DOCSLIB.ORG

Unternehmen Wintergewitter December 17-19, 1942 - Stalingrad Setup Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unternehmen Wintergewitter December 17-19, 1942 - Stalingrad Setup Order Unternehmen Wintergewitter December 17-19, 1942 - Stalingrad Setup order 1 x10 23rd Pzr Div 6th Pzr Div 17th Pzr Div Verkhne-Kumsky 2 x4 Kapkinsky Nizhne-Kumsky 3 x6 Myshkova River 4 x3 2nd Gds Army 2nd Gds Army Logovsky 5 x2 Karpovka River 57th Army Sovetsky Karpovka River 6 x13 Tundutovo 4th Mech Corps 13th Tank Corps Stalingrad Pocket 7 x6 8 x9 Historical Background Operation Winter Storm (German Unternehmen Wintergewitter) was the German Fourth Panzer Army's attempt to relieve German General Von Paulus' Sixth Army from encirclement during the Battle of Stalingrad. The operation commenced on 12 December 1942 and was able to advance just halfway to its objective, up to the Myshkova River, before a Soviet outflanking move further to the north forced the relief force to break off and withdraw, dooming the Sixth Army to defeat and capture. 9 x5 The relief attempt depended on a makeshift armoured corps of three panzer divisions, totalling 75,000 men and 500 tanks, assembled by Field Marshal Erich von Manstein. He put General Hoth in charge of the spearhead. The 6th Panzer Division came from refitting in France after nine months on the Eastern Front. The 17th Panzer Division came from Army Group Centre on the Zhizdra front, and the 23rd Panzer Division, recovering from a narrowly averted disaster before Orzhonikidze, came from Army Group A in the Caucasus. These three divisions constituted the LVII Panzer Corps. 10 x2 LVII Panzer Corps was assembled at Kotelnikovo, with 6th Panzer in the middle, 17th Panzer to its left and 23rd Panzer to its right, and the offensive began on 12 December. The Aksai River and the Myshkova River lay in the force's path. The force made good progress at first, reaching and crossing the Aksai by the end of the first day, and ground towards the Myshkova, using up precious time, but could not cross, the 6th and 17th Panzer coming up against the 4th Mechanised Corps, and the 23rd Panzer battling the 13th Tank Corps. This is where the scenario picks up the story. In Stalingrad itself, von Paulus dithered over Operation Thunderclap. This was a planned breakout from the Stalingrad pocket by his exhausted and freezing troops, where they would join with Hoth's panzer force and together withdraw to Kotelnikovo. Despite encouragement from von Manstein, von Paulus could not make the decision to initiate the breakout without a direct order from Adolf Hitler. Obsessed with not withdrawing from where his forces had set foot, Hitler did not give the order, and Paulus stayed put. After the war, von Manstein explained how he had tried to persuade Hitler to approve Thunderclap. He also felt von Paulus should have launched it with or without permission. However, whether von Paulus' fuel- and food-lacking forces could have got themselves out of Stalingrad at all by then is open to question. As the relief force made its thrust, Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov sliced through the Italians holding the Axis front line further to the north. Seeing that this powerful Soviet force was wheeling to the left in order to come down behind the German relief effort, von Manstein detached the 6th Panzer Division from the effort to cross the Myshkova and rushed it to the Italians' aid, saving the position there for the moment but dooming the Stalingrad relief attempt. Having lost the 6th Panzer, the relief force was driven back to and beyond Kotelnikovo by 29 December, and now there was a threat to both Rostov and the entire Army Group A of 400,000 men still bottled up on the Terek River in the Caucasus. Hitler had to make the hard decision to pull this force out altogether, consigning Stalingrad to its fate. Hoth's vainglorious charge was over. The stage is set, the battle lines are drawn, and you are in command. The rest is history. by the Allied player. Briefing The Axis and Allied Special Forces Infantry units are mechanised infantry units. Axis Player: General Hermann Hoth: Take 5 Command cards. Place a Special Forces Badge in the same hex with these units to distinguish them You move first. from the other units. They may move 1 or 2 hexes and battle. Russian Player: General A. Eremenko: Take 5 Command cards. Four Axis units start at reduced strength as indicated. These units may not recover figures beyond this level by use of a Medics and Mechanics card. Conditions of Victory All Allied tank units start with four figures. 7 Medals Russian Command rules are in effect (see p.3 EF). Each Stalingrad pocket unit that exits off the Axis base edge of the board counts The Myshkova and Karpovka Rivers are frozen. Refer to p.3 (EF) about frozen as 1 victory medal. rivers. Russian Villages have the same effect as a Town & Village hex (M44 p.14). Special Rules Winter Forest have the same effect as a Forest hex (M44 p.13). Unternehmen Donnerschlag (Operation Thunderclap): Hill with Forest has the same effect as a Forest hex (M44 p.13). If any Axis unit ends its turn adjacent to any Stalingrad pocket unit, or if the Axis player plays Their Finest Hour, both of the units in the Stalingrad pocket may You need the Eastern Front expansion to play this scenario. from that moment be activated normally, and attacked by the Allied player. The Stalingrad pocket troops may NOT be activated on a turn that the German player plays Behind Enemy Lines. Until the Stalingrad pocket troops have been activated they may not be attacked Symbols & Graphics Copyright (c) 2004 - 2021 Days of Wonder, Inc. Produced with permission, for non-commercial use only..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Babadzhanian, Hamazasp
    Babadzhanian, Hamazasp Born: February 18th, 1906 Died: November 1st, 1977 (Aged 71) Ethnicity: Armenian Field of Activity: Red Army Brief Biography Hamazasp Khachaturi Babadzhanian was a Russian military general who served during multiple wars for the Soviet Union, rising to prominence during the Great Patriotic War. He was born in 1906 into an impecunious Armenian family in Chardakhlu, Azerbaijan. He attended a secondary school in Tiflis in 1915 but due to familial financial difficulties was forced to return home and toil in the fields on his family’s plot of land, later working as a highway worker during 1923-24. Babadzhanian joined the Red Army in 1925 and later attended a Military School in Yerevan in 1926, graduating as an officer in 1929, as well as joining the Soviet Communist Party in 1928. He received various postings, mopping up armed gangs in the Caucasus region in 1930 and aided in liquidating the Kulak revolt. Babadzhanian moved around frequently, generally within the Transcaucasus and Baku regions, until 1939-1940, when he served in the Finno-Soviet war. He played a pivotal role in numerous battles in World War 2, participating in the battle of Smolensk, as well as contributing a fundamentally in Yelnya, where he overcame a far superior German force. For his efforts in recapturing Stanslav he received the title of Hero of the Soviet Union. He provided support in Poland, as well fighting in Berlin, contributing to the capture of the Reichstag. After the Great Patriotic War Babadzhanian would prove crucial in quelling the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, and some time after in 1975 became Chief Marshal of the Tank and Armoured Troops, a rank only he and one other attained.
    [Show full text]
  • Blitzkrieg: the Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht's
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2021 Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era Briggs Evans East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Evans, Briggs, "Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era" (2021). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3927. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3927 This Thesis - unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era ________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ______________________ by Briggs Evans August 2021 _____________________ Dr. Stephen Fritz, Chair Dr. Henry Antkiewicz Dr. Steve Nash Keywords: Blitzkrieg, doctrine, operational warfare, American military, Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe, World War II, Cold War, Soviet Union, Operation Desert Storm, AirLand Battle, Combined Arms Theory, mobile warfare, maneuver warfare. ABSTRACT Blitzkrieg: The Evolution of Modern Warfare and the Wehrmacht’s Impact on American Military Doctrine during the Cold War Era by Briggs Evans The evolution of United States military doctrine was heavily influenced by the Wehrmacht and their early Blitzkrieg campaigns during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Tribunal, Indictments
    MILITARY TRIBUNALS Case No. 12 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -against- WILHELM' VON LEEB, HUGO SPERRLE, GEORG KARL FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON KUECHLER, JOHANNES BLASKOWITZ, HERMANN HOTH, HANS REINHARDT. HANS VON SALMUTH, KARL HOL­ LIDT, .OTTO SCHNmWIND,. KARL VON ROQUES, HERMANN REINECKE., WALTERWARLIMONT, OTTO WOEHLER;. and RUDOLF LEHMANN. Defendants OFFICE OF MILITARY GOVERNMENT FOR GERMANY (US) NORNBERG 1947 • PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ TABLE OF CONTENTS - Page INTRODUCTORY 1 COUNT ONE-CRIMES AGAINST PEACE 6 A Austria 'and Czechoslovakia 7 B. Poland, France and The United Kingdom 9 C. Denmark and Norway 10 D. Belgium, The Netherland.; and Luxembourg 11 E. Yugoslavia and Greece 14 F. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 17 G. The United states of America 20 . , COUNT TWO-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST ENEMY BELLIGERENTS AND PRISONERS OF WAR 21 A: The "Commissar" Order , 22 B. The "Commando" Order . 23 C, Prohibited Labor of Prisoners of Wal 24 D. Murder and III Treatment of Prisoners of War 25 . COUNT THREE-WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: CRIMES AGAINST CIVILIANS 27 A Deportation and Enslavement of Civilians . 29 B. Plunder of Public and Private Property, Wanton Destruc­ tion, and Devastation not Justified by Military Necessity. 31 C. Murder, III Treatment and Persecution 'of Civilian Popu- lations . 32 COUNT FOUR-COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY 39 APPENDIX A-STATEMENT OF MILITARY POSITIONS HELD BY THE DEFENDANTS AND CO-PARTICIPANTS 40 2 PURL: https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/c6a171/ INDICTMENT
    [Show full text]
  • A War of Reputation and Pride
    A War of reputation and pride - An examination of the memoirs of German generals after the Second World War. HIS 4090 Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse Department of Archaeology, Conservation and History University of Oslo Spring 2019 1 “For the great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -- deliberate, contrived and dishonest -- but the myth -- persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.” – John F. Kennedy, 19621 1John F. Kennedy, Yale University Commencement Address, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/jfkyalecommencement.htm, [01.05.2019]. 2 Acknowledgments This master would not have been written without the help and support of my mother, father, friends and my better half, thank you all for your support. I would like to thank the University Library of Oslo and the British Library in London for providing me with abundant books and articles. I also want to give huge thanks to the Military Archive in Freiburg and their employees, who helped me find the relevant materials for this master. Finally, I would like to thank my supervisor at the University of Oslo, Professor Kim Christian Priemel, who has guided me through the entire writing process from Autumn 2017. Peter Jørgen Sager Fosse, Oslo, 01.05.2019 3 Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………………...………... 7 Chapter 1, Theory and background………………………………………………..………17 1.1 German Military Tactics…………………………………………………..………. 17 1.1.1 Blitzkrieg, Kesselschlacht and Schwerpunkt…………………………………..……. 17 1.1.2 Examples from early campaigns……………………………………………..……… 20 1.2 The German attack on the USSR (1941)……………………………..…………… 24 1.2.1 ‘Vernichtungskrieg’, war of annihilation………………………………...………….. 24 1.2.2 Operation Barbarossa………………………………………………..……………… 28 1.2.3 Operation Typhoon…………………………………………………..………………. 35 1.2.4 The strategic situation, December 1941…………………………….……………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Third Winter
    GAME SPECIFIC RULES The Third Winter ©2021 Multi-Man Publishing, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Updated 12 August 2021 late September 1943. By the campaign’s converted to Soviet gauge (ignore units Game Design: Antony Birkett end in late April 1944, four Axis armies being supplied by a Kessel HQ.) Development: Chip Saltsman will have faced four Soviet fronts in a titanic struggle. Several scenarios Design Note: By this point in the Series Design: Dean Essig supplement the main campaign, as the war, the Soviets had immense logistical Research Help: Stéphane Acquaviva, German army fights its “Third Winter” in activities that are not represented by units. Carl Fung, Hans Kishel, Roland LeBlanc Russia. 1.2a Off-Map Rail. Either player can use Mapping Research & Playtest their Rail Capacity to rail cargo off and Graphics: Hans Kishel back on any of their map-edges (as long as Graphics: Curtis Baer, Dean Essig the cargo does not cross the Black Sea). 1.0 General Special The only hexes that can be used for this Playtesting Honcho: Marcus Randall Rules purpose are those capable of normal rail Playtesting and Proofreading: Perry movement for that player. No ground unit Andrus, Stéphane Acquaviva, Curtis Baer, can ever end its movement off map. Daniel Broh-Kahn, Dave Barsness, Allen 1.1 Map & Terrain 1.2b Extra Detrainable Hexes. Point of Beach, John Bowen, Art Brochet, Eric Interest hexes on the map are detrainable. Brosius, Thomas Buettner, Malcolm There are four maps labeled A through D. Cameron, Stephen Campbell, Jeff Coyle, Hexes are identified by a map letter and Houndog Cross, Paolo De Francesco, number, e.g., hex B60.10 is a Kharkov city 1.3 Rumania Air Box Myk Deans, Mark Fazakarley, Mark hex.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE of STALINGRAD Belligerents
    THE BATTLE OF STALINGRAD DATE: AUGUST 23 1942 – FEBRUARY 02 1943 Belligerents Germany Soviet Union Italy Romania Hungary Croatia The Battle of Stalingrad was a brutal military campaign between Russian forces and those of Nazi Germany and the Axis powers during World War 2. The battle is infamous as one of the largest, longest and bloodiest engagements in modern warfare: from August 1942 through February 1943, more than two million troops fought in close quarters – and nearly two million people were killed or injured in the fighting, including tens of thousands of Russian civilians. But the Battle of Stalingrad (one of Russia’s important industrial cities) ultimately turned the tide of World War 2 in favor of the Allied forces. PRELUDE In the middle of World War 2 – having captured territory in much of present-day Ukraine and Belarus in the spring on 1942 – Germany’s Wehrmacht forces decide to mount an offensive on southern Russia in the summer of that year. Under the leadership of ruthless head of state Joseph Stalin, Russian forces had already successfully rebuffed a German attack on the western part of the country – one that had the ultimate goal of taking Moscow – during the winter of 1941-42. However, Stalin’s Red Army had suffered significant losses in the fighting, both in terms of manpower and weaponry. Stalin and his generals, including future Soviet Union leader Nikita Khrushchev, fully expected another Nazi attack to be aimed at Moscow. However, Hitler and the Wehrmacht had other ideas. They set their sights on Stalingrad; the city served as an industrial center in Russia, producing, among other important goods, artillery for the country’s troops.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download the Korsun Pocket: the Encirclement and Breakout Of
    THE KORSUN POCKET: THE ENCIRCLEMENT AND BREAKOUT OF A GERMAN ARMY IN THE EAST, 1944 PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Niklas Zetterling,Anders Frankson | 320 pages | 08 Sep 2008 | Casemate Books | 9781932033885 | English | Havertown, United States Battle of Korsun-Cherkassy Under Erich von Manstein, however, the Germans were able to avoid serious defeats, while at the same time fending off Hitler's insane orders to hold on to useless territory. Then, in January , a disaster happened. Six divisions of Army Group South became surrounded after sudden attacks by the 1st and 2nd Ukrainian Fronts under command of generals Nikolai Vatutin and Ivan Konev around the village of Korsun near the larger town of Cherkassy on the Dnieper. The Germans' greatest fear was the prospect of another Stalingrad, the catastrophe that had occurred precisely one year before. This time, though, Manstein was in control from the start, and he immediately rearranged his Army Group to rescue his trapped divisions. A major panzer drive got underway, led by General der Panzertruppen Hans Hube, a survivor from Stalingrad pocket, which promptly ran up against several soviet tank armies. Leading the break-in was Franz Baeke with his Tiger and Panther-tanks. Led by the strongest formation within the pocket, SS Wiking, the trapped forces surged out and soon rejoined the surrounding panzer divisions who had been fully engaged in weakening the ring. When dawn broke, the Soviets realized their prey was escaping. Although the Germans within the pocket lost nearly all of their heavy weapons and left many wounded behind, their escape was effected. Stalin, having anticipated another Stalingrad, was left with little but an empty bag, as Army Group South—this time—had pulled off a rescue.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Common Misconceptions About World War II
    Seven Common Misconceptions about World War II World War II ended three-quarters of a century ago. Now only a tiny and fast- dwindling number of Americans still possess an active memory of the conflict, and most of the rest of us view what happened through the gauzy tissue of fiction and faulty memory. The United States won the war, didn’t we? Through the unparalleled courage of the “Greatest Generation” and the awesome industrial power of our economy, we overwhelmed the Nazi juggernaut in little more than three years and brought Imperial Japan to her knees in less than four. Well, yes. There’s more than a fair measure of truth in all that. In fact, it’s true as far as it goes. But the story of the Second World War is far, far bigger, and far more complex. Most Americans labor under misconceptions about its true nature. And that truth is hiding in plain sight for anyone willing to look closely. Here goes . #1. World War II lasted for four years. Some historians consider World Wars I and II to be part of a single protracted conflict— a twentieth-century Thirty Years’ War, if you will. Others argue that the second global war began in 1931 when Japan’s renegade Kwantung Army engineered the Mukden Incident and subsequently invaded Manchuria. Others still might contend that the Italian invasion of Abyssinia (Ethiopia) in 1935-37 or the German and Italian involvement in the Spanish Civil War in 1936-39, usually thought a dry run for the Axis, should be considered of a piece with the global conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • DRIVE on STALINGRAD the Roads and the Roadblocks to Victory by Ronald P
    22 OPERA TlONAL ANAL YSIS DRIVE ON STALINGRAD The Roads and the Roadblocks to Victory by Ronald P. Hamm Every once in a while I get this impulse to go way could not possibly be found. Hitler's concentration was possible only because of back to the DOS map and color it in . Even if personal control of this offensive resulted in the earlier patient withdrawals. This tactic al­ the terrain added wouldn't be accurate, it the total destruction of the striking power of lowed the buildup of a massive reserve which would break up those dull expanses of the Wehrmacht and the loss of the entire Don smashed the weak Axis Allies and surround­ nothing that designer Hessel stuck me with. River basin. It also shortened the war by two ed the Sixth Army in November. According to Fred Helferrich (Ed . of F&Ml to five years. there actually is some terrain that could be Very briefly and simplistically, covering The Simulation put in (and he should know, having been the opening months of the campaign is not The situation presented by Drive on there at the timel. Missing terra in or not. easy, but tiere goes. The northern arm of the Stalingrad offers the original. choices and op­ giant pincer started first. In driving on Voro­ there is an awful lot of maneuver room in the portunities to both sides. History itself is game - and many of you have sent in ar ­ nezh, the fierce fighting delayed the time­ easily recreated if firm decisions are not ticles concerning it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Stalingrad: a Behavior Analytic Perspective Revista Mexicana De Análisis De La Conducta, Vol
    Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta ISSN: 0185-4534 [email protected] Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta México Pulido, Marco A. The battle of stalingrad: a behavior analytic perspective Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, vol. 33, núm. 2, 2007, pp. 239-246 Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta Guadalajara, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59333208 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative REVISTA MEXICANA DE ANÁLISIS DE LA CONDUCTA 2007 NÚMERO 2 (DIC) MEXICAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS 33, 239-246 NUMBER 2 (DEC) THE BATTLE OF STALINGRAD: A BEHAVIOR ANALYTIC PERSPECTIVE LA BATALLA DE STALINGRADO: UNA PERSPECTIVA BASADA EN EL ANÁLISIS DE LA CONDUCTA MARCO A. PULIDO1 LABORATORIO DE CONDICIONAMIENTO OPERANTE UNIVERSIDAD INTERCONTINENTAL ABSTRACT The purpose of the present paper is to suggest ways in which historians may use behavior analysis as a tool to design research agendas that may help them understand complex human behavior and atypical decision making pro- cesses. This paper presents a brief outline describing the general epistemo- logical and pragmatic virtues of approaching human behavior from a behavior analytic perspective. This outline is followed by a general description of the elements that should be taken into consideration when developing a research agenda based on behavior analytic principles. Lastly a research agenda re- garding a series of puzzling events leading to the encirclement of German Sixth Army during the so called “Battle of Stalingrad,” is used to exemplify the methodology proposed in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Issn 2334-7171
    ISSN 2334-7171 ISSN 2334-7058 (Online) DOI 10.12709/issn.2334-7058 4D 61 6E 61 67 65 6D 65 6E 74 45 64 75 63 61 74 69 6F 6E 53 63 69 65 6E 63 65 54 65 63 68 6E 6F 6C 6F 67 79 ISSN 2334-7171 ISSN 2334-7058 (Online) DOI 10.12709/issn.2334-7058 This issue: DOI 10.12709/mest.03.03.02.00 MEST Journal Management Education Science & Society Technologies Edited by Zoran Čekerevac MEST Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 July 2015 CIP – Каталогизација у публикацији Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 005+37+3+66 MEST Journal : Management, Education, Science & Society, Technologies / editor-in-chief Zoran P. Čekerevac. – [Štampano izd.]. – Vol. 3, no. 2 (2015) – – Belgrade : MESTE NGO : Faculty of Business and Industrial Management of the “Union – Nikola Tesla” University Belgrade ; Toronto : SZ & Associates, 2013- (Belgrade : ICIM+). – 30 cm Polugodišnje. - Drugo izdanje na drugom medijumu: MEST Journal (Online) = ISSN 2334-7058 ISSN 2334-7171 = MEST Journal (Štampano Izd.) COBISS.SR- ID 196182028 MEST Journal Imprint MEST Journal online DOI 10.12709/issn.2334-7058 This issue DOI 10.12709/mest.03.03.02.00 MEST Journal is an international academic journal, official journal of the non-profit organization MESTE, published online, as well as print (subscription), which publishes scientific and professional research articles and reviews in English language. MEST Journal is published from Belgrade - Serbia and Toronto - Canada. The focal point of the journal is at international level, with the view on matters from a global perspective, but, also, some papers concerning some local specific events could be published.
    [Show full text]
  • Glantz Vol III Book 1 LATEST.Indd
    © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. Contents List of Maps, Tables, and Illustrations ix Preface xv Selected Abbreviations xxi Part I. Soviet Strategic Planning 1. Framework for Disaster 3 Frustration 3 The Wehrmacht in November 1942 8 German Field Commanders 11 The Red Army in November 1942 12 Soviet Field Commanders 15 2. Soviet Strategic Planning: The Genesis of Plan Uranus 20 Who Formulated Plan Uranus? The Historical Debate 20 Competing Offensive Concepts 23 Triumph of the “Different Solution,” 1–13 October 31 Plan Uranus Takes Shape, 14–31 October 38 Final Preparations, 1–18 November 41 Reflections 50 3. Gathering the Troops: Soviet Order of Battle and the Uranus Plan 55 Regrouping Forces for the Counteroffensive 55 Soviet Order of Battle 58 The Uranus Plan 79 Front and Army Plans 93 4. The Balance of Opposing Forces on 18 November 127 Soviet Forces 127 Axis Forces and Defenses 131 The Correlation of Opposing Forces 165 Part II. The Uranus Counteroffensive 5. The Penetration Battle, 19–20 November 185 Preliminaries 185 © University Press of Kansas. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution prohibited without permission of the Press. viii Contents The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 19–20 November 192 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 20 November 248 6. The Encirclement Closes, 21–23 November 268 German Dilemmas on 21 November 268 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 21 November 271 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 21 November 288 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 22 November 299 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 22 November 323 The Southwestern and Don Fronts’ Offensive, 23 November 337 The Stalingrad Front’s Offensive, 23 November 358 The Situation Late on 23 November 369 German Dilemmas on 23 November 371 7.
    [Show full text]