2019/2020 LATVIA Human Development Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2019/2020 LATVIA Human Development Report LATVIA LATVIA Human Development Report Human Development Report Development Human 2019/2020 The Latvia Human Development Report has been published since 1995. The Advanced Social and Political Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Latvia has managed and edited the Report in collaboration with partners across Latvia since 2005. The 2019/2020 Report investigates the Europeanization of Latvia – the impact that membership of the European Union (EU) has left on Latvian politics and government, economy and society. The authors of the first part of the Report focus on changes and modernization of the state, examining, in particular, Europeanization of the political system, public administration and local governments, as well as foreign affairs and the judicial system. It also assesses the EU’s impact upon the economy. The second part of the report focuses mainly on the impact of the EU on people, society and mass media. The authors reveal that the EU’s impact is pronounced in the main political institutions and that the membership of the EU has fostered extensive modernization of governance. At the same time, although there has been a large-scale reorientation towards European values, Latvia’s membership in the EU has not achieved substantive change in combatting poverty, inequality and depopulation of rural areas. These problems, similarly to economic development, are national-level issues, which can be resolved only through domestic government led reforms. 2019/2020 EUROPEANIZATION Advanced Social and Political Research Institute OF LATVIA ISBN 978-9934-18-661-5 2019/2020 LATVIA Human Development Report EUROPEANIZATION OF LATVIA Advanced Social and Political Research Institute Latvia. Human Development Report 2019/2020. Europeanization of Latvia. Editor-in-chief Daunis Auers. Riga: Advanced Social and Political Research Institute of the University of Latvia, 2020, 152 pp., illustrations, tables, map. ISBN 978-9934- 18-661-5 The text of this publication is not copyright protected. This text, both in full and in part, may be used without prior permis- sion; however, acknowledgement of the source is mandatory. Advanced Social and Political Research Institute Editor-in-chief Daunis Auers Project manager Anete Skrastiņa Statistician Anita Švarckopfa Authors of Introduction: Daunis Auers, Ivo Rollis Authors of Chapter 1: Daunis Auers, Iveta Reinholde, Toms Rostoks, Morten Hansen, Jānis Pleps Authors of Chapter 2: Baiba Bela, Aija Zobena, Klinta Ločmele, Vita Zelče The survey about the attitudes, values of Latvia’s inhabitants and the awareness of Latvia’s Europeanization was conducted by the research centre SKDS. Data tables about basic facts of Latvia, human development index and statistical indicators were prepared by Anita Švarckopfa. Scientific reviewers: Dr. Žaneta Ozoliņa, Professor, University of Latvia, Faculty of Social Sciences, senior researcher at Advanced Social and Political Research Institute Dr. Kārlis Bukovskis, Assistant Professor, Riga Stradins University, Department of Political Science, Deputy-director and researcher at Latvian Institute of International Affairs Recommended for publication by the University of Latvia Board of Social Sciences, decision No. 2 of December 3, 2020. Latvian language editor Ruta Puriņa English language editors Christopher Goddard, Daunis Auers Translation from English into Latvian by Andra Damberga Translation from Latvian into English by Ingūna Beķere Cover design, inside page design and layout by Baiba Lazdiņa Picture copyright shutterstock.com The editors thank Aija Zobena and Renārs Felcis for their work on the survey and questionnaire. The editors thank Jānis Ikstens, Aija Zobena, and Ilze Kāposta for organisational assistance. ISBN 978-9934-18-661-5 https://doi.org/10.22364/lvhdr.2019.2020 Foreword Throughout centuries the Latvian nation has evol- and makes us co-responsible for sustainable and demo- ved, existed and developed as a nation deeply rooted in cratic development of united Europe. European culture. We all have a twofold identity: we are We can distinguish between three periods of Latvia’s Latvians and at the same time Europeans. We identify European integration. The first period began with resto- ourselves and care about not only our own local commu- ration of independence in 1990/1991 and ended when we nity, specific cultural and historical Latvian land or state joined the European Union in 2004. Latvia needed these of Latvia, but also Europe as a whole. roughly 15 years to restructure its economy, political and European identity, physical and spiritual affiliation legal system, realign its values with Western, specifically with European culture has always been the cornerstone the European, democratic standards. It was the transition of Latvia’s international stance, a crucial element of our period for the state and the society, which transformed political and legal culture and the way we think about nearly every area of our life and taught us the importance our state. Human dignity, human rights and freedoms, of adjusting to new circumstances as quickly as possible. democracy, rule of law and solidarity are European The experience now deeply embedded in the national values that have naturally shaped and moulded Latvia as consciousness, this tough experience, is a great advan- a nation state. tage in modern, fast changing and unpredictable world, Article 68 of our constitution, Satversme, indica- which allows us to adjust and even proactively prepare tes the very reason we are a member of the European for any global shifts a lot easier than many other nations Union – Latvia needs Europe to strengthen its democ- can, including the big ones. racy. European dimension has enabled Latvia to establish The second period of European integration came a balanced and well-developed democracy and spread after we became an EU member state. We had to trans- the rule of law across Latvia. It contributes to sustainable pose European Union laws, standards and political logic. development of Latvia and serves our collective interests. This period, which began after 2004 and lasts until today, Whereas the preamble of our constitution, Satversme, can be described as period of our European matura- provides a legal and political framework for European tion. I truly believe that as we enter the third decade of dimension of our policies that the state and the society the 21st century thirty years after regaining our national should follow. It underscores the geopolitical affiliation of independence and 15 years since joining the European the state and nation of Latvia with European cultural space Union, when a whole generation of Latvians has grown in fully independent Latvia, we are ready to enter the next standards that are often considered ‘less European’ than phase of our European integration. The first two phases theirs, which can partly be also blamed on our inability to of European integration where asymmetric: Latvia had break out of this ‘asymmetrical infatuation’. However, in to take over European experiences, standards, thinking both cases this distinction between core and periphery paradigms and values, whereas now we, the Latvians, seems to be outdated and out of place. We need to make conceive ourselves as true Europeans, just like Finns, conscious effort on both sides to end this prejudice as Dutch, Austrians and other European nations. soon as possible. That means we are no longer on the receiving end We need to replace them with new collective para- only – we are not merely transposing and implementing digms based on experience, standards and values of all European standards, thinking paradigms or values. Our European nations, which are given equal recognition. actions, way of thinking and values are European by United Europe is comprised of nations that are equal and default. That is our contribution to European project, treat each other as peers. All European Union member the way we strengthen common European standards, states, including Latvia, are equally responsible for help fulfil its values and development objectives. We play the future of Europe. Europe needs Latvia and its contri- the same role as Finns, Germans, Estonians, Portuguese bution to the future development of common European and other European nations in this process. And we are project. very much open to best practices of other European nations, as much as they are open to best practices coming from Latvia. Undoubtedly, old Europe is still suffering from lack of Egils Levits ability to recognise the merits of our position, values and President of the Republic of Latvia Contents Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Illustrations, tables, boxes ............................................................................................................................... 6 Basic facts about Latvia, 2019 ......................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction Daunis Auers, Ivo Rollis ................................................................................................... 10 Part 1 Politics, law and the economy .................................................................................... 16 1.1. Daunis Auers. Europeanization of Latvia’s political system ....................................................... 17 1.2. Iveta Reinholde. Europeanization, soft
Recommended publications
  • EU Enlargement and Latvian Citizenship Policy
    EU Enlargement and Latvian Citizenship Policy HELEN M. MORRIS Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium Issue 1/2003 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) Schiffbrücke 12 (Kompagnietor Building) D-24939 Flensburg Germany ( +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ecmi.de EU Enlargement and Latvian Citizenship Policy HELEN M. MORRIS Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, Belgium This article examines whether its the desire to join the European Union exerted any influence upon Latvian nationality policy. The author concludes that external pressure upon Latvian policymakers during the accession process led to a significantly more liberal and inclusive citizenship law than might have otherwise been adopted. The analysis includes an assessment of current concerns in nationality and minority policy in Latvia including the large number and status of non-citizens, the application of language legislation, and the reform of the education system. EU membership is expected to make Latvian citizenship more attractive for non-citizens and the country will continue to be required to meet its international obligations regarding treatment of the non-citizen population and minorities. However, there is a risk that the completion of accession negotiations and accompanying reduction in European Commission influence coupled with intense pressure on limited economic and administrative resources in the new member states will sideline respect for and protection of minority rights. I. Introduction Since regaining independence in 1991, Latvian nationality policy has developed from an exclusive, almost restitutionist, policy seeking to identify the Latvian state with the Latvian nation into a more inclusive civic definition of Latvian citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Augusta Hronika Latvijas Republikas Neatkarības Atjaunošana De Facto
    Augusta hronika Latvijas Republikas neatkarības atjaunošana de facto August Chronicles The de facto restoration of the independence of the Republic of Latvia Rīga 2016 Atzīmējot 1991. gada 21. augusta konstitucionālā likuma “Par Latvijas Republikas valstisko statusu” 25. gadadienu, grāmata izdota ar Latvijas Republikas Saeimas Prezidija atbalstu. In honour of the 25th anniversary of the adoption of the constitutional law “On the Statehood of the Republic of Latvia”, this book is published with the support of the Presidium of the Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. Sastādītājs / Compiled by Aleksandrs Mirlins Vāka foto – Augusta puča laikā pie Latvijas Republikas Augstākās Padomes sapulcējušies cilvēki. Ulda Pāžes foto, Latvijas Republikas Saeima. Cover photo – People have gathered at the Supreme Council of the Republic of Latvia during the August Putsch. Photo by Uldis Pāže, Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. SATURS | CONTENTS Latvijas Republikas Saeimas priekšsēdētāja Ināra Mūrniece. Laiks, kurā atguvām Latviju . .4 Ināra Mūrniece, Speaker of the Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. The Time We Regained Latvia . .6 Dainis Īvāns. Laipni lūgti neatkarīgajā Latvijā! . .8 Dainis Īvāns. Welcome to the Independent Latvia! . .12 Dokumenti | Documents . .16 Aleksandrs Mirlins. Kā tapa “Augusta hronika” . .372 Aleksandrs Mirlins. The Making of August Chronicles . .373 August Chronicles. .374 Augusta hronika . 401 Personu rādītājs | List of persons . .429 Tematiskais rādītājs | Index . .438 Izdevuma “Janvāra hronika” labojumi un komentāri | Corrections and additional comments to “January Chronicles” . .444 Saīsinājumi | Abbreviations . .447 2 1991. gada 21. augustā konstitucionālā likuma pieņemšanas laikā Doma laukumā plosījās OMON bruņutransportieri. Notikumu attīstība vēl bija neskaidra. Preses namu, Latvijā vienīgo televīziju Zaķusalā, radio namu Doma laukumā bija sagrābuši pučisti.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvijas Ārlietu Simtgade
    LATVIJAS ĀRLIETU SIMTGADE I SĒJUMS: IDEJAS UN PERSONĪBAS LATVIJAS ĀRLIETU SIMTGADE I SĒJUMS: IDEJAS UN PERSONĪBAS LATVIJAS ĀRLIETU SIMTGADE I SĒJUMS: IDEJAS UN PERSONĪBAS Latvijas valsts simtgade ir lielisks iemesls atskatīties uz valsts paveikto – ar lepnumu par daudzajiem sasniegumiem un paškritisku skatu uz to, kas vēl jāpadara. Šī ārlietām veltītā projekta pirmais sējums aplūko galvenos idejiskos strāvojumus Latvijas ārpolitikā un nozīmīgākās personības, kas ir tos attīstījušas. Latvijas un ārvalstu ekspertu komanda aplūko svarīgākās tendences Latvijas ārlietās Starpkaru periodā un mūsdienās, kā arī pievēršas ārpolitiskajai domāšanai trimdas un Atmodas periodā. Autori: Aldis Austers, Edijs Bošs, Raimonds Cerūzis, Mārtiņš Daugulis, Martins Hausdens, Ivars Ījabs, Didzis Kļaviņš, Andis Kudors, Džordans T. Kuks, Andrejs Plakans, Diāna Potjomkina, Gunda Reire, Andris Sprūds, Valters Ščerbinskis, Jānis Taurēns Redaktori: Diāna Potjomkina, Andris Sprūds, Valters Ščerbinskis Zinātniskie recenzenti: Ainārs Lerhis, Toms Rostoks Projektu atbalsta Latvijas Republikas Ārlietu ministrija un Latvijas Republikas Saeima Projekts tapis sadarbībā ar Nacionālo informācijas aģentūru LETA Par rakstu saturu atbild to autori. Autoru viedoklis nav uzskatāms par Latvijas Ārpolitikas institūta, projekta atbalstītāju un partneru, citu pārvaldes iestāžu vai struktūru viedokli. Vāka dizains: Līga Rozentāle Makets: Oskars Stalidzāns Tulkojumi no angļu valodas: Alise Krapāne Latviešu valodas redaktore: Līga Bērziņa ISBN 978-9984-583-85-3 © Rakstu autori, 2016 UDK
    [Show full text]
  • Latvia's 15 Years in the European Union
    THE DILIGENT TEENAGER: LATVIA’S 15 YEARS IN THE LATVIA IN THE EUROPEAN UNION 15 YEARS EUROPEAN UNION Photo 1 Fifteen years ago, on 1 May 2004, Latvia The day of the EU enlargement. On 1 May joined the European Union (EU), thus closing 2004, ten countries became the new EU almost ten-year long process of accession. Member States: Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Given the sensitive geo-political situation, the Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, choice in favour of Europe was self-evident, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. even though, the ideas of neutrality or closer Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission, Pat Cox, President of the cooperation with the Commonwealth of European Parliament and many EU Heads of Independent States originally emerged in the State and Government, including President political environment. However, the history Vaira-Vīķe Freiberga, attended the official was still alive in people’s memories, and it enlargement ceremony in Dublin. also determined the fate of Latvia in favour of Photo: The European Community, Maxwell’s, integration into the EU, by choosing the so- Irish Presidency called ‘return to Europe’. When regaining independence, Latvia based its statehood on the values of the republic proclaimed in 1918, providing that Latvia is an independent, democratic and parliamentary state. Accession to the EU provided for the strengthening of these values, by incorporating in the family of western democratic states, as well as the economic prosperity, well-being and security of Latvia by cooperating with like-minded countries. It would be difficult to challenge this choice now: the EU is the largest trading Photo 1 bloc in the world, the euro is the second largest currency in the world, the EU is a global leader in combating climate change the most developed countries by the Human and providing development aid; its population Development Index of the United Nations has almost the highest life expectancy in Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • DNB Latvijas Barometrs” Nr.85 Numura Tēma: Latvijas 2015.Nr.8 Gada Novembris5 Barometrs Valsts Svētki Un Patriotisms (2015
    „DNB Latvijas barometrs” Nr.85 Numura tēma: Latvijas 2015.Nr.8 gada novembris5 barometrs Valsts svētki un patriotisms (2015. gada oktobra aptaujas dati) „DNB Latvijas barometra” apraksts „DNB Latvijas barometrs” ir Latvijas iedzīvotāju noskaņojuma, viedokļu un attieksmes pret dažādiem sociāliem, ekonomiskiem u.c. jautājumiem pētījums, kurš ietver arī dažādu sfēru pazīstamu ekspertu vērtējumu un cēloņsakarību analīzi. „DNB Latvijas barometrs” tiek veidots katru mēnesi, un tajā tiek pētītas konkrētā brīža aktuālākās norises. Paralēli katrā no aptaujām sabiedrībai tiek uzdots arī indikatoru jautājumu kopums, kas norāda uz vispārējā sabiedrības noskaņojuma izmaiņām. Dati tiek iegūti SKDS Latvijas pastāvīgo iedzīvotāju aptaujā, veicot tiešās intervijas respondentu dzīves vietās. Ar stratificētās nejaušās izlases metodi katru mēnesi tiek aptaujāti ne mazāk kā 1000 respondenti vecumā no 18 līdz 74 gadiem visā Latvijā. Izlase ir reprezentatīva attiecībā pret ģenerālo kopumu. Pētījuma statistiskā kļūda kopējiem atbilžu sadalījumiem nepārsniedz + / - 3% robežas. „DNB Latvijas barometra” Nr.85 satura rādītājs Informācija par „DNB Latvijas barometru” ....................................................................................................................... 1 I DAĻA - INDIKATORI Kopējais sabiedrības noskaņojums .................................................................................................................................. 3 Tagadnes un nākotnes vērtējums ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary of Latvia's Foreign Affairs
    THE CENTENARY OF LATVIA’S FOREIGN AFFAIRS IDEAS AND PERSONALITIES THE CENTENARY OF LATVIA’S FOREIGN AFFAIRS IDEAS AND PERSONALITIES THE CENTENARY OF LATVIA’S FOREIGN AFFAIRS IDEAS AND PERSONALITIES The upcoming centennial of Latvia’s statehood provides an important occasion to reflect on the country’s international achievements and offer a self-critical look at what remains to be done. This publication identifies main currents in Latvia’s foreign policy thinking and the most remarkable individuals that contributed to shaping them. A team of local and foreign experts reviews key ideational trends in Latvia’s foreign policy during the Interwar period and today, as well as assesses the trajectories of thinking during the periods of exile and regaining independence. Authors: Aldis Austers, Edijs Bošs, Raimonds Cerūzis, Mārtiņš Daugulis, Martyn Housden, Ivars Ījabs, Didzis Kļaviņš, Jordan T. Kuck, Andis Kudors, Andrejs Plakans, Diāna Potjomkina, Gunda Reire, Andris Sprūds, Valters Ščerbinskis, Jānis Taurēns Editors: Diāna Potjomkina, Andris Sprūds, Valters Ščerbinskis Scientific reviewers: Ainārs Lerhis, Toms Rostoks This project was made possible thanks to support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia and the Saeima of the Republic of Latvia The project was completed in cooperation with National Information Agency LETA The respective authors are accountable for the content of individual articles. The opinions expressed by the authors should not be construed as representing those of the Latvian Institute of International Affairs, project supporters or partners, other government institutions or entities. Cover design: Līga Rozentāle Layout: Oskars Stalidzāns Translations from Latvian: Alise Krapāne, Jurijs Saveļjevs, Pāvels Smišļājevs English language editor (select chapters): Dillon J.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    Riga Graduate School of Law TWENTY YEARS OF INNOVATION Eyewitness Accounts of Riga Graduate School of Law Riga, 2018 Twenty years of innovation: eyewitness accounts of Riga Graduate School of Law - Riga: Riga Graduate School of Law, 2018, 87 p. Editorial Board: Jānis Ikstens, Ligita Gjortlere, Līva Biseniece Editor: Ligita Gjortlere Language editor: Roberts Līsmanis Photos by: Jānis Buls, Kaspars Garda, Mārcis Gaujenietis, Reinis Inkēns, Māris Kaparkalējs, Andris Krieviņš, Agnese Lāce, Mārtiņš Plūme, Kristiāns Putniņš, Gatis Rozenfelds, Andrejs Terentjevs, Alfrēds Ulmanis, Ilmārs Znotiņš Graphical design: Anda Nordena ©Riga Graduate School of Law and the authors, 2018 ISBN 978-9934-8684-1-2 Contents Foreword 2008 Jānis Ikstens ....................... 5 Mārtiņš Mits . 43 Prehistory Kushtrim Istrefi ....................46 Ieva Morica ........................ 6 2009 1998 Waleed Gumaa .................... 48 Linda Freimane . 9 Reinis Bērziņš . 51 1999 2010 Ilona Čeiča ........................ 13 Peter Gjortler . 52 Evika Siliņa .........................15 2011 2000 Raimonds Slaidiņš ................. 56 Aleksandra Meleško ................17 2012 2001 Ilze Rūse .......................... 58 Egils Levits .........................19 2013 2002 George Ulrich . 61 Māris Brizgo ...................... 23 2014 2003 Ieva Miļūna ....................... 64 Ivo Klotiņš ........................ 26 Andrejs Pildegovičs ................ 67 2004 2015 Zane Vāgnere ..................... 28 Reinis Znotiņš ......................71 Moritz Wagner ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Lab: Transatlantic Approaches on Digital Governance – a New Social Contract for the Age of AI
    Policy Lab: Transatlantic Approaches on Digital Governance – A New Social Contract for the Age of AI PROGRAMME 16 September 2020 15:00 – 15:05 Introduction to the Policy Lab on Transatlantic Approaches on Digital Governance: A New Social Contract in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Master of Ceremonies: Milburn Line, Senior Advisor for Policy and Content at the Shared Societies Project of the WLA-CdM 15:05 – 15:30 Welcome Session • Danilo Türk, President of WLA-CdM, President of Slovenia (2007-2012) • Manuel Muñiz, Secretary of State for Global Spain, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation of Spain • Mr. Nguyen Van Tuong, Chairman of Tram Huong Khanh Hoa • Governor Michael Dukakis, Chair of The Boston Global Forum 15:30 – 15:45 Keynote Speech “Transatlantic Relations and the Digital Social Contract” Manuel Muñiz, Secretary of State for Global Spain, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation of Spain 15:45 – 16:40 Introductory Session: A New Social Contract in the Age of AI Keynote: Thomas Patterson, Research Director of The Michael Dukakis Institute for Leadership and Innovation, Professor of Government and the Press of Harvard Kennedy School Facilitator: Ramu Damodaran, Editor-in-Chief of the UN Chronicle and Chief of the United Nations Academic Impact Panel discussion: • Valdis Birkavs, WLA-CdM Member, Prime Minister of Latvia (1993-1994) • Jerry Jones, WLA-CdM Advisor Executive Vice-President, Ethics and Legal Officer, Live Ramp and Advisor • Nuria Oliver, IEEE Fellow, ACM Fellow, member of
    [Show full text]
  • Krievijas Karaspēka Izvešana No Latvijas 1992–1994: Diplomātiska Uzvara Vai Politiska Piekāpšanās?
    rAkSTI KRIEVIJAS KARASPĒKA IZVEŠANA NO Latvijas 1992–1994: diplomātiska uzvara vai POLITISKA PIEKĀPŠANĀS? Tālavs Jundzis Atslēgas vārdi: Krievija karaspēks, stratēģiskie objekti, militārie pensionāri, starpvalstu sarunas, karaspēka izvešana, Latvijas–Krievijas līgums Raksts tapis sakarā ar bij. Padomju Savienības (kopš 1992. g. 28. janvāra — Krievi- jas) karaspēka izvešanas 20. gadadienu no Latvijas. Tā mērķis ir noskaidrot, cik lielā mērā 1994. g. 30. aprīlī noslēgtais Latvijas–Krievijas līgums par karaspēka izvešanu atbilst Latvi- jas un starptautiskajām interesēm. Rakstā analizētas Latvijas un Krievijas pozīcijas sarunās un jautājumi, kas radīja lielākās domstarpības. Pievērsta uzmanība starptautisko organizā- ciju un rietumvalstu lomai Krievijas karaspēka izvešanā, īpaši uzsverot ASV un Zviedrijas ieguldījumu. Raksta nobeigumā autors secina, ka Krievijas karaspēka izvešana no Latvijas nebūtu uzskatāma par Latvijas vai starptautiskās sabiedrības diplomātisko uzvaru, bet gan par mācību, veidojot savu drošības politiku attiecībās ar Krieviju mūsdienās un nākotnē. Raksts ieguvis jaunu aktualitāti sakarā ar Krievijas īstenoto agresiju Ukrainā un ar Baltijas valstu bažām par savu drošību. Neatkarības atjaunošanas pasludināšana kara Latvijas kādreizējās Kara ministrijas Latvijā 1990. g. 4. maijā notika ne tikai sa- ēkā. Tam pakļāvās karaspēks ne tikai Latvijā, režģītos politiskos apstākļos, bet arī ievēroja- bet arī Igaunijā, Lietuvā un Krievijas Federā- ma PSRS karaspēka kontingenta klātbūtnē. cijas Kaļiņingradas apgabalā. PSRS militārās Okupācijas militārā sistēma Latvijā un pārē- struktūras apsargāja un pilnībā kontrolēja jās Baltijas valstīs saglabājās pamatos ne- Latvijas jūras un gaisa robežu ar rietum- mainīga līdz pat neatkarības faktiskajai atgū- valstīm. šanai. Tā pilnībā pakļāvās PSRS politiskajai PSRS militāristi Latvijā un pārējās Balti- un militārajai vadībai, kura neatzina Latvijas, jas valstīs politiskās neitralitātes vietā aktīvi Lietuvas un Igaunijas pasludināto neatkarību.
    [Show full text]
  • Komparace Postavení Prezidentů V Politických Systémech Estonska a Lotyšska
    FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Komparace postavení prezidentů v politických systémech Estonska a Lotyšska Bakalářská práce KLÁRA KLEČKOVÁ UČO: 457428 Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Jakub Šedo, Ph.D. Katedra politologie Politologie Brno 2018/2019 1 KOMPARACE POSTAVENÍ PREZIDENTŮ V POLITICKÝCH SYSTÉMECH ESTONSKA A LOTYŠSKA Bibliografický záznam Autor: Klára Klečková Fakulta sociálních studií, Masarykova univerzita Katedra politologie Název práce: Komparace postavení prezidentů v politických systémech Estonska a Lotyšska Studijní program: Politologie Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Jakub Šedo, Ph.D. Akademický rok: 2018/2019 Počet stran: 83 Klíčová slova: Estonsko, Lotyšsko, prezident, komparace, ústava 3 KOMPARACE POSTAVENÍ PREZIDENTŮ V POLITICKÝCH SYSTÉMECH ESTONSKA A LOTYŠSKA Bibliografic record Author: Klára Klečková Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University Department of Political Science Title of Thesis: Comparison of the position of presidents in the political systems of Estonia and Latvia Degree Programme: Supervisor: Mgr. Jakub Šedo, Ph.D. Academic Year: 2018/2019 Number of Pages: 83 Keywords: Estonia, Latvia, president, comparison, Consti- tution 4 KOMPARACE POSTAVENÍ PREZIDENTŮ V POLITICKÝCH SYSTÉMECH ESTONSKA A LOTYŠSKA Abstrakt Práce srovnává postavení hlav státu v Estonsku a Lotyšsku. Zaměřuje se na způsob volby prezidenta a možnost jeho odvolání a na jeho pravo- moci týkající se jmenování nové vlády, rozpouštění parlamentu a zamí- tání legislativních návrhů. Starší a stručnější lotyšská ústava předpo- kládá silnější prezidentské pravomoci, zatímco estonský prezident má především ceremoniální úlohu. Práce dále zjišťuje, zda tyto závěry ko- respondují s reálným postavením prezidentů, přičemž dochází k závěru, že s výjimkou první estonské hlavy státu byli lotyšští prezidenti dopo- sud vždy aktivnějšími politickými hráči. 1 KOMPARACE POSTAVENÍ PREZIDENTŮ V POLITICKÝCH SYSTÉMECH ESTONSKA A LOTYŠSKA Abstract Thesis compares position of the head of state of Estonia and Latvia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Seat at the Table
    A SEAT AT THE TABLE Women’s Leadership for Peace and Security in the Greater Horn of Africa Annual Project Report May 2009 – October 2010 DRAFT – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR FOR CITATION With thanks to the Governments of Belgium, Norway, Germany and Iceland and to the Institute for Inclusive Security Compiled by Orla de Díez Conference “10 years of UNSCR 1325: Ensuring Women’s Participation in Peace and Security” Brussels, 9 September 2010 Hosted by EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton and the Belgian Minister of Foreign Affairs Steven Vanackere “The Short History of G40 and the Road Ahead” Speech delivered by Kamilia Kuku on behalf of G40 Baroness Catherine Ashton Deputy Prime Minister Steven Vanackere Distinguished panelists, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for this opportunity My name is Kamilia Kuku and I am going to talk about the Group of 40 Women Leaders (G40), to which I belong: a community of teachers, humanitarian workers, lawyers, grassroots peace activists, political scientists, business professionals, historians, social workers, human rights defenders and journalists that was formed in 2009 to bring fresh thinking to building peace in the Greater Horn of Africa and to push new ideas into action through the communal might of our networks and constituencies in Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Somaliland, Sudan and Uganda. By way of a three-year strategy launched in October 2009, under the auspices of the African Union and the United Nations, and the pooled support of the Club de Madrid, Isis-WICCE and the Institute for Security Studies, we are forging new relations and partnerships with major stakeholders and powerbrokers in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo Dribins, Armands Gūtmanis, Marģers Vestermanis LATVIA S
    29/5/2014 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia: LATVIA MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA Leo Dribins, Armands Gūtmanis, Marģers Vestermanis LATVIA���s JEWISH COMMUNITY: HISTORY, TRAGEDY, REVIVAL Contents Opening Address by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia Indulis Bērziņš Leo Dribins THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IN LATVIA A Brief Chronological Survey The Ban of the Crusaders The Ban of the Kings The Gate of Piltene The Jews Settle throughout Kurzeme and Zemgale Jewish Refugees Settle in Latgale Judenherberge 18th-century Banishments The Benevolence of Catherine II and Ernst Biron The Kahali of Latgale The Jews and the Latvian Peasants Contrasts between ���Transformation��� and Emancipation The Good Years under the Rule of Alexander II Opposition to the Pogrom Policy Latvian Attitudes Jews During the Revolution of 1905 The Deportation of 1915 http://www.mfa.gov.lv/en/ministry/publications/4299/?print=on 1/44 29/5/2014 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Latvia: LATVIA In Exile The Citizens of Independent Latvia Jews in the Latvian War of Independence The Demographic and Sociological Picture of the Latvian Jewish Community The Role of Jews in the Renewal and Development of the National Economy The Structure of Jewish Political Life Jewish Schools Jews in Latvia���s Cultural Life Religious Life The Attack of Anti-Semitism The Attitude of the Authoritarian Government of Kārlis Ulmanis��� Towards the Jews Under the Hammer and Sickle The Holocaust in Latvia The First Stage of the Greatest Criminal
    [Show full text]