DOCSLIB.ORG

Jekaterina Dorodnova

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jekaterina Dorodnova Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg Wolfgang Zellner/Randolf Oberschmidt/Claus Neukirch/Katri Kemppainen (Eds.) Comparative Case Studies on the Effectiveness of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities Jekaterina Dorodnova Challenging Ethnic Democracy: Implementation of the Recommendations of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minori- ties to Latvia, 1993-2001 Working Paper 10 Wolfgang Zellner/Randolf Oberschmidt/Claus Neukirch/Katri Tuulia Kemppainen (Eds.) Comparative Case Studies on the Effectiveness of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities Jekaterina Dorodnova Challenging Ethnic Democracy: Implementation of the Recommendations of the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities to Latvia, 1993-2001 CORE Working Paper 9 Hamburg 2003 2 Contents List of Abbreviations 7 Editor´s Preface 8 Preface and Acknowledgements 9 Chapter 1. Historical and Political Background of the HCNM’s Involvement 13 1.1 Independence and Annexation 13 1.2 The Post-Stalin Era 15 1.3 Language and Education in Soviet Latvia 16 1.4 The Independence Movement 17 1.5 The Post-Independence Political Context in Latvia 19 1.6 The Identity of Russian-speakers in Latvia 22 1.7 Latvian-Russian Interstate Relations 23 Chapter 2. The Adoption of the Latvian Citizenship Law, 1993-1994 25 2.1 Background to the Latvian Citizenship Law 25 2.1.1 The Inter-war Period 25 2.1.2 The Modern Citizenship Debate, 1980s – 1990s 26 2.1.3 The Draft Citizenship Law, 1989 26 2.1.4 The Draft Citizenship Law, 1991 27 2.1.5 The Supreme Council Resolution of October 15, 1991 27 2.1.6 Reactions to the Resolution of October 15, 1991 28 2.2. The Adoption Process of the Citizenship Law and the HCNM’s Involvement 29 2.2.1 The HCNM’s Initial Involvement in Latvia, 1993 29 2.2.2 The Media’s Treatment of the HCNM’s Initial Involvement in Latvia 31 2.2.3 The High Commissioner’s Position regarding the Legal Continuity Approach, 1991-1993 31 2.2.4 Debating the Citizenship Law in the Fifth Saeima: A General Overview, 1993- 1994 32 2.2.5 The HCNM’s and the CoE’s Joint Involvement in the Drafting of the Citizenship Law 33 2.2.6 The Passing of the Draft Citizenship Law on June 21, 1994 34 2.2.7 President Ulmanis’s Veto 34 2.2.8 The Repeated Consideration of the Citizenship Law 35 2.2.9 Assessment 35 2.3 Specific Recommendations of the High Commissioner Regarding the Quota Sys- tem for Naturalisation and the Saeima’s Response, 1993-1994 36 2.3.1 The "Radical" and the "Liberal" Approaches to Quotas 36 2.3.2 Naturalisation Quotas in the draft Citizenship Law 37 2.3.3 The HCNM’s Recommendations on the Draft Law 37 2.3.4 Reactions to the High Commissioner’s Recommendations 38 2.3.5 The Reconsideration of the Citizenship Law and Article 14 39 3 2.3.6 Reactions to the Adoption of the Citizenship Law 41 Chapter 3. Abolishing the "Windows" System 43 3.1 The Problem of Naturalisation, 1995-1997 43 3.1.1 Stagnation of the Naturalisation Process and the Coalition Agreement 43 3.1.2 Reasons for the Slow Naturalisation Pace 44 3.1.3 The HCNM’s Recommendation to Abolish the "Windows" System in the 1996- 1997 Latvian Political Context 45 3.2 Revived Debate on the "Windows" System, 1997-1998 47 3.2.1 A Season for Extremism 47 3.2.2 The Crisis of March-April 1998 48 3.2.3 International Response to the Conflict 49 3.2.4 Reactions to the HCNM’s Recommendation on Abolishing the "Windows" 50 3.3 The Process of Amending the Citizenship Law, 1998 51 3.3.1 The Request for a National Referendum 52 3.3.2 Support for the HCNM’s Recommendations on the Citizenship Law 52 3.3.3 The Success of the Referendum Initiative 53 3.3.4 The Result of the National Referendum 54 3.3.5 Assessment of the Influence of the High Commissioner on the Political Process 54 Chapter 4. The Issue of Stateless Children Born in Latvia 57 4.1 Background 57 4.1.1 Compliance with Article 24, Paragraph 3, of the International Covenant On Civil And Political Rights, 1993-1994 57 4.1.2 Compliance with Article 7, Paragraph 1, of The Convention On The Reduction of Statelessness 59 4.2 Recommendations Concerning the Granting of Citizenship to Children Born in Latvia to Stateless Persons or Non-Citizens, 1997-1998 60 4.2.1 The 1998 Negotiations over the Provision on Stateless Children 62 4.2.2 Adoption of the Provision on Stateless Children 65 4.3 Summary and Conclusions 66 Chapter 5. Naturalisation Procedures 71 5.1. The Term of Residence Required for Naturalisation 71 5.2 Restrictions from Naturalisation by a Court Degree 72 5.3 The Budget of the Naturalisation Board 74 5.4 The State Fee for Naturalisation 75 5.5 The Requirement to Have a Legal Source of Income 77 5.6 The Waiting Period for Naturalisation and the Appeals Procedure 78 5.7 Granting Citizenship for Outstanding Accomplishments 80 5.8 Language Requirements for Naturalisation 81 5.8.1 Language Knowledge and Exemptions from the Language Test, 1993-1994 81 5.8.2 The 1995 Amendments 83 4 5.8.3 The Issue of Exempting the Elderly and the Disabled from the Language Test Back on the Agenda, 1996-1998 83 5.8.4 Lowering the General Language Requirements, 1996-1998 85 5.8.5 Summary and Assessment 87 5.9 The Test of Latvian History and Constitution 88 5.9.1 Recommendations on the Test of the Latvian History and Constitution 90 5.9.2 Assessment 92 5.10 Public Information on Naturalisation 93 Chapter 6 . The Law on the State Language 96 6.1 Background 96 6.2 Language Examinations 97 6.3 Language and Schools 98 6.4 The State Language Inspectorate 99 6.5 The Adoption Process of the New State Language Law, 1994-1999 100 6.5.1 The Second Reading of the Draft Law, March 1998 100 6.5.2 The High Commissioner’s Involvement, March-April 1998 101 6.5.3 The Second Reading of the Draft Law, April 1998 and the HCNM, August– September 1998 102 6.5.4 The Third Reading of the Draft Law, September-October 1998 102 6.5.5 The Draft Law in the Seventh Saeima and the HCNM 103 6.5.6 The Second Reading of the Draft Law in the Seventh Saeima, March 1999 103 6.5.7 The High Commissioner’s Involvement, March-July 1999 104 6.5.8 The Third Reading of the State Language Law, July 8, 1999 106 6.6 Reactions to the Adoption of the Law 106 6.6.1 The High Commissioner’s Reaction and the President’s Veto 107 6.6.2 The State Language Law in the Context of EU Accession 107 6.7 The Cabinet of Ministers’ Language Regulations and International Involvement 108 6.8 Specific Recommendations Made by the High Commissioner on the State Lan- guage Law 110 6.8.1 The General Scope of Language Regulation in the Private Sphere and the "Legiti- mate Public Interest" Clause 111 6.8.2 Language Proficiency Degrees 113 6.8.3 The Language of Addressing Public and Private Authorities 115 6.8.4 The Use of Language in Personal Names 116 6.9 Use of Language in Education 118 6.10 Other Recommendations Made by the HCNM to the Draft Law on the State Lan- guage 120 6.10.1 Record-Keeping (Article 8) 121 6.10.2 Stamps, Seals and Letterheads (Article 20) 121 6.10.3 Names of Institutions, Enterprises and Organisations (Article 18) 121 6.10.4 Place Names (Article 18) 122 6.10.5 Formal Meetings (Article 7) 122 6.10.6 Broadcasting and Films (Article 17) 122 6.10.7 Public Information (Article 21) 122 6.10.8 Public Events (Article 11) 123 6.11 Language Training 125 6.12 Assessment 127 5 Chapter 7. Integration, the Minority Ombudsman and the Ethnicity Entry 129 7.1 The Integration Programme 129 7.2 Subsequent Integration-related Developments 130 7.3 The Idea of a National Commissioner on Ethnic and Language Questions 131 7.4 The Latvian National Human Rights Office 131 7.5 The Ethnicity Entry in Passports 133 Chapter 8. Conclusion - Challenging Ethnic Democracy: An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the HCNM in Latvia, 1993-2001 135 8.1 Operational, Normative and Substantive Effectiveness 136 8.1.1 Operational Effectiveness of the High Commissioner - the HCNM’s Recommendations and Latvia’s Foreign Policy Priorities - Distribution of Involvement - Fostering Dialogue 136 8.1.2 Normative Effectiveness of the High Commissioner 141 8.1.3 Substantive Effectiveness of the High Commissioner 146 8.2 Overall Assessment 150 List of References 153 Bibliography 160 6 List of Abbreviations International CBSS Council of Baltic Sea States CoE Council of Europe CSCE Conference for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) CSO Committee of Senior Officials (OSCE) EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECMI European Centre for Minority Issues ECHR European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms EU European Union FCPNM Framework Convention on the Protection of National Minorities FIER Foundation on Inter-Ethnic Relations HCNM High Commissioner on National Minorities (OSCE) ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights IFSH Institut für Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik Hamburg NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NGO Non-governmental Organization ODIHR Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE) OSCE Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe PHARE Poland and Hungary Action for the Reconstruction of the Economy (EU) RFE/RL Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty SSR Soviet Socialist Republic UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme US United States USA United States of America USD United States Dollar USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics WWII World War Two Republic of Latvia FHRUL For Human Rights in the United Latvia LNHRO Latvian National Human Rights Office LVL Latvijas lats [Latvian Lat] MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MK Ministru Kabinets (Cabinet of Ministers) MNIL Movement for the National Independence of Latvia MP Member of Parliament NPLLT National Programme for Latvian Language Training RL Republic of Latvia SIF Society Integration Foundation 7 Editor´s Preface With the present series "Comparative Case Studies on the Effectiveness of the OSCE High Com- missioner on National Minorities," we are publishing the results of five country studies on Estonia, Latvia, Ukraine, Macedonia and Romania of the project "On the Effectiveness of the OSCE Minor- ity Regime.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EU Enlargement and Latvian Citizenship Policy
    EU Enlargement and Latvian Citizenship Policy HELEN M. MORRIS Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium Issue 1/2003 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbrücke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de EU Enlargement and Latvian Citizenship Policy HELEN M. MORRIS Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium This article examines whether its the desire to join the European Union exerted any influence upon Latvian nationality policy. The author concludes that external pressure upon Latvian policymakers during the accession process led to a significantly more liberal and inclusive citizenship law than might have otherwise been adopted. The analysis includes an assessment of current concerns in nationality and minority policy in Latvia including the large number and status of non-citizens, the application of language legislation, and the reform of the education system. EU membership is expected to make Latvian citizenship more attractive for non-citizens and the country will continue to be required to meet its international obligations regarding treatment of the non-citizen population and minorities. However, there is a risk that the completion of accession negotiations and accompanying reduction in European Commission influence coupled with intense pressure on limited economic and administrative resources in the new member states will sideline respect for and protection of minority rights. I. Introduction Since regaining independence in 1991, Latvian nationality policy has developed from an exclusive, almost restitutionist, policy seeking to identify the Latvian state with the Latvian nation into a more inclusive civic definition of Latvian citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Helsinki Summit, July 20–August 8, 1975
    1370_A62-A65.qxd 12/7/07 8:16 AM Page 921 320-672/B428-S/40001 Helsinki Summit, July 20–August 8, 1975 319. Editorial Note Throughout July 1975, President Ford and Secretary of State Kiss- inger discussed preparations for the President’s trip to Helsinki for the final stage of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, which would include meetings with individual European leaders in Helsinki and stops in Europe before and after the conference. During their conversations, the issue arose of whether Ford should meet with Soviet dissident writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn, whom the Soviets had permitted to emigrate to the United States, before the Helsinki conference. Kissinger wrote in his memoirs: “Solzhenitsyn was expelled from the Soviet Union on February 13, 1974, and came to the United States some months later. The AFL–CIO, under the leader- ship of its strongly anti-Communist president, George Meany, invited him to address a dinner in Washington on June 30, 1975, not long be- fore Ford’s departure to sign the Final Act of the European Security Conference. The date had been carefully chosen; if Solzhenitsyn ex- pressed anything like his well-known views, he would supply plenty of material for the opponents of CSCE. Solzhenitsyn did not disappoint his sponsors. [. .] Solzhenitsyn urged the United States to lead a cru- sade against Communism even inside the Soviet Union and disdained the argument that such a course represented interference in Soviet do- mestic affairs: ‘Interfere more and more,’ Solzhenitsyn implored. ‘In- terfere as much as you can. We beg you to come and interfere.’ [.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker of the Saeima, Two Deputy Speakers, a Secretary and a Deputy Secretary
    The Presidium of the Saeima The work of the Saeima is managed by the Presidium, which is elected by the Saeima at the beginning of its term of office. The Presidium of the Saeima consists of five members of the Saeima – the Speaker of the Saeima, two Deputy Speakers, a Secretary and a Deputy Secretary. Nominations for the positions in the Saeima Presidium are submitted by Saeima members in writing, and voting on the nominees for each position is held simultaneously by secret ballot and by using ballot papers. The nominee who receives the most votes is deemed elected; however, the number of votes should not be less than the absolute majority of votes of the members present. Members of the Presidium are usually elected from the ru- ling parties represented in the Saeima; however, the Speaker In order to coordinate the activities of parliamentary of the Saeima may also be elected from the party which has groups and political blocs, as well as to settle matters not gained the largest number of seats in the Saeima. which are not covered by the Rules of Procedure, the The Presidium of the Saeima determines the internal ru- Council of Parliamentary Groups is formed. It consists les of the Saeima, gives opinions on the documents sub- of the Saeima Presidium and one Saeima member from mitted and forwards these documents as prescribed by each parliamentary group and political bloc. Decisions of the Rules of Procedure, prepares the agenda of Saeima the Council of Parliamentary Groups are only advisory. sittings, as well as confirms planned business trips.
    [Show full text]
  • English Version Remains the Only Official Document Republic of Latvia Page: 2 Parliamentary Elections, 7 October 2006 OSCE/ODIHR Final Report
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF LATVIA PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 7 October 2006 OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 8 February 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND................................................................................................................... 3 IV. ELECTION SYSTEM................................................................................................................................. 3 V. LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................ 4 A. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 4 B. CANDIDACY RIGHTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Lustration Provisions........................................................................................................................... 4 2. Limitation on the Right of Individuals to Be Elected ........................................................................... 6 C. CITIZENSHIP
    [Show full text]
  • Augusta Hronika Latvijas Republikas Neatkarības Atjaunošana De Facto
    Augusta hronika Latvijas Republikas neatkarības atjaunošana de facto August Chronicles The de facto restoration of the independence of the Republic of Latvia Rīga 2016 Atzīmējot 1991. gada 21. augusta konstitucionālā likuma “Par Latvijas Republikas valstisko statusu” 25. gadadienu, grāmata izdota ar Latvijas Republikas Saeimas Prezidija atbalstu. In honour of the 25th anniversary of the adoption of the constitutional law “On the Statehood of the Republic of Latvia”, this book is published with the support of the Presidium of the Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Sastādītājs / Compiled by Aleksandrs Mirlins Vāka foto – Augusta puča laikā pie Latvijas Republikas Augstākās Padomes sapulcējušies cilvēki. Ulda Pāžes foto, Latvijas Republikas Saeima. Cover photo – People have gathered at the Supreme Council of the Republic of Latvia during the August Putsch. Photo by Uldis Pāže, Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. SATURS | CONTENTS Latvijas Republikas Saeimas priekšsēdētāja Ināra Mūrniece. Laiks, kurā atguvām Latviju . .4 Ināra Mūrniece, Speaker of the Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. The Time We Regained Latvia . .6 Dainis Īvāns. Laipni lūgti neatkarīgajā Latvijā! . .8 Dainis Īvāns. Welcome to the Independent Latvia! . .12 Dokumenti | Documents . .16 Aleksandrs Mirlins. Kā tapa “Augusta hronika” . .372 Aleksandrs Mirlins. The Making of August Chronicles . .373 August Chronicles. .374 Augusta hronika . 401 Personu rādītājs | List of persons . .429 Tematiskais rādītājs | Index . .438 Izdevuma “Janvāra hronika” labojumi un komentāri | Corrections and additional comments to “January Chronicles” . .444 Saīsinājumi | Abbreviations . .447 2 1991. gada 21. augustā konstitucionālā likuma pieņemšanas laikā Doma laukumā plosījās OMON bruņutransportieri. Notikumu attīstība vēl bija neskaidra. Preses namu, Latvijā vienīgo televīziju Zaķusalā, radio namu Doma laukumā bija sagrābuši pučisti.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvijas Ārlietu Simtgade
    LATVIJAS ĀRLIETU SIMTGADE I SĒJUMS: IDEJAS UN PERSONĪBAS LATVIJAS ĀRLIETU SIMTGADE I SĒJUMS: IDEJAS UN PERSONĪBAS LATVIJAS ĀRLIETU SIMTGADE I SĒJUMS: IDEJAS UN PERSONĪBAS Latvijas valsts simtgade ir lielisks iemesls atskatīties uz valsts paveikto – ar lepnumu par daudzajiem sasniegumiem un paškritisku skatu uz to, kas vēl jāpadara. Šī ārlietām veltītā projekta pirmais sējums aplūko galvenos idejiskos strāvojumus Latvijas ārpolitikā un nozīmīgākās personības, kas ir tos attīstījušas. Latvijas un ārvalstu ekspertu komanda aplūko svarīgākās tendences Latvijas ārlietās Starpkaru periodā un mūsdienās, kā arī pievēršas ārpolitiskajai domāšanai trimdas un Atmodas periodā. Autori: Aldis Austers, Edijs Bošs, Raimonds Cerūzis, Mārtiņš Daugulis, Martins Hausdens, Ivars Ījabs, Didzis Kļaviņš, Andis Kudors, Džordans T. Kuks, Andrejs Plakans, Diāna Potjomkina, Gunda Reire, Andris Sprūds, Valters Ščerbinskis, Jānis Taurēns Redaktori: Diāna Potjomkina, Andris Sprūds, Valters Ščerbinskis Zinātniskie recenzenti: Ainārs Lerhis, Toms Rostoks Projektu atbalsta Latvijas Republikas Ārlietu ministrija un Latvijas Republikas Saeima Projekts tapis sadarbībā ar Nacionālo informācijas aģentūru LETA Par rakstu saturu atbild to autori. Autoru viedoklis nav uzskatāms par Latvijas Ārpolitikas institūta, projekta atbalstītāju un partneru, citu pārvaldes iestāžu vai struktūru viedokli. Vāka dizains: Līga Rozentāle Makets: Oskars Stalidzāns Tulkojumi no angļu valodas: Alise Krapāne Latviešu valodas redaktore: Līga Bērziņa ISBN 978-9984-583-85-3 © Rakstu autori, 2016 UDK
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Diplomacy
    History 282 US Diplomatic Discussion Transcript for November 10, 2020 Human Rights Diplomacy Main Reading: Chapter 18 Herring The 1970s were a difficult time for the US in the world, but it was still a period of occasional triumph and flashes of vision for the post-Cold War world. Yet the fundamental challenge for partisan officials was to navigate the issue of human rights and US interests. This was a particular challenge for both Presidents Ford and Carter, though in much different ways. Here is a selection of student comments: HELSINKI ACCORDS (1975) STUDENT COMMENT: “In July 1975, President Gerald Ford traveled to Helinski for a three day summit with thirty-five nations including the Soviet Union (USSR). Establishing three sets of agreements during the summit, the USSR and Western European nations were pleased with the outcome, while the agreements provoked the opposite response in the United States. People saw it as another “Yalta-like ‘betrayal of Eastern Europe’” (827) according to Herring, and the humanitarian agreements were also critiqued for the lack of enforceability of the promised “freer flow of information, ideas, and people through travel, better access to media information, and reunification of families separated by the Cold War.” Herring describes the critiques of Helinski as “politically charged,” making the short-term predictions of the effects of Helinski contradictory to the long-term effects. Herring says that, rather than appeasing the USSR and allowing for control over the rest of Eastern Europe, the agreements “helped to undermine it and indeed eventually to bring about the fall of the USSR” (827).
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: the Saeima of the Latvian Republic
    Directorate-General for the Presidency Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments Factsheet: The Saeima of the Latvian Republic 1.At a glance Latvia is a republic and a parliamentary democracy. Its Parliament, the Saeima, is a unicameral Parliament composed of 100 Members, elected for a maximum term of 4 years. All citizens of Latvia who enjoy full rights of citizenship and who on election day have attained 18 years of age are entitled to vote. The main function of the Saeima is law-making and adopting the state budget, but it also elects the President of the Republic, the State Auditor, and the Central Election Commission, and ratifies international agreements. The work of the Saeima is supervised by its Presidium, which consists of five MPs: the Speaker, two Deputy Speakers, the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary. The Saeima may give a vote of confidence or no confidence in the government. On the motion of not less than one-half of the Members of the Saeima, the Saeima may at a secret sitting decide by a two-thirds majority to dismiss the President and immediately appoint a successor. Draft laws may be presented to the Saeima by the President of State, the Cabinet, and the Committees of the Saeima, no less than five individual Members of the Saeima or, in cases and in a manner provided for in the Constitution, by one-tenth of the electorate. On 3 June 2015, the Saeima elected Mr Raimonds Vejonis President of the Republic. 2. Composition Results of the general elections on 4 October 2014 Party EP affiliation % Seats Saskaņas Centrs (SC) 23% 24 Harmony Ccentre Vienotība (V) 21,87% 23 Unity Zaļo un Zemnieku savienīb (ZZS) 19,53% 21 Union of Greens and Farmers Nacionālās apvienības "Visu Latvijai!" VL-TB/LNNK 16,61 17 Nacional Alliance "All for Latvia!" Latvijas Re´gionu Apvieniba 6,66% 8 Alliance Of regions of Latvia No sirds Latvijai 6,85 7 For Latvia from the Heart 100% 100 Turnout : 58,85% The next election will take place in 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • CSCE Testimonies Jaakko Iloniemi / Finland Jiří Opršal / Czechoslovakia Jacques Andreani / France
    CSCE Testimonies Jaakko Iloniemi / Finland Jiří Opršal / Czechoslovakia Jacques Andreani / France Edouard Brunner / Switzerland Peter Steglich / GDR Mario Michele Alessi / Italy 1972–1989 CSCE Oral History Project / Occasional Paper – 2013 Evarist Saliba / Malta Yuri V. Dubinin / Soviet Union Spencer Oliver / USA CSCE Testimonies Time line 1990–2012 Organization for Security and 1972–1989 CSCE Oral History Project Time line 1972 –1991 Q Bodies no longer in existence Co-operation in Europe Causes and Consequences of the Helsinki Final Act QThe “Helsinki process” Qx CSCE/OSCE Institutions QPreparatory Meetings to Follow-up Qx Follow-up meetings 1972–1989 Meetings Q Summit meetings QFollow-up Meetings Q Ministerial Councils QVenues of a politico-military nature Q Economic and Environmental Forum QVenues concerning economic and environmental issues Q Permanent Council Venues concerning Human Dimension discussions Q Q humanitarian issues Politico-Militray negotiations Q Venues concerning the CSCE Q Q Activites with Mediterranean Mediterranean region and Asian Partners for cooperation OSCE Prague Office Archives CSCE OralCSCE History Oral Project History / Occasional Project 2013 Paper – 2013 CSCE Testimonies Causes and Consequences of the Helsinki Final Act 1972–1989 Published by the Prague Offi ce of the OSCE Secretariat náměstí Pod Kaštany 2 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic Compiled by Alice Němcová © OSCE 2013 All rights reserved. Written contents of this publication may be used freely and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes provided that such usage and reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE Prague Offi ce Archives as the source ISBN 978-92-9235-018-5 Design & Layout: © Jan Dvořák/HQ Kontakt Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO and the European Union
    Order Code RL32342 NATO and the European Union Updated January 29, 2008 Kristin Archick Specialist in European Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Paul Gallis Specialist in European Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division NATO and the European Union Summary Since the end of the Cold War, both NATO and the European Union (EU) have evolved along with Europe’s changed strategic landscape. While NATO’s collective defense guarantee remains at the core of the alliance, members have also sought to redefine its mission as new security challenges have emerged on Europe’s periphery and beyond. At the same time, EU members have taken steps toward political integration with decisions to develop a common foreign policy and a defense arm to improve EU member states’ abilities to manage security crises, such as those that engulfed the Balkans in the 1990s. The evolution of NATO and the EU, however, has generated some friction between the United States and several of its allies over the security responsibilities of the two organizations. U.S.-European differences center around threat assessment, defense institutions, and military capabilities. Successive U.S. administrations and the U.S. Congress have called for enhanced European defense capabilities to enable the allies to better share the security burden, and to ensure that NATO’s post-Cold War mission embraces combating terrorism and countering the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. U.S. policymakers, backed by Congress, support EU efforts to develop a European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP) provided that it remains tied to NATO and does not threaten the transatlantic relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 LATVIA Human Development Report
    LATVIA LATVIA Human Development Report Human Development Report Development Human 2019/2020 The Latvia Human Development Report has been published since 1995. The Advanced Social and Political Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Latvia has managed and edited the Report in collaboration with partners across Latvia since 2005. The 2019/2020 Report investigates the Europeanization of Latvia – the impact that membership of the European Union (EU) has left on Latvian politics and government, economy and society. The authors of the first part of the Report focus on changes and modernization of the state, examining, in particular, Europeanization of the political system, public administration and local governments, as well as foreign affairs and the judicial system. It also assesses the EU’s impact upon the economy. The second part of the report focuses mainly on the impact of the EU on people, society and mass media. The authors reveal that the EU’s impact is pronounced in the main political institutions and that the membership of the EU has fostered extensive modernization of governance. At the same time, although there has been a large-scale reorientation towards European values, Latvia’s membership in the EU has not achieved substantive change in combatting poverty, inequality and depopulation of rural areas. These problems, similarly to economic development, are national-level issues, which can be resolved only through domestic government led reforms. 2019/2020 EUROPEANIZATION Advanced Social and Political Research Institute OF LATVIA ISBN 978-9934-18-661-5 2019/2020 LATVIA Human Development Report EUROPEANIZATION OF LATVIA Advanced Social and Political Research Institute Latvia.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia's 15 Years in the European Union
    THE DILIGENT TEENAGER: LATVIA’S 15 YEARS IN THE LATVIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 15 YEARS EUROPEAN UNION Photo 1 Fifteen years ago, on 1 May 2004, Latvia The day of the EU enlargement. On 1 May joined the European Union (EU), thus closing 2004, ten countries became the new EU almost ten-year long process of accession. Member States: Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Given the sensitive geo-political situation, the Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, choice in favour of Europe was self-evident, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. even though, the ideas of neutrality or closer Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission, Pat Cox, President of the cooperation with the Commonwealth of European Parliament and many EU Heads of Independent States originally emerged in the State and Government, including President political environment. However, the history Vaira-Vīķe Freiberga, attended the official was still alive in people’s memories, and it enlargement ceremony in Dublin. also determined the fate of Latvia in favour of Photo: The European Community, Maxwell’s, integration into the EU, by choosing the so- Irish Presidency called ‘return to Europe’. When regaining independence, Latvia based its statehood on the values of the republic proclaimed in 1918, providing that Latvia is an independent, democratic and parliamentary state. Accession to the EU provided for the strengthening of these values, by incorporating in the family of western democratic states, as well as the economic prosperity, well-being and security of Latvia by cooperating with like-minded countries. It would be difficult to challenge this choice now: the EU is the largest trading Photo 1 bloc in the world, the euro is the second largest currency in the world, the EU is a global leader in combating climate change the most developed countries by the Human and providing development aid; its population Development Index of the United Nations has almost the highest life expectancy in Organization.
    [Show full text]