Reconfiguring National Identity in the Berlin Republic
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cultural Acceptance of Digitalization and Growth of an Economy: a Comparison of East and West Germany Everett Benner Skidmore College
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Skidmore College: Creative Matter Skidmore College Creative Matter Economics Student Theses and Capstone Projects Economics 2017 Cultural Acceptance of Digitalization and Growth of an Economy: A Comparison of East and West Germany Everett Benner Skidmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/econ_studt_schol Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Benner, Everett, "Cultural Acceptance of Digitalization and Growth of an Economy: A Comparison of East and West Germany" (2017). Economics Student Theses and Capstone Projects. 53. https://creativematter.skidmore.edu/econ_studt_schol/53 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics at Creative Matter. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics Student Theses and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of Creative Matter. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Brooks Benner Cultural Acceptance of Digitalization and Growth of an Economy: A Comparison of East and West Germany By Brooks Benner This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course Senior Seminar (EC 375), during the Spring semester of 2017 Name: _______________________ Signature: ____________________ 1 Brooks Benner Abstract In the following paper aims to analyze the significance and relevance that change in cultural acceptance of digitalization has on the output gap (in terms of GDP) between East and West Germany based on the borders that existed between WWII and reunification in 1989. Culture will be measured by taking Google Trend data for the search term “Facebook,” broken down by State (16) between the years 2004 and 2014. -
Bezpieczeństwo Teoria I Praktyka Nr 1-2, 2008
C zasopism o Krakowskiej Szkoły Wyższej im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego BEZPiECZENSTWO TEORIA I PRAKTYKA numer 1-2 (I) Kraków 2008 BEZPIECZEŃSTWO TEORIA I PRAKTYKA Czasopismo Krakowskiej Adres redakcji Szkoły Wyższej im. ul. Kanonicza 9 31-002 Kraków Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego Itel. (012) 292 74 00, 433 99 00 e-mail: [email protected] Rada Wydawnicza Klemens Budzowski Zbigniew Maciąg Jacek M. Majchrowski Rada Programowa Mieczysław Bieniek, Stanisław Dawidziuk, Bogdan Klich, Jerzy Konieczny, Mirosław Kwieciński, Sławomir Mazur, Andrzej Pepłoński, Jan Widacki, Wiesław Wróblewski (przewodniczący) Redaktor naczelny Klemens Budzowski Sekretarz redakcji Halina Baszak Jaroń Recenzenci prof. dr hab. Leopold Ciborowski prof. KSW dr hab. Jerzy Konieczny prof. KSW dr hab. Mirosław Kwieciński prof. dr hab. Andrzej Furier dr Marcin Lasoń Tłumaczenia język rosyjski: Oleg Aleksejczuk język angielski: Piotr Krasnowolski Redakcja nie zwraca m ateriałów niezamówionych. Projekt okładki i stron tytułowych Decyzja o opublikowaniu tekstu uzależniona jest od Joanna Sroka opinii redakcji i recenzentów. Redakcja zastrzega sobie prawo modyfikowania tytułów i skracania tekstów Łamanie przeznaczonych do druku. A rtykuty powinny być przesyłane w dwóch egzemplarzach wraz z wersjq Joanna Sroka elektroniczną. Adiustacja i korekta redakcyjna Na zlecenie Kamila Zimnicka-Warchoł Krakowskiej Szkoty Wyższej im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego Katarzyna Machała (teksty w języku angielskim) www.ksw.edu.pl Wydawca Krakowskie Towarzystwo Edukacyjne sp. z o.o. - Copyright© -
Germany: Baffled Hegemon Constanze Stelzenmüller
POLICY BRIEF Germany: Baffled hegemon Constanze Stelzenmüller Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, Germany has transformed into a hegemonic power in Europe, but recent global upheaval will test the country’s leadership and the strength of its democracy. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY are challenging Europe’s cohesion aggressively, as does the Trump administration’s “America First” The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 turned reunified policy. The impact of this on Germany is stark. No Germany into Europe’s hegemon. But with signs of country in Europe is affected so dramatically by this a major global downturn on the horizon, Germany new systemic competition. Far from being a “shaper again finds itself at the fulcrum of great power nation,” Germany risks being shaped: by events, competition and ideological struggle in Europe. And competitors, challengers, and adversaries. German democracy is being challenged as never before, by internal and external adversaries. Germany’s options are limited. It needs to preserve Europe’s vulnerable ecosystem in its own The greatest political challenge to liberal democracy enlightened self-interest. It will have to compromise within Germany today is the Alternative für on some issues (defense expenditures, trade Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, or AfD), the surpluses, energy policy). But it will also have to first far-right party in the country’s postwar history push back against Russian or Chinese interference, to be represented in all states and in the federal and make common cause with fellow liberal legislature. While it polls nationally at 12 percent, its democracies. With regard to Trump’s America, disruptive impact has been real. -
Introduction
Introduction Cornelius Torp and Sven Oliver Müller I What sort of structure was the German state of 1871? What sort of powers and phenomena dominated it? What sort of potential for development did it possess? What inheritance did it leave behind? How did it shape the future course of German history? These questions have been at the heart of numerous historical controversies, in the course of which our understanding of Imperial Germany has fundamentally changed. Modern historical research on the German Empire was shaped by two important developments.1 The first was the Fischer controversy at the beginning of the 1960s, which put the question of the continuity of an aggressive German foreign policy from the First to the Second World War onto the agenda, thus providing one of the key impulses for research into the period before 1918.2 The second was a complex upheaval at almost exactly the same time in the historiography of modern Germany in which a particular interpretation of German history before World War I played a central role. The advocates of this interpretation immediately referred to it as a “paradigm change,” a concept then in fashion.3 Indeed, surprisingly quickly, a group of young historians were able to establish across a broad front a new interpretation of modern German history, which broke in many respects with old traditions. In their methodology, the representatives of the so-called “historical social science” (Historische Sozialwissenschaft) turned with verve against the interpretation which had dominated mainstream historiography up till then, which saw the dominant, most important historical actions and actors in politics and the state. -
UID 1987 Nr. 12, Union in Deutschland
CDU-Informationsdienst Union in Deutschland Bonn, den 2. April 1987 12/87 Heiner Geißler: Brandts Rücktritt ist der Ausdruck einer Führung^ und Programmkrise der SPD % Brandts Rücktritt ist die logische Konse- silt1^ aus der Zerstrittenheit und Richtungslo- HEUTE AKTUELL . gkeit der deutschen Sozialdemokratie. Wegen I .res Anpassungskurses gegenüber den Grünen SBrandt und der SPD nicnt • Debatte zur Dnr - gelungen, eine Regierungserklärung j "tische Alternative in der Opposition aufzu- Unsere Argumente gegen falsche Behauptungen und ,erdlngs ist nicht damit zu rechnen, daß die deut- Tatsachenverdrehungen von s SPD und Grünen, 2u . Sozialdemokraten nach dem Rücktritt Brandts ab Seite 3 . einem Kurs der Konsolidierung finden und einen le Zur Regierungserklärung des dJ rparteilichen Klärungsprozeß herbeiführen wer- pro rarnmat sc Bundeskanzlers gibt es ein M h 8 i hen Aussagen des SPD- „CDU-extra" und eine Bro- Sch heitsflügels um 0skar Lafontaine, Gerhard schüre. undr0der' Erhard EpP'er und Hans-Ulrich Klose Seite 37 . d die personellen Weichenstellungen der letzten ^onate lassen nicht erwarten, daß die SPD den • Öffentlichkeitsarbeit e8 zurück zur Volkspartei des Godesberger Pro- Am 19. April 1967 starb Konrad Adenauer. Aus diesem Anlaß ems finden wird. möchten wir den CDU-Verbän- * Ende der Ära Brandt befindet sich die SPD in den einige Anregungen geben. j em Zustand der Zerrüttung und des Niedergangs. Seite 38/39 6reSSe einer funktionsfani en muR 8 Demokratie • Register '86 sichr 6 SPD Jetzt inre Kräfte darauf konzentrieren, Das Stichwortregister — ein un- tis h'11 der °PP°sition personell und programma- ZU re e entbehrlicher Helfer für alle z£ 8 nerieren. Dieser Prozeß braucht viel UiD-Leser. -
Continuity Within Change: the German-American Foreign and Security Relationship During President Clinton’S First Term”
“Continuity within Change: The German-American Foreign and Security Relationship during President Clinton’s First Term” Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Dr. phil. bei dem Fachbereich Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Thorsten Klaßen Berlin 2008 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Eberhard Sandschneider Zweitgutachter: Priv.-Doz. Dr. Peter Rudolf Datum der Disputation: 10.12.2008 2 Table of Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 A Note on Sources .................................................................................................................... 12 I. The United States After the End of the Cold War ................................................................ 13 I.1. Looking for the Next Paradigm: Theoretical Considerations in the 1990s.................... 13 I.1.1 The End of History ................................................................................................... 13 I.1.2 The Clash of Civilizations ....................................................................................... 15 I.1.3 Bipolar, Multipolar, Unipolar? ................................................................................ 17 I.2. The U.S. Strategic Debate ............................................................................................. -
Anti-Terrorist" Police Operation Ends in Scandal
CL 17 GERMANY "ANTI-TERRORIST" POLICE OPERATION ENDS IN SCANDAL A large scale operation of German security forces aiming at the arrest of two alleged members of the "Red Army Faction (RAF) is causing disarray and scandal in Germany. As we are writing this, both the German Interior Minister, Rudolf Seiters, and the Federal Prosecutor General, Alexander von Stahl, have resigned and the dissolution of the famed GSG-9, a special anti-terrorist unit comparable to the British SAS is discussed. "High noon" in Bad Kleinen Not even two weeks after the dramatic shoot-out that lead to the death of an alleged terrorist and a policeman, were the responsible authorities able or willing to present a tenable account of what really happened on Sunday, June 30 in the little East German town of Bad Kleinen. An uninterrupted flow of contradictory official statements and media revelations is constantly adding to the general disarray and the German weekly "Der Spiegel" is already predicting a "state crisis". So far, only the following facts appear to be established: On June 30, two alleged members of the "RAF", Wolfgang Grams and Birgit Hogefeld, met in a restaurant near the train station of Klein-Baden in the east German region of Mecklenburg. According to some sources, a third man called "Klaus", - possibly an under-cover agent took part in the meeting as well. When Grams and Hogefeld left the restaurant, they ran strait into a police trap. More than 50 police officers belonging to the GSG-9, the BKA (Federal Office of Criminal Investigation) and another special unit, the "Grenzschutz-Sicherungsgruppe Bonn", had encircled the site. -
German Jewish Refugees in the United States and Relationships to Germany, 1938-1988
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO “Germany on Their Minds”? German Jewish Refugees in the United States and Relationships to Germany, 1938-1988 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Anne Clara Schenderlein Committee in charge: Professor Frank Biess, Co-Chair Professor Deborah Hertz, Co-Chair Professor Luis Alvarez Professor Hasia Diner Professor Amelia Glaser Professor Patrick H. Patterson 2014 Copyright Anne Clara Schenderlein, 2014 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Anne Clara Schenderlein is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically. _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair _____________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair University of California, San Diego 2014 iii Dedication To my Mother and the Memory of my Father iv Table of Contents Signature Page ..................................................................................................................iii Dedication ..........................................................................................................................iv Table of Contents ...............................................................................................................v -
1 European/American Relations Over the S.D.I
1 EUROPEAN/AMERICAN RELATIONS OVER THE S.D.I. CHARLES J. BALL Submitted for the Ph.D. Degree London School of Economics University of London July 1991 UMI Number: U042872 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Disscrrlation Publishing UMI U042872 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I H F POLITICAL W o A o. tOMlC^ yâ.\\L\Z<S\-yi ABSTRACT This thesis examines the dispute that arose between the United States and key European members of NATO (Britain, West Germany and France) over the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). The debate is traced from its inception on March 23, 1983, when Reagan announced his decision to accelerate ballistic missile defence research, to the eclipse of SDI as a major source of transatlantic and international controversy when Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev signed the INF Treaty in December 1987. The transatlantic SDI debate is investigated to determine: (1) the underlying cause, or reasons, for the controversy, (2) how the Alliance managed the differences which arose, and (3) how East- West relations affected the manner in which the controversy was handled. -
Zur Kontinuität Des Groß- Und Weltmachtstrebens Der Deutschen Marineführung
Dokumentation Gerhard Schreiber Zur Kontinuität des Groß- und Weltmachtstrebens der deutschen Marineführung Kontinuität als geschichtswissenschaftliche Kategorie fragt zum einen, ob und wann ein historisches Kontinuum möglich ist, und sie beschreibt zum anderen — allgemein gesehen — eine geschichtliche Einheit, die auf der weitgehenden Identität der Mo- mente beruht, die in einem zeitlichen Längsschnitt zueinander in Beziehung gesetzt werden. Mit Kontinuität ist somit weder Kausalität noch Determiniertheit der histori- schen Entwicklung gemeint, sondern die Ähnlichkeit und die Erklärbarkeit des Späte- ren mit dem Früheren1. Mit einem derartigen Vorverständnis stellt die vorliegende Dokumentation die Frage nach der Sichselbstgleichheit der Machtpolitik im preußisch-deutschen Nationalstaat, dem Deutschen Reich zwischen 1871 und dem Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges2. Das eigentliche Untersuchungsfeld soll dabei — quasi idealtypisch — auf eine konservative Führungselite, die Marineführung3, eingeengt werden. Zur Diskussion steht die These, daß es zwischen den imperialistischen Zielsetzungen der Marine, wie sie späte- stens mit dem Beginn des Großflottenbaus zutage traten, und den Überlegungen zu einer deutschen Weltvorherrschaft, die im Dritten Reich in diesem Wehrmachtteil an- gestellt wurden, eine ungebrochene machtpolitische Kontinuität gab. Die dem spezifi- schen Denksystem der Marineführung immanente ideologische Kohärenz konkreti- sierte sich in diesem Zusammenhang vor 1918, vor 1933 und bis 1945 in der einem ri- gorosen Navalismus oder -
Zwischen "Luxemburgismus" Und "Stalinismus"
Nationaler Sozialismus in Österreich vor 1918 359 tschechoslowakischen und polnischen Sektion. Die hauptsächliche Tätigkeit der Nationalsozialisten - wie sie nunmehr im modernen Wortsinne bezeichnet werden können - in Österreich, der Tschechoslowakei und Polen während der frühen 20er Jahre bestand in der Agitation für den Anschluß und in der Propaganda und Organisationstätigkeit für die Bildung einer einflußreichen politischen Massen bewegung. 1923 strebte ein Flügel der Partei ihre vollständige Unterordnung unter Hitler an; 1926 stimmte die Mehrheit auf einer Konferenz der österreichischen Parteiführer, die in München und bezeichnenderweise unter Hitlers Vorsitz statt fand, für die unbedingte persönliche Führerschaft Hitlers und für sein 25-Punkte- Programm, wie das die deutsche Partei 1925 getan hatte. Seitdem war der öster reichische Nationalsozialismus auf das engste mit der Person Hitlers verknüpft, und er wurde häufig einfach „Hitlerbewegung" genannt. SIEGFRIED BAHNE ZWISCHEN „LUXEMBURGISMUS" UND „STALINISMUS" Die „ultralinke" Opposition in der KPD In den ersten Jahren nach der Gründung des Sowjetstaates hatten die bolsche wistischen Führer auf den baldigen Sieg der „proletarischen Revolution" in Mittel- und Westeuropa gehofft1. Die Niederlagen der deutschen und bulgarischen kommunistischen Parteien im Jahre 1923 zeigten jedoch das Ende der revolutio nären Periode in Europa nach dem ersten Weltkrieg an2; es folgten die ruhigeren Jahre bis zum Beginn der Weltwirtschaftskrise, von den Kommunisten als Periode der „relativen Stabilisierung des Kapitalismus" bezeichnet. Die geänderte Situation bedingte eine Überprüfung der kommunistischen „Strategie"3. Gerade in dieser Zeit aber wurde die kommunistische Bewegung ihres wichtigsten Führers beraubt. Nach dem Tode Lenins erschütterten die Kämpfe um seine Nachfolge und um die 1 Vgl. z. B. W. I. Lenin, Ausgew. Werke, Bd. -
Considering the Creation of a Domestic Intelligence Agency in the United States
HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM and the INTELLIGENCE POLICY CENTER THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Homeland Security Program RAND Intelligence Policy Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity.