DOCSLIB.ORG

Profiles of Pentagon Spending by State Center

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PROFILES OF PENTAGON SPENDING BY STATE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA AS OF DECEMBER 2012 Contact: William D. Hartung Email: [email protected] Tel.: 917-923-3202 Note: These profiles were assembled by Natalie Peterson, Daniel Resnick, and William D. Hartung Profiles of Pentagon Spending by State December 2012 Alabama ......................................................................................... page 4 Alaska ............................................................................................ page 9 Arizona .......................................................................................... page 16 Arkansas ........................................................................................ page 22 California ....................................................................................... page 28 Colorado ....................................................................................... page 36 Connecticut ................................................................................... page 42 Delaware ....................................................................................... page 47 District of Columbia ...................................................................... page 52 Florida ........................................................................................... page 56 Georgia ......................................................................................... page 64 Hawaii ........................................................................................... page 68 Idaho ............................................................................................. page 74 Illinois ............................................................................................ page 77 Indiana .......................................................................................... page 82 Iowa .............................................................................................. page 89 Kansas ........................................................................................... page 92 Kentucky ....................................................................................... page 95 Louisiana ....................................................................................... page 99 Maine ............................................................................................ page 105 Maryland ....................................................................................... page 109 Massachusetts .............................................................................. page 116 Michigan ....................................................................................... page 124 Minnesota ..................................................................................... page 129 Mississippi ..................................................................................... page 135 Missouri ........................................................................................ page 140 Montana ....................................................................................... page 148 Nebraska ....................................................................................... page 152 Nevada .......................................................................................... page 155 New Hampshire ............................................................................ page 161 New Jersey .................................................................................... page 166 New Mexico .................................................................................. page 173 New York ....................................................................................... page 178 North Carolina .............................................................................. page 184 North Dakota ................................................................................ page 191 Ohio .............................................................................................. page 196 Oklahoma ...................................................................................... page 201 Oregon .......................................................................................... page 206 Pennsylvania ................................................................................. page 210 Rhode Island ................................................................................. page 215 South Carolina .............................................................................. page 221 South Dakota ................................................................................ page 225 Tennessee ..................................................................................... page 229 Texas ............................................................................................. page 235 Utah .............................................................................................. page 241 Vermont ........................................................................................ page 247 Virginia .......................................................................................... page 250 Washington .................................................................................... page 262 West Virginia ................................................................................. page 266 Wisconsin ...................................................................................... page 271 Wyoming ....................................................................................... page 275 ALABAMA SUMMARY: MILITARY SPENDING IN ALABAMA GENERAL Alabama is 10th in the country in Pentagon prime contract awards, receiving nearly $9 billion in FY2011. It is 8th in the country with $1,854.80 in contract awards per capita. Prime Pentagon spending accounted for 5.9% of Alabama’s overall GDP in 2011. MILITARY BASES 1) Redstone Arsenal (about 11,000 personnel) – Home to Army rocket and missile programs and components of Defense Intelligence Agency and Missile Defense Agency 2) Fort Rucker (about 11,000 personnel) – Home to the Army’s Aviation units (e.g., Center of Excellence, Technical Test Center) CONTRACTORS Boeing is the largest contractor in Alabama, employing around 2,500 employees at its Huntsville, AL location. This location is the headquarters for Boeing’s Strategic Missile & Defense Systems division, and key programs include work on a $3 billion Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) weapon system contract. The partnership of Army Fleet Support and L-3 Integrated Systems provides aviation maintenance and support for the Aviation Center Logistics Command and Fort Rucker’s tenants. It is based on Fort Rucker and employs 4,000. DETAILED PROFILE: MILITARY SPENDING IN ALABAMA ALABAMA MILITARY BASES 1- Redstone Arsenal - (11,457 total: 1,783 active duty and 9,674 civilians) Mission: • “For more than 40 years, Redstone has been the heart of the Army's rocket and missile programs.” • “’Team Redstone's’ mission is to perform basic and advanced weapons system research and development, placing the right missile and aviation systems with the troops, keeping them ready to fight, providing weapon systems, services and supplies to our allies, managing weapon systems such as the Cobra and PATRIOT, and supporting project managers within the program executive office structure.” • “Today, Redstone is home to the U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command (AMCOM), the Space and Missile Defense Command, numerous Program Executive Offices (PEO), and major components of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Missile Defense Agency. Also located here are numerous tenant and satellite organizations.” (Redstone) Community: • Located in the heart of the Tennessee Valley, in northern Alabama. • Total population served: 157,223 Soldiers (Active, retired, and dependents) and 27,620 civilians • “We have currently identified a net increase in positions associated for BRAC 2005 for Redstone Arsenal. While the actual numbers are still very subject to change, we currently estimate that the net increase will exceed 4000 personnel. This includes military, civilians and government contractors.” NOTE: BRAC stands for Base Realignment and Closure, a process under which an independent commission chooses a list of bases to be closed or scaled back and then Congress is required to vote the entire list up or down. This process is meant to prevent members from pushing to save bases in their states independently of the need for them. In this case it appears that Redstone is gaining personnel from another base that is being closed.. o It is estimated that BRAC will create an additional 5,000 indirect support jobs Redstone FAQ, Redstone Mission 2- Fort Rucker – (6,862: 4,460 active duty and 2,402 civilians) Mission: • Serves as the headquarters for the Army’s Aviation, including the Army’s Aviation Center of Excellence • “The U.S. Army Aviation Center of Excellence trains military, civilian, and international personnel in aviation and leadership skills, integrates Army aviation war fighting doctrine and requirements determination across the DOTMLPF (doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leadership and education, personnel and facilities), manages available resources, and sustains our commitment to the well-being of our Soldiers, civilians, retirees, and Families.” (Wikipedia) • “The US Army Aviation Technical Test Center is the only
Recommended publications
  • AT&L Workforce—Key Leadership Changes

    AT&L Workforce—Key Leadership Changes

    AT&L Workforce—Key Leadership Changes Air Force Test Center Welcomes Operations. Before that, he served at the 96th Test Wing at New Commanding General Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. 412TH TEST WING PUBLIC AFFAIRS (AUG. 3, 2018) Kenji Thuloweit Azzano graduated from the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School at EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif.—The world’s premier Edwards AFB in 2000 and later returned as the 412th Opera- flight test organization is in the hands of a new leader. Brig. tions Group commander. Gen. Christopher P. Azzano assumed command of the Air Force Test Center during a ceremony held Aug. 3 at Edwards Azzano has flown more than 2,900 hours in 35 aircraft types Air Force Base. Azzano takes the reins from Maj. Gen. David as an instructor pilot, evaluator pilot, and experimental test Harris, who has commanded the AFTC for the past three years. pilot. He has conducted developmental tests on a wide range of aircraft and weapons, and has commanded at the squadron, Gen. Ellen M. Pawlikowski, Air Force Materiel Command com- group and twice at the wing level. mander, presided over the ceremony. Following the change of command, the base held a retirement Azzano now directs an enterprise of more than 18,000 mili- ceremony for Harris, who is leaving the Air Force after more tary, civilian, and contractor personnel across Edwards AFB, than 31 years of service. Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, and Arnold Air Force Base in Tennessee. Summer Brings Many New Leaders to AFMC AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND PUBLIC AFFAIRS (AUG.
  • BLT 2/1 Returns from 11Th MEU WESTPAC Marines and Japanese Soldiers Kick Off Iron Fist 2015 Blue Diamond

    BLT 2/1 Returns from 11Th MEU WESTPAC Marines and Japanese Soldiers Kick Off Iron Fist 2015 Blue Diamond

    BLT 2/1 returns from 11th MEU WESTPAC MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. - Marines with the Battalion Landing Team 2nd Battalion, 1st Marine Regiment, 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit returned to Camp Pendleton, California, Feb 24. The 11th MEU completed a 7- month deployment to the U.S. 5th Fleet and 7th Fleet areas of operation. The 11th MEU, along with the Makin Island Amphibious Ready Group, deployed July 25 and participated in multiple exercises with regional host nations in both U.S. Pacific Command and U.S. Central Command, where the MEU served as a reserve force supporting contingency operations while also supporting Operation Inherent Resolve. Marines and Japanese soldiers kick off Iron Fist 2015 MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. – U.S. Marines with the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit stood alongside soldiers of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force’s Western Army Infantry Regiment to kick off Exercise Iron Fist 2015 during an opening ceremony aboard Camp Pendleton, Calif., Jan. 26, 2015. Exercise Iron Fist 2015 marks the 10th anniversary of the amphibious training partnership with the Japan Ground Self- Defense Force to enhance United States Marine Corps and JGSDF interoperability, develop the Self-Defense Force’s amphibious capabilities and build military-to-military relationships between the two forces. Click here to read more Blue Diamond: A 74-year legacy MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP PENDLETON, Calif. - Marines, sailors and veterans of the 1st Marine Division honored the division’s 74th anniversary during a battle colors rededication ceremony aboard Camp Pendleton, California, Jan. 22, 2015. Major Gen. Lawrence D.
  • December 1950

    December 1950

    7TH MARINE REGIMENT - HISTORICAL DIARY - AUGUST 1950 - DECEMBER 1950 Korean War Korean War Project Record: USMC-2281 CD: 22 United States Marine Corps History Division Quantico, Virginia Records: United States Marine Corps Unit Name: 1st Marine Division Records Group: RG 127 Depository: National Archives and Records Administration Location: College Park, Maryland Editor: Hal Barker Korean War Project P.O. Box 180190 Dallas, TX 75218-0190 http://www.koreanwar.org Korean War Project USMC-08300001 DECLASSIFIED - I 0680/946 Al2 Ser _Q.056-5.t FEB 21 1951 FIRST ENDORSEMENT on CG, lstMarDiv 1 tr to CMC, aer 0021-51 of 8 Feb 1961 From: Commanding General, Fleet Marine Force, Pacific To: Commandant of the Marine Corps SubJ: Historical Diaries, 7th Marines; period August - November 1950 1. Forwarded. .1.0()()';'8 c/e~~.... J. C. BURGER COLONEL, U. S. MARINE CORPS Copy to: CHIEF OF STAFF ' CG, lstMarDi v • ....... - DECLASSIFIED Korean War Project USMC-08300002 DECLASSIFIED pi;~ ~-. :._- ·-:::::~~--"'""'~--:;;·;-:p;...ii.,-:-_*jil"'·--....-=- .... ----!,.o.l-.,--~-. I'll 41-1/ldJ Ser 058-51 28 "ebru<>ry 19 51 FIRST ::::nc·::!S:'].!El!T on 7thl4ar Historical Diary for December 1950, ltr ser 505 of 17 Feb 1951 From: Comr.~anding Gener:cl, lst Marine Division, FMF To: Commsnde_nt of the Marine Corps Yia: Comm<e.n•3.ing Generr\l, Fleet Marine Force, Pacific Saoj: His toricc.l DiarJ' for Decenber 1950 2. Tl1e secu:·ity classification o:' this e:ldorsement is rell!ovecl ,.r~1ea tetc.ched :"rom the bEtsic le~ter. ~~- H. S. \;'.~SETH De~>ut;r Chief of Staff far Administration :'.,.• '•.
  • Samurai Gate Annual Dec. 18 2015

    Samurai Gate Annual Dec. 18 2015

    2 SAMURAI GATE 2015 ANNUAL 18th Wing Commander wishes Team Kadena Happy Holidays eam Kadena, Th e holidays are a great time of year you demonstrate, a dedication to As we welcome this holiday for you to take the time to relax, unwind freedom so profound that you are Tseason, I would like to thank and spend time with friends and willing to give of yourself to defend the every Airman, Marine, Soldier, Sailor, family as we continue to serve in the freedoms of others, both near and afar. Civilian and family member for the world’s greatest fi ghting force. We must So I would like to thank you on sacrifi ces you make each day for our remember to take care of our wingmen, behalf of myself, my family, your fellow country and your dedication to peace especially on Okinawa, where many of service men and women, and our great and stability in the Pacifi c. Together, we our fellow service men and women may nation. Please enjoy this holiday season, make up an essential force in support be spending the holidays away from be smart, and stay safe. of the United States’ commitments in their families for the fi rst time. Best wishes from my family to yours the Pacifi c region as well as the mutual Sacrifi ces such as these are a true throughout the holidays and into the Brig. Gen. Barry R. Cornish defense of Japan. testament to the strength of character New Year! 18th Wing Commander Cover Wing commander add- photo resses Team Kadena An F-15C Eagle from Kadena Air Base, refuels By Airman 1st Class from a 909th Air Refueling Corey M.
  • Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis]

    Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis]

    Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis] Preface Commander’s Foreword 2 The History of Davis-Monthan AFB 3 Economic Impact Tables Table 1 – Executive Summary 4 Table 2-3 – Total Personnel / Annual Payroll by Classification and 5 Housing Location Table 4-5 – Total Civilian Personnel / Payroll by Appropriated and 6 Non-Appropriated Funds Table 6 – Expense Report 7 Table 7-8 – Indirect Jobs Created / Tucson Retiree Data 8 Table 9 – Economic Impact Estimate 9 Economic Impact Charts Chart 1 – Annual Economic Impact Estimates (w/o retirees) 9 Chart 2-3 – Appropriated Funds Military Payroll / Assigned 10 Chart 4-5 – Appropriated Funds Civilian Payroll / Military Retiree 11 Payments Chart 6-7 – Annual Estimated Jobs Created ($M / # Jobs) 12 1 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base [Economic Impact Analysis] 2016 PREFACE Commander’s Foreword Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (D-M AFB) is pleased to present its Economic Impact Analysis for Fiscal Year 2016. The Wing’s mission is clear: Deploy, employ, support, and sustain attack airpower in support of Combatant Commanders anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice; train the finest attack pilots for the Combat Air Forces; provide every member of Team D-M with responsive, tailored, mission-focused base support. The Wing’s vision is resolute: A premier Fighter Wing comprised of resilient Airmen, armed with precise tools and training; powered by a culture of leadership and innovation; prepared to provide responsive combat airpower which exceeds Combatant Command expectations for excellence. Members of D-M AFB live, work, and educate their children in the Tucson area.
  • Air & Space Power Journal

    Air & Space Power Journal

    July–August 2013 Volume 27, No. 4 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective The Air Advisor ❙ 4 The Face of US Air Force Engagement Maj Gen Timothy M. Zadalis, USAF Features The Swarm, the Cloud, and the Importance of Getting There First ❙ 14 What’s at Stake in the Remote Aviation Culture Debate Maj David J. Blair, USAF Capt Nick Helms, USAF The Next Lightweight Fighter ❙ 39 Not Your Grandfather’s Combat Aircraft Col Michael W. Pietrucha, USAF Building Partnership Capacity by Using MQ-9s in the Asia-Pacific ❙ 59 Col Andrew A. Torelli, USAF Personnel Security during Joint Operations with Foreign Military Forces ❙ 79 David C. Aykens Departments 101 ❙ Views The Glass Ceiling for Remotely Piloted Aircraft ❙ 101 Lt Col Lawrence Spinetta, PhD, USAF Funding Cyberspace: The Case for an Air Force Venture Capital Initiative ❙ 119 Maj Chadwick M. Steipp, USAF Strategic Distraction: The Consequence of Neglecting Organizational Design ❙ 129 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF 140 ❙ Book Reviews Master of the Air: William Tunner and the Success of Military Airlift . 140 Robert A. Slayton Reviewer: Frank Kalesnik, PhD Selling Air Power: Military Aviation and American Popular Culture after World War II . 142 Steve Call Reviewer: Scott D. Murdock From Lexington to Baghdad and Beyond: War and Politics in the American Experience, 3rd ed . 144 Donald M. Snow and Dennis M. Drew Reviewer: Capt Chris Sanders, USAF Beer, Bacon, and Bullets: Culture in Coalition Warfare from Gallipoli to Iraq . 147 Gal Luft Reviewer: Col Chad T. Manske, USAF Global Air Power . 149 John Andreas Olsen, editor Reviewer: Lt Col P.
  • 2021-2 Bio Book

    2021-2 Bio Book

    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Keystone Class 2021-2 7-18 June 2021 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Lieutenant General Mike Plehn is the 17th President of the National Defense University. As President of NDU, he oversees its five component colleges that offer graduate-level degrees and certifications in joint professional military education to over 2,000 U.S. military officers, civilian government officials, international military officers and industry partners annually. Raised in an Army family, he graduated from Miami Southridge Senior High School in 1983 and attended the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy with Military Distinction and a degree in Astronautical Engineering in 1988. He is a Distinguished Graduate of Squadron Officer School as well as the College of Naval Command and Staff, where he received a Master’s Degree with Highest Distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies. He also holds a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Airpower Studies, as well as a Master of Aerospace Science degree from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Lt Gen Plehn has extensive experience in joint, interagency, and special operations, including: Middle East Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, and four tours at the Combatant Command level to include U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, and twice at U.S. Southern Command, where he was most recently the Military Deputy Commander. He also served on the Air Staff in Strategy and Policy and as the speechwriter to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
  • W Vietnam Service Report

    W Vietnam Service Report

    Honoring Our Vietnam War and Vietnam Era Veterans February 28, 1961 - May 7, 1975 Town of West Seneca, New York Name: WAILAND Hometown: CHEEKTOWAGA FRANK J. Address: Vietnam Era Vietnam War Veteran Year Entered: 1968 Service Branch:ARMY Rank: SP-5 Year Discharged: 1971 Unit / Squadron: 1ST INFANTRY DIVISION 1ST ENGINEER BATTALION Medals / Citations: NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE RIBBON VIETNAM SERVICE MEDAL VIETNAM CAMPAIGN MEDAL WITH '60 DEVICE ARMY COMMENDATION MEDAL 2 OVERSEAS SERVICE BARS SHARPSHOOTER BADGE: M-16 RIFLE EXPERT BADGE: M-14 RIFLE Served in War Zone Theater of Operations / Assignment: VIETNAM Service Notes: Base Assignments: Fort Belvoir, Virginia - The base was founded during World War I as Camp A. A. Humphreys, named for Union Civil War general Andrew A. Humphreys, who was also Chief of Engineers / The post was renamed Fort Belvoir in the 1930s in recognition of the Belvoir plantation that once occupied the site, but the adjacent United States Army Corps of Engineers Humphreys Engineer Center retains part of the original name / Fort Belvoir was initially the home of the Army Engineer School prior to its relocation in the 1980s to Fort Leonard Wood, in Missouri / Fort Belvoir serves as the headquarters for the Defense Logistics Agency, the Defense Acquisition University, the Defense Contract Audit Agency, the Defense Technical Information Center, the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command, the United States Army Military Intelligence Readiness Command, the Missile Defense Agency, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, all agencies of the United States Department of Defense Lai Khe, Vietnam - Also known as Lai Khê Base, Lai Khe was a former Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN) and U.S.
  • Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress

    Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress

    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This report is part of the RAND Corporation research report series. RAND reports present research findings and objective analysis that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND reports undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Research Report Assessment of the Air Force Materiel Command Reorganization Report for Congress Don Snyder, Bernard Fox, Kristin F.
  • Air and Space Power Journal: Fall 2011

    Air and Space Power Journal: Fall 2011

    Fall 2011 Volume XXV, No. 3 AFRP 10-1 From the Editor Personnel Recovery in Focus ❙ 6 Lt Col David H. Sanchez, Deputy Chief, Professional Journals Capt Wm. Howard, Editor Senior Leader Perspective Air Force Personnel Recovery as a Service Core Function ❙ 7 It’s Not “Your Father’s Combat Search and Rescue” Brig Gen Kenneth E. Todorov, USAF Col Glenn H. Hecht, USAF Features Air Force Rescue ❙ 16 A Multirole Force for a Complex World Col Jason L. Hanover, USAF Department of Defense (DOD) Directive 3002.01E, Personnel Recovery in the Department of Defense, highlights personnel recovery (PR) as one of the DOD’s highest priorities. As an Air Force core function, PR has experienced tremendous success, having performed 9,000 joint/multinational combat saves in the last two years and having flown a total of 15,750 sorties since 11 September 2001. Despite this admirable record, the author contends that the declining readiness of aircraft and equipment as well as chronic staffing shortages prevents Air Force rescue from meeting the requirements of combatant commanders around the globe. To halt rescue’s decline, a numbered Air Force must represent this core function, there- by ensuring strong advocacy and adequate resources for this lifesaving, DOD-mandated function. Strategic Rescue ❙ 26 Vectoring Airpower Advocates to Embrace the Real Value of Personnel Recovery Maj Chad Sterr, USAF The Air Force rescue community has expanded beyond its traditional image of rescuing downed air- crews to encompass a much larger set of capabilities and competencies that have strategic impact on US operations around the world.
  • Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The

    Each Cadet Squadron Is Sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below Is The

    Each Cadet Squadron is sponsored by an Active Duty Unit. Below is the listing for the Cadet Squadron and the Sponsor Unit CS SPONSOR WING BASE MAJCOM 1 1st Fighter Wing 1 FW Langley AFB VA ACC 2 388th Fighter Wing 388 FW Hill AFB UT ACC 3 60th Air Mobility Wing 60 AMW Travis AFB CA AMC 4 15th Wing 15 WG Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam PACAF 5 12th Flying Training Wing 12 FTW Randolph AFB TX AETC 6 4th Fighter Wing 4 FW Seymour Johonson AFB NC ACC 7 49th Fighter Wing 49 FW Holloman AFB NM ACC 8 46th Test Wing 46 TW Eglin AFB FL AFMC 9 23rd Wing 23 WG Moody AFB GA ACC 10 56th Fighter Wing 56 FW Luke AFB AZ AETC 11 55th Wing AND 11th Wing 55WG AND 11WG Offutt AFB NE AND Andrews AFB ACC 12 325th Fighter Wing 325 FW Tyndall AFB FL AETC 13 92nd Air Refueling Wing 92 ARW Fairchild AFB WA AMC 14 412th Test Wing 412 TW Edwards AFB CA AFMC 15 355th Fighter Wing 375 AMW Scott AFB IL AMC 16 89th Airlift Wing 89 AW Andrews AFB MD AMC 17 437th Airlift Wing 437 AW Charleston AFB SC AMC 18 314th Airlift Wing 314 AW Little Rock AFB AR AETC 19 19th Airlift Wing 19 AW Little Rock AFB AR AMC 20 20th Fighter Wing 20 FW Shaw AFB SC ACC 21 366th Fighter Wing AND 439 AW 366 FW Mountain Home AFB ID AND Westover ARB ACC/AFRC 22 22nd Air Refueling Wing 22 ARW McConnell AFB KS AMC 23 305th Air Mobility Wing 305 AMW McGuire AFB NJ AMC 24 375th Air Mobility Wing 355 FW Davis-Monthan AFB AZ ACC 25 432nd Wing 432 WG Creech AFB ACC 26 57th Wing 57 WG Nellis AFB NV ACC 27 1st Special Operations Wing 1 SOW Hurlburt Field FL AFSOC 28 96th Air Base Wing AND 434th ARW 96 ABW
  • Best Practices Study 2014

    Best Practices Study 2014

    Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ..............................................................................................................................