GO EAST: UNLOCKING the POTENTIAL of the THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GO EAST: UNLOCKING the POTENTIAL of the THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims GO EAST: UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF THE THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims Published by Centre for London, February 2014 Open Access. Some rights reserved. Centre for London is a politically independent, As the publisher of this work, Centre for London wants to encourage the not-for-profit think tank focused on the big challenges circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. facing London. It aims to help London build on its We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform long history as a centre of economic, social, and or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written intellectual innovation and exchange, and create a permission. This is subject to the terms of the Centre for London licence. fairer, more inclusive and sustainable city. Its interests Its main conditions are: range across economic, environmental, governmental and social issues. · Centre for London and the author(s) are credited Through its research and events, the Centre acts · This summary and the address www.centreforlondon.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full as a critical friend to London’s leaders and policymakers, · The work is not resold promotes a wider understanding of the challenges · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Centre for London. facing London, and develops long-term, rigorous and You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other radical solutions for the capital. It is supported by than those covered by the licence. Centre for London gratefully acknowledges private, voluntary and public sector funders and works the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. collaboratively with its supporters, drawing on their To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org. experience and expertise. Published by: Centre for London 2014 © Centre for London. Some rights reserved. The Exchange 28 London Bridge Street London, SE1 9SG T: 020 3102 3767 [email protected] www.centreforlondon.co.uk Company Number: 8414909 Charity Number: 1151435 Series design by Studio Aparte AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES Andrew Adonis Lord (Andrew) Adonis is an academic, a journalist and a Labour Party peer, who served in the Labour Government from 2005 to 2010. He is currently leading a review of economic growth for the Labour Party. Following his career as an academic at Oxford University, he worked as a journalist at the Financial Times and The Observer, before being appointed by Prime Minister Tony Blair as an advisor at the Number 10 Policy Unit in 1998. Andrew was later promoted to become the Head of the Policy Unit, until being made a life peer in 2005. He was appointed to the Government soon after as Minister for Schools, and later served as Secretary of State for Transport under Gordon Brown. He is Chair of Progress and Chair of Trustees at ippr. Chris Brown Chris is Chief Executive of Igloo Regeneration. He is also a director of: Blueprint (Igloo’s public/private partnership with the Homes and Communities Agency that undertakes sustainable mixed-use regeneration in the East Midlands), The Chrysalis Fund (which lends to employment-generating regeneration projects in the Liverpool City Region) and Carillion Igloo (one of hca and gla’s housing development partners). Tony Burton Tony Burton works for a range of community, planning and environmental projects. He is Executive Chair of Sustainable Homes and a member of the uk Board of the Big Lottery Fund. Tony provides support for community groups on neighbourhood planning and advises hs2 on design and Lafarge Tarmac on sustainability. Tony founded Civic Voice – the national charity for the civic movement – in 2010 and has over twenty five years’ experience on the boards of national charities, including as Director of Strategy and External Affairs at the National Trust and Deputy Director of the Campaign 5 to Protect Rural England. He was a member of Richard Peter Hall Rogers’ Urban Task Force and was recently included Professor Sir Peter Hall is Professor of Planning in Planning’s Top 100 power list. Tony is a geographer, and Regeneration at the Bartlett School of Planning, a town planner and an Honorary Fellow of the Royal University College London, and Senior Research Fellow Institute of British Architects. He was awarded a cbe at the Young Foundation (formerly the Institute of in the Jubilee Honours in 2012. Community Studies), where he served as Director from 2001 to 2004. He was knighted in 1998 for services to Kathleen Dunmore the Town and Country Planning Association, and in Kathleen Dunmore is an economist with over 30 2003 was named by Her Majesty the Queen as a ‘Pioneer years’ experience in housing and construction, and is in the Life of the Nation’ at a reception in Buckingham a Director of Three Dragons, a policy, economics and Palace. In 2003 he received the Gold Medal of the planning consultancy. She worked for many years as Royal Town Planning Institute, the first to be awarded Social Housing Consultant for the House Builders for twenty years. In 2005 he was awarded a Lifetime Federation (1988–2000) and before that for Milton Achievement Award by the Deputy Prime Minister for Keynes Development Corporation and the Building his contributions to urban regeneration and planning. Employers Confederation. From 2000–2004 Kathleen He received the 2005 Balzan Prize for work on the Social was a part time Senior Research Fellow in the Centre and Cultural History of Cities since the Beginning of for Residential Development at Nottingham Trent the 16th Century. In 2008 he received the Sir Patrick University. She was Chair of Midsummer Housing Abercrombie Prize of the International Union of Association from 1994–2000, and is retained as Architects. His latest book Good Cities, Better Lives: housing policy advisor by Retirement Housing Group. How Europe Discovered the Lost Art of Urbanism, was published by Routledge in September 2013. Christopher Hall Chris is a Director in the Planning, Development and David Leam Regeneration Department at gva (Commercial Property David is Executive Director for Infrastructure Policy Advisers). He provides advice relating to planning at London First, a not-for-profit business membership and regeneration, and brings 20 years of experience in organisation. David joined London First in September the uk and North America to his assignments. Chris’s 2010 and has a range of experience in infrastructure and experience includes spatial planning, economic and regulatory policy across a number of sectors. He was a housing strategies, investment frameworks, master- Special Adviser at the Department for Transport (from planning, and stakeholder and community engagement; 2007–2010) and at the Department for Communities as well as delivering large scale regeneration projects and Local Government (2006–07). Prior to this he was through multi-disciplinary teams. He has advised the a civil servant at hm Treasury (from 2003–06) where he Greater London Authority, a range of London Boroughs worked in the Productivity Team and then in Housing and local authorities and private sector organisations and Planning on public spending. David has previously across the wider South East. His work in the Thames worked for the Social Market Foundation think tank Gateway has addressed major Opportunity Areas in and in public affairs. London for the gla, economic growth locations in the Royal Docks, the East London Green Enterprise District Richard Parker and housing and employment delivery in Thurrock. Richard is the Head of pws’s Housing Finance team. 6 7 He advises Governments, local Authorities, Housing authored thought leadership publications and delivered Associations and private companies on strategy and speeches at industry events on the subject. transactions in the Housing sector. He led the firm’s housing policy review – From Decent Homes to Great Ben Rogers Places – and published a paper on us approaches to Ben is the Director of Centre for London. He is a writer Mixed Communities, entitled Investing in Hope. He also and policy thinker, with a particular focus on cities, co-authored the Hard Times papers that pwc published citizenship, social capital, public service reform, and the with l&q on the future of affordable housing in England. built environment. Prior to joining Centre for London, Richard was a member of the Housing Finance Group Ben was an Associate Director of ippr from 2003–2007 set up by the hca in 2009 to assess the impact of the and subsequently led strategy teams in Haringey Council, credit crunch on the uk Housing market and was a dclg and The Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit, where he member of the Mayor of London’s Housing was responsible for producing the cross-government Investment Taskforce. strategy World Class Places. Ben has written several acclaimed books on philosophy and history, published in Heather Pugh the uk and the us, and is an experienced journalist and Heather is a chartered town planner specialising in broadcaster. He is a visiting fellow of the Royal Society strategic planning and implementation. A Planning of Arts, and was a member of the Mayor’s London Partner at David Lock Associates, she has over 20 Finance Commission chaired by Tony Travers. years’ experience in private sector consultancy, with particular expertise in the long term delivery of large- Francis Salway scale development projects throughout the uk. The Francis Salway was Chief Executive of Land Securities, master-planning of sustainable urban extensions is a a ftse 100 company and the largest listed property key element of her consultancy work, working with company in the uk, between 2004 and 2012. During landowners and local authorities to promote sites this period, the company delivered or started £4.8 through the development plan process, secure robust billion of development projects, including £3 billion in planning consents and draw up effective master plans, London.
Recommended publications
  • Tfl RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE and the REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER
    TfL RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE AND THE REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER 1. Overview Building upon previous consultations, Transport for London is presently undertaking a public consultation exercise seeking views upon a revised set of options for new crossings of the River Thames east of Silvertown. (A proposed new tunnel under the Thames linking Silvertown with the North Greenwich peninsular has already attracted support and will be the subject of separate consultation later this year). The four options upon which views are now sought comprise: A new modern ferry at Woolwich A ferry service at Gallions Reach A bridge at Gallions Reach A bridge at Belvedere. The location of these options is shown in Appendix A in a separate document accompanying this one. For each separate proposal, views are invited whether respondents Strongly Support/Support/Neither/ Oppose/ Strongly Oppose. The public consultation deadline is 12th September, but Boroughs have been given until 30th September to respond. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to this consultation, summarise broadly the features of the emerging options and to seek a steer on the stance to be followed in LB Redbridge’s formal reply. 2. Background It is important to be aware of previous formal LB Redbridge positions conveyed to TfL in respect of new river crossings proposals. Those stances are summarised in Appendix B to this paper. The salient context surrounding the options now being considered is summarised below: TfL consultation in recent years has yielded support from a majority of respondents to provision of new Thames crossings, with businesses in east and south-east London very supportive.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan Lane Pier, 1 Swan Lane London Ec4r 3Tn Pdf 6 Mb
    Committee: Date: Planning and Transportation 6 October 2020 Subject: Public Swan Lane Pier 1 Swan Lane London EC4R 3TN Erection of a new pier within the River Thames at Swan Lane, to comprise a refurbished landside access platform; new canting brow and pontoon; dredging and filling of river bed; repair and reinstatement of campshed and riverbank; replacement of mooring pile and installation of additional mooring pile. Ward: Bridge And Bridge Without For Decision Registered No: 19/00116/FULL Registered on: 28 February 2019 Conservation Area: Listed Building: No Summary The application relates to the redevelopment of Swan Lane Pier. The pier is not in use which currently comprises just the dolphins and has been in its current state since 2012 when the regalia boat was removed from the pier. The pier is located and accessed via Swan Lane, which is south of Lower Thames Street. Planning permission is sought for: Erection of a new pier within the River Thames at Swan Lane, to comprise a refurbished landside access platform; new canting brow and pontoon; dredging and filling of river bed; repair and reinstatement of campshed and riverbank; replacement of mooring pile and installation of additional mooring pile. 836 objections have been received from residents and local occupiers regarding the proposed development. The objections have raised concerns regarding the adverse impact on residential amenity, noise and air pollution from the use of the pier from charter vessels, namely the Ocean Diva. Further concerns relate to the emergency and national safety of vessels, antisocial behaviour, visual amenity and protected views, lack of transparency, highway and walkway congestion and that the proposal is contrary to policy.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
    Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • London City Airport Master Plan 2006
    Master Plan November 2006 Master Plan November 2006 At a more local level, the Airport is a force restrictions we impose will continue. Foreword for regeneration which has not only created Alongside this the opening of the extension jobs and prosperity in the immediate area, of the DLR to the Airport in December but has also helped to spearhead the 2005 means we now have significantly success of landmarks like Canary Wharf improved public transport links with a and ExCel London and drive recent and higher proportion of passengers (49%) future extensions to the Docklands Light accessing the Airport by rail than any other Railway (DLR). UK airport. These links will be strengthened further by the operation of Crossrail in the We are also very well placed to continue future, and LCA is a key supporter of this to drive the economic prosperity flowing project. from the London Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012. Through co-operating with a wide variety of interested bodies, we will seek to further But to do all this, we need to grow. In improve our already good environmental 2003 the Government published its Aviation record concentrating on reducing our White Paper which required all UK airports contribution to climate change and man- to set out master plans to grow through to aging all emissions, particularly waste. In 2030 to meet the increase in passenger addition, we support the aviation industry’s demand. One of the key objectives of this inclusion in the EU Emissions Trading paper was to maximise the use of existing Scheme, which will allow the issue of runways and infrastructure to delay, aviation greenhouse gas emissions to be reduce and in some cases eliminate the effectively and responsibly addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Camilla Ween Lessons from London
    Camilla Ween Lessons from London Harvard Loeb Fellow February 2008 1 Developing a World City 2 Better integration of the River Thames 3 Planning for growth 4 Balancing new and old 5 2000 London changed! Greater London Authority Mayor Ken Livingstone 6 Greater London Authority: • Mayor’s Office • Transport for London • London Development Agency • Fire and Emergency Planning • Metropolitan Police 7 What helped change London • Greater London Authority established in 2000 • Spatial Development Strategy - London Plan • Transport for London • Congestion Charge Scheme • Major transport schemes • Role of Land Use Planning • Sustainable travel and ‘soft’ measures 8 Spatial Development Strategy 9 London Plan A coherent set of policies • Climate Change Action Plan • Waste • Noise • Biodiversity • Children’s play space • Flood • Access etc etc 10 11 Transport for London • Overground rail • Underground • Buses • Trams • Taxis • River Services • Cycling • Walking 12 Transport for London • Budget ca $15 Bn • Carries 3 billion passengers pa 13 Transport for London Steady increase in journeys (2007): • Bus up 3.6% • Underground up 4.5% • Docklands Light Rail 16% 14 Transport Strategy 15 Congestion Charge Scheme • First zone introduced 2003 • Area doubled 2007 16 16 Congestion Charging 17 17 Congestion Charge Scheme • Number-plate recognition • Central call-centre billing • Many options for paying: - Buy on the day - Text messaging - Internet 18 Congestion Charging • $16 per day (multiple re-entry) • 7.00 am to 6.00 pm • Monday to Friday • Weekends free 19 Congestion Charging Benefits: • 21 % Traffic reduction • 30% Congestion reduction in first year • 43 % increase in cycling within zone • Reduction in Accidents • Reduction in key traffic pollutants • $250m raised for improving transport 20 Congestion Charging • Public transport accommodating displaced car users • Retail footfall higher than rest of UK • No effect on property prices 21 Major Transport Schemes Being developed: • Crossrail • New tram systems • Major interchanges - e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Lombard Wall, Charlton, London SE7
    COMING SOON – TARGETED OCCUPATION SUMMER 2022 • HIGH SPECIFICATION DETACHED UNIT OF 11,800 SQFT • FULLY FENCED SECURED SITE • MIN 9 M EAVES RISING TO 12M • 24/7/365 ACCESS • ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING POINTS • CENTRAL LONDON – 9 MILES • STRATEGIC LAST MILE LOCATION TO SERVE CENTRAL LONDON • ADJACENT TO THE CHARLTON RIVERSIDE MASTERPLAN • TARGET OCCUPATION Q2 2022 • JUBILEE LINE – 1.2 MILES • CHARLTON STATION – 0.6 MILES HIGH SPEC WAREHOUSE INDUSTRIAL UNIT – 11,800 SQFT - TO LET Grade A Detached Warehouse Industrial Unit - Pre-Let Interest Invited Lombard Wall, Charlton, London SE7 7SH LOCATION Lombard Wall is situated on the northern boundary of the Charlton Riverside Masterplan zone within a protected Strategic Industrial Location. The Masterplan adopted in 2012 will see the transformation of over 100 acres of long established industrial areas with a new mixed use development that will deliver over 8,000 new homes and 5,200 new jobs. The site offers excellent access to both Central London via the A2/A13, and out to the M25 via the A2/A20 as well as benefitting from excellent transport links for staff with the Jubilee Line (Greenwich North Station) 1.2 miles to the west and 18 minutes to Bond Street and Charlton Station to Charing Cross in 35 minutes. The unit is in a perfect location to deliver last mile logistics into the City, North East and South London, from a protected industrial location, and the opportunity to service the future Charlton Masterplan area as it develops out over the next decade. OPPORTUNITY This Grade A unit on Lombard Wall at the heart of Charlton in South East London offers a rare opportunity to secure a long term location with exemplar connectivity, excellent local staff amenities and access to a growing labour pool.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Barrier, Charlton Riverside, SE7 8NQ
    For Sale Development Opportunity Sites B and C, Land South of the Thames Barrier, Charlton Riverside, SE7 8NQ Centrally located within the Thames Barrier Industrial Estate Development opportunity with potential to form part of a wider scheme (subject to gaining the necessary planning consent) Total area of approximately 0.67 ha (1.65 acres): Site B is 0.45 ha (1.11 acres) and Site C is 0.22 ha (0.54 acres) Freehold for sale by informal tender Unconditional offers invited Bid deadline 12 noon Tuesday 26th February Indicative Boundary 08449 02 03 04 gva.co.uk/14803 Location Other local amenities in close proximity to include the Stone Lake Retail Park, a short 10 minute walk away, Sites B and C are located in south east London in which contains a number of national retailers such as Charlton Riverside, which lies circa 0.6 miles to the Halfords, Currys PC World and Harveys. north of Charlton, circa 1.6 miles to the west of Woolwich and approximately 3 miles to the east of The nearby Maryon Park, less than a 10 minute walk Greenwich. away, provides green space for leisure pursuits, two tennis courts, a basketball court and a playground. The sites are centrally located within the Thames Barrier Industrial Estate, which lies adjacent to the Description Thames Barrier site operated by the Environment Agency. The surrounding area predominantly The total area of the two sites measures approximately comprises light industrial buildings, workshops, 1.65 acres (0.67 hectares). Site B is 1.11 acres (0.45 ha) scrapyards, warehouses and waste facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Summary Report
    THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR FROM VISION TO ACTION 1 THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR FROM VISION TO ACTION This report provides a summary of the strategy to unlock and maximise the potential of the Thames Estuary Production Corridor. It marks the culmination of a year-long programme of activity in 2018-2019 which included consultation with over 200 partners and stakeholders and granular research into baseline conditions across the Estuary. This research was undertaken before the COVID-19 pandemic hit the UK and the world, and recognises projected impacts on the South East. Despite the devastating impacts of the pandemic, the cultural and creative industries will be integral to accelerating the UK’s economic and social recovery. Researched and written by Hatch Regeneris, We Made That and In partnership with: Tom Fleming Creative Consultancy. Design by Maddison Graphic. Commissioned by the Greater London Authority and the South East LEP, in partnership with the Royal Docks team and the London Boroughs of Bexley and Lewisham. Published June 2019 Updated July 2020 2 VISION Page 1 WHAT IS THE THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR? Page 5 FOUNDATIONS AND MOMENTUM Page 7 THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GROWTH Page 9 FROM VISION TO ACTION Page 15 WHAT’S NEXT Page 19 3 Royal Opera House, Bob and Tamar Manoukian Production Workshop at High House Production Park, Thurrock Nicholas Hare Architects © Hufton & Crow Photography 4 5 Lewisham: Globally Significant Knowledge, Talent and Research – Goldsmiths, University of London has long anchored creative activity in London, supporting the development of some of the world’s great creative talent. Today, alongside Trinity Laban, the University supports a thriving graduate community as well as high quality research in augmented reality and digital art.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Current and Future Cruise Ship Requirements in London
    London Development Agency June 2009 AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE CRUISE SHIP REQUIREMENTS IN LONDON In conjunction with: 5 Market Yard Mews 194 Bermondsey Street London SE1 3TQ Tel: 020 7642 5111 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Current cruise facilities in central London 4 3. The organisational and planning context 8 4. The cruise market and future demand 11 5. Views of cruise operators 19 6. Potential for growing cruise calls to London 22 7. Assessment of potential sites 24 8. Lessons from elsewhere 37 9. Conclusions 51 Appendices: Appendix 1: List of consultees Appendix 2: Seatrade cruise market report Appendix 3: Location plan of potential sites Appendix 4: Economic impact study Appendix 5: Overview of costs The Tourism Company – Assessment of current and future cruise ship requirements 2 1. INTRODUCTION This report was commissioned by the London Development Agency (LDA) and Greater London Authority (GLA), with support from the Port of London Authority (PLA) in response to a need for a better understanding of London’s future cruise facility requirements. This need is identified in the London Tourism Vision for 2006-2016, and associated Action Plan 2006-2009, under the theme ‘A Sustainable and Inclusive City’, one of whose objectives is to ‘Increase the profile and usage of services along the Thames’. London currently hosts a relatively small number of cruise ships each year, making use of the informal and basic mooring and passenger facilities at Tower Bridge and Greenwich. The aim of this research is to assess the extent to which the lack of a dedicated, more efficient cruise facility is discouraging operators from bringing cruise ships to London, and if there is latent demand, how might this be accommodated.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eliz
    Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 ELIz. 2 CH. 16 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO ROAD TRAFFIC Offences connected with Driving of motor Vehicles Section 1. Causing death by reckless or dangerous driving. 2. Reckless, and dangerous, driving generally. 3. Careless, and inconsiderate, driving. 4. Speeding. 5. Driving under age. 6. Driving, or being in charge, when under influence of drink or drugs. 7. Motor racing on highways. 8. Restriction on carriage of persons on motor cycles. Offences connected with Riding ofpedal Cycles 9. Reckless, and dangerous, cycling. 10. Careless, and inconsiderate, cycling. 11. Cycling when under influence of drink or drugs. 12. Regulation of cycle racing on highways. 13. Restriction on carriage of persons on bicycles. Offences connected with Traffic generally 14. Drivers to comply with traffic directions. 15. Pedestrians to comply with directions to stop given by constables regulating vehicular traffic. 16. Leaving vehicles in dangerous positions. Restrictions on Use of motor Vehicles off Roadway 17. Control of use of footpaths and bridleways for motor vehicle trials. 18. Prohibition of driving motor vehicles elsewhere than on roads. i CH. 16 Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eziz. 2 Speed Limits on restricted Roads Section 19. General speed limit for restricted roads. 20. What roads restricted. 21. Provisions as to directions under sections 19 and 20. 22. Signs for indicating speed restrictions. 23. Provisions supplementary to sections 19 to 22. Speed Limits for certain Classes of Vehicles 24. Speed limits for vehicles of different classes or descriptions. Speed Limits: Exemptions 25. Exemption of fire engines, &c., from speed limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Docklands Revitalisation of the Waterfront
    Docklands Revitalisation of the Waterfront 1. Introduction 2. The beginning of Docklands 2.1. London’s first port 2.2. The medieval port 2.3. London’s Port trough the ages 3. The end of the harbour 4. The Revitalisation 4.1. Development of a new quarter 4.2. New Infrastructure 5. The result 6. Criticism 7. Sources 1. Introduction Docklands is the semi-official name for an area in east London. It is composed of parts of the boroughs of Southwark, Tower Hamlets, Newham and Greenwich. Docklands is named after docks of the London port which had been in this area for centuries. Between 1960 and 1980, all of London's docks were closed, because of the invention of the container system of cargo transportation. For this system the docks were too small. Consequently London had a big area of derelict land which should be used on new way. The solution was to build up a new quarter with flats, offices and shopping malls. Map with 4 the parts of London Docklands and surrounding boroughs (Source: Wikipedia.org) 2. The beginning of Docklands 2.1. London’s first port Within the Roman Empire which stretched from northern Africa to Scotland and from Spain to Turkey, Londinium (London) became an important centre of communication, administration and redistribution. The most goods and people that came to Britain passed through Londinium. Soon this harbour became the busiest place of whole Londinium. On the river a harbour developed were the ships from the west countries and ships from overseas met. 2.2. The medieval port From 1398 the mayor of London was responsible for conserving the river Thames.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Spaces 544
    OPEN SPACES 544 PART II.—MINUTES. 108. Election of Chairman: RESOLVED: That Alderman Collins be elected Chairman of the Sub-Committee for the ensuing Municipal Year. 109. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting of 30th December, 1960, having been circulated, be taken as read and signed as a correct record. 110. Proposed Small Hall: With reference to recommendation 1 of the report of 30th December, 1960, RESOLVED: That the Borough Architect be asked to submit the revised plan showing a proposed small all-purpose hall and single-storey clubroom at West House, as soon as possible. 111. Lettings: RESOLVED: That the Sub-Committee receive a report of the Town Clerk in regard to lettings of accommodation at West House during the period 1st January-31st May, 1963. (The meeting ended at 8.25 p.m.) (Signed) Chairman. HIGHWAYS AND CLEANSING 24th September, 1963. Present: Councillor Mote (in the Chair); Aldermen Bailey, J.P., Gange, J.P., and O'Loughlin, C.C.; Councillors Abbott, Barson, J.P., Campbell, Cock, Cohen, Mrs. Colledge, Harkett, Mines, Joyner, Rees, Stenhouse and Tackley. PART I.—RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATION I: Junction of Kenton Road, Kenton Lane and Wood­ cock Hill: Proposed Improvement and Introduction of "No Waiting" Restrictions. As a result of site meetings at this junction between representatives of the Police, Ministry of Transport, Middlesex County Council, and Harrow and Wembley Borough Councils, it has been suggested that conditions might be improved by certain minor alterations to the layout, principally to reduce the " stagger" between Kenton Lane and Woodcock Hill, by widening the carriageway on the east corner of Woodcock Hill and the west corner of Kenton Lane.
    [Show full text]