DOCSLIB.ORG

Notable Local Floods of 1942-43

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notable Local Floods of 1942-43 Notable Local Floods of 1942-43 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1134 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 CONTENTS The letters in parenthesis preceding the titles are those used to designate the separate chapters] Page (A) Flood of August 4-5, 1943, in central West Virginia, by H. M. Erskine. 1 (B) Floods of July 18, 1942, in north-central Pennsylvania, by William S. Eisenlohr, Jr________________________________________________ 59 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of points where flood determinations were made__________--_-_--__-_-_-_--__-_ 48 2. Map of flood area showing locations of stream-gaging stations, rainfall-measurement points, and isohyetal lines for July 17-18, 1942-____-___________________-___-______--_-_-____- In pocket FIGURE 1. Map of West Virginia showing location of Little Kanawha River basin_________________________-__-__--_-_---_-_ 2 2. Residence of Yeager family, which was flooded. ____________ 5 3. Residence, near Heaters, which was washed dowiistream_____ 6 4. Washed-out railroad bridge on Copen Run _________________ 6 5. Washed-out fill on State Route 5 at Jobs Run______________ 7 6. Rock and mud deposit from a hillside wash________________ 7 7. Typical sand and gravel deposits__________________________ 8 8. Typical hillside erosion_____________________-_____-__--__ 8 9. Cornfield destroyed by flood. _--_____________-__-__-_-__- 9 10. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall July 26-30, 1943__________________--_-____--- 10 11. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall August 4-5, 1943__ ______________-___-_--__--__ 13 12. Discharge hydrographs at stream-gaging stations on Little Kanawha River July 26 to August 9, 1943_ ______________ 18 13. Discharge hydrographs at stream-gaging stations on tribu­ taries of Little Kanawha River July 26 to August 9, 1943__ 19 14. Map of Little Kanawha River basin showing location of points where determinations of flood discharge were made_______ 30 15. Relation of unit discharge in Little Kanawha River basin to size of drainage basin-__-_----__-_-_-_--_-_--------- 31 16. Flood profiles of Little Kanawha River____________________ 34 17. Business section of Burnsville during flood of April 16, 1939-_ 37 18. Part of flooded section of Glenville during flood of April 1939__ 37 19. Isohyetal map of Little Kanawha River basin showing total rainfall April 14-18, 1939__-_-_-_--________________ 38 20. Hourly precipitation at recording rain gages April 14-18, 1939________________________________________________ 39 CONTENTS Page FIGURE 21. Graph of daily mean discharge of Little Kanawha River at Grantsville, March 26 to April 25, 1939-______________ 40 22. Stages reached by floods exceeding 23 feet at Glenville, 1901-43^ __ __________________-_-____-____-___ 42 23. Monthly distribution of floods exceeding 23 feet at Glenville, 1901-43-______________-____-_--------____-_-_-_-_-__ 45 24. Recurrence interval of floods on Little Kanawha River at Glenville, 1901-43-_______________________-__. 45 25. Relation of unit discharges in table 9 to size of drainage basin______________________________________________ 48 26. Index map showing location of flood area __________________ 60 27. Dam of Williamsoii Pulp & Paper Co., Austin, Pa., breached by flood. _____________________________________________ 61 28. Buildings in Austin, destroyed by flood____________________ 62 29. Houses in Johnsonburg, Pa., swept off their foundations and pushed together.___________________----_______-_---__ 63 30. Bridge of Coudersport & Port Allegaiiy R. R. damaged by flood.______.__-____---__-_____-----_-_-_____ 63 31. Baltimore and Ohio R. R. tracks along First Fork Sinnema- honing Creek torn up by flood ________________________ 64 32. Questionnaire used for recording miscellaneous rainfall infor­ mation ______________________________________________ 73 33. Upstream end of debris cone on Taylor Farm, formed during flood.-__---___-______-_---_-____--_____________ 76 34. Blow-out hole near Port Allegany_________________-_-_____ 77 35. Distribution of rainfall at recording-gage stations___________ 82 36. Relation between percent of total rainfall and minimum time required for its occurrence------------------------- 87 37. Glass jar, on Appolt farm, that overflowed after catching 30.8 inches of rain_ -___-____________---_______-_----__ 115 38. Old and new drainage channels on Appolt farm near Port Allegany___________________________________________ 118 39. Upper critical-depth section on Taylor farm________________ 119 40. Slope-area reach on Nelson Run__________________________ 120 41. Bridge opening on Allegheny River at Port Allegany used for contra cted-opening measurement _______________________ 121 42. Comparative hydrographs of flood flows in Susquehanna and Allegheny Rivers drainage basins. ______________________ 122 43. Flood discharge, in second-feet per square mile, in relation to drainage area______________________________________ 144 o Floods of July 18,1942 in North-Central Pennsylvania By W. S. EISENLOHR, JR. Notable Local Floods of 1942-43 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1134-B Prepared in cooperation with the States of New York and Pennsylvania With a section on Descriptive Details of the Storm and Floods By J. E. STEWART JNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 75 cents (paper cover) PREFACE The floods of July 18, 1942, in north-central Pennsylvania were extraordinary. The enormous volume of rain that fell during the storm and produced these floods seems almost unbelievable. For that reason considerable space has been devoted to descriptions of previous historic storms and floods of the same type. The similarity of the eye-witness accounts is striking. It is hoped that this documen­ tation will contribute to a more reliable knowledge of these extraordinarily great floods. The field work and collection and tabulation of the basic information on stages and discharges for the flood was done in the Harrisburg, Pa., and Albany, N. Y., districts of the Surface Water Branch under the direction of J. W. Mangan and A. W. Harrington, district engineers, respectively. Hollister Johnson, hydraulic engineer, at that time assigned to the Albany district, had immediate supervision of the miscellaneous measurements of peak discharge made in that district, and reviewed most of those made in Pennsylvania. He also obtained the information about previous floods at Salamanca, N. Y. W. S. Eisenlohr, Jr., assisted in some of the measurements of flood flow and prepared the report in the Technical Co­ ordination Branch under the general direction of R. W. Davenport, chief; he also supplied photographs for the report. Substantial and important contributions to the collection of field information and to the report were made, as noted, by James E. Stewart, hydraulic engineer, now with the West Perm Power Co., who as a young engineer with the Geological Survey was greatly interested in floods. The great number of miscellaneous rain­ fall measurements are largely the result of his efforts, and his contributions to this report are gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are also due the West Penn Power Co. for making available the results of Mr. Stewart's work. The Corps of Engineers and the Weather Bureau cooperated in the collection of meteorologic information and made it available for these reports; the Corps of Engineers also furnished the results of four peak-discharge measurements. The stream-gaging work in the two districts of the Geological Survey was per­ formed in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters and the New York State Department of Public Works. CONTENTS Abstract- ___________________________________________________________ 59 Introduction- _____________________________________________________ 59 Descriptive details of the storm and floods, by James E. Stewart_________ 66 Description of the storm________-______________________________- 66 Previous extraordinary storms___________________________________ 68 Storm of July 26, 1819________________________.____________ 68 Storm of August 5, 1843__________________________________ 69 Storm of July 5, 1939______________________________________ 70. Collection of rainfall records____________________________________ 71 Flood waves__________________________________________________ 74 Debris movements, blow-outs, and slides _________________________ 75 Meteorology of the storm___________________________________________ 78 Description.__________________________________________________ 78 Rainfall records__________________________ _____________________ 81 The isohyetal map_____-_-_____________________________________ 114 Area-depth relations ___________________________________________ 116 Flood flows-______________________________________________________ 117 Stages and discharges at stream-gaging stations _______________________ 123 Susquehanna River drainage basin_______-_-__________-_--______- 124 Canacadea Creek near Hornell, N. ¥_________________________ 124 Karr Valley Creek at Almond, N. ¥_________________________ 125 West Branch Susquehanna River at Karthaus, Pa----_-------- 126 West Branch Susquehanna River at Renovo, Pa_------------- 127 Sinnemahoning Creek at Sinnemahoning, Pa__________________ 128 Driftwood
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Little Kanawha Byway
    Little Kanawha Byway Perhaps the most accessible of all of West Virginia’s byways, the Little Kanawha Byway is bookended by I-77 and I-79. Starting in the west at I-77, the parkway begins its journey in Mineral Wells and mirrors the banks of the Little Kanawha River. Being totally paved, this roadway is perfect for RVs and others wanting a smooth ride so they can take in all of the beautiful pastoral sites. Hughes River Wildlife Management Area The byway passes the Hughes River Wildlife Management Area (WMA). This 10,000-acre WMA allows hunting for turkey, deer, grouse, squirrel, and rabbit. The nearby Hughes River, along with the Little Kanawha, is filled with muskellunge, smallmouth bass, and channel catfish perfect for a weekend fishing trip. Burning Springs Further along the river, the town of Burning Springs was once one of the major hubs of the American oil industry. In 1859, and later in the 1890s, the area around Burning Springs and Parkersburg was literally seeping with oil just beneath the surface. These oil strikes turned many men into millionaires in only a few months until the shallow wells ran dry. For those interested in seeing a piece of the Mountain State’s oil history, The Parkersburg Oil & Gas Museum is restoring one of the old derricks that stood above the oilfields in Burning Springs. Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area At the eastern edge of the byway, the beautiful lake and surrounding protected fields and forests of the Burnsville Lake Wildlife Management Area provide a welcome respite from the hurried pace of today’s world.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAVELTIME and DISPERSION DATA for the KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA, 1989 by D.H. Appel U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report
    TRAVELTIME AND DISPERSION DATA FOR THE KANAWHA RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA, 1989 By D.H. Appel U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 91-57 Prepared in cooperation with the MARSHALL UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION and the VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL ENDOWMENT Charleston, West Virginia 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Dire ptor For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books a.nd Open-File Reports Section Water Resources Division Box 25425 603 Morris Street Denver Federal Center Charleston, WV 24301 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ............................................. 2 Acknowledgments ............................................... 5 Field procedures .................................................. 5 Traveltime and dispersion data .................................... 7 August 1989 ................................................... 7 October 1989 .................................................. 7 References cited .................................................. 16 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing the Kanawha River study area ............... 3 2. Graph showing Kanawha River profile, navigable section .................................... 4 TABLES Page Table 1. Distance, in river miles, to selected sites
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Buffalo Bridge Buffalo, West Virginia
    Merit Award: Long Span Lower Buffalo Bridge Buffalo, West Virginia This $21.8 million project con- nects US 35 to WV62 over the Kanawha River near Buffalo, West Virginia. The bridge site is in the Kanawha Valley of Putnam County, West Virginia, halfway between Charleston, the state’s capital and largest city, and Huntington, the sec- ond largest city in the state. The broad Kanawha Valley is surrounded by rolling hills and dotted with farm- ing communities and newer subur- ban areas. Although Putnam County is one of the fastest growing counties in the state of West Virginia, there was no bridge crossing the Kanawha River within miles of Buffalo. The new Lower Buffalo Bridge opens up some of the best land in the state to economic development and provides a direct connection to a new US 35 upgrade under construction and I- 64. The bridge had to be completed and open to traffic by mid-1998 to allow for the new Toyota manufacturing facility in Buffalo to ship state-of-the-art engines. The bridge also had to span the naviga- ble Kanawha River with minimal false- work and span over areas on both banks with known archeological deposits. Environmental Concerns The flood plain area at the Lower Buffalo Bridge site is an established archeological dig site with numerous Native American campsites and artifacts. An environmental consultant for the West Virginia Department of Transportation (WVDOT) performed both phase one and phase two archeo- logical surveys at the proposed bridge site and identified archeologically sensitive areas on both riverbanks. Construction activity for a new bridge over these sensi- tive areas was limited to the depth of cul- tivation (about 30”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730--1795
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2005 The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795 Richard S. Grimes West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Grimes, Richard S., "The emergence and decline of the Delaware Indian nation in western Pennsylvania and the Ohio country, 1730--1795" (2005). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 4150. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/4150 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Emergence and Decline of the Delaware Indian Nation in Western Pennsylvania and the Ohio Country, 1730-1795 Richard S. Grimes Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Mary Lou Lustig, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Mussel Survey in the Susquehanna River in the Vicinity of the Proposed Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Site
    Controlled Document Mussel Survey in the Susquehanna River in the Vicinity of the Proposed Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Site, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania TABLE OF CONTENTS RECORD OF REVISIONS .......................................................................................... I INTRO DUCTIO N ...................................................................................................... 2 MET HO DS ...................................................................................................................... 2 R ES ULT S ....................................................................................................................... 3 CO NCLUSIO NS ...................................................................................................... 4 R E FER EN C ES ................................................................................................................ 6 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the proposed BBNPP and the mussel survey stations in the Susquehanna River. LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Species of mussels observed during a survey of the Susquehanna River completed near the proposed BBNP site, October 2007. i Controlled Document Mussel Survey in the Susquehanna River in the Vicinity of the ProposedBell Bend Nuclear Power Plant Site, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania RECORD OF REVISIONS Pages/Sections Revision Date Changed Brief Description October All Initial release 2008 001 June 2010 All Added report title to header and revision number to footer 001 June 2010 Figure 1 Deleted 001 June
    [Show full text]
  • History of Virginia
    14 Facts & Photos Profiles of Virginia History of Virginia For thousands of years before the arrival of the English, vari- other native peoples to form the powerful confederacy that con- ous societies of indigenous peoples inhabited the portion of the trolled the area that is now West Virginia until the Shawnee New World later designated by the English as “Virginia.” Ar- Wars (1811-1813). By only 1646, very few Powhatans re- chaeological and historical research by anthropologist Helen C. mained and were policed harshly by the English, no longer Rountree and others has established 3,000 years of settlement even allowed to choose their own leaders. They were organized in much of the Tidewater. Even so, a historical marker dedi- into the Pamunkey and Mattaponi tribes. They eventually cated in 2015 states that recent archaeological work at dissolved altogether and merged into Colonial society. Pocahontas Island has revealed prehistoric habitation dating to about 6500 BCE. The Piscataway were pushed north on the Potomac River early in their history, coming to be cut off from the rest of their peo- Native Americans ple. While some stayed, others chose to migrate west. Their movements are generally unrecorded in the historical record, As of the 16th Century, what is now the state of Virginia was but they reappear at Fort Detroit in modern-day Michigan by occupied by three main culture groups: the Iroquoian, the East- the end of the 18th century. These Piscataways are said to have ern Siouan and the Algonquian. The tip of the Delmarva Penin- moved to Canada and probably merged with the Mississaugas, sula south of the Indian River was controlled by the who had broken away from the Anishinaabeg and migrated Algonquian Nanticoke.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2010 The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Linh Diem Phu Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Phu, Linh Diem, "The aN tural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia" (2010). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 787. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Natural History & Distribution of Riverine Turtles in West Virginia Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences By Linh Diem Phu Dr. Thomas K. Pauley, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson Dr. Dan Evans, Ph.D. Dr. Suzanne Strait, Ph.D. Marshall University May 2010 Abstract Turtles are unique evolutionary marvels that evolved from amphibians and developed their protective shelled form more than 200 million years ago. In West Virginia, there are 10 native species of turtles, 9 of which are aquatic. Most of these aquatic turtles feed on carrion and dead plant matter, in the water and essentially "clean" our water systems. Turtles are long-lived animals with sensitive life stages that can serve as both long-term and short-term bioindicators of environmental health. With the increase in commercial trade, habitat fragmentation, degradation, destruction, there has been a marked decline in turtle species.
    [Show full text]
  • Australians at the First Battle of El Alamein
    Road to Ruin: The 9th Australian Division and the First Battle of El Alamein, July 1942. Nicole Townsend Abstract Throughout July 1942, the Allies made numerous attempts to break through the Axis lines at El Alamein, however, these operations were largely unsuccessful and failed to achieve a decisive victory. On 27 July, a final assault against enemy lines was launched with the aim of capturing the key feature of Miteiriya Ridge, commonly referred to as Ruin Ridge. Although the operation met with initial success, the operation ended in complete disaster as the British and Australian infantry involved were surrounded by German tanks and forced to surrender. During this single operation, over 1000 men were lost. The 2/28th Australian Infantry Battalion was virtually wiped out whilst the British 69th Brigade suffered casualties of more than 600 men. Using archival sources held by the Australian War Memorial, this paper analyses the disaster at Ruin Ridge to determine what went wrong. It will be argued that the failure of the operation was due largely to poor operational planning and the failure of armoured support to materialise as planned. Introduction A seemingly innocuous railway siding located approximately 100 kilometres west of the key port city of Alexandria on Egypt’s Mediterranean coast, El Alamein was the site of three key battles between July and November 1942. The 9th Australian Division played a significant role in each of the three battles, suffering particularly heavy casualties in both the first and third battles. Though the third and final battle (which the Allies would call the second battle of El Alamein) would live on in memory as the most significant, with the battle consistently heralded as a major turning point in the Mediterranean theatre, the July operations under Field Marshal Claude Auchinleck were equally significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of West Virginia
    Bulletin No. 233 Series F, Geography, 41 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIKECTOU A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA I-IEISTRY G-AN3STETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1904 A» cl O a 3. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTEKIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, D. C. , March 9, 190Jh SIR: I have the honor to transmit herewith, for publication as a bulletin, a gazetteer of West Virginia! Very respectfully, HENRY GANNETT, Geogwvpher. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 3 A GAZETTEER OF WEST VIRGINIA. HENRY GANNETT. DESCRIPTION OF THE STATE. The State of West Virginia was cut off from Virginia during the civil war and was admitted to the Union on June 19, 1863. As orig­ inally constituted it consisted of 48 counties; subsequently, in 1866, it was enlarged by the addition -of two counties, Berkeley and Jeffer­ son, which were also detached from Virginia. The boundaries of the State are in the highest degree irregular. Starting at Potomac River at Harpers Ferry,' the line follows the south bank of the Potomac to the Fairfax Stone, which was set to mark the headwaters of the North Branch of Potomac River; from this stone the line runs due north to Mason and Dixon's line, i. e., the southern boundary of Pennsylvania; thence it follows this line west to the southwest corner of that State, in approximate latitude 39° 43i' and longitude 80° 31', and from that corner north along the western boundary of Pennsylvania until the line intersects Ohio River; from this point the boundary runs southwest down the Ohio, on the northwestern bank, to the mouth of Big Sandy River.
    [Show full text]
  • Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was made possible by the support of the following organizations and individuals: Center for Excellence in Disabilities at West Virginia University, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center West Virginia Assistive Technology System (WVATS) West Virginia Division of Natural Resources West Virginia Division of Tourism Partnerships in Assistive Technologies, Inc. (PATHS) Special thanks to Stephen K. Hardesty and Brittany Valdez for their enthusiasm while working on this Guide. 1 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 3 • How to Use This Guide ......................................... 4 • ADA Sites .............................................................. 5 • Types of Fish ......................................................... 7 • Traveling in West Virginia ...................................... 15 COUNTY INDEX .......................................................... 19 ACTIVITY LISTS • Public Access Sites ............................................... 43 • Lakes ..................................................................... 53 • Trout Fishing ......................................................... 61 • River Float Trips .................................................... 69 SITE INDEX ................................................................. 75 SITE DESCRIPTIONS .................................................. 83 APPENDICES A. Recreation Organizations ......................................207 B. Trout Stocking Schedule .......................................209
    [Show full text]
  • A Native History of Kentucky
    A Native History Of Kentucky by A. Gwynn Henderson and David Pollack Selections from Chapter 17: Kentucky in Native America: A State-by-State Historical Encyclopedia edited by Daniel S. Murphree Volume 1, pages 393-440 Greenwood Press, Santa Barbara, CA. 2012 1 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW As currently understood, American Indian history in Kentucky is over eleven thousand years long. Events that took place before recorded history are lost to time. With the advent of recorded history, some events played out on an international stage, as in the mid-1700s during the war between the French and English for control of the Ohio Valley region. Others took place on a national stage, as during the Removal years of the early 1800s, or during the events surrounding the looting and grave desecration at Slack Farm in Union County in the late 1980s. Over these millennia, a variety of American Indian groups have contributed their stories to Kentucky’s historical narrative. Some names are familiar ones; others are not. Some groups have deep historical roots in the state; others are relative newcomers. All have contributed and are contributing to Kentucky's American Indian history. The bulk of Kentucky’s American Indian history is written within the Commonwealth’s rich archaeological record: thousands of camps, villages, and town sites; caves and rockshelters; and earthen and stone mounds and geometric earthworks. After the mid-eighteenth century arrival of Europeans in the state, part of Kentucky’s American Indian history can be found in the newcomers’ journals, diaries, letters, and maps, although the native voices are more difficult to hear.
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca Indian Tribe History
    Seneca Indian Tribe History Seneca ('place of the stone,' the Anglicized form of the Dutch enunciation of the Mohegan rendering of the Iroquoian ethnic appellative Oneida, or, strictly, Oněñiute'ā'kā', and with a different ethnic suffix, (Oněñriute'roñ'non', meaning 'people of the standing or projecting rock or stone') A prominent and influential tribe of the Iroquois (q. v.). When first known they occupied that part of west New York between Seneca lake and Geneva river, having their council fire at Tsonontowan, near Naples, in Ontario county. After the political destruction of the Erie and Neuters, about the middle of the seventeenth century, the Seneca and other Iroquois people carried their settlements westward to Lake Erie and southward along the Alleghany into Pennsylvania. They also received into their tribe a portion of these conquered peoples, by which accessions they became the largest tribe of the confederation and one of the most important. They are now chiefly settled on the Allegany, Cattaraugus, and Tonawanda reservations, N.Y. A portion of them remained under British jurisdiction after the declaration of peace and live on Grand River reservation, Ontario. Various local bands have been known as Buffalo, Tonawanda, and Cornplanter Indians; and the Mingo, formerly in Ohio, have become officially known as Seneca from the large number of that tribe among them. No considerable number of the Seneca ever joined the Catholic Iroquois colonies. In the third quarter of the 16th century the Seneca was the last but one of the Iroquois tribes to give its suffrage in favor of the abolition of murder and war, the suppression of cannibalism, and the establishment of the principles upon which the League of the Iroquois was founded.
    [Show full text]