DOCSLIB.ORG

Conformity Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conformity Analysis CONFORMITY ANALYSIS TO BE ADOPTED FEBURARY 2020 DEVELOPED AS PART OF THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS’: 2020 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY AND AMENDMENT #18 TO THE 2019-22 METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SACOG STAFF Renée DeVere-Oki, Program Manager for Regional Air Quality Planning Shengyi Gao, Data and Modeling Analyst José Luis Cáceres, Project Manager-2019/22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program Matt Carpenter, Director of Transportation Services Bruce Griesenbeck, Data and Analysis Manager Clint Holtzen, Planning Manager ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Conformity Requirements 1 Conformity Tests 2 Findings of the Conformity Analysis 2 Conformity Determination for the 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy Amendment #2 and the 2019-22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program 4 Overview of the Physical Environment 4 Introduction 5 Background 5 Conformity Approach 6 Financial Constraint 6 Inclusion of all Federal and Regionally Significant Projects 7 Latest Planning Assumptions 7 Land Use Assumptions 7 Transportation System 8 Latest Emissions Model 8 Modeling Documentation 9 Air Quality Emissions Analysis 10 Years of Analysis 10 Analysis Techniques 11 Emission Calculations 12 Emissions Budget Test for Ozone (ROG and NOx) 12 Emission Forecasts for the Sutter Buttes Ozone Nonattainment Area 12 Emissions Budget Test for PM10 13 Interim Baseline Test for the Sacramento PM2.5 Nonattainment Area 13 Emissions Budget Test for the Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Nonattainment Area 13 Implementation of Transportation Control Measures 13 Public Participation Process 14 Resolution of Approval for the 2016 MTP/SCS Amendment #2 and the 2019-22 MTIP 14 Conclusion 14 iii APPENDICES Appendix A: Conformity Checklist Appendix B: Transportation Project Listing Non-Exempt Project Listing Exempt Project Listing Eastern Solano County Project Listing Appendix C: Conformity Analysis Documentation Figure 1-Air Quality Conformity Geographies by Nonattainment Area Table 1-SACOG Air Quality Conformity Emissions Analysis Table 2-Population and Employment Assumptions, and VMT Estimates Table 3-Emission Estimates for Ozone Conformity Analysis Table 4a and 4b- Ozone Conformity Analysis (options based upon budget approval) Table 5a-PM10 Emissions Estimates and Conformity Test Table 5b-Paved Dust Calculation Table 5c-Road Construction Dust Emission Rates Table 5d-Road Construction Dust Seasonal (Winter) Table 6a- PM2.5 Emissions Estimates and Conformity Test Table 6b- PM2.5 Conformity Analysis for Yuba City‐Marysville Area Table 7-Air Quality Conformity Assumptions Appendix D: Timely Implementation Documentation for Transportation Control Measures Appendix E: Charge of the RPP Appendix F: Resolution of Adoption and Public Notice Resolution of Adoption Public Notice Appendix G: Response to Public Comments iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Agency for the Sacramento Region and is responsible for all regional transportation planning activities in Sacramento, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba Counties, and in El Dorado and Placer Counties outside of the Tahoe Basin. For purposes of conformity, SACOG is responsible for the analysis of transportation activities in that area and in eastern Solano County. Presented in this report is the Conformity Analysis for the 2020 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy Amendment (2020 MTP/SCS) and Amendment #18 to the 2019-22 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). The conformity demonstration requirement is described in the Clean Air Act Section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) transportation conformity regulations (40 CFR 93 Subpart A). Transportation conformity ("conformity") is a way to ensure that Federal funding and approval goes to those transportation activities that are consistent with air quality goals set for ozone, particulate matter, or nitrogen dioxide. The analysis presented in this report demonstrates that the 2020 MTP/SCS meets the criteria specified in these regulations. CONFORMITY REQUIREMENTS Conformity must be demonstrated in “all nonattainment and maintenance areas for transportation-related pollutants for which the area is designated nonattainment or has a maintenance plan” (40 CFR 93.102). The following are the designations within the Sacramento region: • 2008 8-Hour Ozone (including the ROG and NOx precursors) Severe-15 Nonattainment Area: o The Sacramento Metropolitan Area (Sacramento, Yolo and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Solano Counties) and o The Sutter Buttes Area (Sutter County). The 2008 ozone standards classify the Sutter Buttes Area as an unclassified/attainment area for ozone, effective July 20, 2013. • 2015 8-Hour Ozone (including the ROG and NOx precursors) Moderate Nonattainment Area: o The Sacramento Metropolitan Area (Sacramento, Yolo and portions of El Dorado, Placer, Sutter, Solano Counties). o The Sutter Buttes Area (Sutter County). The 2015 ozone standards classify the Sutter Buttes Area as a marginal nonattainment area for ozone, effective June 4, 2018. • Particulate Matter (PM10) Maintenance Area (Sacramento County) • 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Nonattainment Area and Maintenance Area: o Nonattainment Area - Sacramento Area (Sacramento and portions of Yolo, Solano, Placer and El Dorado Counties) o Maintenance Area -Yuba City-Marysville Area (Sutter and a portion of Yuba County) Under a determination of conformity, the following criteria are applied: 1. The latest planning assumptions and emission models are used. 2. The transportation plan and program pass an emissions budget test using a budget that has been found adequate or been approved by EPA or an interim emissions test where budgets have not been established. 1 3. The transportation plan and program provide for the timely implementation of transportation control measures (TCMs). 4. Interagency and public consultation is part of the process. SACOG follows the interagency review process described in SACOG’s Public Participation Plan. The dedicated interagency forum for this process is the bi-monthly Regional Planning Partnership meeting. Upon reaching a determination finding that is approved by SACOG’s Board, the conformity analysis is submitted to Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) for final approval. The Conformity Checklist developed by FHWA contains items required for completing a determination. This list is included for reference in Appendix A. CONFORMITY TESTS Federal conformity regulations describe two types of tests; an emissions budget test and an interim emissions test. To run an emissions budget test, a region must have budgets in place that have been found adequate for transportation conformity purposes, or are contained in an approved air quality implementation plan. Predicted emissions for the 2020 MTP/SCS must be less than or equal to these budgets. The second test, an interim emissions test is used when approved or adequate budgets are not in place and the region is in nonattainment. Predicted emissions for the 2020 MTP/SCS and MTIP must be less than or equal to emissions predicted in the baseline scenario. Applicable air quality implementation plans and conformity tests are further described within the text. FINDINGS OF THE CONFORMITY ANALYSIS A regional emissions analysis was conducted for the years 2020, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2026, 2027, 2035, and 2040 for each applicable pollutant. See Appendix C, Table 1, for the analysis years for each pollutant. Each analysis utilized the latest planning assumptions and emissions models. The conclusions of the SACOG analysis are: • Ozone: The Analysis determined that the implementation of the 2020 MTP/SCS and the MTIP would result in less total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions (ROG and NOx) than the emissions budget found adequate by the EPA in the 2009 Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan, 2013 SIP Revisions. This analysis has used these budgets for demonstration of the 2008 and 2015 standards; and the 1997 standard as necessary. This draft contains both approved and pending approval Ozone budgets. At the time of adoption, the analysis, the approved budgets will be used. • PM10: The Analysis determined that the implementation of the 2020 MTP/SCS and the MTIP would result in less total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions than the emissions budget found adequate by the EPA in the 2010 PM10 Implementation/Maintenance Plan and Re-designation Request for Sacramento County. • PM2.5: The Analysis determined that the total regional on-road vehicle-related emissions associated with implementation of the 2020 MTP/SCS and the MTIP for the analysis years are projected to be less than or equal to the emissions for the Baseline scenario, satisfying the test established in Interim Transportation Conformity Guidance for 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS Nonattainment Areas in the Sacramento area. The Analysis also found that implementation of the 2020 MTP/SCS and the MTIP would result in less total regional on- 2 road vehicle-related emissions than the emissions budgets found adequate by the EPA in the 2014 Yuba City-Marysville PM2.5 Maintenance Plan and Re-designation Request. • TCMs: The implementation of the 2020 MTP/SCS and the MTIP will not impede the timely implementation of the TCMs identified in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Teleconference Board Meeting
    Chair, Christina Fugazi, City of Stockton Commissioner, Nancy Young, City of Tracy Vice Chair, Leo Zuber, City of Ripon Commissioner, Kathy Miller, San Joaquin County Commissioner, Jose Nuño, City of Manteca Commissioner, Melissa Hernandez, Alameda County Commissioner, Lily Mei, City of Fremont Commissioner, Mikey Hothi, City of Lodi Executive Director, Stacey Mortensen SAN JOAQUIN REGIONAL RAIL COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING June 4, 2021 – 8:00 am Call-In Information: +1 (646) 749-3122 Access Code: 185-391-325 GoToMeeting Link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/185391325 SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference or videoconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing +1 (646) 749- 3122 with access code: 185-391-325 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/185391325 Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJRRC staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJRRC staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period. Emailed public comments should be limited to approximately 240 words as comments will be limited to two (2) minutes per comment.
    [Show full text]
  • RPP Packet Attachments
    Sacramento Area 1415 L Street, tel: 916.321.9000 Suite 300 fax: 916.321.9551 Council of Sacramento, CA tdd: 916.321.9550 Governments 95814 www.sacog.org Regional Planning Partnership Wednesday, October 23, 2019, 2:00 to 3:30 p.m. SACOG Rivers Room, 1415 L Street, Suite 300, Sacramento, CA Meeting Information: https://www.gotomeet.me/GoToMeetingSACOG1 You can also dial in using your phone: Dial-in #: 877-568-4106 Access Code: 732-591-877 The purpose of the Partnership is to assist SACOG with its transportation and air quality planning and programming processes, with an emphasis on technical issues, by providing consultation with a broad range of public and private constituencies. It also provides a forum for local agencies in the region’s transportation and land use industry to contribute to the policy-making and fund programming activities of SACOG, and to improve coordination within the region. The Regional Planning Partnership (RPP) consists of the five local air districts, representatives of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), California Air Resources Board (ARB), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and state and local transportation agencies. The RPP meets bimonthly. Each RPP meeting is open to the public and held at the SACOG offices. 1. Introductions (Renée DeVere-Oki, 5 minutes) o Welcome o What is the RPP? o Introductions in room, phone, computer. Please enter your name upon logging in. 2. The SACOG Regional Agencies Partnership Update o Updates from Staff (12 minutes) . Topics in Transit – (Barbara VaughanBechtold, 5 minutes) Update on any current topics in transit and SACOG’s Transit Coordinating Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority Agenda March 24, 2017
    Supervisor Vito Chiesa, Chair, Stanislaus County Alternate Richard O’Brien, City of Riverbank Councilmember Don Tatzin, Vice-Chair, City of Lafayette Alternate Federal Glover, Contra Costa County Councilmember Patrick Hume, Vice-Chair, City of Elk Grove Alternate Don Nottoli, Sacramento County Supervisor Rodrigo Espinoza, Merced County Alternate Mike Villalta, City of Los Banos Supervisor Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Alternate Tom Blalock, BART Councilmember Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Alternate Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Supervisor Doug Verboon, Kings County Alternate Justin Mendes, City of Hanford Supervisor Brett Frazier, Madera County Alternate Andrew Madellin, City of Madera Supervisor Sal Quintero, Fresno County Alternate Michael Derr, City of Selma Supervisor Amy Shuklian, Tulare County Alternate Bob Link, City of Visalia AGENDA March 24, 2017 – 1:30 PM Stanislaus County Board of Supervisors Chambers 1010 10th Street (Basement), Modesto CA This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at 209-944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Authority are conducted in English. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Authority regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the offices of the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission located at 949 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Rail Sacramento Extension
    NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Valley Rail Sacramento Extension PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD: MARCH 31, 2020 – MAY 15, 2020 DATE: March 31, 2020 TO: Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies, and Other Interested Parties FROM: San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission SUBJECT: Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Valley Rail Sacramento Extension Project (SCH #2019090306) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission (SJRRC), acting as lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Valley Rail Sacramento Extension Project (proposed project). A. Valley Rail Sacramento Extension Location and Limits SJRRC is the designated owner, operator, and policy-making body for Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) service, which currently provides commuter rail service between San Jose and Stockton. The existing 86- mile ACE service corridor passes through Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Joaquin Counties, with 10 stations along the route. At the western end of the ACE corridor, ACE operates on an approximately 4-mile segment of track between San Jose and Santa Clara owned and operated by the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB, also referred to as Caltrain). North of the Santa Clara Station to Stockton, ACE operates on approximately 82 miles of track owned by Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). ACE operates on portions of UPRR’s Coast, Niles, Oakland, and Fresno Subdivisions. The San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority (SJJPA) is the designated administrator and manager of the San Joaquins passenger rail service, which currently provides intercity rail service between Oakland, Sacramento and Bakersfield.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-26-17 Joint Powers Authority Agenda
    Supervisor Vito Chiesa, Chair, Stanislaus County Alternate Richard O’Brien, City of Riverbank Councilmember Don Tatzin, Vice-Chair, City of Lafayette Alternate Federal Glover, Contra Costa County Councilmember Patrick Hume, Vice-Chair, City of Elk Grove Alternate Don Nottoli, Sacramento County Supervisor Rodrigo Espinoza, Merced County Alternate Mike Villalta, City of Los Banos Supervisor Scott Haggerty, Alameda County Alternate Tom Blalock, BART Councilmember Bob Johnson, City of Lodi Alternate Bob Elliott, San Joaquin County Supervisor Doug Verboon, Kings County Alternate Justin Mendes, City of Hanford Supervisor Brett Frazier, Madera County Alternate Andrew Medellin, City of Madera Supervisor Sal Quintero, Fresno County Alternate Michael Derr, City of Selma Supervisor Amy Shuklian, Tulare County Alternate Bob Link, City of Visalia AGENDA May 26, 2017 – 1:00 PM Fresno County Board of Supervisors Chambers 2281 Tulare Street, Fresno CA San Joaquin Joint Powers Sacramento County Authority Administration Building 36437 East Ridge Road 949 East Channel Street 700 H Street, Suite 2450 Sea Ranch, CA 95497 Stockton, CA 95202 Sacramento, CA 95814 This Agenda shall be made available upon request in alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. § 12132) and the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code § 54954.2). Persons requesting a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting should contact San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission staff, at 209-944-6220, during regular business hours, at least twenty-four hours prior to the time of the meeting. All proceedings before the Authority are conducted in English.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-21-21 SJJPA Agenda Packet
    Supervisor Vito Chiesa, Stanislaus County Alternate Richard O’Brien, City of Riverbank Councilmember Patrick Hume, Chair, City of Elk Grove Alternate Don Nottoli, Sacramento County Supervisor David Haubert, Alameda County Alternate Melissa Hernandez, City of Dublin Councilmember David Hudson, City of San Ramon Alternate Diane Burgis, Contra Costa County Supervisor Rodrigo Espinoza, Vice-Chair, Merced County Supervisor Kathy Miller, San Joaquin County Alternate Mikey Hothi, City of Lodi Supervisor Doug Verboon, Kings County Supervisor Brett Frazier, Vice-Chair, Madera County Alternate Tom Wheeler, Madera County Supervisor Sal Quintero, Fresno County Alternate Rey León, City of Huron Supervisor Amy Shuklian, Tulare County Alternate Eddie Valero, Tulare County TELECONFERENCE BOARD MEETING May 21, 2021 – 9:00 AM Call-In Information: +1 (224) 501-3412 Conference Access Code: 308-755-469 GoToMeeting Link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/476148605 SPECIAL NOTICE Coronavirus COVID-19 In accordance with the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20, N-29-20 and N-35-20, San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority Board Members will be attending this meeting via teleconference or videoconference. Members of the public may observe the meeting by dialing +1 (224) 501-3412 with access code: 308-755-469 or log-in using a computer, tablet or smartphone at GoToMeeting.com using link: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/476148605. Please note that all members of the public will be placed on mute until such times allow for public comments to be made. If a person wishes to make a public comment during the meeting, to do so they must either 1) use GoToMeeting and will have the option to notify SJJPA staff by alerting them via the “Chat” function or they can 2) contact SJJPA staff via email at [email protected] in which staff will read the comment aloud during the public comment period.
    [Show full text]
  • Modal Discussion
    Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy A P P E N D I X L M O D A L D I S C U S S I O N Page intentionally left blank MODAL DISCUSSION INTRODUCTION This appendix of the 2018 RTP describes the investment strategy for the San Joaquin region. It discusses planned future projects and transportation management strategies intended to most effectively accommodate future transportation needs. The investment strategy is a balanced approach to modal development intended to fulfill the objectives and performance indicators which guide the RTP and move towards achievement of the long-term transportation goals for the region. This includes the provision of appropriate resources to operate and maintain the multi-modal system. The 2018 Regional Transportation Plan promotes a “balanced” transportation system. It calls for significant investment and system expansion of alternative transportation modes while adding some capacity and operational improvements to the existing highway and arterial roadway network. The investment strategy identifies enough funding over the life of the RTP to develop and construct or implement the 2018 RTP improvements. There continues to be on-going dialogue with all stakeholders to improve our understanding of how the transportation system impacts the quality of life in San Joaquin County. The participation process has shed light on important values such as mobility choice and accessibility, travel time reliability, cost effectiveness, and environmental sensitivity. The planning process is iterative. System-wide performance indicators were developed and used to help policy makers and the community at large evaluate tradeoffs between alternative packages of transportation improvements. The performance indicators are also used as a tool to help evaluate how this RTP contributes to the quality of life in the San Joaquin region.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    October 20, 2017 Meeting San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee 1. Introductions Steve Cohn, Chair San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee 2. Public Comment Steve Cohn, Chair San Joaquin Valley Rail Committee 3. Amtrak San Joaquins Operations Update Daniel Krause SAN JOAQUINS ON-TIME PERFORMANCE On-Time Performance FY12 – FY16 100.0% 90.0% 88.1% 84.0% 80.0% 77.7% 75.4% 76.5% 73.6% 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 SAN JOAQUINS ON-TIME PERFORMANCE On-Time Performance FY17 100.00% 88.70% 90.00% 85.70% 81.20% 80.70% 79.50% 81.00% 78.60% 80.00% 77.90% 71.20% 70.00% 65.70% 66.30% 61.40% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% SAN JOAQUINS RIDERSHIP Ridership Ticket Revenue Month FY17 FY16 % Chg. FY17 FY16 % Chg. Oct 87,454 90,961 -3.9 $2,769,402 $2,756,890 +0.5 Nov 101,672 102,915 -1.2 $3,538,396 $3,609,485 -2.0 Dec 98,053 97,530 +0.5 $3,378,587 $3,415,503 -1.1 Jan 82,707 82,475 +0.3 $2,608,201 $2,643,805 -1.3 Feb 76,288 80,868 -5.7 $2,253,335 $2,424,039 -7.0 Mar 92,019 97,167 -5.3 $2,906,099 $3,118,374 -6.8 Apr 102,440 84,968 +20.6 $3,097,819 $2,529,587 +22.5 May 95,894 96,630 -0.8 $2,961,079 $2,904,982 +1.9 Jun 98,158 97,844 +0.3 $3,088,761 $3,032,447 +1.9 Jul 104,088 107,120 -2.8 $3,317,878 $3,327,313 -0.3 Aug 95,909 94,932 +1.0 $3,050,003 $3,004,462 +1.5 Sep 85,355 88,891 -4.0 $2,733,361 $2,818,684 -3.0 YTD 1,120,037 1,122,301 -0.2 $35,702,920 $35,585,570 +0.3 SAN JOAQUINS RIDERSHIP FY16 v.
    [Show full text]
  • Vice Mayor Hansen's District 4 Newsletter Apply for Sacramento Youth Commission Seats Before June 30Th!
    Vice Mayor Hansen's District 4 Newsletter June 2018 Apply for Sacramento Youth Commission Seats before June 30th! Mission The Sacramento Youth Commission is a youth led commission/advocacy group whose mission is to protect, preserve, and enhance the quality of life for Sacramento youth by advising the City Council and the public on issues relating to youth policies, programs, and opportunities. Commissioner Qualification Requirements: • Reside or attend school in the City of Sacramento • Between the ages of 14-19 • Possess a desire in improving the lives of youth in Sacramento Benefits: • Provide a unique experience with city governmental procedures. • Gives opportunities to help address Sacramento’s youth. • Offers chances to meet motivated youth from around the city. • Financially compensates time and effort with stipends. Sacramento Youth Commission is recruiting new members. To apply, click here. Sacramento Pride Parade, June 10th Now in its 35th year, Sacramento’s Pride is the preeminent LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer) community event in the region. The 17,000-person festival produced by the Sacramento LGBT Community Center takes place Sunday, June 10, 2018. It is designed as a safe, welcoming, and affirming experience that celebrates diversity and commemorates the Stonewall riots that ignited the modern LGBTQ rights movement. PARADE AND MARCH ON Sunday, June 10th, 2018 at 11am. Parade March starts at 3rd and N Street, ends at 10th and N Street. Emceed by… (stay tuned!), this year’s parade march is going to be a can’t miss part of the celebration! Parade march participants include Blue Shield of California, California Endowment, Kaiser, and much more! Following the parade march, spectators can use the festival entrance on 7th and Capitol Mall.
    [Show full text]
  • 32 5. Short-Term and Longer-Term Capital
    5. SHORT-TERM AND LONGER-TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS A key goal of SJJPA is to build upon the State’s ef- which are discussed in the Longer-Term Capital forts to improve the performance and increase the Improvement Program. Capacity enhancements are frequency of the San Joaquins and expand ridership also currently being evaluated between Stockton and through increased awareness of the service and the Oakland. development of new ridership markets. SJJPA has de- Morning Express Service: This early-morning ser- veloped an aggressive $1.5 billion “Estimated 10-Year vice is currently being implemented from Fresno to Capital Improvement Program” to expand the capac- Sacramento and the Bay Area and is intended to open ity of the San Joaquins Corridor. This chapter details up new markets related to business travel and leisure this program, as well as identifying specific projects in day trips. This program is detailed in the Short-Range SJJPA’s Short-Term and Longer-Term Capital Programs. Capital Program. Additionally, SJJPA is exploring implementing a Morning Express Service Fresno and Estimated 10-Year Capital Improvement Program Bakersfield in the longer-term. In coordination with the State, BNSF, and UPRR, SJJPA New Maintenance and Layover Facilities: To sup- is in the process of implementing its Estimated 10-Year port the 8th and 9th Daily Round-Trips, two layover Capital Improvement Program (see Figure 5.1), which facilities will also be needed as part of the Short-Term will transform the San Joaquins Corridor to one that Capital Improvement Program. To provide additional will not only vastly improve intra-Central Valley and service between Sacramento and Fresno (eventually inter-Central Valley-Bay Area travel, but also performs hourly), a new maintenance facility will be needed as an efficient feeder service to the State’s future as part of the Longer-Term Capital Improvement high-speed rail (HSR) system.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Rail Project Receives Major Grant Funding
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 26, 2018 Contact: Chris Kay, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission: (209) 944-6242 David Lipari, San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority – (209) 944-6278 Local Media Contact: Alison MacLeod, KP Public Affairs – (916) 498-7730 Valley Rail Project Receives Major Grant Funding Today by State – Will Fund Series of New Stations and Track Improvements to Increase Connectivity and Frequency of Passenger Rail Service to Sacramento April 26, 2018, Sacramento, CA – Today the California State Transportation Agency announced a series of grant awards under the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), and selected the Valley Rail Project as a major awardee providing $500,500,000 to fund a series of new stations and track improvements to increase connectivity and frequency of service to the Sacramento region. The Valley Rail Project is a joint proposal by the San Joaquin Joint Powers Authority and the San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission to dramatically improve passenger rail service to the Sacramento region with both Amtrak San Joaquins and Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) service. The Valley Rail project will implement a new transportation vision for serving the Sacramento region with integrated intercity and commuter rail service. The grant funds will help perform track improvements on the existing Union Pacific Railroad Sacramento subdivision freight corridor that runs just east of Interstate 5 to make it usable for passenger service, and build new shared San Joaquins and ACE stations in Lodi, Elk Grove, Sacramento City College, Sacramento Midtown, Old North Sacramento, and Natomas which will include a shuttle connection to the Sacramento International Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • CA Office of Spill Prevention & Response, and CA Public Utilities
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor September 15,2014 Amy Million, Principal Planner Community Development Department 250 East L Street Benicia, CA 94510 [email protected] Ms. Million, The following State of California agencies appreciate this opportunity to comment on the June 2014 Valero Benicia Crude by Rail Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (Valero DEIR):! These comments are submitted by: • California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), Safety and Enforcement Division. • California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR). In summary, for the reasons set forth below, the DEIR likely underestimates the risk posed by the proposed project. Among the issues of concern are the following, discussed in more detail below: 1. The length of track accounted for in the risk analysis is insufficient. 2. Derailment and accident rate calculations are problematic. 3. The cutoff point for analyzing tank car losses is insufficiently supported. 4. The risk analysis does not account for Local Safety Hazard Sites. 5. The legal enforceability of the Valero commitment to use CPC-1232 tank cars is unclear. 6. Total derailments attributable to the project, including those outside California, also should be considered. 7. Insufficient attention is paid to potential consequences. 8. Assumptions regarding the number of cars expected to derail are insufficiently explained. 9. The risk assessment does not include train accidents other than derailments. I Valero Benicia Crude By Rail Project Draft Environmental Impact Report, SCH # 2013052074, Use Permit Application 12PLN-00063, June 2014. Discussion As described in the DEIR, The Project would allow the [Valero Benicia] Refinery to receive crude oil by rail...The crudes would originate at sites in North America.
    [Show full text]