DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Brochure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Brochure FARADAYWORKS.COM WE NEED YOUR HELP IN DEFINING THE FUTURE OF A PIECE OF CHARLTON RIVERSIDE’S RICH HERITAGE. FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS WE NEED YOUR HELP TO DEFINE AND SHAPE THE FUTURE OF The Wire FARADAY WORKS Workshops The Junction Box The Faraday Works site comprises four historic buildings in the north-eastern 37 Bowater part of the Westminster Industrial Estate Unity House Road in Charlton Riverside. We are making some changes to the planning application submitted at the end of 2019. Over previous public consultation sessions we’ve listened to and learned from your feedback, and we’re once again asking for your input in order to create an exemplar London neighbourhood. This booklet outlines our revised vision for Faraday Works – a heritage-led mixed use scheme that will bring new jobs, shops, homes and public space to Charlton Riverside. COME AND GET IN TOUCH WITH TALK TO US: YOUR FEEDBACK: We will be holding a series of online You can return the survey in and in-person events where you can the Freepost envelope provided meet the team and ask questions. or complete it on our website. Further details, including how Visit: faradayworks.com to register can be found on the Call: 020 3633 6625 back page of this brochure. Email: [email protected] 2 3 Current site plan FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS OUR KEY AMBITIONS Our key principles and aspirations for the previous scheme remain in place, but have been improved and adapted both in line with your feedback and in response to the Grade II listing of 37 Bowater Road in 2020. We agree that Charlton Riverside needs to be truly unique and distinctive, with the site’s heritage being a key component of that identity. FARADAY These revised proposals are being brought forward by landowners Royal London and U+I, with Galliard Homes no longer involved in the scheme. WORKS OUR PRIORITIES ARE T0 An exemplar heritage-led scheme, 1 2 3 featuring new homes, retail and Safeguard the future of all Bring employment back Embrace Bowater Road’s the Listed and locally listed to the site with a diversity new public focus as a key route employment spaces, all wrapped buildings on site including of workspaces, delivering along the Thames Path 37 Bowater Road approximately 800 jobs in beautiful public realm. 4 5 Create a diverse Embed the unique community, with a mix history and character of of different types and the site into its future tenures of homes transformation 4 5 Sketch view of Faraday Works from BarrierPark. FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS HERITAGE Our proposals are inspired by Faraday Works’ rich history – over 150 years of innovation and industry. We’re breathing new life into these iconic, ‘at risk’ buildings, returning the same spirit of enterprise to the site as it saw in its heyday. PRESERVING ALL SENSITIVE INSPIRED BY HERITAGE BUILDINGS RESTORATION RICH HISTORY Restoration of two locally Repurposing of all Exemplary heritage led listed buildings, the Wire buildings on site, giving restoration, and striking Workshops and Junction them a new lease of contemporary additions Box, restoration of Grade II life, full of the spirit link the past to the Listed 37 Bowater Road, of innovation and future on one of the and improvements to the enterprise in most important sites setting of locally listed their heyday. on Charlton Riverside. Unity House. Sketch of the Siemens Brothers Works in 1918-20, with the cable ship Faraday (1) in the foreground. 6 7 Likely by Edmund William Neale, a Siemens employee. FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS 1880s 1881 A SITE STEEPED THE DYNAMIC TRIO LET THERE BE LIGHT IN HISTORY 1863 1874 MADE IN CHARLTON CALLING AMERICA Made in Charlton, Siemens brothers dynamos and high voltage cables helped electricity spread like lightning across London and eventually the entire UK. 1910 The Charlton factory was one of the LONDON CALLING leading manufacturers of arc lamps In 1863 Siemens Brothers boldly launched Siemens Brothers’ factory produced that were soon lighting factories, public one of London’s most innovative factories, thousands of miles of subsea telegraph buildings, streets and city squares. making state-of-the-art cables, before cables to connect the world using their Incandescent bulbs quickly replaced diversifying into telephones, measuring own cable-laying ship, the CS Faraday arc lights, but Siemens Brothers was apparatus, electric lamps and bulbs. – named after William Siemens’ mentor, again at the cutting-edge. Michael Faraday. 1920s 1930 BATTERIES INCLUDED IT’S GOOD TO TALK In 1912, Siemens Brothers’ success was helped by the Uniselector, an electro- mechanical stepping switch that automatically connected calls. It sped up telephone exchanges – but reduced the need for switchboard operators. 1944 1968 Early telephones and other devices Launched in 1930, the Neophone was the needed batteries to work, made right iPhone of its day. Developed by Siemens D-DAY LANDINGS LIFE AFTER SIEMENS Brothers for the Post Office, it was a here in Charlton. Siemens Brothers’ During the Second World War, Siemens In 1968, the board of directors made the big improvement on the “candlestick” batteries were also used for radios and developed a top-secret cable, the ‘HAIS decision to close the Woolwich factory, telephone that could be found in many in cars, which then vied with horses Cable’, for an oil pipeline across the rather than sacrificing any of their other homes and businesses across the country. and carts and electric trolleybuses English Channel to support the Allied factories. This dealt a devastating blow to in the busy London streets. invasion of Normandy in 1944. The the local community as it was the largest project was known as Operation employer in the borough, after the closure PLUTO (Pipe-Lines Under the Ocean). of Woolwich Arsenal a year earlier. 8 9 FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS THOUGHTFUL REDEVELOPMENT IN A CONSERVATION AREA The Faraday Works site comprises four historic buildings in the north-eastern part of the Westminster Industrial Estate in Charlton Riverside. The area was in use as the Siemens Brothers Works until the late 1960’s, and the area to the south and east remains reserved for industrial uses. We are committed to ensuring existing neighbouring businesses can continue to operate unaffected by our proposals. Image of existing buildings on site today A KEY PART OF THE CHARLTON RIVERSIDE OPPORTUNITY AREA Faraday Works sits within the Charlton Riverside Opportunity Area, identified by the Royal Borough of Greenwich and the Greater London Authority as an opportunity area for a significant number of new homes and jobs. The Charlton Riverside Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) gives development guidance for the district, identifying Faraday Works as suitable for employment-led regeneration that can also include new homes. 10 11 FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS WE’VE LISTENED TO YOUR FEEDBACK Our previous proposals were informed and shaped by two rounds of consultation in February and July of 2019, where we received a combined 72% support for regenerating Faraday Works. Subsequently, a planning application was submitted to Royal Borough of Greenwich in December 2019 (Ref: 19/4034/F) but no decision has been made. Shortly after submitting the application, 37 Bowater Road was designated Grade II Listed by Historic England, the only building on site planned for replacement. This means we’re no longer able to proceed with our plans as they stand. We’re bringing forward revised proposals for the site, that retain much of the ambition and ethos of the previous scheme, and centre the restoration of the historic buildings as a key piece of the Faraday Works story. WHAT YOU TOLD US PREVIOUSLY: BROADLY SPEAKING, ARE YOU 33% SUPPORT SUPPORTIVE OF THE PLANS TO REDEVELOP FARADAY WORKS? (COMBINED FEBRUARY AND JULY 2019 FEEDBACK) 10% We’ve the utmost respect 40% NEITHER SUPPORT STRONGLY NOR OPPOSE WHAT PEOPLE SUPPORTED SUPPORT for Charlton’s history, for the – Regenerating this largely derelict site – Restoration of heritage buildings 9% OPPOSE neighbouring businesses, for – Employment focus – Affordable housing 9% – Design approach combining heritage STRONGLY OPPOSE the masterplan and residents and contemporary architecture – everything we do is based on WHERE THERE WERE CONCERNS – Loss of 37 Bowater Road in the listening to and learning from you. previous plans – Building heights over ten storeys 12 13 FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS PLACE Faraday Works will be a genuinely mixed-use community that returns life and industry to these buildings. A place where locals and visitors alike can benefit from shops, amenities, employment spaces and new homes, all wrapped in beautiful public realm. View of Bowater Road from December 2019 planning application showing the Wire Workshops (right) and Junction 15 Box (left). This element of the scheme 14 15 remains broadly unchanged. FARADAY FARADAY WORKS WORKS Unity House The Junction Box Faraday Building Bowater Building 37 Bowater Road A CONSIDERED 10 Eastmoor Workshops 8 DESIGN 1 8 NARRATIVE 5 10 2 3 8 OVERVIEW OF KEY DESIGN MOVES: The Wire Workshops 2 1 3 RETAIN AND IMPROVING CREATE CONVERT EXISTING PERMEABILITY AND FOCAL BUILDINGS CONNECTIONS POINTS The buildings are on A new north-south route will be We will create focal points the ‘heritage at risk’ register, opened up with access through for community uses off and without urgent work will the base of 37 Bowater Road, Faraday Way, around Unity deteriorate. We will retain allowing access to neighbours House and the existing cafe. and sensitively convert all the and for Bowater Road to New industrial uses will be Retained/Refurbished Existing Buildings buildings on site, reusing as become a pedestrian and cycle adjacent to the wider industrial much of the structure and priority street. This will create estate, and workspaces will line Proposed Extensions circulation as possible, and well-proportioned streets Bowater Road.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Ungovernable'? Financialisation and the Governance Of
    Governing the ‘ungovernable’? Financialisation and the governance of transport infrastructure in the London ‘global city-region’ February 2018 Peter O’Briena* Andy Pikea and John Tomaneyb aCentre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (CURDS), Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK NE1 7RU. Email: peter.o’[email protected]; [email protected] bBartlett School of Planning, University College London, Bartlett School of Planning, University College London, 620 Central House, 14 Upper Woburn Place, London, UK WC1H 0NN. Email: [email protected] *Corresponding author 1 Abstract The governance of infrastructure funding and financing at the city-region scale is a critical aspect of the continued search for mechanisms to channel investment into the urban landscape. In the context of the global financial crisis, austerity and uneven growth, national, sub-national and local state actors are being compelled to adopt the increasingly speculative activities of urban entrepreneurialism to attract new capital, develop ‘innovative’ financial instruments and models, and establish new or reform existing institutional arrangements for urban infrastructure governance. Amidst concerns about the claimed ‘ungovernability’ of ‘global’ cities and city-regions, governing urban infrastructure funding and financing has become an acute issue. Infrastructure renewal and development are interpreted as integral to urban growth, especially to underpin the size and scale of large cities and their significant contributions within national economies. Yet, oovercoming fragmented local jurisdictions to improve the governance and economic, social and environmental development of major metropolitan areas remains a challenge. The complex, and sometimes conflicting and contested inter-relationships at stake raise important questions about the role of the state in wrestling with entrepreneurial and managerialist governance imperatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Lombard Wall, Charlton, London SE7
    COMING SOON – TARGETED OCCUPATION SUMMER 2022 • HIGH SPECIFICATION DETACHED UNIT OF 11,800 SQFT • FULLY FENCED SECURED SITE • MIN 9 M EAVES RISING TO 12M • 24/7/365 ACCESS • ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING POINTS • CENTRAL LONDON – 9 MILES • STRATEGIC LAST MILE LOCATION TO SERVE CENTRAL LONDON • ADJACENT TO THE CHARLTON RIVERSIDE MASTERPLAN • TARGET OCCUPATION Q2 2022 • JUBILEE LINE – 1.2 MILES • CHARLTON STATION – 0.6 MILES HIGH SPEC WAREHOUSE INDUSTRIAL UNIT – 11,800 SQFT - TO LET Grade A Detached Warehouse Industrial Unit - Pre-Let Interest Invited Lombard Wall, Charlton, London SE7 7SH LOCATION Lombard Wall is situated on the northern boundary of the Charlton Riverside Masterplan zone within a protected Strategic Industrial Location. The Masterplan adopted in 2012 will see the transformation of over 100 acres of long established industrial areas with a new mixed use development that will deliver over 8,000 new homes and 5,200 new jobs. The site offers excellent access to both Central London via the A2/A13, and out to the M25 via the A2/A20 as well as benefitting from excellent transport links for staff with the Jubilee Line (Greenwich North Station) 1.2 miles to the west and 18 minutes to Bond Street and Charlton Station to Charing Cross in 35 minutes. The unit is in a perfect location to deliver last mile logistics into the City, North East and South London, from a protected industrial location, and the opportunity to service the future Charlton Masterplan area as it develops out over the next decade. OPPORTUNITY This Grade A unit on Lombard Wall at the heart of Charlton in South East London offers a rare opportunity to secure a long term location with exemplar connectivity, excellent local staff amenities and access to a growing labour pool.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Barrier, Charlton Riverside, SE7 8NQ
    For Sale Development Opportunity Sites B and C, Land South of the Thames Barrier, Charlton Riverside, SE7 8NQ Centrally located within the Thames Barrier Industrial Estate Development opportunity with potential to form part of a wider scheme (subject to gaining the necessary planning consent) Total area of approximately 0.67 ha (1.65 acres): Site B is 0.45 ha (1.11 acres) and Site C is 0.22 ha (0.54 acres) Freehold for sale by informal tender Unconditional offers invited Bid deadline 12 noon Tuesday 26th February Indicative Boundary 08449 02 03 04 gva.co.uk/14803 Location Other local amenities in close proximity to include the Stone Lake Retail Park, a short 10 minute walk away, Sites B and C are located in south east London in which contains a number of national retailers such as Charlton Riverside, which lies circa 0.6 miles to the Halfords, Currys PC World and Harveys. north of Charlton, circa 1.6 miles to the west of Woolwich and approximately 3 miles to the east of The nearby Maryon Park, less than a 10 minute walk Greenwich. away, provides green space for leisure pursuits, two tennis courts, a basketball court and a playground. The sites are centrally located within the Thames Barrier Industrial Estate, which lies adjacent to the Description Thames Barrier site operated by the Environment Agency. The surrounding area predominantly The total area of the two sites measures approximately comprises light industrial buildings, workshops, 1.65 acres (0.67 hectares). Site B is 1.11 acres (0.45 ha) scrapyards, warehouses and waste facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Summary Report
    THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR FROM VISION TO ACTION 1 THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR FROM VISION TO ACTION This report provides a summary of the strategy to unlock and maximise the potential of the Thames Estuary Production Corridor. It marks the culmination of a year-long programme of activity in 2018-2019 which included consultation with over 200 partners and stakeholders and granular research into baseline conditions across the Estuary. This research was undertaken before the COVID-19 pandemic hit the UK and the world, and recognises projected impacts on the South East. Despite the devastating impacts of the pandemic, the cultural and creative industries will be integral to accelerating the UK’s economic and social recovery. Researched and written by Hatch Regeneris, We Made That and In partnership with: Tom Fleming Creative Consultancy. Design by Maddison Graphic. Commissioned by the Greater London Authority and the South East LEP, in partnership with the Royal Docks team and the London Boroughs of Bexley and Lewisham. Published June 2019 Updated July 2020 2 VISION Page 1 WHAT IS THE THAMES ESTUARY PRODUCTION CORRIDOR? Page 5 FOUNDATIONS AND MOMENTUM Page 7 THE OPPORTUNITY FOR GROWTH Page 9 FROM VISION TO ACTION Page 15 WHAT’S NEXT Page 19 3 Royal Opera House, Bob and Tamar Manoukian Production Workshop at High House Production Park, Thurrock Nicholas Hare Architects © Hufton & Crow Photography 4 5 Lewisham: Globally Significant Knowledge, Talent and Research – Goldsmiths, University of London has long anchored creative activity in London, supporting the development of some of the world’s great creative talent. Today, alongside Trinity Laban, the University supports a thriving graduate community as well as high quality research in augmented reality and digital art.
    [Show full text]
  • Charlton Riverside SPD
    Charlton Riverside SPD Draft February 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Vision and Objectives 2 3 Context 13 4 Development Concept 29 5 Theme 1 – A Residentially Diverse Charlton Riverside 41 6 Theme 2 – An Economically Active Charlton Riverside 49 7 Theme 3 – A Connected and Accessible Charlton Riverside 61 8 Theme 4 – An Integrated and Lifetime Ready Charlton Riverside 73 Draft9 Theme 5 – A Well-designed Charlton Riverside 87 10 Theme 6 – A Sustainable and Resilient Charlton Riverside 113 11 Theme 7 – A Viable and Deliverable Charlton Riverside 121 12 Illustrative Masterplan 135 Appendices Charlton Riverside SPD | February 2017 iii List of Figures Figure Page Figure Page Figure Page 1.1 SPD Area 3 5.4 Development densities 47 8.7 Green Bridge Option 1 83 1.2 Basis of this SPD and how it should be used 5 6.1 Existing land use (at ground floor) 50 8.8 Green Bridge Option 2 84 3.1 The City in the East 14 6.2 Economic activity at Charlton Riverside 52 8.9 Green Crossing 85 3.2 Charlton Riverside 15 6.3 Angerstein and Murphy’s Wharves 53 9.1 Character areas 88 3.3 Economic activity at Charlton Riverside 17 6.4 Riverside Wharf 54 9.2 Neighbourhood and local centres 91 3.4 Existing building heights 18 6.5 Proposed ground floor uses 55 9.3 Neighbourhood Centre/High Street 92 3.5 Flood risk 20 6.6 Proposed upper floor uses 56 9.4 Retail and commercial uses 93 3.6 Public Transport Accessibility Level (PTAL) 21 6.7 Employment locations 57 9.5 Historic assets map 95 3.7 Existing open space 22 7.1 Proposed network of streets 62 9.6 Block structure
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Transport and Development in the Thames Gateway
    Relationship between transport and development in the Thames Gateway Contents Front cover......................................................................................................................2 Strategic overview and summary..................................................................................3 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................8 2. The scope of the Thames Gateway in 2003 ............................................................11 3. Transport analysis....................................................................................................30 4. Potential scale of development ................................................................................34 5. Transport and development interaction ................................................................48 6. Strategic focus in the Thames Gateway .................................................................62 7. Phasing of transport and development...................................................................66 8. Conclusions ...............................................................................................................69 9. Appendix A: Travel characteristics and capacities...............................................72 10. Appendix B: Planning aspiration forecasts for SE sub areas ............................86 11. Appendix C: Examples from the Netherlands.....................................................89 12. Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • We're CCRA – and We Never Give
    We’re CCRA – and we never give up! e frst featured our concerns about the trafc g replacing the single yellow line outside the post ofce lights at the bottom of Charlton Church Lane 18 with a double yellow line; Wmonths ago and are grateful to a CCRA mem- g removing a redundant stop line. ber for conducting trafc surveys demonstrating the trafc We are grateful to Andy Barker and Alex Djan (RBG’s control measures’ failings. Following this we met RBG Trafc Trafc Group Manager) for their hard work on our behalf Group representatives to discuss the situation. Council ofc- and look forward to hearing more from Alex as the scheme ers agreed the trafc light phasing is poor, leading to unnec- progresses. essary trafc jams and bus delays, particularly in peak hours, but they strongly indicated that little could be done without Silvertown Tunnel decision delayed again funding. The decision on whether to build the Silvertown Tunnel We continued to press for action and in October 2017, has been delayed again, this time until May 2018, to allow ofcers outlined some ideas they hope to take forward issues about air quality to be considered further. with TfL to improve the interchange. They indicated that We think this gives London mayor Sadiq Khan and his funding is available that would include: ways to improve deputy mayor for transport, Val Shawcross, the ideal trafc fow, provide safer crossings for pedestrians and stop chance to show leadership and cancel a scheme which inconsiderate parking. While discussions are on-going and threatens to increase pollution and congestion across large fnal approval still needs to be agreed, RBG are currently areas of south-east and east London.
    [Show full text]
  • East London River Crossings: Assessment of Options
    TRANSPORT FOR LONDON RIVER CROSSINGS: SILVERTOWN TUNNEL SUPPORTING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION This report is part of a wider EAST LONDON RIVER suite of documents which CROSSINGS: outline our approach to traffic, environmental, optioneering ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS and engineering disciplines, amongst others. We would Transport for London like to know if you have any December 2012 comments on our approach to this work. To give us your This report focuses on the proposals for views, please respond to our river crossings, namely the progression consultation at of new crossing infrastructure for road www.tfl.gov.uk/silvertown- traffic between east and south east tunnel London, in the form of fixed links (bridges or tunnels), or vehicle ferries. Please note that consultation on the Silvertown Tunnel is running from October – December 2014 East London River Crossings: Assessment of Options Date: December 2012 1 TfL Planning River crossings: Assessment of options Review of River Crossings: report series A. Assessment of need B. Assessment of options this report 2 TfL Planning River crossings: Assessment of options CONTENTS 1. Strategic context ............................................................................................................. 4 2. Assessing river crossing options ..................................................................................... 9 3. Do nothing (Option A) .................................................................................................... 16 4. Demand management and maximising public transport
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2020 Public Consultation Draft January 2021
    www.bexley.gov.uk Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2020 Public consultation draft January 2021 Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2020 (Draft for Consultation) Contents 1. Overview ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2: Transport ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Rail ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Bus Transit and other Local Public Transport ............................................................................................................ 12 Roads, Streets and Liveable Neighbourhoods ........................................................................................................... 13 Local Connections ................................................................................................................................................................ 16 River crossings and river services .................................................................................................................................. 18 Electric Vehicle Charging .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Electoral Arrangements for Royal Borough of Greenwich Council
    New electoral arrangements for Royal Borough of Greenwich Council Draft Recommendations March 2021 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2021 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why Greenwich? 2 Our proposals for Greenwich 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2 Have your say
    [Show full text]
  • GO EAST: UNLOCKING the POTENTIAL of the THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims
    GO EAST: UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL OF THE THAMES ESTUARY Andrew Adonis, Ben Rogers and Sam Sims Published by Centre for London, February 2014 Open Access. Some rights reserved. Centre for London is a politically independent, As the publisher of this work, Centre for London wants to encourage the not-for-profit think tank focused on the big challenges circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. facing London. It aims to help London build on its We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform long history as a centre of economic, social, and or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written intellectual innovation and exchange, and create a permission. This is subject to the terms of the Centre for London licence. fairer, more inclusive and sustainable city. Its interests Its main conditions are: range across economic, environmental, governmental and social issues. · Centre for London and the author(s) are credited Through its research and events, the Centre acts · This summary and the address www.centreforlondon.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full as a critical friend to London’s leaders and policymakers, · The work is not resold promotes a wider understanding of the challenges · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Centre for London. facing London, and develops long-term, rigorous and You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other radical solutions for the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Borough of Greenwich Local Plan
    Royal Borough of Greenwich Local Plan Site Allocations Proposed Submission Regulation 19 Consultation February 2021 How to Respond Site Allocations Local Plan Proposed Submission From (dates to be added), we are inviting comments on the Site Allocations Proposed Submission Local Plan. Responses can be submitted as follows: • Online survey: www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk/haveyoursay • By email: [email protected] • By post: Royal Borough of Greenwich, Planning Policy Team, 5th Floor, The Woolwich Centre, 35 Wellington Street, Woolwich, London, SE18 6HQ We are keen to hear your views on the proposed allocations. Respondents can submit their views via the online survey (link above) or by submitting written responses. This document is available to view at all Royal Greenwich’s libraries and through the reception area at The Woolwich Centre, 35 Wellington Street. We will take all views into account and a summary of the comments received will be made public. If you’d like to be kept informed of the process, please provide your contact details and you’ll be added to the Planning Policy Consultation Database. Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 The Preferred Approach Document ................................................................. 1 Policy Context ...................................................................................................... 2 Integrated Impact Assessment .........................................................................
    [Show full text]