DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Practices Study 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best Practices Study 2014 Military Installation and Mission Support Best Practices (25 States / 20 Communities) Prepared for: Florida Defense Support Task Force (FDSTF) Submitted: December 23, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... iii BEST PRACTICES REPORT Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 1 States/ Communities ........................................................................................................... 1 Project Participants ............................................................................................................. 2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 2 Sources ................................................................................................................................ 3 Findings ............................................................................................................................... 4 STATES 1. Florida .............................................................................................................................. 18 2. Alabama ............................................................................................................................ 26 3. Alaska ............................................................................................................................... 32 4. Arizona .............................................................................................................................. 38 5. California .......................................................................................................................... 45 6. Colorado ............................................................................................................................ 54 7. Connecticut ....................................................................................................................... 61 8. Georgia .............................................................................................................................. 67 9. Hawaii ............................................................................................................................... 74 10. Illinois ............................................................................................................................... 80 11. Kansas ............................................................................................................................... 87 12. Kentucky ........................................................................................................................... 93 13. Louisiana ........................................................................................................................... 98 14. Maryland ......................................................................................................................... 104 15. Mississippi ...................................................................................................................... 111 16. Missouri .......................................................................................................................... 117 17. Nevada ............................................................................................................................ 122 18. New Jersey ...................................................................................................................... 128 19. New Mexico .................................................................................................................... 134 20. New York ........................................................................................................................ 140 21. North Carolina ................................................................................................................ 146 22. Oklahoma ........................................................................................................................ 152 23. South Carolina ................................................................................................................ 158 24. Texas ............................................................................................................................... 164 25. Virginia ........................................................................................................................... 173 26. Washington ..................................................................................................................... 181 COMMUNITIES i 1. San Antonio, TX ............................................................................................................. 187 2. Clovis, NM ...................................................................................................................... 193 3. Hampton Roads, VA ....................................................................................................... 197 4. San Diego, CA ................................................................................................................ 205 5. Fayetteville, NC .............................................................................................................. 212 6. Huntsville, AL ................................................................................................................. 217 7. Dayton, OH ..................................................................................................................... 220 8. Monterey, CA ................................................................................................................. 224 9. Watertown, NY ............................................................................................................... 228 10. Lancaster, CA ................................................................................................................. 233 11. Bremerton, WA ............................................................................................................... 237 12. Whidbey Island/ Oak Harbor, WA ................................................................................. 241 13. Phoenix/ Glendale, AZ .................................................................................................... 244 14. Colorado Springs, CO ..................................................................................................... 251 15. Bellville, IL ..................................................................................................................... 257 16. Daleville, Enterprise, Ozark, AL .................................................................................... 260 17. Oklahoma City, OK ........................................................................................................ 264 18. Burlington, VT ................................................................................................................ 269 19. Tucson, AZ ..................................................................................................................... 273 20. China Lake/ Ridgecrest, CA ........................................................................................... 279 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to describe the “Best Practices” being utilized by 25 separate states, and a total of 20 communities throughout the country to protect, sustain, and enhance their resident military installations and missions. Specifically, the project entailed researching, identifying and reporting on: • Initiatives/programs implemented by these states and local communities/organizations to sustain and/or enhance their resident military installations and missions. • Relevant state statutes and local regulations which support the military installations, missions and military families. In the study of the 25 states, several factors were analyzed to determine the states’ progress since the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round of 2005. Additionally, an assessment was completed of the contributions that the states have made to assigned military personnel and their families, as well as the veterans residing in the states. The specific factors analyzed consisted of the following: • The overall state employment impact resulting from the BRAC 2005 process as reported in the Commission’s Report to the President (Volume 2). • Military Construction (Milcon) investments made by the DoD and the Congress post BRAC 2005 (from 2006 through 2015) as an indication of mission stability and growth. • An indication of total DoD expenditures in the state, as of 2011, and the amount of the state’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) represented by these expenditures. • Compliance with the 10 Key Issues of the USA4MilitaryFamilies initiative that the DoD and states have partnered on to support the needs of military members and their families. • The State Report Card (2013) published by the Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) providing a state-by-state assessment of state-level programs and policies affecting active duty, military retirees, veterans, and family members. • Legislative initiatives passed by state legislatures to support Active Duty, Guard and Reserve, military retirees, veterans, and family members from 2010 – 2014. • Best Practices employed by states to support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Peterson Transitions to Privatized Housing by Corey Dahl Have Certain Expectations for Amenities That Space Observer These Houses Currently Lack
    COMMANDER’S CORNER: AMAZING EVENTS OF LAST WEEK – PAGE 3 Peterson Air Force Base, Colorado Thursday, September 27, 2007 Vol. 51 No. 26 Peterson transitions to privatized housing By Corey Dahl have certain expectations for amenities that Space Observer these houses currently lack. Now we’ll be Officials here handed over control of base able to provide them.” housing to a private developer this month, Families on base are eager for the changes. the first step in a process that will eventu- Airmen were required to sign new leases ally bring new homes to both Peterson and this summer if they wished to stay in family Schriever. housing, and, according to Bob Mathis, vice Private developer Actus Lend Lease president with Actus, the number of people closed on a $321 million privatization ini- who opted to stay exceeded expectations. tiative for Peterson, Schriever and Los “I had a couple of people tell me they were Angeles Air Force Bases Sept. 20. Actus – op- going to use the opportunity to move off erating under the name Tierra Vista base, buy a house downtown or something,” Communities – will now manage base he said. “But we’re actually at a higher rate housing here and receive servicemembers’ of occupancy than we expected.” base housing allowances each month. And, while families might not see any The transfer of authority also clears the shovels in the ground until April, Mr. way for Actus to begin replacing Peterson’s Mathis said residents can still expect to see 493 homes with 597 new ones and start major changes now that Actus has taken building 242 new homes on Schriever, over.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Arizona's Principal Military Operations
    Economic Impact Of Arizona’s Principal Military Operations 2008 Prepared by In collaboration with Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND STUDY 1 METHODOLOGY Chapter Two DESCRIPTIONS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 11 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Three EMPLOYMENT AND SPENDING AT ARIZONA’S 27 PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Four ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 32 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Five STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM 36 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Six COMPARISONS TO THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN 38 ARIZONA Chapter Seven COMPARISONS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN FY 43 2000 AND FY 2005 APPENDICES Appendix One HOW IMPLAN WORKS A-1 Appendix Two RETIREE METHODOLOGY A-6 Appendix Three ECONOMETRIC MODEL INPUTS A-7 Appendix Four DETAILED STATEWIDE MODEL OUTPUT A-19 Appendix Five REGIONAL IMPACT INFORMATION A-22 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1 Summary of Basic Personnel Statistics 27 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-2 Summary of Military Retiree Statistics 28 Arizona Principal Military Operations Table 3-3 Summary of Payroll and Retirement Benefits 30 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-4 Summary of Spending Statistics 31 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 4-1 Summary of Statewide Economic Impacts 34 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 5-1 Summary of Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 5-2 Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 6-1 Comparison of Major Industries / Employers in Arizona 41 Table 7-1 Comparison of Military Industry Employment in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 Table 7-2 Comparison of Military Industry Economic Output in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation Arizona’s Principal Military Operations Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge and thank the leadership and personnel of the various military operations included within this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Base San Antonio JLUS RJIS
    One Team, One Mission: Your Success! Joint Base San Antonio JLUS RJIS Ray Garza C.M. JLUS Project Manager April 12, 2017 Joint Base San Antonio: The Premier Installation in the Department of Defense! RJIS AGENDA • Welcome & Introductions of Regional Stakeholders • Announcement of Prestigious 2017 Awards • Great American Defense Community • AETC’s ALTUS Trophy • JBSA Overview and JLUS Strategy • Regional Joint Land Use Implementation Strategy (RJIS) JLUS’s & OEA Grant • RJIS Task Force Goals and Key Priorities • Adjourn! Thank you Joint Basing 101 One Team, One Mission: Your Success! Joint Basing Initiative got started as part of the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC), 2005 . Realigned 26 geographically proximate bases into 12 joint bases Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) was established in 2009 Aims of Joint Basing Reduce duplication Consolidate service Improve facility of effort… contracts… utilization… Achieve efficiency Optimize support Develop best practices Joint Base San Antonio: The Premier Installation in the Department of Defense! JBSA One Team, One Mission: Your Success! Where we are CoSA Fiscal 2.3 B What our impact is 502d Air $15.5B Economic Impact Base Wing to the San Antonio Region 266 Interface Missions with Numerous Civic leaders Encompassing… 35 M ft2 11 Separate Facilities Locations 27 Communities Counties $37B 382,000 7 +46,500 Acres Physical Plant Total Population Congressional Districts Replacement 6 4 of 23 Joint Base San Antonio: The Premier Installation in the Department of Defense! JBSA High Pass One Team, One
    [Show full text]
  • Militaryinstallations - U.S
    MilitaryINSTALLATIONS - U.S. Department of Defense 10/7/18 MilitaryInstallations Booklet for Joint Base San Antonio (Lackland Randolph Sam Houston) Fast Facts Location: Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) is situated in San Antonio, (Bexar County), the seventh largest city and known as "Military City USA." Encompassing JBSA are Fort Sam Houston, Lackland Air Force Base and Randolph Air Force Base, three separate installations. Fort Sam Houston's primary mission is medical training and support and is home to Brooke Army Medical Center. See Fort Sam Houston homepage. The primary mission at Lackland AFB is training: basic military, technical, English language and technical training in Spanish to allied countries. See Joint Base San Antonio Homepage. Randolph AFB is located northeast of the city and houses several headquarters including Air Education & Training Command (AETC), Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC), and Air Force Headquarters Recruiting Services. See Joint Base San Antonio Homepage. Cost of Living: The cost of living remains around 90, below the national average of 100 for major U.S. cities. BRAC Status: BRAC 2005 recommended (172 Med 10) the consolidation of all inpatient and Level-One trauma care from Wilford Hall Medical Center (WHMC) and Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC) into one medical region with two integrated campuses known as San Antonio Military Medical Center (SAMMC). Brooke Army Medical Center is now an inpatient tertiary care center providing all inpatient care as well as all trauma and emergency medical care, now referred to as SAMMC. Wilford Hall Medical Center was converted into a large ambulatory care center, called Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center (WHASC).
    [Show full text]
  • BMT Prepares for New Training Complex, P12-13 Countdown
    A PUBLICATION OF THE 502nd AIR BASE WING JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS • www.lackland.af.mil • Vol. 69 No. 7 • FEBRUARY 17, 2012 Keep it clean Cell phones a vector for spreading germs, Making progress P2 IAAFA milestone Schoolhouse for Latin American students consolidates training, P3 Budget crunch Air Force faces fiscal challenges in FY13, P6 Military Saves AFRC promotes financial fitness, P9 UCI Photo by Alan Boedeker 17 Contract employees working to finish the 37th Training Wing’s new Airman Training Complex No. 1 prepare suspension wire for ceiling tile Feb. 7 at the DAYS UNTIL THE Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland construction site. ATC No. 1 is tentatively scheduled for completion later this summer. JBSA-LACKLAND INSPECTION BMT prepares for new training complex, P12-13 COUNTDOWN INSIDE | Commentary 2 News 3 Feature 12-13 Community Briefs 17 What’s Happening 18 Sports 19-20 PAGE 2 commentary TALESPINNER February 17, 2012 Cell phones Joint Base San Antonio Lackland Editorial Staff ‘Communicable’ in more ways than one BRIG . GEN . THERESA C. CAR T ER , COMMANDER By Staff Sgt. Dinah LaDuke OS C AR BALLADARES , 59th Medical Wing DIRE C TOR OF PUBLI C AFFAIRS hen was the last time JO E BELA , CHIEF , you sanitized your INTERNAL COMMUNI C ATIONS W 671-4111 phone? We wash our hands to help prevent the spread MANAGING EDITOR , VA C ANT of germs and illnesses, but cell phones carry viruses and MIKE JO SEPH , bacteria, too, and we take our SENIOR WRITER , 671-4357 phones just about everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis]
    Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis] Preface Commander’s Foreword 2 The History of Davis-Monthan AFB 3 Economic Impact Tables Table 1 – Executive Summary 4 Table 2-3 – Total Personnel / Annual Payroll by Classification and 5 Housing Location Table 4-5 – Total Civilian Personnel / Payroll by Appropriated and 6 Non-Appropriated Funds Table 6 – Expense Report 7 Table 7-8 – Indirect Jobs Created / Tucson Retiree Data 8 Table 9 – Economic Impact Estimate 9 Economic Impact Charts Chart 1 – Annual Economic Impact Estimates (w/o retirees) 9 Chart 2-3 – Appropriated Funds Military Payroll / Assigned 10 Chart 4-5 – Appropriated Funds Civilian Payroll / Military Retiree 11 Payments Chart 6-7 – Annual Estimated Jobs Created ($M / # Jobs) 12 1 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base [Economic Impact Analysis] 2016 PREFACE Commander’s Foreword Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (D-M AFB) is pleased to present its Economic Impact Analysis for Fiscal Year 2016. The Wing’s mission is clear: Deploy, employ, support, and sustain attack airpower in support of Combatant Commanders anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice; train the finest attack pilots for the Combat Air Forces; provide every member of Team D-M with responsive, tailored, mission-focused base support. The Wing’s vision is resolute: A premier Fighter Wing comprised of resilient Airmen, armed with precise tools and training; powered by a culture of leadership and innovation; prepared to provide responsive combat airpower which exceeds Combatant Command expectations for excellence. Members of D-M AFB live, work, and educate their children in the Tucson area.
    [Show full text]
  • 50Th Space Wing Col
    COLORADO SPRING S MILITARY NEW S PAPER GROUP Thursday, May 28, 2009 www.csmng.com Vol. 3 No. 21 Base Briefs 60th anniversary time change 50th Space Wing Col. Cary Chun, 50th Space Wing commander, will commemorate the wing’s 60th Anniversary at 2 p.m. June A proud heritage 1 in the building 210 atrium with a cake cutting and refreshments. All are invited. Please note this is a new time for the event. For more information, contact Randolph Saunders at 567-6877 or at [email protected]. Duathlon registration Register by June 10 for the annual Schriever AFB Duathlon. The duathlon is scheduled for June 12, and consists of a 1 mile run, a 10 mile bike ride, followed by another 1 mile run. Courtesy photo Participants must register at the Main During it’s time at Hahn Air Base, Germany, the 50th Fighter-Bomber Wing converted older aircraft like the F-86 to newer designs like the F-4. The wing’s crews also Fitness Center and report at the start/fin- converted to the F-100 and F-104. ish line on the event day by 7:45 a.m. For more information, contact Seth Cannello Commentary by Randy Saunders ate unit and stationed at Otis AFB, Mass., the F-51 aircraft. By July 1953, the wing had com- at 567-6628. 50th Space Wing historian 50th Fighter Wing conducted crew training and pleted its training requirements. In response The 50th Space Wing celebrates its 60th an- participated in various exercises in the North to increasing concerns about the Soviet mili- Intramural softball niversary June 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SATCOM for Net-Centric Warfare — October 2017 Milsatmagazine
    SATCOM For Net-Centric Warfare — October 2017 MilsatMagazine Military Space 2.0 Meeting SATCOM Mobility & Connectivity Demands Flat Panel Antennas The Dawning of a New Supply Chain The HPA Corner: Catching the Wave The Coming Satellite Cyber Crisis Planning for Space Flexibility Government & Commercial Collaboration Satellite, Not Walls, Secure Borders ORS-5 launches aboard a Minotaur IV rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida — Photo is courtesy of James Murati. Publishing OPeratiOns seniOr COntributOrs authOrs Silvano Payne, Publisher + Senior Writer Simon Davies, Spectra Doug Campbell Hartley G. Lesser, Editorial Director Tony Bardo, Hughes Simon Davies Ryan Johnson Pattie Waldt, Executive Editor Richard Dutchik, Dutchik Comm. Chris Forrester, Broadgate Publications Hayley McGuire Jill Durfee, Sales Director, Associate Editor Karl Fuchs, iDirect Government Services John Monahan Simon Payne, Development Director Dr. Rowan Gilmore, EM Solutions Ulf Sandberg Donald McGee, Production Manager Bob Gough, Carrick Communications Staff Sgt. Christie Smith Dan Makinster, Technical Advisor Ryan Schradin, SES GS Mike Sweeney Koen Willems, Newtec Airman Kylee Thomas Dr. Yifan Wang table Of COntents advertiser index ULA Lights Up the Night with NROL-42 Launch ........................................5 ACORDE Technologies .............................................................................23 U.S.A.F.’s ORS-5 Satellite Launches Via Orbital ATK’s Minotaur IV ..........6 Advantech Wireless ....................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-2 Bio Book
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Keystone Class 2021-2 7-18 June 2021 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Lieutenant General Mike Plehn is the 17th President of the National Defense University. As President of NDU, he oversees its five component colleges that offer graduate-level degrees and certifications in joint professional military education to over 2,000 U.S. military officers, civilian government officials, international military officers and industry partners annually. Raised in an Army family, he graduated from Miami Southridge Senior High School in 1983 and attended the U.S. Air Force Academy Preparatory School in Colorado Springs, Colorado. He graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy with Military Distinction and a degree in Astronautical Engineering in 1988. He is a Distinguished Graduate of Squadron Officer School as well as the College of Naval Command and Staff, where he received a Master’s Degree with Highest Distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies. He also holds a Master of Airpower Art and Science degree from the School of Advanced Airpower Studies, as well as a Master of Aerospace Science degree from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. Lt Gen Plehn has extensive experience in joint, interagency, and special operations, including: Middle East Policy in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, and four tours at the Combatant Command level to include U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, and twice at U.S. Southern Command, where he was most recently the Military Deputy Commander. He also served on the Air Staff in Strategy and Policy and as the speechwriter to the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Premises, Sites Etc Within 30 Miles of Harrington Museum Used for Military Purposes in the 20Th Century
    Premises, Sites etc within 30 miles of Harrington Museum used for Military Purposes in the 20th Century The following listing attempts to identify those premises and sites that were used for military purposes during the 20th Century. The listing is very much a works in progress document so if you are aware of any other sites or premises within 30 miles of Harrington, Northamptonshire, then we would very much appreciate receiving details of them. Similarly if you spot any errors, or have further information on those premises/sites that are listed then we would be pleased to hear from you. Please use the reporting sheets at the end of this document and send or email to the Carpetbagger Aviation Museum, Sunnyvale Farm, Harrington, Northampton, NN6 9PF, [email protected] We hope that you find this document of interest. Village/ Town Name of Location / Address Distance to Period used Use Premises Museum Abthorpe SP 646 464 34.8 km World War 2 ANTI AIRCRAFT SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY Northamptonshire The site of a World War II searchlight battery. The site is known to have had a generator and Nissen huts. It was probably constructed between 1939 and 1945 but the site had been destroyed by the time of the Defence of Britain survey. Ailsworth Manor House Cambridgeshire World War 2 HOME GUARD STORE A Company of the 2nd (Peterborough) Battalion Northamptonshire Home Guard used two rooms and a cellar for a company store at the Manor House at Ailsworth Alconbury RAF Alconbury TL 211 767 44.3 km 1938 - 1995 AIRFIELD Huntingdonshire It was previously named 'RAF Abbots Ripton' from 1938 to 9 September 1942 while under RAF Bomber Command control.
    [Show full text]
  • Cradle of Airpower Education
    Cradle of Airpower Education Maxwell Air Force Base Centennial April 1918 – April 2018 A Short History of The Air University, Maxwell AFB, and the 42nd Air Base Wing Air University Directorate of History March 2019 1 2 Cradle of Airpower Education A Short History of The Air University, Maxwell AFB, and 42nd Air Base Wing THE INTELLECTUAL AND LEADERSHIP- DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF THE US AIR FORCE Air University Directorate of History Table of Contents Origins and Early Development 3 The Air Corps Tactical School Period 3 Maxwell Field during World War II 4 Early Years of Air University 6 Air University during the Vietnam War 7 Air University after the Vietnam War 7 Air University in the Post-Cold War Era 8 Chronology of Key Events 11 Air University Commanders and Presidents 16 Maxwell Post/Base Commanders 17 Lineage and Honors: Air University 20 Lineage and Honors: 42nd Bombardment Wing 21 “Be the intellectual and leadership-development center of the Air Force Develop leaders, enrich minds, advance airpower, build relationships, and inspire service.” 3 Origins and Early Development The history of Maxwell Air Force Base began with Orville and Wilbur Wright, who, following their 1903 historic flight, decided in early 1910 to open a flying school to teach people how to fly and to promote the sale of their airplane. After looking at locations in Florida, Wilbur came to Montgomery, Alabama in February 1910 and decided to open the nation’s first civilian flying school on an old cotton plantation near Montgomery that subsequently become Maxwell Air Force Base (AFB).
    [Show full text]