DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Development Plan Annual Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Development Plan Annual Update TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ANNUAL UPDATE Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 RELATIONSHIP OF MDT10AHEAD TO OTHER LOCALLY ADOPTED TRANSPORTATION PLANS ............... 1-2 1.1.1 Long Range Transportation Plan to the Year 2040 ...................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.2 Transit Development Plan (TDP) - MDT10Ahead ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.1.3 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) ................................................................................................ 1-4 1.1.4 Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Five Year Work Program ..................................................... 1-4 1.1.5 State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) .................................................................................... 1-5 1.1.6 Adopted Budget and Multi Year Capital Plan ............................................................................................... 1-5 2.0 SYSTEM OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 METROBUS ......................................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.1 Local Service .............................................................................................................................................. 2-3 2.1.2 Circulator Service ........................................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.1.3 Limited-Stop Service ................................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.1.4 Express Bus Service ................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.1.5 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ............................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2 METRORAIL ......................................................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.3 METROMOVER .................................................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4 SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES ........................................................................................................ 2-10 2.5 SERVICES PROVIDED BY PRIVATE CONTRACTORS .................................................................................... 2-10 2.6 MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT PASSENGER FARE STRUCTURE ............................................................................. 2-11 2.6.1 Farebox Recovery Ratio ............................................................................................................................ 2-12 2.7 MIAMI-DADE TRANSIT’S SPECIAL PROGRAMS ............................................................................................. 2-13 2.7.1 Transportation Disadvantaged Program .................................................................................................... 2-13 2.7.2 Section 5310 Program............................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.7.3 Corporate Discount Program ..................................................................................................................... 2-14 2.7.4 College/Vocation School Discount Program .............................................................................................. 2-14 2.7.5 K-12 Discount Program ............................................................................................................................. 2-14 Transit Development Plan FY 2017 - 2026 | August 2016 i 2.7.6 EASY Card Sales Outlets .......................................................................................................................... 2-14 2.7.7 Golden Passport Office ............................................................................................................................. 2-14 2.8 CUSTOMER INFORMATION/CONVENIENCE ................................................................................................... 2-15 2.8.1 Smartphone Mobile Application (iPhone and Android) .............................................................................. 2-15 2.8.2 Electronic Transit Rider Alert System / Train Tracker / Mover Tracker ...................................................... 2-15 2.9 MAINTENANCE AND STORAGE FACILITIES .................................................................................................. 2-16 2.10 PARK-AND-RIDE FACILITIES ........................................................................................................................... 2-16 2.11 PEDESTRIAN OVERPASSES ............................................................................................................................ 2-16 2.12 MUNICIPAL TRANSIT SERVICES ..................................................................................................................... 2-19 2.13 REGIONAL TRANSIT SERVICE CONNECTIONS ............................................................................................. 2-23 2.13.1 Broward County Transit (BCT) .................................................................................................................. 2-23 2.13.2 South Florida Regional Transportation Authority (SFRTA) ........................................................................ 2-24 2.14 NATIONAL CONNECTIONS .............................................................................................................................. 2-28 2.14.1 Greyhound Intercity Passenger Bus Service ............................................................................................. 2-28 2.14.2 Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail Service ................................................................................................... 2-28 3.0 CIVIC ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 CIVIC ENGAGEMENT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 STAKEHOLDER COORDINATION ...................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 CareerSource South Florida (Regional Workforce Board) ........................................................................... 3-2 3.2.2 Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC) .................................................................................. 3-2 3.2.3 Transportation Planning Technical Advisory Committee (TPTAC) ............................................................... 3-2 3.2.4 Electronic Communication ........................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 CIVIC ENGAGEMENT OUTCOMES ..................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.4 SURVEY RESULTS .............................................................................................................................................. 3-4 4.0 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 GOAL 1 – IMPROVE CONVENIENCE, RELIABILITY, AND CUSTOMER SERVICE OF TRANSIT SERVICES .. 4-2 4.1.1 Transit Signal Priority (TSP) ........................................................................................................................ 4-3 4.1.2 Pedestrian Overpass at University Metrorail Station .................................................................................... 4-6 4.1.3 CAD/AVL System Replacement .................................................................................................................. 4-7 Transit Development Plan FY 2017 - 2026 | August 2016 ii 4.1.4 Real-Time Analytics and Reporting for Operational Efficiencies .................................................................. 4-8 4.1.5 Real-Time Signs.......................................................................................................................................... 4-8 4.2 GOAL 2 – IMPROVE OPERATIONAL SAFETY AND SECURITY ....................................................................... 4-9 4.2.1 Systemwide Safety and Security Upgrades ................................................................................................. 4-9 4.3 GOAL 3 – IMPROVE COORDINATION AND OUTREACH ................................................................................ 4-10 4.3.1 Collaboration of Regional Transportation Initiatives ................................................................................... 4-11 4.4 GOAL 4 – ENHANCE THE INTEGRATION OF TRANSIT SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE ECONOMY AND PRESERVE THE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • English, French, and Spanish Colonies: a Comparison
    COLONIZATION AND SETTLEMENT (1585–1763) English, French, and Spanish Colonies: A Comparison THE HISTORY OF COLONIAL NORTH AMERICA centers other hand, enjoyed far more freedom and were able primarily around the struggle of England, France, and to govern themselves as long as they followed English Spain to gain control of the continent. Settlers law and were loyal to the king. In addition, unlike crossed the Atlantic for different reasons, and their France and Spain, England encouraged immigration governments took different approaches to their colo- from other nations, thus boosting its colonial popula- nizing efforts. These differences created both advan- tion. By 1763 the English had established dominance tages and disadvantages that profoundly affected the in North America, having defeated France and Spain New World’s fate. France and Spain, for instance, in the French and Indian War. However, those were governed by autocratic sovereigns whose rule regions that had been colonized by the French or was absolute; their colonists went to America as ser- Spanish would retain national characteristics that vants of the Crown. The English colonists, on the linger to this day. English Colonies French Colonies Spanish Colonies Settlements/Geography Most colonies established by royal char- First colonies were trading posts in Crown-sponsored conquests gained rich- ter. Earliest settlements were in Virginia Newfoundland; others followed in wake es for Spain and expanded its empire. and Massachusetts but soon spread all of exploration of the St. Lawrence valley, Most of the southern and southwestern along the Atlantic coast, from Maine to parts of Canada, and the Mississippi regions claimed, as well as sections of Georgia, and into the continent’s interior River.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Corridor Chase, Maryland January 4, 1987
    PB88-916301 NATIONAL TRANSPORT SAFETY BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 20594 RAILROAD ACCIDENT REPORT REAR-END COLLISION OF AMTRAK PASSENGER TRAIN 94, THE COLONIAL AND CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION FREIGHT TRAIN ENS-121, ON THE NORTHEAST CORRIDOR CHASE, MARYLAND JANUARY 4, 1987 NTSB/RAR-88/01 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB/RAR-88/01 . PB88-916301 Title and Subtitle Railroad Accident Report^ 5-Report Date Rear-end Collision of'*Amtrak Passenger Train 949 the January 25, 1988 Colonial and Consolidated Rail Corporation Freight -Performing Organization Train ENS-121, on the Northeast Corridor, Code Chase, Maryland, January 4, 1987 -Performing Organization 7. "Author(s) ~~ Report No. Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Unit No. National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation .Contract or Grant No. Washington, D.C. 20594 k3-Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Iroad Accident Report lanuary 4, 1987 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D. C. 20594 1*+.Sponsoring Agency Code 15-Supplementary Notes 16 Abstract About 1:16 p.m., eastern standard time, on January 4, 1987, northbound Conrail train ENS -121 departed Bay View yard at Baltimore, Mary1 and, on track 1. The train consisted of three diesel-electric freight locomotive units, all under power and manned by an engineer and a brakeman. Almost simultaneously, northbound Amtrak train 94 departed Pennsylvania Station in Baltimore. Train 94 consisted of two electric locomotive units, nine coaches, and three food service cars. In addition to an engineer, conductor, and three assistant conductors, there were seven Amtrak service employees and about 660 passengers on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from Ghanaian Railways∗
    Colonial Investments and Long-Term Development in Africa: Evidence from Ghanaian Railways∗ Remi JEDWABa Alexander MORADIb a Department of Economics, George Washington University, and STICERD, London School of Economics b Department of Economics, University of Sussex This Version: October 14th, 2012 Abstract: What is the impact of colonial public investments on long-term development? We investigate this issue by looking at the impact of railway construction on economic develop- ment in Ghana. Two railway lines were built by the British to link the coast to mining areas and the hinterland city of Kumasi. Using panel data at a fine spatial level over one century (11x11 km grid cells in 1891-2000), we find a strong effect of rail connectivity on the pro- duction of cocoa, the country’s main export commodity, and development, which we proxy by population and urban growth. First, we exploit various strategies to ensure our effects are causal: we show that pre-railway transport costs were prohibitively high, we provide ev- idence that line placement was exogenous, we find no effect for a set of placebo lines, and results are robust to instrumentation and nearest neighbor matching. Second, transportation infrastructure investments had large welfare effects for Ghanaians during the colonial period. Colonization meant both extraction and development in this context. Third, railway con- struction had a persistent impact: railway cells are more developed today despite a complete displacement of rail by other means of transport. We investigate the various channels of path dependence, including demographic growth, industrialization or infrastructure investments. Keywords: Colonialism; Africa; Transportation Infrastructure; Trade JEL classification: F54; O55; O18; R4; F1 ∗Remi Jedwab, George Washington University and STICERD, London School of Economics (e-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • May 22, 2017 Volume 37
    MAY 22, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 5 A Club in Transition 3 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 5 ■■■■■ MAY 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….4 Treasurer………………....Will Baker A Club in Transition….…..13 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Contests ................ ………..4 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Clinic……………..….…….7 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Editor’s Notes. ….…....… .13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘17) Form 19 Orders .... ………..4 Members .............. ….…....14 Memories ............. .………..5 Potpourri .............. ..……….7 ON THE COVER: The first 25% of our building was Running Extra .....
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016
    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-17/02 National PB2018-100263 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-17/02 PB2018-100263 Notation 57150 Adopted November 14, 2017 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment, Chester, Pennsylvania, April 3, 2016. NTSB/RAR-17/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: On April 3, 2016, about 7:50 a.m. eastern daylight time, southbound Amtrak train 89 (train 89) struck a backhoe with a worker inside at milepost 15.7 near Chester, Pennsylvania. The train was authorized to operate on main track 3 (track 3) at the maximum authorized speed of 110 mph. Beginning on the morning of April 1, Amtrak had scheduled track-bed restoration―ballast vacuuming—at milepost 15.7 on track 2 on the Philadelphia to Washington Line. Track 2 had to be taken out of service between control points Baldwin (milepost 11.7) and Hook (milepost 16.8) for the 55 hour duration of the project. As train 89 approached milepost 15.7, the locomotive engineer saw equipment and workers on and near track 3 and initiated an emergency brake application. The train speed was 106 mph before the emergency brake application and 99 mph when it struck the backhoe. Two roadway workers were killed, and 39 other people were injured. Amtrak estimated property damages to be $2.5 million.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees May 1998 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes GAO/RCED-98-151 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-279203 May 14, 1998 The Honorable Richard C. Shelby Chairman The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Frank R. Wolf Chairman The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Since it began operations in 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) has never been profitable and has received about $21 billion in federal subsidies for operating and capital expenses. In December 1994, at the direction of the administration, Amtrak established the goal of eliminating its need for federal operating subsidies by 2002. However, despite efforts to control expenses and improve efficiency, Amtrak has only reduced its annual net loss from $834 million in fiscal year 1994 to $762 million in fiscal year 1997, and it projects that its net loss will grow to $845 million this fiscal year.1 Amtrak remains heavily dependent on substantial federal operating and capital subsidies. Given Amtrak’s continued dependence on federal operating subsidies, the Conference Report to the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1998 directed us to examine the financial (1) performance of Amtrak’s current routes, (2) implications for Amtrak of multiyear capital requirements and declining federal operating subsidies, and (3) effect on Amtrak of reforms contained in the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Trail N W E S
    Welcome to Boston’s Freedom Trail N W E S Each number on the map is associated with a stop along the Freedom Trail. Read the summary with each number for a brief history of the landmark. 15 Bunker Hill Charlestown Cambridge 16 Musuem of Science Leonard P Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge Boston Harbor Charlestown Bridge Hatch Shell 14 TD Banknorth Garden/North Station 13 North End 12 Government Center Beacon Hill City Hall Cheers 2 4 5 11 3 6 Frog Pond 7 10 Rowes Wharf 9 1 Fanueil Hall 8 New England Downtown Crossing Aquarium 1. BOSTON COMMON - bound by Tremont, Beacon, Charles and Boylston Streets Initially used for grazing cattle, today the Common is a public park used for recreation, relaxing and public events. 2. STATE HOUSE - Corner of Beacon and Park Streets Adjacent to Boston Common, the Massachusetts State House is the seat of state government. Built between 1795 and 1798, the dome was originally constructed of wood shingles, and later replaced with a copper coating. Today, the dome gleams in the sun, thanks to a covering of 23-karat gold leaf. 3. PARK STREET CHURCH - One Park Street, Boston MA 02108 church has been active in many social issues of the day, including anti-slavery and, more recently, gay marriage. 4. GRANARY BURIAL GROUND - Park Street, next to Park Street Church Paul Revere, John Hancock, Samuel Adams, and the victims of the Boston Massacre. 5. KINGS CHAPEL - 58 Tremont St., Boston MA, corner of Tremont and School Streets ground is the oldest in Boston, and includes the tomb of John Winthrop, the first governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
    [Show full text]
  • Patriotism and Honor: Veterans of Dutchess County, New York
    Patriotism and Honor: Veterans of Dutchess County, New York Dutchess County Historical Society 2018 Yearbook • Volume 97 Candace J. Lewis, Editor Dutchess County Historical Society The Society is a not-for-profit educational organization that collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Dutchess County, New York, from the period of the arrival of the first Native Americans until the present day. Publications Committee: Candace J. Lewis, Ph.D., Editor David Dengel, Dennis Dengel, John Desmond, Roger Donway, Eileen Hayden, Julia Hotton, Bill Jeffway, Melodye Moore, and William P. Tatum III Ph.D. Designer: Marla Neville, Main Printing, Poughkeepsie, New York mymainprinter.com Printer: Advertisers Printing, Saint Louis, Missouri Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook 2018 Volume 97 • Published annually since 1915 Copyright © by Dutchess County Historical Society ISSN: 0739-8565 ISBN: 978-0-944733-13-4 Front Cover: Top: Young men of Dutchess County recently transformed into soldiers. On the steps of the Armory, Poughkeepsie, New York. 1917. Detail. Bottom: Men, women, and children walk along the railroad tracks in Poughkeepsie at lower Main Street, seeing off a contingent of soldiers as they entrain for war. 1918. Back Cover: Left: Nurses from around the country march in the parade of April 6, 1918. Detail. Middle: A “patriotic pageant,l” performed by children. April 1918. Right: Unidentified individual as he gets ready to “entrain” in the separate recruitment of African Americans. 1918, Detail. All Photographs by Reuben P. Van Vlack. Collection of the Dutchess County Historical Society. The Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook does not assume responsibility for statements of fact or opinion made by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Qualifying Handbook  Municipal Candidates City of Miami  2007  Office of the City Clerk 3500 Pan American Dr
    Qualifying Handbook Municipal Candidates City of Miami 2007 Office of the City Clerk 3500 Pan American Dr. Miami, Florida 33133 305-250-5360 [email protected] Table of Contents Letter to Prospective Candidates …………………………… 3 Qualifying Requirements, Fees and Forms …………............ 10 Candidate Withdrawal Policy ………………………………. 32 City of Miami Precincts ………………………………........... 32 Municipal Clerks …………………………………………….. 43 2007 Election Calendar ……………………………………… 48 Chapter 106 – Penalties ………………………………........... 53 Miami-Dade County Elections Items for Sale ………........... 55 Pollwatcher Information ……………………………………. 57 Political Advertising …………………………………………. 63 Absentee Ballot Request Forms ……………………….......... 70 Campaign Finance Report Forms …………………………. 80 Campaign Skills Seminar …………………………………… 97 City of Miami Office of the City Clerk 3500 Pan American Drive Miami, FL 33133 (305) 250-5360 http://www.ci.miami.fl.us/City_Clerk/ Letter to Prospective Candidates -3- DATE: May 3 1,2007 TO: ALL PROSPECTIVE CANDIDATES RE: ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 6, 2007 FOR THE POSITIONS OF COMMISSIONER-DISTICT 1, COMMISSIONER-DISTRICT 2 AND COMMISSIONER-DISTRICT 4. FROM: PRISCILLA A. THOMPSON, CMC, CITY CLERK ...................................................... Enclosed please find updated information in reference to the 2007 City of Miami General Municipal Election. Please note the change of date for the Runoff Election is now November 20, 2007, and the Termination Report for candidates elected or eliminated during the runoff election is now due February
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Document
    Amtra ~ A Newsletter für Amtrak Emplüyees VOlUME 2-ISSUE 4 FEBRUARY 19, 1973 It probably wasn't true, as one Texan said, that the most exeiting thing to hit the Lone Star State in deeades was the inaugural run of Amtrak's Inter Ameriean on January 27th. But the train eer­ tainly did draw erowds all along its route. This group jammed the station plat­ form so tightly at one stop, photographers were forees to climb the train order signal mast to get their pie tu res. (Additional pietures on Pages 4 and 5.) texans welcome amtrak with cheers and crowds A Texas sun glowing with the promise of a benign Commerce officers were on hand to welcome the train January day was rising over Fort Worth as the 164 and its passengers with carefully-worded speeches and passengers began boarding the gleaming, immaculate band music. Five minute stops stretched to 15 minutes train. They were embarki ng on a 474-mile train ride but no o ne seemed to worry. It was an event to be and they were in a holiday mood. For 11 hours, they marked w ith well-rounded phrases and Sousa's best would be rolling south ac ross the vast, mesquite-studded even if it took a few extra minutes. Several times, long, plains of the Lone Star State. For some of the travelers piercing blasts from the engineer were required to get it was going to be one long party. For others, it was the passengers back aboard. One thing nobody wanted going to be a restful, pleasant journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Public Transportation Commission Minutes of December 4, 2008
    Connecticut Public Transportation Commission Minutes of December 4, 2008 Fourth Floor Conference Room Union Station, New Haven Attendance: Members: Tom Cheeseman, Mort Katz, Russ St. John, Terry Hall, Rich Sunderhauf, Rick Schreiner, Yvonne Loteczka, Chris Adams, Alan Sylvestre, Bill Kelaher, Richard Carpenter. Ex-officio members: Susan Simmat (OPM), Connie Mendolia (DEP), Fred Riese (DEP). ConnDOT staff: Dennis King. Guests: Leo Petry. Chairman Cheeseman opened the meeting at 1:32 PM. Tom announced that today’s scheduled speaker, Michael Krauss, had phoned Tom earlier this afternoon to say that he would be unable to make today’s meeting. Following this, the minutes of the meeting of November 6 were approved as written. Tom mentioned that all Jobs Access and Reverse Commute transportation providers have been asked to submit 5% recission package cuts. For Tom’s system, Middletown Area Transit, this may force him to cut the return trip on the Night Owl run, which will mean that he can get workers to their jobs but not home. The Night Owl service provides 31,000 – 33,000 trips per year. Tom’s other Jobs Access service, the M Link, which connects Middletown and Meriden, provides 36,000 trips per year. His Jobs Access ridership has been growing at 3% per month. Also, the Department of Social Services may not have their Jobs Access contracts ready by December 31, which means providers will receive no money until after the new year begins. Some providers will need to borrow money to cover this interval. Comments from the Public None. Reports from Operating Entities Rick Schreiner said the impacts to Housatonic Area Regional Transit’s Jobs Access program from the 5% recission are not clear yet.
    [Show full text]