GO EAST: UNLOCKING the POTENTIAL of the THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tfl RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE and the REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER
TfL RIVER CROSSINGS CONSULTATION EXERCISE AND THE REDBRIDGE RESPONSE: BRIEFING PAPER 1. Overview Building upon previous consultations, Transport for London is presently undertaking a public consultation exercise seeking views upon a revised set of options for new crossings of the River Thames east of Silvertown. (A proposed new tunnel under the Thames linking Silvertown with the North Greenwich peninsular has already attracted support and will be the subject of separate consultation later this year). The four options upon which views are now sought comprise: A new modern ferry at Woolwich A ferry service at Gallions Reach A bridge at Gallions Reach A bridge at Belvedere. The location of these options is shown in Appendix A in a separate document accompanying this one. For each separate proposal, views are invited whether respondents Strongly Support/Support/Neither/ Oppose/ Strongly Oppose. The public consultation deadline is 12th September, but Boroughs have been given until 30th September to respond. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to this consultation, summarise broadly the features of the emerging options and to seek a steer on the stance to be followed in LB Redbridge’s formal reply. 2. Background It is important to be aware of previous formal LB Redbridge positions conveyed to TfL in respect of new river crossings proposals. Those stances are summarised in Appendix B to this paper. The salient context surrounding the options now being considered is summarised below: TfL consultation in recent years has yielded support from a majority of respondents to provision of new Thames crossings, with businesses in east and south-east London very supportive. -
Swan Lane Pier, 1 Swan Lane London Ec4r 3Tn Pdf 6 Mb
Committee: Date: Planning and Transportation 6 October 2020 Subject: Public Swan Lane Pier 1 Swan Lane London EC4R 3TN Erection of a new pier within the River Thames at Swan Lane, to comprise a refurbished landside access platform; new canting brow and pontoon; dredging and filling of river bed; repair and reinstatement of campshed and riverbank; replacement of mooring pile and installation of additional mooring pile. Ward: Bridge And Bridge Without For Decision Registered No: 19/00116/FULL Registered on: 28 February 2019 Conservation Area: Listed Building: No Summary The application relates to the redevelopment of Swan Lane Pier. The pier is not in use which currently comprises just the dolphins and has been in its current state since 2012 when the regalia boat was removed from the pier. The pier is located and accessed via Swan Lane, which is south of Lower Thames Street. Planning permission is sought for: Erection of a new pier within the River Thames at Swan Lane, to comprise a refurbished landside access platform; new canting brow and pontoon; dredging and filling of river bed; repair and reinstatement of campshed and riverbank; replacement of mooring pile and installation of additional mooring pile. 836 objections have been received from residents and local occupiers regarding the proposed development. The objections have raised concerns regarding the adverse impact on residential amenity, noise and air pollution from the use of the pier from charter vessels, namely the Ocean Diva. Further concerns relate to the emergency and national safety of vessels, antisocial behaviour, visual amenity and protected views, lack of transparency, highway and walkway congestion and that the proposal is contrary to policy. -
'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives. -
London City Airport Master Plan 2006
Master Plan November 2006 Master Plan November 2006 At a more local level, the Airport is a force restrictions we impose will continue. Foreword for regeneration which has not only created Alongside this the opening of the extension jobs and prosperity in the immediate area, of the DLR to the Airport in December but has also helped to spearhead the 2005 means we now have significantly success of landmarks like Canary Wharf improved public transport links with a and ExCel London and drive recent and higher proportion of passengers (49%) future extensions to the Docklands Light accessing the Airport by rail than any other Railway (DLR). UK airport. These links will be strengthened further by the operation of Crossrail in the We are also very well placed to continue future, and LCA is a key supporter of this to drive the economic prosperity flowing project. from the London Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012. Through co-operating with a wide variety of interested bodies, we will seek to further But to do all this, we need to grow. In improve our already good environmental 2003 the Government published its Aviation record concentrating on reducing our White Paper which required all UK airports contribution to climate change and man- to set out master plans to grow through to aging all emissions, particularly waste. In 2030 to meet the increase in passenger addition, we support the aviation industry’s demand. One of the key objectives of this inclusion in the EU Emissions Trading paper was to maximise the use of existing Scheme, which will allow the issue of runways and infrastructure to delay, aviation greenhouse gas emissions to be reduce and in some cases eliminate the effectively and responsibly addressed. -
Camilla Ween Lessons from London
Camilla Ween Lessons from London Harvard Loeb Fellow February 2008 1 Developing a World City 2 Better integration of the River Thames 3 Planning for growth 4 Balancing new and old 5 2000 London changed! Greater London Authority Mayor Ken Livingstone 6 Greater London Authority: • Mayor’s Office • Transport for London • London Development Agency • Fire and Emergency Planning • Metropolitan Police 7 What helped change London • Greater London Authority established in 2000 • Spatial Development Strategy - London Plan • Transport for London • Congestion Charge Scheme • Major transport schemes • Role of Land Use Planning • Sustainable travel and ‘soft’ measures 8 Spatial Development Strategy 9 London Plan A coherent set of policies • Climate Change Action Plan • Waste • Noise • Biodiversity • Children’s play space • Flood • Access etc etc 10 11 Transport for London • Overground rail • Underground • Buses • Trams • Taxis • River Services • Cycling • Walking 12 Transport for London • Budget ca $15 Bn • Carries 3 billion passengers pa 13 Transport for London Steady increase in journeys (2007): • Bus up 3.6% • Underground up 4.5% • Docklands Light Rail 16% 14 Transport Strategy 15 Congestion Charge Scheme • First zone introduced 2003 • Area doubled 2007 16 16 Congestion Charging 17 17 Congestion Charge Scheme • Number-plate recognition • Central call-centre billing • Many options for paying: - Buy on the day - Text messaging - Internet 18 Congestion Charging • $16 per day (multiple re-entry) • 7.00 am to 6.00 pm • Monday to Friday • Weekends free 19 Congestion Charging Benefits: • 21 % Traffic reduction • 30% Congestion reduction in first year • 43 % increase in cycling within zone • Reduction in Accidents • Reduction in key traffic pollutants • $250m raised for improving transport 20 Congestion Charging • Public transport accommodating displaced car users • Retail footfall higher than rest of UK • No effect on property prices 21 Major Transport Schemes Being developed: • Crossrail • New tram systems • Major interchanges - e.g. -
Lombard Wall, Charlton, London SE7
COMING SOON – TARGETED OCCUPATION SUMMER 2022 • HIGH SPECIFICATION DETACHED UNIT OF 11,800 SQFT • FULLY FENCED SECURED SITE • MIN 9 M EAVES RISING TO 12M • 24/7/365 ACCESS • ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING POINTS • CENTRAL LONDON – 9 MILES • STRATEGIC LAST MILE LOCATION TO SERVE CENTRAL LONDON • ADJACENT TO THE CHARLTON RIVERSIDE MASTERPLAN • TARGET OCCUPATION Q2 2022 • JUBILEE LINE – 1.2 MILES • CHARLTON STATION – 0.6 MILES HIGH SPEC WAREHOUSE INDUSTRIAL UNIT – 11,800 SQFT - TO LET Grade A Detached Warehouse Industrial Unit - Pre-Let Interest Invited Lombard Wall, Charlton, London SE7 7SH LOCATION Lombard Wall is situated on the northern boundary of the Charlton Riverside Masterplan zone within a protected Strategic Industrial Location. The Masterplan adopted in 2012 will see the transformation of over 100 acres of long established industrial areas with a new mixed use development that will deliver over 8,000 new homes and 5,200 new jobs. The site offers excellent access to both Central London via the A2/A13, and out to the M25 via the A2/A20 as well as benefitting from excellent transport links for staff with the Jubilee Line (Greenwich North Station) 1.2 miles to the west and 18 minutes to Bond Street and Charlton Station to Charing Cross in 35 minutes. The unit is in a perfect location to deliver last mile logistics into the City, North East and South London, from a protected industrial location, and the opportunity to service the future Charlton Masterplan area as it develops out over the next decade. OPPORTUNITY This Grade A unit on Lombard Wall at the heart of Charlton in South East London offers a rare opportunity to secure a long term location with exemplar connectivity, excellent local staff amenities and access to a growing labour pool. -
Thames Barrier, Charlton Riverside, SE7 8NQ
For Sale Development Opportunity Sites B and C, Land South of the Thames Barrier, Charlton Riverside, SE7 8NQ Centrally located within the Thames Barrier Industrial Estate Development opportunity with potential to form part of a wider scheme (subject to gaining the necessary planning consent) Total area of approximately 0.67 ha (1.65 acres): Site B is 0.45 ha (1.11 acres) and Site C is 0.22 ha (0.54 acres) Freehold for sale by informal tender Unconditional offers invited Bid deadline 12 noon Tuesday 26th February Indicative Boundary 08449 02 03 04 gva.co.uk/14803 Location Other local amenities in close proximity to include the Stone Lake Retail Park, a short 10 minute walk away, Sites B and C are located in south east London in which contains a number of national retailers such as Charlton Riverside, which lies circa 0.6 miles to the Halfords, Currys PC World and Harveys. north of Charlton, circa 1.6 miles to the west of Woolwich and approximately 3 miles to the east of The nearby Maryon Park, less than a 10 minute walk Greenwich. away, provides green space for leisure pursuits, two tennis courts, a basketball court and a playground. The sites are centrally located within the Thames Barrier Industrial Estate, which lies adjacent to the Description Thames Barrier site operated by the Environment Agency. The surrounding area predominantly The total area of the two sites measures approximately comprises light industrial buildings, workshops, 1.65 acres (0.67 hectares). Site B is 1.11 acres (0.45 ha) scrapyards, warehouses and waste facilities. -
Read the Summary Report
THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR FROM VISION TO ACTION 1 THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR FROM VISION TO ACTION This report provides a summary of the strategy to unlock and maximise the potential of the Thames Estuary Production Corridor. It marks the culmination of a year-long programme of activity in 2018-2019 which included consultation with over 200 partners and stakeholders and granular research into baseline conditions across the Estuary. This research was undertaken before the COVID-19 pandemic hit the UK and the world, and recognises projected impacts on the South East. Despite the devastating impacts of the pandemic, the cultural and creative industries will be integral to accelerating the UK’s economic and social recovery. Researched and written by Hatch Regeneris, We Made That and In partnership with: Tom Fleming Creative Consultancy. Design by Maddison Graphic. Commissioned by the Greater London Authority and the South East LEP, in partnership with the Royal Docks team and the London Boroughs of Bexley and Lewisham. Published June 2019 Updated July 2020 2 VISION Page 1 WHAT IS THE THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR? Page 5 FOUNDATIONS AND MOMENTUM Page 7 THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GROWTH Page 9 FROM VISION TO ACTION Page 15 WHAT’S NEXT Page 19 3 Royal Opera House, Bob and Tamar Manoukian Production Workshop at High House Production Park, Thurrock Nicholas Hare Architects © Hufton & Crow Photography 4 5 Lewisham: Globally Significant Knowledge, Talent and Research – Goldsmiths, University of London has long anchored creative activity in London, supporting the development of some of the world’s great creative talent. Today, alongside Trinity Laban, the University supports a thriving graduate community as well as high quality research in augmented reality and digital art. -
Assessment of Current and Future Cruise Ship Requirements in London
London Development Agency June 2009 AN ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT AND FUTURE CRUISE SHIP REQUIREMENTS IN LONDON In conjunction with: 5 Market Yard Mews 194 Bermondsey Street London SE1 3TQ Tel: 020 7642 5111 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Current cruise facilities in central London 4 3. The organisational and planning context 8 4. The cruise market and future demand 11 5. Views of cruise operators 19 6. Potential for growing cruise calls to London 22 7. Assessment of potential sites 24 8. Lessons from elsewhere 37 9. Conclusions 51 Appendices: Appendix 1: List of consultees Appendix 2: Seatrade cruise market report Appendix 3: Location plan of potential sites Appendix 4: Economic impact study Appendix 5: Overview of costs The Tourism Company – Assessment of current and future cruise ship requirements 2 1. INTRODUCTION This report was commissioned by the London Development Agency (LDA) and Greater London Authority (GLA), with support from the Port of London Authority (PLA) in response to a need for a better understanding of London’s future cruise facility requirements. This need is identified in the London Tourism Vision for 2006-2016, and associated Action Plan 2006-2009, under the theme ‘A Sustainable and Inclusive City’, one of whose objectives is to ‘Increase the profile and usage of services along the Thames’. London currently hosts a relatively small number of cruise ships each year, making use of the informal and basic mooring and passenger facilities at Tower Bridge and Greenwich. The aim of this research is to assess the extent to which the lack of a dedicated, more efficient cruise facility is discouraging operators from bringing cruise ships to London, and if there is latent demand, how might this be accommodated. -
Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eliz
Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 ELIz. 2 CH. 16 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO ROAD TRAFFIC Offences connected with Driving of motor Vehicles Section 1. Causing death by reckless or dangerous driving. 2. Reckless, and dangerous, driving generally. 3. Careless, and inconsiderate, driving. 4. Speeding. 5. Driving under age. 6. Driving, or being in charge, when under influence of drink or drugs. 7. Motor racing on highways. 8. Restriction on carriage of persons on motor cycles. Offences connected with Riding ofpedal Cycles 9. Reckless, and dangerous, cycling. 10. Careless, and inconsiderate, cycling. 11. Cycling when under influence of drink or drugs. 12. Regulation of cycle racing on highways. 13. Restriction on carriage of persons on bicycles. Offences connected with Traffic generally 14. Drivers to comply with traffic directions. 15. Pedestrians to comply with directions to stop given by constables regulating vehicular traffic. 16. Leaving vehicles in dangerous positions. Restrictions on Use of motor Vehicles off Roadway 17. Control of use of footpaths and bridleways for motor vehicle trials. 18. Prohibition of driving motor vehicles elsewhere than on roads. i CH. 16 Road Traffic Act, 1960 8 & 9 Eziz. 2 Speed Limits on restricted Roads Section 19. General speed limit for restricted roads. 20. What roads restricted. 21. Provisions as to directions under sections 19 and 20. 22. Signs for indicating speed restrictions. 23. Provisions supplementary to sections 19 to 22. Speed Limits for certain Classes of Vehicles 24. Speed limits for vehicles of different classes or descriptions. Speed Limits: Exemptions 25. Exemption of fire engines, &c., from speed limits. -
Docklands Revitalisation of the Waterfront
Docklands Revitalisation of the Waterfront 1. Introduction 2. The beginning of Docklands 2.1. London’s first port 2.2. The medieval port 2.3. London’s Port trough the ages 3. The end of the harbour 4. The Revitalisation 4.1. Development of a new quarter 4.2. New Infrastructure 5. The result 6. Criticism 7. Sources 1. Introduction Docklands is the semi-official name for an area in east London. It is composed of parts of the boroughs of Southwark, Tower Hamlets, Newham and Greenwich. Docklands is named after docks of the London port which had been in this area for centuries. Between 1960 and 1980, all of London's docks were closed, because of the invention of the container system of cargo transportation. For this system the docks were too small. Consequently London had a big area of derelict land which should be used on new way. The solution was to build up a new quarter with flats, offices and shopping malls. Map with 4 the parts of London Docklands and surrounding boroughs (Source: Wikipedia.org) 2. The beginning of Docklands 2.1. London’s first port Within the Roman Empire which stretched from northern Africa to Scotland and from Spain to Turkey, Londinium (London) became an important centre of communication, administration and redistribution. The most goods and people that came to Britain passed through Londinium. Soon this harbour became the busiest place of whole Londinium. On the river a harbour developed were the ships from the west countries and ships from overseas met. 2.2. The medieval port From 1398 the mayor of London was responsible for conserving the river Thames. -
Open Spaces 544
OPEN SPACES 544 PART II.—MINUTES. 108. Election of Chairman: RESOLVED: That Alderman Collins be elected Chairman of the Sub-Committee for the ensuing Municipal Year. 109. Minutes: RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meeting of 30th December, 1960, having been circulated, be taken as read and signed as a correct record. 110. Proposed Small Hall: With reference to recommendation 1 of the report of 30th December, 1960, RESOLVED: That the Borough Architect be asked to submit the revised plan showing a proposed small all-purpose hall and single-storey clubroom at West House, as soon as possible. 111. Lettings: RESOLVED: That the Sub-Committee receive a report of the Town Clerk in regard to lettings of accommodation at West House during the period 1st January-31st May, 1963. (The meeting ended at 8.25 p.m.) (Signed) Chairman. HIGHWAYS AND CLEANSING 24th September, 1963. Present: Councillor Mote (in the Chair); Aldermen Bailey, J.P., Gange, J.P., and O'Loughlin, C.C.; Councillors Abbott, Barson, J.P., Campbell, Cock, Cohen, Mrs. Colledge, Harkett, Mines, Joyner, Rees, Stenhouse and Tackley. PART I.—RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDATION I: Junction of Kenton Road, Kenton Lane and Wood cock Hill: Proposed Improvement and Introduction of "No Waiting" Restrictions. As a result of site meetings at this junction between representatives of the Police, Ministry of Transport, Middlesex County Council, and Harrow and Wembley Borough Councils, it has been suggested that conditions might be improved by certain minor alterations to the layout, principally to reduce the " stagger" between Kenton Lane and Woodcock Hill, by widening the carriageway on the east corner of Woodcock Hill and the west corner of Kenton Lane.