Impact of Beach Nourishment on Coastal Ecosystems with Recommendations for Coastal Policy in Belgium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Impact of Beach Nourishment on Coastal Ecosystems with Recommendations for Coastal Policy in Belgium Academic year 2012 – 2013 IMPACT OF BEACH NOURISHMENT ON COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COASTAL POLICY IN BELGIUM IMPACT VAN ZANDSUPPLETIE OP KUSTECOSYSTEMEN MET AANBEVELINGEN VOOR HET BELGISCHE KUSTBELEID Sarah Vanden Eede Promotors: Prof. Dr. Magda Vincx Prof. Dr. Steven Degraer IMPACT OF BEACH NOURISHMENT ON COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COASTAL POLICY IN BELGIUM ISBN 9789090278438 EAN 9789090278438 Marine Biology Research Group Campus Sterre – S8 Krijgslaan 281 B-9000 Gent Belgium Academic Year 2012 – 2013 Publically defended on September 20th 2013 Co-authored one or more chapters: Joke Van Tomme, Dries Bonte, Lia Laporta, Klaas Deneudt, Sofie Derous, Jeroen Speybroeck, Charlotte De Busschere, Martijn Vandegehuchte, Eric Stienen, Koen Sabbe, Steven Degraer, Magda Vincx For citation to published work reprinted in this thesis, please refer to the original publications (as mentioned in the beginning of each chapter). Vanden Eede S (2013) Impact of beach nourishment on coastal ecosystems with recommendations for coastal policy in Belgium. Ghent University (UGent), pp. 301 IMPACT OF BEACH NOURISHMENT ON COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COASTAL POLICY IN BELGIUM IMPACT VAN ZANDSUPPLETIE OP KUSTECOSYSTEMEN MET AANBEVELINGEN VOOR HET BELGISCHE KUSTBELEID Sarah Vanden Eede Promotors Prof. Dr. Magda Vincx Prof. Dr. Steven Degraer Academic year 2012 – 2013 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Science, Marine Sciences Members of the reading committee Dr. Angel Borja (AZTI, Spain) Dr. Jeroen Speybroeck (INBO, Brussels, Belgium) Dr. Jan Vanaverbeke (Ghent University, Belgium) Members of the examination committee Dr. Angel Borja (AZTI, Spain) Dr. Jeroen Speybroeck (INBO, Brussels, Belgium) Dr. Jan Vanaverbeke (Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Dries Bonte, Chairman (Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Magda Vincx, Promotor (Ghent University, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Steven Degraer, Promotor (Ghent University, Belgium) Dr. Gert Van Hoey (ILVO, Ostend, Belgium) Prof. Dr. Ann Vanreusel (Ghent University, Belgium) Table of contents Table of contents Table of contents ........................................................................................................................................... xi Dankwoord ................................................................................................................................................. xvii Summary ................................................................................................................................................... xxiii Samenvatting ............................................................................................................................................ xxvii Chapter 1: General introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Coastal zones worldwide ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Sandy shores .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Threats to coastal zones and sandy beaches ............................................................................ 5 2. Belgian coastal zone .......................................................................................................................... 5 3. Belgian coastal ecosystem ................................................................................................................. 7 3.1 Supralittoral zone: vascular plants and strandline fauna .......................................................... 8 3.2 Intertidal and shallow subtidal zone: benthos .......................................................................... 9 3.3 From supralittoral to shallow subtidal: birds and seals .......................................................... 12 4. Threats to the Belgian sandy beach ecosystem .............................................................................. 13 4.1 Coastal defence along the Belgian coastline ........................................................................... 14 4.2 Guidelines for ecologically good practice of beach nourishment along the Belgian coastline18 5. Governance in the Belgian coastal zone ......................................................................................... 19 6. Current coastal governance status in Belgium and Flanders .......................................................... 23 7. Aims of the PhD thesis ..................................................................................................................... 26 8. Outline of the PhD thesis ................................................................................................................. 28 Chapter 2: Assessment of the ecological characteristics of the Belgian beaches prior to the implementation of the Belgian Master Plan for Coastal Safety .................................................................. 31 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 33 2. Material and methods ..................................................................................................................... 35 2.1 Study Area ............................................................................................................................... 35 2.2 Data ......................................................................................................................................... 36 xi Table of contents 2.3 Sampling method .................................................................................................................... 37 2.4 Laboratory procedures ............................................................................................................ 38 2.5 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................ 38 3. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 39 3.1 Partitioning of abiotic and macrobenthic variance on Belgian beaches ................................. 40 3.2 Spatial and temporal macrobenthos variation........................................................................ 41 3.3 Variation within beaches ......................................................................................................... 45 3.4 Niche properties of the dominant species .............................................................................. 48 4. Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 52 4.1 Partitioning of abiotic and macrobenthic variance on Belgian beaches ................................. 52 4.2 Spatial and temporal variation ................................................................................................ 53 4.3 Variation within beaches ......................................................................................................... 53 4.4 Niche properties of the dominant species: a synthesis .......................................................... 54 5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 56 Chapter 3: The monitoring of ‘ecological’ beach nourishment impacts on macrobenthos, within a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) along the Belgian coast ................................................................................... 59 Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... 60 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 61 2. Material and methods ..................................................................................................................... 63 2.1 Study Area ............................................................................................................................... 63 2.2 Data ......................................................................................................................................... 64 2.3 Sampling method .................................................................................................................... 65 2.4 Lab procedures ........................................................................................................................ 65 2.5 Data analysis ............................................................................................................................ 66 3. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 67 3.1 Habitat changes ....................................................................................................................... 68 3.2 Impacts on macrobenthos and recovery ................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Field Experiment on a Nourished Beach
    CHAPTER 157 A Field Experiment on a Nourished Beach A.J. Fernandez* G. Gomez Pina * G. Cuena* J.L. Ramirez* Abstract The performance of a beach nourishment at" Playa de Castilla" (Huel- va, Spain) is evaluated by means of accurate beach profile surveys, vi- sual breaking wave information, buoy-measured wave data and sediment samples. The shoreline recession at the nourished beach due to "profile equilibration" and "spreading out" losses is discussed. The modified equi- librium profile curve proposed by Larson (1991) is shown to accurately describe the profiles with a grain size varying across-shore. The "spread- ing out" losses measured at " Playa de Castilla" are found to be less than predicted by spreading out formulations. The utilization of borrowed material substantially coarser than the native material is suggested as an explanation. 1 INTRODUCTION Fernandez et al. (1990) presented a case study of a sand bypass project at "Playa de Castilla" (Huelva, Spain) and the corresponding monitoring project, that was going to be undertaken. The Beach Nourishment Monitoring Project at the "Playa de Castilla" was begun over two years ago. The project is being *Direcci6n General de Costas. M.O.P.T, Madrid (Spain) 2043 2044 COASTAL ENGINEERING 1992 carried out to evaluate the performance of a beach fill and to establish effective strategies of coastal management and represents one of the most comprehensive monitoring projects that has been undertaken in Spain. This paper summa- rizes and discusses the data set for wave climate, beach profiles and sediment samples. 2 STUDY SITE & MONITORING PROGRAM Playa de Castilla, Fig. 1, is a sandy beach located on the South-West coast of Spain between the Guadiana and Gualdalquivir rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Benthic Amphipod (Crustacea) Fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and Some Environmental Factors Affecting Their Distribution
    ISSN: 0001-5113 ACTA ADRIAT., ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER AADRAY 56(2): 171 - 188, 2015 Benthic amphipod (Crustacea) fauna of the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs and some environmental factors affecting their distribution Ayşegül MÜLAYİM*1, Hüsamettin BALKIS1 and Murat SEZGİN2 1 Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, 34134 Istanbul,Turkey 2Sinop University, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Hydrobiology 57000 Sinop, Turkey *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] This study aims to determine the environmental factors affecting the fauna and distribution of benthic amphipod species inhabiting in the Bandırma and Erdek Gulfs which are located on the south of the Marmara Sea. Total of 66 species belonging to 22 families were identified after analyzing the samples collected seasonally from the depths ranging between 1 and 30 m between 2007- 2008. According to the data gathered from the literature, it was determined that one species (Bathyporeia elegans Watkin, 1938) was a new record for the Turkish seas and 37 species for the Marmara Sea. In the Bandırma Gulf, of the ecological variables of the environment temperature was determined to range between 6.6-27°C, salinity between 21.32-36.03 psu, dissolved oxygen between 4.04-11.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.00-8.38. In the Erdek Gulf, temperature ranged between 6.7 and 27°C, salinity between 21.93-35.54‰, dissolved oxygen between 3.67-13.26 mg l-1and pH between 8.06-8.36. In the surface sediment at the sampling stations of the Bandırma Gulf, total organic carbon values were between 0.07-4.42%, total calcium carbonate between 0.88-84.82%, total phosphorus between 609-12740 μg g-1 and mud percentage between 1.38-79.93%.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Tales
    Metabarcoding reveals different zooplankton communities in northern and southern areas of the North Sea Jan Niklas Macher, Berry B. van der Hoorn, Katja T. C. A. Peijnenburg, Lodewijk van Walraven, Willem Renema Supplementary tables 1-5 Table S1: Sampling stations and recorded abiotic variables recorded during the NICO 10 expedition from the Dutch Coast to the Shetland Islands Sampling site name Coordinates (°N, °E) Mean remperature (°C) Mean salinity (PSU) Depth (m) S74 59.416510, 0.499900 8.2 35.1 134 S37 58.1855556, 0.5016667 8.7 35.1 89 S93 57.36046, 0.57784 7.8 34.8 84 S22 56.5866667, 0.6905556 8.3 34.9 220 S109 56.06489, 1.59652 8.7 35 79 S130 55.62157, 2.38651 7.8 34.8 73 S156 54.88581, 3.69192 8.3 34.6 41 S176 54.41489, 4.04154 9.6 34.6 43 S203 53.76851, 4.76715 11.8 34.5 34 Table S2: Species list and read number per sampling site Class Order Family Genus Species S22 S37 S74 S93 S109 S130 S156 S176 S203 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia clausi 0 0 0 72 0 170 15 630 3995 Copepoda Calanoida Acartiidae Acartia Acartia tonsa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Hydrozoa Trachymedusae Rhopalonematidae Aglantha Aglantha digitale 0 0 0 0 1870 117 420 629 0 Actinopterygii Trachiniformes Ammodytidae Ammodytes Ammodytes marinus 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 35 0 Copepoda Harpacticoida Miraciidae Amphiascopsis Amphiascopsis cinctus 344 0 0 992 2477 2500 9574 8947 0 Ophiuroidea Amphilepidida Amphiuridae Amphiura Amphiura filiformis 0 0 0 0 219 0 0 1470 63233 Copepoda Calanoida Pontellidae Anomalocera Anomalocera patersoni 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bivalvia Venerida
    [Show full text]
  • Littoral Cells, Sand Budgets, and Beaches: Understanding California S
    LITTORAL CELLS, SAND BUDGETS, AND BEACHES: UNDERSTANDING CALIFORNIA’ S SHORELINE KIKI PATSCH GARY GRIGGS OCTOBER 2006 INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF BOATING AND WATERWAYS CALIFORNIA COASTAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT WORKGROUP Littoral Cells, Sand Budgets, and Beaches: Understanding California’s Shoreline By Kiki Patch Gary Griggs Institute of Marine Sciences University of California, Santa Cruz California Department of Boating and Waterways California Coastal Sediment Management WorkGroup October 2006 Cover Image: Santa Barbara Harbor © 2002 Kenneth & Gabrielle Adelman, California Coastal Records Project www.californiacoastline.org Brochure Design & Layout Laura Beach www.LauraBeach.net Littoral Cells, Sand Budgets, and Beaches: Understanding California’s Shoreline Kiki Patsch Gary Griggs Institute of Marine Sciences University of California, Santa Cruz TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 7 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: An Overview of Littoral Cells and Littoral Drift 11 Chapter 3: Elements Involved in Developing Sand Budgets for Littoral Cells 17 Chapter 4: Sand Budgets for California’s Major Littoral Cells and Changes in Sand Supply 23 Chapter 5: Discussion of Beach Nourishment in California 27 Chapter 6: Conclusions 33 References Cited and Other Useful References 35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he coastline of California can be divided into a set of dis- Beach nourishment or beach restoration is the placement of Ttinct, essentially self-contained littoral cells or beach com- sand on the shoreline with the intent of widening a beach that partments. These compartments are geographically limited and is naturally narrow or where the natural supply of sand has consist of a series of sand sources (such as rivers, streams and been signifi cantly reduced through human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine ==- Biology © Springer-Verlag 1988
    Marine Biology 98, 39-49 (1988) Marine ==- Biology © Springer-Verlag 1988 Analysis of the structure of decapod crustacean assemblages off the Catalan coast (North-West Mediterranean) P. Abell6, F.J. Valladares and A. Castell6n Institute de Ciencias del Mar, Passeig Nacional s/n, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain Abstract Zariquiey Alvarez 1968, Garcia Raso 1981, 1982, 1984), as well as different biological aspects of the economically We sampled the communities of decapod crustaceans important species (Sarda 1980, Sarda etal. 1981, etc.). inhabiting the depth zone between 3 and 871 m off the More recently, some studies of the species distribution of Catalan coast (North-West Mediterranean) from June the decapod crustacean communities of the North-West 1981 to June 1983. The 185 samples comprised 90 species Mediterranean have been published (Sarda and Palo- differing widely in their depth distributions. Multivariate mera 1981, Castellon and Abello 1983, Carbonell 1984, analysis revealed four distinct faunistic assemblages, (1) Abello 1986). However, the quantitative composition of littoral communities over sandy bottoms, (2) shelf com­ the decapod crustacean communities of this area remain munities over terrigenous muds, (3) upper-slope com­ largely unknown, and comparable efforts to those of munities, and (4) lower-slope or bathyal communities. The Arena and Li Greci (1973), Relini (1981), or Tunesi (1986) brachyuran crab Liocarcinus depurator is the most abun­ are lacking. dant species of the shelf assemblage, although L. vernalis The present
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Nourishment: Massdep's Guide to Best Management Practices for Projects in Massachusetts
    BBEACHEACH NNOURISHMEOURISHMENNTT MassDEP’sMassDEP’s GuideGuide toto BestBest ManagementManagement PracticesPractices forfor ProjectsProjects inin MassachusettsMassachusetts March 2007 acknowledgements LEAD AUTHORS: Rebecca Haney (Coastal Zone Management), Liz Kouloheras, (MassDEP), Vin Malkoski (Mass. Division of Marine Fisheries), Jim Mahala (MassDEP) and Yvonne Unger (MassDEP) CONTRIBUTORS: From MassDEP: Fred Civian, Jen D’Urso, Glenn Haas, Lealdon Langley, Hilary Schwarzenbach and Jim Sprague. From Coastal Zone Management: Bob Boeri, Mark Borrelli, David Janik, Julia Knisel and Wendolyn Quigley. Engineering consultants from Applied Coastal Research and Engineering Inc. also reviewed the document for technical accuracy. Lead Editor: David Noonan (MassDEP) Design and Layout: Sandra Rabb (MassDEP) Photography: Sandra Rabb (MassDEP) unless otherwise noted. Massachusetts Massachusetts Office Department of of Coastal Zone Environmental Protection Management 1 Winter Street 251 Causeway Street Boston, MA Boston, MA table of contents I. Glossary of Terms 1 II. Summary 3 II. Overview 6 • Purpose 6 • Beach Nourishment 6 • Specifications and Best Management Practices 7 • Permit Requirements and Timelines 8 III. Technical Attachments A. Beach Stability Determination 13 B. Receiving Beach Characterization 17 C. Source Material Characterization 21 D. Sample Problem: Beach and Borrow Site Sediment Analysis to Determine Stability of Nourishment Material for Shore Protection 22 E. Generic Beach Monitoring Plan 27 F. Sample Easement 29 G. References 31 GLOSSARY Accretion - the gradual addition of land by deposition of water-borne sediment. Beach Fill – also called “artificial nourishment”, “beach nourishment”, “replenishment”, and “restoration,” comprises the placement of sediment within the nearshore sediment transport system (see littoral zone). (paraphrased from Dean, 2002) Beach Profile – the cross-sectional shape of a beach plotted perpendicular to the shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • (Marmara Sea) and Ecological Characteristics of Their Habitats
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Eur J Biol 2017; 76(1): 20-5 Decapod Crustaceans in the Marmara Island (Marmara Sea) and Ecological Characteristics of Their Habitats Begum Ayfer, Husamettin Balkis, Aysegul Mulayim* Istanbul University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Istanbul, Turkey Please cite this article as: Ayfer B, Balkis H, Mulayim A. Decapod Crustaceans in the Marmara Island (Marmara Sea) and Ecological Characteristics of Their Habitats. Eur J Biol 2017; 76(1): 20-5. ABSTRACT We have performed series of analyses to identify decapod crustaceans inhabiting the littoral zone of the Marmara Island and to study specific ecological characteristics of the habitat. Samples of decapod crustaceans species were collected from 12 stations (6 onshore, 6 offshore) on May 12-17, 2008 and November 17-22, 2008. A total of 17 species and 1199 specimens of decapod crustaceans were recorded. Eigth species (A. lacazei, N. norvegicus, P. bluteli, P. longimana, P. platycheles, D. pugilator, D. personata and L. vernalis) have been reported in the littoral zone of Marmara Island for the first time in this study. Also our study also sheds light on some ecological properties (temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen) of the habitats of the species from the littoral zone of the Marmara Island. Keywords: Ecology, decapoda, crustacea, Marmara Island, The Sea of Marmara INTRODUCTION The first study at the island was carried out by Ostrou- moff (3,4) followed by studies by Okuş (5), Yüksek (6) The Archipelago in the Sea of Marmara consisting of and Balkıs (7). small and large islands located southwest of the Sea of Marmara and the northwest of the Kapıdağ Peninsula MATERIALS AND METHODS are referred to as the Islands of Marmara.
    [Show full text]
  • Fietsen Met Zeezicht 10 Nieuwe Fietsroutes
    FIETSEN MET ZEEZICHT 10 NIEUWE FIETSROUTES verken het vernieuwde fietsnetwerk aan de Kust! 1 VAN DE PANNE TOT KNOKKE-HEIST e Kust nodigt uit om te fietsen. Een fietstochtje met zeezicht Dbrengt de gezondheid van een mens naar topniveau. Het is heerlijk vertoeven aan de Kust. Elke kustgemeente heeft haar troeven. Strand en zee zijn dichtbij en altijd zijn er mooie en lekkere plekjes om even halt te houden. www.dekust.be Van De Panne tot Knokke-Heist. Voor jong en minder jong. De Kust is een heerlijke bestemming voor een korte dichtbijvakantie. Meer nog, een verblijf aan de Kust doet altijd deugd. Met deze unieke fietspocket ontdek je 10 fietsroutes op het vernieuwde fietsnetwerk aan de Kust. De nieuwe paden, knooppunten, De Panne 6 verbindingsassen op het netwerk Koksijde-Oostduinkerke 10 loodsen je langs mooie natuur, Nieuwpoort 14 adresjes, bezienswaardigheden,... Middelkerke-Westende 18 in elke kustgemeente. Oostende 22 Bredene 26 Veel fietsplezier! De Haan-Wenduine 30 Blankenberge 34 Zeebrugge 38 Knokke-Heist 42 Colofon Realisatie: Westtoer, Dirk Marteel en Helena Wullepit & Roularta Custom Media: Els Vanhuysse, Project Manager Special Products, Meiboomlaan 33, 8800 Roeselare, tel. 051 26 61 11 | Redactie: Sophie Allegaert | Vormgeving: Erik Desombere | Kaartjes: Hans Vanneste | Eindredactie: Evy Alliet • Met dank aan Westtoer voor het ter beschikking stellen van de beelden. Verantwoordelijke uitgever: Sophie Van Iseghem, p/a Roularta Media Group NV, Meiboomlaan 33, 8800 Roeselare. Deze uit- gave is een gratis bijlage bij Nest. Met dank aan de partners voor de informatie. 2 3 ONTDEK HET VERNIEUWDE FIETSNETWERK IN WEST-VLAANDEREN West-Vlaanderen en de Kust in het bijzonder zijn de fiets- bestemming bij uitstek.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Een Zee Van Ruimte: Naar Een Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Voor Het
    EEN ZEE VAN NAARRUIMTE EEN RUIMTELIJK STRUCTUURPLAN VOOR HET DUURZAAM BEHEER VAN DE NOORDZEE COLOFON Dit boek is de weergave van het ruimtelijk-analytisch en ontwerpluik van het GAUFRE-project ‘naar een ruimtelijk structuurplan voor het duurzaam beheer van de zee’. Het volledige wetenschappelijke rapport van dit project is te vinden op de bijgesloten cd-rom. Projectcoördinator: prof.dr. Frank Maes (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) Projectleiding: dr. Jan Schrijvers en prof.dr. Frank Maes (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) Projectmedewerkers: prof. dr. An Cliquet (UGent, Maritiem Instituut), dr Steven Degraer (UGent, Sectie Mariene Biologie), Sofie Derous (UGent, Sectie Mariene Biologie), dr. Bart De Wachter (Ecolas N.V.), Fanny Douvere (UGent, Maritiem Instituut), prof. dr. Frank Maes (UGent, Maritiem Instituut), dr. Jan Schrijvers (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) dr Vera Van Lancker (UGent, Renard Centrum voor Mariene Geologie), Els Verfaillie (UGent, Renard Centrum voor Mariene Geologie), Annemie Volckaert (Ecolas N.V.) Ontwerpteam: ir. arch. Peter Vanden Abeele en arch. An Vanhulle (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) Tekst: ir. arch. Peter Vanden Abeele (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) en arch. An Vanhulle (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) Redactie: prof.dr. Frank Maes, dr. Jan Schrijvers en arch. An Vanhulle (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) Lay-out: arch. An Vanhulle (UGent, Maritiem Instituut) Druk: drukkerij De Windroos, Beernem Druk cd-rom: vzw Nevelland, Landegem Verantwoording van de foto’s en figuren Cover: foto’s van Sven De Bevere en Yvonne Bax, figuren Maritiem Instituut Yvonne Bax: alle foto’s behalve: Sven De Bevere: blz. 60, 61, 64, 68 (bovenste 2 foto’s), 79, 88, 96, 101 (2de en 3de foto), 111, 115, 144, 146-147, 156-157.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W
    Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]