DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W Guidelines for the Capture and Management of Digital Zoological Names Information Francisco W. Welter-Schultes Version 1.1 March 2013 Suggested citation: Welter-Schultes, F.W. (2012). Guidelines for the capture and management of digital zoological names information. Version 1.1 released on March 2013. Copenhagen: Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 126 pp, ISBN: 87-92020-44-5, accessible online at http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. ISBN: 87-92020-44-5 (10 digits), 978-87-92020-44-4 (13 digits). Persistent URI: http://www.gbif.org/orc/?doc_id=2784. Language: English. Copyright © F. W. Welter-Schultes & Global Biodiversity Information Facility, 2012. Disclaimer: The information, ideas, and opinions presented in this publication are those of the author and do not represent those of GBIF. License: This document is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0. Document Control: Version Description Date of release Author(s) 0.1 First complete draft. January 2012 F. W. Welter- Schultes 0.2 Document re-structured to improve February 2012 F. W. Welter- usability. Available for public Schultes & A. review. González-Talaván 1.0 First public version of the June 2012 F. W. Welter- document. Schultes 1.1 Minor editions March 2013 F. W. Welter- Schultes Cover Credit: GBIF Secretariat, 2012. Image by Levi Szekeres (Romania), obtained by stock.xchng (http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1389360). March 2013 ii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 Table of Contents How to use this book ......................................................................... 1 SECTION I 1. Introduction ................................................................................ 2 1.1. Identifiers and the role of Linnean names ......................................... 2 1.1.1 Identifiers ................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Taxon concept models .................................................................... 3 1.1.3 How unique is a zoological name? ....................................................... 5 1.1.4 The problem of variant spellings of Linnean names .................................. 6 1.2 Biological background: What are zoological species, genera, families, higher groups? ........................................................................................ 6 1.3 Differences between zoology and botany ........................................... 7 1.4 How zoological names are formed ................................................... 8 1.4.1 Difference between nomenclature and taxonomy .................................... 8 1.4.2 Latin script and character encoding .................................................... 9 1.4.3 Binominal and polynominal names ...................................................... 9 1.4.4 Original and current combination of species .......................................... 10 1.4.5 Taxonomic ranks: hierarchy of names ................................................. 12 1.4.6 Derivation of names ...................................................................... 16 1.5 Some general notes about the ICZN Code and official zoological bodies .... 16 1.5.1 The nature of the ICZN Code ............................................................ 16 1.5.2 Limits of acceptance in the community ............................................... 17 1.6 The spirit of zoological nomenclature, basic rules of the ICZN Code ......... 18 2. Best practices and recommendations in the handling of taxonomic and nomenclatural data ......................................................................... 20 2.1 How to cite the original spelling and the original combination ................ 20 2.2 Stability and occasional change of genus-species names ....................... 22 2.3 Taxonomy or nomenclature: why do names change? ............................ 23 2.4 When should a name be changed? Best practice guide for changing names or not ........................................................................................... 24 2.5 Brief recommendations for establishing new names ............................ 25 3. Best practice guide for spellings of taxon name author strings ................ 28 March 2013 iii Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 SECTION II 4. Verifying the correctness of a name: how to find and cite the original name ................................................................................................. 30 4.1 How to find published work ......................................................... 31 4.1.1 Technical preconditions: printed paper ............................................... 31 4.1.2 Helpful resources to find original publications ....................................... 32 4.2 Best practice guide to cite zoological literature ................................. 33 4.2.1 Differences between monographs, journal articles and articles in monographic works ............................................................................................... 34 4.2.2 Name of the author(s) of a publication ................................................ 35 4.2.3 Year of publication ....................................................................... 40 4.2.4 Title of the work .......................................................................... 41 4.2.5 Journal titles .............................................................................. 45 4.2.6 Page numbers, plate numbers .......................................................... 47 4.2.7 Locality of publication and publisher .................................................. 49 5. Is the name available? .................................................................. 50 5.1 Published and unpublished work ................................................... 50 5.2 Did the author apply binominal nomenclature? .................................. 52 5.2.1 Style of the work .......................................................................... 52 5.2.2 Use of non-binominal names ............................................................ 53 5.3 "Used as valid" when proposed...................................................... 54 5.3.1 Names cited in pure documentations of other sources .............................. 55 5.3.2 Alternate names for the same taxon ................................................... 55 5.3.3 Unclear and conditional classifications ................................................ 56 5.4 Was the name new when proposed? ............................................... 56 5.4.1 Sensu names ............................................................................... 57 5.4.2 Deliberate misidentifications ........................................................... 58 5.5 The frame within which a name can be spelled ................................. 58 5.6 Special requirements for availability .............................................. 60 5.6.1 Requirements for genera ................................................................ 60 5.6.2 Requirements for species ................................................................ 60 6. Can the name be used? ................................................................. 64 6.1 Available names which cannot be used ........................................... 64 6.1.1 Homonyms ................................................................................. 64 6.1.2 Synonyms ................................................................................... 66 6.1.3 Names rejected under Art. 23.9 ........................................................ 67 March 2013 iv Guidelines for the management of digital zoological names information Version 1.1 6.1.4 Names suppressed by the Commission ................................................. 67 6.2 Unavailable names which can be used ............................................ 68 6.2.1 Art. 11.6: validated synonyms .......................................................... 68 7. Special chapter: new replacement names .......................................... 70 8. How is the name correctly spelled? .................................................. 74 8.1 The names of genus and species ................................................... 74 8.1.1 Incorrect original spellings that must be corrected .................................. 74 8.1.2 Names that must not be corrected ..................................................... 79 8.1.3 Selection procedure between two equivalent original spellings ................... 82 8.1.4 Treatment of subsequently modified spellings of names ........................... 82 8.1.5 Prevailing usage ........................................................................... 84 8.1.6 Gender agreement ........................................................................ 86 8.2 The name of the author ............................................................. 93 8.2.1 How to determine who is the author ................................................... 94 8.2.2 Spelling of the author .................................................................... 99 8.3 The correct year in a name ........................................................ 108 9. Types, type designations, type locality ........................................... 111 9.1 Type species of genera ............................................................. 111 9.1.1 How to determine the type species. ................................................. 111 9.2 Types of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS ROMANIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/28E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Romania. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). Overview of forest pests - Romania TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests and diseases................................................................................................. 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions
    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
    [Show full text]
  • Apiaceae) - Beds, Old Cambs, Hunts, Northants and Peterborough
    CHECKLIST OF UMBELLIFERS (APIACEAE) - BEDS, OLD CAMBS, HUNTS, NORTHANTS AND PETERBOROUGH Scientific name Common Name Beds old Cambs Hunts Northants and P'boro Aegopodium podagraria Ground-elder common common common common Aethusa cynapium Fool's Parsley common common common common Ammi majus Bullwort very rare rare very rare very rare Ammi visnaga Toothpick-plant very rare very rare Anethum graveolens Dill very rare rare very rare Angelica archangelica Garden Angelica very rare very rare Angelica sylvestris Wild Angelica common frequent frequent common Anthriscus caucalis Bur Chervil occasional frequent occasional occasional Anthriscus cerefolium Garden Chervil extinct extinct extinct very rare Anthriscus sylvestris Cow Parsley common common common common Apium graveolens Wild Celery rare occasional very rare native ssp. Apium inundatum Lesser Marshwort very rare or extinct very rare extinct very rare Apium nodiflorum Fool's Water-cress common common common common Astrantia major Astrantia extinct very rare Berula erecta Lesser Water-parsnip occasional frequent occasional occasional x Beruladium procurrens Fool's Water-cress x Lesser very rare Water-parsnip Bunium bulbocastanum Great Pignut occasional very rare Bupleurum rotundifolium Thorow-wax extinct extinct extinct extinct Bupleurum subovatum False Thorow-wax very rare very rare very rare Bupleurum tenuissimum Slender Hare's-ear very rare extinct very rare or extinct Carum carvi Caraway very rare very rare very rare extinct Chaerophyllum temulum Rough Chervil common common common common Cicuta virosa Cowbane extinct extinct Conium maculatum Hemlock common common common common Conopodium majus Pignut frequent occasional occasional frequent Coriandrum sativum Coriander rare occasional very rare very rare Daucus carota Wild Carrot common common common common Eryngium campestre Field Eryngo very rare, prob.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants Eudicots Apiales, Gentianales (Except Rubiaceae)
    Edited by K. Kubitzki Volume XV Flowering Plants Eudicots Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae) Joachim W. Kadereit · Volker Bittrich (Eds.) THE FAMILIES AND GENERA OF VASCULAR PLANTS Edited by K. Kubitzki For further volumes see list at the end of the book and: http://www.springer.com/series/1306 The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants Edited by K. Kubitzki Flowering Plants Á Eudicots XV Apiales, Gentianales (except Rubiaceae) Volume Editors: Joachim W. Kadereit • Volker Bittrich With 85 Figures Editors Joachim W. Kadereit Volker Bittrich Johannes Gutenberg Campinas Universita¨t Mainz Brazil Mainz Germany Series Editor Prof. Dr. Klaus Kubitzki Universita¨t Hamburg Biozentrum Klein-Flottbek und Botanischer Garten 22609 Hamburg Germany The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ISBN 978-3-319-93604-8 ISBN 978-3-319-93605-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93605-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018961008 # Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaco Le Journal Électronique De La Malacologie Continentale Française
    MalaCo Le journal électronique de la malacologie continentale française www.journal-malaco.fr MalaCo (ISSN 1778-3941) est un journal électronique gratuit, annuel ou bisannuel pour la promotion et la connaissance des mollusques continentaux de la faune de France. Equipe éditoriale Jean-Michel BICHAIN / Paris / [email protected] Xavier CUCHERAT / Audinghen / [email protected] Benoît FONTAINE / Paris / [email protected] Olivier GARGOMINY / Paris / [email protected] Vincent PRIE / Montpellier / [email protected] Les manuscrits sont à envoyer à : Journal MalaCo Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle Equipe de Malacologie Case Postale 051 55, rue Buffon 75005 Paris Ou par Email à [email protected] MalaCo est téléchargeable gratuitement sur le site : http://www.journal-malaco.fr MalaCo (ISSN 1778-3941) est une publication de l’association Caracol Association Caracol Route de Lodève 34700 Saint-Etienne-de-Gourgas JO Association n° 0034 DE 2003 Déclaration en date du 17 juillet 2003 sous le n° 2569 Journal électronique de la malacologie continentale française MalaCo Septembre 2006 ▪ numéro 3 Au total, 119 espèces et sous-espèces de mollusques, dont quatre strictement endémiques, sont recensées dans les différents habitats du Parc naturel du Mercantour (photos Olivier Gargominy, se reporter aux figures 5, 10 et 17 de l’article d’O. Gargominy & Th. Ripken). Sommaire Page 100 Éditorial Page 101 Actualités Page 102 Librairie Page 103 Brèves & News ▪ Endémisme et extinctions : systématique des Endodontidae (Mollusca, Pulmonata) de Rurutu (Iles Australes, Polynésie française) Gabrielle ZIMMERMANN ▪ The first annual meeting of Task-Force-Limax, Bünder Naturmuseum, Chur, Switzerland, 8-10 September, 2006: presentation, outcomes and abstracts Isabel HYMAN ▪ Collecting and transporting living slugs (Pulmonata: Limacidae) Isabel HYMAN ▪ A List of type specimens of land and freshwater molluscs from France present in the national molluscs collection of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Henk K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malacological Society of London
    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This meeting was made possible due to generous contributions from the following individuals and organizations: Unitas Malacologica The program committee: The American Malacological Society Lynn Bonomo, Samantha Donohoo, The Western Society of Malacologists Kelly Larkin, Emily Otstott, Lisa Paggeot David and Dixie Lindberg California Academy of Sciences Andrew Jepsen, Nick Colin The Company of Biologists. Robert Sussman, Allan Tina The American Genetics Association. Meg Burke, Katherine Piatek The Malacological Society of London The organizing committee: Pat Krug, David Lindberg, Julia Sigwart and Ellen Strong THE MALACOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON 1 SCHEDULE SUNDAY 11 AUGUST, 2019 (Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA) 2:00-6:00 pm Registration - Merrill Hall 10:30 am-12:00 pm Unitas Malacologica Council Meeting - Merrill Hall 1:30-3:30 pm Western Society of Malacologists Council Meeting Merrill Hall 3:30-5:30 American Malacological Society Council Meeting Merrill Hall MONDAY 12 AUGUST, 2019 (Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, CA) 7:30-8:30 am Breakfast - Crocker Dining Hall 8:30-11:30 Registration - Merrill Hall 8:30 am Welcome and Opening Session –Terry Gosliner - Merrill Hall Plenary Session: The Future of Molluscan Research - Merrill Hall 9:00 am - Genomics and the Future of Tropical Marine Ecosystems - Mónica Medina, Pennsylvania State University 9:45 am - Our New Understanding of Dead-shell Assemblages: A Powerful Tool for Deciphering Human Impacts - Sue Kidwell, University of Chicago 2 10:30-10:45
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • Amaia Caro Aramendia
    The genus Pyrenaearia (Gastropoda, Helicoidea): Molecular and Morphological Systematics, Biogeography and Population Dynamics Pyrenaearia generoa (Gastropoda, Helicoidea): Sistematika Molekularra eta Morfologikoa, Biogeografia eta Populazio Dinamika PhD thesis Vitoria-Gasteiz, 2019 Amaia Caro Aramendia The genus Pyrenaearia (Gastropoda, Helicoidea): Molecular and Morphological Systematics, Biogeography and Population Dynamics Pyrenaearia generoa (Gastropoda, Helicoidea): Sistematika Molekularra eta Morfologikoa, Biogeografia eta Populazio Dinamika A thesis submitted by Amaia Caro Aramendia for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, under the supervision of Dr. Benjamín Juan Gómez-Moliner and Dr. María José Madeira University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, 2019 Zoologia eta Animalia Biologia Zelulen Saila Dpto. Zoología y Biología Celular Animal (cc)2019 AMAIA CARO ARAMENDIA (cc by-nc-nd 4.0) Astiro igo, barraskilotxo Fuji mendia da hau! Kobayashi Issa-ren haikua To the little things that run the world Esker onak Acknowledgements Tesi bat ez da pertsona bakar batena, bidean zehar laguntzen duten pertsona guztiei esker sortutako lana da eta, beraz, lehen orriek haien laguntza eskertzeko izan behar dute: En primer lugar me gustaría agradecer a mis directores, Benjamín Gómez-Moliner y María José Madeira. A Benjamín, por darme la oportunidad de entrar en el grupo de investigación y confiar en que podría realizar esta tesis. Gracias por compartir tus extensos conocimientos y por descubrirme el mundo de la malacología, que sin duda no habría encontrado por mi cuenta y ha resultado de lo más interesante. A Marijo, porque desde el principio y hasta el final has estado siempre ahí para guiarme, animarme y para ayudarme en todo lo que hiciese falta pero, sobre todo, por mostrarme que es posible compaginar este trabajo con una vida fuera de él.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Biodiversity Patterns and Their Conservation in the Azorean
    Systematics and Biodiversity 6 (2): 249–282 Issued 6 June 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477200008002648 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum ∗ Paulo A.V. Borges1 & Joerg Wunderlich2 Spider biodiversity patterns and their 1Azorean Biodiversity Group, Departamento de Ciˆencias conservation in the Azorean archipelago, Agr´arias, CITA-A, Universidade dos Ac¸ores. Campus de Angra, with descriptions of new species Terra-Ch˜a; Angra do Hero´ısmo – 9700-851 – Terceira (Ac¸ores); Portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Oberer H¨auselbergweg 24, Abstract In this contribution, we report on patterns of spider species diversity of 69493 Hirschberg, Germany. the Azores, based on recently standardised sampling protocols in different hab- Email: joergwunderlich@ t-online.de itats of this geologically young and isolated volcanic archipelago. A total of 122 species is investigated, including eight new species, eight new records for the submitted December 2005 Azorean islands and 61 previously known species, with 131 new records for indi- accepted November 2006 vidual islands. Biodiversity patterns are investigated, namely patterns of range size distribution for endemics and non-endemics, habitat distribution patterns, island similarity in species composition and the estimation of species richness for the Azores. Newly described species are: Oonopidae – Orchestina furcillata Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Linyphiinae – Porrhomma borgesi Wunderlich; Turinyphia cavernicola Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Micronetinae – Agyneta depigmentata Wunderlich; Linyph- iidae:
    [Show full text]
  • Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes
    Bugs and Beasties of the Western Rhodopes (a photoguide to some lesser-known species) by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser [email protected] Yagodina At Honeyguide, we aim to help you experience the full range of wildlife in the places we visit. Generally we start with birds, flowers and butterflies, but we don’t ignore 'other invertebrates'. In the western Rhodopes they are just so abundant and diverse that they are one of the abiding features of the area. While simply experiencing this diversity is sufficient for some, as naturalists many of us want to know more, and in particular to be able to give names to what we see. Therein lies the problem: especially in eastern Europe, there are few books covering the invertebrates in any comprehensive way. Hence this photoguide – while in no way can this be considered an ‘eastern Chinery’, it at least provides a taster of the rich invertebrate fauna you may encounter, based on a couple of Honeyguide holidays we have led in the western Rhodopes during June. We stayed most of the time in a tight area around Yagodina, and almost anything we saw could reasonably be expected to be seen almost anywhere around there in the right habitat. Most of the photos were taken in 2014, with a few additional ones from 2012. While these creatures have found their way into the lists of the holiday reports, relatively few have been accompanied by photos. We have attempted to name the species depicted, using the available books and the vast resources of the internet, but in many cases it has not been possible to be definitive and the identifications should be treated as a ‘best fit’.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on 38 Rare for the Lithuanian Fauna Lepidoptera Species Recorded in 2019
    42 BULLETIN OF THE LITHUANIAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Volume 3 (31) NEW DATA ON 38 RARE FOR THE LITHUANIAN FAUNA LEPIDOPTERA SPECIES RECORDED IN 2019 VYTAUTAS INOKAITIS, BRIGITA PAULAVIČIŪTĖ T. Ivanauskas Museum of Zoology, Laisvės al. 106 LT-44253 Kaunas, Lithuania. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Lepidoptera is one of the most widespread and widely recognizable insect orders in the world. It can show many variations of the basic body structure that have evolved to gain advantages in lifestyle and distribution. We can find more than 180,000 species of Lepidoptera in the world, which belong to 126 families and 46 superfamilies (Mallet, 2007). There are 482 species in Europe, 451 of them being found in the 27 member states. Almost a third of these species (142 species) are endemic to Europe (Van Swaay et al., 2008). Today more than 2500 species of Lepidoptera are known in Lithuania. Every year new and rare species for Lithuania fauna are discovered (Ivinskis & Rimšaitė, 2018). This article presents new data on 38 rare for Lithuania moth and butterflies species. They were registered in 4 administrative districts of Lithuania. One species - Chariaspilates formosaria (Eversmann, 1837) is included in the Red Data Book of Lithuania (Rašomavičius, 2007). Material and Methods List of localities Locality Administrative district Coordinates (LAT, LONG) Braziūkai Kaunas district 54.901195 , 23.483855 Kaunas Kaunas district 54.904578 , 23.913688 Laumikoniai Molėtai district 55.051322 , 25.447034 Paliepės Miškas f. (1) Varėna
    [Show full text]