DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1903.03835V1 [Gr-Qc] 9 Mar 2019 [15–17] Thus Modifying Significantly the Orbit of 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1903.03835V1 [Gr-Qc] 9 Mar 2019 [15–17] Thus Modifying Significantly the Orbit of 3 Spinning particle orbits around a black hole in an expanding background I. Antoniou,1, ∗ D. Papadopoulos,2, y and L. Perivolaropoulos1, z 1Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, GR-45110, Ioannina, Greece 2Department of Physics, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki,54124, Greece (Dated: March 12, 2019) We investigate analytically and numerically the orbits of spinning particles around black holes in the post Newtonian limit and in the presence of cosmic expansion. We show that orbits that are circular in the absence of spin, get deformed when the orbiting particle has spin. We show that the origin of this deformation is twofold: a. the background expansion rate which induces an attractive (repulsive) interaction due to the cosmic background fluid when the expansion is decelerating (accelerating) and b. a spin-orbit interaction which can be attractive or repulsive depending on the relative orientation between spin and orbital angular momentum and on the expansion rate. PACS numbers: 04.20.Cv, 97.60.Lf, 98.62.Dm I. INTRODUCTION bound systems in the presence of phantom dark energy with equation of state parameter w < −1 Even though most astrophysical bodies have [2{4]. In the absence of expansion but in the spins and evolve in an expanding cosmological presence of spin for the test particles it has been background, their motion is described well by ig- shown that spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions noring the cosmic expansion and under the non- in a Kerr spacetime can lead to deformations of spinning test particle approximation for large dis- circular orbits for large spin values [14]. In view tances from a central massive body and for rela- of these facts, the following interesting questions tively low spin values [1]. These approximations emerge however become less accurate for large values of 1. Are there circular orbit deformations for the spin and/or when the mass of the cosmic fluid spinning test particles embedded in the post inside the particle orbit becomes comparable to Newtonian limit of McVittie background the mass of the central massive object. For such (Schwarzschild metric embedded in an ex- systems new types of interactions appear which panding background)? Such deformations are proportional to the time derivatives of the cos- could be anticipated due to the coupling mic scale factor and the spin of the orbiting par- of the particle spin with its orbital angu- ticle. For example, phantom dark energy models lar momentum. can lead to dissociation of all bound systems in the context of a Big-Rip future singularity [2{5]. 2. What is the nature of such deformation and Also, the spin-curvature interaction [6] can mod- how do the corresponding deformations de- ify the motion of the test particles in black hole pend on the orientation of the spin with re- spacetimes [7{11] due to spin-spin or spin-orbit spect to the angular momentum? couplings [12{14], or make the motion chaotic arXiv:1903.03835v1 [gr-qc] 9 Mar 2019 [15{17] thus modifying significantly the orbit of 3. How do these deformations depend on the the test body leading to the emission of charac- nature of the background expansion? teristic forms of gravitational waves [18{21]. Such interactions have been investigated previ- These questions are addressed in the present anal- ously for nonspinning test particles in an expand- ysis. ing background around a massive body (McVittie The structure of this paper is the following: In background [22]) and it was shown that acceler- the next section we briefly review the Mathisson- ating cosmic expansion can lead to dissociation of Papapetrou (MP) equations [23] and the com- mon supplementary conditions, we introduce the McVittie background corresponding to a black hole embedded in an expanding background and ∗ [email protected] its post Newtonian limit. In section III we discuss y [email protected] the conserved quantities of a spinning test parti- z [email protected] cle in a given spherically symmetric metric in an 2 expanded background, we consider the post New- interaction between the curvature of the space- tonian limit of McVittie metric and construct the time and the spin of the particle. Due to the geodesic equations of a spinning particle using the coupling between curvature and spin, the four- Mathisson-Papapetrou equations. We also solve momentum is not always parallel to the υµ. This these equations numerically and identify the de- may be seen by multiplying Eq. (2.3) with υν . formation of orbits due to the presence of test Then, leads to particle spin. We identify the dependence of this µν deformation on the relative orientation between µ µ DS p = mυ − υν (2.4) spin and orbital angular momentum of the spin- dτ ning test particle. Finally, in section IV we sum- where m = −pµυ is the rest mass of the particle marize, discuss the implications of our results and µ with respect to υ . identify possible future extensions of our analysis. µ Since τ is the proper time, the condition µ υµυ = −1 applies. The measure of the four- II. THE EQUATIONS OF MOTION OF A momentum SPINNING PARTICLE. THE MP µ 2 EQUATIONS. pµp = −µ (2.5) provides the `total' or ‘effective' [8] rest mass µ Consider a massive spinning test particle, in (pµ = µuµ) with respect to pµ where uµ is the `dy- MP's model [23, 24]. The equations of motion of namical four-velocity'. and is equal to m, only if a spinning particle originally derived from Papa- υµ coincides with the four-velocity uµ (uµ = υµ). petrou (1951) and later on reformulated by Dixon In the linear approximation of the spin pµ and [25, 26] can be extracted through the correspond- υµ are parallel. Generally, since uµ 6= υµ which ing Hamiltonian [27, 28] or through the extrem- DSµν means that dτ 6= 0 (see Eq. (2.4)) a spin- ization of the corresponding action [29], whose ning particle does not follow the geodesics of the variation is [30] spacetime (the r.h.s. of Eq. (2.2) is non zero, 1 since Sµν 6= 0). Therefore its motion is general- δL = −pµδυ − Sµν δΩ (2.1) µ 2 µν ized on a world line rather than geodesics. In the context of the MP equations the multi- µ dxµ where υ = dτ is the four-velocity of the test pole moments of the particle higher than a spin particle tangent to the orbit xµ = xµ(τ), τ is dipole are ignored [34]. This is the spin-dipole ap- the proper time across the worldline xµ(τ), pµ is proximation, because the particle is described as its four-momentum and Sµν are the components a mass monopole and spin dipole [35]. The equa- of the antisymmetric spin tensor. Also, Ωµν = tions in quadratic order of spin have also been IJ DeνJ IJ derived [36]. The MP equations can also get gen- η eµI dτ is an antisymmetric tensor, η = µ ν µ eI eJ gµν and eI is a tetrad attached to each point eralized in order to describe a test spinning par- of the worldline. ticle in Modified theories of Gravity [37]. The MP equations are of the form [30{33]: The MP equations (2.2) and (2.3) have been discussed by many authors and solutions have Dpµ dpµ 1 ≡ + Γµ υλpν = − Rµ Sλρυν (2.2) been presented. These solutions refer mainly dτ dτ λν 2 νλρ to Schwarzschild background spacetime [21, 38{ 44], to Kerr spacetime [21, 45{52], to de Sitter DSµν dSµν spacetime [53{56] and to FRW spacetime [57] ≡ + Γµ υλSρν + Γν υλSµρ dτ dτ λρ λρ (2.3) for chargeless or charged test spinning particles = pµυν − pν υµ [58, 59]. The evolution of spinning particles in spacetimes with torsion has also been investi- The dynamical equations imply, spin-orbit cou- gated [60, 61]. pling, i.e., spin couples to the velocity of the Eqs. (2.2) and (2.3) are the equations of mo- orbiting spinning particle, thus deforming the tion for a spinning body which reduce to the fa- geodesic. Therefore the spin force deforms the miliar geodesic equations when the spin tensor geodesic. Sµν vanishes. However, they do not form a com- The spin tensor keeps track of the intrinsic an- plete set of equations and we need further equa- gular momentum associated with a spinning par- tions to close the system [62]. The problem of ticle. The term in the r.h.s. of Eq. (2.2) shows an the unclosed set of equations in (2.2) and (2.3) 3 can be physically understood by the requirement which defines the centre of mass of the particle in that the particle must have a finite size which the rest frame of the central gravitating body. does not make the choice of the reference world- The McVittie metric describes a expanding line uniquely defined 1. The additional conditions cosmological background with strong gravity, used are the spin supplementary conditions (SSC) such as a spacetime near a black hole or a neutron [63]. When we choose a SSC, we define the evolu- star. In a (t; r; θ; φ) coordinate system McVittie tion of the test body in a unique worldline xµ(τ) [73] found a solution given by the equation (see and we fix the center of mass (corresponds to the eq. (29) of ref. [73] with G = c = 1) centre where the mass dipole vanishes), which is m(t) m(t) usually called centroid. The centroid is a single ds2 = −(1 − )2(1 + )−2dt2 + reference point inside the body, with respect to 2r 2r m(t) which the spin is measured [64].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROTATION: a Review of Useful Theorems Involving Proper Orthogonal Matrices Referenced to Three- Dimensional Physical Space
    Unlimited Release Printed May 9, 2002 ROTATION: A review of useful theorems involving proper orthogonal matrices referenced to three- dimensional physical space. Rebecca M. Brannon† and coauthors to be determined †Computational Physics and Mechanics T Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-0820 Abstract Useful and/or little-known theorems involving33× proper orthogonal matrices are reviewed. Orthogonal matrices appear in the transformation of tensor compo- nents from one orthogonal basis to another. The distinction between an orthogonal direction cosine matrix and a rotation operation is discussed. Among the theorems and techniques presented are (1) various ways to characterize a rotation including proper orthogonal tensors, dyadics, Euler angles, axis/angle representations, series expansions, and quaternions; (2) the Euler-Rodrigues formula for converting axis and angle to a rotation tensor; (3) the distinction between rotations and reflections, along with implications for “handedness” of coordinate systems; (4) non-commu- tivity of sequential rotations, (5) eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a rotation; (6) the polar decomposition theorem for expressing a general deformation as a se- quence of shape and volume changes in combination with pure rotations; (7) mix- ing rotations in Eulerian hydrocodes or interpolating rotations in discrete field approximations; (8) Rates of rotation and the difference between spin and vortici- ty, (9) Random rotations for simulating crystal distributions; (10) The principle of material frame indifference (PMFI); and (11) a tensor-analysis presentation of classical rigid body mechanics, including direct notation expressions for momen- tum and energy and the extremely compact direct notation formulation of Euler’s equations (i.e., Newton’s law for rigid bodies).
    [Show full text]
  • Spin in Relativistic Quantum Theory∗
    Spin in relativistic quantum theory∗ W. N. Polyzou, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 W. Gl¨ockle, Institut f¨urtheoretische Physik II, Ruhr-Universit¨at Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany H. Wita la M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, PL-30059 Krak´ow,Poland today Abstract We discuss the role of spin in Poincar´einvariant formulations of quan- tum mechanics. 1 Introduction In this paper we discuss the role of spin in relativistic few-body models. The new feature with spin in relativistic quantum mechanics is that sequences of rotationless Lorentz transformations that map rest frames to rest frames can generate rotations. To get a well-defined spin observable one needs to define it in one preferred frame and then use specific Lorentz transformations to relate the spin in the preferred frame to any other frame. Different choices of the preferred frame and the specific Lorentz transformations lead to an infinite number of possible observables that have all of the properties of a spin. This paper provides a general discussion of the relation between the spin of a system and the spin of its elementary constituents in relativistic few-body systems. In section 2 we discuss the Poincar´egroup, which is the group relating inertial frames in special relativity. Unitary representations of the Poincar´e group preserve quantum probabilities in all inertial frames, and define the rel- ativistic dynamics. In section 3 we construct a large set of abstract operators out of the Poincar´egenerators, and determine their commutation relations and ∗During the preparation of this paper Walter Gl¨ockle passed away.
    [Show full text]
  • Infeld–Van Der Waerden Wave Functions for Gravitons and Photons
    Vol. 38 (2007) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 8 INFELD–VAN DER WAERDEN WAVE FUNCTIONS FOR GRAVITONS AND PHOTONS J.G. Cardoso Department of Mathematics, Centre for Technological Sciences-UDESC Joinville 89223-100, Santa Catarina, Brazil [email protected] (Received March 20, 2007) A concise description of the curvature structures borne by the Infeld- van der Waerden γε-formalisms is provided. The derivation of the wave equations that control the propagation of gravitons and geometric photons in generally relativistic space-times is then carried out explicitly. PACS numbers: 04.20.Gr 1. Introduction The most striking physical feature of the Infeld-van der Waerden γε-formalisms [1] is related to the possible occurrence of geometric wave functions for photons in the curvature structures of generally relativistic space-times [2]. It appears that the presence of intrinsically geometric elec- tromagnetic fields is ultimately bound up with the imposition of a single condition upon the metric spinors for the γ-formalism, which bears invari- ance under the action of the generalized Weyl gauge group [1–5]. In the case of a spacetime which admits nowhere-vanishing Weyl spinor fields, back- ground photons eventually interact with underlying gravitons. Nevertheless, the corresponding coupling configurations turn out to be in both formalisms exclusively borne by the wave equations that control the electromagnetic propagation. Indeed, the same graviton-photon interaction prescriptions had been obtained before in connection with a presentation of the wave equations for the ε-formalism [6, 7]. As regards such earlier works, the main procedure seems to have been based upon the implementation of a set of differential operators whose definitions take up suitably contracted two- spinor covariant commutators.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Electromagnetism: Helicity, Spin, Momentum, and Angular Momentum Konstantin Y
    Dual electromagnetism: Helicity, spin, momentum, and angular momentum Konstantin Y. Bliokh1,2, Aleksandr Y. Bekshaev3, and Franco Nori1,4 1Advanced Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan 2A. Usikov Institute of Radiophysics and Electronics, NASU, Kharkov 61085, Ukraine 3I. I. Mechnikov National University, Dvorianska 2, Odessa, 65082, Ukraine 4Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1040, USA The dual symmetry between electric and magnetic fields is an important intrinsic property of Maxwell equations in free space. This symmetry underlies the conservation of optical helicity, and, as we show here, is closely related to the separation of spin and orbital degrees of freedom of light (the helicity flux coincides with the spin angular momentum). However, in the standard field-theory formulation of electromagnetism, the field Lagrangian is not dual symmetric. This leads to problematic dual-asymmetric forms of the canonical energy-momentum, spin, and orbital angular momentum tensors. Moreover, we show that the components of these tensors conflict with the helicity and energy conservation laws. To resolve this discrepancy between the symmetries of the Lagrangian and Maxwell equations, we put forward a dual-symmetric Lagrangian formulation of classical electromagnetism. This dual electromagnetism preserves the form of Maxwell equations, yields meaningful canonical energy-momentum and angular momentum tensors, and ensures a self-consistent separation of the spin and orbital degrees of freedom. This provides rigorous derivation of results suggested in other recent approaches. We make the Noether analysis of the dual symmetry and all the Poincaré symmetries, examine both local and integral conserved quantities, and show that only the dual electromagnetism naturally produces a complete self-consistent set of conservation laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.2. Deformation and Strain
    CH.2. DEFORMATION AND STRAIN Multimedia Course on Continuum Mechanics Overview Introduction Lecture 1 Deformation Gradient Tensor Material Deformation Gradient Tensor Lecture 2 Lecture 3 Inverse (Spatial) Deformation Gradient Tensor Displacements Lecture 4 Displacement Gradient Tensors Strain Tensors Green-Lagrange or Material Strain Tensor Lecture 5 Euler-Almansi or Spatial Strain Tensor Variation of Distances Stretch Lecture 6 Unit elongation Variation of Angles Lecture 7 2 Overview (cont’d) Physical interpretation of the Strain Tensors Lecture 8 Material Strain Tensor, E Spatial Strain Tensor, e Lecture 9 Polar Decomposition Lecture 10 Volume Variation Lecture 11 Area Variation Lecture 12 Volumetric Strain Lecture 13 Infinitesimal Strain Infinitesimal Strain Theory Strain Tensors Stretch and Unit Elongation Lecture 14 Physical Interpretation of Infinitesimal Strains Engineering Strains Variation of Angles 3 Overview (cont’d) Infinitesimal Strain (cont’d) Polar Decomposition Lecture 15 Volumetric Strain Strain Rate Spatial Velocity Gradient Tensor Lecture 16 Strain Rate Tensor and Rotation Rate Tensor or Spin Tensor Physical Interpretation of the Tensors Material Derivatives Lecture 17 Other Coordinate Systems Cylindrical Coordinates Lecture 18 Spherical Coordinates 4 2.1 Introduction Ch.2. Deformation and Strain 5 Deformation Deformation: transformation of a body from a reference configuration to a current configuration. Focus on the relative movement of a given particle w.r.t. the particles in its neighbourhood (at differential level). It includes changes of size and shape. 6 2.2 Deformation Gradient Tensors Ch.2. Deformation and Strain 7 Continuous Medium in Movement Ω0: non-deformed (or reference) Ω or Ωt: deformed (or present) configuration, at reference time t0. configuration, at present time t.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vectors, Tensors, and Their Operations
    A Vectors, Tensors, and Their Operations A.1 Vectors and Tensors A spatial description of the fluid motion is a geometrical description, of which the essence is to ensure that relevant physical quantities are invariant under artificially introduced coordinate systems. This is realized by tensor analysis (cf. Aris 1962). Here we introduce the concept of tensors in an informal way, through some important examples in fluid mechanics. A.1.1 Scalars and Vectors Scalars and vectors are geometric entities independent of the choice of coor- dinate systems. This independence is a necessary condition for an entity to represent some physical quantity. A scalar, say the fluid pressure p or den- sity ρ, obviously has such independence. For a vector, say the fluid velocity u, although its three components (u1,u2,u3) depend on the chosen coordi- nates, say Cartesian coordinates with unit basis vectors (e1, e2, e3), as a single geometric entity the one-form of ei, u = u1e1 + u2e2 + u3e3 = uiei,i=1, 2, 3, (A.1) has to be independent of the basis vectors. Note that Einstein’s convention has been used in the last expression of (A.1): unless stated otherwise, a repeated index always implies summation over the dimension of the space. The inner (scalar) and cross (vector) products of two vectors are familiar. If θ is the angle between the directions of a and b, these operations give a · b = |a||b| cos θ, |a × b| = |a||b| sin θ. While the inner product is a projection operation, the cross-product produces a vector perpendicular to both a and b with magnitude equal to the area of the parallelogram spanned by a and b.Thusa×b determines a vectorial area 694 A Vectors, Tensors, and Their Operations with unit vector n normal to the (a, b) plane, whose direction follows from a to b by the right-hand rule.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Role of Einstein–Cartan Gravity in Fundamental Particle Physics
    universe Article On the Role of Einstein–Cartan Gravity in Fundamental Particle Physics Carl F. Diether III and Joy Christian * Einstein Centre for Local-Realistic Physics, 15 Thackley End, Oxford OX2 6LB, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 July 2020; Accepted: 3 August 2020; Published: 5 August 2020 Abstract: Two of the major open questions in particle physics are: (1) Why do the elementary fermionic particles that are so far observed have such low mass-energy compared to the Planck energy scale? (2) What mechanical energy may be counterbalancing the divergent electrostatic and strong force energies of point-like charged fermions in the vicinity of the Planck scale? In this paper, using a hitherto unrecognised mechanism derived from the non-linear amelioration of the Dirac equation known as the Hehl–Datta equation within the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble (ECSK) extension of general relativity, we present detailed numerical estimates suggesting that the mechanical energy arising from the gravitationally coupled self-interaction in the ECSK theory can address both of these questions in tandem. Keywords: Einstein–Cartan gravity; Hehl–Datta equation; ultraviolet divergence; renormalisation; modified gravity; quantum electrodynamics; hierarchy problem; torsion; spinors 1. Introduction For over a century, Einstein’s theory of gravity has provided remarkably accurate and precise predictions for the behaviour of macroscopic bodies within our cosmos. For the elementary particles in the quantum realm, however, Einstein–Cartan theory of gravity may be more appropriate, because it incorporates spinors and associated torsion within a covariant description [1,2]. For this reason there has been considerable interest in Einstein–Cartan theory, in the light of the field equations proposed by Sciama [3] and Kibble [4].
    [Show full text]
  • True Energy-Momentum Tensors Are Unique. Electrodynamics Spin
    True energy-momentum tensors are unique. Electrodynamics spin tensor is not zero Radi I. Khrapko∗ Moscow Aviation Institute, 125993, Moscow, Russia Abstract A true energy-momentum tensor is unique and does not admit an addition of a term. The true electrodynamics’ energy-momentum tensor is the Maxwell-Minkowski tensor. It cannot be got with the Lagrange formalism. The canonical energy-momentum and spin tensors are out of all relation to the physical reality. The true electrodynamics’ spin tensor is not equal to a zero. So, electrodynamics’ ponderomotive action comprises a force from the Maxwell stress tensor and a torque from the spin tensor. A gauge non-invariant expression for the spin tensor is presented and is used for a con- sideration of a circularly polarized standing wave. A circularly polarized light beam carries a spin angular momentum and an orbital angular momentum. So, we double the beam’s angular momentum. The Beth’s experiment is considered. PACS: 03.05.De Keywords: classical spin; electrodynamics; Beth’s experiment; torque 1 An outlook on the standard electrodynamics The main points in the electrodynamics are an electric current four-vector density jα and elec- tromagnetic field which is described by a covariant skew-symmetric electromagnetic field tensor αβ αµ βν Fµν , or by a contravariant tensor F = Fµν g g (α, ν, . = 0, 1, 2, 3, or = t, x, y, z). The four-vector density jα comprises a charge density and an electric current three-vector density: jα = j0 = ρ, ji (i, k, . =1, 2, 3, or = x, y, z). gαµ = g00 =1, gij = δij .
    [Show full text]
  • Spinning String Fluid Dynamics in General Relativity
    Class. Quantum Grav. 14 (1997) 3501–3512. Printed in the UK PII: S0264-9381(97)84861-7 Spinning string fluid dynamics in general relativity Larry L Smalley and Jean P Krisch † ‡ Department of Physics, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA † Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA ‡ Received 9 June 1997 Abstract. The general, energy–momentum tensor for a dynamical, spinning string fluid in general relativity is presented using the Ray–Hilbert variational principle. The calculations are given for both the standard and the extended thermodynamics versions in which the latter includes both the spin and string as thermodynamic variables. Both versions yield the same Fermi–Walker transport of the spin with a correction term due to the string. As an unexpected general feature, it is shown that the string and spin are dual 2-forms. Examples of solutions to the field equations are given for the extension of static black holes for non-spinning, string fluids to stationary, slowly rotating black holes for spinning string fluids. These solutions are then compared with solutions obtained from the postulated energy–momentum tensor of Letelier. The general feature of these solutions for positive density is that the spin causes the event horizon for the stationary black hole to contract whether or not the spin is considered as a thermodynamic variable. PACS numbers: 0440N, 0570, 9880H 1. Introduction to spinning string fluids in general relativity The discussion of the cosmological implications of strings goes back nearly 20 years to the work of Zeldovich [1] and Vilenkin [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein-Cartan Relativity in 2-Dimensional Non-Riemannian Space
    Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-1768 Volume 13, Number 9 (2017), pp. 5945-5960 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com Einstein-Cartan Relativity in 2-Dimensional Non-Riemannian Space L. N. Katkar1 and D. R. Phadatare2 1Department of Mathematics,Shivaji University, Kolhapur 416004. 2Balasaheb Desai College, Patan,Tal: Patan, Dist: Satara 415206. Abstract We describe the Einstein-Cartan theory of gravity in a 2- dimensional non- Riemannian space. To explore the implications and features of Einstein-Cartan field equations in a 2-dimensional non-Riemannian space, we have introduced two real null vector formalism. We here after referred to it as a dyad formalism. This formalism facilitates the computational complexity and will serve as an instructional tool to simplify mathematics. The results are derived by two different methods one based on the dyad formalism and one based on the techniques of differential forms introduced by the author by introducing a new derivative operator d* defined with respect to the asymmetric connections. Both the methods will serve as an “amazingly useful” technique to reduce the complexity of mathematics. We have proved that the Einstein tensor vanishes identically yet the Riemann Curvature of the non-Riemannian 2- space is influenced by the torsion. Key words: Non-Riemann space, Riemannian Curvature, Exterior calculus, Einstein-Cartan theory of gravitation. 1. INTRODUCTION: Einstein's theory of general relativity is one of the cornerstones of modern theoretical physics and has been considered as one of the most beautiful structures of theoretical physics not just in its conceptual ingenuity and mathematical elegance but 5946 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Spin Tensors Associated with Corotational Rates and Corotational Integrals in Continua
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector International Journal of Solids and Structures 44 (2007) 5222–5235 www.elsevier.com/locate/ijsolstr Spin tensors associated with corotational rates and corotational integrals in continua K. Ghavam, R. Naghdabadi * Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11365-9567, Tehran, Iran Received 11 June 2006; received in revised form 21 November 2006; accepted 22 December 2006 Available online 28 December 2006 Abstract In many cases of constitutive modeling of continua undergoing large deformations, use of corotational rates and inte- grals is inevitable to avoid the effects of rigid body rotations. Making corotational rates associated with specific spin ten- sors is a matter of interest, which can help for a better physical interpretation of the deformation. In this paper, for a given kinematic tensor function, say G, a tensor valued function F as well as a spin tensor X0 is obtained in such a way that the corotational rate of F associated with the spin tensor X0, becomes equal to G. In other words, F is the corotational inte- gral of G associated with the spin tensor X0. Here, G is decomposed additively into the principally diagonal and the prin- cipally off-diagonal parts. The symmetric tensors with the same principally diagonal parts have the same tensor valued corotational integrals, but associated with different spin tensors, which depends on the principally off-diagonal part. For the validity of the results, the Eulerian logarithmic strain tensor is shown to be the tensor valued corotational integral of the strain rate tensor, associated with the logarithmic spin.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Second Order Tensors & Properties of Tensors
    Section 1.10 1.10 Special Second Order Tensors & Properties of Second Order Tensors In this section will be examined a number of special second order tensors, and special properties of second order tensors, which play important roles in tensor analysis. Many of the concepts will be familiar from Linear Algebra and Matrices. The following will be discussed: • The Identity tensor • Transpose of a tensor • Trace of a tensor • Norm of a tensor • Determinant of a tensor • Inverse of a tensor • Orthogonal tensors • Rotation Tensors • Change of Basis Tensors • Symmetric and Skew-symmetric tensors • Axial vectors • Spherical and Deviatoric tensors • Positive Definite tensors 1.10.1 The Identity Tensor The linear transformation which transforms every tensor into itself is called the identity tensor. This special tensor is denoted by I so that, for example, Ia = a for any vector a In particular, Ie1 = e1 , Ie 2 = e 2 , Ie3 = e3 , from which it follows that, for a Cartesian coordinate system, I ij = δ ij . In matrix form, 1 0 0 [I]= 0 1 0 (1.10.1) 0 0 1 1.10.2 The Transpose of a Tensor T The transpose of a second order tensor A with components Aij is the tensor A with components Aji ; so the transpose swaps the indices, T A = Aij ei ⊗ e j , A = Ajiei ⊗ e j Transpose of a Second-Order Tensor (1.10.2) Solid Mechanics Part III 84 Kelly Section 1.10 In matrix notation, A11 A12 A13 A11 A21 A31 = T = [A] A21 A22 A23 , [A ] A12 A22 A32 A31 A32 A33 A13 A23 A33 Some useful properties and relations involving the transpose are {▲Problem 2}: T (A T ) = A (αA + βB)T = αA T + βB T (u ⊗ v)T = v ⊗ u Tu = uTT , uT = TTu (1.10.3) (AB)T = B T A T A : B = A T : B T (u ⊗ v)A = u ⊗ (A T v) A : (BC) = (B T A) : C = (ACT ): B A formal definition of the transpose which does not rely on any particular coordinate system is as follows: the transpose of a second-order tensor is that tensor which satisfies the identity1 u ⋅ Av = v ⋅ A Tu (1.10.4) for all vectors u and v.
    [Show full text]