DOCSLIB.ORG

Performance Work Statement for Guardian Angel Rescue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Performance Work Statement for Guardian Angel Rescue PWS 19 Oct 18 Solicitation No. FA4890-18-R-5022 PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT FOR GUARDIAN ANGEL RESCUE INSTRUCTIONAL AND TRAINING SERVICES OPR: DAVIS MONTHAN AFB, TUSCON i PWS 19 Oct 18 Solicitation No. FA4890-18-R-5022 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Mission ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Contract Scope .................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 Places of Performance ...................................................................................................... 1 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1.5 Government Program and Contract Management ............................................................ 1 1.6 Personnel Management. .................................................................................................... 2 1.7 Meeting Support ............................................................................................................... 3 1.8 Reporting Requirements ................................................................................................... 4 1.9 Associate Contractor Agreements .................................................................................... 4 1.10 Information Management ................................................................................................. 4 1.11 Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health .............................................................. 5 1.12 Weapons, Firearms, and Ammunition .............................................................................. 6 1.13 Traffic Laws ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.14 Access to Installation during Force Protection Conditions .............................................. 6 TRAINING REQUIREMENTS 1.15 General / Advanced Planning Details ............................................................................... 6 1.16 Instructional Support and Logistics .................................................................................. 8 1.17 Fixed / Rotary Wing Aircraft Requirements and Operational Availability ...................... 8 1.18 5-Level Course Training Phase Requirements ................................................................. 8 1.19 7 Level Couse Training Phase Requirements ................................................................. 14 SECURITY 1.20 Security and Installation Requirements .......................................................................... 16 1.21 Personnel Security .......................................................................................................... 17 1.22 Information and System Security ................................................................................... 17 SECTION 2 SERVICE SUMMARY SERVICES SUMMARY (SS) NARRATIVE 2.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Components .................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) ................................................................ 19 2.4 Right to Surveil ............................................................................................................... 19 2.5 Major Non- conformance ............................................................................................... 19 2.6 Minor Non-Conformance ............................................................................................... 19 Services Summary Table ................................................................................................ 20 MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS, AND IMPROVEMENT (MA&I) 2.7 Quality Assurance ........................................................................................................... 20 2.8 Evaluations ..................................................................................................................... 20 i PWS 19 Oct 18 Solicitation No. FA4890-18-R-5022 SECTION 3 GOVERNMENT/CONTRACTOR-FURNISHED PROPERTY AND SERVICE GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY AND SERVICES 3.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 22 3.2 Government Furnished Property ..................................................................................... 22 3.3 Government Furnished Facilities .................................................................................... 22 3.4 Government Furnished Equipment ................................................................................. 22 3.5 Government Furnished Materials ................................................................................... 23 3.6 Government Furnished Services ..................................................................................... 23 3.7 Contractor Furnished Property and Services .................................................................. 23 SECTION 4 GENERAL INFORMATION TRANSITION 4.1 Functional Responsibility ............................................................................................... 29 4.2 Phase-In Plan .................................................................................................................. 29 4.3 Phase-Out Plan ............................................................................................................... 29 4.4 Phase-in/Phase-out Responsibilities ............................................................................... 29 4.5 Schedule .......................................................................................................................... 29 4.6 Access to Facilities ......................................................................................................... 29 HOURS OF OPERATION 4.7 Normal Hours of operation ............................................................................................. 30 4.8 Federal Holidays ............................................................................................................. 30 4.9 Employee Travel ............................................................................................................. 30 4.10 Overtime ......................................................................................................................... 31 4.11 Contract Man-Year Equivalent (CME) Reporting .......................................................... 31 4.12 Additions, Relocation and Closures ............................................................................... 31 APPENDIX A – Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms ............................................................... 32 APPENDIX B – Plans and Reports (CDRLS) ........................................................................................... 39 APPENDIX C – Key Personnel / Qualifications ....................................................................................... 41 APPENDIX D – Publications and Forms .................................................................................................. 46 APPENDIX E – Government-Furnished Equipment and Materials .......................................................... 49 APPENDIX F – Contractor Proposal Strength Incorporations .................................................................. 50 ii PWS 19 Oct 18 Solicitation No. FA4890-18-R-5022 SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES SCOPE OF WORK. 1.1. Background. The 68th Rescue Squadron (68 RQS) is the Air Force’s Guardian Angel Formal Training Unit (FTU). Guardian Angel is comprised of Combat Rescue Officers (CRO), Pararescuemen (PJ), and Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) specialists. Guardian Angel (GA) provides support to Geographic Combatant Commanders’ (GCC) Personnel Recovery (PR), Combat Search & Rescue (CSAR), Global Precision Strike and United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) Special Operations requirements. Guardian Angel also provides direct support to the President of the United States, Secretary of Defense, and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) manned spaceflight missions. Specialized education and training is required to develop qualified PJ/CROs to ensure mission success. 1.2. Mission. The mission of the 68 RQS is to provide combat leaders, highly trained recovery specialists, and military free fall jumpmasters for the United States, its friends, and allies. 1.3. Contract Scope. Except as specified in Section 3, Government Furnished Property and Services, the Contractor shall provide personnel, aircraft, boats, vehicles, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and any other items and services required to successfully perform PJ 5-level and 7-level upgrade services as outlined in Section 1 and to meet the tasks, standards, and conditions requirements of the Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP). The primary objectives of this contract are: 1) Maximize operational effectiveness and combat capability, and, 2) Preserve Air Force personnel and material resources. 1.3.1. Budget. The Government has budgeted for all CLINS to be exercised for this acquisition. This budget includes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis]
    Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis] Preface Commander’s Foreword 2 The History of Davis-Monthan AFB 3 Economic Impact Tables Table 1 – Executive Summary 4 Table 2-3 – Total Personnel / Annual Payroll by Classification and 5 Housing Location Table 4-5 – Total Civilian Personnel / Payroll by Appropriated and 6 Non-Appropriated Funds Table 6 – Expense Report 7 Table 7-8 – Indirect Jobs Created / Tucson Retiree Data 8 Table 9 – Economic Impact Estimate 9 Economic Impact Charts Chart 1 – Annual Economic Impact Estimates (w/o retirees) 9 Chart 2-3 – Appropriated Funds Military Payroll / Assigned 10 Chart 4-5 – Appropriated Funds Civilian Payroll / Military Retiree 11 Payments Chart 6-7 – Annual Estimated Jobs Created ($M / # Jobs) 12 1 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base [Economic Impact Analysis] 2016 PREFACE Commander’s Foreword Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (D-M AFB) is pleased to present its Economic Impact Analysis for Fiscal Year 2016. The Wing’s mission is clear: Deploy, employ, support, and sustain attack airpower in support of Combatant Commanders anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice; train the finest attack pilots for the Combat Air Forces; provide every member of Team D-M with responsive, tailored, mission-focused base support. The Wing’s vision is resolute: A premier Fighter Wing comprised of resilient Airmen, armed with precise tools and training; powered by a culture of leadership and innovation; prepared to provide responsive combat airpower which exceeds Combatant Command expectations for excellence. Members of D-M AFB live, work, and educate their children in the Tucson area.
    [Show full text]
  • Air and Space Power Journal: Fall 2011
    Fall 2011 Volume XXV, No. 3 AFRP 10-1 From the Editor Personnel Recovery in Focus ❙ 6 Lt Col David H. Sanchez, Deputy Chief, Professional Journals Capt Wm. Howard, Editor Senior Leader Perspective Air Force Personnel Recovery as a Service Core Function ❙ 7 It’s Not “Your Father’s Combat Search and Rescue” Brig Gen Kenneth E. Todorov, USAF Col Glenn H. Hecht, USAF Features Air Force Rescue ❙ 16 A Multirole Force for a Complex World Col Jason L. Hanover, USAF Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 3002.01E, Personnel Recovery in the Department of Defense, highlights personnel recovery (PR) as one of the DOD’s highest priorities. As an Air Force core function, PR has experienced tremendous success, having performed 9,000 joint/multinational combat saves in the last two years and having flown a total of 15,750 sorties since 11 September 2001. Despite this admirable record, the author contends that the declining readiness of aircraft and equipment as well as chronic staffing shortages prevents Air Force rescue from meeting the requirements of combatant commanders around the globe. To halt rescue’s decline, a numbered Air Force must represent this core function, there- by ensuring strong advocacy and adequate resources for this lifesaving, DOD-mandated function. Strategic Rescue ❙ 26 Vectoring Airpower Advocates to Embrace the Real Value of Personnel Recovery Maj Chad Sterr, USAF The Air Force rescue community has expanded beyond its traditional image of rescuing downed air- crews to encompass a much larger set of capabilities and competencies that have strategic impact on US operations around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices Study 2014
    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ACC Takes Combat Search, Rescue Assets Under Wing
    ACC takes combat search, rescue assets under wing http://www.ellsworth.af.mil/news/story_print.asp?id=123019174 ACC takes combat search, rescue assets under wing Air Combat Command News Service 4/7/2006 - LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va. -- Air Combat Command took administrative control of select Air Force combat search and rescue assets from Air Force Special Operations Command Monday as part of a realignment announced in February. The transfer ensures Air Force combat search and rescue, or CSAR, is directly linked to the combat air forces and the personnel they support. This consolidates the management of limited Air Force resources and provides a clearer presentation of force in the theater. Under ACC, CSAR assets can be mobilized faster during a national crisis, integrated into combat training and tasked to support all air and space expeditionary force rotations, ACC officials said. Moving the CSAR mission under ACC will be completely transparent to the warfighter. They will continue, as before, to gain CSAR capability from the owning major command. The transfer will affect most active-duty operational HC-130s, HH-60 Pave Hawks and most combat rescue officers and pararescuemen, as well as the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center at Langley Air Force Base, Va. Units transferred from AFSOC to ACC will not relocate. In addition, Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard units will remain administratively controlled by Air Force Reserve Command and their respective states, but will be gained by ACC or Pacific Air Forces when fully mobilized. Active-duty units affected by the transfer are the 347th Rescue Wing at Moody AFB, Ga., and all subordinate units; the 563rd Rescue Group at Davis-Monthan AFB, Ariz., and all subordinate units; the HH-60G Combined Test Force at Nellis AFB, Nev.; and the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center at Langley AFB, Va.
    [Show full text]
  • WRP Military Asset List (MAL)
    WRP Military Asset List (MAL) The Western Regional Partnership (WRP) has compiled the Military Asset List (MAL), a set of summaries describing the history, missions, and importance of installations in the WRP region. These fact sheets include installations from all of the Services and the National Guard. The summaries provide overviews of the military installations and ranges throughout the WRP's region. Their purpose is to better inform WRP Partners on the importance of these installations and ranges and Installations, such as Naval Base their missions by providing brief, accurate, uniform surveys of our assets Point Loma, often encompass vital and their missions from a single source. natural habitats. (U.S. Navy photo) These summaries use only publicly available information and are written WRP VISION STATEMENT for the policy maker new to military issues and the military savvy person WRP will be a significant resource to needing specific military information. It is our hope that WRP Partners proactively address common goals, identify emerging issues and develop use these summaries as a tool for future land use and environmental solutions that support WRP Partners policy and planning efforts throughout WRP's region, ultimately using and protect natural resources, while them to help prevent or mitigate encroachment. promoting sustainability, homeland security and military readiness. WRP MISSION STATEMENT WRP provides a proactive and collaborative framework for senior- policy level Federal, State and Tribal leadership to identify common goals and emerging issues in the states of Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah and to develop solutions that support WRP Partners and protect natural resources, while promoting sustainability, homeland security and military readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern and Old School Parajumpers, Rechts Veteraan Mario Patruno
    De geschiedenis herhaalt zich ... slecht weer verstiert het resultaat 20 september 2014 - Vliegbasis Eindho­ ven. Het is vroeg in de ochtend en een dichte mist hangt over de luchtmacht­ basis. Op de flightline doemt vanuit de donkere, grijze mist het spookachtige silhouet van een C-47 Skytrain op. Ach­ ter dit oude werkpaard staan negen C-130 Hercules vliegtuigen van ver­ Kop: Modern and Old School parajumpers, schillende luchtmachten klaar om het ling zijn van een Tweede Wereldoorlog­ rechts veteraan Mario Patruno. luchtruim te kiezen. Honderden para­ missie. Soms moesten parajumpers Hierbovene: De enige vliegende veteraan: jumpers wachten buiten de kisten op -vanwege het slechte weer boven de een C-47 Skytrain in de kleuren van het nieuws over hun aankomende missie. frontlinie- dagen of weken wachten om 87th Troop Carrier Squadron Zullen zij orders ontvangen om hun uit­ hun missie uit te kunnen voeren. Ook 70 rusting om te hangen en naar de wach­ jaar geleden stonden moedige parachu­ forceren om Duitsland via de Neder-Rijn tende transportkisten te lopen om naar tisten te wachten op de start van Ope­ binnen te vallen. de dropzone gebracht te worden of zal ratie Market Garden. Doel van het plan de missie worden afgelast vanwege het was om bruggen te veroveren over de Operatie Market Garden slechte weer? Maas, Waal en Rijn om zo het noorde­ Operatie Market Garden was één van lijke deel van Nederland te bevrijden van de grootste geallieerde operaties van Deze scène kan gemakkelijk een herha- de Duitse bezetter en een doorgang te de Tweede Wereldoorlog en de grootste 46 FULL STOP 14-4 ~ ANG r x,,,ftirf 11'37 3 7 van 16th AS is een niet hfjning in Europa.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Veterans in St Clement Cemetery the St Clement Cemetery Is Located on Engleman West of Van Dyke
    Civil War Veterans in St Clement Cemetery The St Clement Cemetery is located on Engleman West of Van Dyke. It is the biggest of our area's pioneer cemeteries the first known recorded burial was March 27, 1854. It is possible that there were a few before that date. Over 800 burials date from the nineteenth century and over 1,500 burials prior to1943. There are over 200 veterans buried in St Clement Cemetery. See historian Wesley Arnold's free CD of Warren- Center Line Records which has pictures and indexes of all of the old grave stones in both Warren's Union Cemetery and St Clement's Cemetery. These two cemeteries hold most of the remains of the pioneers of Warren. There were also local farm burials prior to 1850 but records of these are lost. One house on what was the old River Road has a stone marker. Visit my Historical web site at macombhistory.us where there are lots of pictures. Civil War Vets buried in St Clement Cemetery Center Line Michigan Conrad Louis B Sep 29, 1837 (Ger) Enlisted as a Private inn Battery K, first Michigan Light Artillery Sept 11, 1863 at Detroit for 3 years, age 25, Mustered Sept 28, 1863. Joined battery at camp Barry D. c. Oct 1, 1863. Mustered out at Detroit July 22, 1865. Widow Magdelena filed 3/2/1901. In 1900 census as Lewis Conrad. D Feb 12, 1901 Dunn John B 1839 (NY) Troy MI Enlisted in Co D, 22 Mi Infantry, Aug 11, 1862 at Pontiac, for 3 years, age 22.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Awards To
    AIRLIFT / TANKER QUARTERLY Volume Number FALL 2019 27 04 THE AIRLIFT / TANKER ASSOCIATION Pages 12-15 Air Transportation Career Field “Port Dawgs” and the Air Transportation Legacy Team 2019 HALL OF FAME INDUCTEE 2019 A/TA Pages 26-54 AWARDS A SALUTE Pages 56-65 TO OUR INDUSTRY PARTNERS UsingUsingUsingUsing the thethe the latest latestlatest latest AirliftAirlift Support Support AirliftAirlift Support Support technologytechnologytechnologytechnology to toto to provide provideprovide provide thethethethe greatest greatestgreatest greatest good. good.good. good. PhotoPhoto courtesy courtesy of of U.S. U.S. Air Air Force Force PhotoPhoto courtesy courtesy of U.S.of U.S. Air Air Force Force YouYou can’t can’t be be a a force force for for peace peace if if your your equipment equipment isn’t isn’t ready. ready. That’s That’s why why we we YouYou can’t can’t be be a force a force for for peace peace if yourif your equipment equipment isn’t isn’t ready. ready. That’s That’s why why we we partnerpartner with with you you to to offer offer the the performance-based performance-based logistics, logistics, technology technology upgrades, upgrades, partnerpartner with with you you to tooffer offer the the performance-based performance-based logistics, logistics, technology technology upgrades, upgrades, andand reliability reliability improvement improvement programs programs that that will will renew renew aircraft aircraft and and help help deliver deliver andand reliability reliability improvement improvement programs programs that that will will renew renew aircraft aircraft and and help help deliver deliver salvationsalvation as as cost cost effectively effectively as as cargo.
    [Show full text]
  • Davis-Monthan Air Force Base May 2012 Arizona
    AIR COMBAT COMMAND INSTALLATION SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT REPORT A-10 Revised/Updated Final Davis-Monthan Air Force Base May 2012 Arizona Sustainability assessment summary of Davis-Monthan Air Force Base to establish baseline metrics, to identify actionable opportunities and investment strategies, and to facilitate year-over-year comparisons. ACC/A7PS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 2 A. Installation Sustainability Assessment (ISA) Definition...................................................................... 2 B. ISA and the DoD Strategic Sustainability Performance Plan ......................................................... 2 C. Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 6 D. Setting the Context ................................................................................................................................. 6 E. Process ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Data Collection Categories ............................................................................................................. 6 2. Preliminary Research and Data Collection ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force MAJCOM Operations in Tucson……….……………………………………
    Strategy for Community Action and Support for Davis Monthan AFB, the Air National Guard at Tucson International Airport and other Arizona Military bases Written for the Joint Steering Committee, consisting of the DM50, the Southern Arizona Defense Alliance, the City of Tucson and Pima County by The Partnership of S’relli Consulting, LLC and Mr. Fred Pease Eugene D. Santarelli, Lieutenant General (Retired) Gerald F. “Fred” Pease Jr., Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Retired) Table of Contents Strategy for Community Action and Support for Davis-Monthan AFB, the Air National Guard at Tucson International Airport and other Arizona Military bases Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………… 1 List of recommendations in this report…………………………………………………… 3 About the Authors……………………………………………………………………….. 6 Tasking and purpose of the report ………………………………………………………. 7 Approach used to develop the strategy in this report……………………………………. 7 Davis-Monthan Base History……………………………………………………………. 12 Factors relating to the military value of Air Force Bases…………………………………. 13 Tucson’s Anchor Factors…………………………………………………………………. 14 Tucson’s Operational Advantages………………………………………………………… 16 Challenges………………………………………………………………………………… 20 Current Air Force Basing process………………………………………………………… 27 Insight into future basing actions………………………………………………………… 29 Relationship of DM, TIA, Ft Huachuca, WAATS and Raytheon………………………... 30 Descriptions of Air Force Major Commands (MAJCOMs)……………………………… 31 Air Force MAJCOM Operations in Tucson……….…………………………………….. 33 Community Support……………………………………………………………………… 36 Attachments Attachment 1 - Encroachment Attachment 2 – SADA 2016 Community Survey i Acronyms 12AF……………… Twelfth Air Force AATC…………….. Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Test Center ACC…………........ Air Combat Command AETC…………….. Air Education and Training Command AFB………………. Air Force Base AFCP…………….. Air Force Community Partnership AFMC……………. Air Force Material Command AFRES………...…. Air Force Reserve AFSC……………… Air Force Sustainment Center AMARG………….
    [Show full text]
  • Usafalmanac ■ Major Commands a Major Command Is a Subdivision of the Air Force Assigned a Major Part of the Air Force Mission and Directly Subordinate to Hq
    USAFAlmanac ■ Major Commands A major command is a subdivision of the Air Force assigned a major part of the Air Force mission and directly subordinate to Hq. USAF. In general, there are two types of major commands: functional and geographical. Air Combat Command Headquarters Langley AFB, Va. Established June 1, 1992 ACC Commander Gen. Hal M. Hornburg MISSIONS Major operations PERSONNEL Operate USAF bombers (active Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan); (as of Sept. 30, 2003) and ANG and AFRC gained); Iraqi Freedom (Iraq); Noble Eagle Active duty 93,115 USAF’s CONUS-based (active and (US) Officers 13,094 gained) fighter and attack, recon- Major training exercises Enlisted 80,021 naissance, battle management, and Air Warrior and AW II; Amalgam Reserve components 54,459 command and control aircraft and Warrior; Baltops; Blue Advance; ANG 45,469 intelligence and surveillance sys- Blue Flag; Bright Star; Cooperative AFRC 8,990 tems Zenith; Eagle Flag; Fuertas Civilian 9,690 Organize, train, equip, and Defensas; Global Guardian; Initial Total 157,264 maintain combat-ready forces for Link; Internal Look; Joint Task rapid deployment and employment Force Exercise; Linked Seas; to meet the challenges of peace- Maple Flag; New Horizons; North- time air sovereignty and wartime air ern Viking; Red Flag; Roving defense Sands; Rugged Arch; Strong Re- Provide combat airpower to solve America’s warfighting commands (Central, European, Northern, Pa- cific, and Southern); nuclear, con- ventional, and information operations forces to STRATCOM; air defense forces to NORAD COROLLARY MISSIONS Monitor and intercept illegal drug traffic Test new combat equipment FORCE STRUCTURE Three numbered air forces: 8th, USAF photo by MSgt.
    [Show full text]
  • 563Rd RESCUE GROUP
    rd 563 RESCUE GROUP MISSION LINEAGE 3rd Emergency Rescue Squadron constituted, 14 Feb 1944 Activated, 15 Feb 1944 Redesignated 3rd Rescue Squadron, 28 Jan 1948 Redesignated 3rd Air Rescue Squadron, 10 Aug 1950 Redesignated 3rd Air Rescue Group, 14 Nov 1952 Inactivated, 18 Jun 1957 Redesignated 3rd Aerospace Rescue and Recovery Group, and activated, 14 Dec 1965 Organized, 8 Jan 1966 Inactivated, 31 Jan 1976 Redesignated 563rd Rescue Group, 29 Jul 2003 Activated, 1 Oct 2003 STATIONS Gulfport AAFld, MS, 15 Feb 1944 Keesler Field, MS, 1 Apr 1944; (ground echelon left on 18 May 1944 and arrived at Oakland AAB, CA, 20 May 1944 Brisbane, Australia, 17 Jun 1944; Oro Bay, New Guinea, 20 Jun 1944; Biak, 2 Sep 1944) (air echelon left Keesler Field on 5 Jul 1944 and arrived at Sacramento Air Depot, CA, 6 Jul 1944; Fairfield Suison AAF, CA, 15 Aug 1944. Brisbane, Australia, 1 Sep 1944; and joined ground echelon at Biak, 29 Sep 1944) Dulag, Leyte, Nov 1944 Tacloban, Leyte, 1 Apr 1945 Floridablanca, Luzon, 21 May 1945 Ie Shima, Japan, 15 Sep 1945 Atsugi, Japan, 6 Oct 1945 Nagoya, Japan, 17 Jun 1946 Yokota AB, Japan, 15 Jul 1947 Johnson AB, Japan, 1 Apr 1950 Nagoya AB (later, Nagoya Air Station; Moriyama Air Station), 9 Dec 1953-18 Jun 1957 Tan Son Nhut AB, South Vietnam, 8 Jan 1966 Nakhan Phanom RTAFB, Thailand, 15 Feb 1973 U-Tapao RTAFB, Thailand, 15 Sep 1975-31 Jan 1976 Davis Monthan AFB, AZ, 1 Oct 2003 ASSIGNMENTS Army Air Forces Training Command, 15 Feb 1944 AAF Eastern Technical Training Command, 4 Mar 1944 Thirteenth Air Force, 28 Jul 1944 Fifth
    [Show full text]