AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.14 1St QUARTER 2007 (January to March)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.14 1St QUARTER 2007 (January to March) While Bulgaria and Romania joined European Union on the 1st of January 2007 this Antonov An-12, captured here in former Balkan Airlines colours, has seen a sunset for its freight operations within EU along with a fleet of some 20 An-12s in service by Bulgarian operators. AIR TRANSPORT: QUARTERLY REPORT NO.14 1st QUARTER 2007 (January to March) 1 OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................................2 2. HIGHLIGHTS AND KEY DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................3 2.1 REGULATORY.........................................................................................................................3 2.2 AIRLINES................................................................................................................................4 2.3 AIRPORTS...............................................................................................................................9 2.4 SAFETY AND SECURITY ........................................................................................................12 2.5 ATM....................................................................................................................................13 2.6 MANUFACTURERS ................................................................................................................13 2.7 THE ENVIRONMENT ..............................................................................................................14 3. BULGARIA AND ROMANIA, THE LATEST ACCESSION STATES ...............................15 3.1 REGULATORY ISSUES ...........................................................................................................16 3.2 AIR TRANSPORT NETWORKS .................................................................................................17 3.3 AIRLINES..............................................................................................................................18 3.4 AIRPORTS AND AIRSPACE .....................................................................................................21 3.5 DEVELOPMENTS SINCE JANUARY 2007 ................................................................................23 Cranfield University: Quarterly Report Q1 2007 for DG TREN 1 1 Overview The year began with two important developments: the adoption of the first stage agreement on the EU-US bilateral, and the widening of EU borders to include Bulgaria and Romania. After four years of negotiations, the first stage of the EU–US bilateral agreement has now been reached, becoming effective in March 2008. The deal permits any EU or US airline holding an appropriate operator’s licence to provide services between any city in the EU and any city in the US. Unlimited third, fourth and fifth freedom rights feature and the US has accepted the Community air carrier concept. There is some expectation that the new bilateral will be the catalyst triggering long awaited consolidation in the airline industry. Any potential disadvantages for EU carriers can be addressed in the second stage of negotiations scheduled for 2008. The arrival of the two latest accession states increased EU land area by 350,000 square kilometres and added some thirty million to its population. Although Bulgaria has experienced some problems in integrating its air services with the internal aviation market, both new member states have recorded impressive air traffic growth in the first few months of membership. Bulgaria is 83% up on year-to-year traffic figures in the UK market alone, while Romania is slightly ahead in the same market. Low-cost carriers have been at the forefront of network expansion to the new states. In the wider world, AEA airlines reported passenger traffic up 5% in the three months ending February 2007: intra-European cross-border passenger numbers were up 7%. Air freight was not a buoyant market, with freight tonne-kilometres down slightly. The European air transport network was reinforced by LCC activities. Led by Ryanair, these airlines started ninety-four new routes in Q1 2007, generating 470 weekly return flights. One LCC failure was recorded, with Sweden’s FlyMe sinking into bankruptcy. There was a measure of consolidation within the market, where Thomas Cook agreed merger terms with MyTravel and Air Berlin took over LTU. Elsewhere in airline-related news, Iberia was forced onto the market as an investment group prepared to make an offer to buy the company. Flybe became Europe’s largest regional carrier with the acquisition of British Airways subsidiary, BA Connect. In parallel with traffic growth, safety in air transport continues to improve. IATA reported European airline hull losses in 2006 at 0.32 losses per one million flights, just half the global accident rate, down 14% from 2005 statistics. Airport traffic reflected increased airline activity. ACI’s European airports posted a 6% increase for passengers in the first two months of 2007, above the worldwide growth at the organization’s airports (held back by relatively low growth at US airports). Traffic growth at major airports may be at the cost of on-time performance: AEA reports member airlines’ departures were delayed more often at Europe’s largest airports. The worst performer was Madrid where the average delay in 2006 was forty-six minutes, and 31% of departures suffered delay of over fifteen minutes. Among Europe’s largest airports, Dublin, Madrid and Milan Malpensa recorded gains in passenger traffic over 12%, but London Heathrow and Manchester suffered drops of around 2% over the two months. This fall at two of the UK’s airports could reflect the impact of threatened strike action by British Airways cabin-crew in January. Cranfield University: Quarterly Report Q1 2007 for DG TREN 2 2. Highlights and key developments 2.1 Regulatory The most significant development in this quarter was the draft aviation agreement on the EU-US bilateral reached on 2nd March following lengthy negotiations over the past four years. The tentative agreement reached in November 2005 was subject to a reform in the US's rules on airline ownership and control. Following the withdrawal of the planned US reform, a number of additional elements have been added to the earlier agreement to provide a better balance of interests. These include: an additional protocol on ownership, investment and control; the unilateral granting to the EU by the US of seventh-freedom passenger traffic rights to a number of non-EU countries; a number of access rights for Community carriers to the US Fly America programme; rights in respect of franchising and branding; and provisions on antitrust immunity. This first stage agreement was approved by the Council of Transport Ministers on 22nd March and will become effective on 30th March 2008. Negotiations on a second stage agreement will focus on: the further liberalisation of traffic rights; additional foreign investment opportunities; the effects of environmental measures and infrastructure constraints; further access to Government-funded air transport; and wet- leasing. If no stage 2 agreement has been reached within twelve months of the start of the review, any Member State may notify the Commission which traffic rights in relation to its own territory it wishes to suspend. In addition on 22nd March, the Council reached political agreement on a proposal for a Decision on the signature and provisional application of an agreement with Russia on Siberian overflights payments. The EU signed “horizontal” aviation agreements with Paraguay in February and with Malaysia in March removing nationality restrictions in the bilateral air services agreements between Member States and the two countries. Paraguay is the third Latin American country to have signed this type of agreement with the EU. On 7th March the Commission announced that it had found the restructuring plan for Cyprus Airways proposed by the Republic of Cyprus to be compatible with Community Law. On 24th January the Commission adopted a package of regulatory measures for airports consisting of three key initiatives: a proposal for a Directive on airport charges; a communication on airport capacity, efficiency and safety in Europe; and a report on the implementation of the ground handling Directive. The proposal on airport charges aims to redefine the relationship between airport operators and airport users by requiring complete transparency, consultation with users, and non- discrimination in the calculation of user charges. Each Member State will be required to establish a national independent regulatory authority to arbitrate and settle disputes in respect of these matters. The aim of the new measures is to create a common set of rules for airports that can be applied and uniformly enforced throughout Europe. In March the Commission produced its third update of the Community list of airlines banned from operating in the EU. Two carriers (Phuket Air and DAS Air Cargo) have been removed from the revised list after having rectified their previous serious safety deficiencies. A total of 49 airlines previously included in the list have been removed as a result of their ceasing to operate. New safety measures have been Cranfield University: Quarterly Report Q1 2007 for DG TREN 3 imposed on two carriers, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) and Air West of Sudan. PIA is subject to an operational restriction that only permits the carrier to operate its Boeing 777 aircraft within the EU. In January
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives Annual Report 2011 Introduction Company Profile and Strategy Service Portfolio Communication and Social Responsibility
    Annual Report 2011 Report Annual Perspectives Annual Report 2011 Introduction Company profile and strategy Service portfolio Communication and social responsibility Perspectives. We are an airport operator. We run a major piece of aviation infrastructure – part of an international, interconnected transport network that sustains global mobility and unites people across national boundaries. We are also a responsible corporate citizen who seeks an open, fair and balanced dialogue with stake - holders and interest groups and for whom the long-term protec- tion of the environment, climate and natural resources is para- mount. As such, we pursue a forward-looking business strategy intended to strike a successful balance between business, envi- ronmental and social objectives. We provide our dedicated work- force with the training and continuing education they need to be their best; we offer attractive, long-term employment; and we deliver valuable economic and labor-market stimulus with a reach far beyond the bounds of our airport. Our goal: to create value – for our customers, employees, owners and host region. Workforce and work environment Environmental and climate protection Financial review Sustainable development Motivation Munich Airport is a key hub for domestic German and international air traffic. Our de- sire as the airport’s operating company is to unite the world’s people, markets and con- tinents. People – our passengers, business partners, employees and neighbors – are the main motivating force behind everything we do. They drive and inspire us to be our best. Economy Environment Social equity Introduction Company profile and strategy Service portfolio Communication and social responsibility Perspectives 2011 Motivation Markets Message Economy Our goal is to sharpen our cus- tomer focus and enhance the appeal of the products and services we offer air travelers and visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives Annual Report 2012 Perspectives
    Perspectives Annual Report 2012 Perspectives We are an airport operator. We run a major piece of aviation infrastructure – part of an international, interconnected transport network that sustains global mobility and unites people across national boundaries. We are also a responsible corporate citizen who seeks an open, fair and balanced dialogue with stake holders and inter- est groups and for whom the long-term protection of the environment, climate and natural resources is paramount. As such, we pursue a forward-looking business strategy intended to strike a successful balance between business, environmental and social objectives. We provide our dedicated workforce with the training and continuing education they need to be their best; we offer attractive, long-term employment; and we deliver valuable economic and labor-market stimulus with a reach far beyond the bounds of our airport. Our goal: to create value – for our customers, employees, owners and host region. Markets As a hub, Munich Airport plays an important role for German and international aviation. We meet the needs of our varied customers with a comprehen- sive range of services and products. In the avia- tion segment, we handle the air traffic – including passenger services and all air-side and land-side services concerning aircraft handling. With Retail and Hospitality, as well as the Consumer Activities and Real Estate divisions, we also provide a broad portfolio of products and services in the non-avia- tion segment. Both markets make an almost bal- anced contribution to our consolidated revenue. Our corporate policy is systematically aligned toward sustainability. The quality and variety of our ser vices make us one of the most attractive airports in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Leaders in Innovative Full Service Airline Training
    Global Leaders in Innovative Full Service Airline Training committed to excellence Welcome At CTC we are proud of the reputation that we have built over time as worldwide providers of innovative training solutions. This reputation is founded on the delivery of our core values: expertise, quality, innovation and flexibility. With our state-of-the-art Crew Training Centres across the globe and specialist training personnel, we are able to provide our client airlines with every element of airline crew training. We offer a wide range of training options from basic CPL/IR licence through to Type Rating on the most popular commercial aircraft today including Boeing and Airbus, and onwards to training airline instructors and examiners. From crew selection through to crew supply and from CRM courses to Command Training, CTC can deliver all your needs; we are truly a ‘full service’ airline training specialist. To do this we enjoy comprehensive Joint Aviation Authority approvals as a Type-Rating Training Organisation and Flight Training Organisation and we have received approvals from many other regulatory authorities around the world. Equally as important, we enjoy the trust and loyalty of many of the world’s leading airlines – whether it be for the supply of a standalone training course, or for the outsourcing of all of their crew training needs. These factors make CTC your first choice partner to provide specialist aviation training and support – worldwide – for all your aircrew requirements. We look forward to being of service to you. Captain Chris Clarke Group Chairman CTC Aviation Group plc 1 WELCOME ‘CTC has supported us throughout our growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007
    EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 1 Analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 EUROPEAN COMMISSION EU_ENTWURF_08:00_ENTWURF_01 01.04.2026 13:07 Uhr Seite 2 Air Transport and Airport Research Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 German Aerospace Center Deutsches Zentrum German Aerospace für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Center in the Helmholtz-Association Air Transport and Airport Research December 2008 Linder Hoehe 51147 Cologne Germany Head: Prof. Dr. Johannes Reichmuth Authors: Erik Grunewald, Amir Ayazkhani, Dr. Peter Berster, Gregor Bischoff, Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer, Dr. Marc Gelhausen, Wolfgang Grimme, Michael Hepting, Hermann Keimel, Petra Kokus, Dr. Peter Meincke, Holger Pabst, Dr. Janina Scheelhaase web: http://www.dlr.de/fw Annual Report 2007 2008-12-02 Release: 2.2 Page 1 Annual analyses of the European air transport market Annual Report 2007 Document Control Information Responsible project manager: DG Energy and Transport Project task: Annual analyses of the European air transport market 2007 EC contract number: TREN/05/MD/S07.74176 Release: 2.2 Save date: 2008-12-02 Total pages: 222 Change Log Release Date Changed Pages or Chapters Comments 1.2 2008-06-20 Final Report 2.0 2008-10-10 chapters 1,2,3 Final Report - full year 2007 draft 2.1 2008-11-20 chapters 1,2,3,5 Final updated Report 2.2 2008-12-02 all Layout items Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate-General for Energy and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract TREN/05/MD/S07.74176.
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Leasing (ACMI) First Supreme Court Ruling on a Consequential Damages Waiver
    Wet leasing (ACMI) First supreme court ruling on a consequential damages waiver Ángel Carrasco Perera Professor of Civil Law, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha Academic counsel, Gómez-Acebo & Pombo This judgment is interesting because it resolves at least one doubt: the validity of the consequential damages waiver clause in commercial contracts. 1. The wet lease agreement and the Barajas accident Iberworld Airlines filed a claim against Mapfre, seeking a determination of liability of Aena and Air Comet and, consequently, of Mapfre, as insurer of both, for the purposes of receiving compensation for damage sustained by the Airbus A330 MSN 0670 aircraft on 28 May 2008 at Barajas airport. The aforementioned airlines had entered into a wet lease agreement under which Iberworld Airlines would provide a duly equipped aircraft to carry out the commercial passenger flights agreed thereunder. "Neither party shall be liable for loss of use or consequential damage arising out of the aforementioned or other services under this Agreement". Disclaimer: This paper is provided for general information purposes only and nothing expressed herein should be construed as legal advice or recommendation. Analysis | March 2021 1 A collision occurred at Barajas airport in which the Airbus was damaged during a taxiing ma- noeuvre of the aforementioned aircraft from its parking space in the satellite building of Terminal 4 to Terminal 1 for a flight operated by Air Comet. According to the claim filed by Iberworld, an Aena Follow Me, which was guiding the convoy, did not respect a waiting point (stop) on the A-11 section of the road parallel to runway 33 and the airport's Surface Movement Control did not manage the movement correctly either; this caused the aircraft to brake abruptly to make way for a Vueling aircraft, which was travelling on the preferential runway.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-In Am Bahnhof Und Fly Rail Baggage
    1/8 Check-in am Bahnhof via Zürich und Genève Check-in à la gare via Zürich et Genève Check-in alla stazione via Zürich e Genève Check-in at the railstation via Zürich and Genève Version: 26. Januar 2011 Legend HA = Handlingagent SP = Swissport, DN = Dnata Switzerland AG, AS = Airline Assistance Switzerland AG, EH = Own Handling R = Reason T = Technical, S = Security, O = Other reason WT = Weight Tolerance Y = Economy-Class, C = Business-Class, F = First-Class * = Agent Informations Infoportal/Airlines Check-in ok Restrictions Airline, Code Check-in Einschränkungen/Restrictions WT HA R Y = 2 Adria Airways JP ok SP C = 3 Aegean Airlines A3 ok 2 SP Aer Lingus EI no SP O Aeroflot Russian Airlines SU no SP S Aerolineas Argentinas AR ok 2 SP African Safari Airways ASA ok 2 DN Afriqiyah Airways 8U no DN O Air Algérie* AH ok No boardingpass 0 SP Air Baltic BT no SP T Not for USA, Canada, Pristina, Russia, Air Berlin* AB ok Cyprus; 0 DN not possible for groups 11+ Air Cairo MSC ok 2 SP AC 6821 / 6822 / 6826 / 6829 / 6832 / Air Canada AC no SP T =ok Air Dolomiti EN ok 2 SP Air Europa AEA / UX ok 2 DN Not from Zürich; not for USA, Canada, AF ok* 2 SP T Air France* Mexico; no boardingpass Air India AI ok 2 SP Air Italy I9 ok 2 DN Air Mali XG no SP O Air Malta KM ok 3 SP Y = 7 Air Mauritius MK ok Not from Zurich SP C = 10 Air Mediteranée BIE ok 2 DN Air New Zealand NZ ok 2 SP Air One AP ok 2 SP Air Seychelles HM ok Not from Zurich 3 SP Air Transat TS ok 2 SP Alitalia AZ no SP/DN T American Airlines AA no SP T ANA All Nippon Airways NH ok 2 SP Armavia
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit
    Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit Birmingham, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, London City, Luton, Manchester, Newcastle, Stansted Full and Summary Analysis July 2006 Disclaimer The information contained in this report will be compiled from various sources and it will not be possible for the CAA to check and verify whether it is accurate and correct nor does the CAA undertake to do so. Consequently the CAA cannot accept any liability for any financial loss caused by the persons reliance on it. Contents Foreword Introductory Notes Full Analysis – By Reporting Airport Birmingham Edinburgh Gatwick Glasgow Heathrow London City Luton Manchester Newcastle Stansted Full Analysis With Arrival / Departure Split – By A Origin / Destination Airport B C – E F – H I – L M – N O – P Q – S T – U V – Z Summary Analysis FOREWORD 1 CONTENT 1.1 Punctuality Statistics: Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Luton, Stansted, Edinburgh, Newcastle and London City - Full and Summary Analysis is prepared by the Civil Aviation Authority with the co-operation of the airport operators and Airport Coordination Ltd. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. 2 ENQUIRIES 2.1 Statistics Enquiries concerning the information in this publication and distribution enquiries concerning orders and subscriptions should be addressed to: Civil Aviation Authority Room K4 G3 Aviation Data Unit CAA House 45/59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Tel. 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] 2.2 Enquiries concerning further analysis of punctuality or other UK civil aviation statistics should be addressed to: Tel: 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] Please note that we are unable to publish statistics or provide ad hoc data extracts at lower than monthly aggregate level.
    [Show full text]
  • IATA Agents in BSP Italy Date: 20 Maggio 2008 Subject: Carpatair
    BULLETIN 22/2008 For: All IATA Agents in BSP Italy Date: 20 Maggio 2008 Subject: Carpatair – ET Policy Egregi Agenti, Si prega voler prendere giusta nota che IATA non-è in alcun modo responsabile del contenuto della comunicazione. Per qualsiasi dubbio o chiarimento vi preghiamo voler contattare direttamente la Compagnia Aerea Distinti Saluti, Service Centre Europe International Air Transport Association Service Centre Europe Torre Europa Paseo de la Castellana, 95 28046 Madrid, Spain www.iata.org/europe/cs S.C. Carpatair S.A. TO: AGENTS IN IATA BSPs & INTERLINE PARTNERS ISSUED: 15 MAY 2008 CARPATAIR E-TICKETING POLICY STARTING 01 JUNE 2008 (IATA DEADLINE FOR PAPER TICKETS) Dear Partners, Carpatair (V3) would like to inform all travel agents and interline partners that effective 01 June 2008 V3 will have 100% electronic ticketing eligibility on its own routes for the issuance of V3 plated E-tickets (prefixed 021) across all of V3 sales channels. 1. V3 Electronic Ticket Issue Policy Carpatair may be selected as ticketing carrier by travel agents when issuing e-tickets to cover journeys entirely on V3 flights with V3 flight designator code including marketing flights. 2. V3 Interline Electronic Tickets Agreements (IETs) Carpatair has completed IET agreements with the following carriers. This means that providing Carpatair flights are part of an interline journey with the following carriers, Carpatair tickets may be issued in accordance with the V3 ticket issue policy. Note – list subject to change 2M Moldavian Airlines A3 Aegean Airlines AB Air Berlin AY Finnair HR Hahn Air LT LTU International LX Swiss International Air Lines MA Malev Hungarian Airlines OS Austrian Airlines RO Tarom SN SN Brussels 3.
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
    Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association.
    [Show full text]