DOCSLIB.ORG

Esther Simpson - the Unknown Heroine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Esther Simpson - the Unknown Heroine From The Jewish Chronicle, 11 May 2017 https://www.thejc.com/news/news-features/esther-simpson-the-unknown-heroine- 1.438317?highlight=Simpson David Edmonds May 11, 2017 Esther Simpson - the unknown heroine The extraordinary story of how one woman offered refuge to philosophers, scientists and musicians fleeing from the Nazis, and in doing so reshaped the cultural and intellectual landscape of the Western World. It’s not clear how Professor Stanislaus Jolles died. The year was 1943 and he was in his mid-eighties. But did he die from natural causes, did he kill himself, or was he killed? He was a Jew living in Berlin, after the systematic extermination of Jews had already begun, so anything is possible. The fate of his wife, Adele, is documented. In the year of her husband’s passing, she was transported south from the German capital to Theresienstadt concentration camp in Czechoslovakia. She perished in 1944. She was Miss Simpson to strangers, Esther to colleagues, Tess to some of her close friends. And she had many, many friends, among whom she counted Ludwig Wittgenstein, often described as the greatest philosopher of the twentieth century. Wittgenstein had been acquainted with Stanislaus Jolles for over three decades, ever since he’d left his palatial Viennese home in 1906 to study engineering in Berlin. Professor and Mrs Jolles had been his hosts. Stanislaus was a mathematician who came to look upon Ludwig like a son; he and his wife called him ‘little Wittgenstein’. During World War I, when Wittgenstein was fighting for the Austrians on the Eastern Front, they furnished him with a constant supply of bread, fruit-cake, and cigarettes. In January 1939, six years after the Nazis had come to power, and two months after Kristallnacht, Wittgenstein posted a letter to her organization about his old landlords. He explained that he’d been contacted by Adele: her husband was desperate to spend the rest of his life in peace in England. Could a benefactor be found to support him, Wittgenstein asked, so that the Jolles would be allowed to travel? “I am well aware that it is practically hopeless to try to find such a benefactor”, he continued, “at the same time I can’t tell these people that their situation is absolutely hopeless, if there is even the smallest possible chance.” Tess Simpson replied almost immediately, as was her practice. This was not the first she had heard about this sad case. “Professor Einstein has already written to us about Professor Stanislaus Jolles, and we wish we were in a position to assist. However, our assistance is limited to the scholars and scientists who are still able to work, and for this purpose alone our funds are inadequate. It is impossible for us to take over cases of scholars who, however eminent in their day, are now of an age when they should be enjoying their pensions”. She was being straightforward. But the rejection sealed the fate of this octogenarian academic and his wife. Tess Simpson, and the organization she served with intense dedication, rejected applicants immediately if they failed to fulfil the basic qualifications or after carefully evaluating their CVs. But many hundreds of lives were saved, of scientists, philosophers, historians, artists, musicians and architects, who would go on to contribute immeasurably to intellectual and cultural life in the US and Britain. ••• Parentage of The Academic Assistance Council (AAC) is disputed. The Jewish- Hungarian physicist, Leo Szilard, deserves much of the credit. Szilard’s numerous accomplishments included being the first scientist to recognize the possibility of a nuclear chain reaction. He overflowed with ideas, scientific and otherwise, and buzzed around with so much energy that some people joked he could be in two places at once. Simpson, who met him through a mutual friend, the Viennese economist/sociologist Karl Polanyi, said he was like “an incessant fountain” and that once, after talking to her about the feasibility of an atomic bomb, “he spoke with equal enthusiasm about the prospect of getting fresh peaches out of a tin.” With Einstein, Szilard would persuade President Franklin D Roosevelt to launch the Manhattan Project, to beat the Nazis in the race to build the bomb. Several years earlier, immediately after the Nazis came to power, he conceived the notion of a university for exiles. Nothing came of it, but on a trip to Vienna he happened to stay in the same hotel as a British academic: a Liberal economist and progressive man-of-action, William Beveridge, Director of the London School of Economics and Political Science. And that sparked Beveridge into action. Beveridge, who would go on to transform Britain and its welfare system through the recommendations of his report on the reform of social welfare, had a different recollection, in which Szilard’s role is whitewashed. In his book, A Defence of Free Learning, written a quarter of a century later, he claimed that the idea for the Academic Assistance Council came as he was sitting in a Viennese coffee house in 1933, with fellow economists, including Ludwig von Mises. Hitler had become German Chancellor just a few weeks before. Von Mises read out the names, published in the evening paper, of a dozen Jewish academics sacked by the new German government. Outraged, Beveridge determined that something must be done. Back in the UK, he immediately got to work, raising money by appealing to faculty members of the LSE, many of whom donated generously. He also contacted other top scholars beyond his own institution. On 24 May, 1933, a letter, signed by renowned academics, among them seven Nobel laureates, was published in The Times. It announced the launch of the Academic Assistance Council, stating that its objective was “to raise a fund, to be used primarily, though not exclusively, in providing maintenance for displaced teachers and investigators, and finding them work in universities and scientific institutions”. One of the signatories, and one of the first to write a cheque in support, was John Maynard Keynes. Another was the New Zealand-born physicist and Nobel Prize winner, Ernest Rutherford who, after some vigorous cajoling by Beveridge, became the Society’s President. They deliberately excluded Jews from the executive, worrying that that might be off-putting to potential supporters. On 3 October, Einstein helped raise more funds when he addressed a packed Albert Hall on the subject of “Science and Civilisation”, urging the crowd to “resist the powers which threaten to suppress intellectual and individual freedom”. Beveridge was in no position to run the AAC on a day-to-day basis, though he evangelized for its mission in many talks delivered up and down the country. Two full-time officials were appointed. One was the Secretary, Walter Adam, a historian who would go on to become the director of the LSE. The second held the lowly status of Assistant Secretary. Secretaries tend not to be acknowledged in history books. This latter appointment was the more momentous. Her name was Tess Simpson. ••• Tess Simpson was born on 31 July, 1903 and grew up in Leeds, the youngest of four siblings; her father worked in the garment industry. She won a scholarship to study modern languages at Leeds University and gained a first. After graduating she spent a short period in Germany as a governess for a rich but tedious family, then had a spell in Paris before, in 1928, accepting a job at the International Fellowship of Reconciliation in Vienna, a body promoting reconciliation between former warring countries. She was in the Austrian capital until 1933; in her own words, she had “a marvellous few years”. She indulged in a life-long passion, music. She was an extremely gifted violinist, regularly joining in chamber music ensembles which in Vienna, she would later recall, was taken so much for granted that “it was like cleaning your teeth”. She described a Vienna Philharmonic concert of Mozart’s G Minor Symphony, conducted by Bruno Walter as the most memorable musical event of her life. In mid-1933, after she had moved to Geneva and a job at the World Alliance of YMCAs, a telex was wired to her at Szilard’s behest: “ACADEMIC COUNCIL HELPING GERMAN SCIENTISTS NAMELY SZILARDS WORK WANTS SECRETARY STOP IMPORTANT START NEXT MONDAY.” The position was back in London as Assistant Secretary of the Academic Assistance Council. She accepted, though unable to quite accommodate the ‘Next Monday’ directive. Her existing Swiss job was hardly well-remunerated; nevertheless, the AAC post, at 2 pounds 10 shillings a week, represented a massive pay cut. She began work on 17 July, 1933. For the AAC it was an inspired appointment, as Beveridge would write, “of lasting and growing importance”. She had a rare talent for organization, for friendship and for persuading people to do what she asked without provoking resentment. She also had the most astounding reserves of energy, resilience and patience. She would routinely work until 10pm when the gates outside their office were locked. After the Anschluss in March 1938 her workload increased further; she took no holiday for 13 years. All her life, said one of her future colleagues, “she worked preposterously hard”. The AAC initially operated out of two small rooms in the attic of a large house in Piccadilly, in central London. Although it was always short of money, it had a pot of funds to disperse, giving annual grants of £182 for single refugee academics and £250 for married ones. But the more important function was to act as a conduit between academics displaced by the Nazis and the British university sector, finding out their expertise and whether there was a university with a suitable department and a vacancy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rolf Tomas Nossum Oscar Buneman
    Rita Meyer-Spasche; Rolf Tomas Nossum Oscar Buneman (1913-1993), Persecutions and Patronages: a Case Study of Political Impact on Research IPP 5/136 April, 2015 Oscar Buneman (1913-1993), Persecutions and Patronages: a Case Study of Political Impact on Research Rita Meyer-Spasche, Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany [email protected] and Rolf Tomas Nossum, Department of Mathematics University of Agder, P.O.Box 422, N-4604 Kristiansand, Norway [email protected] Abstract We study scientific migration and patronage before and during the Second World War in the case of the student Oscar Buneman (1913-93), an eminent sci- entist later on. Our main source is the archive of the SPSL1. For those interested in Buneman2 these records are important because of informations not available elsewhere, for other historians because Buneman belonged to a minority, not well known and not investigated much: non-Jewish and non-communist, anti-Nazi active before and after emigration like Willy Brandt (1913-92) and others, but mainly interested in mathematics and its applications, not politics. Keywords: Scientific migration, scientific patronage, alien internment, Society for the Protection of Science and Learning, Oscar Buneman, computer simulation. MSC classification codes: 01A60, 01A74, 01A99, 65-03, 65Z05, 1 Introduction We study scientific migration and scientific patronage before and during the Second World War in the case of Oscar Buneman (n´eOscar B¨unemann, 1913-93), pioneer of the numerical simulation of plasmas and of the visualisation of computed results, still and animated, and founder of the field of computer simulation using particles.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Proper Names and References in Gödel's “Protokolle
    Guide to proper names and references in Gödel’s “Protokolle” notebook People Abel Othenio Abel (1875-1946) professor of paleontology and paleobiology at the University of Vienna. Founder of the group of professors known as the “Bärenhöhle” that blocked the appointment and promotion of Jews Adele Adele Nimbursky, née Porkert (1899–1981), Gödel’s girlfriend, separated from her first husband; she and Gödel would marry in September 1938 Bachmann Friedrich Bachmann (1909–1982), mathematician, doctoral student of Scholz’s at Münster, where he received his Ph.D. in 1933; from 1935 at University of Marburg, as assistant then Privatdozent Behmann Heinrich Behmann (1891–1970), German mathematician; his reply to Perelman’s criticism of Gödel’s result had appeared in the journal Mind in April 1937. He was dismissed from his position at ​ ​ the University of Halle after the war for his Nazi Party activities Beer Gustav Beer, member of the Vienna Circle and Menger’s Mathematical Colloquium Benjamin Abram Cornelius Benjamin (1897–1968), American philosopher of science on the University of Chicago faculty 1932 to 1945 Bernays Paul Bernays (1888–1977), Swiss mathematician and logician; close collaborator with David Hilbert on the foundations of mathematics and the axiomatization of set theory Brentano Franz Brentano (1838-1917), resigned as priest, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Vienna, founder of Gestalt Brunsvick Egon Brunswik (1903–1955), Hungarian-born psychologist, assistant to Karl Bühler in Vienna, active member of Otto Neurath’s “Unity of Science” movement Bühler Karl Bühler (1879–1963), professor of psychology at the University of Vienna. He led an effort to reorganize Vienna’s city schools by incorporating scientific findings from child psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Refugee Work in Britain, 1933–39
    Voluntary Refugee Work in Britain, 1933–39. An Overview by Susan Cohen Zusammenfassung Im Artikel wird die Arbeit von Flüchtlingskomitees untersucht, die sich in Großbritan- nien vor und während des Zweiten Weltkriegs gründeten und dort betätigten. Abstract The focus of this paper is of the work undertaken by refugee committees which were established and operating in Britain before and during the Second World War. The refugee crisis in Britain Following Hitler’s accession to power as German Chancellor in January 1933, many Germans, especially Jews, began to leave their homeland for safe havens abroad. Britain was one country where they sought refuge, and British offi- cials soon became concerned about the financial implications of an influx of destitute foreigners. In response, the Anglo-Jewish community, including the recently formed Central British Fund and the Jewish Refugees Committee (JRC), relieved the British government of all responsibility for refugees from Europe, by guaranteeing to take on the financial and social burden themselves. The situation was manageable until March 1938, when, following the An- schluss (annexation of Austria), there was a huge increase in the number of would-be refugees, putting an unsustainable burden on the community or- ganisations. In order to conserve their dwindling resources, they were forced to exclude future applicants, and to impose a selections process.1 There were already official restrictions in place to control the numbers allowed into the country, besides which a £50 guarantee was required for every person, to fund 1 London, Louise: Whitehall and the Jews 1933–48: British Immigration Policy and the Holocaust. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal BAS ^ Association of Jewish Refugees the Rescue of Refugee Scholars
    VOLUME 9 NO.2 FEBRUARY 2009 journal BAS ^ Association of Jewish Refugees The rescue of refugee scholars eventy-five years ago, in 1933, Robbins on the spot. The AAC, which was the Academic Assistance Council, essentially mn from within the academic known from 1936 as the Society for community in Britain, then came into being the Protection of Science and very quickly. SLeaming, was founded. The AAC/SPSL was In May 1933, a letter signed by a list of a remarkable body that played a unique part leading figures in British university and in the rescue of scholars and scientists, intellectual life was published in The Times, mostly Jewish, who had been dismissed by proposing the establishment of an organi­ the Nazis from their posts at German and sation to rescue the careers and lives of Austrian universities and whose livelihoods, displaced academics. The Council's initial and lives, were endangered. declaration was signed by over 40 of Brit­ After the passing of the Gesetz zur ain's most eminent men of scholarship, Wiederherstellung des Bemfsbeamtentums including John Maynard Keynes, Gilbert of 7 April 1933, aimed at removing racially Murray, the Presidents of the Royal Society and politically undesirable persons from and the British Academy, and 9 Chancel­ the civil service, something like a quarter Esther Simpson OBE lors or Vice-Chancellors of universities and of the academic staff at German sciences), an extraordinary record of 7 Masters or Directors of colleges. The universities and research institutes were academic achievement. celebrated scientist Lord Rutherford became dismissed, of whom some 2,000, or about The two principal initiators of the AAC the AAC's first president.
    [Show full text]
  • European Influences in the Fine Arts: Melbourne 1940-1960
    INTERSECTING CULTURES European Influences in the Fine Arts: Melbourne 1940-1960 Sheridan Palmer Bull Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree ofDoctor ofPhilosophy December 2004 School of Art History, Cinema, Classics and Archaeology and The Australian Centre The University ofMelbourne Produced on acid-free paper. Abstract The development of modern European scholarship and art, more marked.in Austria and Germany, had produced by the early part of the twentieth century challenging innovations in art and the principles of art historical scholarship. Art history, in its quest to explicate the connections between art and mind, time and place, became a discipline that combined or connected various fields of enquiry to other historical moments. Hitler's accession to power in 1933 resulted in a major diaspora of Europeans, mostly German Jews, and one of the most critical dispersions of intellectuals ever recorded. Their relocation to many western countries, including Australia, resulted in major intellectual and cultural developments within those societies. By investigating selected case studies, this research illuminates the important contributions made by these individuals to the academic and cultural studies in Melbourne. Dr Ursula Hoff, a German art scholar, exiled from Hamburg, arrived in Melbourne via London in December 1939. After a brief period as a secretary at the Women's College at the University of Melbourne, she became the first qualified art historian to work within an Australian state gallery as well as one of the foundation lecturers at the School of Fine Arts at the University of Melbourne. While her legacy at the National Gallery of Victoria rests mostly on an internationally recognised Department of Prints and Drawings, her concern and dedication extended to the Gallery as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Today 2009, Reproduced with Kind Permission of the the Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford
    A refuge for the persecuted, release for the fettered mind An organisation set up in 1933 to find work for refugee academics is still very much in business. Georgina Ferry reports. Seventy years ago, on 5 February 1939, the great and the good of Oxford poured into the Sheldonian to hear distinguished speakers address 'The Problem of the refugee Scholar'. The aim was to persuade the University and its colleges to open their hearts and their pockets to academics from countries where fascism had deprived them of their livelihood and of the opportunity to teach and research. On the platform was Lord Samuel, former Home Secretary and head of the Council for German Jewry, and Sir John Hope Simpson, the former Indian civil servant whose subsequent career as a colonial administrator had frequently focused on migration, forced and otherwise, in countries as diverse as Kenya and Palestine. Both were Balliol men. Distinguished Oxford figures including the Master of Balliol, A D Lindsay, the Provost of Oriel, Sir William David Ross, and the regius Professor of Medicine, Sir Edward Farquhar Buzzard - had worked indefatigably over the previous five years to create the conditions in which the University would be prepared to stage a high-profile event in such a cause. It all began in 1933, when Sir William Beveridge, then director of the London School of Economics (and subsequently Master of Univ), was on a study trip to Vienna. Reading in a newspaper that, since Adolf Hitler's recent rise to power, Jewish and other non-Nazi professors were losing their jobs in German universities, Beveridge returned to England and mobilised many of his influential friends to form the academic assistance Council (AAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Between the Lvov-Warsaw School and the Vienna Circle Volume 5, Number 2 Anna Brożek Editor in Chief Kevin C
    JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY MARIA KOKOSZYńSKa: BETWEEN THE LVOV-WARSAW SCHOOL AND THE VIENNA CIRCLE VOLUME 5, NUMBER 2 ANNA BROżEK EDITOR IN CHIEF KEVIN C. KLEMENt, UnIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Maria Kokoszyńska-Lutmanowa (1905–1981) was one of the EDITORIAL BOARD most outstanding female representatives of the Lvov-Warsaw ANNALISA COLIVA, UnIVERSITY OF MODENA AND UC IRVINE School. After achieving her PhD in philosophy under Kazimierz GaRY EBBS, INDIANA UnIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON Twardowski’s supervision, she was Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz’s as- GrEG FROSt-ARNOLD, HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES sistant. She was also influenced by Alfred Tarski whose results HENRY JACKMAN, YORK UnIVERSITY in semantics she analyzed and popularized. After World War SANDRA LaPOINte, MCMASTER UnIVERSITY II, she got the chair of logic in University of Wrocław and she CONSUELO PRETI, THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY organized studies in logic in this academic center. MARCUS ROSSBERG, UnIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT ANTHONY SKELTON, WESTERN UnIVERSITY In the 1930s, Kokoszyńska kept in contact with members of the MARK TEXTOR, KING’S COLLEGE LonDON Vienna Circle and became a kind of connecting factor between AUDREY YAP, UnIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Polish logicians and the Viennese group. In Poland, she pre- RICHARD ZACH, UnIVERSITY OF CALGARY sented the views of members of the Vienna Circle. In Vienna, REVIEW EDITORS she emphasized the results of her Polish colleagues. JULIET FLOYD, BOSTON UnIVERSITY CHRIS PINCOCK, OHIO STATE UnIVERSITY In the present paper, some of Kokoszyńska’s results connected with the matters discussed in the Vienna Circle are presented, ASSISTANT REVIEW EDITOR namely with the problem of metaphysics, the status of logic and SEAN MORRIS, METROPOLITAN STATE UnIVERSITY OF DenVER the idea of unity of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisaties En Genootschappen
    Organisaties en genootschappen. P. van Ulsen 7 november 2017 Inhoudsopgave 1 Wijsgeren sluiten de rijen —het interbellum 2 1.1 Beths denkbeelden over het belang van organisaties . 2 1.2 Nederlandse genootschappen . 11 1.2.1 Significa: in vogelvlucht . 12 1.2.2 Significa: denkbeelden. 19 1.2.3 Significa: Beths kritieken . 30 1.2.4 Significa: congressen en Synthese . 34 1.2.5 Internationale School voor Wijsbegeerte. 40 1.2.6 Genootschap voor Critische (Wetenschappelijke) Philosophie. 42 1.2.7 Algemene Nederlandse Vereniging van Wijsbegeerte . 45 1.2.8 Wiskundig Genootschap . 47 1.2.9 Akademie van Wetenschappen. 48 1.3 Internationale filosofische verenigingen . 50 1.3.1 Wiener Kreis: WK, Verein Ernst Mach, Berliner Gruppe . 50 1.3.2 Wiener Kreis: Nederland en de WK . 55 1.3.3 Wiener Kreis: Unity of Science Movement . 63 1.3.4 Institut International de (Collaboration) Philosophique. 67 1.3.5 Fed´ eration´ Internationale des Societ´ es´ de Philosophie. 69 2 Wetenschapsfilosofische organisaties —na WWII 70 2.1 Genootschappen ontstaan . 70 2.1.1 Societ´ e´ Internationale de Logique et de Philosophie des Sciences 70 2.1.2 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Logica. 72 2.1.3 UNESCO-organisaties: ICSU, CIPHS . 73 2.1.4 Kleinere organisaties: AIPS, IIST PSA, Phil.Sc.Group. 73 2.1.5 International Union of Philosophy of Science. 74 2.2 UIPS versus UIHS . 77 2.2.1 International Union of History of Sciences. 77 2.2.2 Association for Symbolic Logic. 81 2.3 Eenheid in Veelheid . 82 2.3.1 International Union of History and Philosophy of Sciences .
    [Show full text]
  • German-Speaking Émigré Neuroscientists in North America After 1933: Critical Reflections on Emigration-Induced Scientific Change
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Cumming School of Medicine Cumming School of Medicine Research & Publications 2010 German-speaking Émigré neuroscientists in north america after 1933: critical reflections on emigration-Induced scientific change Stahnisch, Frank W. Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Frank W. Stahnisch: "German-Speaking Émigré Neuroscientists in North America after 1933: Critical Reflections on Emigration-Induced Scientific Change". Preprint No. 403, Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany, 2010, 46 pp. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/48034 journal article Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 2010 PREPRINT 403 Frank W. Stahnisch German-Speaking Émigré Neuroscientists in North America after 1933: Critical Reflections on Emigration-Induced Scientific Change Dieser Text ist in einer überarbeiteten Form zur Publikation angenommen in: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, Band 21 (2010) [Themenheft 2010/3: Vertreibung von Wissenschaft, Hrsg.: Christian Fleck]. Der vorliegende Preprint erscheint mit freundlicher Erlaubnis der Journal-Herausgeberschaft und des StudienVerlags Innsbruck. Frank W. Stahnisch e-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] Frank W. Stahnisch Abstract: This paper endeavors to document and analyze
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Early Analytic Philosophy: Volume Volume 5, Number 2 Introduction Editor in Chief Maria Van Der Schaar and Eric Schliesser Kevin C
    JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY WOMEN IN EARLY ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY: VOLUME VOLUME 5, NUMBER 2 INTRODUCTION EDITOR IN CHIEF MARIA VAN DER SCHAAR AND ERIC SCHLIESSER KEVIN C. KLEMENt, UnIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS EDITORIAL BOARD ANNALISA COLIVA, UnIVERSITY OF MODENA AND UC IRVINE GaRY EBBS, INDIANA UnIVERSITY BLOOMINGTON GrEG FROSt-ARNOLD, HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES HENRY JACKMAN, YORK UnIVERSITY SANDRA LaPOINte, MCMASTER UnIVERSITY CONSUELO PRETI, THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY MARCUS ROSSBERG, UnIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT ANTHONY SKELTON, WESTERN UnIVERSITY MARK TEXTOR, KING’S COLLEGE LonDON AUDREY YAP, UnIVERSITY OF VICTORIA RICHARD ZACH, UnIVERSITY OF CALGARY REVIEW EDITORS JULIET FLOYD, BOSTON UnIVERSITY CHRIS PINCOCK, OHIO STATE UnIVERSITY ASSISTANT REVIEW EDITOR SEAN MORRIS, METROPOLITAN STATE UnIVERSITY OF DenVER DESIGN DaNIEL HARRIS, HUNTER COLLEGE JHAPONLINE.ORG SPECIAL ISSUE: WOMEN IN EARLY ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY © 2017 MARIA VAN DER SCHAAR AND ERIC SCHLIESSER EDITED BY MARIA VAN DER SCHAAR AND ERIC SCHLIESSER WOMEN IN EARLY ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY: movement in the more strict sense of analytic philosophy, and VOLUME INTRODUCTION they were educated at the centres of analytic philosophy of their time. If we focus on the period before World War II, centres of MARIA VAN DER SCHAAR AND ERIC SCHLIESSER analytic philosophy in the strict sense are to be found in Lvov, Warsaw, Vienna, Cambridge, and Harvard. Of these, perhaps, the inclusion of Harvard is controversial, but the paper by Giulia Felappi helps us to understand why it is legitimate to include The three women that form the focus of this special issue, Susan Harvard. Stebbing (1895–1943), Susanne Langer (1895–1985), and Maria We speak of the Lvov-Warsaw School, the Vienna Circle, and Kokoszyńska (1905–1981), belong to the first group of women the Cambridge School of Analysis, and of British analytic philos- who became recognized philosophers by obtaining a perma- ophy in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein and Hermann Broch: the Need for Fiction and Logic in Moral Philosophy Christopher Bailes Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 5-24-2012 Ludwig Wittgenstein and Hermann Broch: The Need for Fiction and Logic in Moral Philosophy Christopher Bailes Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Bailes, Christopher, "Ludwig Wittgenstein and Hermann Broch: The eN ed for Fiction and Logic in Moral Philosophy" (2012). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 681. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/681 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures Dissertation Examination Committee: Paul Michael Lützeler, Chair Julia Driver Matt Erlin Erin McGlothlin Gillian Russell Lynne Tatlock Ludwig Wittgenstein and Hermann Broch: The Need for Fiction and Logic in Moral Philosophy By Christopher Wade Bailes A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2012 Saint Louis, Missouri Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Department of Germanic Languages and Literatures and Washington University in Saint Louis for their generous financial support. My dissertation benefited from various guest lecturers, conferences, and graduate seminars supported by the university, and would not have been financially feasible without the tuition waivers and more than adequate living stipends that kept me afloat.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of Learning
    Reprinted from PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 169 In Defence of Learning I 102 Paul Broda ESTHER SIMPSON: A CORRESPONDENCE 103 From 1942 to 1944 both ES and EB were in Cambridge, where they all to dissuade you; I'm only rather sad at the suffering that is bound to be remained close friends until ES returned to London in 1944 to run the Society in front of you, and is inevitable really, for you go back a different person for Visiting Scientists (SVS).2 Their friendship continued after EB's return from the one who came over. You have not only lost a few illusions but you to Austria in 1947 until his death in 1983. EB only visited Britain once, in have gained new knowledge. Theoretically this ought to be all to the good, 1948, and after that he and ES met on only one occasion, in Yugoslavia in but .... You see, what I'm afraid of is that you will find the 'irrational, 1959. EB did not return to the UK because he supposed, correctly as MI5 mystic, pre-bourgeois' outlook you mention still all too widespread, and in files show, that he would be refused entry or even be detained and possibly pI aces where you will think it should not be. You may find yourself called charged under the Official Secrets Act. ES may have suspected this, but never a 'traitor' by enthusiasts without your knowledge, experience and love of allowed herself to confront the issue directly, either in correspondence with truth as truth. All love, Tess.
    [Show full text]