Foot Stamps On· Left

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foot Stamps On· Left INSIDE: POLAND THE LAW FORD'S PARLIAMENT Labour movement must , Shipyard workers in The Lenin shipyards, Gdansk THE BRUTAL CRUSHING by blood of El Salvador's workers and ed only to restore capitalist exploit­ have with the bureaucrats in Poland ists released. On the other hand, Jaruzelski of the Polish workers' un­ peasants. Thatcher is the murderer, ation in poland. All-party rallies like and the USSR. Government or trade union bans on ions - with hundreds killed and in­ of 10 Irish hungec strikers - her gov­ "that at the Albert Hall on January Against them we should fight in exports - whether of food pr tech- jured, thousands arrested and sent ernment is presiding over repression 4th should be boycotted. every section of the workers move- nology injure the Polish workers to concentration camps"- musf call in Northern Ireland-very similar to Instead we need a massive indep­ ment for meetings in the workplaces, and aid Reagan and Thatcher's war forth the maximum immediate sol­ Jaruzelski's. endent mobilization of the Labour for union branch meetings to pledge drive. idarity from workers in all count­ Representatives of the Tories movement in solidarity with the. support for the Polish workers. The We should raise financial support ries. should not be allowed to share any Polish workers. The silence of TUC should be forced to call a mass for the Polish union's struggle. In We must express through our un­ platforms with the representatives many union leaders· in fact the demonstration in support of the short we must create a Labour Move- ions and political parties our class of the labour movement. The$e back­ right-wingers have made the runn­ Polish unions. ment Campaign to support the Pol· solidarity with Solidarnosc. Thatcher ers of the Turkish military dictator­ ing - indicates the deep sympathy We must fight for trade union ac- ish workers' resistance to the Stal- and Reagan's crocodile tears are no ship, of Pinochet and Duarte are not many top officials, particularly tion to black all Polish imports un· inist military dictators whose actions use to the Polish workers. interested in democratic rights or those in, or close to the Stalinist til trade union rights are restored are a cruel mockery of every prin- Reagan's hands are red with the free trade unions. They are concern- Communist Party of Great Britain, and all Solidarnosc leaders and activ- ciple of revolutionary communism .• FOOT STAMPS ON· LEFT THE REALISATION 0 F just how "My aim is to ensure that Labour triumphs the Right to "take a stand", or face more eenn in fact has virtually absolved Foot order not to be swept away. The right frayile the yains of the LaDour Left again. But not the Labour Party as it defections to the SDP, for Foot the key from responsibility for the purge, argu"ing has already declared its intentions· actually are must have come as a has com~ to I~o.k in the .Iast ~ew months." thing was the possibility of driving a wedge in his Rotherhithe speech the day before Callaghan demands the expulsion of the nasty shock to many socialists in F??t IS a wlllin~ tool In thiS ~trategy. between Benn and his supporters. This is the NEC,that Foot did not personally Militant tendency and the disaffiliation the Laoour Part. In one short month Ternfl.ed by ~he rISe o.f the S?~lal De~o- why Foot made the issue one of defending want it but was forced to do it by the of the Young Socialists, as well as rolling y crats, In particular Shlrley Wllliams'vlc, Parliamentary Democracy, an issue so right I Of course to do otherwise would back the election system for the leader ani Foot ~as ma~aged to launch an toryat Crosby, Foot has launched a close to Benn's heart as well, and linked mean challenging Foot for the leadership, deputy leader. Hattersley of the Labour offenSive which threatens to ren· carefully conceived purge. He aims to it to the question of a purge on Militant. which is something that, despite Socialist Solidarity Campaign adds the CLPD and der null and void conference decis- signal to the Bennites that they have Challenge's pretences, Benn will not do. London Labour Briefing as subjects for ions on reselection of MPs, to open gone too far in mobilising the base of the Foot and the ambitious unprincipled Even the proposed picket of the NEC, investigation. up a Witch-hunt on the left of the party against the leadership, often in Neil Kinnock are willing to ally them· called by Bermondsey Labour Party, and Party ana slam the uoor on the en- alliance with "Trotskyists". At the same selves with the right to force Benn to which was gathering wide support/was I n this situation where the Righ·( is on try of self-proclaimed marxists into time Foot hop~s that t~is will ~e enoug~ break with the most active and militant called off because of the Bennites' fear the offensive and Foot is in collusion with the Party. To those used to ueing to pla.cat~ the right. It IS Benn s unforglve- ,sections of his supporters thus weakening of "alienating" potential supporters on them, it is disastrous for the supporters of Benn and democratic reforms in the fed.on the "momentous victories. able Sin, In th~ eyes of th~ Labour Party, the left still further. At the same time the NEC. .. and Trade Union leadership, to have the NEC's rejection of Tatchell serves Labour Party to back pedal or try and kee Benn's closest supporters in the party, DI~gest advances ever diet of much taken his disagreements outside the gentle- notice on the constituencies that the N EC their alliance with Foot. Every attempt far from mobilising a common front to of the left press, this m ust truly manly framework of the P LP and TU and not the rank and file will decide on to isolate the Left withi n the Party must fight in defence of "Militant" and against have been a bewildering experience. leadership and to have appealed instead Who will stand as MP whatever conference be challenged. Bermondsey and every the right·wing offensive, have been taking As we said after the Sept. 81 Brighton to the rank and file of the party and decisions say. Foot only needs now to other constituency where the NEC vetoes Conference"the conference itself was a even, to a lesser extent, the trade unions. consolidate this position by lining up the their distance from the "hard left". Not democratically elected candidates,must decisive victory for the anti·reform, anti· In this Benn had to rely on the willing trade union block votes and thus ensure only did the most' recent meeting of the refuse to back down. If genuine candidate Benn forces" (W.P.No.26, Oct.81). footsoldiers of the centrist left- who a united right/centre-left front at the LCC spurn yet again the idea of a unified of local labour parties have to be stood The new coalition which emerged from with their members, committment and next conference. This undoubtedly will "Bennite" organisation in the face of the against NEC imposed ones then the res· Brighton of Right and Centre· Right newspapers - Militant, Socialist Challenge be the major' purpose of the conference right wing onslaught, but concentrated ponsibility for splitting the Labour votes trade union block votes ensured that the and Socialist Organiser' provided an impor· organised by the "Trade Unions for a on calling for an "open register" of all lies with the Right labour bureaucrats, lefts hold on the N.E.C. was broken, and tant spine to Benn's campaign. Labour Victory" of trade union leaders left organisations withi n the Labour Party­ not with the Left. Every attempt must that the manifesto remained securely This is the significance of Foot's block· and leading NEC members. a decision which the Guardian comments be made to link up individuals, wards, in the hands of Foot and the PLP. These ing of TatcheWs nomination. The nom· was "indicative of the belief within the and constituencies in a national body ' t th' committee that while it has nothing to were the weapons handed by the Right ination of Tatchell undoubtedly enraged Benn s response 0 e coming purge committed to fighting every purge and to Foot who was determined he should the Right, not because of his politics· has been predictable. While declaring hide, oth.er gro~ps may b? less r~ad~, to expulsion. Most importantly" this use them to the full to discipline the which are closer to Peter Hain than Ted his willingness to "fight like a tiger to open t~elr affairS to publiC scrutinY means fighting in the unions to take the left. Only in this way could the right Grant, but because he represented the prevent expulsions and proscriptions" the - (Guardian, Dec.23,811. bloc votes out of the hands of the bureau­ hope:to remove the obstacle to "their" breaking of the stranglehold of the Right animal in question appears a particularly crats and under the control of the rank party becoming once again the trusted wing over a key constituency. Bob Mellish, toothless specimen. Despite Socialist Foot appears to be succeeding and file. Only this can guarantee the alternative party of the bourgeoisie and doyen of the Right/and his cronies on Challenge's belief that Benn has made in his intention of isolating the hard left, defeat of Foot's plans Within the party.
Recommended publications
  • The Speaker of the House of Commons: the Office and Its Holders Since 1945
    The Speaker of the House of Commons: The Office and Its Holders since 1945 Matthew William Laban Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2014 1 STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I, Matthew William Laban, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work or that where it has been carried out in collaboration with, or supported by others, that this is duly acknowledged below and my contribution indicated. Previously published material is also acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other intellectual Property Right, or contain any confidential material. I accept that the College has the right to use plagiarism detection software to check the electronic version of this thesis. I confirm that this thesis has not been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other university. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. Signature: Date: Details of collaboration and publications: Laban, Matthew, Mr Speaker: The Office and the Individuals since 1945, (London, 2013). 2 ABSTRACT The post-war period has witnessed the Speakership of the House of Commons evolving from an important internal parliamentary office into one of the most recognised public roles in British political life. This historic office has not, however, been examined in any detail since Philip Laundy’s seminal work entitled The Office of Speaker published in 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Cut Off in the Original 232 6
    IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk TEXT CUT OFF IN THE ORIGINAL 232 6 ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE Between 1983 and 1989 there were a series of important changes to Party organisation. Some of these were deliberately pursued, some were more unexpected. All were critical causes, effects and aspects of the transformation. Changes occurred in PLP whipping, Party finance, membership administration, disciplinary procedures, candidate selection, the policy-making process and, most famously, campaign organisation. This chapter makes a number of assertions about this process of organisational change which are original and are inspired by and enhance the search for complexity. It is argued that the organisational aspect of the transformation of the 1980s resulted from multiple causes and the inter-retroaction of those causes rather than from one over-riding cause. In particular, the existing literature has identified organisational reform as originating with a conscious pursuit by the core leadership of greater control over the Party (Heffernan ~\ . !.. ~ and Marqusee 1992: passim~ Shaw 1994: 108). This chapter asserts that while such conscious .... ~.. ,', .. :~. pursuit was one cause, other factors such as ad hoc responses to events .. ,t~~" ~owth of a presidential approach, the use of powers already in existence and the decline of oppositional forces acted as other causes. This emphasis upon multiple causes of change is clearly in keeping with the search for complexity. 233 This chapter also represents the first detailed outline and analysis of centralisation as it related not just to organisational matters but also to the issue of policy-making. In the same vein the chapter is particularly significant because it relates the centralisation of policy-making to policy reform as it occurred between 1983 and 1987 not just in relation to the Policy Review as is the approach of previous analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Members 1979-2010
    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • GO EAST: UNLOCKING the POTENTIAL of the THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims
    GO EAST: UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF THE THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims Published by Centre for London, February 2014 Open Access. Some rights reserved. Centre for London is a politically independent, As the publisher of this work, Centre for London wants to encourage the not-for-profit think tank focused on the big challenges circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. facing London. It aims to help London build on its We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform long history as a centre of economic, social, and or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written intellectual innovation and exchange, and create a permission. This is subject to the terms of the Centre for London licence. fairer, more inclusive and sustainable city. Its interests Its main conditions are: range across economic, environmental, governmental and social issues. · Centre for London and the author(s) are credited Through its research and events, the Centre acts · This summary and the address www.centreforlondon.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full as a critical friend to London’s leaders and policymakers, · The work is not resold promotes a wider understanding of the challenges · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Centre for London. facing London, and develops long-term, rigorous and You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other radical solutions for the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • This House Exploring the Play at Home
    This House Exploring the Play at Home If you’re watching This House at home and would like to find out more out the production, there are a number of different resources that you can explore. About the Production This production of This House by James Graham was first performed at the National Theatre in 2012. The production was directed by Jeremy Herrin. The play explores life in the corridors of Westminster in 1974. You can find full details of the cast and production team below: Cast Labour Whips Bob Mellish: Phil Daniels Walter Harrison: Reece Dinsdale Michael Cocks/ Joe Harper: Vincent Franklin Ann Taylor: Lauren O’Neil Tory Whips Humphrey Atkins: Julian Wadham Jack Weatherill: Charles Edwards Fred Silvester: Ed Hughes The Members Chorus Clockmaker/Peebles/ Redditch/ Birmingham Perry Barr: Gunnar Cauthery Woolwich West/Batley & Morley/ Western Isles: Christopher Godwin Walsall North/Serjeant at Arms Act I/ Speaker Act II/Plymouth Sutton: Andrew Havill Rochester & Chatham/Welwyn & Hatfield/ Coventry South West/Lady Batley: Helena Lymbery Paddington South/Chelmsford/ South Ayrshire/Henley: Matthew Pidgeon Speaker Act I/Mansfield/ Serjeant at Arms Act II/ West Lothian: Giles Taylor Bromsgrove/Abingdon/ Liverpool Edge Hill/ Paisley/Fermanagh: Tony Turner Esher/Belfast West: Rupert Vansittart All other parts played by members of the Company Musicians Acoustic Jim & The Wires: Jim Hustwit (Music Director/guitar), Sam Edgington (bass) and Cristiano Castellitto (drums). Guest Vocals: Gunnar Cauthery and Phil Daniels Creative Team Director: Jeremy Herrin Designer: Rae Smith Lighting Designer: Paul Anderson Music: Stephen Warbeck Choreographer: Scott Ambler Sound Designer : Ian Dickinson Associate Director: Joe Murphy Original Lighting Designer: Paule Constable Company Voice Work: Richard Ryder Dialect Coach: Penny Dyer You might like to use the internet to research some of these artists to find out more about their careers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Premiers: Salisbury to Blair
    A Century of Premiers Salisbury to Blair Dick Leonard A Century of Premiers Also by Dick Leonard THE BACKBENCHER AND PARLIAMENT (ed. with Val Herman) CROSLAND AND NEW LABOUR (ed.) THE ECONOMIST GUIDE TO THE EUROPEAN UNION ELECTIONS IN BRITAIN: A Voter’s Guide (with Roger Mortimore) GUIDE TO THE GENERAL ELECTION PAYING FOR PARTY POLITICS THE PRO-EUROPEAN READER (ed. with Mark Leonard) THE SOCIALIST AGENDA: Crosland’s Legacy (ed. with David Lipsey) WORLD ATLAS OF ELECTIONS (with Richard Natkiel) A Century of Premiers Salisbury to Blair Dick Leonard © Dick Leonard 2005 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2005 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MACMILLAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin’s Press, LLC and of Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmillan® is a registered trademark in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • 6August 1982
    6 August 1982 The- real. mafia man vu lga r-minde dvand very much the he would not seek re-election) the Ber- Bob Mellish ha-sretired from the ", supporter of whoever is his boss at the mondsey Labour Party selected their sesre- Labour Party amid a blaze of . moment'. Mellish was an eager placeman, tary Peter Tatchell as the prospective- can- accusations of 'mafia tactics' and 'hit and has wanted 'desperately to be a Cabinet didate.' Mellish effectively 'blackmailed- Minister responsible for London and for Michael FOQt into. a public repudiation of lists' levelled at the London and housing. His political campaigning -and Tatchell. Although the meeting was secret BermondseyLabour Parties. personal platform has spanned a narrow at the time, the particulars are nQWknown. DUNCAN CAMPBELLreports ON Mt field, from orthodox catholic politics and Mellish threatened that he would resign' Mellish's career. sympathy for the Iberian dictatorships to forthwith if Tatchell were endorsed as can- persistent racialist attitudes-to immigrants didate by the Labour National Executive, HAD HE NOT RESIGNED from the and appeals to free East Enders like and would then campaign against him. Labour Party on Monday, Bob Mellish gangster Charlie Richardson and 'Scarface'. FOQt eventually _agreed to Mellish's de- faced certain expulsion this Friday at the Parsons (a well known robber in the mands leading to. the enormous and hands of West Lewisha:m Labour Party, 1950s). He has been associated; to his em- damaging public row last November. ' where he lives. This was because of his barrassment, .with three corrupt _ busi- Two.
    [Show full text]
  • 39-Summer 2003.Indd
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 39 / Summer 2003 / £7.50 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y A short history of political virginity Chris Radley, with Mark Pack The story of the SDP Original cartoons from the Social Democrat Bill Rodgers Biography: David Owen Stefan Seelbach Aspects of organisational modernisation The case of the SDP Bill Rodgers and Chris Rennard What went wrong at Darlington? 1983 by-election analysed Conrad Russell, Tom McNally, Tim Benson Book reviews Roy Jenkins, Giles Radice, Alan Mumford Liberal Democrat History Group A SHORT HISTORY OF POLITICAL VIRGINITY he Social Democratic Party Chris Radley, book reviews, and New subscription rates for was launched on 26 March a comprehensive bibliography the Journal T1981, and just under seven and chronology for students of Subscription rates for the Journal years later merged with the the SDP. will be increasing from the new Liberals to form today’s Liberal The original cartoon draw- subscription year, starting in Sep- Democrats. ings themselves – including tember 2003. This is the first rise For most of its existence, the many not reproduced in this for four years; it is necessitated by SDP published a regular news- Journal – will be on display the increasing costs of producing paper, the Social Democrat. One at London’s Gallery 33 (near what is on average a much larger of the paper’s regular cartoonists, London Bridge) throughout publication than hitherto. Chris Radley, has kindly made July 2003. Bill Rodgers, one of An annual subscription to the the originals available for repro- the SDP’s founding ‘Gang of Journal of Liberal History will cost duction in this issue of the Journal Four’, will open the exhibition £15.00 (£7.50 unwaged rate) of Liberal History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Left
    THE LABOUR LEFT PATRICK SEYD Ph. D. DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONS SUBMITTED JUNE 1986 THE LABOUR LEFT PATRICK SEYD SUMMARY Throughout its lifetime the Labour Party has experienced ideological divisions resulting in the formation of Left and Right factions. The Labour Left has been the more prominent and persistent of the two factions, intent on defending the Party's socialist principles against the more pragmatic leanings of the Party leadership. During the 1930s and 1950s the Labour Left played a significant, yet increasingly reactive, role within the Party. In the 1970s, however, the Labour Left launched an offensive with a wide-ranging political programme, a set of proposals for an intra-Party transferral of power, and a political leader with exceptional skills. By 1981 this offensive had succeeded in securing the election of a Party Leader whose whole career had been very closely identified with the Labour Left, in achieving a significant shift of power from the parliamentarians to the constituency activists, and in developing a Party programme which incorporated certain major left-wing policies. Success, however, contained the seeds of decline. A split in the parliamentary Party and continual bitter intra-Party factional divisions played a major part in the Party's disastrous electoral performance in the 1983 General Election. The election result gave additional impetus to the Labour Left's fragmentation to the point that it is no longer the cohesive faction it was in previous periods and is now a collection of disparate groups. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Social Science Research Council for its financial aid in the form of a postgraduate research award; Professors Bernard Crick and Royden Harrison for their support and encouragement; and Lewis Minkin for sharing his ideas and encouraging me to complete this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Tony Benn, <I>Against the Tide</I>
    Tony Benn, Against the Tide Caption: On 18 March 1975, the British Government approves, by 16 votes to 7, the outcomes of the renegotiation of the conditions for the United Kingdom's accession to the EEC, by virtue of which, the country decides to remain a member of the common market. In his memoirs, Tony Benn, the then Secretary of State for Industry, recalls the debates within the Government. Source: BENN, Tony. Against the Tide, Diaries 1973-1976. London: Hutchinson, 1989. 754 p. ISBN 0-09-173775-3. p. 342-349. Copyright: (c) Hutchinson URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/tony_benn_against_the_tide-en-d1481ab8-46ee-4c55-b124-c0996f94a6c3.html Last updated: 23/12/2014 1 / 7 23/12/2014 Tony Benn, Against the Tide [...] Tuesday 18 March A momentous day in the history of Britain – the day of the Cabinet decision on Europe, the day of the parliamentary decision, the day of the dissenting Ministers’ declaration, and of the Early Day Motion on the Order Paper. At Cabinet we had before us the papers detailing the renegotiation package, and for the first time the issue of sovereignty was discussed properly. The crucial question was whether the Community was to be a supranational structure or a community of sovereign states. Crosland wasn’t concerned with sovereignty because he thought sovereignty has passed anyway to the power workers and the hospital workers. He was concerned about the host of gratuitous harmonisations which he found he had to deal with. He said he would like this matter put to Ministers to try to stop it.
    [Show full text]
  • Fcrhlislrflav
    l.-4-4; ‘.-‘Li .-.. ” fcrhlislrflav '7August1982 V0143 No-113’, /5"’ __ —__ __ _ __ _ THE first resignation of a real grass-roots mafia and were now standing as ‘In depen- Labour Party Member of Parliament has dents’ — Mellish apparently believing that again brought bubbling to the surface the /75¢’,-14.: V56’? Wrzr me these ex-Labour members would serve tne seething undercurrents within the Labour yaw 5&5? .6’;/r//'1'/PEI’/5/%@, local people, and incidentally, the real Party. Labour party, better than the new boys. Mr Robert Mellish has been a member mmu/ax/na 5/as-115’4../an As it transpired, the Independents of the party since 1927 — 55 years. And --M 04/4 were successful, presumably because they for nearly 37 of those years he has been a DE?/£A0fi/I£A/I had a record of _ work in the local Member of Parliament for a dockiand 50418.0,’ community whereas the new ‘Militant’ constituency in South-East London - candidates did not - tn say nothing of Bermondsey. the campaigns in the media against the A great contribution of service to the Militant Tendency and all its devil work. working class, you might think — if you But Mellish’s support for Independents think that the Labour Party operates in / instead of for the official Labour candi- the interest of the working class, which dates, was enough to get him into consti- we don’t. tutional hot water from which even his In his time Bob Mellish has never friends in Westminster could not save him, achieved highest office in the party but \~\_ é if __4-—-Y- the National Executive Committee now in the various Labour Governments that having to allow a fresh selection confer- __._’_,_.._- have ruled us during the years he has been _.»- —- ence in Bermondsey for their favourite a faithful party hack -— and he did reach candidate in the next General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism and Immigration
    Capitalism and immigration Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist) 274 Moseley Road, Birmingham, B12 0BS www.cpgb-ml.org First published in Britain by H Brar, 2009 Printed in India by Shakun Printers, Shahdara, Delhi-32 Contents Capitalism and immigration 05 Capitalism and migration 06 Europe - a continent of immigrants 09 Reasons for migration 11 Imperialism and immigration 16 Asylum seekers 20 Link between jobs and immigration 23 Divisions within the ruling class 28 Real purpose 37 Method behind madness 48 Electoral advantage 51 Enduring bond between state and unofficial racism 59 Immigration, productivity growth, imports, outsourcing 67 An outmoded system 72 Lenin’s stance 77 Conclusions 82 CPGB-ML congress calls for an end 85 to immigration control Immigration resolution unanimously adopted 91 Capitalism and immigration1 Ours is not the first generation to encounter migration on a vast scale. Two hundred million people, representing three percent of the global population, work outside their countries – double the number of migrants 25 years ago. This new wave of migration (for which there are several reasons to which we shall turn later on), especially that portion coming mainly from the poor coun- tries, inhabited principally by people of dark skin, to rich countries, who principally happen to be inhabited by people of lighter skin, has generated a torrent of anti-immigrant sentiment in the US to a certain extent, but particularly across the countries of west- ern Europe. There is concern of hysteric proportions over asylum seekers in Britain, foreign workers in Germany, immigrants in gen- eral in Austria, etc. The new arrivals are popularly portrayed as welfare scroungers, job snatchers, criminals, drug traffickers and, increasingly, terrorists who present a danger to European culture and stability.
    [Show full text]