The Revisionist the Revisionist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Revisionist the Revisionist ISSN: 1542-376X TTheTThehhee RevisionistRRevisionistReevviissiioonniisstt JJournalJJournaloouurrnnaall fforfforoorr CCriticalCCriticalrriittiiccaall HHistoricalHHistoricaliissttoorriiccaall IInquiryIInquirynnqquuiirryy Volume 3 • Number 2 • October 2005 On Holocaust Revisionism: Arguments and Implications, p. 133 Gas Chamber Delusions: Dabbling U.S. Historian, p. 133 Y Auschwitz Runs in the Family: Child Survivors, pp. 141, 143 Auschwitz Family Camp, p. 146 The Thousand Year Reich: The Birth of Germany in 843, p. 164 Jewish WWII Demographies: One Exemplary Hungarian Town, p. 173 The Fate of France’s Jews, p. 178 WWII Death Marches: Life-Saving Forced Relocations, p. 182 Cultural Decomposition: Foul Language and Its Promotors, p. 197 The Evil Empire Reviewed: Books on Stalin’s USSR, pp. 201-214 Contents Resurgence ................................................................................................................................................................... 118 By Germar Rudolf On Holocaust Revisionism .......................................................................................................................................... 119 By Paul Grubach The Birkenau Gas Chambers in October of 1941: Technico-Historical Fantasies of a “Technician” ................. 133 By Carlo Mattogno Selection at Auschwitz: Extermination Claims Refuted .......................................................................................... 139 By Jean-Marie Boisdefeu But Why Weren’t the Jewish Children Gassed? ...................................................................................................... 141 By Jean-Marie Boisdefeu Children Who Survived Auschwitz ............................................................................................................................ 143 By Jean-Marie Boisdefeu Contribution to the History of the Family Camp at Birkenau ................................................................................ 146 By Carlo Mattogno The Significance of the Treaty of Verdun and the Emergence of the German Reich ........................................... 164 By Rolf-Josef Eibicht, MA The Effektenkammer in the Camps of NS Germany ................................................................................................. 171 By Paul Amner The Jews of Kaszony ................................................................................................................................................... 173 By Carl O. Nordling What Happened to the 75,000 Jews Deported from France? .................................................................................. 178 By Carl O. Nordling The “Death Marches” that Saved Lives .................................................................................................................... 182 By Angela Schneider What is the Real Racial/Ethnic Agenda of the ADL? ............................................................................................... 184 By Paul Grubach Engineer Fröhlich arrested in Vienna ....................................................................................................................... 186 By Robert Faurisson Ferris Wheel in Auschwitz – Just another Jewish Lie .............................................................................................. 187 By Germar Rudolf Research News ............................................................................................................................................................. 189 From the Records of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, Part 8 ....................................................................................... 189 By Germar Rudolf It’s All Sh.., Isn’t It? .................................................................................................................................................... 197 By Ernst Manon Obituary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 200 Dr. Robert Harvey Countess ...................................................................................................................................... 200 By Germar Rudolf Reviews ......................................................................................................................................................................... 201 Lev Mekhlis: Stalin’s Grand Inquisitor ..................................................................................................................... 201 By Dan Michaels The Court of the Evil Empire ..................................................................................................................................... 205 By Dan Michaels Hitler Spoils Stalin’s Surprise .................................................................................................................................... 211 By Dan Michaels At Long Last: A New Revisionist Standard Work ..................................................................................................... 215 By Daniel McKeon and Patrick McNally The Revisionist · 2005 · Volume 3 · No. 2 117 Germar Rudolf, Resurgence, p. 118. Resurgence By Germar Rudolf The “Date modified” time stamp of the source file to no. 4 of 2004 and all except one of the last published is- this issue shows that I was last working on this issue of sue of The Revisionist (1/2005) have never been posted The Revisionist on October 18, 2005. In the early morn- anywhere. Issue no. 1/2005 has not even been available ing of the following day, my wife and I had an appoint- online as a pdf file. ment at the Chicago office of the U.S. Immigration Ser- I managed to locate the original files on my old (2003) vices in order to have our marriage validated, which was computer (before recycling it), and forwarded them to the supposed to pave the road for my getting a so-called responsible person at CODOH. “green card.” Although we were successful with the mar- While skimming the folders on my old computer, I re- riage validation, my attempt at getting permanent legal alized that the next issue of TR (2/2005), although still a residence in the U.S. based on this was somewhat ill- good deal from being finished, had progressed quite im- fated, to put it mildly. Only a few seconds after my wife pressively by the time of my arrest. It was probably only and I received the fancy document validating our mar- a week or two away from being published. Hence I decid- riage, I got arrested under the false pretense of having ed to send that issue to CODOH as well (with these intro- missed an alleged interview appointment several months ductory comments) in order that the individual papers of earlier. After having spent four weeks in deportation cus- that forgotten issue might be published at long last. tody in the Kenosha County Jail, I was deported to Ger- There is even a number of papers ready for Issue no. 3 many on Nov. 14, 2005, where I disappeared into a num- of 2005. If they still haven’t been published elsewhere, it ber of government accommodation facilities for the fol- has to be determined what will happen with them. Maybe lowing 44 more months. Details of this ordeal can be InconvenientHistory.com may feature some of them. gleaned from my website at www.GermarRudolf.com. Although this late appearance of Issue no. 2 of 2005 The Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust may look like The Revisionist has suddenly come back to (CODOH) has approached me with the intention to post life, it actually hasn’t. This is the mere resurgence of one all papers ever published in this journal on their website. single issue that in 2005 was on the brink of seeing the Since most of the papers have been posted for years on light of day. Now, after seven years, it finally does. I vho.org/tr, their plan merely required to mirror these files hope you enjoy reading the individual papers. (after some reformatting). But some papers of the issue 118 The Revisionist · 2005 · Volume 3 · No. 2 Paul Grubach, On Holocaust Revisionism, pp. 119-132. On Holocaust Revisionism Basic Arguments and Political Implications By Paul Grubach The traditional view of the fate of European Jewry during World War II, commonly known as the Holo- caust, contains the following propositions: there was a Nazi plan to exterminate all the Jews; homicidal gas chambers were used to implement this plan; and approximately 6,000,000 were murdered. Holocaust revisionists do not deny that atrocities were committed against Jews during World War II. However, they contend there was no Nazi plan to exterminate world Jewry; the “Final Solution” was no more, no less than their expulsion from Europe. The Nazis did incarcerate Jews in concentration camps, but there were no gas chambers for mass murder in them. And finally, the claim of 6,000,000 murdered Jews is an irresponsible exaggeration, as the number killed or who died otherwise was far less. Most Holocaust skeptics do admit that large numbers of Jews were shot by the German army during their campaign to stamp out anti-German guerilla warfare and communism on the Eastern Front. Certainly, many more were killed in anti-Jewish pogroms in Nazi-occupied areas. And finally, many Jews did die of starva- tion, disease, and exhaustion as a result of Nazi forced-labor policies. The revisionist estimates of the total number of Jewish deaths from all causes ranges from 300,000 to 1,500,000. Is There Proof for the Traditional View
Recommended publications
  • Déportés À Auschwitz. Certains Résis- Tion D’Une Centaine, Sont Traqués Et Tent Avec Des Armes
    MORT1943 ET RÉSISTANCE BIEN QU’AYANT rarement connu les noms de leurs victimes juives, les nazis entendaient que ni Zivia Lubetkin, ni Richard Glazar, ni Thomas Blatt ne survivent à la « solution finale ». Ils survécurent cependant et, après la Shoah, chacun écrivit un livre sur la Résistance en 1943. Quelque 400 000 Juifs vivaient dans le ghetto de Varsovie surpeuplé, mais les épi- démies, la famine et les déportations à Treblinka – 300 000 personnes entre juillet et septembre 1942 – réduisirent considérablement ce nombre. Estimant que 40 000 Juifs s’y trouvaient encore (le chiffre réel approchait les 55 000), Heinrich Himmler, le chef des SS, ordonna la déportation de 8 000 autres lors de sa visite du ghetto, le 9 janvier 1943. Cependant, sous la direction de Mordekhaï Anielewicz, âgé de 23 ans, le Zydowska Organizacja Bojowa (ZOB, Organisation juive de combat) lança une résistance armée lorsque les Allemands exécutèrent l’ordre d’Himmler, le 18 janvier. Bien que plus de 5 000 Juifs aient été déportés le 22 janvier, la Résistance juive – elle impliquait aussi bien la recherche de caches et le refus de s’enregistrer que la lutte violente – empêcha de remplir le quota et conduisit les Allemands à mettre fin à l’Aktion. Le répit, cependant, fut de courte durée. En janvier, Zivia Lubetkin participa à la création de l’Organisation juive de com- bat et au soulèvement du ghetto de Varsovie. « Nous combattions avec des gre- nades, des fusils, des barres de fer et des ampoules remplies d’acide sulfurique », rapporte-t-elle dans son livre Aux jours de la destruction et de la révolte.
    [Show full text]
  • December Layout 1
    Vol. 38-No. 2 ISSN 0892-1571 November/December 2011-Kislev/Tevet 5772 PRESERVING THE PAST – GUARDING THE FUTURE: 30 YEARS OF ACHIEVEMENT ANNUAL TRIBUTE DINNER OF THE AMERICAN & INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR YAD VASHEM he annual gathering of the American passed on but whose spirit joins us on this and prejudice. We are always pleased to the imperative of Holocaust remembrance Tand International Societies for Yad joyous occasion. I am proud to see how far have with us and recognize the major lead- and thus help ensure that no nation – any- Vashem is an experience in remembrance we have come since that first meeting, ership of this spectacular 800 member as- where, anytime – should ever again suffer and continuity. This year the organization thanks to the generosity of all who are here sociation. a calamity of the unprecedented nature is celebrating its thirtieth anniversary. At tonight and those we remember with love. “The Young Leadership Associates are and scope that befell our people some 70 the Tribute Dinner that was held on No- We witness the growth of Yad Vashem, its the guardians of the future and will be re- years ago in Europe,” said Rabbi Lau. vember 20 at the Sheraton Hotel in New many sites and museums built, and pro- sponsible for ensuring our legacy. Recognizing the tremendous contribu- York, survivors were joined by the genera- grams established, through our efforts. “Our thoughts tonight are bittersweet; we tion of the Societies’ chairman Eli tions that are their inheritors of Jewish con- “And we see our future leaders, the remember our loved ones and all which Zborowski to the cause of Holocaust re- tinuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagesinspiteofall.Pdf
    Warning Concerning Copyright Restrictions The Copyright Law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If electronic transmission of reserve material is used for purposes in excess of what constitutes "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement. Images FOUR in Spite PHOTOGRAPHS FROM of All AUSCHWITZ GEORGES DIDI-HUBERMAN Translated by SHANE B. LILLIS THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS Chicago & London FOUR PIECES Inorde for our. OF FILM imagi SNATCHED FROM HELL itto t that OE response that we must offer, as a de that certain prisoners snatched, for of their experience. So let us not invo much harder was it for the prisoners few shreds of which now we are tru ing them simply by looking at them. 1 time more precious and less comforti , art, snatched as they were from a wo ity. Thus, images in spite of all: in spi in spite of the risks taken. In return, take them on, and try to comprehen in spite of our own inability to loo spite of our own world, full, almost c modities. [ ] Of all the prisoners in Auschwitz, many the SS wanted to eradicate at members of the Sonderkommando. Tli prisoners who operated the mass e hands.
    [Show full text]
  • Babadzhanian, Hamazasp
    Babadzhanian, Hamazasp Born: February 18th, 1906 Died: November 1st, 1977 (Aged 71) Ethnicity: Armenian Field of Activity: Red Army Brief Biography Hamazasp Khachaturi Babadzhanian was a Russian military general who served during multiple wars for the Soviet Union, rising to prominence during the Great Patriotic War. He was born in 1906 into an impecunious Armenian family in Chardakhlu, Azerbaijan. He attended a secondary school in Tiflis in 1915 but due to familial financial difficulties was forced to return home and toil in the fields on his family’s plot of land, later working as a highway worker during 1923-24. Babadzhanian joined the Red Army in 1925 and later attended a Military School in Yerevan in 1926, graduating as an officer in 1929, as well as joining the Soviet Communist Party in 1928. He received various postings, mopping up armed gangs in the Caucasus region in 1930 and aided in liquidating the Kulak revolt. Babadzhanian moved around frequently, generally within the Transcaucasus and Baku regions, until 1939-1940, when he served in the Finno-Soviet war. He played a pivotal role in numerous battles in World War 2, participating in the battle of Smolensk, as well as contributing a fundamentally in Yelnya, where he overcame a far superior German force. For his efforts in recapturing Stanslav he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. He provided support in Poland, as well fighting in Berlin, contributing to the capture of the Reichstag. After the Great Patriotic War Babadzhanian would prove crucial in quelling the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and some time after in 1975 became Chief Marshal of the Tank and Armoured Troops, a rank only he and one other attained.
    [Show full text]
  • From Humiliation to Humanity Reconciling Helen Goldman’S Testimony with the Forensic Strictures of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial
    S: I. M. O. N. Vol. 8|2021|No.1 SHOAH: INTERVENTION. METHODS. DOCUMENTATION. Andrew Clark Wisely From Humiliation to Humanity Reconciling Helen Goldman’s Testimony with the Forensic Strictures of the Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial Abstract On 3 September 1964, during the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial, Helen Goldman accused SS camp doctor Franz Lucas of selecting her mother and siblings for the gas chamber when the family arrived at Birkenau in May 1944. Although she could identify Lucas, the court con- sidered her information under cross-examination too inconsistent to build a case against Lucas. To appreciate Goldman’s authority, we must remove her from the humiliation of the West German legal gaze and inquire instead how she is seen through the lens of witness hospitality (directly by Emmi Bonhoeffer) and psychiatric assessment (indirectly by Dr Walter von Baeyer). The appearance of Auschwitz survivor Helen (Kaufman) Goldman in the court- room of the Frankfurt Auschwitz trial on 3 September 1964 was hard to forget for all onlookers. Goldman accused the former SS camp doctor Dr Franz Lucas of se- lecting her mother and younger siblings for the gas chamber on the day the family arrived at Birkenau in May 1944.1 Lucas, considered the best behaved of the twenty defendants during the twenty-month-long trial, claimed not to recognise his accus- er, who after identifying him from a line-up became increasingly distraught under cross-examination. Ultimately, the court rejected Goldman’s accusations, choosing instead to believe survivors of Ravensbrück who recounted that Lucas had helped them survive the final months of the war.2 Goldman’s breakdown of credibility echoed the experience of many prosecution witnesses in West German postwar tri- als after 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Habes Roman Christoph Und Sein Vater – Zwischen Persönlicher Verarbeitung Und Den Westdeutschen Schuld- Und Aufarbeitungsdiskursen Der Nachkriegszeit
    HANS HABES ROMAN CHRISTOPH UND SEIN VATER – ZWISCHEN PERSÖNLICHER VERARBEITUNG UND DEN WESTDEUTSCHEN SCHULD- UND AUFARBEITUNGSDISKURSEN DER NACHKRIEGSZEIT BY CHRISTIAN AHLREP THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in German in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Adviser: Associate Professor Anke Pinkert ABSTRACT This Master thesis is an investigation of the Book “Christoph und sein Vater” by Hans Habe. The author was one of the most important publicists in West Germany after World War II. During his life he wrote more than twenty books, some of them translated into English, and around ten thousand newspaper articles, but today he is unknown and unnoticed by literary scholars. The beginning of this thesis (chapter 2) summarizes the investigated book and highlights biographical information about Hans Habe. The main topic of the book is the relationship between Veit Harlan, the director of the anti-Semitic film “Jud Suess” during the Nazi period, and his son Thomas Harlan. The literary interpretation reveals not only a relationship between the main characters and the German postwar period (chapter 3), but also a strong connection to the book “Ritualmord in Ungarn” by Arnold Zweig and explores the question of Jewishness in a Christian society (chapter 4), Habe’s depiction of the Harlan family (chapter 5) and how the author discusses several problems of the 1960s German society (chapter 6). The interpretation concludes with a short summary (chapter 7). In this thesis I argue that Hans Habe uses the conflict between Veit and Thomas Harlan to, on the one hand, cast his own criticism on the German postwar society, and on the other hand, to come to terms with the suicide of his father.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of STALINGRAD Belligerents
    THE BATTLE OF STALINGRAD DATE: AUGUST 23 1942 – FEBRUARY 02 1943 Belligerents Germany Soviet Union Italy Romania Hungary Croatia The Battle of Stalingrad was a brutal military campaign between Russian forces and those of Nazi Germany and the Axis powers during World War 2. The battle is infamous as one of the largest, longest and bloodiest engagements in modern warfare: from August 1942 through February 1943, more than two million troops fought in close quarters – and nearly two million people were killed or injured in the fighting, including tens of thousands of Russian civilians. But the Battle of Stalingrad (one of Russia’s important industrial cities) ultimately turned the tide of World War 2 in favor of the Allied forces. PRELUDE In the middle of World War 2 – having captured territory in much of present-day Ukraine and Belarus in the spring on 1942 – Germany’s Wehrmacht forces decide to mount an offensive on southern Russia in the summer of that year. Under the leadership of ruthless head of state Joseph Stalin, Russian forces had already successfully rebuffed a German attack on the western part of the country – one that had the ultimate goal of taking Moscow – during the winter of 1941-42. However, Stalin’s Red Army had suffered significant losses in the fighting, both in terms of manpower and weaponry. Stalin and his generals, including future Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev, fully expected another Nazi attack to be aimed at Moscow. However, Hitler and the Wehrmacht had other ideas. They set their sights on Stalingrad; the city served as an industrial center in Russia, producing, among other important goods, artillery for the country’s troops.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Common Misconceptions About World War II
    Seven Common Misconceptions about World War II World War II ended three-quarters of a century ago. Now only a tiny and fast- dwindling number of Americans still possess an active memory of the conflict, and most of the rest of us view what happened through the gauzy tissue of fiction and faulty memory. The United States won the war, didn’t we? Through the unparalleled courage of the “Greatest Generation” and the awesome industrial power of our economy, we overwhelmed the Nazi juggernaut in little more than three years and brought Imperial Japan to her knees in less than four. Well, yes. There’s more than a fair measure of truth in all that. In fact, it’s true as far as it goes. But the story of the Second World War is far, far bigger, and far more complex. Most Americans labor under misconceptions about its true nature. And that truth is hiding in plain sight for anyone willing to look closely. Here goes . #1. World War II lasted for four years. Some historians consider World Wars I and II to be part of a single protracted conflict— a twentieth-century Thirty Years’ War, if you will. Others argue that the second global war began in 1931 when Japan’s renegade Kwantung Army engineered the Mukden Incident and subsequently invaded Manchuria. Others still might contend that the Italian invasion of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) in 1935-37 or the German and Italian involvement in the Spanish Civil War in 1936-39, usually thought a dry run for the Axis, should be considered of a piece with the global conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVE on STALINGRAD the Roads and the Roadblocks to Victory by Ronald P
    22 OPERA TlONAL ANAL YSIS DRIVE ON STALINGRAD The Roads and the Roadblocks to Victory by Ronald P. Hamm Every once in a while I get this impulse to go way could not possibly be found. Hitler's concentration was possible only because of back to the DOS map and color it in . Even if personal control of this offensive resulted in the earlier patient withdrawals. This tactic al­ the terrain added wouldn't be accurate, it the total destruction of the striking power of lowed the buildup of a massive reserve which would break up those dull expanses of the Wehrmacht and the loss of the entire Don smashed the weak Axis Allies and surround­ nothing that designer Hessel stuck me with. River basin. It also shortened the war by two ed the Sixth Army in November. According to Fred Helferrich (Ed . of F&Ml to five years. there actually is some terrain that could be Very briefly and simplistically, covering The Simulation put in (and he should know, having been the opening months of the campaign is not The situation presented by Drive on there at the timel. Missing terra in or not. easy, but tiere goes. The northern arm of the Stalingrad offers the original. choices and op­ giant pincer started first. In driving on Voro­ there is an awful lot of maneuver room in the portunities to both sides. History itself is game - and many of you have sent in ar ­ nezh, the fierce fighting delayed the time­ easily recreated if firm decisions are not ticles concerning it.
    [Show full text]
  • Issn 2334-7171
    ISSN 2334-7171 ISSN 2334-7058 (Online) DOI 10.12709/issn.2334-7058 4D 61 6E 61 67 65 6D 65 6E 74 45 64 75 63 61 74 69 6F 6E 53 63 69 65 6E 63 65 54 65 63 68 6E 6F 6C 6F 67 79 ISSN 2334-7171 ISSN 2334-7058 (Online) DOI 10.12709/issn.2334-7058 This issue: DOI 10.12709/mest.03.03.02.00 MEST Journal Management Education Science & Society Technologies Edited by Zoran Čekerevac MEST Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 July 2015 CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 005+37+3+66 MEST Journal : Management, Education, Science & Society, Technologies / editor-in-chief Zoran P. Čekerevac. – [Štampano izd.]. – Vol. 3, no. 2 (2015) – – Belgrade : MESTE NGO : Faculty of Business and Industrial Management of the “Union – Nikola Tesla” University Belgrade ; Toronto : SZ & Associates, 2013- (Belgrade : ICIM+). – 30 cm Polugodišnje. - Drugo izdanje na drugom medijumu: MEST Journal (Online) = ISSN 2334-7058 ISSN 2334-7171 = MEST Journal (Štampano Izd.) COBISS.SR- ID 196182028 MEST Journal Imprint MEST Journal online DOI 10.12709/issn.2334-7058 This issue DOI 10.12709/mest.03.03.02.00 MEST Journal is an international academic journal, official journal of the non-profit organization MESTE, published online, as well as print (subscription), which publishes scientific and professional research articles and reviews in English language. MEST Journal is published from Belgrade - Serbia and Toronto - Canada. The focal point of the journal is at international level, with the view on matters from a global perspective, but, also, some papers concerning some local specific events could be published.
    [Show full text]
  • 1945 the Aftermath of the Holocaust Scenario
    THE AFTERMatH subject OF THE HOLOCAUST Context9. Historians of the Second World War, par- The painful truth was nevertheless re- ticularly the Holocaust, have not to date vealed, despite German attempts to hide been able to determine the exact number the scale of their crimes and destruction of Jews murdered at that time. Shortly af- of their evidence. Still during the war, gov- ter the war, the number was generally es- ernments of Allied countries fighting the timated to be approximately six million. It was Germans announced a court trial for those re- recognised that approximately four million died sponsible for crimes committed in occupied ter- in camps and the remaining two million in oth- ritories. This includes a declaration of 13 January er locations, primarily ghettos, and as a result of 1942 signed in London at a meeting headed by mass executions by Einsatzgruppen in the East. the Prime Minister of the Polish government-in-ex- These numbers were cited by the International ile Władysław Sikorski. Representatives of nine al- Military Tribunal in Nuremberg and were based on lied countries issued a written document on the German statistics. These statistics are nevertheless post-war prosecution of crime perpetrators. The inexact, because not all documentation on all Ger- exposed extent of genocide that took place dur- man crimes against Jews has been found. Addi- ing the war meant that public opinion in the free tionally, the Germans documented the Holocaust world demanded that all those guilty be swiftly with varying precision. Some aspects were scru- punished immediately after the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Unternehmen Wintergewitter December 17-19, 1942 - Stalingrad Setup Order
    Unternehmen Wintergewitter December 17-19, 1942 - Stalingrad Setup order 1 x10 23rd Pzr Div 6th Pzr Div 17th Pzr Div Verkhne-Kumsky 2 x4 Kapkinsky Nizhne-Kumsky 3 x6 Myshkova River 4 x3 2nd Gds Army 2nd Gds Army Logovsky 5 x2 Karpovka River 57th Army Sovetsky Karpovka River 6 x13 Tundutovo 4th Mech Corps 13th Tank Corps Stalingrad Pocket 7 x6 8 x9 Historical Background Operation Winter Storm (German Unternehmen Wintergewitter) was the German Fourth Panzer Army's attempt to relieve German General Von Paulus' Sixth Army from encirclement during the Battle of Stalingrad. The operation commenced on 12 December 1942 and was able to advance just halfway to its objective, up to the Myshkova River, before a Soviet outflanking move further to the north forced the relief force to break off and withdraw, dooming the Sixth Army to defeat and capture. 9 x5 The relief attempt depended on a makeshift armoured corps of three panzer divisions, totalling 75,000 men and 500 tanks, assembled by Field Marshal Erich von Manstein. He put General Hoth in charge of the spearhead. The 6th Panzer Division came from refitting in France after nine months on the Eastern Front. The 17th Panzer Division came from Army Group Centre on the Zhizdra front, and the 23rd Panzer Division, recovering from a narrowly averted disaster before Orzhonikidze, came from Army Group A in the Caucasus. These three divisions constituted the LVII Panzer Corps. 10 x2 LVII Panzer Corps was assembled at Kotelnikovo, with 6th Panzer in the middle, 17th Panzer to its left and 23rd Panzer to its right, and the offensive began on 12 December.
    [Show full text]