The R&ER Magazine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The R&ER Magazine Number 217 June 2015 The Journal of the Ravenglass and Eskdale Railway Preservation Society Published quarterly by the Oh, My Aching Buttocks! The Ravenglass and Eskdale Railway Editorial by John Taylor Preservation Society Limited R&ER Member of the Heritage I have just visited Ratty and enjoyed two return trips on the railway, one with Railway Association diesel haulage, the other by steam. I also compose the Forty Years Ago articles Magazine for the Magazine, and you can find my latest offering on page 35. No 217 June 2015 I feel that I have an interesting viewpoint in that I have been steadily chronicling the Ratty story of “Forty Years Ago”, from 1960 to 1975, over the last fifteen years. Editorial Team: Keith Herbert, Di Chase, Opinions expressed by contributors and Bill Seddon, Mark Harrington, in editorial comment do not necessarily So what did I see and experience on 10th April 2015? Well first of all I enjoyed John Taylor reflect the collective views of the Society. a wonderfully sunny day with fine weather, and although hazy, I experienced again the amazing scenery on show from sea to mountain. I saw all the work Editorial Designer: Julie Hutchinson going on at Ravenglass – the new engineers’ workshop almost complete and Address for Magazine Correspondence: PRESS DEADLINE: Material for inclusion in looking impressive; and work beginning on the museum – surely something Keith Herbert the next issue of the Magazine must long needed and to look forward to. 7 Dalegarth Cottages reach the editors not later than Boot, Holmrook Thursday 16th July at noon. Secondly I experienced superb trips from both Douglas and then Irt; powerful Cumbria CA19 1TF Please send material earlier if possible. haulage up the gradients from the latest diesel locomotive, and the wonderfully [email protected] nostalgic sounds and smells and power from the oldest steam loco. So many The R&ER Magazine is always pleased to receive correspondence, photographs and articles for possible inclusion. changes in forty years! Most nowadays arrive via our e-mail address, but postal contributions are just as welcome. Please write your name and address on the back of any prints, and give at least the date and location of each Thirdly, I saw twenty-first century signalling at Ravenglass and along the line; photograph where possible. We have scanning facilities for slides and negatives, and will endeavour to return any loaned photographic material. safety features that belong to a modern railway and a timetable suited to the needs of visitors, both those that use the railway as a means to take them and Society website: http://www.rerps.co.uk bring them back from walks, as well as those just out to enjoy a return journey; Council Chairman: Sam Dixon, 15 Lyceum Close, Leighton, Crewe, Cheshire CW1 3YB. and track that appeared to give a smooth ride thanks to new rails, new plastic Email: [email protected] sleepers and new ballast. So many more changes in forty years! Hon. Secretary: Mungo Stacy, 34 Mayfield Road, Manchester M16 8EU. There is nothing better than riding on Ratty in the open air – it’s a totally brilliant Email: [email protected] sensory experience. So well done to the Railway Company for all the amazing Hon. Financial Secretary: Ian Leigh, 206B Crowfield House, North Row, Central Milton Keynes, improvements that make riding on Ratty such a wonderful experience; both Buckinghamshire MK9 3LQ. Email: [email protected] those that I have been enjoying relating to you in my articles, and those that Hon. Membership Secretary: Phil Taylor, 12 Wholehouse Road, Seascale, Cumbria CA20 1QY. have taken place in the last few years. Email: [email protected] (1-1299 and 2500-3999) But oh, the state of the coaching stock! And oh, my aching buttocks! This is Assistant Membership Secretary: Jim Wilcock, ‘Porthlow’, Neston Road, Ness, Neston CH64 4AZ. the one thing that I personally feel needs urgent attention. Why oh why in the Email: [email protected] (1300-2499) twenty-first century, forty or more years since they were first introduced, do we Sales Officer: Terry Williams, 88 Bluestone Road, Moston, Manchester M40 9HY. still have to endure cramped and uncomfortable conditions in the rolling stock? Email: [email protected] Passengers, tourists and visitors deserve more. There has been some superb Magazine Distributor: Cumbria Mailing Services Ltd. Penrith, CA11 9FQ. investment in infrastructure, buildings, stations, signalling, safety and trackwork. But could we not have some investment now in new coaching stock to reflect the Heywood House Bookings: Mary Harding. Email: [email protected]. Tel: 01229 717080. times we live in and make it even more of a pleasure to ride on the Ratty? What Volunteers: Peter Mills. Email: [email protected] about converting the Eskdale Belle into an observation coach with panoramic General Manager: Trevor Stockton, R&ER Co. Ltd. Ravenglass, Cumbria, CA18 1SW. Tel: 01229 717171. windows at one end; or new covered coaches with curved roof windows (like the Swiss Glacier Express) to let passengers see more of the scenery and feel less Front Cover: River Mite storms to the top of Mill Wood, May 2014. cramped? How could we make the concept of open coaches more comfortable? Photo: David Mart 2 3 Meanwhile in our latest edition you will find not only further comment on the bring to an end the first phase of the museum redevelopment and that the carriages (have a look through the mailbag on page 30), but also the usual news, second phase will take place, hopefully this next winter, with the all-important views and historical features, as well as a glimpse into the world of the volunteer train shed. This will give a home to Synolda, Katie, Quarryman and assorted Stationmaster, as described by Gwyn Murfet, a familiar and very smartly turned rolling stock, as the story is told of the operational development of the railway. out sight at Irton Road. Perhaps readers will be encouraged to give it a go! If you are reading this and you wish to be involved in the restoration of these, and other items of stock, please do not hesitate to get in touch with the railway. All this building work has played havoc with our car park surface at Ravenglass. News from Ravenglass Not only our works, but also those of Network Rail contractors, with the main Trevor Stockton line bridge renewal, have contributed to the additional wear and tear, so we are hoping to carry out a resurfacing programme in three stages – two this late It looks at long last like some light at the end of our metaphorical railway spring and the last one next year when the museum is finished. tunnel. The start of the 2015 daily service saw three R&ER steam locomotives Work has now started on the new guards’ room, situated across from the old available [at the beginning of a season] for the first time since 2012. The new one in the area to the back of the joiner’s shop. Many moons ago this area was workshop now nears completion. With machinery inside and Perkins standing the Chief Engineer’s office, when the building was the engineering workshop. on the centre road, it looks like we are starting to mean business. We are much Once this has been finished we will eventually reclaim the old [current] guards’ more capable of dealing with breakdowns and repairs than we have been for room for either an archive office or another bedroom for the bungalow. It is the last two seasons. All credit to Steve, Graeme, Geoff, Nigel, David and John worth noting for historians that this room used to be the General Manager’s (apologies if I have missed anyone) for all of the additional work that has gone office until 1980. We are very good at recycling! into the internal preparation and external paint work – and all at the same time as keeping the railway running. On the marketing front, group bookings continue to grow and the hiring of the Eskdale Belle for “significant anniversaries” is very popular. By far the most The daily service started quietly but built to Easter, which was encouraging, popular of all is the ‘buy a gift’ cream tea – we sold in excess of 450 of these despite the weather being rather indifferent over the Bank Holiday weekend last season. To further enhance the experience we are now looking at bespoke itself. Additional trains were run for much of the period, taking the opportunity pottery! to give a little more in the way of steam-hauled journeys, a welcome change from the recent past where diesels have prevailed to keep the advertised service Welcome to Will Sands, who is joining the operational team, and welcome back going. to Peter Mills, now fully recovered from a wintertime arm injury. Continuing the theme, The railway still needs lots of volunteer help on a daily basis; please contact from the last Magazine, Martin Cookman, Peter Mills or me at the railway if you are interested. of the situation with the old museum: it has now been stripped Permanent Way Notes out, revealing the David Moseley shell of the old British Railways waiting It is probably no exaggeration to say this winter has seen the track gang complete room, graffiti and all! some of the most complex and varied track alterations and renewals the railway Once the building has has ever seen. received some much needed restoration Fresh from completing the renewal and realigning of Fisherground in November, it will be completely work on the track recommenced in early January with the replacement of the altered internally, with crossover and points outside Ravenglass signal box, along with associated new, modern displays ‘plain’ track renewal into platforms 1, 2 and 3.
Recommended publications
  • Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront

    Transportation on the Minneapolis Riverfront

    RAPIDS, REINS, RAILS: TRANSPORTATION ON THE MINNEAPOLIS RIVERFRONT Mississippi River near Stone Arch Bridge, July 1, 1925 Minnesota Historical Society Collections Prepared by Prepared for The Saint Anthony Falls Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D. Heritage Board Principal Investigator Minnesota Historical Society Penny A. Petersen 704 South Second Street Researcher Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Hess, Roise and Company 100 North First Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 May 2009 612-338-1987 Table of Contents PROJECT BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................. 1 RAPID, REINS, RAILS: A SUMMARY OF RIVERFRONT TRANSPORTATION ......................................... 3 THE RAPIDS: WATER TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS .............................................. 8 THE REINS: ANIMAL-POWERED TRANSPORTATION BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ............................ 25 THE RAILS: RAILROADS BY SAINT ANTHONY FALLS ..................................................................... 42 The Early Period of Railroads—1850 to 1880 ......................................................................... 42 The First Railroad: the Saint Paul and Pacific ...................................................................... 44 Minnesota Central, later the Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul Railroad (CM and StP), also called The Milwaukee Road .......................................................................................... 55 Minneapolis and Saint Louis Railway .................................................................................
  • Rail Deck Park Engineering and Costing Study

    Rail Deck Park Engineering and Costing Study

    Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 1.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Alignment with Other Initiatives ................................................................................. 8 1.3 Project Team ............................................................................................................. 9 City of Toronto.................................................................................................. 9 Build Toronto.................................................................................................... 9 WSP Canada Group Limited............................................................................ 9 2.0 STUDY METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................. 10 2.1 Study Area............................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Data Gathering ........................................................................................................ 10 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS............................................................................................... 12 3.1 Topography & Landforms.......................................................................................
  • DART+ South West Technical Optioneering Report Park West to Heuston Station Area Around Heuston Station and Yard Iarnród Éireann

    DART+ South West Technical Optioneering Report Park West to Heuston Station Area Around Heuston Station and Yard Iarnród Éireann

    DART+ South West Technical Optioneering Report Park West to Heuston Station Area around Heuston Station and Yard Iarnród Éireann Contents Chapter Page Glossary of Terms 5 1. Introduction 8 1.1. Purpose of the Report 8 1.2. DART+ Programme Overview 9 1.3. DART+ South West Project 10 1.4. Capacity Increases Associated with DART+ South West 10 1.5. Key infrastructure elements of DART+ South West Project 11 1.6. Route Description 11 2. Existing Situation 14 2.1. Overview 14 2.2. Challenges 14 2.3. Structures 15 2.4. Permanent Way and Tracks 17 2.5. Other Railway Facilities 19 2.6. Ground Conditions 19 2.7. Environment 20 2.8. Utilities 20 3. Requirements 22 3.1. Specific requirements 22 3.2. Systems Infrastructure and Integration 22 3.3. Design Standards 25 4. Constraints 26 4.1. Environment 26 4.2. Permanent Way 27 4.3. Existing Structures 27 4.4. Geotechnical 27 4.5. Existing Utilities 28 5. Options 29 5.1. Options summary 29 5.2. Options Description 29 5.3. OHLE Arrangement 29 5.4. Permanent Way 30 5.5. Geotechnical 31 5.6. Roads 31 5.7. Cable and Containments 31 5.8. Structures 31 5.9. Drainage 31 6. Options Selection Process 32 6.1. Options Selection Process 32 6.2. Stage 1 Preliminary Assessment (Sifting) 32 6.3. Preliminary Assessment (Sifting) 32 6.4. Stage 2: MCA Process – Emerging Preferred Option 33 DP-04-23-ENG-DM-TTA-30361 Page 2 of 40 Appendix A - Sifting process backup 35 Appendix B – Supporting Drawings 36 Tables Table 1-1 Route Breakdown 11 Table 2-1 Existing Retaining Walls 17 Table 5-1 Options Summary 29 Table 6-1 Sifting
  • 2015 Feasibility Report (PDF)

    2015 Feasibility Report (PDF)

    Feasibility Report on Proposed Amtrak Service Chicago-Milwaukee-LaCrosse-Twin Cities-(St. Cloud) M.W. Franke Senior Director State Government Contracts W.L. Lander Principal Officer – Corridor Planning B.E. Hillblom Senior Director – State Partnerships R. J. Rogers Business Planning and Analysis Manager Amtrak Chicago, Illinois May 6, 2015 Chicago-Milwaukee-Twin Cities-(St. Cloud) - Table of Contents - Page I. Introduction and Background 3 II. Study Purpose and Nature of Feasibility Study 3 III. Corridor Characteristics 4 III.A. Route Overview 4 III.B. Demographics and Transportation Alternatives 11 III.C. Route Inspection 12 IV. Station Facilities 13 V. Crew Labor 13 VI. Schedules 14 VII. Ridership/Revenue Forecast 17 VIII. Rolling Stock and Maintenance 17 IX. Operating Expense/Subsidy Requirement 19 X. Proposed Capital Infrastructure Improvements 19 XI. Mobilization Costs (one-time expense) 23 XII. Summary Table of Key Numbers 24 Tables Table 1 – Track Ownership Table 2 – MSA and Populations Table 3 – Schedules Table 4 -- Locomotive & Equipment Acquisition Table 5 – Financial Summary by Scenario Table 6 – Infrastructure Capital Projects Exhibits Exhibit 1 – Amtrak Task Schedule for Feasibility Studies Exhibit 2 – Stations and Routes Exhibit 3 – Corridor Photographs - Set 1 Exhibit 3 – Corridor Photographs - Set 2 2 I. Introduction and Background This report was prepared by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) in response to a study request from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) in May 2012. The study’s purpose was to determine the feasibility of adding a “Second Frequency” intercity passenger train service between Chicago Union Station (CUS) and the Minnesota Twin Cities Area, including St.
  • Train Station Models Building Guide 2018

    Train Station Models Building Guide 2018

    Building Guide for Season’s Greenings: All Aboard! 1 Index of buildings and dioramas Biltmore Depot North Carolina Page 3 Metro-North Cannondale Station Connecticut Page 4 Central Railroad of New Jersey Terminal New Jersey Page 5 Chattanooga Train Shed Tennessee Page 6 Cincinnati Union Terminal Ohio Page 7 Citrus Groves Florida Page 8 Dino Depot -- Page 9 East Glacier Park Station Montana Page 10 Ellicott City Station Maryland Page 11 Gettysburg Lincoln Railroad Station Pennsylvania Page 12 Grain Elevator Minnesota Page 13 Grain Fields Kansas Page 14 Grand Canyon Depot Arizona Page 15 Grand Central Terminal New York Page 16 Kirkwood Missouri Pacific Depot Missouri Page 17 Lahaina Station Hawaii Page 18 Los Angeles Union Station California Page 19 Michigan Central Station Michigan Page 20 North Bennington Depot Vermont Page 21 North Pole Village -- Page 22 Peanut Farms Alabama Page 23 Pennsylvania Station (interior) New York Page 24 Pikes Peak Cog Railway Colorado Page 25 Point of Rocks Station Maryland Page 26 Salt Lake City Union Pacific Depot Utah Page 27 Santa Fe Depot California Page 28 Santa Fe Depot Oklahoma Page 29 Union Station Washington Page 30 Union Station D.C. Page 31 Viaduct Hotel Maryland Page 32 Vicksburg Railroad Barge Mississippi Page 33 2 Biltmore Depot Asheville, North Carolina built 1896 Building Materials Roof: pine bark Facade: bark Door: birch bark, willow, saltcedar Windows: willow, saltcedar Corbels: hollowed log Porch tread: cedar Trim: ash bark, willow, eucalyptus, woody pear fruit, bamboo, reed, hickory nut Lettering: grapevine Chimneys: jequitiba fruit, Kielmeyera fruit, Schima fruit, acorn cap credit: Village Wayside Bar & Grille Wayside Village credit: Designed by Richard Morris Hunt, one of the premier architects in American history, the Biltmore Depot was commissioned by George Washington Vanderbilt III.
  • MTA Board Update: 2021 Commitment & Completion Goals

    MTA Board Update: 2021 Commitment & Completion Goals

    Photo: Robot Drill in the Rutgers Tunnel MTA Board Update: 2021 Commitment & Completion Goals February 18, 2021 MTA Capital Program Funding Federal Formula & Flexible Grants 14% 2020-24 Capital Program Funding Sources B&T Program Total Program: $54.8b Funding 6% Other Funded Funding Sources Sources 20% 80% As we ended 2020, Federal Funding was a primary source through which capital work was advanced due to the COVID-19 related impacts on the MTA budget and revenue sources. 2 Numbers have been rounded MTA Capital Program Funding Federal Formula & Flexible Grants 14% 2020-24 Capital Program Funding Sources B&T Program Total Program: $54.8b Funding 6% Other Funded Funding Sources Sources NY State Funding 26% 74% 6% 3 Numbers have been rounded MTA Capital Program Funding Federal Formula & Flexible Grants 14% 2020-24 Capital Program Funding Sources B&T Program Total Program: $54.8b Funding 6% Other Funded Funding Sources Sources NY State Funding 32% 68% 6% NY City Funding 6% 4 Numbers have been rounded MTA Capital Program Funding Federal Formula & Flexible Grants 14% 2020-24 Capital Program Funding Sources B&T Program Total Program: $54.8b Funding 6% Other Funded Funding Sources Sources NY State Funding 50% 50% 6% NY City Funding 6% Capital from New Revenue Sources 18% 5 Numbers have been rounded MTA Capital Program Funding Federal Formula & Flexible Grants 14% 2020-24 Capital Program Funding Sources B&T Program Total Program: $54.8b Funding 6% Other Funded Funding Sources Sources NY State Funding 55% 45% 6% NY City Funding 6% Capital from
  • Railroad Building in Virginia (1827 to 1860)

    Railroad Building in Virginia (1827 to 1860)

    Railroad Building in Virginia (1827 to 1860) Virginia History Series #10-08 © 2008 Major Railroads in Virginia (from 1827-1860) • Baltimore and Ohio (1827) – Winchester & Potomac (at Harpers Ferry) – Winchester & Strasburg • South Side or “Petersburg & -- North Western to Lynchburg RR” (1849-54) Parkersburg, WV • Richmond & Danville (1847-1856) • Manassas Gap (1850-54) • Petersburg & Roanoke (river in NC) • Orange & Alexandria (1848) (1833) -- Richmond & Petersburg (1838) • Virginia Central (1836) -- Blue Ridge (1858) • Norfolk and Petersburg (1853) • Virginia & Tennessee (1850s) • Seaboard & Roanoke (river in NC) or “Portsmouth and Weldon RR” (1835) • Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac to Alexandria (1834) & Fredericksburg & Charlottesville RR Major RR Routes in Virginia by 1860 Wheeling●, Ohio River Parkersburg ● ● Grafton Maryland & York RR+ + ++++++/ + Norfolk Stn + Petersburg & + Norfolk RR + + + + Suffolk Stn + + Bristol ● + + + + Norfolk & + Roanoke RR Weldon ■ On March 8, 1827, the Commonwealth of Virginia joined Maryland in giving the Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road (B&O RR) the task of building a railroad from the port of Baltimore, MD West to a suitable point on the Ohio River. The railroad was intended to provide a faster route for Midwestern goods to reach the East Coast than the successful Erie Canal across upstate NY. Construction began on July 4th, 1828. It was decided to follow the Patapsco River to a point near where the railroad would cross the “fall line” and descend into the valley of the Monocacy and Potomac Rivers. Thomas Viaduct (on the B&O RR) spans the Patapsco River and Patapsco Valley between Relay and Elkridge, MD (1833-35) It was the largest bridge in the nation and today its still the world's oldest multiple arched stone railroad bridge Further extensions of the B&O RR soon opened to Frederick and Point of Rocks on the Potomac river.
  • MX-ELEC STR-SPEC-2017-Rev3.0

    MX-ELEC STR-SPEC-2017-Rev3.0

    Capital Projects Group Performance Specifications for Structures Passing Over Electrified Corridors MX-ELEC STR-SPEC-2017-Rev3.0 May 12th 2017 Contents Chapter 1 ‐ General ............................................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Design Criteria Overview ..............................................................................................................................4 1.2 Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................4 1.3 Basis of Design .............................................................................................................................................7 1.4 Regulations, Codes, Standards and Guidelines (Latest Version) ..................................................................7 1.5 General Design Parameters .........................................................................................................................8 1.6 Design Life ....................................................................................................................................................8 1.7 Standardization ............................................................................................................................................8 1.8 Durability ......................................................................................................................................................8
  • Network Rail a Guide to Overhead Electrification 132787-ALB-GUN-EOH-000001 February 2015 Rev 10

    Network Rail a Guide to Overhead Electrification 132787-ALB-GUN-EOH-000001 February 2015 Rev 10

    Network Rail A Guide to Overhead Electrification 132787-ALB-GUN-EOH-000001 February 2015 Rev 10 Alan Baxter Network Rail A Guide to Overhead Electrification 132787-ALB-GUN-EOH-000001 February 2015 Rev 10 Contents 1.0 Introduction ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 2.0 Definitions �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������2 3.0 Why electrify? �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������4 4.0 A brief history of rail electrification in the UK �����������������������������������������������������5 5.0 The principles of electrically powered trains ������������������������������������������������������6 6.0 Overhead lines vs. third rail systems ����������������������������������������������������������������������7 7.0 Power supply to power use: the four stages of powering trains by OLE 8 8.0 The OLE system ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������10 9.0 The components of OLE equipment ��������������������������������������������������������������������12 10.0 How OLE equipment is arranged along the track ������������������������������������������17 11.0 Loading gauges and bridge clearances ��������������������������������������������������������������24 12.0 The safety of passengers and staff ������������������������������������������������������������������������28
  • Issue #30, March 2021

    Issue #30, March 2021

    High-Speed Intercity Passenger SPEEDLINESMarch 2021 ISSUE #30 Moynihan is a spectacular APTA’S CONFERENCE SCHEDULE » p. 8 train hall for Amtrak, providing additional access to Long Island Railroad platforms. Occupying the GLOBAL RAIL PROJECTS » p. 12 entirety of the superblock between Eighth and Ninth Avenues and 31st » p. 26 and 33rd Streets. FRICTIONLESS, HIGH-SPEED TRANSPORTATION » p. 5 APTA’S PHASE 2 ROI STUDY » p. 39 CONTENTS 2 SPEEDLINES MAGAZINE 3 CHAIRMAN’S LETTER On the front cover: Greetings from our Chair, Joe Giulietti INVESTING IN ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY AND ENERGY-EFFICIENT HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS WILL CREATE HIGHLY SKILLED JOBS IN THE TRANS- PORTATION INDUSTRY, REVITALIZE DOMESTIC 4 APTA’S CONFERENCE INDUSTRIES SUPPLYING TRANSPORTATION PROD- UCTS AND SERVICES, REDUCE THE NATION’S DEPEN- DENCY ON FOREIGN OIL, MITIGATE CONGESTION, FEATURE ARTICLE: AND PROVIDE TRAVEL CHOICES. 5 MOYNIHAN TRAIN HALL 8 2021 CONFERENCE SCHEDULE 9 SHARED USE - IS IT THE ANSWER? 12 GLOBAL RAIL PROJECTS 24 SNIPPETS - IN THE NEWS... ABOVE: For decades, Penn Station has been the visible symbol of official disdain for public transit and 26 FRICTIONLESS HIGH-SPEED TRANS intercity rail travel, and the people who depend on them. The blight that is Penn Station, the new Moynihan Train Hall helps knit together Midtown South with the 31 THAILAND’S FIRST PHASE OF HSR business district expanding out from Hudson Yards. 32 AMTRAK’S BIKE PROGRAM CHAIR: JOE GIULIETTI VICE CHAIR: CHRIS BRADY SECRETARY: MELANIE K. JOHNSON OFFICER AT LARGE: MICHAEL MCLAUGHLIN 33
  • Network Rail Infrastructure Limited – Annual Return 2011 3 MB

    Network Rail Infrastructure Limited – Annual Return 2011 3 MB

    Network Rail Annual Return 2011 “More trains would take the pressure off at busy times. They nearly all seem to be crowded.” The railways have never been more popular. The result is that we need more capacity. More trains. Longer trains. We spent £1.7bn in the year on capacity enhancements and plan to invest £12bn over the five years to 2014 *Passenger comment, December 2010 Helping Britain run better Contents 1 Executive Summary 8 Introduction 11 Section 1 – Operational performance and stakeholder relationships 25 Section 2 – Network capability and network availability 37 Section 3 – Asset management 75 Section 4 – Activity volumes 89 Section 5 – Safety and environment 98 Section 6 – Enhancement Programme “Projects designed to increase capacity and improve services range from the new Airdrie-Bathgate rail link in Scotland to Thameslink across London, from platform lengthening on the East Coast to the redevelopment of Reading and entirely new stations such as Newport.” Contents Executive Summary 1 Track failures 50 Overall performance in 2010/11 1 Condition of asset temporary speed restriction sites (M4) 51 Operational performance and stakeholder relationships 2 Track geometry faults (M5) 54 Network capability and network availability 3 Earthwork failures (M6) 57 Asset management 4 Earthwork condition (M33) 58 Safety and environment 5 Tunnel condition 59 Expenditure and efficiency 6 Bridge condition (M8) 61 Enhancements schemes 7 Signalling failures (M9) 64 Signalling asset condition (M10) 64 Introduction 8 Alternating current traction
  • Riviera Line Manual

    Riviera Line Manual

    The Riviera Line © Copyright RailSimulator.com 2012, all rights reserved Release Version 1.0 Train Simulator – The Riviera Line 1 ROUTE INFORMATION .............................................................................3 1.1 History................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Exeter St. Davids Station.......................................................................... 4 1.3 Paignton Station...................................................................................... 5 2 ROLLING STOCK......................................................................................6 2.1 Class 143 Diesel Multiple Unit ................................................................... 6 2.2 Design & Specification.............................................................................. 6 2.3 Class 143 DMSL FGW ............................................................................... 7 2.4 Class 143 DMS FGW................................................................................. 7 3 DRIVING THE CLASS 143.........................................................................8 3.1 Cab Controls........................................................................................... 8 4 SCENARIOS.............................................................................................9 4.1 [143] 1. First Look................................................................................... 9 4.2 [143] 2. Preparations..............................................................................