Green Belt Update of the South Ayrshire Proposed Local Development Plan
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Green belt update method
3. History and original justification for green belt designation
4. Evaluation of existing green belt against Scottish Planning Policy and the Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan
5. Purpose of the South Ayrshire Proposed Local Development Plan green belt update
6. Establishment of green belt evaluation framework
7. Green belt evaluation
8. Conclusion
South Ayrshire Council Greenbelt Update
1 Introduction
1.1 This report represents the findings of South Ayrshire Council’s green belt update which was undertaken to: I. ensure that South Ayrshire’s green belt was consistent with the purposes and objectives of green belts as set out in Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) and the Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan (AJSP); and II. inform the content of the South Ayrshire Proposed Local Development Plan (SAPLDP).
2. Green Belt Update method
2.1 This section of the report describes the method and approach used to conduct an update of South Ayrshire’s green belt. It is considered that the methodology outlined below provides a sound basis for updating the green belt.
2.2 The need for consistency of approach is crucial, and the methodology requires to be robust and consistent with the purposes of a green belt as set out in SPP and the adopted AJSP.
2.3 While there are no common methodologies set out in SPP or the AJSP, the approach adopted is one to establish a framework which can be applied consistently using, as far as possible, data already held. While different methodologies can be equally valid and rigorous, the methodology adopted involves five areas of work being undertaken to ensure a consistent and robust green belt update. These areas of work are:
• History and original justification for green belt designation • Evaluation of existing South Ayrshire green belt against SPP & AJSP • Definition of green belt purpose • Establishment of green belt assessment framework • Assessment of existing green belt and update
3. History and original justification for green belt designation
3.1 There has been a statutory green belt around Ayr, Prestwick and Troon since 1965. Initially, the green belt was designated around Prestwick Airport for the following purposes:
a) to preserve the amenity of the airport b) for public safety; and c) to ensure new housing areas would not be subject to excessive aircraft noise. 3.2 The green belt was identified in the adopted (1985) North Kyle Local Plan, the adopted 1990 East Kyle Local Plan, the adopted 1989 Ayr/Prestwick Local Plan and the adopted 2007 South Ayrshire Local Plan.
3.3 Over time there have been periodic changes to the boundary of the green belt. The 1990 Strathclyde Structure Plan Update concluded that the appropriateness of the green belt in Ayrshire had altered. The changes in circumstance comprised of the following;
a) the apparent closure of the second runway at Glasgow Prestwick Airport, and the then perceived diminished role of the airport. b) More limited areas of land around Ayr are defined as prime quality agricultural land, which should be protected c) Areas around the green belt, including the southern fringes of Ayr had been subject to development pressure, and such areas are environmentally sensitive.
3.4 The 1990 structure plan update, concluded that the countryside adjoining the green belt was assuming wider green belt functions and, accordingly redefined the purposes for the greenbelt around Ayr, Prestwick and Troon as; a) maintaining the identity of Prestwick and Troon and preventing their coalescence, b) maintaining the landscape setting of the towns and villages of North Kyle and Carrick District c) providing recreational opportunities d) protecting good quality agricultural land.
3.5 The context for doing this was provided by the now superseded Circular 24/1985 ‘Development in the countryside and Green Belts”, which stated that
“Structure Plan should describe the strategic context and general location of green belts and set out the development control policies which apply to them. Local Plans should define the precise boundaries of any green belt within the area covered by the plan” 3.6 Within the context of Circular 24/85, the former Kyle and Carrick District Council prepared and published a review of the green belt, entitled ‘Prestwick Airport Greenbelt 1990 Review’. The review sought to identify the precise boundaries of the green belt to meet with the purposes identified in para.2.4 above. However, this review was subsequently not taken forward into statutory defined boundaries, which Circular 24/5 required to be identified through local plans. The Consultative Draft South Ayrshire Local Plan was the first local plan to define the boundaries of the greenbelt to meet altered objectives and functions, wider than those of the, then, current Prestwick Airport Greenbelt.
3.7 The policies and principles relating to the green belt around Ayr, Prestwick and Troon were further updated in the Strathclyde Structure Plan 1995. In setting out objectives for the green belt, further objectives were added, including controlling the growth of built up areas, assisting with the process of urban renewal and preserving landscape character.
3.8 The Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan was approved by the Scottish Ministers in January 2000, and superseded the Strathclyde Structure Plan 1995, as the structure plan for South Ayrshire.
3.9 The Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan further recognised that the greenbelt around Ayr, Prestwick and Troon had shifted from protective measures for the airport to more recognisable protection for landscape amenity and the prevention of neighbouring towns from merging. The 2000 structure plan defined the purposes of the green belt around Ayr, Prestwick and Troon as being;
a) control the growth of the built up areas and complement the process of urban renewal; b) prevent neighbouring towns from merging; c) preserve the character of towns including their landscape setting; d) protect agricultural land from development and create stability for its productive use; e) preserve landscape character and provide the necessary stability for its enhancement and f) provide for the enjoyment of the countryside.
3.10 Further, the 2000 Structure Plan accepted there was pressure on the countryside around the Ayr, Prestwick and Troon area of a different magnitude to elsewhere in Ayrshire, and so considered that greenbelt protection was warranted. The Strategic Development Guidelines were particularly onerous and stated a presumption against development, unless specific criteria were met, while the Strategic Development Guidelines for the other countryside areas - Rural Protection Area and Rural Diversification Area - were less onerous and allowed for a range of development types.
3.11 The extent of the green belt was indicated in the 2000 Structure Plan Key Diagram by arrows that spread east and south wards from Ayr, east and north from Prestwick and east from Troon.
3.12 The Consultative Draft South Ayrshire Local Plan was published for comment in September 1999. In taking into account the principles and objectives provided by the then approved structure plan; the Strathclyde Structure Plan and the emerging Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan, a fundamental review of the current green belt was undertaken. Regard was also given to the greenbelt principles set out in the now superseded Circular 24/85.
3.13 The extent of the area surveyed for inclusion in the proposed greenbelt was limited to the area indicated by the structure plan at the time (the Strathclyde Structure Plan) and which was defined in detail in the Review undertaken by the former Kyle and Carrick District Council.
3.14 As part of the process of preparing the Draft Local Plan, a working draft assessment of urban capacity was undertaken, which concluded that there was only 53 hectares of vacant and derelict land in South Ayrshire, with varying degrees of suitability and availability for development. Explicit recognition was given to the Ayrshire Development Strategy of the Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan (2000), and the requirement to provide a range of development opportunities. In so doing, account was taken of the underlying principle that green belts should provide stability and endurance, but that this can only be achieved where there is a balance between the containment and growth of urban development in the longer term.
3.15 Following approval of the Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan in 2000, both the process and the proposed greenbelt were re-assessed and it was concluded the integrity of the greenbelt, identified in the Draft Local Plan, remained intact. However, alterations to the greenbelt boundary were made in respect of two strategic housing sites at North East Troon and South East Ayr, which were withdrawn from the green belt, to reflect the development proposals for the sites. There was also a minor alteration to the boundary at Annbank, to take account of a proposed housing site identified in the South Ayrshire Local Plan.
3.16 Following the South Ayrshire Local Plan Inquiry, the Reporters made a number of recommendations, including in respect of the green belt. The Reporters considered the greenbelt did not properly reflect the greenbelt purposes identified, did not fully conform to the AJSP and was not entirely in line with national guidance. It was recommended the greenbelt be reviewed and, if this could not be completed before the local plan was adopted, an interim greenbelt be introduced. Generally, the Council strongly disagreed with the Reporters’ recommendations (a detailed account of the Reporters’ Findings/ Council’s considerations is set out in Appendix A). In summary, the Council considered the greenbelt methodology to be robust and fulfil the purposes of the greenbelt as set out in the AJSP and government policy. Therefore, no modifications were proposed to the greenbelt, with the exception of the land at the Aerospace Park, Monkton.
3.17 Whilst the Council considered and addressed the Reporters’ findings in respect of the SALP greenbelt, for the purposes of this greenbelt update, the Council needs to ensure the purpose of South Ayrshire’s greenbelt is consistent with both SPP and the adopted AJSP.
4. Evaluation of existing Green Belt against Scottish Planning Policy and the Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan
Scottish Planning Policy
4.1 As mentioned above, national policy on green belts was previously based upon Scottish Office Circular 24/1985: Development in the Countryside and Green Belts. However, the economic, social and environmental context of this policy guidance has changed. This began with the release of SPP21 Green Belts and was reiterated in the now consolidated Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), which was published in February 2010. Paragraph 159 of SPP states that “The purpose of green belt designation in the development plan as part of the settlement strategy for an area is to:
• 1. direct planned growth to the most appropriate locations and support regeneration,
• 2. protect and enhance the quality, character, landscape setting and identity of town and cities, and
• 3. protect and give access to open space within and around town and cities.” 4.2 Green belt designation should provide clarity and certainty on where development will and will not take place, and can have particular benefit where a co-ordinated approach to settlement planning is required across local authority boundaries. Green belt designation should be used to direct development to suitable locations, not to prevent development from happening. For towns and cities with a distinct character and identity that could be harmed by unplanned growth, the use of green belt designation and relevant policies may help to manage that growth more effectively.”
4.3 SPP goes on to state that “ the local development plan should establish the need for a green belt, identify specific boundaries and set out the policy for future development within it including the identification of appropriate uses.” Furthermore, SPP states that “local development plans should reflect the long term settlement strategy and ensure that settlements are able to accommodate planned growth. Inner boundaries should not be drawn to tightly around the urban edge, but where appropriate should create an area suitable for planned development between the existing settlement edge and green belt boundary. Boundaries should also take into account the need for development in smaller settlements within the green belt, and where appropriate leave room for expansion. Green belt boundaries should be clearly identifiable on the ground, using strong visual or physical landscape features such as rivers, tree belts, railways or main roads. Hedges and field enclosures will rarely provide a sufficiently robust boundary. Existing settlements should be excluded from green belt designations in development plans, as should existing major educational and research uses, major business and industrial operations, airports and Ministry of Defence establishments.”
4.4 Finally, SPP recognises that “In addition to supporting the management of the long term growth of a settlement, an effectively managed green belt can be an important resource for access to the countryside, providing a range of opportunities for outdoor recreation, education and tourism, and for protecting and enhancing biodiversity, the landscape and the historic environment. However, it is not a designation designed to safeguard natural heritage resources. Wherever possible, green networks within settlements should extend into the green belt.”
Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan: Growing a Sustainable Ayrshire
4.5 “The Ayrshire Joint Structure Plan: Growing a Sustainable Ayrshire” was approved by Scottish Ministers on 22nd November 2007. The plan sets a vision for Ayrshire in 2025: “Ayrshire will be a competitive place contributing to a thriving Scotland, that is receptive to change, open and welcoming to new people, new ideas, new activities and new ways of living: with strong vibrant communities: a well-connected, growing, diversified and sustainable economy: an excellent quality of life and healthy environment: with all people enjoying the highest levels of prosperity, choice and accessibility in partnership with the wider West of Scotland.”
4.6 As the plan moves forward to 2025 and identifies areas for potential urban expansion, the Structure Plan places a greater emphasis on the landscape setting of communities and the need for areas to be identified where expansion should be restricted. It recognises that in some areas, protection of the landscape setting has already been strengthened by the establishment of greenbelt policy or specific landscape designations. As the protection of the character and setting of communities is of economic, as well as environmental, significance, and thus important to the long-term prosperity of the area, the Structure Plan proposes that strategic and coherent landscape protection measures should be developed jointly in the Core Investment Area to:
• ensure planned growth is directed to the most appropriate locations;
•protect and enhance the character, landscape setting and identity of communities; and
•protect and give access to open space within and around communities as part of the wider structure of green space.
4.7 To provide an appropriate policy context for protecting the landscape setting of the Core Investment Areas within Ayrshire, the Structure Plan suggests the consideration of proposed landscape protection measures should also explore the concept of whether a joint greenbelt may be an appropriate vehicle for delivery. Any proposed landscape protection measures are not intended to prevent the expansion of communities within the area but to guide development through the development plan process to locations within it that are appropriate in environmental terms.
4.8 At present, no green belt designation exists within either North or East Ayrshire, but, in accordance with Structure Plan policy, South Ayrshire Council has discussed and explored the possibility of a joint Ayrshire Green Belt with the other Ayrshire Authorities. However, both North and East Ayrshire Councils considerer it unlikely and unnecessary to identify a green belt within their respective areas, for the following reasons: the need for a green belt did not arise through consultation with either elected Members or the general public; there would only be merit in a joint green belt approach where there were particular concerns in relation to coalescence between Core Investment Areas, or areas of high quality landscape which merited additional protection; the rural area polices, as they currently stand, seem to work well; and there is no pressing need to designate a green belt. Should a joint Ayrshire Green Belt have been a priority, it is envisaged the shared Ayrshire strategic planning service (Ayrshire Joint Planning Unit) would have pursued the matter; and the Council, at this time, considers it to be both reasonable and practical to focus solely on an update of the existing South Ayrshire green belt.
4.9 While the AJSP recognises the importance and purpose of strategic and coherent landscape protection measures, the glossary within the Structure Plan defines a green belt as being “An area of land designated for the purposes of managing the growth of a town or city in the long term where there is a strong presumption against inappropriate development in order to:
• control the growth of built-up areas and complement the process of urban renewal; • prevent neighbouring towns from merging; • preserve the character of towns including their landscape setting; • protect agricultural land from development and create stability for its productive use; • preserve landscape character and provide the necessary stability for its enhancement; and • provide for the enjoyment of the countryside”.
4.11 In general terms, it is considered that the Structure Plan’s definition of a green belt echoes the sentiments of SPP, in respect of the purposes of a green belt. However, as SPP does not consider the protection of agricultural land from development to be a purpose of green belt designation, the SAPLDP will contain rural area policies which will protect agricultural land, and, in particular, Prime Quality Agricultural Land, from inappropriate development. The purpose of this green belt update is therefore to ensure South Ayrshire’s green belt is consistent with Scottish Government policy. The Green Belt will be crucial to the success of growing South Ayrshire’s economy in its outstanding natural environment, as it will support and strengthen the Council’s growth strategy, by restricting unmanaged, unplanned urban growth. 5. Purpose of the Proposed South Ayrshire Local Development Plan green belt update
5.1 A key aim of the green belt update is to inform the local development plan process. Planning Circular 1/09: Development Planning requires that local development plans set out authorities’ general proposals for development in their areas and, in particular, proposals as to where development should and should not occur. South Ayrshire’s green belt clearly has a role to play in fulfilling the latter requirement by contributing to the Spatial Strategy for the area.
5.2 While the Spatial Strategy will guide housing development proposals to the preferred search areas for housing growth, South Ayrshire’s green belt remains fundamental to the success of growing South Ayrshire’s economy in an outstanding natural environment, as it can support and strengthen this strategy by restricting unmanaged, unplanned urban growth. In this way, sites or locations that are not identified in the LDP as areas of growth will be less attractive for development purposes. This, in turn, should increase clarity and certainty on where development will and will not take place.
5.3 Notwithstanding the need to direct housing development proposals to the preferred search areas for housing growth, the green belt will continue to have a role in the protection of landscape setting/ identity, the protection of open space within and around towns, and the prevention of the neighbouring towns of Ayr, Prestwick and Troon from merging.
5.4 It can therefore be concluded that the central purpose of South Ayrshire’s green belt update is to:-
• ensure planned growth is directed to the most appropriate locations;
•protect and enhance the character, landscape setting and identity of communities; and
•protect and give access to open space within and around communities as part of the wider structure of green space.
South Ayrshire’s green belt update will also be used to prevent the coalescence of settlements, although it is recognised that there may be circumstances where coalescence would create a more sustainable settlement pattern. Finally, the green belt update will support the co-ordination and implementation of the Central Scotland Green Network National Development.
6. Establishment of green belt evaluation framework 6.1 This chapter describes the method and approach adopted in establishing a green belt evaluation framework. However before work on the evaluation framework could commence, a suitable study area was identified.
Study Area
6.2 In designating a suitable study area, the Council was mindful that the exercise being undertaken was a green belt update. Therefore, the extent of the area surveyed for consideration of inclusion in the updated green belt was limited to the areas which were previously assessed during the review of the South Ayrshire Local Plan green belt. These areas were identified using the following criteria:
• Parcels, where possible, were to be of a similar character and land use; • Parcels, where possible, were not to cross significant boundaries such as main roads, rivers or woodland; and • Parcels, where possible, were take account of changing landscapes and landform;
As a result 73 discrete parcels of land were identified (Appendix B)
6.3 Evaluation Framework
The criteria used to evaluate and define the purpose of South Ayrshire’s green belt update are detailed in the Evaluation Framework (Appendix C). In order to successfully manage this process, functionality indicators were identified to assess the suitability of each discrete parcel in meeting the purposes of South Ayrshire’s green belt update. While the functionality indicators are detailed fully in the Evaluation Framework, they can reasonably be summarised as follows:-
i) Contribution to Settlement Strategy
As part of the preparation of South Ayrshire Council’s SPALDP, a Spatial Strategy has identified locations where development should and should not occur. An update of the current South Ayrshire green belt is an important step towards ensuring the green belt accords with the LDP spatial strategy. SPP states that land should only be designated as green belt where it will contribute to settlement strategy and therefore the framework evaluates whether a parcel is located within a preferred search area for housing growth.
ii) Landscape Setting/ Identity The assessment of landscape character is pertinent to the review of the green belt. This is because rural and green belt areas, if not carefully managed, will experience significant impact as a result of future growth. It is, therefore, important to understand the sensitivity of these areas to change, so that growth which takes place outside the towns of Ayr Prestwick and Troon can be directed to locations which are least sensitive to change and contribute towards achieving a sustainable pattern of development.
iii) Coalescence
The frameworks evaluates how each parcel fulfils a role in separating settlements in terms of distance of its outer boundary from the nearest neighbouring area.
iv) Green Belt Boundaries
The framework evaluates the boundaries of the existing green belt giving consideration to the guidance set out in SPP that the boundary of the green belt must be clearly identifiable on the ground, using strong visual or physical features, and sufficiently robust to endure for the long term. These features may include rivers, tree belts, railways or main roads and landscape features from the horizon. Hedges and other field enclosures will rarely be sufficiently robust.
v) Protection/Access to Open Space and to Central Scotland Green Network Objectives
The framework evaluates the role of each parcel in providing access to open space. Open space is defined as greenspace consisting of any vegetated land or structure, water, path or geological feature within and on the edges of settlements, and civic space consisting of squares, market places and other paved or hard landscaped areas with a civic function. Furthermore, the framework evaluates the role that each parcel plays in contributing to the vision and goals of the Central Scotland Green Network.
7. Green belt evaluation
7.1 As mentioned above, 73 discrete parcels were surveyed for consideration of inclusion in the updated green belt. Appendix D sets out the assessment of each of these parcels and is accompanied by a matrix which gives an overview of the evaluation process. As can be seen from Appendix D, further consideration was required for 8 of the parcels based on the criteria used to evaluate and define the purpose of South Ayrshire’s green belt update. Generally, further consideration was proposed to either: remove a parcel from the designated green belt, review the boundary of a parcel which is currently designated as green belt or to determine whether there is merit in designating a parcel, or parts of it, as green belt.
7.2 Appendix E sets out the Council’s detailed assessment of the 8 parcels, further consideration of which was proposed based on the criteria used to evaluate and define the purpose of South Ayrshire’s green belt update. In order to simplify the process, the 8 parcels were grouped into 2 separate areas, based on their geographic location and the particular green belt issues which were relevant. The 2 separate areas, which each include a few discrete parcels, are located at Mossblown/ Annbank and the Carrick Hills. Appendix E reviews the parcels located within the particular areas and explains the course of action the Council intends to take, to ensure that South Ayrshire’s green belt is consistent with the purposes and objectives of SPP and the AJSP and the content of the South Ayrshire Proposed Local Development Plan is informed by the green belt update.
8. Conclusion
8.1 The green belt update explains the rationale for, and the approach and methodology behind, the Council’s decision to update its green belt. The update has identified 2 main changes to South Ayrshire’s green belt which can be summarised as follows:
Removal of the designated green belt to the east of Mossblown/ Annbank and redefined green belt boundaries identified. Increased green belt coverage south of Ayr and redefined green belt boundaries identified.
A detailed justification for these green belt changes is included within Appendices D and E, with South Ayrshire’s existing and amended green belt detailed in Appendix F.
8.2 While the update has identified 2 main changes to South Ayrshire’s green belt, it has also concluded that the existing green belt performs well against functionality indicators which are set out in the evaluation framework. In general, it is concluded that South Ayrshire’s green belt: contributes to the SPALSP settlement strategy; contributes to the identity and landscape setting of settlements; protects and gives access to open space in and around towns, which contributes to the vision and goals of the Central Scotland Green Network; has strong defensible boundaries; and prevents the coalescence of settlements.