An Annotated Leśniewski Bibliography

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Annotated Leśniewski Bibliography An Annotated Leśniewski Bibliography V. Frederick Rickey Professor Emeritus Department of Mathematical Sciences United States Military Academy West Point, NY 10996 November 18, 2019 At the urging of friends and colleagues, I prepared An Annotated Leśniewski Bibliography (pp. 1– 39), which was distributed in July 1972. Four years later, in June of 1976, An Annotated Leśniewski Bibliography (Supplement I) (pp. 40–83) was distributed. All of this was further supplemented and revised in the spring of 1978 and eventually appeared in Stanisław Leśniewski: Collected Works, pp. 711–785 ( = Rickey 1992). Recently, my interest in the logical systems of Leśniewski has been rekindled and in December 2009, I began to gather more recent references pertaining to Leśniewski’s systems. The existence of the web has made this task infinitely easier than it was forty years ago. I would encourage all who use this bibliography to send me corrections and, especially, additions. This document is being prepared in TEX and it would be most helpful if you sent additions in this format, but documents in Word or HTML are perfectly acceptable (however .pdf format makes my life difficult as I then need to retype the information). You can most easily contact me via email: [email protected]. I would be pleased if you would also send me copies of your papers, for I am again trying to digest what has been written about Leśniewski and his logical systems, especially the more technical papers. V. Frederick Rickey Email: [email protected] http://fredrickey.info/ https://lesniewski.info 1 November 18, 2019 – 00 : 48 2 Abelson, Raziel 1967 “Definition,” pp. 314–324 in volume 2 of The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Aczel, Peter 1977 “An introduction to inductive definitions,” pp. 739–782 in the Handbook of Mathematical Logic, Dordrecht / Boston: Reidel, edited by Jon Barwise. Agazzi, Evandro, editor 1981 Modern Logic. A Survey: Historical, Philosophical and Mathematical Aspects of Modern Logic. Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel. Agapov, E. P. 1982 “Leśniewski’s conception of deductive systems,” (Russian), pp. 5–8 in Logical Analysis of Nat- ural Language (Abstracts of the 8th All-Union Conference “Logic and Methodology of Science”, Palanga, September 26–28, 1982, Vilinius. Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz (1890–1963) For a complete list of Ajdukiewicz’s publications, see Studia Logica, 16, 39–43. 1923 “O intencji pytania ‘co to jest P’, (Referat z odczytu),” Ruch Filozoficzny, 7 (1923), 152b–153a. 1926 “Załozenia logiki tradycyjnej” (Foundations of traditional logic), Przegląd Filozoficzny, 29 (1926), 200–229. The directive for distributing quantifiers that is discussed on page 210 is credited to Leśniewski. 1928 Główne zasady metodologii nauk i logiki formalnej. Wykłady Prof. D-ra K. Ajdukiewicza wygłoszone na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim w roku akad. 1927/28 (Skrypt autoryzowany. Zredagowa? M. Presburger) (Main Principles of the Methodology of Science and of Formal Logic. Lectures Given by Prof. Dr. K. Ajdukiewicz at Warsaw University in the Academic Year 1927/28 (Authorized Text. Edited by M. Presburger)). Wydawnictwa Koła Matematyczno- Fizycznego Słuchaczów Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, XVI. 304 pp. 1934a “W sprawie ‘uniwersaljow’,” Przegląd Filozoficzny, 37 (1934), 219–234. Reprinted in 1960, 169–210. Using Leśniewski’s theory of semantic categories, Ajdukiewicz refutes Kotarbiński’s ‘proof’ of the non-existence of individuals. He introduces here, for the first time, a convenient notation for the designation of particular semantical categories. 1934b “Logistyczny antyirracjonalizm w Polsce,” Przegląd Filozoficzny, 37 (1934), 399–408. German translation: 1935a. 1934c “Logiczne podstawy nauczania,” Offprint from Encyklopedii Wychowania (Encyclopeia of Ed- ucation), Warszawa: Nasza Ksiegarnia, 79 pp. November 18, 2019 – 00 : 48 3 1935a “Der logistische Antiirrationalismus in Polen,” Erkenntnis, 5 (1935), 151–161. Translation of 1934b. The bibliography is on pp. 199-203. Contains interesting historical remarks about the Polish school of logic. 1935b “Die syntaktische Konnexität,” Studia Philosophica, 1 (1935), 1–27. Reviewed by Weinberg, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 3, 58. English translation in McCall 1967. Partial English trans- lation in the Review of Metaphysics, 20, 635–647. The seminal paper on the application of the famous fractional notation for semantical cate- gories to ordinary language. 1949 “On the notion of existence. Some remarks connected with the problem of idealism,” Studia Philosophica, 4 (for 1949–50, published 1951), 7–22. Reviewed by Quine, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 17, 141-142. Reprinted in Ajdukiewicz 1978. Ajdukiewicz considers several kinds of existence and applies them to the question of fictitious objects and also to the metaphysical controversy over what is real. He uses Leśniewski’s on- tology to discuss the notions of real and intentional existence. In the review, Quine interprets ontology in set theory and thus concludes that quantification commits Leśniewski to abstract entities. 1960 Język i poznanie (Language and Knowledge), Warsaw, vol. 1, 1960, vol. 2, 1965. Selected papers from 1920–1939 and 1945–1963. Contains a reprint of his 1934b and Polish translations of 1935b and 1949. 1967 “Syntactic connexion,” pp. 207–231 in McCall 1967. English translation of 1935b. 1967a “On syntactical coherence,” The Review of Metaphysics, 20 (4), June 1967, 635–647. Partial English translation of 1935b by Peter T. Geach. JSTOR Geach, who spoke accurate but slow Polish, translated this from the reprint in Ajdukiewicz 1960. He judged parts II and III of the paper, which dealt with quantifiers, to be “complicated and unsatisfactory,” and so omitted them. Ajdukiewicicz attributes the term ‘semantical category’ to Husserel 1900, but remarks that he has adopted the ‘simple account’ of them developed by Leśniewski. He notes that the word ‘functor’ was coined by Kotarbiński. Need reference to K. 1973 Problems and Theories of Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reviewed by Giedymin, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25, 189–206. A basic philosophy text. The problem of ideal objects is treated. 1978 The Scientific World-perspective and Other Essays, 1931–1963, Dordrecht / Boston: Reidel. Edited by Jerzy Giedymin. Reviewed by Josef Miroslaw Zycinski in The Review of Meta- physics, 31(4), June 1978, pp. 662-663. Giedymin’s introduction contains biographical information. A bibliography of the works of Ajdukiewicz is included, 22 of which are in this volume, including a reprint of his 1949. 2013 “Minutae. Autobiografia i eseje z pocz?tku lat dwudziestych,” (Minutiae. Autobiography and Essays from the Beginning of the Twenties), Filozofia Nauki (Philosophy of Science), 2(82)/2013. 159–184. November 18, 2019 – 00 : 48 4 Summary: The collection contains five short texts written by Ajdukiewicz in the years 1920– 1924. The curriculum vitae from 1924 includes, inter alia, the authorÕs account of his soldier years during the First World War. The second text (a summary of a lecture for The Polish Philosophical Society) is concerned with the distinction between the absolute and relative time. Texts 3 and 4 are in praise of Łukasiewicz’s three-valued logic as a contribution to the theory of human freedom. The last text — written in a casual, ‘Cartesian’ style — presents epistemological problems one faces in trying to distinguish dreams from reality Andrews, Peter 1963 “A reduction of the axioms for the theory of propositional types,” Fundamenta Mathematicae, 52 (1963), 345–350. Reviewed by J. R. Guard, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 30, 385. A simplification of Henkin 1963. Angelelli, Ignacio 1967 Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy, Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel. Leśniewski had “the only philosophical acceptable manner of planning a ‘way out’ of the antinomies.” (p. 218) 1975 “Freges Ort in der Begriffsgeschichte,” pp. 9–22 in Frege und die moderne Grundlagenforschung, edited by C. Thiel, Meisenheim am Gland: Verlag Anton Hain. Anellis, Irving H. 1996 “Józef Maria Bocheński (1902–1995),” Modern Logic Volume 6, Number 2 (April 1996), 192– 196. Apostel, Leo 1960 “Logic and ontology,” Logique et Analyse, 3 (1960), #11–12, 202–225. Apostel claims that for Leśniewski and Heinrich Scholz, logic was ontology (in the philosoph- ical sense). Claims that Leśniewski 1930a states that “the science of logic has quite explicitly as its object the study of certain very general laws of being” (quoting Apostel, who does not quote Leśniewski). Cites Lejewski 1954b and 1958b as clear explanations of Leśniewski’s position. The discussion ends by saying that Leśniewski defines existence to exclude the null class and then goes on to make some incomprehensible remarks about methodology. 1976 “Mereology, time, action and meaning,” pp. 189–233 in Festschrift Gerhard Frey Zum 60. Geburtstag, Innsbruck. Arai, Yoshinari 1966 “On axiom systems of propositional calculi, XVII,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, 42 (1966), 351–354. Have copy. Deals with the equivalential calculus. Arai, Yoshinari and Tanaka, Shotaro November 18, 2019 – 00 : 48 5 1966a “On axiom systems of propositional calculi, XIX,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, 42, 358–360. Provides several single axioms for the equivalential calculus. 1966b “A remark on propositional calculi with variable functors,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, 42, 1056–1057. Reviewed by B. Lercher, MR 35 #4089. The title refers to the system of Les’s protothetic in Meredith 1951. The authors derive several equivalences in that system. Asenjo, Florencio G. 1962
Recommended publications
  • Guide to Proper Names and References in Gödel's “Protokolle
    Guide to proper names and references in Gödel’s “Protokolle” notebook People Abel Othenio Abel (1875-1946) professor of paleontology and paleobiology at the University of Vienna. Founder of the group of professors known as the “Bärenhöhle” that blocked the appointment and promotion of Jews Adele Adele Nimbursky, née Porkert (1899–1981), Gödel’s girlfriend, separated from her first husband; she and Gödel would marry in September 1938 Bachmann Friedrich Bachmann (1909–1982), mathematician, doctoral student of Scholz’s at Münster, where he received his Ph.D. in 1933; from 1935 at University of Marburg, as assistant then Privatdozent Behmann Heinrich Behmann (1891–1970), German mathematician; his reply to Perelman’s criticism of Gödel’s result had appeared in the journal Mind in April 1937. He was dismissed from his position at ​ ​ the University of Halle after the war for his Nazi Party activities Beer Gustav Beer, member of the Vienna Circle and Menger’s Mathematical Colloquium Benjamin Abram Cornelius Benjamin (1897–1968), American philosopher of science on the University of Chicago faculty 1932 to 1945 Bernays Paul Bernays (1888–1977), Swiss mathematician and logician; close collaborator with David Hilbert on the foundations of mathematics and the axiomatization of set theory Brentano Franz Brentano (1838-1917), resigned as priest, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Vienna, founder of Gestalt Brunsvick Egon Brunswik (1903–1955), Hungarian-born psychologist, assistant to Karl Bühler in Vienna, active member of Otto Neurath’s “Unity of Science” movement Bühler Karl Bühler (1879–1963), professor of psychology at the University of Vienna. He led an effort to reorganize Vienna’s city schools by incorporating scientific findings from child psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Wissenschaftsphilosophen Im Krieg - Impromptus
    Erschienen in: "Krieg der Gelehrten" und die Welt der Akademien 1914-1924 / Eckart, Wolfgang U.; Godel, Rainer (Hrsg.). - 1. Auflage. - Stuttgart : Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, 2016. - (Acta Historica Leopoldina ; 68). - „Kri eg der Gelehnen'' und di e Welt der Akademien 191 4-1924 S. 147-164. - ISBN 978-3-8047-3612-2 Wissenschaftsphilosophen im Krieg - Impromptus Gereon WOLTERS ML (Konstanz) Zusamnzenfassung Soweit deutsche Gelehrte nicht selbst im Felde standen, nahmen sie zumeist am Schreibti sch oder in öffent lichen Yortriigen akti v am Ersten Weltkrieg teil. Das gilt auch für die Phi losophen. Unter ihnen finden wir nicht weni ge ausgesprochene Kriegshetze r. Der vorliegende Beitrag untersucht (unter Rückgriff au f Korrespondenzen und Tage­ bucheinträge) di e im Entstehen begriffene Di szipli n der Wi ssenschaft sphilosophie. Die wichti gsten Wi ssenschafts­ ph ilosophen - die ältesten unter ihnen waren bei Kriegsbeginn 32 Jahre all - waren entweder naiv kriegsbegeistert (so zunächst Rudolf CA RNA P), oder Kriegsgegner (Moritz SCHLICK, Otto NEUR AT H und Han s REICHEN BAC H) oder komplett unpolitisch und mit sich selber beschäftigt (Hugo DI NGL ER ). Der spütere Wi ssenschaft sphilosoph Heinrich SCHOLZ, im Krieg noch Theologe, erweist sich al s der einzige Kriegspropagandist. - Das unter deutschen Gelehrten verbreitete und aggressionslcgit imi ercnde Gefühl der kollektiven Demtitigung durch den Rest der We lt weist beängs­ ti gende Parallelen zu Positionen von Gelehrten im heuti gen Ru ss land und zu weiten Teilen der islamischen Welt auf. Abstract: Not all Gcrman scholars served in thc armed forccs in thc Grcat War; many of thcm fought through their writings ancl s1>cechcs.
    [Show full text]
  • Esther Simpson - the Unknown Heroine
    From The Jewish Chronicle, 11 May 2017 https://www.thejc.com/news/news-features/esther-simpson-the-unknown-heroine- 1.438317?highlight=Simpson David Edmonds May 11, 2017 Esther Simpson - the unknown heroine The extraordinary story of how one woman offered refuge to philosophers, scientists and musicians fleeing from the Nazis, and in doing so reshaped the cultural and intellectual landscape of the Western World. It’s not clear how Professor Stanislaus Jolles died. The year was 1943 and he was in his mid-eighties. But did he die from natural causes, did he kill himself, or was he killed? He was a Jew living in Berlin, after the systematic extermination of Jews had already begun, so anything is possible. The fate of his wife, Adele, is documented. In the year of her husband’s passing, she was transported south from the German capital to Theresienstadt concentration camp in Czechoslovakia. She perished in 1944. She was Miss Simpson to strangers, Esther to colleagues, Tess to some of her close friends. And she had many, many friends, among whom she counted Ludwig Wittgenstein, often described as the greatest philosopher of the twentieth century. Wittgenstein had been acquainted with Stanislaus Jolles for over three decades, ever since he’d left his palatial Viennese home in 1906 to study engineering in Berlin. Professor and Mrs Jolles had been his hosts. Stanislaus was a mathematician who came to look upon Ludwig like a son; he and his wife called him ‘little Wittgenstein’. During World War I, when Wittgenstein was fighting for the Austrians on the Eastern Front, they furnished him with a constant supply of bread, fruit-cake, and cigarettes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany
    Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany Mathematicians Fleeing from Nazi Germany Individual Fates and Global Impact Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze princeton university press princeton and oxford Copyright 2009 © by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siegmund-Schultze, R. (Reinhard) Mathematicians fleeing from Nazi Germany: individual fates and global impact / Reinhard Siegmund-Schultze. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-691-12593-0 (cloth) — ISBN 978-0-691-14041-4 (pbk.) 1. Mathematicians—Germany—History—20th century. 2. Mathematicians— United States—History—20th century. 3. Mathematicians—Germany—Biography. 4. Mathematicians—United States—Biography. 5. World War, 1939–1945— Refuges—Germany. 6. Germany—Emigration and immigration—History—1933–1945. 7. Germans—United States—History—20th century. 8. Immigrants—United States—History—20th century. 9. Mathematics—Germany—History—20th century. 10. Mathematics—United States—History—20th century. I. Title. QA27.G4S53 2008 510.09'04—dc22 2008048855 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available This book has been composed in Sabon Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 10 987654321 Contents List of Figures and Tables xiii Preface xvii Chapter 1 The Terms “German-Speaking Mathematician,” “Forced,” and“Voluntary Emigration” 1 Chapter 2 The Notion of “Mathematician” Plus Quantitative Figures on Persecution 13 Chapter 3 Early Emigration 30 3.1. The Push-Factor 32 3.2. The Pull-Factor 36 3.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1803.01386V4 [Math.HO] 25 Jun 2021
    2009 SEKI http://wirth.bplaced.net/seki.html ISSN 1860-5931 arXiv:1803.01386v4 [math.HO] 25 Jun 2021 A Most Interesting Draft for Hilbert and Bernays’ “Grundlagen der Mathematik” that never found its way into any publi- Working-Paper cation, and 2 CVof Gisbert Hasenjaeger Claus-Peter Wirth Dept. of Computer Sci., Saarland Univ., 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany [email protected] SEKI Working-Paper SWP–2017–01 SEKI SEKI is published by the following institutions: German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI GmbH), Germany • Robert Hooke Str.5, D–28359 Bremen • Trippstadter Str. 122, D–67663 Kaiserslautern • Campus D 3 2, D–66123 Saarbrücken Jacobs University Bremen, School of Engineering & Science, Campus Ring 1, D–28759 Bremen, Germany Universität des Saarlandes, FR 6.2 Informatik, Campus, D–66123 Saarbrücken, Germany SEKI Editor: Claus-Peter Wirth E-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://wirth.bplaced.net Please send surface mail exclusively to: DFKI Bremen GmbH Safe and Secure Cognitive Systems Cartesium Enrique Schmidt Str. 5 D–28359 Bremen Germany This SEKI Working-Paper was internally reviewed by: Wilfried Sieg, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Dept. of Philosophy Baker Hall 161, 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213 E-mail: [email protected] WWW: https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/philosophy/people/faculty/sieg.html A Most Interesting Draft for Hilbert and Bernays’ “Grundlagen der Mathematik” that never found its way into any publication, and two CV of Gisbert Hasenjaeger Claus-Peter Wirth Dept. of Computer Sci., Saarland Univ., 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany [email protected] First Published: March 4, 2018 Thoroughly rev. & largely extd. (title, §§ 2, 3, and 4, CV, Bibliography, &c.): Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Oberwolfach Jahresbericht Annual Report 2008 Herausgeber / Published By
    titelbild_2008:Layout 1 26.01.2009 20:19 Seite 1 Oberwolfach Jahresbericht Annual Report 2008 Herausgeber / Published by Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Direktor Gert-Martin Greuel Gesellschafter Gesellschaft für Mathematische Forschung e.V. Adresse Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH Schwarzwaldstr. 9-11 D-77709 Oberwolfach-Walke Germany Kontakt http://www.mfo.de [email protected] Tel: +49 (0)7834 979 0 Fax: +49 (0)7834 979 38 Das Mathematische Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach ist Mitglied der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft. © Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (2009) JAHRESBERICHT 2008 / ANNUAL REPORT 2008 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS / TABLE OF CONTENTS Vorwort des Direktors / Director’s Foreword ......................................................................... 6 1. Besondere Beiträge / Special contributions 1.1 Das Jahr der Mathematik 2008 / The year of mathematics 2008 ................................... 10 1.1.1 IMAGINARY - Mit den Augen der Mathematik / Through the Eyes of Mathematics .......... 10 1.1.2 Besuch / Visit: Bundesministerin Dr. Annette Schavan ............................................... 17 1.1.3 Besuche / Visits: Dr. Klaus Kinkel und Dr. Dietrich Birk .............................................. 18 1.2 Oberwolfach Preis / Oberwolfach Prize ....................................................................... 19 1.3 Oberwolfach Vorlesung 2008 .................................................................................... 27 1.4 Nachrufe ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Frege in Context
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9(3) 2001:557– 570 REVIEW ARTICLE FREGE IN CONTEXT Nikolay Milkov Gottfried Gabriel und Wolfgang Kienzler (eds). Frege in Jena. Beiträge zur Spurensicherung . (Kritisches Jahrbuch der Philosophie , Band 2). Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1997, pp.161. Pb. DM 28. ISBN 3826014405 Gottfried Gabriel und Uwe Dathe (eds). Gottlob Frege. Werk und Wirkung. Paderborn, Mentis, 2000, pp.313. Pb. DM 30. ISBN 3897850850 REWRITING FREGE’S BIOGRAPHY English-speaking philosophers know little about Frege’s life. In 1972 T. W. Bynum published ‘On the Life and Work of Gottlob Frege’, an introduction of fty-four pages to his translation of the Begriffsschrift , in which various facts about Frege’s life were cited. These notes are still being used as a guide to Frege’s biography today – as in Anthony Kenny’s recent book Frege (see Kenny 1995, p. 1 n.). Apparently, many writers on Frege have never heard about a complete revolution in investigating Frege’s biography that took place in the 1990s in Germany, falsifying almost every sentence in Bynum’s piece. The two volumes under review – I shall refer to them as Spurensicherung and Wirkung for brevity – which are the outcome of two symposia on Frege held at the University of Jena, form the pinnacle of this biographical makeover. Indeed, from 1979 on, four such symposia had already taken place in Jena, resulting in three volumes of proceedings in each of which new data pertaining to Frege’s biography were contained. What is new in 1 I use the term ‘East German’ here, following the tradition established during the Cold War, when Germany was divided into two parts, usually known in English as East and West Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Gotthard Günther: Leben Und Werk
    Joachim Castella Gotthard Günther : Leben und Werk Diese Arbeit wurde von Joachim Castella ausgeführt als erste von zwei umfangreichen Studien im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes 'Theorie komplexer biologischer Systeme'. Autopoiesis und Polykontexturalität: Formalisation, Operativierung und Modellierung. Gefördert von der Volkswagenstiftung im Rahmen des Wettbewerbs Biowissenschaften (Leitung: Dr. Rudolf Kaehr und Prof. Dr. Eberhard von Goldammer) an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum—siehe dazu auch Joachim Paul (Hrsg.), Anmoderation der Sommer-Edition 2007, www.vordenker.de The text was originally edited and rendered into PDF file for the e-journal <www.vordenker.de> by E. von Goldammer Copyright 2007 @ Joachim Castella This material may be freely copied and reused, provided the author and sources are cited How to cite this article: Castella, J., Gotthard Günther: Leben und Werk, www.vordenker.de (Sommer 2007 Edition), Joachim Paul (ed.), URL :<http://www.vordenker.de> ISSN 1619-9324 Joachim Castella Gotthard Günther: Leben und Werk Erstes Kapitel: Lesen – Stellen – Bauen 1 Das Hymen des Textes 1 Dopplungen 4 Positionen und Perspektiven 7 Die Monotonie der Kritik 12 Ins Outback der Tradition 16 Das Schisma der Moderne 20 Die Sprache des Jenseits 23 Dekonstruktive Lektüre 28 Baustellen 32 Zweites Kapitel: Zwischen den Stühlen 36 Ab urbe condita 36 Zeitgeister 39 Der zerbrochene Krug der Logik 43 Auf ins letzte Gefecht 50 Ein Schritt mit Bedeutung 54 Die Spaltung in der Spaltung 59 Präliminarien des Unionsvertrages 64 Drittes Kapitel: Die neue
    [Show full text]
  • Dritten Reich”
    4. Mit Charakterst¨arke und Integrit¨at ubernommene¨ Verantwortung im “Dritten Reich” 4.1 Die ersten Jahre der nationalsozialistischen Diktatur Das Jahr 1933 begann mit der wohl folgenschwersten politischen Ver¨anderung Deutschlands (zumindest) im 20. Jahrhundert – der “Machtergreifung” durch die Nationalsozialisten am 30. Januar 77 78 1933: Reichskanzler Heinrich Bruning¨ , der aufgrund seiner strik- ten Sparpolitik ohnehin nicht popul¨ar war, verlor u. a. wegen der Osthilfeverordnung und des Verbots der SA die Unterstutzung¨ des Reichspr¨asidenten Paul von Hindenburg, fur¨ dessen am 10. April 1932 im zweiten Wahlgang (gegen Adolf Hitler und Ernst Th¨almann) erfolgte Wiederwahl er sich sehr stark engagiert hatte. Auf Betrei- ben des (parteilosen) Generals Kurt von Schleicher musste Bruning¨ am 30. Mai 1932 zurucktreten¨ – nach seinen eigenen Worten “hun- dert Meter vor dem Ziel”. Zu seinem Nachfolger ernannte Hinden- burg Franz von Papen79. Nach den Reichstagswahlen vom 6. No- vember 1932, aufgrund deren (ebenso wie bei der Reichstagswahl vom 31. Juli 1932) wiederum keine arbeitsf¨ahige Koalition m¨oglich war, trat das Kabinett Papen am 17. November 1932 zuruck.¨ Nach ergebnislosen Verhandlungen mit Hitler wurde Schleicher am 3. De- zember 1932 zum Reichskanzler berufen und mit der Bildung eines Pr¨asidialkabinetts beauftragt. Hinter seinem Rucken¨ verhandelte je- doch Papen am 22. Januar 1933 im Auftrage Hindenburgs mit Hitler uber¨ dessen Berufung zum Reichskanzler. Nach einem Gespr¨ach mit 77 Der Anfang dieses Abschnitts ist aus Jurgen¨ Elstrodt, Norbert Schmitz: Geschichte der Mathematik an der Universit¨at Munster,¨ Teil I: 1773 – 1945, Munster,¨ 2008, S. 54 ff., ubernommen.¨ 78 Geboren am 26. November 1885 in Munster,¨ Abitur am Gymnasium Pauli- num; in der Weimarer Republik fuhrender¨ Vertreter der Zentrumspartei.
    [Show full text]
  • Beth and Scholz∗
    Moral Integrity during a Difficult Period: Beth and Scholz∗ [Philosophia Scientiae (Nancy) 3 (4) (1998/1999), 151-173. Special issue: Un logicien consciencieux. La philosophie de Evert Willem Beth.] Volker Peckhaus Institut f¨urPhilosophie der Universit¨atErlangen-N¨urnberg Bismarckstr. 1, D{91054 Erlangen E-mail: [email protected] February 7, 2000 1 Introduction Willem Evert Beth started his academic career as a philosopher of mathe- matics in the mid 1930's, and it should be noted that his approach to this subject at the borderline between philosophy and mathematics was more philosophical than mathematical. It was an ambivalent time, but extremely exciting for scientists working in the area. In their recollections logicians of the time called it the \heroic era." The era lasted, as Georg Henrik von Wright was convinced (von Wright 1993, 21), from 1879 to 1934. This pe- riod was marked by Gottlob Frege's Begriffsschrift (Frege 1879) and the first volume of David Hilbert and Paul Bernays's Grundlagen der Mathematik (Hilbert and Bernays 1934). It was, according to von Wright, relieved by an epoch which began with two incidents being themselves of heroic greatness (26): Kurt G¨odel'sresults concerning the incompleteness of formalized lan- guages and Alfred Tarski's semantic theory of truth. Hans Hermes, on the ∗Lecture delivered on 22nd April, 1998 at the conference \Evert Willem Beth and His Philosophical Friends: From Bernays to Boche´nski"(22nd to 24th April, 1998) in M´er´eville,France. I would like to thank Henk Visser (Haarlem) for his invaluable help in providing documents from the Beth papers, Kai F.
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle Volume 5, Number 2 Anna Brożek Editor in Chief Kevin C
    JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY MARIA KOKOSZYńSKa: BETWEEN THE LVOV-WARSAW SCHOOL AND THE VIENNA CIRCLE VOLUME 5, NUMBER 2 ANNA BROżEK EDITOR IN CHIEF KEVIN C. KLEMENt, UnIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Maria Kokoszyńska-Lutmanowa (1905–1981) was one of the EDITORIAL BOARD most outstanding female representatives of the Lvov-Warsaw ANNALISA COLIVA, UnIVERSITY OF MODENA AND UC IRVINE School. After achieving her PhD in philosophy under Kazimierz GaRY EBBS, INDIANA UnIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON Twardowski’s supervision, she was Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz’s as- GrEG FROSt-ARNOLD, HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES sistant. She was also influenced by Alfred Tarski whose results HENRY JACKMAN, YORK UnIVERSITY in semantics she analyzed and popularized. After World War SANDRA LaPOINte, MCMASTER UnIVERSITY II, she got the chair of logic in University of Wrocław and she CONSUELO PRETI, THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY organized studies in logic in this academic center. MARCUS ROSSBERG, UnIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT ANTHONY SKELTON, WESTERN UnIVERSITY In the 1930s, Kokoszyńska kept in contact with members of the MARK TEXTOR, KING’S COLLEGE LonDON Vienna Circle and became a kind of connecting factor between AUDREY YAP, UnIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Polish logicians and the Viennese group. In Poland, she pre- RICHARD ZACH, UnIVERSITY OF CALGARY sented the views of members of the Vienna Circle. In Vienna, REVIEW EDITORS she emphasized the results of her Polish colleagues. JULIET FLOYD, BOSTON UnIVERSITY CHRIS PINCOCK, OHIO STATE UnIVERSITY In the present paper, some of Kokoszyńska’s results connected with the matters discussed in the Vienna Circle are presented, ASSISTANT REVIEW EDITOR namely with the problem of metaphysics, the status of logic and SEAN MORRIS, METROPOLITAN STATE UnIVERSITY OF DenVER the idea of unity of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisaties En Genootschappen
    Organisaties en genootschappen. P. van Ulsen 7 november 2017 Inhoudsopgave 1 Wijsgeren sluiten de rijen —het interbellum 2 1.1 Beths denkbeelden over het belang van organisaties . 2 1.2 Nederlandse genootschappen . 11 1.2.1 Significa: in vogelvlucht . 12 1.2.2 Significa: denkbeelden. 19 1.2.3 Significa: Beths kritieken . 30 1.2.4 Significa: congressen en Synthese . 34 1.2.5 Internationale School voor Wijsbegeerte. 40 1.2.6 Genootschap voor Critische (Wetenschappelijke) Philosophie. 42 1.2.7 Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging van Wijsbegeerte . 45 1.2.8 Wiskundig Genootschap . 47 1.2.9 Akademie van Wetenschappen. 48 1.3 Internationale filosofische verenigingen . 50 1.3.1 Wiener Kreis: WK, Verein Ernst Mach, Berliner Gruppe . 50 1.3.2 Wiener Kreis: Nederland en de WK . 55 1.3.3 Wiener Kreis: Unity of Science Movement . 63 1.3.4 Institut International de (Collaboration) Philosophique. 67 1.3.5 Fed´ eration´ Internationale des Societ´ es´ de Philosophie. 69 2 Wetenschapsfilosofische organisaties —na WWII 70 2.1 Genootschappen ontstaan . 70 2.1.1 Societ´ e´ Internationale de Logique et de Philosophie des Sciences 70 2.1.2 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Logica. 72 2.1.3 UNESCO-organisaties: ICSU, CIPHS . 73 2.1.4 Kleinere organisaties: AIPS, IIST PSA, Phil.Sc.Group. 73 2.1.5 International Union of Philosophy of Science. 74 2.2 UIPS versus UIHS . 77 2.2.1 International Union of History of Sciences. 77 2.2.2 Association for Symbolic Logic. 81 2.3 Eenheid in Veelheid . 82 2.3.1 International Union of History and Philosophy of Sciences .
    [Show full text]