the byway, the beautiful lake and surrounding protected fields and forests of the Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area provide a welcome respite from the hurried pace of today’s world.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT TMDL Salt Fork Vermilion River Watershed
    DRAFT TMDL Salt Fork Vermilion River Watershed Prepared for: Illinois Environmental Protection Agency July 2007 Spoon Branch (IL_BPJD-02): Dissolved oxygen Salt Fork Vermilion River (IL_BPJ-10): Nitrate, pH Salt Fork Vermilion River (IL_BPJ-08): Nitrate, pH Salt Fork Vermilion River (IL_BPJ-03): Nitrate, fecal coliform bacteria Ann Arbor, Michigan www.limno.com This page is blank to facilitate double sided printing. Draft TMDL July 2007 Salt Fork Vermilion River Watershed TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 1. Problem Identification .....................................................................................................3 2. Required TMDL Elements...............................................................................................5 3. Watershed Characterization...........................................................................................19 4. Description of Applicable Standards and Numeric Targets ..........................................25 4.1 Designated Uses and Use Support .........................................................................25 4.2 Water Quality Criteria............................................................................................25 4.3 Development of TMDL Targets ............................................................................26 5. Development of water quality modelS ..........................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Lakes in the Vermilion (Wabash) River Watershed
    29. Vermilion (Wabash) River Watershed N Good BPKS Fair Poor Watershed Boundary County Boundaries Reference Communities VERMILION BPG BPKQ BPGD BPKP BPGE FORD BPKK CHAMPAIGN BPKI BPKL BPGC BPJI BPK BPJG BPGB STREAM CODES BPKF BPK BO Little Vermilion River BPJD BOB Yankee Branch BPKE BPKB BPF BOC Fairview Ditch BPJM BOD Fayette Creek BPJC BPJL BPG BOE Swank Creek BOG Archie Creek BOH Baum Branch BPK BOI Freedwell Branch BPJB BOJ Goodall Branch BP BOZ Ellis Branch BPJN BP Vermilion River BPJCA BPF BPE Grape Creek BPI Stoney Creek BPF BP BPG North Fork Vermilion River BPJ BPE BPGB Painter Creek BPJA BOD Jordan Creek BPGC BPJF BPGD Hoopeston Branch BOZ PBGE Middle Branch BPI Butler Branch BO BOE BOC BPJ Salt Fork Vermilion River BOI BO BPJA Jordan Creek Stony Creek BPJB BOH BPJC Saline Branch BOJ BPJCA Boneyard Creek BOB BPJD Spoon Branch BPJF Olive Branch BOG BPJG Upper Salt Fork Drainage Ditch BPJI Flatville Branch Water Quality Comparison BPJL Feather Creek BPJM Union Drainage Ditch 59.3% 5 0 5 10 Miles BPJN Conkey Branch 88.1% 1.3% 0.8% BPK Middle Fork Vermilion River 10.6% BPKB Windfall Creek 39.9% BPKE Collison Branch BPKF Knights Branch BPKI Bluegrass Creek Basin 29 Statewide BPKK Sugar Creek PBKL Prairie Creek BPKP Big Four Ditch BPKQ Big Four Ditch Tributary Illinois Environmental Protection Agency BPKS Wall Town Ditch Bureau of Water Surface Water Section 29. Vermilion (Wabash) River Watershed LAKE CODES N CLEAR (VERMILION) RBR CRYSTAL (CHAMPAIGN) RBU GEORGETOWN RBS HOMER RBO LONG (VERMILION) RBM MINGO RBN VERMILION RBD WILLOW CREEK RBY FORD VERMILION CHAMPAIGN # RBN RBD# RBR# # # RBM RBU RBO# # RBY # RBS 5 0 5 10 15 20 Miles # Good Water Quality Comparison # Fair # Poor 9.4% 15.9% Watershed Boundary 90.6% 74.2% 9.9% County Boundaries Rivers and Streams Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Reference Communities Bureau of Water Surface Water Section Basin 29 Statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • Knickzones in Southwest Pennsylvania Streams Indicate Accelerated Pleistocene Landscape Evolution
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2020 Knickzones in Southwest Pennsylvania Streams Indicate Accelerated Pleistocene Landscape Evolution Mark D. Swift West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Geomorphology Commons Recommended Citation Swift, Mark D., "Knickzones in Southwest Pennsylvania Streams Indicate Accelerated Pleistocene Landscape Evolution" (2020). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7542. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7542 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Knickzones in Southwest Pennsylvania Streams Indicate Accelerated Pleistocene Landscape Evolution Mark D. Swift Thesis Submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Geography Jamison Conley, Ph.D., Co-Chair J. Steven Kite, Ph.D., Co-Chair Nicolas Zegre, Ph.D. Department of Geology and Geography Morgantown, West Virginia 2020 Keywords: landscape evolution, knickzone, southwest Pennsylvania Copyright 2020 Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
    MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE Grant County, Indiana Prepared for: Grant County, Indiana Town of Converse, Indiana Town of Fairmount, Indiana Town of Fowlerton, Indiana City of Gas City, Indiana City of Jonesboro, Indiana City of Marion, Indiana Town of Matthews, Indiana Town of Swayzee, Indiana Town of Sweetser, Indiana Town of Upland, Indiana Town of Van Buren, Indiana January 2017 Prepared by Christopher B. Burke Engineering, LLC 115 West Washington Street, Suite 1368 South Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 CBBEL Project No. 16-194 DISCLAIMER Exhibits and any GIS data used within this report are not intended to be used as legal documents or references. They are intended to serve as an aid in graphic representation only. Information shown on exhibits is not warranted for accuracy or merchantability. LOCAL PROJECT CONTACTS: Bruce Bender, Director 401 South Adams Street Marion IN 46953 765.651.2410 [email protected] Tom Culley, Deputy Director 401 South Adams Street Marion IN 46953 765.651.2410 [email protected] Grant County MHMP Update January 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Disaster Life Cycle ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Scope and Purpose .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Boone National Forest Historic Sites by Robert F
    DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST HISTORIC SITES BY ROBERT F. COLLINS Forest Supervisor, United States Department of Agriculture Winchester, Kentucky Paper given before The Filson Club, June 5, 1967 INTRODUCTION The Daniel Boone National Forest, located in portions of 22 counties in Eastern Kentucky, administers over one-half million acres of Govern- merit-owned land under the multiple-use concept for the principal natural resources of timber, water, wildlife, and recreation. However, the area within the proclamation and purchase unit boundaries of Ken- tucky's only national forest also encompasses a great wealth of historic sites involving the early history of the settlement of the middle west and places and events famous in history, song, and story. These events form a fifth natural resource of the Daniel Boone National Forest. I would like to describe very briefly some of the major sites, and the happenings which made them famous. I THE ROWAN COUNTY WAR THE TOLLIVER.MARTIN FEUD--1884-1887 August, 1884 In an election brawl in Morehead, Kentucky, involving a number of individuals who had been drinking, and including John Martin and his friend Soloman Bradley, both Republicans, and Floyd Tolliver, a Democrat, shots were fired and Bradley was killed. John Martin ac- cused Floyd Tolliver of firing the shots and Floyd Tolliver accused John Martin. "The fued was on.'" The Grand Jury which met in Rowan County shortly thereafter charged Floyd Tolliver, John Martin, and John C. Day (Acting Sheriff at the time of the shooting) with malicious shooting, wounding, and murder. November, 1884 During the November term of court in Rowan County, at which the 26 1968] Daniel Boone National Forest 27 case involving the three individuals charged above was to be tried, Floyd Tolliver and John Martin, both of whom had been drinking, met in the Gait House, Morehead, Kentucky, had "words" -- pistols flashed -- Floyd Tolliver was killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana – Land of the Indians
    Indiana – Land of the Indians Key Objectives State Parks and Reservoirs Featured In this unit students will learn about American Indian tribes ■ Pokagon State Park stateparks.IN.gov/2973.htm in early Indiana and explore the causes of removal of three ■ Tippecanoe River State Park stateparks.IN.gov/2965.htm American Indian groups from Indiana, their resettlement ■ Prophetstown State Park stateparks.IN.gov/2971.htm during the 1830s, and what life is like today for these tribes. ■ Mississinewa Lake stateparks.IN.gov/2955.htm Activity: Standards: Benchmarks: Assessment Tasks: Key Concepts: Indiana Indian tribes Identify and describe historic Native American Indian removal groups who lived in Indiana before the time Be able to name the various American Home and Indiana rivers SS.4.1.2 of early European exploration, including ways Indian tribes who called Indiana home Language “Home” and what that the groups adapted to and interacted with and where in the state they lived. it means the physical environment. Indiana Indians today Explain the importance of major transporta- Identify important rivers in Indiana tion routes, including rivers, in the exploration, SS.4.3.9 and explain their value to people and settlement and growth of Indiana, and in the parks across time. state’s location as a crossroad of America. Understand that the way we write and Consult reference materials, both print and pronounce Indian words is different ELA.4.RV.2.5 digital, to find the pronunciation and clarify than how they may have originally been the precise meanings of words and phrases. spoken. Be able to describe the reasons why the American Indians were removed Identify and explain the causes of the removal and where they ended up settling, and Disruption SS.4.1.5 of Native American Indian groups in the state understand the lifeways and landscape of Tribal Life and their resettlement during the 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management Plan for the Native Walleye of Kentucky
    Conservation and Management Plan for the Native Walleye of Kentucky Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Fisheries Division December 2014 Conservation and Management Plan for the Native Walleye of Kentucky Prepared by: David P. Dreves Fisheries Program Coordinator and the Native Walleye Management Committee of the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Fisheries Division 1 Sportsman’s Lane Frankfort, KY 40601 ii Native Walleye Management Committee Members (Listed in Alphabetical Order) David Baker Jay Herrala Fisheries Biologist II Fisheries Program Coordinator KDFWR KDFWR 1 Sportsman’s Ln. 1 Sportsman’s Ln. Frankfort, KY 40601 Frankfort, KY 40601 Eric Cummins Rod Middleton Fisheries Program Coordinator Fish Hatchery Manager KDFWR, Southwestern District Office KDFWR, Minor Clark Fish Hatchery 970 Bennett Ln. 120 Fish Hatchery Rd. Bowling Green, KY 42104 Morehead, KY 40351 David P. Dreves Jeff Ross Fisheries Program Coordinator Assistant Director of Fisheries KDFWR KDFWR 1 Sportsman’s Ln. 1 Sportsman’s Ln. Frankfort, KY 40601 Frankfort, KY 40601 Kevin Frey John Williams Fisheries Program Coordinator Fisheries Program Coordinator KDFWR, Eastern District Office KDFWR, Southeastern District Office 2744 Lake Rd. 135 Realty Lane Prestonsburg, KY 41653 Somerset, KY 42501 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1 History .............................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Notable Local Floods of 1942-43
    Notable Local Floods of 1942-43 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1134 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 CONTENTS The letters in parenthesis preceding the titles are those used to designate the separate chapters] Page (A) Flood of August 4-5, 1943, in central West Virginia, by H. M. Erskine. 1 (B) Floods of July 18, 1942, in north-central Pennsylvania, by William S. Eisenlohr, Jr________________________________________________ 59 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of points where flood determinations were made__________--_-_--__-_-_-_--__-_ 48 2. Map of flood area showing locations of stream-gaging stations, rainfall-measurement points, and isohyetal lines for July 17-18, 1942-____-___________________-___-______--_-_-____- In pocket FIGURE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of Little Kanawha River basin_________________________-__-__--_-_---_-_ 2 2. Residence of Yeager family, which was flooded. ____________ 5 3. Residence, near Heaters, which was washed dowiistream_____ 6 4. Washed-out railroad bridge on Copen Run _________________ 6 5. Washed-out fill on State Route 5 at Jobs Run______________ 7 6. Rock and mud deposit from a hillside wash________________ 7 7. Typical sand and gravel deposits__________________________ 8 8. Typical hillside erosion_____________________-_____-__--__ 8 9. Cornfield destroyed by flood. _--_____________-__-__-_-__- 9 10. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall July 26-30, 1943__________________--_-____--- 10 11. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall August 4-5, 1943__ ______________-___-_--__--__ 13 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachia's Natural Gas Counties Contributing More to the U.S
    Appalachia's Natural Gas Counties Contributing more to the U.S. economy and getting less in return The Natural Gas Fracking Boom and Appalachia's Lost Economic Decade (Updated February 12, 2021)* Contact: Sean O'Leary [email protected] 603-661-3586 OhioRiverValleyInsitute.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Welcome to Frackalachia..................................................................................................................................................7 Frackalachia's Economic Performance Ohio.................................................................................................................................................................................11 Pennsylvania...............................................................................................................................................................12 West Virginia...............................................................................................................................................................13 Implications.........................................................................................................................................................................16 References..........................................................................................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Indiana
    Comparing and Contrasting Illinois and Indiana Name: _________________________ Illinois Located in the Midwestern United States, Illinois is known as the Land of Lincoln because Abraham Lincoln made the state capital, Springfield, his home for many years before he was president. Illinois became America’s 21st state on December 3, 1818. It borders Michigan, Indiana, Iowa, Wisconsin, Missouri, and Kentucky. Its northeast coast borders Lake Michigan, making it one of the Great Lake states as well. Illinois is largely grasslands and prairies. The Mississippi River forms its eastern border and the Ohio River forms its southern border. Chicago is the largest city in Illinois and the third largest city in the entire country. It is nicknamed the “Windy City” because of the harsh winds that form off of Lake Michigan and streak through the city in winter. Chicago’s Sears Tower was once the tallest building in the world. With over 12.5 million people, Illinois is the nation’s sixth largest state by population. Its state bird, the cardinal, is also the state bird of six other states. Indiana Indiana became America’s 19th state on December 11, 1816. It is nicknamed the Hoosier State. The origin of the word “Hoosier” remains unknown, but today it refers to a citizen of Indiana and has been in use since as early as 1833. Indiana is located in the Midwestern United States and borders Michigan, Illinois, Ohio, and Kentucky. Its northwestern coast borders Lake Michigan, thus, making it one of the Great Lakes states as well. The Ohio River forms its southern border between it and Kentucky.
    [Show full text]