Canton Junction Train Schedule to Boston
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT
CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth. -
2020 FMCB Annual Report
2020 FMCB Annual Report This report fulfills the requirements of Section 207 of Chapter 46 of the Acts of 2015 specifying that the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) report annually on, among other things, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s “own-source revenue, operating budget, capital plan and progress toward meeting performance metrics and targets.” This final report is presented to the Legislature after five and a half years of governance by the FMCB, with just under six months left in our extended term. 2020 was an extraordinary year, marked by an unprecedented global pandemic, nationwide protests, political and racial tensions, and substantial changes in the ways we live and work. Due to the widespread adoption of teleworking and the closure of hotels, restaurants, and other sectors to slow the spread of COVID-19, MBTA ridership fell sharply. By the end of October, Commuter Rail ridership was down 87% compared to 2019, with the system carrying only 8.5% of its pre- COVID morning peak ridership. Ferry ridership stood at 12% of pre-COVID ridership, with the MBTA paying to operate 112 trips daily with an average of seven riders per trip. Ridership at gated rapid transit (subway) stations was still roughly one-quarter of pre-COVID levels. Even bus ridership, which serves our most durable, transit-dependent customers, had fallen to about 45% of the baseline by October. This decline in ridership, of course, had significant implications for own source revenue. In November 2020, fare revenues were down 78% compared to November 2019. Parking and advertising revenues dropped in line with fares, while real estate revenues remained more stable. -
NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents
Northeast Corridor One-Year Implementation Plan Fiscal Year 2017 September 2016 Congress established the Northeast Corridor Commission to develop coordinated strategies for improving the Northeast’s core rail network in recognition of the inherent challenges of planning, financing, and implementing major infrastructure improvements that cross multiple jurisdictions. The expectation is that by coming together to take collective responsibility for the NEC, these disparate stakeholders will achieve a level of success that far exceeds the potential reach of any individual organization. The Commission is governed by a board comprised of one member from each of the NEC states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland) and the District of Columbia; four members from Amtrak; and five members from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The Commission also includes non-voting representatives from four freight railroads, states with connecting corridors and several commuter operators in the Region. 2| NEC One-Year Implementation Plan: FY17 Contents Introduction 6 Funding Summary 8 Baseline Capital Charge Program 10 1 - Boston South Station 12 16 - Shore to Girard 42 2 - Boston to Providence 14 17 - Girard to Philadelphia 30th Street 44 3 - Providence to Wickford Junction 16 18 - Philadelphia 30th Street - Arsenal 46 4 - Wickford Junction to New London 18 19 - Arsenal to Marcus Hook 48 5 - New London to New Haven 20 20 - Marcus Hook to Bacon 50 6 - New Haven to State Line 22 21 - Bacon to Perryville 52 7 - State Line to New Rochelle 24 22 - Perryville to WAS 54 8 - New Rochelle to Harold Interlocking 26 23 - Washington Union Terminal 56 9 - Harold Interlocking to F Interlocking 28 24 - WAS to CP Virginia 58 10 - F Interlocking to PSNY 30 25 - Springfield to New Haven 60 11 - Penn Terminal 32 27 - Spuyten Duyvil to PSNY* 62 12 - PSNY to Trenton 34 28 - 30th St. -
South County
Fairmount Line Corridor Improvements Project MBTA Contract No.G74PS01 Amendment 8 Service Enhancement Study Final Report April 2008 Prepared for: Prepared by: Fairmount Line Service Enhancement Study Introduction and Executive Summary...........................................................................................................2 Methodology.................................................................................................................................................8 1. Kick Off Meeting......................................................................................................................................9 2. Validate and Update Tools: Key Findings.............................................................................................10 2.1. South Station Capacity................................................................................................................10 2.2. Station Dwell Times with High Peak Period Travel Volumes....................................................15 2.3. Equipment Maintenance and Storage Capacity...........................................................................17 3. Develop and Screen Preliminary Options: Key Findings .......................................................................21 3.1. Baseline.......................................................................................................................................21 3.2. Peak Alternatives.........................................................................................................................22 -
Line Item Variance Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Date/Time: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Report ID: CMS-BM-003 Capital Management System Comparison of Bids Bid Date: 05/07/2020 Contract K78CN03 Engineer: 4249 Bidder: 5219 SCR Fall River Secondary Commuter Rail Expansion Firm Name: Vhb-Hntb, A Joint Venture Project Berkley to Fall River, Massachusetts Firm Name: Skanska DW White JV Engineer Bidder Variance Line Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price 0130.175 LAYOVER FACILITY LS 1 $18,090,531.00 $18,090,531.00 $20,000,000.00 $20,000,000.00 $1,909,469.00 $1,909,469.00 0130.429 TRAFFIC OFFICERS SERVICES AN 1 $4,100,000.00 $4,100,000.00 $4,100,000.00 $4,100,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 0211.495 SITE UTILITIES AN 1 $750,000.00 $750,000.00 $750,000.00 $750,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 0212.440 BRIDGE LS 1 $1,919,265.00 $1,919,265.00 $500,000.00 $500,000.00 ($1,419,265.00) ($1,419,265.00) 0213.211 PEST CONTROL AN 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 0221.331 DISPOSE OF QUALIFYING SOILS AN 1 $2,250,000.00 $2,250,000.00 $2,250,000.00 $2,250,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 0222.027 MATERIAL REMOVAL AN 1 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 0222.029 HANDLING AND TRANSPORT OF CY 5,000 $15.00 $75,000.00 $15.00 $75,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 EXCESS EXCAVATED SOIL GENERATED BY OTHERS 0222.108 ROCK EXCAVATION CY 100 $100.00 $10,000.00 $525.00 $52,500.00 $425.00 $42,500.00 Page 1 of 24 Date/Time: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Report ID: CMS-BM-003 Capital Management System Comparison of Bids Bid Date: 05/07/2020 -
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964. -
Regionwide Suburban Transit Opportunities Study Phase II
Regionwide Suburban Transit Opportunities Study Phase II A report produced by the Central Transportation Planning Staff for the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization Regionwide Suburban Transit Opportunities Study Phase II Project Manager Clinton Bench Authors Thomas J. Humphrey Heather Ostertog Contributing Staff Paul Reim Cartography Mary McShane Cover Design Jane M. Gillis Cover Photographs Carol Gautreau Bent Kenneth Dumas Central Transportation Planning Staff, directed by the Boston Region Metropolitan Planning Organization. The MPO is com- posed of state and regional agencies and authorities, and local governments. December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS.................................................................................................1 Overview...........................................................................................................................1 Suggested Routes .............................................................................................................2 Wellesley .........................................................................................................................2 Winchester.......................................................................................................................2 Westwood........................................................................................................................2 Canton..............................................................................................................................3 -
South Coast Rail Project Update NOV 2011
www.mass.gov/southcoastrail FEIS/FEIR Names Stoughton Route as the Preferred Alternative The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and MassDOT the Corps’ conclusion that there is no practicable released the Final Environmental Impact Statement/ alternative to the Stoughton Electric Alternative with Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/FEIR) on South less environmental impact. The FEIS/FEIR Preface Coast Rail for public review on September 23, 2013. The documents how MassDOT has complied with the FEIS/FEIR is a combined federal and state document requirements of the Certificate issued by the Secretary produced by the Corps summarizing the environmental of Environmental Affairs on the Draft Environmental review of the project. MassDOT adopted the federal Impact Report, and confirms MassDOT’s choice of the document – the FEIS – as the state Final Environmental Stoughton route as the preferred alternative. Impact Report – FEIR – with some additions. As part of the environmental review process, the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) office will accept public A Long Trip comments on the FEIS/FEIR until October 25, 2013. Before 1958, southeastern Massachusetts was As part of the public review, MassDOT is sponsoring served by commuter rail to New Bedford and Fall two public Open Houses to provide information on the River via the Old Colony Railroad System. Trains FEIR. See the box on page 4 for information on the civic left South Station and traveled via Canton Junction engagement and comment process. along the Stoughton Branch railroad. Once service As documented in the FEIS/FEIR, based on extensive was discontinued, commuter rail was only available analysis of environmental benefits and impacts, along the Boston-Providence Shore Line and the Old MassDOT has identified the Stoughton route as the Colony Middleborough Line, with no easy access for Commonwealth’s preferred alternative for the South commuters from Taunton, Fall River or New Bedford. -
Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 236/Thursday, December 10, 2009
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 236 / Thursday, December 10, 2009 / Notices 65589 themselves should write to the Director, extending 14.20 miles between milepost revoke will not automatically stay the Office of Information Programs and QNF 0.00 (at Myricks) and milepost transaction. Petitions for stay must be Services (address above). QNF 14.2 (at Fall River, filed no later than December 17, 1009 (at Massachusetts—Rhode Island state least 7 days before the exemption RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: line); (5) the Framingham to Worcester becomes effective). These records contain information segment of the Boston Main Line (the An original and 10 copies of all obtained primarily from the individual BML-West), extending approximately pleadings, referring to STB Finance who is the subject of these records. 22.92 miles between milepost QB 21.38 Docket No. 35312, must be filed with SYSTEMS EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS (at Framingham) and milepost QB 44.30 the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E OF THE PRIVACY ACT: (at Worcester); and (6) the track assets, Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423– None. but not the underlying real estate, 0001. In addition, a copy of each constituting the 9.71-mile rail line pleading must be served on Keith G. [FR Doc. E9–29451 Filed 12–9–09; 8:45 am] between milepost QB 1.12 (at CP Cove) O’Brien, Baker & Miller, PLLC, 2401 BILLING CODE 4710–24–P and milepost QB 10.83 (at Newton/ Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 300, Riverside) (the BML-East). These Washington, DC 20037. properties, which include Board decisions and notices are DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION approximately 71.28 miles of rail line, available on our Web site at: will be referred to collectively as ‘‘the http://www.stb.dot.gov. -
Old Colony Joint Transportation Committee (Jtc)
OLD COLONY JOINT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (JTC) Meeting Minutes of the Old Colony Joint Transportation Committee (JTC) Held Virtually Via Zoom due to the COVID-19 State of Emergency in Massachusetts April 1, 2021 at 12:00 P.M. ATTENDANCE Abington Bruce Hughes T & B Dan Murphy Avon Bill Fitzgerald BETA Group Greg Lucas Brockton Rob May VHB Rob Cahoon Easton David Field Mass Development Mary Ellen DeFrias Stoughton Joe Scardino GPI Sid Kashi Plymouth County Development Paula Fisher Whitman Noreen O’Toole Council BAT Michael Lambert OCPC Shawn Bailey BAT Glenn Geiler OCPC Bill McNulty MassDOT D5 Barbara Lachance OCPC Charles Kilmer MassDOT D5 Pam Haznar OCPC Mary Waldron MassDOT Ben Muller OCPC Ray Guarino SRTS Vivian Ortiz 1. Call to Order and Introductions Chairperson Noreen O’Toole called the meeting to order at 12:01 P.M. and then read the Meeting Accessibility Statement and the Title VI Notice of Protection Statement. Bill McNulty then conducted the roll call. 2. Public Comments There were no public comments. 3. Minutes of the March 4, 2021 Meeting Chairperson O’Toole asked if the members had reviewed the minutes of the March 4, 2021 Meeting. A vote on acceptance of the meeting minutes was deferred until the next (May 2021) meeting. 4. Communications Shawn Bailey reviewed the contents of the communications staff report. Included were letters of correspondence, as well as notices of workshops and conferences. They are as follows: • MassDOT Announces $2.8 Million in Shared Winter Streets and Spaces Program Funding Awards Old Colony Joint Transportation Committee Minutes of April 1, 2021 Meeting 70 School Street, Brockton, MA 02301-4097 Page 1 of 9 OLD COLONY JOINT TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (JTC) • Massachusetts Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Spring Webinar – New Tools for Schools – April 14, 2021 • Virtual 2021 MassDOT Transportation Innovation Conference – May 25-27, 2021 • Community One Stop for Growth • MBTA To Restore Service to Pre-Pandemic Levels 5. -
2021 Capital Investment Program Appendix A
2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN APPENDIX A: INVESTMENT DETAILS Appendix A: Investment Details This section provides the lists of investments contained within this CIP. The information within each column is described below: • Location – where the investment is located • Project ID – the Division specific ID that uniquely identifies each investment • Project name – the name of the investment and a brief description • Priority – the capital priority that the investment addresses • Program – the program from which the investment is made • Score – the score of the investment (reliability investments are not scored) • Total cost – the total cost of the investment • Prior years – the spending on the investment that pre-dates the plan update • FY 2021 – the spending estimated to occur in fiscal year 2021 • Post FY 2021 – the estimated spending to occur post fiscal year 2021 for the project APPENDIX A: INVESTMENT DETAILS 2021 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PLAN ii Aeronautics 2021 Capital Investment Plan Total Prior Years 2021 After 2021 Location Division ID Priority Program Project Description Score $M $M $M $M Barnstable Municipal Aeronautics | Airport AE21000002 1 | Reliability SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 1 $0.72 $0.00 $0.72 $0.00 Airport capital improvement Aeronautics | Airport MEPA/NEPA/CCC FOR MASTER PLAN AE21000003 1 | Reliability 1 $0.80 $0.53 $0.28 $0.00 capital improvement IMPROVEMENTS Aeronautics | Airport AE21000023 1 | Reliability AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1 $1.12 $0.00 $0.05 $1.07 capital improvement Aeronautics | Airport PURCHASE SNOW REMOVAL EQUIPMENT -
FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
FULLTIME FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study FINAL REPORT September 1, 2010 Prepared For: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority With Support From: Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development Prepared By: Jacobs Engineering Group, Boston, MA With: Central Transportation Planning Staff, Boston , MA Anne S. Gailbraith, AICP Barrington, RI 1 REPORT NAME: Foxborough Commuter Rail Feasibility Study PROJECT NUMBER: A92PS03, Task Order No. 2 PREPARED FOR: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) PREPARED BY: Jacobs Engineering Group Anne S. Galbraith Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) DATE: September 1, 2010 FOXBOROUGH COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1: IDENTIFY KEY ISSUES AND PROJECT APPROACH .................................................... 13 1.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 14 1.2 Key Issues....................................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Approach ......................................................................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 2: ANALYZE THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM.............................................