Arxiv:1802.04058V1 [Gr-Qc]

Home , Spin tensor

arXiv:1802.04058v1 [gr-qc] 12 Feb 2018 .al [email protected] Egypt e.mail: Cairo, Group, Relativity Egyptian Egypt Giza, University, Nile mtisa niiulcss n fisseilcassi Riemann-Ca is classes space special tetrad situat its the a of treat one considers take must cases: one individual enquiry, as above ometries Non- the find of to case order in In particles mentioned above the tries? of situation the bee is have What equations mag detailed motion, these spinning of include Such geometry. to [4]. Riemannin Dixon-Souriau Pa objects by by charged e approach followed with e.g. [1], an fields non-gravitational Mathisson is other by include there to started [3] century Dixon to last by order extended the Acco in in Relativity. gravitation particles, of done Theory test the were General mere of Orthodox the a presence to as the due property in objects viewing object than rotating practical a of problem The Introduction 1 eea oriaetasomto GT,tehlnmccoordin holonomic the (GCT), transformation coordinate general 1 o,teaiigqeto,i ae ntefollowing: the on based is question, arising the Now, oenSine n rsUiest,Gz,Egypt Giza, University, Arts and Sciences Modern , h pnigEutoso oinfrOjcsin Objects for Motion of Equations Spinning The nbt imninadnnReana geometries. non-Riemannian and pat Riemannian and both path t in between rise relation give g commutation may parameterized it Riemannian physics, as the of geometerization in of s equations concept new the Papapetrou This the admitting of simultaneously. geometry counterpart torsion non-Riemannian and of curvature class vanishing special a [AP], qain fsinn bet r bandi bouePara Absolute in obtained are objects spinning of Equations λ i µ stoidpnetvco ed,oemyb epnil for responsible be may one fields, vector independent two as AP-Geometry adE Kahil E. Magd uy2,2021 27, July Abstract 1 1 ecietesi tensor spin the describe o to qain sthe is equations of et eito equations deviation h o fnnReainge- non-Riemanian of ion dnl,svrlattempts several rdingly, oer.Applying, eometry. natraienon- alternative an ts aee yGreek by labeled ates, lls Geometry llelism etoantc Also, lectromagnetic. tngoer;which geometry; rtan goeterintrinsic their ignore lfil sessentially is field al rsne nyin only presented n eani geome- Remannain aeru[]and [2] papetrou ei moment netic indices and the Latin ones are used to express the Local Lorentz transformation [LLT], mainly to describe the internal properties of the object [5], labeled by Latin letters, the anholonomic coordinates. This type of work has led many authors [6-8], to relate this type of geometry with gauge theories of gravity [9]. In there are a tetrad space for gauge translation, and spin connection to represent gauge rotation. [10-12][..].

Also, another trend of viewing the Non-Riemaniann geometry, is called a Teleparallel geometry- A geometry with a tetrad building blocks, may represent a translational gauge with a vanishing curvature [13] , and treating the annholonomic coordinates as vector number. Such a tendency of neutralizing the role of annholnomic coordinates, to be a vector number, with an additional property. This may give rise to define that there are non-vanishing torsion curvatures simultaneously, due to within different types of absolute derivatives2. The arising notation of AP-geometry led Wanas et al (1995) to describe three different paths may act the role of geodesic in Riemanian geometry [17]. The striking features of 1 these paths, have a step 2 from one path into other . This gives an impression, that paths in this type of geometry are naturally quantized. Lately, Wanas(1998) obtained a parameterized absolute parallelism geometry [PAP] obtaining a spin-torsion interaction, together with defining non-vanishing curvature and torsion tensors simultaneously [18]. The existence of such an interaction has led Wanas et al to detect its presence in terms of revealing the discrepancy between theory and observation of thermal neutrons [19] and presenting a temporal model for SN1987A [20]. Accordingly, in the present work we are going to obtain the analogous of the Papa- petrou equation with precesession in the context of AP-geometry. This will enable us to examine, the effect of different absolute derivatives on the interaction with the torsion and spin tensors. The paper is organized as follows; section 2 displays the relationship between spin tensor and geodesic and geodesic deviation vectors in the Riemaniann geometry, section 3 is extending the previous relationship to become among paths and path deviation vectors with their corresponding spin tensors in AP-geometry. Section 4 deals with the Lagranagian formalism of the Papapetrou equation in AP-geometry, and finally, Section 5 displays the results obtained the previous sections , regarding some recommendations in our future work of on this approach.

2 Motion in Riemanian Geometry

2.1 Geodesic and Geodesic Deviations : The Bazanski Ap- proach Equations of geodesic and geodesic deviation equations Riemannian geometry are required to examine many problems of motion for diﬀerent test particles in gravitational ﬁelds. This led many authors to derive them by various methods, one of the most applicable

2For more details about the underlying geometry and its application in establishing a generalized ﬁeld theory see [14-16]

2 ones is the Bazanski approach [21] in which from one single Lagrangian one can obtain simultaneously equation of geodesic and geodesic deviations in the following way; DΨν L = g U µ (2.1) µν Ds µ where , gµν is the metric tensor, U , is a unit tangent vector of the path whose parameter is ν D s, and Ψ is the deviation vector associated to the path (s), Ds is the covariant derivative with respect to parameter s. Applying the Euler Lagrange equation , by taking the variation with respect to the deviation tensor: d ∂L ∂L − = 0 (2.2) ds ∂Ψ˙ µ ∂Ψµ to obtain the geodesic equation DU µ = 0 (2.3) Ds and taking the variation with respect the the unit vector U µ d ∂L ∂L − = 0 (2.4) ds ∂U µ ∂xµ to obtain the geodesic deviation equation D2Ψµ = Rµ U νU ρΨσ (2.5) Ds2 νρσ µ where Rνρσ is Riemann-Christoﬀel tensor.

2.2 On The Relation Between Spin Tensor and The Deviation Vector: The Riemanian Case Equations of spinning motion ,the case of P α = mU α can be related to geodesic if one follows the following transformation [22] DΨµ U¯ µ = U µ + β (2.6) Ds ¯ α ¯ α dxµ where U is a unit tangent vector with respect to the parameter ,such that U = ds¯ ,s ¯. By taking the covariant derivative on both sides one obtains: DU¯ α D DΨµ ds = (U µ + β ) (2.7) Ds¯ Ds Ds ds¯ From geodesic and geodesic deviation equations one gets DU α = 0 (2.8) Ds and D2Ψα = Rα U µU ν Ψσ (2.9) Ds2 µνσ

3 Substituting equations (2.8) and (2.9) in (2.)7 to get

DU¯ α ds =(βRα U µU ν Ψσ) (2.10) Ds¯ µνσ ds¯ s Let us assume the following taking β = m

Sµν = s(U αΨβ − U βΨα) (2.11)

Thus, we get DU¯ α 1 ds = (Rα U µU ν Ψσ) (2.12) Ds¯ 2m µνσ ds¯ i.e DU¯ α 1 = Rα SνσU¯ µ (2.13) Ds¯ 2m µνσ Which is the Papapetrou equation for short.

2.3 Lagrangian Formalism of Spinning Equations Another way to derive the Papapetrou equation for short is, by applying the action principle on the following equation [23]:

DΨ¯ ν 1 L = g U¯ µ + R SρσU ν Ψµ, (2.14) µν Ds¯ 2m µνρσ taking the variation with respect to the deviation tensor Ψ¯ α we obtain equation (2.13). Also, by taking the variation with respect to U¯ α after some manipulations, we get its corresponding spinning deviation equation

DΨ¯2 1 = Rα U¯ βU¯ γ Ψ¯ δ + (Rα SγσU β) Ψ¯ δ (2.15) D2s¯ βγδ 2m βγσ ;δ Thus, we can ﬁgure out the Euler Lagrange Equations on the Bazanski-like Lagragian give an identical equation to (2.13) and its corresponding deviation equations.

2.4 Spinning and Spinning Deviation Equations Without Pre- cession The Papapetrou equation of a spinning object with precession [2]is obtained by a modiﬁed Bazanski Lagrangian [23] :

DSαβ DΨβ 1 L = g (mU α + U ) + R SγδU βΨα αβ β Ds Ds 2 αβγδ to obtain equation of a spinning object by taking the variation with respect to the deviation vector Ψα D DSαβ 1 (mU α + U )= Rα SρνU µ (2.16) Ds β Ds 2 .µνρ

4 and its deviation equation can be obtained by taking the variation with respect to U α to become: D2Ψα DSνβ DSλβ DΨν = Rα U µ(mU ν + U )Ψρ + gασg (mU λ + U ) Ds2 .µνρ β Ds νλ β Ds ;σ Ds 1 DΨµ + (Rα Sνρ + Rα SνλU µΨρ + Rα SνλU µΨρ). (2.17) 2 .µνρ Ds µνλ .;ρ µνλ;ρ 2.5 Spinning and Spinning Deviation Equations with Precession It is well known that equation of spinning charged objects in the presence of gravitational ﬁeld have been studied extensively [23]. This led us to suggest its corresponding Lagrangian formalism , using a modiﬁed Bazanski Lagrangian [25], for a spinning and precessing object and their corresponding deviation equation in Riemanian geometry in the following way

DΨβ DΨαβ L = g P α + S + F Ψα + M Ψαβ (2.18) αβ Ds αβ Ds α αβ where DSαβ P α = mU α + U . (2.19) β DS Taking the variation with respect to Ψµ and Ψµν simultaneously we obtain DP µ = F µ, (2.20) DS and DSµν = M µν , (2.21) DS where P µ is the momentum vector, 1 F µ = Rµ SρδU ν, 2 νρδ

α D and Rβρσ is the Riemann curvature, Ds is the covariant derivative with respect to a parameter S,Sαβ is the spin tensor,

M µν = P µU ν − P νU µ (2.22)

, regarding U µ is the unit tangent vector to the geodesic. Using the following identity on both equations (2.20) and (2.21)

µ µ µ β A;νρ − A;ρν = RβνρA , (2.23) where Aµ is an arbitrary vector, and multiplying both sides with arbitrary vectors, U ρΨν as well as using the following condition [26]

α ρ α ρ U;ρΨ =Ψ;ρU , (2.24)

5 and Ψα is its deviation vector associated to the unit vector tangent U α. Also in a similar way: αβ ρ αβ ρ S;ρ Ψ = Φ;ρ U (2.25) One obtains the corresponding deviation equations [27] D2Ψµ = Rµ P νU ρΨσ + F µΨρ, (2.26) DS2 νρσ ;ρ and D2Ψµν = Sρ[µRν] U σΨǫ + M µν Ψρ (2.27) DS2 ρσǫ ;ρ 3 Motion in AP-Geometry

A brief introduction of AP-Space The structure of this space is defined completely by a set of n-contravariant vector fields µ λ where i =1, 2, 3, ..., n) denotes the vector number, and µ(= 1, 2, 3, ..., n) denotes λµ of i i the vectors λµ, in the determinant || λµ||, is defined such that3 i i µ λ λµ = δij, i j

µ µ λ λν = δν . i i Using these vectors, the following second order symmetric tensors are deﬁned:

def gµν = λµ λν, i i

def gµν = λµ λν. i i one can define Christoffel symbols and covariant derivatives using this symbol, in the usual manner. The following third order tensor, the contortion tensor, can be defined as,

α def α γ.µν = λ λµ;ν , i i α which is non-symmetric in its last two indices µ, ν. It can be shown that γ.µν is skew- symmetric in its ﬁrst two indices. The AP-Condition

ν λ µ =0 i |+ µ where | + is the absolute +ve derivative, such that it deﬁnes Γα − µν a non symmetric aﬃne connection, in which

α α Γµν = λ λµ,ν. i i 3for more detail see [13-16]

6 (i)Paths and Path Deviation Equations Subject to (+)ve Deriva- tive Paths and Path deviations equations are the counterpart of geodesic and geodesic deviation in AP-geometry. Accordingly, we have diﬀerent trajectories based on the type of the absolute derivative [17]. From this perspective, it has been found out that the Bazanski Lagrangian may be a good candidate to express these trajectories. ∇Φν L = g V µ (3.28) µν ∇S+ where ∇Φ dΦα = +Γα ΦµV ν. ∇S+ dS+ µν Thus,taking the variation with respect to ξµ and implementing the AP-condition to ﬁnd that

g µ σ ≡ 0 (3.29) +ν+|σ one ﬁnds out the following path equation ∇V µ =0. (3.30) ∇S+ Also, its associated deviations can be derived if one applies the following relation

µ µ µ σ σ µ A ν ρ − A ρ ν = MσνρA +ΛνρA σ , (3.31) |++ |++ |+ provided with the following condition:

α ρ α ρ U ρ Φ = Φ ρ U , (3.32) |+ |+ with taking into consideration, the vanishing curvature tensor

µ Mσνρ ≡ 0, (3.33) to be substituted in (3.30) to obtain the corresponding deviation equation

2 α ∇ Φ ρ µ ν α =Λµν V Φ V ρ . (3.34) ∇2+ |+

(ii)Paths and Path Deviation Equations subject to (0)ve Deriva- tive Due to (0)ve derivative one can derive its associated path and path deviation equations using the following Lagrangian [17]:

ˆ ν µ ∇η L = gµνW , (3.35) ∇ˆ S0

7 where ˆ α α ∇η dη α µ ν = +Γ µν η W . ∇ˆ S0 dS0 ( ) Thus, taking the variation with respect to ηµ;provided that

gµν =Λ(µν)σ, (3.36) 00|σ to obtain its corresponding path equation: ∇W µ 1 = Λ µ W νW ρ. (3.37) ∇S0 2 (νρ). Using the following relation

µ µ µ σ σ µ A νρ − A ρν = LσνρA +ΛνρA σ, (3.38) |00 |00 |0 and the condition below µ ρ µ ρ W ρ η = η ρ W , (3.39) (0) (0) to be substituted in (3.37), provided that its associated curvature,

µ Lσνρ =06 , (3.40) is non vanishing, to obtain the corresponding deviation equation

ˆ 2 α ∇ ζ 1 . . α µ ν ρ α β ρ σ ρ µ ν α = (Λµν W W ) ρζ + LβρσW W ζ +ΛµνW η ζ ρ (3.41) ∇ˆ S2(0) 2 |0 |0

(iii)Paths and Path Deviation Equations Subject to (-)ve Deriva- tive Following the same approach as explained the previous items(i) and (ii), one may derive the paths and path deviations equations associated to -ve derivative, by introducing the following Lagrangian [17]: ˜ ν µ ∇ζ L = gµνJ (3.42) ∇˜ S− such that ∇˜ ζν dζν = + Γ˜ν ζµJ σ. ∇˜ S− dS− µσ Accordingly, taking the variation with respect to ηµ to derive its corresponding path equation, and provided that [16]

g µ ν = 2Λ(µν)σ (3.43) −−|σ to get ∇˜ J µ =Λ . µ J αJ β. (3.44) ∇˜ S− (αβ)

8 Also, in order to derive its corresponding path deviation equation, one must take into account the following relation: µ µ µ σ σ µ A ν ρ − A ρ ν = NσνρA +ΛνρA σ (3.45) |−− |−− |− together with, the condition µ ρ µ ρ J ρ ζ = ζ ρ J , (3.46) |(−) |(−) to be substituted in (3.44), provided that its associated curvature, µ Nσνρ =06 , (3.47) is non vanishing curvature. Thus we derive the corresponding path deviation equation ˜ 2 α ∇ η α β ρ σ ρ µ ν α = NβρσJ J η +ΛµνJ η η ρ (3.48) ∇˜ S2− |− 3.1 On the Relation Between Spin Tensor and The Deviation Vector: The AP-geometry In this part, we are going to extend the relationship obtained in (2.2) to derive the corresponding spin equations and their corresponding spin deviation equations.

+ve Derivative α α Equations of spinning motion ,the case of P+ = mV can be related to geodesic if one follows the following transformation DΦµ V¯ µ = V µ + β (3.49) Ds+ ¯ α ¯ α dxµ where V is a unit tangent vector with respect to the parameter ,such that V = ds¯+ ,s ¯. By taking the covariant derivative on both sides one obtains: ∇V¯ α ∇ ∇Φµ ds = (V µ + β ) . (3.50) ∇s¯+ ∇s+ ∇s+ ds¯ Substituting equations (3.30) and (3.34) in (3.50) to get ¯ α ∇V ρ ν σ ds =(βΛ V ρ V Φ ) (3.51) ∇s¯+ νσ µ|+ ds¯ s let us assume the following Taking β = m S¯µν = s(V αΦβ − V βΦα) (3.52) Thus, we get ¯ α ∇V 1 ρ νσ ds = (Λ V ρ S¯ ) (3.53) ∇s¯+ 2m νσ µ|+ ds¯ i.e ¯ α ∇V 1 ρ νσ = Λ V¯ ρ S¯ (3.54) ∇s¯+ 2m νσ µ|+ Which is the version the Papapetrou equation for +ve derivative, for short.

9 0-Derivative α α Equations of spinning motion ,the case of P(0) = mW can be related to geodesic if one follows the following transformation

∇¯ ηµ W¯ µ = W µ + β (3.55) ∇¯ s¯(0) ¯ α ¯ α dxµ where W is a unit tangent vector with respect to the parameter ,such that W = ds¯(0) , s¯. By taking the covariant derivative on both sides one obtains:

∇¯ W¯ α ∇ ∇ηµ ds = (W µ + β ) . (3.56) ∇¯ s¯(0) ∇s+ ∇s(0) ds¯ Substituting equations (3.37) and (3.41) in (3.56) to get

¯ α ∇W 1 . .α µ ν α β γ δ ρ ν σ ds =( Λµν W W + β[LβγδW W η +ΛνσW ρ W η ]) . (3.57) ∇s¯(0) 2 µ|(0) ds¯

s Now, let us assume that β = m , and

S¯µν = s(V αηβ − W βηα). (3.58)

Thus, we get

¯ W¯ α ds(0) ∇ 1 . .α µ ν 1 α µ ρ ¯νσ =( Λµν W W + [LµνσW +ΛνσW ρ ])S ( ) (3.59) ∇s¯(0) 2 2m µ|(0) ds¯(0) i.e W¯ α ∇ 1 . .α µ ¯ ν 1 α ¯ µ ρ ¯ ¯νσ = Λµν W W + (LµνσW +ΛνσW ρ )S . (3.60) ∇s¯(0) 2 2m µ|(0) If we regard ds(0) =1, ds¯(0) then, equation (3.64) becomes

¯ α ∇W 1 . .α ¯ µ ¯ ν 1 α ¯ µ ρ ¯ ¯νσ = Λµν W W + (LµνσW +ΛνσW ρ )S (3.61) ∇s¯(0) 2 2m µ|(0) Which is the version the Papapetrou equation for (0)ve derivative, for short.

-ve Derivative

α α Equations of spinning motion ,the case of P− = mJ can be related to geodesic if one follows the following transformation

∇˜ ζµ J¯µ = J µ + β (3.62) ∇˜ s¯−

10 ¯α ¯α dxµ where J is a unit tangent vector with respect to the parameter ,such that J = ds¯− ,s ¯. By taking the covariant derivative on both sides one obtains:

∇¯ J¯α ∇˜ ∇ζµ ds = (J µ + β ) . (3.63) ∇¯ s˜(−) ∇s− ∇˜ s− ds¯− Substituting equations (3.44) and (3.48) in (3.63) to get

˜ ¯α − ∇J . .α µ ν α β γ δ ρ ν σ ds = (Λ J J + β[N J J ζ +Λ J ρ J ζ ]) (3.64) ∇˜ s˜− µν βγδ νσ µ|− ds¯− s let us assume the following Taking β = m ,and

S˜µν = s(J αζβ − J βζα). (3.65)

Thus, we get

˜ ¯α (−) ∇J . .α µ ν 1 α µ ρ νσ ds = (Λ J J + [N J +Λ J ρ ])S˜ ( ) (3.66) ∇˜ s¯− µν 2m µνσ νσ µ|− ds¯(−) i.e ˜ ¯α ∇J . .α µ ν 1 α µ ρ νσ =Λ J J˜ + (N J¯ +Λ J¯ ρ )S˜ (3.67) ∇˜ s¯− µν 2m µνσ νσ µ|− If we regard ds(−) =1, ds˜(−) then, equation (3.73) becomes

˜ ¯α ∇J . .α µ ν 1 α µ ρ νσ =Λ J¯ J¯ + (N J¯ +Λ J¯ ρ )S˜ (3.68) ∇˜ s¯− (µν) 2m µνσ νσ µ|− Which is the version the Papapetrou equation for -ve derivative, for short.

4 Spinning and Spinning Deviation Equations in AP- geometry: Lagrangian Formalism

From the previous results, we can check the reliability of the corresponding Bazanski equation to become in the following way.

4.1 Spinning and Spinning Deviation equations subject to (+)ve derivative i the case of P+ = mV ¯ µ ¯ µν µ ∇Φ ∇Φ 1 ρ νσ µ L = gµνV + S¯µν + [Λ V ρ ]S¯ Φ . (4.69) ∇¯ S+ ∇¯ S+ 2m νσ µ|+

11 Taking the variation with respect to Φα and Φαβ we obtain V α ∇ 1 ¯δν α αρ ρ ¯νσ = Λρδν S V σ + g ΛνσV ρ S , (4.70) ∇S+ 2m + µ|+ and

∇˜ Sαβ = 0 (4.71) ∇˜ S2− Using the commutation relation (3.31) , conditions (3.32) and

µν ρ µν ρ S¯ ρ Φ = Φ ρ V , (4.72) |+ |+ to be substituted in (4.70) and (4.71) in order to derive its corresponding set of deviation equations 2 α ∇ Φ ρ µ ν α =ΛµνV V Φ ρ , (4.73) ∇˜ S2(+) + and 2 αβ ∇ Φ ρ µ ν ¯αβ =Λµν V Φ S ρ . (4.74) ∇ˆ S2+ |+

(ii) the case P+ =6 mV Let us suggest the following Lagrangian: µ µν µ ∇Φ ¯ ∇Φ 1 ρ ¯δρ µ ν α β β α µν L = gµνP+ + Sµν + gµνΛδρS V ρ Φ + gαµgβν[P+V − P+V ]Φ , (4.75) ∇S+ ∇S+ 2m + where V ∇˜ S¯µν P µ = mV µ + ν . + ∇S(+) Taking the variation with respect to ζα and ζαβ we obtain P α ∇ + 1 ρ ¯δν α ρ δ δ ρ µν = ΛδνS V ρ + gµρgνδ[P+V − P+V ]Φ , (4.76) S+ 2m + and ∇2S¯αβ = [P αV β − P βV α]. (4.77) ∇¯ S2 + + Using the commutation relation (3.31) , the conditions (3.32) and (3.32) to be substituted in (4.70)and (4.71)and (4.72) in order to derive its corresponding set of deviation equations ˜ 2 α ∇ Φ 1 ρ ˆδσ α δ =( ΛδσS V σ ) δ Φ (4.78) ∇˜ S2− 2m + |+ and 2 αβ ∇ ζ ρ µ ν ˜αβ α β β α δ =ΛµνV Φ S ρ + [P+V − P+V ] δ Φ . (4.79) ∇˜ S2+ + |+ From the above results of spinning equations and their corresponding deviation ones, we reach to regard them as the equivalent set of equations of spinning objects in the presence of Tele-parallel gravity [13].

12 4.2 Spinning and Spinning Deviation equations subject to (0)ve derivative ii The case of P(0) = mW ˆ µ ˆ µν µ ∇η ˆ ∇η 1 µ ν ρδ ρ ˆνσ µ L = gµν W + Sµν + Lµνρδη W S +ΛνσW ρ S η (4.80) ∇ˆ S(0) ∇ˆ S(0) 2m µ|.(0) Taking the variation with respect to ηα and ηαβ, we obtain

ˆ α ∇W 1 . . α µ ν 1 α ν ρσ αµ ρ ˆνσ = Λ(µν) W W + LνρσW S + g ΛνσW ρ S (4.81) ∇ˆ So 2 2m µ|(0) and

∇ˆ 2Sˆαβ 1 = Λ .. [αSβ]µW ν. (4.82) ∇ˆ S2(0) 2 (µν) Using the commutation relation (3.38) and conditions (3.39) and

µν ρ µν ρ Sˆ ρ η = η ρ W (4.83) |(0) |(0) to be substituted in (4.80) and (4.81) in order to derive its corresponding set of deviation equations

ˆ 2 α ∇ η α µ ν ρ ρ µ ν α 1 . . α µ ν 1 α ν ρσ σ = LµνρW W η +ΛµνW ξ η ρ + (Λµν W W + LνρσW S ) ση , (4.84) ∇ˆ S2(0) (0) 2 2m |0 and ˆ 2 αβ ∇ η µ[β α] ν ρ ρ µ ν αβ = S ρLµνρW η +ΛµνW η S ρ . (4.85) ∇ˆ S2(0) |0

(ii) the case P(0) =6 mW Let us suggest the following Lagrangian:

ˆ ηµ ˆ ηµν µ ∇ ˆ ∇ 1 µ ν ˆρδ 1 ρ ˆδρ µ ν ρ δ δ ρ µν L = gµνP(0) +Sµν + Lµνρδη W S + gµν ΛδρS W ρ η +gµρgνδ[P(0)W −P0 W ]η ∇ˆ S(0) ∇ˆ S(0) 2m 2m (0) (4.86) W DSµν µ µ ν (0) where P(0) = mW + DS(0) .

Taking the variation with respect to ηα and ηαβ we obtain

ˆ α ∇P(0) 1 ..α µ ν 1 α ν ρσ 1 ρ δν α = Λ P W + L W Sˆ + Λ Sˆ W ρ (4.87) Sˆ(0) 2 µν (0) 2m νρσ 2m δν |o and ˆ 2 ˆαβ ∇ S 1 ..[α µβ] ν = Λµν S W (4.88) ∇ˆ S2(0) 2

13 Using the commutation relation (3.38) , conditions (3.39) and (4.82) to be substituted in (4.82) and (4.83) in order to derive its corresponding set of deviation equations

ˆ 2 α ∇ η α µ ν ρ ρ µ ν α 1 ..α µ ν 1 α ν ˆρσ 1 ρ ˆδσ α δ = LµνρP(0)W η +ΛµνP(0)η η ρ + (Λµν P(0)W + LνρσW S + ΛδσS W σ ) δ η , ∇ˆ S2(0) (0) 2 2m 2m (0) (0) (4.89) and ˜ 2ζαβ ∇ ˜µ[β α] ν ρ ρ µ ν ˆαβ ..[α µβ] δ α β β α δ = S ρNµνρJ J +Λµν W η Sρ + (Λµν S J δ ζ + [P(0)W − P(0)W ] δ η ∇˜ S2− o ν|− |(0) (4.90)

4.3 Spinning and Spinning Deviation Equations subject to (-)ve Derivative

(i) the case of P− = mJ ˜ µ ˜ µν µ ∇ζ ∇ζ 1 µ ν ρδ ρ νσ µ L = gµνJ + S˜µν + Nµνρδζ J S +Λ J ρ Sˆ ζ (4.91) ∇˜ S− ∇˜ S− 2m νσ µ|− by taking the variation with respect to ζα and ζαβ we obtain

˜ J α ∇ ..α µ ν 1 α ν ρσ 1 δν α αρ ρ ˜νσ =Λµν J J + NνρσJ S + Λρδν S J σ + g ΛνσJ ρ S (4.92) ∇˜ S− 2m 2m − µ|− and

∇˜ Sαβ =Λ . [αSβ]µJ ν (4.93) ∇˜ S2− (µν) Using the commutation relation (3.44) , conditions (3.48) and

µν ρ µν ρ S˜ ρ ζ = ζ ρ J (4.94) |− |− to be substituted in (4.91)and (4.92) in order to derive its corresponding set of deviation equations

˜ 2ζα ∇ α µ ν ρ ρ µ ν α . . α µ ν 1 α ν ˜ρσ σ = NµνρJ J ζ +ΛµνJ J η ρ + (Λµν J W + NνρσJ S ) σ ζ (4.95) ∇˜ S2(−) − 2m |− and ˜ 2ζαβ ∇ µ[β α] ν ρ ρ µ ν ˜αβ = S ρΛνρJ ζ +Λµν J ζ S ρ . (4.96) ∇ˆ S2(−) |−

14 (ii) the case P− =6 mJ Let us suggest the following Lagrangian:

˜ µ ˜ µν µ ∇ζ ˜ ∇ζ 1 µ ν ˜ρδ 1 ρ ˜δρ µ ν ρ δ δ ρ µν L = gµνP− +Sµν + Nµνρδζ J S + gµν ΛδρS J ρ ζ +gµρgνδ[P−J −P−J ]ζ ∇˜ S− ∇˜ S− 2m 2m − (4.97) where J ∇˜ S˜µν P µ = mW µ + ν (0) DS(0) by taking the variation with respect to ζα and ζαβ we obtain

˜ P α ∇ − 1 . . α µ ν 1 α ν ˜ρσ 1 ρ ˜δν α = Λµν P−J + NνρσJ S + ΛδνS J ρ (4.98) S˜− 2 2m 2m − and ˜ 2 ˜αβ ∇ S ..[α µβ] ν =Λµν S J (4.99) ∇ˆ S2− Using commutation relation (3.44) and the conditions (3.48) and (4.93) to be substituted in (4.97) and (4.98) in order to derive its corresponding set of deviation equations

˜ 2 α ∇ ζ α µ ν ρ ρ µ ν α . . α µ ν 1 α ν ˜ρσ 1 ρ ˆδσ α δ = NµνρP−J ζ +ΛµνP−ζ ζρ + (Λµν P−J + LνρσJ S + ΛδσS J σ ) δ ζ ∇˜ S2− o 2m 2m − |− (4.100) and ˜ 2ζαβ ∇ ˜µ[β α] ν ρ ρ µ ν ˜αβ ..[α ˜µβ] δ α β β α δ = S ρNµνρJ J +ΛµνJ ζ S ρ +(Λµν S J δ ζ +[P−J −P−J ] δ ζ . (4.101) ∇˜ S2− − ν|− − 5 Discussion and Concluding Remarks

The present work is related to extending the concept of geometerization of physics to explain spinning objects in a gravitational field. It has been developed the modified Bazanski Lagrangian in general relativity for spinning objects to be expressed in AP- geometry. Due to the wealth of geometric quantities, one must regard that the existence of spin tensors associated for each path is defined by a specific type of absolute derivative. Also, we have emphasized the relationship between geodesic and geodesic deviation with spinning tensors, to be viable for any type of geometries, by testing its reliability in both Riemannian and AP-geometry. Moreover, the spin tensor has been defined geometrically as a commutation relation between formula between geodesic and geodesic deviation in Riemannian geometry and their counterparts in AP-geometry. Accordingly, we have obtained three different spinning equations different from its counterpart in Riemannian geometry. One of them, can be used to describe the spinning equations and their deviation in Tele-parallel gravity, i.e. these sets of spinning equations are representing the Papapetrou equation of Hayshi-Shirifugi New General Relativity [13], while the other two paths may describe, hypnotically, a set of spinning particles subject to a class of non vanishing curvature and torsion simultaneously. This may present require

15 an eﬃcient ﬁeld theory feasible to give a physical interpretation of Sˆµν and S˜µν which still an open question.

Yet, this study has also clariﬁed the viability interaction between torsion tensor and spin deviation equations, as mentioned previously in case of Gauge theories of gravity [24] Nevertheless, these sets of spinning equations can also be applied in PAP-geometry, to give new results. Owing to revisit, the bi-metric theories of gravity using the tetrad formalism, one may ﬁnd out some promising results able to reveal the mystery of several anomalies such as dark matter and dark energy in our nature, which will be studied in our future work.

References

[1] M. Mathisson, Acta Phys. Polon 6, 163 (1937). [2] A.Papapetrou , Proceedings of Royal Society London A 209 , 248(1951). [3] W. G. Dixon Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 314, 499 (1970). [4] F. Cianfrani, I. Milillo and G. Montani Phys, Lett. A, 366,7 ; gr-qc/0701157 (2007). [5]Utyiama, R.(1956) Phys Rev. 101 1597 [6]Kibble, T.W. (1960) J. Math Phys., 2, 212 [7]Hehl, von der Heyde, P. Kerlik, G.D. and Nester, J.M. (1976) Rev Mod Phys 48, 393- 416 [8] F.W. Hehl , Proceedings of the 6th Course of the International School of Cosmology and Gravitation on ”Spin, Torsion and Supergravity” eds. P.G. Bergamann and V. de Sabatta , held at Erice ,1 (1979). [9]H.I. Acros, and J.G. Pereira, International Journal of Modern Physics D 13, 2193 (2004) [10] S. Hojman, Physical Rev. D 18, 2741 (1978). ([11])P.H. Yasskin, and W.R. Stoeger, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2081(1980). [12]Hammond, R. (2002) Rep. Prog. Phys, 65, 599-449 [13]K. Hayashi, and T. Shirifuji , Phys. Rev. D, 19, 3524 (1979). [14] Mikhail, F.I. and Wanas, M.I. (1977) Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 356, 471. [15] Wanas, M.I. (2001) Stud. Cercet. S¸tiint¸. Ser. Mat. Univ. Bac˘au 10, 297; gr- qc/0209050 [16] Wanas, M.I. (2000) Turk. J. Phys., 24, 473 ; gr-qc/0010099. [17] Wanas, M.I., Melek, M. and Kahil, M.E.(1995) Astrophys. Space Sci.,228, 273. ; gr-qc/0207113. [18] Wanas, M.I.(1998) Astrophys. Space Sci., 258, 237 ;vgr-qc/9904019.

[19] Wanas, M.I., Melek, M. and Kahil, M.E. (2000) Grav. Cosmol., 6 , 319.

[20] Wanas, M.I., Melek, M. and Kahil, M.E. (2002) Proc. MG IX, part B, p.1100, Eds. V.G. Gurzadyan et al. (World Scientiﬁc Pub.); gr-qc/0306086.

[21] Bazanski, S.I. (1989) J. Math. Phys., 30, 1018.

16 [22] D. Bini and A Geralico, Phys. Rev D 84,104012; arXiv: 1408.4952 (2011) [23] Kahil, M.E. (2006) , J. Math. Physics 47,052501. [24] Magd E. Kahil, Odessa Astronomical Publications, vol 28/2, 126. (2015) [25] Magd E. Kahil , Gravi. Cosmol. 24, 83 (2018) [26] M. Mohseni , Gen. Rel. Grav., 42, 2477 (2010). [27]M. Roshan, Phys.Rev. D87,044005 ; arXiv 1210.3136 (2013)