On the Equivalence Between the Additive Hypo- Elasto-Plasticity and Multiplicative Hyper-Elasto- Plasticity Models and Adaptive Propagation of Discontinuities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On the Equivalence Between the Additive Hypo- Elasto-Plasticity and Multiplicative Hyper-Elasto- Plasticity Models and Adaptive Propagation of Discontinuities On the Equivalence between the Additive Hypo- Elasto-Plasticity and Multiplicative Hyper-Elasto- Plasticity Models and Adaptive Propagation of Discontinuities Yang Jiao Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Yang Jiao All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT On the Equivalence between the Additive Hypo-Elasto-Plasticity and Multiplicative Hyper- Elasto-Plasticity Models and Adaptive Propagation of Discontinuities Yang Jiao Ductile and brittle failure of solids are closely related to their plastic and fracture behavior, respectively. The two most common energy dissipation mechanisms in solids possess distinct kinematic characteristics, i.e. large strain and discontinuous displacement, both of which pose challenges to reliable, efficient numerical simulation of material failure in engineering structures. This dissertation addresses the reliability and efficiency issues associated with the kinematic characteristics of plasticity and fracture. At first, studies are conducted to understand the relation between two well recognized large strain plasticity models that enjoy widespread popularity in numerical simulation of plastic behavior of solids. These two models, termed the additive hypo-elasto-plasticity and multiplicative hyper-elasto-plasticity models, respectively, are regarded as two distinct strategies for extending the classical infinitesimal deformation plasticity theory into the large strain regime. One of the most recent variants of the additive models, which features the logarithmic stress rate, is shown to give rise to nonphysical energy dissipation during elastic unloading. A simple modification to the logarithmic stress rate is accordingly made to resolve such a physical inconsistency. This results in the additive hypo-elasto-plasticity models based on the kinetic logarithmic stress rate in which energy dissipation-free elastic response is produced whenever plastic flow is absent. It is then proved that for isotropic materials the multiplicative hyper-elasto-plasticity models coincide with the additive ones if a newly discovered objective stress rate is adopted. Such an objective stress rate, termed the modified kinetic logarithmic rate, reduces to the kinetic logarithmic rate in the absence of strain-induced anisotropy which is characterized as kinematic hardening in the present dissertation. In the second part of the dissertation, the computational complexity of finite element analysis of the onset and propagation of interface cracks in layered materials is addressed. The study is conducted in the context of laminated composites in which interface fracture (delamination) is a dominant failure mode. In order to eliminate the complexities of remeshing for constant initiation and propagation of delamination, two hierarchical approaches, the extended finite element method (XFEM) and the s-version of the finite element method (s-method) are studied in terms of their effectiveness in representing displacement discontinuity across delaminated interfaces. With one single layer of 20-node serendipity solid elements resolving delamination-free response of the layered materials, it is proved that the delamination representations based on the s-method and the XFEM result in the same discretization space as the conventional non-hierarchical ply-by-ply approach which employs one layer of solid elements for each ply as well as double nodes on delaminated interfaces. Delamination indicators based on the s-method representation of delamination are then proposed to detect the onset and propagation of delamination. An adaptive methodology is accordingly developed in which the s-method displacement field enrichment for delamination is adaptively added to interface areas with high likelihood of delamination. Numerical examples show that the computational cost of the adaptive s-method is significantly lower than that incurred by the conventional ply-by-ply approach despite the fact that the two approaches produce practically identical results. Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................x Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Dissertation outline ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 Additive Hypo-Elasto-Plasticity Models Based on the Kinetic Logarithmic Stress Rate .............................................................................................................................7 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Survey of existing additive hypo-elasto-plasticity models ....................................................................... 12 2.2.1 Kinematics ..................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2 Additive decomposition of the rate of deformation tensor............................................................. 13 2.2.3 Classical formulations of finite strain additive hypo-elasto-plasticity .......................................... 14 2.2.4 Considerations of choice of objective stress rates......................................................................... 16 2.2.5 Integrability of the hypoelastic equation and the logarithmic rate ............................................... 17 2.2.6 The logarithmic spin ..................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.7 Unloading stress ratchetting obstacle test .................................................................................... 21 2.3 Path dependency of the logarithmic rotation tensor ................................................................................. 30 2.3.1 Integration of the hypoelastic equation based on the logarithmic rate ......................................... 30 i 2.3.2 Illustration of the path dependency of the logarithmic rotation tensor ......................................... 33 2.4 Kinetic logarithmic spin ........................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.1 Formulation of the kinetic logarithmic spin .................................................................................. 36 2.4.2 Verification of the kinetic logarithmic stress rate formulation ..................................................... 44 2.5 Weak invariance of the elastoplasticity model based on the kinetic logarithmic rate .............................. 48 2.6 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................. 53 Chapter 3 A Link between Multiplicative Hyper-Elasto-Plasticity and Additive Hypo- Elasto-Plasticity Models: the Modified Kinetic Logarithmic Spin.................................54 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 54 3.2 Kinematics ................................................................................................................................................ 56 3.3 Typical Structure of the multiplicative hyper-elasto-plasticity models .................................................... 58 3.4 Comments regarding the relation between the multiplicative hyper-elasto-plasticity and additive hypo- elasto-plasticity models ............................................................................................................................ 65 3.5 Bridging the multiplicative hyper-elasto-plasticity and additive hypo-elasto-plasticity models .............. 66 3.5.1 General relations .......................................................................................................................... 66 3.5.2 Consideration of specific cases ..................................................................................................... 84 3.6 Numerical Illustration ............................................................................................................................... 86 3.6.1 Elastoplastic isotropy .................................................................................................................... 86 3.6.2 Strain-induced anisotropy in the form of kinematic hardening ..................................................... 92 3.7 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................................. 96 Chapter 4 Analysis of Hierarchical and Non-Hierarchical Approaches to Representing Delamination in Laminated Composites
Recommended publications
  • Comparing Two Algorithms to Add Large Strains to a Small Strain Finite Element Code
    INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING Comparing Two Algorithms to Add Large Strains to a Small Strain Finite Element Code A. Rodríguez Ferran B. A. Huerta Publication CIMNE Nº-91, November 1996 COMPARING TWO ALGORITHMS TO ADD LARGE STRAINS TO A SMALL STRAIN FINITE ELEMENT CODE y Antonio Ro drguezFerran and Antonio Huerta Member ASCE 1 Research Assistant Departamento de MatematicaAplicada I I I ETS de Ingenieros de Caminos Universitat Politecnicade Catalunya Campus Nord C E Barcelona Spain 2 Professor Departamento de MatematicaAplicada I I I ETS de Ingenieros de Caminos Universitat Politecnicade Catalunya Campus Nord C E Barcelona Spain y Corresp onding author email huertaetseccpbupces ABSTRACT Two algorithms for the stress update ie timeintegration of the constitutive equation in large strain solid mechanics are discussed with particular emphasis on two issues the in cremental objectivity and the implementation aspects It is shown that both algorithms are incrementally objective ie they treat rigid rotations properly and that they can be employed to add large strain capabilities to a smal l strain nite element code in a simple way Aset of benchmark tests consisting of simple large deformation paths rigid rotation simple shear extension extension and compression dilatation extension and rotation have been usedto test and compare the two algorithms both for elastic and plastic analysis These tests evidence dierent time integration accuracy for each algorithm However it is demonstrated that the in general less accurate
    [Show full text]
  • Lagrangian and Eulerian Descriptions in Solid Mechanics and Their Numerical Solutions in Hpk Framework
    Lagrangian and Eulerian Descriptions in Solid Mechanics and Their Numerical Solutions in hpk Framework by Salahi Basaran B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), University of Kansas, 2000 M.S. (Mechanical Engineering), Virginia Polytechnic University, 2002 Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dr. Karan S. Surana (Advisor), Chair Dr. Peter W. TenPas Dr. Ray Taghavi Dr. Albert Romkes Dr. Bedru Yimer Date Defended The Thesis committee for Salahi Basaran certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: Lagrangian and Eulerian Descriptions in Solid Mechanics and Their Numerical Solutions in hpk Framework Committee: Dr. Karan S. Surana (Advisor), Chair Dr. Peter W. TenPas Dr. Ray Taghavi Dr. Albert Romkes Dr. Bedru Yimer Date approved i This thesis is dedicated to my beloved parents and to my brother who is also my best friend ii Acknowledgments I would like to extend my sincerest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Karan S. Surana (Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor). I would like to extend my thanks to him for his enthusiasm and constantly pushing me to be better. I thank Dr. Surana not only for providing me financial support during my dissertation but also for granting access to the Computational Mechanics Laboratory at the University of Kansas. The financial support provided by DEPSCoR/AFOSR through grant numbers F49620-03- 01-0298 to the University of Kansas, Department of Mechanical Engineering and through grant number F49620-03-01-0201 to Texas A&M University is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Geometric Structure of the Stress and Strain Tensors, Dual Variables and Objective Rates in Continuum Mechanics
    Arch. Mech., 44, ~ . pp. 527-556, Warszawa 1992 On the geometric structure of the stress and strain tensors, dual variables and objective rates in continuum mechanics C. SANSOUR (STUITGART) THE GEOMETRIC STRUCTURE of the stress and strain tensors arising in continuum mechanics is in­ vestigated. All tensors are cla-;sified into two families, each consists of two subgroups regarded as phystcally equivalent since they are isometric. Special attention is focussed on the Cauchy stress tensor and it is proved that, corresponding to it, no dual strain meac;ure exists. Some new stress ten­ sors are formulated and the physical meaning of the stress tensor dual to the Alman8i strain tensor is made apparent by employing a new decomposition of the Cauchy stress tensor with respect to a Lagrangian basis. It is shown that push-forward/pull-back under the deformation gradient applied to two work conjugate stress and strain tensors do not result in further dual tensors. The rotation field is incorporated as an independent variable by considering simple materials to be constrained Cosserat continua. By the geometric structure of the involved tensors, it is claimed that only the Lie derivative with respect to the flow generated by the rotation group (Green-Naghdi objective rate) can be considered ac; occurring naturally in solid mechanics and preserving the physical equivalence in rate form. 1. Introduction IN THE LAST DECADE the interest in the simulation of large solid deformations incorporat­ ing finite strains has been immensely growing. The inclusion of finite strain deformations necessitates a geometrically exact description of the strain measures and enforces a new look at the corresponding stress tensors.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to FINITE STRAIN THEORY for CONTINUUM ELASTO
    RED BOX RULES ARE FOR PROOF STAGE ONLY. DELETE BEFORE FINAL PRINTING. WILEY SERIES IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS HASHIGUCHI WILEY SERIES IN COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS YAMAKAWA Introduction to for to Introduction FINITE STRAIN THEORY for CONTINUUM ELASTO-PLASTICITY CONTINUUM ELASTO-PLASTICITY KOICHI HASHIGUCHI, Kyushu University, Japan Introduction to YUKI YAMAKAWA, Tohoku University, Japan Elasto-plastic deformation is frequently observed in machines and structures, hence its prediction is an important consideration at the design stage. Elasto-plasticity theories will FINITE STRAIN THEORY be increasingly required in the future in response to the development of new and improved industrial technologies. Although various books for elasto-plasticity have been published to date, they focus on infi nitesimal elasto-plastic deformation theory. However, modern computational THEORY STRAIN FINITE for CONTINUUM techniques employ an advanced approach to solve problems in this fi eld and much research has taken place in recent years into fi nite strain elasto-plasticity. This book describes this approach and aims to improve mechanical design techniques in mechanical, civil, structural and aeronautical engineering through the accurate analysis of fi nite elasto-plastic deformation. ELASTO-PLASTICITY Introduction to Finite Strain Theory for Continuum Elasto-Plasticity presents introductory explanations that can be easily understood by readers with only a basic knowledge of elasto-plasticity, showing physical backgrounds of concepts in detail and derivation processes
    [Show full text]
  • ROTATION: a Review of Useful Theorems Involving Proper Orthogonal Matrices Referenced to Three- Dimensional Physical Space
    Unlimited Release Printed May 9, 2002 ROTATION: A review of useful theorems involving proper orthogonal matrices referenced to three- dimensional physical space. Rebecca M. Brannon† and coauthors to be determined †Computational Physics and Mechanics T Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, NM 87185-0820 Abstract Useful and/or little-known theorems involving33× proper orthogonal matrices are reviewed. Orthogonal matrices appear in the transformation of tensor compo- nents from one orthogonal basis to another. The distinction between an orthogonal direction cosine matrix and a rotation operation is discussed. Among the theorems and techniques presented are (1) various ways to characterize a rotation including proper orthogonal tensors, dyadics, Euler angles, axis/angle representations, series expansions, and quaternions; (2) the Euler-Rodrigues formula for converting axis and angle to a rotation tensor; (3) the distinction between rotations and reflections, along with implications for “handedness” of coordinate systems; (4) non-commu- tivity of sequential rotations, (5) eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a rotation; (6) the polar decomposition theorem for expressing a general deformation as a se- quence of shape and volume changes in combination with pure rotations; (7) mix- ing rotations in Eulerian hydrocodes or interpolating rotations in discrete field approximations; (8) Rates of rotation and the difference between spin and vortici- ty, (9) Random rotations for simulating crystal distributions; (10) The principle of material frame indifference (PMFI); and (11) a tensor-analysis presentation of classical rigid body mechanics, including direct notation expressions for momen- tum and energy and the extremely compact direct notation formulation of Euler’s equations (i.e., Newton’s law for rigid bodies).
    [Show full text]
  • Spin in Relativistic Quantum Theory∗
    Spin in relativistic quantum theory∗ W. N. Polyzou, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 W. Gl¨ockle, Institut f¨urtheoretische Physik II, Ruhr-Universit¨at Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany H. Wita la M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, PL-30059 Krak´ow,Poland today Abstract We discuss the role of spin in Poincar´einvariant formulations of quan- tum mechanics. 1 Introduction In this paper we discuss the role of spin in relativistic few-body models. The new feature with spin in relativistic quantum mechanics is that sequences of rotationless Lorentz transformations that map rest frames to rest frames can generate rotations. To get a well-defined spin observable one needs to define it in one preferred frame and then use specific Lorentz transformations to relate the spin in the preferred frame to any other frame. Different choices of the preferred frame and the specific Lorentz transformations lead to an infinite number of possible observables that have all of the properties of a spin. This paper provides a general discussion of the relation between the spin of a system and the spin of its elementary constituents in relativistic few-body systems. In section 2 we discuss the Poincar´egroup, which is the group relating inertial frames in special relativity. Unitary representations of the Poincar´e group preserve quantum probabilities in all inertial frames, and define the rel- ativistic dynamics. In section 3 we construct a large set of abstract operators out of the Poincar´egenerators, and determine their commutation relations and ∗During the preparation of this paper Walter Gl¨ockle passed away.
    [Show full text]
  • Infeld–Van Der Waerden Wave Functions for Gravitons and Photons
    Vol. 38 (2007) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 8 INFELD–VAN DER WAERDEN WAVE FUNCTIONS FOR GRAVITONS AND PHOTONS J.G. Cardoso Department of Mathematics, Centre for Technological Sciences-UDESC Joinville 89223-100, Santa Catarina, Brazil [email protected] (Received March 20, 2007) A concise description of the curvature structures borne by the Infeld- van der Waerden γε-formalisms is provided. The derivation of the wave equations that control the propagation of gravitons and geometric photons in generally relativistic space-times is then carried out explicitly. PACS numbers: 04.20.Gr 1. Introduction The most striking physical feature of the Infeld-van der Waerden γε-formalisms [1] is related to the possible occurrence of geometric wave functions for photons in the curvature structures of generally relativistic space-times [2]. It appears that the presence of intrinsically geometric elec- tromagnetic fields is ultimately bound up with the imposition of a single condition upon the metric spinors for the γ-formalism, which bears invari- ance under the action of the generalized Weyl gauge group [1–5]. In the case of a spacetime which admits nowhere-vanishing Weyl spinor fields, back- ground photons eventually interact with underlying gravitons. Nevertheless, the corresponding coupling configurations turn out to be in both formalisms exclusively borne by the wave equations that control the electromagnetic propagation. Indeed, the same graviton-photon interaction prescriptions had been obtained before in connection with a presentation of the wave equations for the ε-formalism [6, 7]. As regards such earlier works, the main procedure seems to have been based upon the implementation of a set of differential operators whose definitions take up suitably contracted two- spinor covariant commutators.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of Compliant Structures
    CHAPTER 5 Mechanics of compliant structures C. H. M. Jenkins1, W. W. Schur2 & G. Greshchik3 1Compliant Structures Laboratory, Mechanical Engineering Department South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, USA. 2Balloon Projects Branch Code 842, NASA Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, USA. 3Center for Aerospace Structures, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. Abstract Biological organisms must be structurally efficient. Hence it is not surprising that nature has embraced the compliant membrane structure as a central element in higher biological forms. This chapter discusses the unique challenges of modeling the mechanical behavior of compliant membrane structures. In particular, we focus on several special characteristics, such as large deformation, lack of bending rigidity, material nonlinearity, and computational schemes. 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation Biological organisms must be structurally efficient. They have benefited from millions of years of evolution to achieve, for example, high load carrying capacity per unit weight. It is not surprising then to find that compliant membrane structures play a significant role in nature, for membranes are among the most efficient of structural elements. Long ago, engineers adopted membrane structures for solutions where structural efficiency was critical. As an example, consider the working balloon. For a given balloon volume, the total lift available is fixed, implying a zero-sum trade between structure and payload. Modern high-altitude scientific balloons (Fig. 1), made of thin polymer film fractions of a millimeter thick with areal densities of a few grams per square meter, support payloads of a few tons! WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Eng ineering, Vol 20, © 2005 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1755-8336 (on-line) doi:10.2495/978-1-85312-941-4/05 86 Compliant Structures in Nature and Engineering Figure 1: Preparing to launch a high-altitude scientific balloon in Antarctica (courtesy NASA).
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperelasticity Primer Robert M
    Hyperelasticity Primer Robert M. Hackett Hyperelasticity Primer Second Edition Robert M. Hackett Department of Civil Engineering The University of Mississippi University, MS, USA ISBN 978-3-319-73200-8 ISBN 978-3-319-73201-5 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73201-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018930881 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2016, 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer International Publishing AG part of Springer Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Electromagnetism: Helicity, Spin, Momentum, and Angular Momentum Konstantin Y
    Dual electromagnetism: Helicity, spin, momentum, and angular momentum Konstantin Y. Bliokh1,2, Aleksandr Y. Bekshaev3, and Franco Nori1,4 1Advanced Science Institute, RIKEN, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan 2A. Usikov Institute of Radiophysics and Electronics, NASU, Kharkov 61085, Ukraine 3I. I. Mechnikov National University, Dvorianska 2, Odessa, 65082, Ukraine 4Physics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1040, USA The dual symmetry between electric and magnetic fields is an important intrinsic property of Maxwell equations in free space. This symmetry underlies the conservation of optical helicity, and, as we show here, is closely related to the separation of spin and orbital degrees of freedom of light (the helicity flux coincides with the spin angular momentum). However, in the standard field-theory formulation of electromagnetism, the field Lagrangian is not dual symmetric. This leads to problematic dual-asymmetric forms of the canonical energy-momentum, spin, and orbital angular momentum tensors. Moreover, we show that the components of these tensors conflict with the helicity and energy conservation laws. To resolve this discrepancy between the symmetries of the Lagrangian and Maxwell equations, we put forward a dual-symmetric Lagrangian formulation of classical electromagnetism. This dual electromagnetism preserves the form of Maxwell equations, yields meaningful canonical energy-momentum and angular momentum tensors, and ensures a self-consistent separation of the spin and orbital degrees of freedom. This provides rigorous derivation of results suggested in other recent approaches. We make the Noether analysis of the dual symmetry and all the Poincaré symmetries, examine both local and integral conserved quantities, and show that only the dual electromagnetism naturally produces a complete self-consistent set of conservation laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1903.03835V1 [Gr-Qc] 9 Mar 2019 [15–17] Thus Modifying Significantly the Orbit of 3
    Spinning particle orbits around a black hole in an expanding background I. Antoniou,1, ∗ D. Papadopoulos,2, y and L. Perivolaropoulos1, z 1Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, GR-45110, Ioannina, Greece 2Department of Physics, University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki,54124, Greece (Dated: March 12, 2019) We investigate analytically and numerically the orbits of spinning particles around black holes in the post Newtonian limit and in the presence of cosmic expansion. We show that orbits that are circular in the absence of spin, get deformed when the orbiting particle has spin. We show that the origin of this deformation is twofold: a. the background expansion rate which induces an attractive (repulsive) interaction due to the cosmic background fluid when the expansion is decelerating (accelerating) and b. a spin-orbit interaction which can be attractive or repulsive depending on the relative orientation between spin and orbital angular momentum and on the expansion rate. PACS numbers: 04.20.Cv, 97.60.Lf, 98.62.Dm I. INTRODUCTION bound systems in the presence of phantom dark energy with equation of state parameter w < −1 Even though most astrophysical bodies have [2{4]. In the absence of expansion but in the spins and evolve in an expanding cosmological presence of spin for the test particles it has been background, their motion is described well by ig- shown that spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions noring the cosmic expansion and under the non- in a Kerr spacetime can lead to deformations of spinning test particle approximation for large dis- circular orbits for large spin values [14].
    [Show full text]
  • Ch.2. Deformation and Strain
    CH.2. DEFORMATION AND STRAIN Multimedia Course on Continuum Mechanics Overview Introduction Lecture 1 Deformation Gradient Tensor Material Deformation Gradient Tensor Lecture 2 Lecture 3 Inverse (Spatial) Deformation Gradient Tensor Displacements Lecture 4 Displacement Gradient Tensors Strain Tensors Green-Lagrange or Material Strain Tensor Lecture 5 Euler-Almansi or Spatial Strain Tensor Variation of Distances Stretch Lecture 6 Unit elongation Variation of Angles Lecture 7 2 Overview (cont’d) Physical interpretation of the Strain Tensors Lecture 8 Material Strain Tensor, E Spatial Strain Tensor, e Lecture 9 Polar Decomposition Lecture 10 Volume Variation Lecture 11 Area Variation Lecture 12 Volumetric Strain Lecture 13 Infinitesimal Strain Infinitesimal Strain Theory Strain Tensors Stretch and Unit Elongation Lecture 14 Physical Interpretation of Infinitesimal Strains Engineering Strains Variation of Angles 3 Overview (cont’d) Infinitesimal Strain (cont’d) Polar Decomposition Lecture 15 Volumetric Strain Strain Rate Spatial Velocity Gradient Tensor Lecture 16 Strain Rate Tensor and Rotation Rate Tensor or Spin Tensor Physical Interpretation of the Tensors Material Derivatives Lecture 17 Other Coordinate Systems Cylindrical Coordinates Lecture 18 Spherical Coordinates 4 2.1 Introduction Ch.2. Deformation and Strain 5 Deformation Deformation: transformation of a body from a reference configuration to a current configuration. Focus on the relative movement of a given particle w.r.t. the particles in its neighbourhood (at differential level). It includes changes of size and shape. 6 2.2 Deformation Gradient Tensors Ch.2. Deformation and Strain 7 Continuous Medium in Movement Ω0: non-deformed (or reference) Ω or Ωt: deformed (or present) configuration, at reference time t0. configuration, at present time t.
    [Show full text]