DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This PDF File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This PDF File 2021. Proc Ling Soc Amer 6(1). 173–187. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v6i1.4957. Leveling or reanalysis? An explanation of Middle High German paradigm merger Junyu Ruan* Abstract. Strong verbs in Middle High German (MHG) have two past indicative stems in the verb inflectional paradigm, which merged into one in Modern High German (NHG). This change is mostly assumed as paradigmatic leveling in previous studies. However, the NHG past indicative stems are inherited from different cells in the MHG paradigm across different inflectional classes, or even innovatively created by combining different parts of the MHG past indicative stems. This paper attempts to identify the base of leveling using a computational model called Minimal Generalization Learner, proposed in Albright (2002b). The results can account for the extraordinary patterns of merger found in German to some extent, but they are not perfect and even pose new problems. As a counter-proposal, I argue that the merger that appears to be paradigmatic leveling might be triggered by reanalysis of phonological features as morphological exponents. Keywords. Middle High German; analogy; historical linguistics; morphological change; inflectional paradigm; corpus linguistics 1. Analogical changes from Middle High German to Modern High German. The paradig- matic changes in the development from Middle High German (MHG) to Modern High German (NHG) are particularly interesting for morphological studies. In traditional MHG grammar, most verbs belong to either strong verbs or weak verbs, though there are also unproductive irregular groups with only few members. Segment alternation (conventionally termed Ablaut, Umlaut and Grammatischer Wechsel) and suffixation are the main ways to build tense-modal stems in strong classes, whereas in weak classes, tense-modal stems are built mostly by suffixation. In the devel- opment from MHG to NHG, unusual patterns of analogical change are attested. In MHG, inflectional paradigms of strong verbs are built out of six different stems at maximum: (a) the present singular stem, shared by indicative present singular forms and the imperative 2nd singular; (b) the infinitive stem, shared by the infinitive and all other present forms; (c) the past 1st/3rd stem, shared by the indicative past 1st singular and the 3rd singular; (d) the past plural stem, shared by indicative past plural forms; (e) the past subjunctive stem, shared by the indicative past 2nd singular and all subjunctive past forms; (f) the past participle stem, only used by the past par- ticiple.1 These stems can be distinguished not only by the stem vowel (Ablaut or Umlaut) but also by the stem-final consonant (Grammatischer Wechsel). In NHG, on the other hand, the stems of all past indicative forms merged into a single one. The directions of the merger of stem vowel as well as stem-final consonant, as shown below, are remarkably complex. 1.1. THE MERGER OF STEM VOWEL ALTERNATION FOR PAST INDICATIVE STEMS FROM MHG TO NHG. Most MHG Strong Classes have different stem vowels for the past 1st/3rd stem and the past plural stem, a pattern inherited from the distinction between Proto-Indo-European (PIE) o-grade * Authors: Junyu Ruan, The Ohio State University ([email protected]). 1 The difference in stem-vowel between the past subjunctive stem and other past stems results from Umlaut, which, according to Wiese (1996), should be considered lexical phonological rather than morphological in NHG. However, since the vowels of the personal endings, which had triggered the sound change in verb stems, were weakened into /ə/ in MHG and no longer synchronically identifiable, this paper considers all these stem forms to be morphological- ly conditioned and thus equally takes them as candidates for the base form in the whole paradigm. © 2021 Author(s). Published by the LSA with permission of the author(s) under a CC BY license. past singular stem and zero-grade past plural stem. Classes VI and VII have different origins in PIE, and correspondingly, the past indicative forms in these classes share the same stem from the very beginning. For Strong Classes that show vowel alternation between the past 1st/3rd and the past plural stems (i.e. Classes I - V), the distinction in stem vowel is lost in NHG, partially trig- gered by regular sound change in some Strong Classes and partially by morphological change in others. In cases where morphological changes occurred, we can see different directions of changes happened across different Strong Classes or even across different lexical items within the same Strong Class. MHG NHG Class gloss past.1.sg past.1.pl. past.part. past.1.sg. past.1.pl. past.part. VI /ɡruob/2 /ɡruobən/ /ɡəɡrabən/ /ɡruːb/ /ɡruːbən/ /ɡəɡraːbən/ “dug” VII3 /hielt/ /hieltən/ /ɡəhaltən/ /hiːlt/ /hiːlt-ən/ /ɡəhaltən/ “held” Table 1. Class VI & VII: preservation of MHG stems4 The past 1st/3rd stem and the past plural stem are originally the same in MHG for Strong Classes VI and VII. Therefore, though regular sound changes occurred in the stem vowel (i.e. the mon- ophthongization of MHG /uo/, /ie/ to NHG /uː/, /iː/, see Paul 1929:24), the morphological relationship between these two stems remains intact. MHG NHG Class gloss past.1.sg past.1.pl. past.part. past.1.sg. past.1.pl. past.part. IV /nam/ /naːmən/ /ɡənomən/ /naːm/ /naːmən/ /ɡənomən/ “took” Table 2. Class IV: Merger of the past 1st/3rd singular stem and the past plural stems caused by regular sound change Vowel lengthening started in some areas at a period as early as Old High German (OHG), and it spread through the whole High-German-speaking region by the time of NHG. It mostly occurred under three conditions: (1) in open syllables; (2) before /r/ + dental clusters; (3) in monosyllabic words ending with nasals or liquids (Mettke 1967:69-70; Paul 1929:21-22). MHG Strong Class IV verbs happen to be characterized by having nasals or liquids as stem-final consonants. As a result, the stem vowels in past 1st/3rd stems (e.g. /nam/) fulfill the third condition and are there- fore lengthened. This, then, is a merger triggered by sound change. However, analogical changes are attested in some exceptional cases. For example, the past indicative stem of /ʃerən/ “to shear” is /ʃor-/, whose stem vowel is the same as the stem vowel of past participle and believed to result from the preceding /ʃ/ sound (Mettke 1967:194). But /ʃerən/ has become weak and no longer belongs to Strong Class IV in NHG.5 2 Stem-final voiced stops are devoiced at word-final position in both MHG and NHG, i.e. /ɡruob/, /ɡruːb/ are pro- nounced as [ɡruop], [ɡruːp]. But the phonologically conditioned final devoicing rule is irrelevant to our study and not represented in the phonemic transcription. 3 Though there are six subclasses in Strong Class VII, the stem vowels in their past stems are the same. They are thus collapsed into one row in the table. For details about the subclasses see Mettke 1967:198-200, Paul 1929:112, Boor & Wisniewski 1984:127-128. 4 In MHG, the past subjunctive stem is phonologically predictable from the past plural stem through Umlaut (Paul 1929:107-108), and in NHG, it can be phonologically derived from the past stem. Therefore, the past subjunctive stem is mostly omitted in tables where inflectional paradigms of MHG or NHG are shown. 5 Strictly speaking, two individual processes of leveling are involved in the development of /ʃerən/ from MHG to NHG. The MHG past indicative stems are first leveled by the past participle in terms of stem vowel. Then its inflec- tional paradigm is completely rebuilt from its present stem based on derivational rules of NHG weak verbs, since it has become a weak verb in NHG. 174 MHG NHG Class gloss past.1.sg past.1.pl. past.part. past.1.sg. past.1.pl. past.part. Ia /steiɡ/ /stiɡən/ /ɡəstiɡən/ /ʃtiːɡ/ /ʃtiːɡən/ /ɡəʃtiːɡən/ “climbed” Ib /leːh/ /lihən/6 /ɡəlihən/ /liː/ /liːən/7 /ɡəliːən/ “lent” V /ɡab/ /ɡaːbən/ /ɡəɡebən/ /ɡaːb/ /ɡaːbən/ /ɡəɡeːbən/ “gave” Table 3. Classes I & V: Replacement of the past 1st/3rd singular stem by the past plural stem The past indicative stem in NHG Strong Class I is built based on the MHG past plural stem, whose stem vowel has undergone lengthening when in open syllables, cf. MHG /stiɡən/ “we climbed” > NHG /ʃtiːɡən/. By contrast, the expected descendants of MHG past 1st/3rd singular stems */staɪk/ and */leːh/ were replaced. Similarly, the lengthening of stem vowel in Strong Class V past 1st/3rd stem does not result from regular sound change but analogy, because the stem vowels in forms like [ɡab] do not stand in open syllables, nor are they followed by nasals or liquids, since MHG Strong Class V verbs are characteristic for not having nasals or liquids as stem-final consonants. On the other hand, lengthening that is triggered by other paradigm cells is attested not only among verbs but also among nouns, e.g. MHG /taɡəs/ (pl.) ~ /taɡ/ (sg.) “day” > NHG /taːɡə/ ~ /taːɡ/, where the stem vowel in the plural form stands in an open syllable and is thus lengthened. The lengthened vowel spreads to the singular form, where the condition for lengthening is not fulfilled.8 MHG NHG Class gloss past.1.sg past.1.pl. past.part. past.1.sg. past.1.pl. past.part. IIIa /band/ /bundən/ /ɡəbundən/ /band/ /bandən/ /ɡəbundən/ “bound” IIIb /ɡalt/ /ɡultən/ /ɡəɡoltən/ /ɡalt/ /ɡaltən/ /ɡəɡoltən/ “applied” Table 4. Class III: Replacement of the past plural stem by the past 1st/3rd singular stem In NHG, the /u/ in past plural stems has been replaced by /a/ in past singular forms, so that all past indicative forms share the same stem with /a/ across most lexical items in Strong Class III.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The English Language
    The English Language Version 5.0 Eala ðu lareow, tæce me sum ðing. [Aelfric, Grammar] Prof. Dr. Russell Block University of Applied Sciences - München Department 13 – General Studies Winter Semester 2008 © 2008 by Russell Block Um eine gute Note in der Klausur zu erzielen genügt es nicht, dieses Skript zu lesen. Sie müssen auch die “Show” sehen! Dieses Skript ist der Entwurf eines Buches: The English Language – A Guide for Inquisitive Students. Nur der Stoff, der in der Vorlesung behandelt wird, ist prüfungsrelevant. Unit 1: Language as a system ................................................8 1 Introduction ...................................... ...................8 2 A simple example of structure ..................... ......................8 Unit 2: The English sound system ...........................................10 3 Introduction..................................... ...................10 4 Standard dialects ................................ ....................10 5 The major differences between German and English . ......................10 5.1 The consonants ................................. ..............10 5.2 Overview of the English consonants . ..................10 5.3 Tense vs. lax .................................. ...............11 5.4 The final devoicing rule ....................... .................12 5.5 The “th”-sounds ................................ ..............12 5.6 The “sh”-sound .................................. ............. 12 5.7 The voiced sounds / Z/ and / dZ / ...................................12 5.8 The
    [Show full text]
  • 6 X 10.Long New.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-61803-8 - German: A Linguistic Introduction Sarah M. B. Fagan Index More information Index abbreviation 102, 258–260 analytic language 111n.45, 199 ablaut 57, 75, 80, 88, 97, 107, 113n.72, 186 anaphor 142 (Der) Abrogans 188 Anglo-Americanism 275–276 A.c.I. construction 143 antonymy 150–152 acronym 102–104 apex 12 address, forms of 252–255 approximant 13, 48n.6 in FWG 270 arytenoid cartilages 4–5, 50n.36, 211n.15 history of 252–253 aspect 153–155 adjective 90, 116, 119, 259 habitual 122, 155 attributive 71, 110n.33, 124 imperfective 153–154 and case 120–122 perfective 153 comparative form 71, 150–151, 190 progressive 155, 161–163, 216 inflection of 70–75 aspiration 11, 21, 23–24, 49n.16, 184–185, predicative 71–72, 110n.33, 111n.35, 241n.1 124–125 Aspiration (rule) 23–24 strong endings 72 assimilation 21, 26, 190, 248 superlative form 71, 111n.35 in colloquial German 246 weak endings 72–73 see also Nasal Assimilation, Velar Fricative see also compound Assimilation, voicing assimilation adjective phrase 63, 124–125, 193–194 Auslautverhartung¨ , see Final Fortition extended 125, 278n.10 Auslautsgesetze (laws of finals) 212n.33 adjunct 128 Austrian Standard German (ASG) 224–228 adjunction 135–136, 141–142 grammar 226–227 adverb 92, 116, 124–126, 141–142, 146n.15, legal language 279n.21 250–251; see also compound pronunciation 225–226 adverb phrase 124–126, 176–177 vocabulary 227–228 affix 55–56, 99, 106, 212n.29 auxiliary verb 85, 113n.78, 116, 129, 197, 199, derivational 90, 108n.3 251, 270 inflectional 56,
    [Show full text]
  • The Germanic Third Weak Class
    THE GERMANIC THIRD WEAK CLASS JAY H. JASANOFF Harvard University Germanic verbs of the 3rd weak class form presents characterized by an alternation between predesinential *ai (e.g. Go. 3sg. habai1» and *a (e.g. Ipl. habam). These verbs are usually compared with the 'e-verbs' of Italic and Balto­ Slavic, but no IE present built on the stative suffix *-e- will account phonologi­ cally for the form of the suffix in Germanic. Instead, it can be shown that the characteristic Germanic paradigm results from the 'activization' of an older middle paradigm in which a 3sg. in *-ai « IE *-oi; cf. Skt. duh~ 'milks') was further suffixed by the productive active ending *-Pi « IE *-ti). 1. The inflection of the third class of weak verbs (exemplified by the verb 'to have': Gothic haban, Old Norse hafa,! Old High German hab~, Old Saxon hebbian, Old English habban) presents one of the classic problems in the historical morphology of Germanic. Not only do the verbs of this class show peculiarities in all the older Germanic languages, but they differ remarkably in their conjugation from one language to another, so that it is not at all obvious how the Common Germanic paradigm should be reconstructed. Given this diversity of forms, we will do well to begin with a short review of the morphological facts themselves. The situation is simplest in Old High German. The entire conjugation of hab~n is athematic (to the extent that this term still has any meaning), and is based on the single stem hab~-: 1sg. hab~, 3sg. hab~t, 3pl.
    [Show full text]
  • And *- in Germanic
    Archaisms and innovations four interconnected studies on Germanic historical phonology and morphology Hansen, Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Publication date: 2014 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Hansen, B. S. S. (2014). Archaisms and innovations: four interconnected studies on Germanic historical phonology and morphology. Det Humanistiske Fakultet, Københavns Universitet. Download date: 27. sep.. 2021 FACULTY OF HUMANITIE S UNIVERSITY OF COPENH AGEN Ph .D. thesis Bjarne Simmelkjær Sandgaard Hansen Archaisms and innovations four interconnected studies on Germanic historical phonology and morphology i Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... V 1. Grammatical terms ....................................................................................................................................................... v 2. Linguanyms .................................................................................................................................................................. vi 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Archaisms and innovations ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2. Aim and purpose of the present thesis ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • From Very Early Germanic and Before Towards the “Old” Stages of the Germanic Languages
    F. Plank, Early Germanic 1 FROM VERY EARLY GERMANIC AND BEFORE TOWARDS THE “OLD” STAGES OF THE GERMANIC LANGUAGES 160,000+ years of human population history summarised, up to ca. 10,000 Before Now: Journey of Mankind: The Peopling of the World http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey/ The origin of Language and early languages – fascinating questions and challenges for geneticists, palaeontologists, archaeologists, physical and cultural anthropologists. Alas, this is not something historical linguists could do much/anything to shed light on. F. Plank, Early Germanic 2 No speech acts performed by early homines sapientes sapientes have come down to us to bear witness to their mental lexicons & grammars. From human fossils nothing can be inferred about the linguistic working of brains and little about the organs implicated in speech. Speech acts were given greater permanence through writing only much later: from around 3,200 BCE in Mesopotamia as well as in Egypt, from around 1,200 BCE in China, and from around 600 BCE in Mesoamerica. The technology for actually recording speech (and other) sounds was only invented in 1857. F. Plank, Early Germanic 3 What cannot be observed must be (rationally) hypothesised. The standard method in historical linguistics for rationally forming hypotheses about a past from which we have no direct evidence is the comparative method. Alas, the comparative method for the reconstruction of linguistic forms (lexical as well as grammatical) only reaches back some 8,000 years maximum, given the normal life expectancy and recognisability limits of forms and meanings. And it is questionable whether constructions can be rigorously reconstructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Proof Delivery Form
    Proof Delivery Form Please return this form with your proof CUP reference: A56657.1 Date of delivery: Journal and Article number: PHO446 Volume and Issue Number: 20(1) Number of pages (not including this page): 32 Phonology There follows a proof of the article you have written for publication in PHONOLOGY. Please check the proofs carefully, make any corrections necessary and answer queries on the proofs. Queries raised by the sub-editor are listed below; the text to which the queries refer is flagged in the margins of the proof. Please return the corrected proof together with the offprint order form as soon as possible (no later than 4 days after receipt) to: Colin Ewen Phonology Opleiding Engels Universiteit Leiden Postbus 9515 2300 RA Leiden The Netherlands FAX 071 5272149 To avoid delay from overseas, please send the proof by air mail or, preferably, by courier. ’ You are responsible for correcting your proofs! Errors not found may appear in the published journal. ’ The proof is sent to you for correction of typographical errors only. Revision of the substance of the text is not permitted. ’ Please answer carefully any queries raised by the sub-editor. Notes: If you have any queries, please contact the editor ([email protected]). Author queries: Typesetter queries: TQ1: Please provide the name of the publisher and place of publication for the book Final devoicing of º mentioned in ref. Iverson (1997) TQ2: Salmons (1993) in the text, but Salmons (1992) is cited twice in the reference. Please check. TQ3: Indo-European is repeating. Please check.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation
    PhD-FLSHASE-2015-19 Fakultät für Sprachwissenschaften und Fakultät für Geisteswissenschaften Literatur, Geisteswissenschaften, Kunst und Erziehungswissenschaften DISSERTATION verteidigt am 17/07/2015 in Luxemburg zur Erlangung des Titels DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITÉ DU LUXEMBOURG EN SCIENCES DU LANGAGE SOWIE DOKTOR PHIL. DER UNIVERSITÄT DUISBURG-ESSEN IN GERMANISTISCHER LINGUISTIK von Luc Belling geboren am 24. April 1985 in Luxemburg (Luxemburg) MEDIALE UND SPRACHLICHE MÖGLICHKEITSRÄUME IN DIGITALER SCHRIFTLICHKEIT EINE STUDIE ZU FACEBOOK-PINNWÄNDEN IN LUXEMBURG Prüfungskommission Dr. Peter Gilles - Betreuer der Arbeit Professor, Universität Luxemburg Dr. Evelyn Ziegler - Betreuerin der Arbeit Professorin, Universität Duisburg-Essen Dr. Constanze Weth - Vorsitzende A.-Professorin, Universität Luxemburg Dr. Ulrich Schmitz Professor, Universität Duisburg-Essen Dr. Stephan Schmid Professor, Universität Zürich Dr. Michael Beißwenger Professor, Universität Dortmund Vorwort Zunächst möchte ich mich an dieser Stelle bei all denjenigen bedanken, die mich während der Anfertigung dieser Dissertation unterstützt und motiviert haben. Ganz besonders danken möchte ich in erster Linie meinen Betreuern, Herrn Prof Dr. Peter Gilles und Frau Prof Dr. Evelyn Ziegler, die meine Arbeit und somit auch mich betreut haben. Sie über‐ nahmen die umfangreiche Betreuung und standen mir stets unterstützend zur Seite. Nicht nur, dass sie immer wieder durch Ratschläge, aber auch kritisches Hinterfragen wertvolle Hinweise gaben, auch ihre moralische Unterstützung und Motivation waren ein ausschlaggebender Faktor. Auch will ich mich bedanken bei Frau Prof. Dr. Weth, Herrn Prof. Dr. Imo und dem Dozenten‐ Team der 'Ascona Summerschool RCMCL 2012', die mir mit ihrer konstruktiven Kritik und den vielen gemeinsamen Diskussionen viele hilfreiche Anregungen und Ratschläge gaben. Ohne die Hilfe der vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen des Instituts für luxemburgische Sprache und Literaturen sowie der Doktoranden aus dem 'Aquarium' würde die Arbeit in dieser Form nicht existieren.
    [Show full text]
  • Englischer Sprachkontakt in Den Luxemburgischen Sprachinseln Im Mittleren Westen Der USA
    MASTERARBEIT Titel der Masterarbeit Englischer Sprachkontakt in den luxemburgischen Sprachinseln im Mittleren Westen der USA Verfasserin: Amira Ouardalitou B.A. Angestrebter Akademischer Grad Master of Arts (M.A.) Wien, 2012 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A066 899 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Angewandte Linguistik Betreuer: A.o. Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Rudolf de Cillia Danksagung Ich möchte allen Menschen danken, die mir in guten und schlechten Zeiten zur Seite standen. Meiner Familie und meinen Freunden möchte ich für jegliche Unterstützung danken. Die Arbeit widme ich Herrn Prof. Dr. Jan Wirrer, der mir den Anstoß zu diesem Forschungsthema gab und mir immer als Mentor zur Seite stand; meinen Probanden, die es mir überhaupt durch ihre engagierte Teilnahme ermöglicht haben, diese Arbeit zu schreiben, und meinem zukünftigen Ehemann Mike, der mir immer wieder Mut zusprach. 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis Abbildungsverzeichnis 6 Tabellenverzeichnis 7 1. Einleitung 8 1.1 Untersuchungsgegenstand 10 1.2 Untersuchungsgebiet 11 1.3 Vorgehensweise und Untersuchungshypothesen 12 1.4 Forschungsstand 14 2. Geschichtlicher Hintergrund 16 2.1 Der Weg zum Großherzogtum Luxemburg 16 2.1.1 Kurzer Überblick der Geschichte Luxemburgs 16 2.1.2 Entwicklung der Sprachsituation 20 2.1.2.1 Standardisierung des Luxemburgischen 25 2.1.2.2 Werdegang der Orthographie des Luxemburgischen 28 2.1.3 Heutiger Status des Luxemburgischen 29 2.2 Sprachsituation innerhalb Luxemburgs 31 2.3 Luxemburgische Auswanderung in die USA 34 2.3.1 Luxemburgische Sprache 36 2.3.2 Luxemburgische Sprachinseln 37 2.4 Identität 40 3. Theoretischer Hintergrund der Sprachkontaktforschung 42 3.1 Sprachkontakt 42 3.1.1 Definition 42 3.1.2 Wirkungen von Diglossie 42 3.2 Sprachkontaktforschung 44 3.3 Sprachinselforschung 44 3.4 Sprachkontaktphänomene 45 3.4.1 Code-Switching 46 3.4.2 Entlehnungen vs.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. OE > Mode, Changes.Quer Copy
    F. Plank, Ways of Change 1 WAYS OF CHANGE //under construction// F. Plank, Ways of Change 2 “Languages constantly change” Locke, John. 1689. An essay concerning human understanding. London: Basset, Ch. 22: “Hence also we may see the reason, why languages constantly change, take up new and lay by old terms. Because change of customs and opinions bringing with it new combinations of ideas, which it is necessary frequently to think on and talk about, new names, to avoid long descriptions, are annexed to them; and so they become new species of complex modes. What a number of different ideas are by this means wrapped up in one short sound, and how much of our time and breath is thereby saved, any one will see, who will but take the pains to enumerate all the ideas that either REPRIEVE or APPEAL stand for; and instead of either of those names, use a periphrasis, to make any one understand their meaning.” “Language constantly changes” Stone, Alison. 2007. An introduction to feminist philosophy. Cambridge: Polity Press, p115: “Language constantly changes. Lacan infers that any encounyer with language is frustrating. Any words and phrases that one encounters promise to be meaningful, yet have no definite meaning. [...] As such, when any child enters language, it becomes gripped by a new force: desire, specifically the desire for meaning.” ... F. Plank, Ways of Change 3 But do they? Why should they? Given a speech community which is (i) none too large and (ii) reasonably homogeneous, (iii) with its members socially well interconnected, and (iv) which inhabits a circumscribed, coherent, none-too-big territory, and (v) largely keeps to itself, we might expect that its members – and especially its new members as they are acquiring the linguistic know-how that defines and delimits this speech community – have very similar linguistic experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Consonant and Vowel Gradation in the Proto-Germanic N-Stems Guus, Kroonen
    Consonant and vowel gradation in the Proto-Germanic n-stems Guus, Kroonen Citation Guus, K. (2009, April 7). Consonant and vowel gradation in the Proto-Germanic n-stems. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14513 Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the License: Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14513 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Consonant and vowel gradation in the Proto-Germanic n-stems PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van Doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden, op gezag van Rector Magnificus prof. mr. P.F. van der Heijden, volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties te verdedigen op dinsdag 7 april 2009 klokke 16:15 uur door GUUS JAN KROONEN geboren te Alkmaar in 1979 Promotor: Prof. dr. A.M Lubotsky Commissie: Prof. dr. F.H.H. Kortlandt Prof. dr. R. Lühr (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena) Dr. H. Perridon (Universiteit van Amsterdam) Prof. dr. A. Quak Þá er þeir Borssynir gengu með sævar strǫndu, fundu þeir tré tvau ok tóku upp tréin ok skǫpuðu af menn: gaf hinn fyrsti ǫnd ok líf, annarr vit ok hræring, þriði ásjónu ok málit ok heyrn ok sjón. Hár, Gylfaginning The Leiden theory explains religion as a disease of language and predicts the existence of God and other such parasitic mental constructs as artefacts of language. George van Driem, 2003 Table of contents Preface................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Conditional Entropy in Determining the Base for Leveling in Old High German Inflectional Paradigm JUNYU RUAN the Ohio State University [email protected]
    The role of conditional entropy in determining the base for leveling in Old High German inflectional paradigm JUNYU RUAN The Ohio State University [email protected] ABSTRACT In the development from Old High German (OHG) to Modern High German (NHG), analogical changes occurred in the inflectional paradigm, in that the older past singular stem and past plural stem are leveled to a single past stem in the later language. However, different bases for leveling are attested in different inflectional classes. This paper takes an information-theoretic approach to the explanation of the multi-directional leveling found in the history of German. We assume that speakers use the most informative cell in the paradigm as the base for deriving other forms in the paradigm, and when analogical changes happen in the language, other forms in the paradigm might be leveled to the base but the base form would not be affected by leveling. Under this assumption, we studied the inflectional paradigms of verbs collected from an OHG corpus, and measured informativeness of a cell by its conditional entropy in predicting other cells in the paradigm. Results show that, in classes where the conditional entropy analysis makes strong predictions, the predictions are consistent with the attested historical changes, though other factors could also play a role in determining the base in classes where no strong predictions can be made based on informativeness. KEYWORDS leveling, German, paradigm, predictiveness, analogy 79 RÉSUMÉ Des changements d’ordre flexionnel ont eu lieu dans l’évolution de le vieux haut allemand (VHA) vers le haut allemand moderne (HAM).
    [Show full text]
  • Sprachvergleich
    Sprachvergleich 30. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft 27.02. – 29.02.2008 in Bamberg Organisationskomitee der DGfS Jahrestagung 2008 Thomas Becker, Helmut Glück, Martin Haase, Gabriele Knappe, Manfred Krug, Jan-Henning Schulze Technik, Infrastruktur: Thomas Becker Tagungsbüro: Helga Münch, Philipp Burdy Webauftritt, Hilfskräfte: Jan-Henning Schulze Finanzen: Helmut Glück Sponsoren: Manfred Krug Catering, Warming-up, Geselliger Abend: Martin Haase, Monika Fiedler Tagungsbroschüre: Gabriele Knappe, Manfred Krug, Liesbeth Dietel Umschlag- und Postergestaltung: Holger Klatte, Pero Köhler Verlagsausstellung: Thomas Becker, Gabriele Knappe Raumverteilung: Thomas Becker, Sarah Bauch Sekretariat: Liesbeth Dietel, Monika Fiedler, Barbara Heger, Helga Münch Programmausschuss: Stefan Müller, Regine Eckardt, Martin Haase, Barbara Stiebels Weitere Helferinnen und Helfer: Wieland Eins, Stefanie Förtsch, Klaus Guenther, Isabel Haller, Dorothea Hüttinger, Ole Schützler, Valentin Werner Danksagung Der Dank der Organisatoren gilt allen Personen und Institutionen, die die Tagung unterstützt haben: Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg Universitätsbund Bamberg e.V. Präsident der Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (DGfS) Vorstand und Programmausschuss der DGfS Stadt Bamberg HypoVereinsbank Walter de Gruyter Stiftung Akademie Verlag Langenscheidt KG John Benjamins Publishing Company LINCOM Europa Bibliographisches Institut & Missing Link Versandbuchhandlung F. A. Brockhaus AG Narr Francke
    [Show full text]