General Safety Regulation Draft

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Safety Regulation Draft EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.5.2018 SWD(2018) 190 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on type- approval requirements for motor vehicles and their trailers, and systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles, as regards their general safety and the protection of vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users, amending Regulation (EU) 2018/… and repealing Regulations (EC) No 78/2009, (EC) No 79/2009 and (EC) No 661/2009 {COM(2018) 286 final} - {SEC(2018) 270 final} - {SWD(2018) 191 final} EN EN Table of Contents List of abbreviations and glossary of terms ............................................................................... 5 1. Introduction: Political and legal context ............................................................................. 7 1.1. Political context ............................................................................................................ 7 1.2. Legal context ................................................................................................................ 8 1.2.1. Vehicle safety legislation under the type-approval framework ............................ 9 1.3. Adapting the legislation to vehicle safety developments ............................................. 9 1.4. Contribution of vehicle safety legislation to road safety in general .......................... 10 2. What is the problem and why is it a problem? .................................................................. 12 2.1. Traffic accidents in the EU and their effects .............................................................. 12 2.2. Transformation of main safety problem into vehicle level problems ........................ 16 2.3. Slow market uptake of new safety features in the vehicle fleet ................................. 18 2.4. Competitiveness and innovation ................................................................................ 18 2.5. Efficiency of measures introduced so far ................................................................... 18 2.6. Market description ..................................................................................................... 19 2.7. Outdated safety exemptions for SUVs, MPVs, vans and the like .............................. 20 2.8. Contribution to the reduction of the regulatory burden on companies ...................... 21 2.9. Main problem drivers and consequences ................................................................... 23 3. Why should the EU act? .................................................................................................... 23 4. What should be achieved? ................................................................................................. 24 5. What are the various options to achieve the objectives? ................................................... 25 5.1. Measures to completely avoid accidents, to reduce the overall severity of accidents or to mitigate the outcome of injuries in accidents between vehicles or vehicles and obstacles ........................................................................................................................... 27 5.1.1. Frontal impact occurrences ................................................................................. 27 5.1.2. Side impact occurrences...................................................................................... 30 5.1.3. Rear impact occurrences ..................................................................................... 30 5.2. Measures to completely avoid accidents, to reduce the overall severity of accidents or to mitigate the outcome of injuries that result from impacts between vehicles and pedestrians and cyclists .................................................................................................... 31 5.2.1. Pedestrian and cyclist protection when hit by front-of-vehicle .......................... 31 5.2.2. Pedestrian and cyclist protection when hit by side-of-vehicle ............................ 33 5.2.3. Pedestrian and cyclist protection when hit by rear-of-vehicle ............................ 33 5.3. Policy option “Baseline” ............................................................................................ 34 1 5.4. Policy options “Regulatory approach” to prevent road accidents or to mitigate the outcome of accidents ........................................................................................................ 34 5.4.1. Design of options and timeframe for implementation ........................................ 35 5.4.2. Policy option 1: Generalisation of mature and widely available safety features 36 5.4.3. Policy option 2: Introducing widely available and less commonly available safety features as standard equipment .............................................................................. 37 5.4.4. Policy option 3: Introduction of a full set of safety features boosting innovation 38 5.5. Options discarded at an early stage ............................................................................ 38 5.5.1. Policy option “Self-regulation” ........................................................................... 38 6. What are the impacts of the different policy options and who will be affected? .............. 39 6.1. Social impact .............................................................................................................. 39 6.2. Environmental impact ................................................................................................ 40 6.3. Economic impact ........................................................................................................ 40 6.3.1. Costs 41 6.3.2. Benefits ............................................................................................................... 42 6.3.3. Impact of additional safety measures on vehicle prices and sales prices ............ 43 6.3.4. Competitiveness and drivers of innovation ......................................................... 44 7. How do the options compare? ........................................................................................... 45 7.1. Effectiveness .............................................................................................................. 45 7.1.1. Effectiveness in achieving the general objective ................................................ 45 7.1.2. Effectiveness in achieving the specific objectives .............................................. 46 7.2. Efficiency and proportionality ................................................................................... 48 7.3. Coherence ................................................................................................................... 49 8. The preferred option .......................................................................................................... 50 9. How would actual impacts be monitored and evaluated? ................................................. 53 Annex 1 – Procedural information ........................................................................................... 55 1.1. Lead DG, Decide Planning/CWP references ............................................................ 55 1.2. Organisation and timing ............................................................................................ 55 1.3. Consultation of the RSB ............................................................................................ 55 1.4. Evidence, sources and quality ................................................................................... 57 Annex 2 – Stakeholder consultation ......................................................................................... 59 2.1. General stakeholder consultations ............................................................................. 59 2.2. Public consultation .................................................................................................... 61 Annex 3 – Who is affected by the initiative and how .............................................................. 70 3.1. Practical implications of the initiative ....................................................................... 70 2 3.2. Summary of costs and benefits .......................................................................................... 72 3.3. Detailed discussion on road safety problem drivers .................................................. 73 3.3.1. Slow market uptake of new safety features in the vehicle fleet ............................. 73 3.3.2. Outdated safety exemptions for SUVs, MPVs, vans and the like .......................... 74 Annex 4 – Analytical models used in preparing the impact assessment. ................................. 76 4.1. Description of analytical models used ...................................................................... 76 4.1.1. PRIMES-TREMOVE transport model ................................................................... 76 4.1.2. TRL model ............................................................................................................. 77 4.1.3. COWI model .......................................................................................................... 81 4.1.4. PRIMES-TREMOVE, TRL and COWI models role in the impact assessment .... 84 4.2. Baseline scenario ......................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Green Driver: Driving Behaviors Revisited on Safety
    ARCHIVES OF TRANSPORT ISSN (print): 0866-9546 Volume 47, Issue 3, 2018 e-ISSN (online): 2300-8830 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.6507 GREEN DRIVER: DRIVING BEHAVIORS REVISITED ON SAFETY Nurul Hidayah Binti MUSLIM1, Arezou SHAFAGHAT2, Ali KEYVANFAR3, Mohammad ISMAIL4 1,4 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia 2,3 MIT-UTM MSCP Program, Institute Sultan Iskandar, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia 2,3 Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia 3 Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial, Calle Rumipamba s/n y Bourgeois, Quito, Ecuador 3 Center for Energy Research, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, USA Contact: 2) [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: Interactions between road users, motor vehicles, and environment affect to driver’s travel behavior; however, frailer of proper interaction may lead to ever-increasing road crashes, injuries and fatalities. The current study has generated the green driver concept to evaluate the incorporation of green driver to negative outcomes reduction of road transportation. The study aimed to identify the green driver’s behaviors affecting safe traveling by engaging two research phases. Phase one was to identify the safe driving behaviors using Systematic literature review and Content Analysis methods. Phase one identified twenty-four (24) sub-factors under reckless driving behaviors cluster, and nineteen (19) sub-factors under safe driving practice cluster. Second phase was to establish the actual weight value of the sub-factors using Grounded Group Decision Making (GGDM) and Value Assignment (VA) methods, in order to determine the value impact of each sub-factor to green driving.
    [Show full text]
  • Toyota Motor Corp
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 20-F Annual and transition report of foreign private issuers pursuant to sections 13 or 15(d) Filing Date: 2021-06-24 | Period of Report: 2021-03-31 SEC Accession No. 0001193125-21-197902 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/ Mailing Address Business Address TOYOTA MOTOR SALES 1 TOYOTA CHO TOYOTA CIK:1094517| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:M0 | Fiscal Year End: 0331 USA INC CITY Type: 20-F | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-14948 | Film No.: 211040557 6565 HEADQUARTERS AICHI PREFECTURE SIC: 3711 Motor vehicles & passenger car bodies DRIVE W1-3A 471-8571 PLANO TX 75024 JAPAN M0 00000 81-565-28-2121 Copyright © 2021 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document Table of Contents As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 24, 2021 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) ☐ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: March 31, 2021 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ☐ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 001-14948 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION (Translation of registrants
    [Show full text]
  • TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE NV/SA Information Pursuant to REACH
    TOYOTA MOTOR EUROPE NV/SA Information pursuant to REACH Article 33 Article 33 of the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and restriction of Chemicals) Regulation states that customers must be informed about the presence of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs) in our products, in order to guarantee their safe use. TOYOTA supports the goals of REACH, which are consistent with our own commitments to promote the responsible manufacturing, handling, use and disposal of our products. Based on the information we received from our suppliers, the SVHCs that may be present in component articles of your Toyota Avensis in concentrations above 0.1% by weight are shown in the table below. Please be aware that, where present in your vehicle, the SVHCs listed below are incorporated in such a way that the risk to humans or the environment can be excluded as long as the vehicle and its parts are used as intended. Every Toyota and Lexus vehicle is provided with an owner’s manual that describes the safe use of our products. Substance name CAS number Component article 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic 68648-93-1 Seat acid, mixed decyl and hexyl and octyl diesters 2-Ethoxyethanol 110-80-5 Spoiler, Rr Lamp Acrylamide 79-06-1 Transmission Control, Lock Cylinder, Wire Harness, Body Switch, Chassis Switch, Lane Recognition, Driving Support, Cruise Control, Push Start, Engine Control, Security, Wireless Door Lock Aluminium oxide fibers 142844-00-6 Sliding Roof Benzyl butyl phthalate 85-68-7 Seat Bis(2-ethylhexyl) 117-81-7 Engine Unmoving No.1, Engine phthalate
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Annual Report (42Nd Term)
    Annual Report For the year ended March 31, 2012 MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT Please accept our gratitude for your continued support. Below are some remarks on the report for FUJITSU TEN's 42nd term (April 2011 to March 2012). Takashi Shigematsu, President (1) Business Environment Looking at the economy this term, although overseas business conditions in ASEAN and so on were good, the Chinese economy is showing signs of uncertainty. Moreover, advanced economies on the whole have been stagnant. In Japan, impacts of the Great East Japan Earthquake and flooding in Thailand led to a temporary downturn in business. Although the economy displayed some signs of recovery thanks to the restoration of supply chains and so on, the positive developments were delayed somewhat due to overseas economic trends and the impact of dramatic appreciation in the yen. In the domestic automotive market, restoration of the eco car subsidy program helped boost car sales, while the complete transition to terrestrial digital broadcasting encouraged repurchase demand for navigation products and so on, however, this was not enough to bring about full-scale recovery. Due to the effects of the Great East Japan Earthquake and flooding in Thailand, clients of automotive makers had to suspend operations and supply chains were severed, thus leading to reduced sales and production for FUJITSU TEN. Moreover, against a background of advancing price reduction for navigation products, intensifying competition with rival companies, dramatic and record-breaking appreciation of the yen and stagnation of the Japanese car market, which is our primary sales area, we were unfortunately unable to recover our sales figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018|Corporate Data
    Table of Contents Message from the President Toward the Mobility Society of the Future Initiatives for Sustainable Growth Corporate Data Corporate Data At a Glance History Financial Summary Non-Automotive Business Corporate/Stock Information At a Glance Number of Plants and Global Perspective/Data by Region Distributors* R&D Sites* Number of Employees Manufacturing Companies* (As of March 31, 2018) (As of March 31, 2018) (As of March 31, 2018) *Number of bases for Toyota and Lexus brands 369,124 (Consolidated, as of March 31, 2018) Other North Asia Europe America Europe Japan North Asia Japan 10 America 8 excluding Japan 29 24 17 5 3 Total Vehicle Production 3 21 — Other 8,964,133 (Consolidated, FY 2018) 4 6 8 114 0 Financial Highlights Total Vehicle Sales Net Revenues Operating Income Net Income Total Vehicle Sales for the Year Ended 8,964,394 8,964 thousand ¥29,379.5 billion ¥2,399.8 billion ¥2,493.9 billion March 31, 2018 (Consolidated, FY 2018) (Consolidated) -7 thousand +6.5% +20.3% +36.2% The second of each pair of Total Liquid Assets (net) Total Shareholder Return (max) R&D Expenses Capital Expenditures fi gures is the year-on-year change. ¥8,025.9 billion ¥1,200.1 billion ¥1,064.2 billion ¥1,302.7 billion +¥262.9 billion +¥117.7 billion +¥26.7 billion +¥90.9 billion 46 TOYOTA Annual Report 2018 Table of Contents Message from the President Toward the Mobility Society of the Future Initiatives for Sustainable Growth Corporate Data Corporate Data At a Glance History Financial Summary Non-Automotive Business Corporate/Stock Information
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L 315 of the European Union
    Official Journal L 315 of the European Union ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ Volume 57 English edition Legislation 1 November 2014 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1170/2014 of 29 October 2014 correcting the Slovenian version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/2008 implementing Council Directives 90/426/EEC and 90/427/EEC as regards methods for the identification of equidae (1) 1 ★ Commission Regulation (EU) No 1171/2014 of 31 October 2014 amending and correcting Annexes I, III, VI, IX, XI and XVII to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (1) .................. 3 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1172/2014 of 31 October 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables ...................... 13 DECISIONS 2014/768/EU: ★ Commission Implementing Decision of 30 October 2014 establishing the type, format and frequency of information to be made available by the Member States on integrated emission management techniques applied in mineral oil and gas refineries, pursuant to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2014) 7517) (1) .............................................................................................................. 15 2014/769/EU: ★ Commission Implementing Decision of 30 October 2014 confirming or amending the average specific emissions of CO2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of new light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2013 pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under document C(2014) 7863) ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf: 660 Kb / 236
    As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) ‘ REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended: March 31, 2017 OR ‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ‘ SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 001-14948 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION (Translation of Registrant’s Name into English) Japan (Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City Aichi Prefecture 471-8571 Japan +81 565 28-2121 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Nobukazu Takano Telephone number: +81 565 28-2121 Facsimile number: +81 565 23-5800 Address: 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture 471-8571, Japan (Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and address of registrant’s contact person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class: Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: American Depositary Shares* The New York Stock Exchange Common Stock** * American Depositary Receipts evidence American Depositary Shares, each American Depositary Share representing two shares of the registrant’s Common Stock. ** No par value. Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Toyota in the World 2011
    "Toyota in the World 2011" is intended to provide an overview of Toyota, including a look at its latest activities relating to R&D (Research & Development), manufacturing, sales and exports from January to December 2010. It is hoped that this handbook will be useful to those seeking to gain a better understanding of Toyota's corporate activities. Research & Development Production, Sales and Exports Domestic and Overseas R&D Sites Overseas Production Companies North America/ Latin America: Market/Toyota Sales and Production Technological Development Europe/Africa: Market/Toyota Sales and Production Asia: Market/Toyota Sales and Production History of Technological Development (from 1990) Oceania & Middle East: Market/Toyota Sales and Production Operations in Japan Vehicle Production, Sales and Exports by Region Overseas Model Lineup by Country & Region Toyota Group & Supplier Organizations Japanese Production and Dealer Sites Chronology Number of Vehicles Produced in Japan by Model Product Lineup U.S.A. JAPAN Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North Head Office Toyota Technical Center America, Inc. Establishment 1954 Establishment 1977 Activities: Product planning, design, Locations: Michigan, prototype development, vehicle California, evaluation Arizona, Washington D.C. Activities: Product planning, Vehicle Engineering & Evaluation Basic Research Shibetsu Proving Ground Establishment 1984 Activities: Vehicle testing and evaluation at high speed and under cold Calty Design Research, Inc. conditions Establishment 1973 Locations: California, Michigan Activities: Exterior, Interior and Color Design Higashi-Fuji Technical Center Establishment 1966 Activities: New technology research for vehicles and engines Toyota Central Research & Development Laboratories, Inc. Establishment 1960 Activities: Fundamental research for the Toyota Group Europe Asia Pacific Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA Toyota Motor Asia Pacific Engineering and Manfacturing Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • CO2 Emissions Performance of Car Manufacturers in 2011
    CO2 emissions performance of car manufacturers in 2011 Executive summary Executive summary The European Environment Agency (EEA) is For evaluating the progress of manufacturers supporting the European Commission in the towards their targets, the EEA is collecting and monitoring of the CO2 performance of passenger cars, quality checking data on CO2 emissions from in accordance with the Regulation (EC) 443/2009. This passenger cars registered in all Member States of Regulation sets an emission target for new passenger the European Union since 2010. Using the Member cars for the year 2015 (130 g CO2/km) — phased in State data, this note provides an overview of the from 2012 — and for the year 2020 (95 g CO2/km). performance of cars manufacturers in meeting their Starting from 2012, a specific binding CO2 target is CO2 emissions targets. calculated for each manufacturer every year based on the average mass of its fleet (Annex 1). In July 2012, Data collected reveal that in 2011 the majority of the Commission proposed to amend the regulation the car manufacturers are already well on track to with a view to defining the modalities for reaching achieve the CO2 emission target set for 2012. the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars. CO2 emissions performance of car manufacturers in 2011 3 Calculating the CO2 emissions performance of car manufacturers 1 Calculating the CO2 emissions performance of car manufacturers 1.1 CO average specific emissions To reduce CO2 emissions in the road transport 2 sector, the European Parliament and the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 443/2009 introducing Average specific emissions of CO2 are calculated as a mandatory CO2 emission performance standards for weighted average of the manufacturer's fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Toward a Sustainable Future
    Driving Toward a Sustainable Future 2019 Corporate Sustainability Report Contents 3 INTRODUCTION 36 PRODUCTS 4 CEO Letter 37 Safety Products Visteon Corporation has a longstanding commitment to 5 Our Commitment 38 Autonomous Driving Technology corporate sustainability and citizenship. In support of this 6 Leadership Principles commitment, we are providing this report as a summary 7 Company Profile 39 SUPPLY CHAIN of the company’s corporate responsibility activities. 40 Supplier Sustainability Included are highlights of company initiatives, practices 8 Sustainability Strategy 41 Strategic Supplier Award and achievements related to ethics and governance, 9 Industry Associations environment, health and safety, products, supply chain, 10 Awards 42 QUALITY quality and our people. 13 ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE 43 Quality Policy Visteon is focused on leading the digital revolution in 14 Ethics and Integrity Policy 44 Visteon Quality Awards cockpit electronics, delivering key product platforms that 15 Code of Basic Working Conditions are essential to the cockpit of the future. As a technology- 45 PEOPLE 16 Conflict Minerals driven company focused on cockpit electronics that 46 Employee Engagement 17 Governance – Board of Directors address the digital, electric and autonomous evolution, 47 Learning and Development Visteon has a world-class workforce and an unwavering 48 Leadership Programs dedication to corporate sustainability. 18 ENVIRONMENT 20 Energy Team 49 Diversity and Inclusion 21 Sustainability Programs 50 Diversity Successes 22 Environmental Metrics 51 Employee Resource Groups 24 Environmental Successes 52 Community Outreach 26 CDP Reports 53 Community Successes 27 HEALTH AND SAFETY 29 Metrics 31 Health and Safety Successes 32 Zero Injury Facilities 33 2018 Target Performance 35 2019 Targets 2 INTRODUCTION CEO Letter Responsibly Leading the Digital Cockpit Revolution Our environmental performance also continues to improve Visteon is committed to the highest levels of sustainability across our manufacturing operations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Human Rights Risks & Due Diligence in The
    THE SHIFTING GEARS REPORT: An Assessment of Human Rights Risks & Due Diligence in the Automotive Industry JUNE 2020 Mary Beth Gallagher & Gina Falada Research & Company Profiles Written by: Sara E. Murphy Edited by: Heidi Welsh TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Company Assessment Results .............................................................................................................................. 12 Key Points from Company Profiles ....................................................................................................................... 16 Overview of Human Rights Risks in the Automotive Industry ............................................................................... 20 Salient Human Rights Issues for the Automotive Sector ........................................................................................ 24 Investor Call to Action ......................................................................................................................................... 30 Sector Specific Strategies to Support Effective Human Rights Due Diligence ........................................................ 32 Recommendations for Automotive Sector Companies on Human Rights Due Diligence .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Business That Has Served Customers and Community for More Than 60 Years Is Always Here for You!
    WHY CHOOSE US? The family business that has served customers and community for more than 60 years is always here for you! Make Us Your Dealer Of Choice! Internet Value Pricing Convenient Service Hours Shuttle Service Selection We strive to offer a fair, We value your time, and Our goal is to make Our selection of new and competitive price on all realize that sometimes every visit to our facility pre-owned inventory is a of our vehicles. We weekends are the most an efficient and product of partnering with encourage our convenient to take care of enjoyable experience. some of the most customers to do the certain tasks. That’s why Enjoy our competitive brands in the research - we are here to our Service Department is complimentary shuttle market - and the hard work help you find the open from 8 a.m. - 2 p.m. service or our Courtesy of our inventory specialists. vehicle and payment every Saturday. Loaner Program on We are here to help you find that works for your life! your next service visit! your ideal vehicle! Expertise Free Car Washes! Trust in Your Choice We Buy Cars! Our technicians are We hope you enjoy your We only want to offer Not in the market to factory trained and ASE vehicle every day as much the best in vehicle purchase currently? We buy master certified; we as you do the day you selection to our cars even if you don’t sell us feature a state-of-the-art purchase it! Our customers. That’s why yours! We are always Body Shop where we renowned car washes are we stand behind the seeking the best in inventory, complete repairs on all free at any of our three quality of our inventory.
    [Show full text]