DOCSLIB.ORG

Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy 2 Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy 2 Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy 2 Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy About Guardian Group strategy Our tax position in the Guardian Media Group and results year ended 2 April 2017 Guardian Media Group is one This year, the Group has The Group is committed to Media of the UK’s leading media continued to implement the reporting on its tax position in a organisations. We exist to three-year plan launched in transparent manner and makes Group Tax support quality, independent January 2016, the goals of which extensive disclosures relating and liberal journalism. Our core are to: to tax in its annual financial Strategy business is Guardian News & statements. An abridged version • Address the balance of costs Media, which publishes the of the disclosures for the year- and revenues at the Group, theguardian.com website ended 2 April 2017 detailing focusing on new revenue and the Guardian and the the corporation tax position This tax strategy applies streams including reader Observer newspapers. of the Group is included as an revenues and international across the Guardian Appendix to this document. Media Group. This The parent company of the growth Group is The Scott Trust Ltd, The Group’s business operations • Build a far deeper set of document, approved by a UK tax resident company, in the UK, US and Australia relationships with our which was established to secure have historically been loss the Executive Board of audience; and Guardian Media Group the financial and editorial making. These historic losses independence of the Guardian • Reduce the Guardian’s cost were legitimately used to plc sets out the Group’s in perpetuity. base by 20% offset taxable profits and gains approach to conducting that arose in the year which The Group has business The Group is on track to meant that the Group paid no its tax affairs and dealing operations in the UK, US and achieve the aim of the plan, Corporation Tax in the year with tax risks for the Australia. All companies in the for Guardian News & Media to ended 2 April 2017. year ending 2 April 2017. Group are incorporated in these break even at an EBITDA level Guardian Media Group countries, hold all of the Group’s by 2018/19, and for the Group to The Group collects and pays assets and are fully subject become financially sustainable indirect and payroll taxes in the regards the publication to prevailing tax laws and in perpetuity. countries in which it operates. of this tax strategy as regulations. In 2017, the Group collected and For the year ending 2 April 2017 paid £49.8million of income complying with the duty The Group also has an the Group reported revenues of taxes and social security endowment fund which exists £214.5m, up 2% on the previous under paragraph 16(2) associated with its employees. of Schedule 19 of the solely to support and fund our year, as the Guardian continued journalism. The endowment to strengthen its relationship Finance Act 2016. fund consists of diversified with its readers and saw good medium and long term focused growth from Guardian US and investments managed by a Guardian Australia. number of specialist fund In a significant move towards managers. The investments securing the Group’s long-term include global and emerging future, the value of the Group’s markets equity, fixed income, investments and cash holdings hedge funds and private equity has risen to £1.03 billion. This and venture capital funds. was due to a 20.6% increase in Whilst the investments are the value of the endowment a mixture of UK and non-UK fund and the sale of the Group’s assets, they are all held by UK 22.4% stake in Ascential plc, tax resident companies in the the international business- Group which are fully subject to to-business media and events UK tax laws and regulations on group, for a gross consideration all of the income and realised of £239m. gains arising from all of the investments held. During the year, the Group reduced its costs by £19 million Our values to £259.2m, and reduced CP Scott, the famous headcount by approximately Manchester Guardian editor, 300 FTE roles. These moves, outlined the paper’s principles painful though necessary, in his celebrated centenary enabled the Group to reduce leader on May 5, 1921. The losses at the EBITDA level by much-quoted article is still 35% to £44.7m before £9.6m of used to explain the values of exceptional costs. the present-day newspaper, Trust and Group. The values he described are: honesty; cleanness (today interpreted as integrity); courage; fairness; and a sense of duty to the reader and the community. 3 Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy Our tax strategy Our approach to governance The level of risk in relation Our tax strategy seeks to enable and support arrangements and to UK taxation that we are the Group’s business strategy by managing risk management prepared to accept tax risks and costs in a manner consistent Governance arrangements The Group has a low appetite for tax risk and with The Scott Trust values. manages its tax affairs accordingly. Whilst The Guardian Media Group plc Board standardised, acceptable levels of tax risk Our tax strategy consists of four key approves the Group’s tax strategy. From are not formally documented or quantified, principles: an operational perspective, the Audit tax risk is primarily managed with the aim Committee, made up primarily of 1. We manage our tax affairs in a manner of complying with all relevant laws and independent non-executive directors, is consistent with the values of The Scott regulations and preventing and reducing tax considered to be the supervisory body for all Trust and the organisation’s purpose disputes and uncertainty. to secure the financial and editorial Group tax activities and monitors on-going independence of the Guardian in compliance with the tax strategy. This is achieved by maintaining documented perpetuity and to support journalistic policies and procedures in relation to The head of tax is responsible for ensuring freedom and liberal values. tax risk management and maintaining that appropriate procedures and guidelines open and constructive relationships with 2. We seek to act lawfully and with integrity are established, and suitable training and tax authorities. when managing our tax affairs by paying education provided to support the four and collecting tax in accordance with strategic principles detailed above. Our attitude towards all relevant laws and regulations in the The head of tax meets regularly with the tax planning countries in which we operate. If we Chief Financial Officer and Finance Director discover instances of non-compliance we Our attitude to tax planning is governed by seek to resolve them with the appropriate to discuss tax matters as they arise including the four key strategic principles detailed tax authority. the impact of the introduction of new tax above in the ‘Our tax strategy’ section. The legislation on the Group, the tax implications Group may engage in tax planning in order 3. We only engage in reasonable and of changes to the Group’s operations and the to manage its tax costs and an assessment sustainable tax planning that is aligned outcomes of tax risk management reviews. of the appropriateness of doing so is made with commercial and economic activity. against all four principles to ensure they are This means: The head of tax reports at least annually to the Audit Committee on the tax position of adhered to. • We do not enter into artificial tax the Group and the on-going adherence to the External tax advice is taken from time arrangements; tax strategy. to time where clarification of the tax • We only respond to tax incentives and Risk management implications of the Group’s activities is exemptions in the manner in which they required. were intended; and Tax risks can arise as a result of changes in tax legislation and changes to the Group’s Our approach towards our • All transactions between Group underlying operating model, systems and dealings with HMRC companies are carried out on an arms- processes. The head of tax is responsible length basis. for ensuring that the Group’s tax position A constructive relationship with HMRC is and tax risk management procedures are important in the operation of the Group’s 4. We are open and transparent with tax tax strategy. authorities and provide all relevant and regularly reviewed to enable the appropriate reasonable information that is necessary management of tax risk. We engage in an open and transparent for them to fully understand our tax The tax function actively assesses and way with HMRC to allow them to fully affairs. monitors UK tax risk throughout the year understand our tax affairs. Where by maintaining a detailed tax risk register, appropriate we engage with them on a which documents the processes and controls timely basis and seek advance clearance, implemented to mitigate the risks. The tax either formally or informally, on the tax risk register is reviewed regularly during implications of a transaction or a change to the year to ensure its completeness and to our business. check the effectiveness of the processes and We have a track record of pro-actively controls. The outcomes of the reviews are bringing tax issues in our business to the discussed with the Chief Financial Officer attention of HMRC and collaboratively and Finance Director and, where issues are working with them to resolve these as identified, new processes and controls are quickly as possible. designed and implemented. 4 Guardian Media Group Tax Strategy The following abridged Appendix: disclosures detail the corporate Abridged tax disclosures tax position of the Guardian Media Group for the year ended 2 in the Guardian Media April 2017.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City Space and Urban Identity a Post-9/11 Consciousness in Australian Fiction 2005 to 2011
    City Space and Urban Identity A Post-9/11 Consciousness in Australian Fiction 2005 to 2011 By Lydia Saleh Rofail A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English. Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences The University of Sydney 2019 Declaration of Originality I affirm that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and I certify and warrant to the best of my knowledge that all sources of reference have been duly and fully acknowledged. Lydia Saleh Rofail i Abstract This thesis undertakes a detailed examination of a close corpus of five Australian literary novels published between 2005 and 2011, to assess the political, social, and cultural implications of 9/11 upon an urban Australian identity. My analysis of the literary city will reveal how this identity is trapped between layers of trauma which include haunting historical atrocities and inward nationalism, as well as the contrasting outward pull of global aspirations. Dead Europe by Christos Tsiolkas (2005), The Unknown Terrorist by Richard Flanagan (2006), Underground by Andrew McGahan (2006), Breath by Tim Winton (2008), and Five Bells by Gail Jones (2011) are uniquely varied narratives written in the shadow of 9/11. These novels reconfigure fictional notions of Australian urbanism in order to deal with fears and threats posed by 9/11 and the fallout that followed, where global interests fed into national concerns and discourses within Australia and resonated down to local levels. Adopting an Australia perspective, this thesis contextualises subsequent traumatic and apocalyptic trajectories in relation to urbanism and Australian identity in a post-9/11 world.
    [Show full text]
  • Pommy Media Causing a Stir in Australia
    Pommy media causing a stir in Australia blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2014/10/25/pommy-media-causing-a-stir-in-australia/ 2014-10-25 The Australian media landscape is becoming a little heated as recent British entrants continue to carve out new digital territory in the Land Down Under. Colleen Murrell reports on the increasing levels of distrust both between the players – The Australian versions of The Guardian, the Daily Mail and the BBC – and between those players and the tough local media groups, Fairfax Media and Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. Australia. Last Thursday the chief executive of Guardian Media Group, Andrew Miller, gave the annual Polis lecture in London in which he didn’t appear to welcome the BBC’s expansion into Australia. He disputed that this should be a “core part” of the BBC’s mission and said it did not “benefit UK licence fee payers or meet the requirement of the BBC to provide news in parts of the world where there are limited alternatives”. He added. “It threatens a distortion that is not in the interests of audiences or other UK news providers”. Alluding to the ‘licence fee payers’ is disingenuous as the expanded website venture isn’t funded by the licence fee but is a commercial enterprise that will be financed by advertising. It is therefore the second part of the allegation – that it is not in the interests of “other UK news providers” – that really bothers the Guardian. Earlier this month the BBC recruited The Sydney Morning Herald’s Chief of Staff Wendy Frew, showing that it is committed to serious newsgathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Working Group on Private Military and Security Companies in Immigration Enforcement
    Submission to the Working Group on Private Military and Security Companies in Immigration Enforcement 21 July 2020 Convicted New Zealander experiences with Serco security company, law and border enforcement personnel in immigration detention and s501 deportation from Australia Rebecca Powell, Managing-Director and PhD Candidate, The Border Crossing Observatory, Monash University. Introduction and background This submission has been developed from my research on the deportation of convicted New Zealanders from Australia under Section 501 –visa cancellation and refusal on character grounds – of the Commonwealth Migration Act 1958.1 My research is focused from when legislative amendments were made to s501 in December 2014 resulting in a steep increase in the number of convicted non-citizens experiencing visa cancellation and deportation from Australia under s501 by 1,100% (Australian Government, Department of Home Affairs, Visa Statistics website) following the introduction of mandatory visa cancellation provisions.2 Since these amendments, New Zealanders are the largest nationality group deported from Australia. From December 2014 to July 2020, the visas of 2,877 New Zealanders have been cancelled on character grounds under s501 (Australian Border Force 2020). From 2015-2018, 1,144 New Zealanders have been deported from Australia (Department of Home Affairs). New Zealanders continue to be consistently recorded as the largest or second largest nationality group in Australia’s immigration detention network from August 2015, whereas they were not even recorded as a nationality group before this time because their numbers were so low (Australian Government, Department of Home Affairs, Immigration Detention Statistics website). An analysis I have conducted of New Zealander visa cancellation review cases at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) reveals that over 70% of these cases 1 See, ‘Risk and human rights in the deportation of convicted non-citizens from Australia to New Zealand’ The Border Crossing Observatory.
    [Show full text]
  • GRATTAN Institute
    GRATTAN Institute The course of COVID-19 in Australia Submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Australian Government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic June 2020 Stephen Duckett, Hal Swerissen, Will Mackey, Anika Stobart and Hugh Parsonage Grattan Institute 2020 1 Overview The SARS-CoV-2 virus (coronavirus) galvanised a public health shutdowns, and the need for vigilance and swift responses to response not seen in Australia for more than a century. To prevent its outbreaks. spread, and the disease it causes, COVID-19, social and economic activity was shut down. Australia emerged with low numbers of Choices are being made about how and when the lockdown will be deaths, and a health system which coped with the outbreak. eased, with each state and territory taking a different path. While the virus continues to circulate, there will be a risk of a second wave. Australia’s response passed through four stages – containment, reassurance amid uncertainty, cautious incrementalism, and then In this report we describe a model developed at Grattan Institute escalated national action – as the gathering storm of the pandemic which simulates the risks of different relaxation strategies, and we became more apparent. draw some lessons for the health system. We show that some strategies, such as reopening schools, involve some risk of There were four key successes in the response: cooperative outbreaks, but these outbreaks most likely can be controlled. We governance informed by experts (most notably seen in the highlight those strategies which are riskier, particularly reopening establishment of the National Cabinet), closure of international large workplaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking News
    BREAKING NEWS First published in Great Britain in 2018 by Canongate Books Ltd, 14 High Street, Edinburgh EH1 1TE canongate.co.uk This digital edition first published in 2018 by Canongate Books Copyright © Alan Rusbridger, 2018 The moral right of the author has been asserted British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available on request from the British Library ISBN 978 1 78689 093 1 Export ISBN 978 1 78689 094 8 eISBN 978 1 78689 095 5 To Lindsay and Georgina who, between them, shared most of this journey Contents Introduction 1. Not Bowling Alone 2. More Than a Business 3. The New World 4. Editor 5. Shedding Power 6. Guardian . Unlimited 7. The Conversation 8. Global 9. Format Wars 10. Dog, Meet Dog 11. The Future Is Mutual 12. The Money Question 13. Bee Information 14. Creaking at the Seams 15. Crash 16. Phone Hacking 17. Let Us Pay? 18. Open and Shut 19. The Gatekeepers 20. Members? 21. The Trophy Newspaper 22. Do You Love Your Country? 23. Whirlwinds of Change Epilogue Timeline Bibliography Acknowledgements Also by Alan Rusbridger Notes Index Introduction By early 2017 the world had woken up to a problem that, with a mixture of impotence, incomprehension and dread, journalists had seen coming for some time. News – the thing that helped people understand their world; that oiled the wheels of society; that pollinated communities; that kept the powerful honest – news was broken. The problem had many different names and diagnoses. Some thought we were drowning in too much news; others feared we were in danger of becoming newsless.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIA, ADANI and the WANGAN and JAGALINGOU the Material Costs of Claiming International Human Rights STEPHEN M YOUNG*
    THE MATERIAL COSTS OF CLAIMING INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS: AUSTRALIA, ADANI AND THE WANGAN AND JAGALINGOU The Material Costs of Claiming International Human Rights STEPHEN M YOUNG* This article presents a materialist account of Indigenous peoples’ international legal human rights claims. It argues that appeals to the global legal system as well as pluralistic approaches to Indigenous peoples’ rights depend on international law to make a convincing case and yet fail to account for the material construction of human rights claimants as subjects of international law. To explain this intervention, this article theorises that when international human rights law and national laws clash, human rights claimants constitute and transform themselves into international legal subjects and become identifiable Indigenous peoples. In support of this international legal constructivist approach to Indigenous peoples’ human rights claims, this article re-articulates the development of Indigenous peoples as subjects that emerged from international law and then examines the development of Australia’s native title regime. An exposition of international and then state laws reveals that the codification of different standards for participation enables those who subject themselves to international law as Indigenous peoples to claim human rights. It then provides a case study on the Wangan and Jagalingou Family Council, which constructed itself as Indigenous peoples to assert human rights, as they engage with Australia’s native title regime in the case against Adani Mining Pty Ltd’s Carmichael Coal Mine and Rail Project. A central aspect of this argument is that becoming identifiable Indigenous peoples through claiming human rights provides benefits as well as potentially deleterious political, economic and legal costs.
    [Show full text]
  • UPHOLDING the AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
    UPHOLDING the AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION Volume 29 Proceedings of the 29th Conference of The Samuel Griffith Society Novotel Perth Langley 221 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 25-27 August 2017 2018 by The Samuel Griffith Society. All rights reserved. Published 2018 by The Samuel Griffith Society PO Box 13076, Law Courts VICTORIA 8010 World Wide Web Address: http://www.samuelgriffith.org.au Printed by: McPherson’s Printing Pty Ltd 76 Nelson Street, Maryborough, Vic 3465 National Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data: Upholding the Australian Constitution Volume 29 Proceedings of The Samuel Griffith Society ISSN 1327-1539 ii Contents Introduction Eddy Gisonda v The Zeitgeist and the Constitution The 2017 Sir Harry Gibbs Memorial Oration The Honourable P. A. Keane ix 1. Fake News, Federalism and the Love Media Chris Kenny 1 2. The Unconstitutionality of Outlawing Political Opinion Augusto Zimmermann 17 3. Government not Gridlock Tony Abbott 49 4. In Defence of the Senate James Paterson 57 5. Western Australia and the GST Mike Nahan 69 6. Western Australia and Secession David Leyonhjelm 79 iii 7. Workplace Rights and the States Daniel White 89 8. Causes of Coming Discontents: The European Union as a Role Model for Australia? Neville Rochow 103 9. Federalism and the High Court in the 21 st Century The Honourable Robert Mitchell 181 10. Federalism and the Principle of Subsidiarity Michelle Evans 201 11. Passing the Buck The Honourable Wayne Martin 227 12. The Aboriginal Question: Enough is Enough! John Stone 273 13. A Colour-blind Constitution Keith Wolahan 319 14. Recognition Roulette The Honourable Nicholas Hasluck 337 Contributors 355 iv Introduction Eddy Gisonda The Samuel Griffith Society held its 29 th Conference on the weekend of 25 to 27 August 2017, in the city of Perth, Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Openbook Autumn 2021
    The Grubby Urchins Markus Zusak Anchuli Felicia King library sea shanty new story free to write AUTUMN 2021 2021 AUTUMN Tool-sharpening grooves in the Cattai area, near Dyarubbin, the Hawkesbury River (Lyra, great-granddaughter of Darug Elder Aunty Edna Watson, playing in rock pool), photo by Joy Lai The Dyarubbin exhibition at the State Library of NSW opens on 27 March 2021, see page 44 AUTUMN 2021 Openbook is designed and printed on the traditional and ancestral lands of the Gadigal people of the Eora nation. The State Library of NSW offers our respect to Aboriginal Elders past, present and future, and extends that respect to other First Nations people. We celebrate the strength and diversity of NSW Aboriginal cultures, languages and stories. Find out why the world went mad about sea shanties, page 20 20 Contents Features 8 Self-portrait 44 Following the river Anchuli Felicia King Marika Duczynski 10 Turning pages 50 What about the sheilas? Neha Kale Elizabeth Fortescue 18 Preserving history 56 Words across cities Hannah James Bri Lee 20 Shanty town Mark Dapin 26 Beyond belief Patrick Mullins 30 Photo essay — These walls 4 / OPENBOOK : Autumn 21 38 50 64 90 Fiction Articles Regulars 38 The alarm clock 60 A lonelier planet? 7 Openbook obsessions Markus Zusak Tony Wheeler 16 Take 5 — Cars 64 Gifts from the sea 76 Reviews Poetry Sarah Morley 78 Shelfie 68 Finding Charlotte 62 Instructions 79 Just in before forgetting Kate Forsyth Eunice Andrada 82 Model maker 80 Cartoon Mathilde de Hauteclocque 81 Just made Debate 88 Interview 84 How to
    [Show full text]
  • Disruption and Innovation in the Australian Book Industry: Case Studies of Trade and Education Publishers RESEARCH PAPER 1/2016 (FEBRUARY 2016)
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Faculty of Business and Economics Macquarie Economics Research Papers Disruption and innovation in the Australian book industry: Case studies of trade and education publishers RESEARCH PAPER 1/2016 (FEBRUARY 2016) Jan Zwar Number 1/2016 February 2016 ISSN 1833-5020 (print) 1834-2469 (online) Zwar, Jan Disruption and innovation in the Australian book industry: Case studies of trade and education publishers Research paper 1/2016 (February 2016) ISSN 1833-5020 (print) 1834-2469 (online) Published by the Department of Economics, Macquarie University Building E4A, Room 443 Eastern Avenue Macquarie University NSW 2109 Tel: +61 2 9850 8474 Email: [email protected] Papers in the series are also available at www.econ.mq.edu.au/research Disruption and innovation in the Australian book industry: Case studies of trade and education publishers Jan Zwar1 ABSTRACT The disruption and structural transformation underway in the global book industry is well known. Major changes include the development of technology which enables digital publishing, distribution and retailing; the entry of disruptive players including Amazon, Google and Apple; the introduction of hand- held digital reading platforms and devices; upheavals in the bricks and mortar retailing sector; and the rise of online and social media as important channels for promoting books. Education publishers are also affected by disruption taking place in the education sector itself, further complicating their business models and operations. To date there has been little systematic examination of the responses of Australian publishers to change and the ways in which traditional publishers are experimenting and innovating, both as defensive responses and initiating change themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Diversity and Press Freedom: the Debate Over Australia’S News Media Landscape
    December 2020 MEDIA DIVERSITY AND PRESS FREEDOM: THE DEBATE OVER AUSTRALIA’S NEWS MEDIA LANDSCAPE Gideon Rozner, Director of Policy Evan Mulholland, Director of Communications Morgan Begg, Research Fellow Contents Introduction 1 Part one – Principles of press freedom 2 Freedom of speech and freedom of the press 2 ‘Media influence’ – A centuries’-old debate 3 The myth of ‘media accountability’ 4 Part two – The current news media debate 5 Media diversity has never been greater 5 ‘Misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’ – The new moral panic 7 Part three – The role of public broadcasting 10 The case for reform 10 ‘Crowding out’ rival media outlets 11 Part four – Barriers to press freedom in Australia 17 Defamation Law 17 Freedom of Information Laws 19 Suppression orders 21 Vilification laws 22 Role of press regulators and broadcasting codes 24 Introduction Recent calls for a so-called ‘Murdoch royal commission’ have revived the perennial discussion about Australia’s news media landscape. As usual, the latest incarnation of this debate has triggered a string of pronouncements about ‘diversity’, ‘accountability’ and ‘standards’ in the Australian media. And as usual, the implication is that these ‘problems’ require regulation, censorship and sundry other forms of state intervention. This report will: 1. Explain the importance of free speech in general and press freedom in particular 2. Respond to various claims in the current media debate 3. Address the role of public broadcasting in the news landscape and 4. Outline current barriers to press freedom in Australia. 1 Institute of Public Affairs www.ipa.org.au Part one – Principles of press freedom Freedom of speech and freedom of the press The freedom to think and speak is fundamental to the Australian way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Guardian Media Group
    Guardian Media Group response to the BBC Trust Fair Trading Review About Guardian Media Group Guardian Media Group (GMG) is one of the UK's leading commercial media organisations and a British-owned, independent, news media business. GMG’s core business is Guardian News & Media (GNM), publisher of theguardian.com and the Guardian and Observer newspapers. As well as being the UK’s largest quality news brand, the Guardian and The Observer have pioneered a highly distinctive, open approach to publishing on the web and has sought global audience growth as a critical priority. Rapid technological change and the financial challenges facing the newspaper sector more broadly triggered GMG to drive a significant evolution in its business strategy. In 2011 GMG revealed plans to become a digital first news organisation, placing a distinctive, open approach to digital journalism at the heart of its strategy at a time when many other news brands were putting up digital paywalls and charging premiums for their online content. This open approach has seen GMG produce high-quality journalism, funded through a combination of advertising, sales, events, and sponsorship. GMG is increasingly connecting with new audiences via social media and other third party platforms, opening up our content to reflect changes in consumer behaviour. Online news services operated by GNM now include: theguardian.com website (optimised for desktop, tablet and mobile); a free iOS and Android app for mobile and tablet; and, a paid-for daily iPad edition. This open approach to journalism has also seen GNM enjoy significant growth as theguardian.com has become one of the world’s leading quality English language newspaper websites in the world1 with over 120 million monthly unique browsers2.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Platforms and Australian News Media: Report
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Flew, Terry, Suwana, Fiona,& Tam, Lisa (2018) Digital platforms and Australian news media: Report. Digital Media Research Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Australia. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/118270/ c 2018 The Authors and Queensland University of Technology This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. DIGITAL PLATFORMS AND AUSTRALIAN NEWS MEDIA: REPORT APRIL 2018 By Professor Terry Flew, Dr. Fiona Suwana and Dr. Lisa Tam, Queensland University of Technology DIGITAL PLATFORMS AND AUSTRALIAN NEWS MEDIA: REPORT / 1 Authored by Professor Terry Flew Digital Media Research Centre, Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology Dr.
    [Show full text]