DOCSLIB.ORG

Tartuffe, by Moliere, Translated by Richard Wilbur Presented by Perisphere Theater Resources for Teachers and Students

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tartuffe, by Moliere, Translated by Richard Wilbur Presented by Perisphere Theater Resources for Teachers and Students Tartuffe, by Moliere, translated by Richard Wilbur Presented by Perisphere Theater Resources for teachers and students January/February 2018 Created by Heather Benjamin and Bridget Grace Sheaff, 2017 Context for Tartuffe PLOT The story takes place in the home of the wealthy Orgon, where Tartuffe—a fraud and a pious imposter—has insinuated himself. He succeeds in winning the respect and devotion of the head of the house and then tries to marry his daughter, seduce his wife and scrounge the deed to the property. Tartuffe nearly gets away with it, but an emissary from King Louis XIV arrives in time to recover the property, free Monsieur Orgon and haul Tartuffe off to jail. His Frontispiece of the one of the earliest duplicity, lies, and overall trickery are finally exposed printings of Tartuffe, depicting the most and punished. famous scene, from a 1739 collected edition of his works in French and English, printed by John Watts. —Dramatists Play Service summary PLAY STYLE Molière’s dramatic roots lie in Old French farce, the unscripted popular plays that featured broad characters with robust attitudes and vulgar ways, emphasized a strong physical style of performance, and were an entertainment staple in the town marketplace and on the fairground. He was, likewise, greatly influenced by his interaction with the Italian commedia dell'arte performers who were known for both their improvisational skills and highly physical playing, and for the everyday truth they brought to their lively theatrical presentations. The “new brand” of French comedy, which Molière developed and perfected, featured the vivacity and physicality of farce, tempered by a commedia-inspired naturalness of character. What is at the heart of Molière's A sampling of the stock commedia dell'arte figures from the dramatic style, and what made his plays Italian tradition. Moliere would have drawn heavily from their comedic influence in writing his characters. unique for their time, is their satirical bent, brilliant intellect, sharp wit, emphasis on the ironic, and a strong sense of what the dramatist himself viewed as morality. He held a mirror up to both human nature and French society to reflect the comic glory (or horror) of their frailty, stupidity, iniquity and hypocrisy. —McCarter Theatre HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: LOUISE XIV • Louis XIV reigned from 1643 until 1715. • He reformed the state, secured the obedience of the French elites, expanded his army to the largest in Europe, and encouraged the growth of colonies abroad. He established a glittering court at Versailles and promoted the arts. • Often known as “The Sun King,” he became a model other European rulers strove to emulate. • Louis XIV’s main philosophy was the perfection of France, the crown, and the monarchy. • Louis XIV’s aggressive foreign policy led to a new round of wars, specifically The Nine Year’s War beginning in 1688 between the France and a collation made up of almost every major power in Europe, including the Holy Roman Empire. Louis XIV of France, king during the tenure of Moliere, was often called the Sun King —Oxford University Press and believed in the perfection of France and its king. RECEPTION AND SUPPRESSION OF THE PLAY Molière wrote Tartuffe in 1664. Almost immediately following its first performance, it was censored by King Louis XIV, probably due to the influence of the archbishop of Paris, Paul Philippe Hardouin de Beaumont de Péréfixe, who was the king's confessor and had been his tutor. Although Tartuffe was received well by the public and even by Louis XIV, it immediately sparked conflict among many different groups who were offended by the play. The factions opposed to Molière's work included part of the hierarchy of the French Roman Catholic Church, members of upper-class French society, and the illegal underground organization called the Compagnie du Saint-Sacrement. Tartuffe's popularity was cut short when the Archbishop of Paris issued an edict threatening excommunication for anyone The edict declaring the prohibition who watched, performed in, or read the play. Molière against The Imposter by the attempted to mollify church officials by rewriting his play to Archbishop of Paris (August 11, 1667) seem more secular and less critical of religion, but the church could not be budged. Even during Molière's conflict with the church, Louis XIV continued to support the playwright; it is possible that without the king's support, Molière might have been excommunicated. Although public performances of the play were banned, private performances for the French aristocracy were permitted. In 1669, after Molière's detractors lost much of their influence, he was finally allowed to perform the final version of his play. However, due to all the controversy surrounding Tartuffe, Molière mostly refrained from writing such incisive plays as this one again. —Wikipedia entry Questions for Discussion After seeing Tartuffe, answer the following questions in small groups or as a class: • Do you agree that “to know the comic we must know the rational”? What does this mean? How does comedy point out what is rational and make a contrast with it? • What do you think about satirical works of art that imply criticism of a current authority, social or political phenomenon, or practice? Should they be presented to the public or censored? Are they dangerous, or are they valuable? • What about satire based on human nature and foibles? How does this play present both aspects? • How do the characters in this play represent different points of view and levels of rationality? Which characters behave rationally? Which behave irrationally? Do they change throughout the course of the play? • How do you define “hypocrisy”? Is it easy or difficult to see when you or other people are behaving this way? What makes it obvious? • In your life, have there been works of art have you seen, listened to, or participated in that generated controversy, but to which you responded strongly? Why were they controversial? What aspects of society or human nature did they point out? • Did this play remind you of anything? What examples from your life (media, news, entertainment, etc.) did you see in the play? • Was there anything confusing or that you would like to learn more about? • Did you find yourself agreeing or disagreeing with any character in particular? Did you find yourself identifying with any character or moment especially? Why do you think that was? • What would have done differently from any of the characters in the play? What would you have done differently than Orgon? What would you have done if you were Orgon’s children (Mariane and Damis)? What would you have done if you were Dorine? Classroom Activities 1. Think about what happens after the play when the family’s legal issues are cleared up and they get their house back. What do you think becomes of the family? Consider how Orgon did not believe his own family, disowned his own son, and gave everything belonging to the family to Tartuffe. Write a scene between Orgon and Damis, Orgon and Elmire, or Mariane and Valère, describing what happened to their relationship because of Tartuffe’s disturbance among the family. 2. Write a journal entry from Tartuffe’s point of view, describing what happened to him after the play. Do you think he tries this on another family? Do you think he’s learned his lesson? What do you think he does next? 3. Act II, Scene 3, as translated by Wilbur, includes the word “tartuffified.” Dorine (to Mariane): You deserve to be tartuffified! Considering this word, which is not in the dictionary and has been created from Tartuffe’s name, create a definition for the term. 4. Do some research on the characters and styles in commedia dell’arte. Identify which stock commedia character each character from Tartuffe reminds you of. Name three lazzi (comic bits) that you remember from the production. Think about the scope of comedy in general. What parts of this play were funny? Why? Did it have a happy ending? Why? 5. Write a short poem or letter from one of the character’s points of view. (A letter from Mariane to Valere, a poem from Tartuffe to Elmire, a long letter from Madame Pernelle to the household.) Use rhyming couplets to pack an extra punch. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Translated by Richard Wilbur Directed by Makaela Pollock
    Translated by Richard Wilbur Directed by Makaela Pollock All original material copyright © Seattle Shakespeare Company 2015 WELCOME Dear Educators, Tartuffe is a wonderful play, and can be great for students. Its major themes of hypocrisy and gullibility provide excellent prompts for good in-class discussions. Who are the “Tartuffes” in our 21st century world? What can you do to avoid being fooled the way Orgon was? Tartuffe also has some challenges that are best to discuss with students ahead of time. Its portrayal of religion as the source of Tartuffe’s hypocrisy angered priests and the deeply religious when it was first written, which led to the play being banned for years. For his part, Molière always said that the purpose of Tartuffe was not to lampoon religion, but to show how hypocrisy comes in many forms, and people should beware of religious hypocrisy among others. There is also a challenging scene between Tartuffe and Elmire at the climax of the play (and the end of Orgon’s acceptance of Tartuffe). When Tartuffe attempts to seduce Elmire, it is up to the director as to how far he gets in his amorous attempts, and in our production he gets pretty far! This can also provide an excellent opportunity to talk with students about staunch “family values” politicians who are revealed to have had affairs, the safety of women in today’s society, and even sexual assault, depending on the age of the students. Molière’s satire still rings true today, and shows how some societal problems have not been solved, but have simply evolved into today’s context.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Teachers' Notes
    Teachers’ Notes Researched and Compiled by Michele Chigwidden Teacher’s Notes Adelaide Festival Centre has contributed to the development and publication of these teachers’ notes through its education program, CentrED. Brink Productions’ by Molière A new adaptation by Paul Galloway Directed by Chris Drummond INTRODUCTION Le Malade imaginaire or The Hypochondriac by French playwright Molière, was written in 1673. Today Molière is considered one of the greatest masters of comedy in Western literature and his work influences comedians and dramatists the world over1. This play is set in the home of Argan, a wealthy hypochondriac, who is as obsessed with his bowel movements as he is with his mounting medical bills. Argan arranges for Angélique, his daughter, to marry his doctor’s nephew to get free medical care. The problem is that Angélique has fallen in love with someone else. Meanwhile Argan’s wife Béline (Angélique’s step mother) is after Argan’s money, while their maid Toinette is playing havoc with everyone’s plans in an effort to make it all right. Molière’s timeless satirical comedy lampoons the foibles of people who will do anything to escape their fear of mortality; the hysterical leaps of faith and self-delusion that, ironically, make us so susceptible to the quackery that remains apparent today. Brink’s adaptation, by Paul Galloway, makes Molière’s comedy even more accessible, and together with Chris Drummond’s direction, the brilliant ensemble cast and design team, creates a playful immediacy for contemporary audiences. These teachers’ notes will provide information on Brink Productions along with background notes on the creative team, cast and a synopsis of The Hypochondriac.
    [Show full text]
  • Tartuffe Or the Hypocrite by Jean Baptiste Poquelin Moliere
    Tartuffe or the Hypocrite by Jean Baptiste Poquelin Moliere Tartuffe or the Hypocrite by Jean Baptiste Poquelin Moliere Etext prepared by Dagny, [email protected] and John Bickers, [email protected] TARTUFFE OR THE HYPOCRITE by JEAN BAPTISTE POQUELIN MOLIERE Translated By Curtis Hidden Page INTRODUCTORY NOTE Jean Baptiste Poquelin, better known by his stage name of Moliere, stands without a rival at the head of French comedy. Born at Paris in January, 1622, where his father held a position in the royal household, he was educated at the Jesuit College de Clermont, and for some time studied law, which he soon abandoned for the stage. His life was spent in Paris and in the provinces, acting, directing page 1 / 151 performances, managing theaters, and writing plays. He had his share of applause from the king and from the public; but the satire in his comedies made him many enemies, and he was the object of the most venomous attacks and the most impossible slanders. Nor did he find much solace at home; for he married unfortunately, and the unhappiness that followed increased the bitterness that public hostility had brought into his life. On February 17, 1673, while acting in "La Malade Imaginaire," the last of his masterpieces, he was seized with illness and died a few hours later. The first of the greater works of Moliere was "Les Precieuses Ridicules," produced in 1659. In this brilliant piece Moliere lifted French comedy to a new level and gave it a new purpose--the satirizing of contemporary manners and affectations by frank portrayal and criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Dorine in Revealing Moral Values In
    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DORINE IN REVEALING MORAL MESSAGES IN MOLIERE’S TARTUFFE AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By BONDAN ADHI WIBOWO Student Number: 024214040 ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2008 i ii iii “Carpe diem, Seize the Day” iv This undergraduate thesis is dedicated to My Beloved Family, My Friends, And those who love me v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The first and foremost, I would like to bestow my deepest gratitude to Jesus Christ for giving me his blessing, strength, chance, and patience. Thanks for always guiding me every second in my life. Secondly, my greatest appreciation goes to my beloved parents, Heru Pramono and Pudjiningtyas, who always give me love, encouragement, and motivation to finish my study. I thank my brother Ivan Adi Prabowo for his love and support in many ways. My gratitude is also for my big family, I thank them. A special thank for my advisor, Maria Ananta Tri Suryandari, S.S., M.Ed., who has always give me her precious time in guiding me to finish this thesis. I thank her for correcting my thesis so that I could complete this thesis. Big thanks, for helping me to realize my ideas. I also would like to thank to my Co. advisor, Paulus Sarwoto, S.S., M.A for his suggestions and ideas. I thank to all lecture in Sanata Dharma University for teaching me many things. My gratitude also goes to all my best friends; Yabes, Sigit Nugraha, Fitra, Leo, David, Dimas, D N G, Yere, Jeff, Maynard, Koh Abun, Garry, Alfa, Parjo, Steva, Wawik.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Moves, Dialectical Opposites, and Mme Pernelle by Allen G
    Opening Moves, Dialectical Opposites, and Mme Pernelle by Allen G. Wood Tartuffe begins with an ending. Mme Pernelle departs from the Orgon household, commanding her servant: “Allons, Flipote, allons, que d’eux je me délivre.” (1). She does not leave, how- ever, without having the last word, or series of last words, as she showers criticism on every member of her extended family, the “eux” (them) from whom she disdainfully distinguishes herself. Dorine is “impertinente,” Damis a “sot,” Mariane is too “dis- crète,” (meaning sneaky). Elmire “dépensière,” while, finally, Cléante is sententious. Her attitude is “têtue et incivile” ( Ledoux, préface), but Mme Pernelle is both correct in her assessment, if wrong in her conclu- sions. Guicharnaud points out that each portrait is an : Erreur de jugement seulement, puisque le contenu de faits de ses portraits est exact. Cette erreur la conduit à des accusations graves. ...La suite de la pièce mettra chaque personnage dans une situation telle qu’il démentira précisément le jugement particulier que Mme Pernelle a porté sur lui au début du premier acte. (25) As the initial scene, it performs the important task of introduc- ing the main characters and the principal subject matter to the audience. As we know, this is especially crucial in a comedy, where neither characters nor plot elements are known by the spec- tators. But the way in which this is achieved in Tartuffe is atypical, even extravagant. The conventional opening scene of the time, and also found in Molière’s other plays, has a couple of characters discussing their situation and that of other characters.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IMAGINARY INVALID ADAPTED by CONSTANCE CONGDON BASED on a NEW TRANSLATION by DAN SMITH TABLE of CONTENTS the Imaginary Invalid Character List
    AUDIENCE GUIDE MOLIÈRE’S THE IMAGINARY INVALID ADAPTED BY CONSTANCE CONGDON BASED ON A NEW TRANSLATION BY DAN SMITH TABLE OF CONTENTS The Imaginary Invalid Character List .................................. 3 Synopsis ........................................................ 4 Playwright Biography: Molière ....................................... 5 Molière Timeline .................................................. 6 Translator and Adaptor Biographies .................................. 7 Translation and Adaptation in The Imaginary Invalid ..................... 8 Themes ......................................................... 9 Quackery and Medicine in 17th Century France ...................... 10 How To Become A Doctor ....................................... 11 Resources & Further Reading ................................... 12 A NOISE WITHIN’S EDUCATION PROGRAMS MADE POSSIBLE IN PART BY: The Ahmanson Foundation, AMC, The Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation, The Michael J. Connell Foundation, The Dick and Sally Roberts Coyote Foundation, The Dwight Stuart Youth Fund, Edison International, The Green Foundation, The Michael & Irene Ross Endowment Fund of the Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors through the Los Angeles County Arts Commission, Metropolitan Associates, National Endowment for the Arts: Shakespeare in American Communities, The Kenneth T. & Eileen L. Norris Foundation, The Ralph M. Parsons Foundation, Pasadena Rotary Club, The Ann Peppers Foundation, The Rose Hills Foundation,
    [Show full text]
  • Theatricality, Voyeurism, and Molière's Misanthrope: Yesterday and Today
    Spring 2004 _41 Theatricality, Voyeurism, and Molière's Misanthrope: Yesterday and Today Jesse Dickson The pleasures of eyeing other people are in many ways common to the seventeenth century and the present, although certain of yesterday's pleasures have tumed into today's embarrassments. In this light, I will view the theatrical economy of Molière's 1666 The Misanthrope in performance, from the perspective of the actors and then of the spectators, to compare their visual relationships, then and today. I share the view of many literary historians that in his satire of both aristocratic and bourgeois orders Molière sets his sights on their various theatrical behaviors, "the histrionic bases of individual and social identity.'" Indeed, The Misanthrope shows different characters play acting for other, spectating characters, and makes us laugh at the narcissistic and often hollow society of the theatrum mundi. However, in this literary view the characters strut about within the confines of the stage, behind the footlights, and the milieu they portray is mostly outside the theater walls, in court and salon. This perspective is somewhat constricting for my purpose. I propose to shift the theatrical frame by focusing on the visual relations between the actors and their immediate audience, relations peculiar to Molière's Palais Royal Theater in the latter part of the seventeenth century. The goal, and my desire, are to reestablish the theatrical dynamic of the period in its specificity, having its own pleasures, its own psychological and ideological
    [Show full text]
  • Repères Sur Dom Juan De Molière
    Séquence II : L'homme et ses masques Repères sur Dom Juan de Molière Quelques repères sur Molière Jean-Baptiste Poquelin, dit Molière, est comédien et dramaturge. Né en 1622 à Paris dans une riche famille de bourgeoisie commerçante, il renonce en 1643 à la charge de tapissier du roi qu’il a héritée de son père au profit de son frère. La même année est constituée la compagnie de l’Illustre Théâtre, dont l’aventure se solde par des réussites et par une débâcle financière qui conduira Molière en prison à deux reprises. De 1647 à 1658, il parcourt les routes de France avec l’appui de divers protecteurs, dont le prince de Conti, quatrième personnage du royaume, qui deviendra un dévot 1 hostile au théâtre. C’est sous le patronage de Monsieur, frère du roi, que la troupe de Molière parvient à revenir à Paris et à jouer devant Louis XIV en octobre 1658 : la virtuosité de l’acteur et le rythme de la farce séduisent le monarque. Durant ses premières saisons parisiennes, Molière garde les yeux fixés sur le grand genre qu’est la tragédie, mais ce sont ses comédies qui achèveront de bâtir sa renommée. Parmi ses « grandes comédies » figurent au premier chef Dom Juan (1665), Le Misanthrope (1666) et Le Tartuffe ou l’Imposteur (1669), mais aussi L’École des femmes (1662), Les Femmes savantes (1672), Le Bourgeois gentilhomme (1670), la plus fameuse et la plus réussie de ses comédies-ballets, écrite avec le musicien Lulli, ou encore Le Malade imaginaire (1673). Après plus d’une décennie de batailles et de succès, qui aura vu la troupe de Molière devenir « troupe du roi », en dépit des cabales, le dramaturge s’éteint le 17 février 1673, à l’issue d’une des premières représentations de cette ultime pièce.
    [Show full text]
  • Moliere: a Produgihg Director's Approach
    Molière; a producing director's approach to Tartuffe Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Keyworth, Robert Allen, 1918- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 13:21:48 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551398 .MOLIERE: A PRODUGIHG DIRECTOR'S APPROACH TO TARTUPEE ■ ' "by . Robert A » Keyworth A Thesis Submitted Do- the Faculty of the ' : ' . / DEPARTMENT, vpF. :■ DRAMA Ih Partial.Fulfillment of the Requirements , r v: For , the .Degree of . : MASTER OF ARTS . ■ In the Graduate College STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial ful­ fillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate ac­ knowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: / Z APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: / .3', /_ 9 ? PETER R.
    [Show full text]
  • Molière, Le Tartuffe and Anti-Jesuit Propaganda ANDREW CALDER
    Molière, Le Tartuffe and Anti-Jesuit Propaganda ANDREW CALDER Critics agree that when Tartuffe reassures Elmire that he is an expert in the science which has removed the need for conscience in Christians he is expounding his version of the probabilist casuistry made popular by the Jesuits and satirised in Pascal's Provinciales. There is general agree- ment however that Le Tartuffe is not a satire of the Jesuits particu- larly but of many kinds of religious abuse and hypocrisy.' The repressive zeal of Tartuffe and Orgon is viewed as an attack on Jansenist rigorism, and the unscrupulous machinations of Tartuffe and Monsieur Loyal are taken to reflect the conduct of the secret affairs of the Compagnie du Saint-Sacrement. I have come to believe, from reading anti-Jesuit pro- paganda in the seventeenth century, that the hypocrisy so skilfully turned by Moliere into a subject for high comedy was meant to be of a specifically Jesuit kind. The rigorism of the Jansenists and the little- publicised activities of the Compagnie du Saint-Sacrement hardly compare as subjects for popular satire with the Jesuits, who were regarded by many seventeenth-century Frenchmen as an army of papal and Spanish spies. In comparing Le Tartuffe with anti-Jesuit propaganda it is of course all too easy to talk of Moliere's play as if it were simply a polemical tract. I am aware that people who have never even heard of the Jesuits or the Jansenists can and do appreciate the genius of the play- wright who so entertainingly portrays the timeless human foibles of self- love, gullibility and hypocrisy at work.
    [Show full text]
  • Dp Le Tartuffe
    Dossier de presse Paris, le 10 juillet 2014 LA TROUPE DE LA COMÉDIE-FRANÇAISE PRÉSENTE SALLE RICHELIEU DU 20 SEPTEMBRE 2014 AU 17 FÉVRIER 2015 Tartuffe Comédie en cinq actes de Molière mise en scène Galin Stoev avec Claude MATHIEU Madame Pernelle I Michel FAVORY Monsieur Loyal I Cécile BRUNE Dorine I Michel VUILLERMOZ Tartuffe I Elsa LEPOIVRE Elmire I Serge BAGDASSARIAN Cléante I Nâzim BOUDJENAH Valère I Didier SANDRE Orgon I Anna CERVINKA Mariane I Christophe MONTENEZ Damis et les élèves-comédiens de la Comédie-Française Claire Boust, Ewen Crovella, Thomas Guené, Valentin Rolland NOUVELLE MISE EN SCÈNE Collaboration artistique Frédérique PLAIN I Scénographie Alban HO VAN I Costumes Bjanka ADŽIĆ URSULOV I Lumières Elsa REVOL I Musique originale Sacha CARLSON Représentations à la Salle Richelieu , matinées à 14h, soirées à 20h30 . Prix des places de 5 € à 41 €. Renseignements et réservation : tous les jours de 11h à 18h aux guichets du théâtre et par téléphone au 0825 10 16 80 (0,15 € la minute) , sur le site Internet www.comedie-francaise.fr Générales de presse les 22, 24 et 25 septembre à 20h30 Contact presse Vanessa Fresney Tél 01 44 58 15 44 Courriel [email protected] Tartuffe Orgon et sa mère, Madame Pernelle, ne jurent que par Tartuffe, qui se dit dévot et vit à leurs crochets. Les autres membres de la famille partagent quant à eux le sentiment de la suivante Dorine, scandalisée par l’emprise de l’homme d’église sur son maître. Ils vont tout entreprendre pour convaincre Orgon que Tartuffe est un hypocrite de la pire espèce.
    [Show full text]
  • The King's Men: Molière and Lully's Comédies-Ballets
    THE KING’S MEN: MOLIÈRE AND LULLY’S COMÉDIES-BALLETS AND THE POLITICS OF PATRONAGE DURING THE REIGN OF LOUIS XIV, 1661-1673 by Serena Frechter A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Baltimore, Maryland April, 2018 Abstract This paper examines Louis XIV’s patronage of the arts as a tool to consolidate his absolutist rule through a close study of his patron-client relationship with Jean-Baptiste Pouqelin, more commonly known as Molière, and Jean-Baptiste Lully, and the comédies-ballets the pair produced during the first decade of Louis’ personal rule. By first establishing Louis’ development of an absolutist order through relation-based systems, such venal offices and the intendant system, I show how Louis created and expanded parallel systems of control in the arts, through Académies, patronage, and privileges. I then consider how Louis further used performative rituals and physical representations of his power to reinforce this absolutist agenda. It was in this environment in which the arts were integrated as a critical aspect of Louis’ quest for political control that the comédie-ballet developed. Focusing specifically on two of Molière and Lully’s comedies-ballets, Les Fâcheux and Le Bourgeouis Gentilhomme, this paper proceeds to demonstrate how both the production and the performance of the comédies-ballets served the Sun King’s wider political goals. The artists benefitted from their relationship with the King through patronage and privileges; in return they created these comédies-ballets. By examining the evolution of Louis’ patronage of Molière and Lully beyond the initial comédies-ballets, I demonstrate how Lully adapted to Louis’ shifting political visions and gained enormous power as a result, while Molière deviated from the changing absolutist agenda and thus remained only modestly powerful.
    [Show full text]