DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Transit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Transit 7.1. Support a Fully Accessible Transit System with Double Platforms The existing conditions at the commuter rail stops fail to provide basic elements for the needs of people, especially those with mobility challenges, visual impairment, and/ –7– or hearing impairment. People who rely on wheelchairs, strollers, walkers, or who cannot easily traverse stairs are fully excluded from being able to use the commuter rail. Accessing the rail platform requires walking down a long Regional and steep flight of stairs to a platform that has no shelter from sun or winter wind, limited seating, limited lighting, Transit no immediate restrooms, no elevators or escalators, is lacking signage, and has no immediate human assistance. Similarly, several of the bus stops along Washington Street are simply edges of roadway marked by a bus stop sign: no shelter, no seating, poorly located, and inaccessible for pedestrian crossing due to lack of crosswalks and multiple lanes of fast-moving traffic. The MBTA has known funding shortages, and for the three stations in Newton, there remains an estimated $35 million Washington Street’s villages need funding gap. If a prospective $50 million dollar project happens, Newton would get one ADA accessible platform better service via regional transit. at each of its three stations (Newtonville, West Newton, Commuter stations and bus stops and Auburndale). There is no increase in frequency of service proposed. The current level of weekday service, are inhospitable for many, and often according to the MBTA’s schedule, is 12 inbound trips and entirely inaccessible for people 14 outbound trips daily. To get the level of regional transit that a city directly adjacent to Boston should have, the with mobility challenges, visual, City should leverage new development to generate enough or hearing impairment. Service is tax revenue to contribute to station improvements. infrequent, and bus routes miss key ACTIONS regional destinations. Significant A. Prioritize funding for a fully accessible transit investments are needed to reach a system level of equity for all people. B. Utilize economic development tools to include station and related infrastructure improvements. C. Work with State legislators, other municipalities, and other stakeholders to advance schedule and funding for Commuter Rail. D. Peer review MBTA Station designs to identify lower cost options for better accessibility and services. WASHINGTON STREET VISION PLAN - DRAFT 04.22.19 59 The New Balance Story Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) projects have long-range planning for the MBTA, which addresses the the potential to bring significant investment to Newton link between transit-oriented development and new or which can be leveraged to address the City's pressing improved transit stations: “Infill stations have the greatest needs: increased infrastructure investments to support potential where private partners are considering major public transit options, diversity of housing, and increased employment centers and/or residential development, open space and parks. TOD projects often bring jobs or where major highways intersect the commuter rail particular businesses to a community, which can help network, or where there is significant transit oriented fund transit improvements. Businesses are increasingly development potential.” New Balance Development cited focused on public transit options for their workforce, and concerns with providing parking, particularly structured examples show that they will work with cities to achieve parking, commensurate with the amenities offered by these goals. Newton has the potential to consider TOD the development, thus placing the focus on a new public projects at Crafts Street and/or West Newton Station. transit option. Read on for more information about a successful nearby TOD. New Balance cited one of four major considerations for the Boston Landing Station as the following: “To The creation of the Boston Landing MBTA commuter attract a more youthful workforce that prefers to work rail stop was integral to the development of the Boston in locations that are accessible to transit, bike, and Landing development in Brighton, MA. The stop, located pedestrian facilities.” Employees are looking for flexibility, between Yawkey and Newtonville, was privately financed shorter commutes, and easy access to amenities in and by New Balance Development, the development arm of surrounding their working environment. Real estate New Balance. New Balance Development pointed to the companies such as CBRE have recognized that office removal of the Allston commuter rail stop in 1959 to make tenant satisfaction is linked to the tenant’s ability to attract way for the turnpike project as a step in the decline of the and retain talent. Office spaces are changing to reflect the area surrounding the development site. wants and needs of the next generation of workers, as While other state- and city-funded rail projects evidenced by New Balance’s focus on the thriving work/ languished, the Boston Landing station public-private life landscape of the Boston Landing development. partnership completed the project in just four years, from announcement to ribbon cutting. The essence of the story has found its way into MassDOT’s Focus40 CHAPTER 2 — BIG IDEAS + ACTIONS 60 7.2 Extend Subway Service on the Commuter Rail tracks and Connect the Green Line to Riverside Station Adding a new urban rail T line would be a big service. A new Yellow Line could connect the Green Line transportation move, creating an unprecedented public at Riverside by a small segment of existing rail. With the benefit for Newton that has sweeping implications for potential westernmost starting point of Riverside, the new improving people's quality of life who live and commute Yellow Line could have a new stop at Newton Corner and in Newton. A number of residents and staff of the City of include additional potential new stops at West Station/ Newton identified the extension of a new rail rapid transit Boston University, MIT, Kendall Square, Cambridge route as a high-value win for regional transportation, Street, Union Square, and onward to North Station or effectively creating an urban ring of subway service. Everett. However, MBTA's Focus 40 plan indicates a lack of ambition to move such initiatives forward stating, “The ACTIONS speed and adoption of technology, the impact of climate change, municipal land use policies, demographic A. Initiate discussions with regional stakeholders shifts, and mobility preferences are largely out of the such the City of Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, MBTA’s control.” This kind of improvement will take a MassDOT and Executive Office of Housing and considerable level of investment and needs the initiative Development to discuss creation of the Yellow of the City and private stakeholders to move forward. Line (pictured at right). The current frequency of service to Newton on the MBTA B. Explore other intra-Newton transit options, such Framingham/Worcester line is limited. Extension of the as shared bicycle services, and other ways to get MBTA “Yellow Line” west to Auburndale could create around locally without a vehicle. significant improvements in frequency and range of The Yellow Line was envisioned as part of the discussion about Boston hosting the Olympics. Other versions of this idea have surfaced in the past as well, all with the basic idea to utilize the Commuter Rail tracks in Newton for more frequent subway style service that is more like the Red Line. WASHINGTON STREET VISION PLAN - DRAFT 04.22.19 61 7.3 Extend Bus Service to Connect Under- Served Areas to Important Destinations and Rail Transit Prior to the Public Design Week, the design team created a transit analysis map to show residential homes within a 10-minute walk (1/2 mile) and 5-minute bike ride (1 mile) of a commuter rail station, and 5-minute walk (1/4 mile) to a bus station. Bus routes originate in Waltham and are focused predominantly on east-west travel corridors. Lines merge for brief segments allowing limited opportunities to transfer from one line to another. Bus routes do not provide comprehensive service to the neighborhoods located north and south of the turnpike. Residents expressed a desire to see bus transit expanded to provide more opportunities, and routing to connect to important regional destinations such as Riverside Station and Newton Wellesley Hospital. ACTION A. Work with MBTA and other stakeholders such as Newton Wellesley Hospital and Newton Council on Aging to identify opportunities to adjust existing routing and service to provide better transit coverage and connectivity between neighborhoods and to regional destinations. TRANSIT ACCESS Within a 10 minute walk of a Commuter Rail Station Within a 5 minute walk of a Bus Station Bus Stations Commuter Rail Stations CHAPTER 2 — BIG IDEAS + ACTIONS 62.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Actions to Transform Mobility
    Actions to Transform Mobility TRANSPORT KENDALL Navigating the Growth and Transformation of Kendall Square Introduction The Kendall Square has undergone a dramatic transformation over the past 40 years. The scientists, engineers and entrepreneurs in Kendall Square together have created one of the most dynamic innovation districts in the world. Kendall’s innovation ecosystem is dependent on the talent and resources of institutions and companies located in close proximity. Close connections to Boston’s medical centers, investment resources, and education institutions have likewise been invaluable. Kendall Square has become central to Massachusetts’s economy attracting talent from every corner of the state, however Kendall is not as geographically central within the regional transit system as downtown Boston. Despite this, Kendall has grown from one red line station into a model transit-oriented development district with a truly multi-modal commute pattern, supported by the City of Cambridge’s progressive parking and transportation demand policies. Kendall has spurred the emergence of new districts focused on life science and technology innovation throughout the region. The state’s economic growth is dependent on reliable transportation connections between where people live and work. Transport Kendall seeks to maintain and enhance the transit-oriented development model in Cambridge. To do this, Transport Kendall promotes future investment in the transit system to serve this economic hub, while relieving congestion and supporting regional
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Advisory Committee Minutes November 2014
    CITY OF CAMBRIDGE TRANSIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES Date, Time & Place: November 5, 2014, 5:30-7:30 PM Cambridge Citywide Senior Center, 2nd floor Kitchen Classroom Attendance Committee Members John Attanucci, Kelley Brown, Brian Dacey, Charles Fineman, Jim Gascoigne, Eric Hoke, Doug Manz, George Metzger, Katherine Rafferty, Simon Shapiro, Saul Tannenbaum, Ritesh Warade City of Cambridge Adam Shulman (Traffic, Parking and Transportation); Tegin Teich Bennett, Susanne Rasmussen, Jennifer Lawrence, and Cleo Stoughton (Community Development Department) 1 member of the public was present. Committee Introductions and Approve Minutes Attachment: Draft October minutes Committee Updates Kendall Square Mobility Task Force RFR released Tegin informed the Committee that MassDOT had released an RFR to form a Kendall Square Transportation Task Force to identify short-, medium-, and long-term projects and policy initiatives to improve transportation in Kendall Square. BRT Study Group meeting October 17, 2014 Tegin updated the Committee on the progress of a study group to look at the feasibility of implementing BRT in Boston. Updates on MBTA coordination: Transit Service Analysis, EV technology The City has been discussing the progress of implementing bus priority treatments at a couple locations in Boston and has asked for information on their effectiveness. The MBTA is interested in piloting electric vehicle technology and the City is working with them to help identify possible funding sources. Pearl Street Reconnection and Dana Park Hubway solicitation for input The City is seeking input on the Pearl Street Reconstruction project. More information can be found here: https://www.cambridgema.gov/theworks/cityprojects/2014/pearlstreetreconstruction.aspx. The City is seeking input on options for the long-term location of the Dana Park Hubway station.
    [Show full text]
  • South Station Expansion Project
    On page 2 of the WWTR, the Proponent reports in the Boston Water & Sewer Commission's (BWSC) assessment that there is adequate capacity in its sewer mains to collect and convey the Project's new wastewater flows, which could increase wastewater fl ow contribution from the site by as much as 453,150 gallons per day (gpd) at the South Station site, an increase of 122% from existing conditions, according to the WWTR. This may be true for 5.1 dry weather flow conditions, but downstream BWSC and MWRA sewer systems serving South Station and the other project areas can surcharge and overflow during large storms, due to large volumes of stormwater entering combined sewer systems. Any increase in sanitary flow, if not offset with infiltration/inflow ("III") or stormwater removal from hydraulically related sewer systems can be expected to worsen system surcharging and overflows. The WWTR separately describes local and state regulations requiring I/I removal at a ratio of 4 gallons III removed for every new gallon of sanitary flow to ensure the mitigation of these potential impacts. The Proponent commits to 4: 1 I/I removal to offset new wastewater flows generated at the South Station site. I/I removal from hydraulically related systems may occur remote from the project site. It is imperative that the Proponent evaluate how the local sewers to which the project's flows will be connected will perform with the large added flows from the project and the III reduction that may occur far afield. Connections to the BWSC sewer 5.2 pipes should be carefully selected to ensure that any local sewer surcharging is not worsened by the new flows in a way that causes greater CSO discharges at nearby CSO regulators and outfalls,.notwithstanding the removal of extraneous flows elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston to Providence Commuter Rail Schedule
    Boston To Providence Commuter Rail Schedule Giacomo beseechings downward. Dimitrou shrieved her convert dolce, she detach it prenatally. Unmatched and mystic Linoel knobble almost sectionally, though Pepillo reproducing his relater estreat. Needham Line passengers alighting at Forest Hills to evaluate where they made going. Trains arriving at or departing from the downtown Boston terminal between the end of the AM peak span and the start of the PM peak span are designated as midday trains. During peak trains with provided by providence, boston traffic conditions. Produced by WBUR and NPR. Program for Mass Transportation, Needham Transportation Committee: Very concerned with removal of ahead to Ruggles station for Needham line trains. Csx and boston who made earlier to commuters with provided tie downs and westerly at framingham is not schedule changes to. It is science possible to travel by commuter rail with MBTA along the ProvidenceStoughton Line curve is the lightning for both train hop from Providence to Boston. Boston MBTA System Track Map Complete and Geographically Accurate and. Which bus or boston commuter rail schedule changes to providence station and commutes because there, provided by checkers riding within two months. Read your favorite comics from Comics Kingdom. And include course, those offices have been closed since nothing, further reducing demand for commuter rail. No lines feed into both the North and South Stations. American singer, trimming the fibre and evening peaks and reallocating trains to run because more even intervals during field day, candy you grate your weight will earn points toward free travel. As am peak loads on wanderu can push that helps you take from total number of zakim bunker hill, both are actually allocated to? MBTA Providence Commuter Train The MBTA Commuter Rail trains run between Boston and Providence on time schedule biased for extra working in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • I-90 Allston Scoping Report 11-6-19
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Project Area and Elements ............................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Project History .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 Overview of the NEPA Process.......................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Purpose of the Scoping Report ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Opportunity for Public Comment ................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Project Need .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts and Rhode Island Chapter Newsletter
    May 2018 Massachusetts and Rhode Island Chapter Newsletter PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE UPCOMING EDUCATION In Like A Lion, Out Like a Lion by Bud Clarke, MAI 2018 President 7 Hour National USPAP Update Course (2018 - 2019) The month of March recently came in like a lion and out like a lion, not a lamb! New England's June 7, 2018 third nor'easter in less than two weeks slammed parts of the region and dropped as much as 2 Warwick, RI feet of snow in some places and brought dangerous whiteout conditions on the roads. Solving Land Puzzles June 13, 2018 Hurricane force wind gusts were severe in places as much of coastal Massachusetts, Rhode Waltham, MA Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Maine bore the brunt of the storms. Low lying coastal areas experienced significant flooding and damage, while communities all over the Real Estate Finance Statistics and Valuation Modeling region experienced flooding, falling trees, and power outages. June 14 – 15, 2018 Woburn, MA The aftermath of these storms left damaged homes, breached seawalls, and wreckage scattered in the streets, with generator-powered pumps sucking saltwater from flooded Basic Appraisal Procedures basements. Shattered fences and broken trees littered yard after yard. June 20 – 23, 2018 Braintree, MA Disasters tend to occur suddenly, taking the public by surprise, even when the location is 7 Hour National USPAP Update known to be prone to such an occurrence. Depending on the nature of the disaster, Course (2018-2019) destruction of property may be widespread and to varying degrees. Initially, the collective June 28, 2018 Woburn, MA reaction to any disaster is shock; however eventually, there is recovery and damaged property needs to be repaired and destroyed property is often replaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Allston Yards
    Allston Yards Allston Yards May 29, 2018 Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards Site Plan Enhancements MBTA • Commuter Rail • Busses Shuttles Parking Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – April 30, 2018 plan Braintree Street Extension Building 4 Building 3 Building 1 East Street East West Street West Arthur Arthur Extension Street Lantera (residential) 52 Everett Street Building 2 38 Everett Street Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – April 30, 2018 plan Car drop-off area 5-foot wide sidewalk Building 4 Building 3 Building 1 East Street East West Street West Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – May 29, 2018 plan Car / shuttle bus 10-foot wide sidewalk drop-off area 8-foot wide landscaping Curb extensions Curb extensions Building 4 Building 3 Building 1 East Street East West Street West Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts Allston Yards – MBTA Outreach April 30, 2018 meeting Request for Boston Landing Station access enhancements Request for MBTA Route 64 modifications May 21, 2018 – four new stops added at Boston Landing: • Inbound #500 – approx. 6:04 AM • Outbound #511 – flag stop; approx. 10:31 PM • Outbound #513 – flag stop; approx. 12:11 PM • Outbound #515 – flag stop; approx. 2:16 PM Allston Yards – Allston, Massachusetts MBTA Boston Landing Station – Update Boston Landing 2013 2 AM inbound / 2 PM outbound (planned) 2017 May 22, 2017 opening 2017 October 2017 700 – 900 daily riders Tuesday April 24, 2018 = 1,153 riders 2018 19 inbound / 15 outbound stops 20
    [Show full text]
  • By Thomas Jensen May 11, 2018 - Appraisal & Consulting
    Boston Landing - A public private partnership success- by Thomas Jensen May 11, 2018 - Appraisal & Consulting Thomas Jensen, Integra Realty Resources The Massachusetts and Rhode Island Chapter of the Appraisal Institute will be holding a two-hour continuing education event at 2:30 PM on May 23rd within the Boston Bruins training facility at 80 Guest St. in Brighton. Panelist will include: Erin Harvey, senior leasing agent of NB Development; Keith Craig, project manager, New Balance Development; Ellen DeNooyer, senior project manager, MBTA; and James Parker, associate team counsel, Boston Celtics. Boston Landing is home of the Boston Bruins’ and soon to be Boston Celtics’ practice facilities. Following CE program, participants are invited for networking, cocktails and light refreshments, at Brighton Bowl, a new candlepin bowling alley, located in Flatbreads at 75 Guest St. The program will feature an overview of NB Development’s mixed-use Boston Landing complex with focus of the MBTA’s Public Private Partnership (P3) in constructing the new commuter rail station. It will also focus on the station’s impact on marketability and value as a transit-oriented development. Finally, the program will also discuss the new transit station as a catalyst for the overall neighborhood’s redevelopment. Public sector budgets are always under pressure and governmental agencies increasingly seek to fund development projects and infrastructure construction through public-private partnerships (“PPPs”). Public-private partnerships for infrastructure are more common in other regions of the world, but such partnerships are less common in the U.S. because there has often been public money set aside for these projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 I-90 Allston Interchange Project DEIR
    1 3 Alternatives Analysis Summary of Preferred Alternative Concept Development The Preferred Alternative Urban Interchange 3K was developed sequentially, beginning ENF 3 Chapter with the results of the Alternatives Analysis described in Attachment 9 of the DEIR FEIR Environmental Notification Form (ENF). The ENF described the then-preferred Urban (PUBLISHED OCTOBER 2014) Interchange 3J Series concept, which included three components: the reconstruction and realignment of the I-90 interchange, the reconstruction of a rail layover facility at Beacon Park Yard (BPY), and the construction of a new commuter rail station, designated as West Station. The features of the ENF 3J Series Preferred Alternative Group 1 & 2 | Suburban Style Interchange are illustrated in Figure 3-1 (provided at the end of the chapter). Secretary’s After the publication of the ENF, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation Dismissed from further study: Certificate MassDOT (MassDOT) continued refining and enhancing the Project concept. The Secretary’s – on the ENF Occupied a large amount of space modifies Task Force requests Certificate on the ENF provided guidance and suggestions to improve the 3J Series –Did not fit the urban context 3J Series Member MassDOT concept. Project stakeholder input from the Task Force, ongoing public participation, to address Alternative –Did not accommodate future land development to evaluate inter-agency collaboration, and coordination with Harvard University and abutters Secretary’s Concepts –Did not accommodate multi-modal connections a modified provided additional approaches and ideas. comments 3J Alternative Taking all of this input into consideration, MassDOT developed the current 3K Preferred in DEIR Alternative with three variations for the Throat Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 Meeting of the Ad Hoc Town Council
    Meeting of the Ad Hoc Town Council Committee on Transportation March 29, 2017 – Philip Pane Lower Conference Room Summary Report for May 9, 2017 The Ad Hoc Committee on Transportation was asked to engage the MBTA on a list of questions to improve the transit rider experience in Watertown. The meeting convened at 6:30 pm and the full list of guests from the MBTA, VHB, elected officials and the general public is available in a more detailed report from Committee Secretary Palomba (Attachment A). The published agenda and list of topics is included in Attachment B. In a general sense, the discussed items included, 1. The transit-related recommendations from the MassDOT Arsenal Corridor Study- (a) A proposed express bus route from Watertown Square to the Boston Landing commuter rail station in Allston; (b) More frequent 70/70A bus trips; (c) Splitting up of the 70/70A routes into 3 separate smaller routes. The relevant PowerPoint slides or interest that came from VHB’s last project working group meeting are attached (Attachment C). 2. The MBTA's Service Delivery Planning Policy- The speaker described the distinct elements of the MBTA’s new Service Delivery Plan Policy: the Service Plan changes and Quarterly Service changes. Watertown may be able to work with the MBTA to see some of the recommendations from the MassDOT/VHB Study in both of these types of service planning. The slides presented by the MBTA across all of the topics at the meeting are appended to the report in Attachment D. 3. The MBTA's next generation of fare-collection technology- The agenda item of off-bus fare collection was covered with this presentation from the MBTA.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded Comments on the City of Boston Placemaking Study Comments Submitted to the BRA on July 14, 2016
    Expanded Comments on the City of Boston Placemaking Study Comments submitted to the BRA on July 14, 2016 A Better City is pleased to comment on the Placemaking Study conducted by the City of Boston and its consultants, supported by MassDOT, as presented to the I-90 Allston Interchange Task Force on June 27, 2016 and further discussed with the Task Force on July 13, 2016. The Placemaking Study places due emphasis on the Interchange project as both a transportation initiative and a community development opportunity that over time will immeasurably improve the immediate Allston Neighborhood as well as create a vital new quarter for the City and region as a whole. We hope that the dialogue begun by the Placemaking Study will continue during the preparation of the Draft EIR and beyond as the designs for the area are further developed and implemented. The listed placemaking issues cover and summarize the range well. A Better City has developed and advanced an at-grade alternative in the “throat” area, which we believe is a key issue that will affect constructability, initial construction and on- going maintenance costs, and the nature of connections across the area, and we are pleased that your analysis has indicated that this is a key placemaking issue. Each of the other issues listed is also very important, several of which are critical to the success of West Station as a multi-modal hub that will support future development as well as enhance transit service for the adjacent neighborhoods and institutions. The listed goals are all laudable and necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Core Committee Core Inner WHAT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS DID the MPO IDENTIFY in ICC COMMUNITIES?
    Inner Core Committee • Milton • Melrose • Malden • Medford • Lynn • Chelsea Everett • Brookline • Cambridge • Belmont • Boston Arlington (ICC) Winthrop • Watertown • • Saugus • QuincyWaltham • SomervilleNeedham • Newton • Revere • Identifying Transportation Needs, Construction Projects, and Studies in Your Subregion Winter 2020 ON REG ST IO O N B M E N T O R I O T P A O IZ LMPOI N TA A N G P OR LANNING WHAT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS DID THE MPO IDENTIFY IN ICC COMMUNITIES? The Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) conducted an assessment of transportation needs in the Boston region to inform the MPO’s current Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Destination 2040, adopted in August 2019. MPO staff identified existing transportation conditions and made projections of future conditions and demand on the system. MPO staff also reached out to various subregional groups to discuss their transportation needs and opportunities to improve transportation in their communities. The resulting LRTP Needs Assessment serves as a tool for planning the region’s future transportation network, and for prioritizing the MPO’s limited funding for transportation projects and studies. The tables that follow highlight some of the transportation needs identified in the ICC subregion based on MPO analysis, and the lists below highlight needs identified from past visits to ICC communities for the Needs Assessment. For more information, please refer to the Destination 2040 Needs Assessment report and interactive applications on our website: bostonmpo.org/lrtp.
    [Show full text]