DOCSLIB.ORG

Design Development Standards January 2019 Revision History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Design Development Standards January 2019 Revision History Design Development Standards January 2019 Revision History Revision Revision date Details 1.0 2.25.2019 DRAFT Design Development Standards 2019 Version 1.0 Contents 1.0 General ........................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Climate and Environmental Conditions .................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 System Technology Description ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Codes and Standards ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 Operations............................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 General .................................................................................................................................................................................11 2.2 Safety & Security .............................................................................................................................................................11 3.0 Track Alignment and Clearance ........................................................................................................ 12 3.1 Track Alignment ................................................................................................................................................................12 3.2 Clearance Requirements ..............................................................................................................................................13 4.0 Urban Design - Streetcar Stops ....................................................................................................... 14 4.1 Preferred Siting Criteria ................................................................................................................................................14 4.2 Streetcar Platforms ........................................................................................................................................................15 4.3 Streetcar Platform Design Parameters ..................................................................................................................15 4.4 Streetcar Platform Amenities .....................................................................................................................................16 4.5 Integration of Public Art ................................................................................................................................................18 4.6 Portland Streetcar Sponsorship Program ............................................................................................................19 5.0 Civil Work ................................................................................................................................................. 20 5.1 Survey Control System ..................................................................................................................................................20 5.2 Drainage ..............................................................................................................................................................................20 5.3 Right-of-Way ......................................................................................................................................................................21 5.4 Roadways ............................................................................................................................................................................21 6.0 Urban Design - R.O.W. and Alignment ............................................................................................. 22 6.1 Integrating Related Improvements ...........................................................................................................................22 6.2 Streetscape Development Strategies ....................................................................................................................22 6.3 Bicycle/Pedestrian/Streetcar Interfaces ..............................................................................................................23 7.0 Utilities ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 7.1 Preconstruction ................................................................................................................................................................24 7.2 Private Utilities ..................................................................................................................................................................25 7.3 Public Utilities ....................................................................................................................................................................25 7.4 Street Lights and Tra c Signals ................................................................................................................................26 7.5 Parking Meters ..................................................................................................................................................................26 7.6 Vaults and Basement Encroachments ....................................................................................................................27 7.7 Overhead Utility Lines ....................................................................................................................................................28 7.8 Temporary Support of Track Slab .............................................................................................................................28 8.0 TraƱ c ........................................................................................................................................................ 29 8.1 Applicable Codes .............................................................................................................................................................29 8.2 General Design Criteria .................................................................................................................................................29 8.3 Control of Streetcar-Tra c Interface..................................................................................................................... 30 8.4 Signage Design ................................................................................................................................................................ 30 8.5 Pavement Marking Design ...........................................................................................................................................31 8.6 General Operations.........................................................................................................................................................31 8.7 Tra c Control Through Work Zones .......................................................................................................................32 9.0 Trackwork ................................................................................................................................................33 9.1 General Trackway & Trackwork ..................................................................................................................................33 10.0 Structural .............................................................................................................................................. 35 10.1 General ...............................................................................................................................................................................35 10.2 Applicable Codes and Standards ...........................................................................................................................35 10.3 Loads and Forces ..........................................................................................................................................................36 11.0 Vehicles .................................................................................................................................................. 37 11.1 Vehicle Type .....................................................................................................................................................................37 11.2 Accessibility & ADA Compliance .............................................................................................................................37 11.3 Operating Environment .............................................................................................................................................. 38 11.4 Traction Power Supply Voltages .............................................................................................................................39 Portland Streetcar | Development Design Standards Page 4 11.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? the Qline and the People Mover”
    “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover” John B. Sutcliffe, Sarah Cipkar and Geoffrey Alchin Department of Political Science, University of Windsor Windsor, Ontario, N9B 3P4 Email: sutclif@uwindsor.ca Paper prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC. June 2019. This is a working draft. Please do not cite without permission. 1 “Can Public Transit Revitalize Detroit? The QLine and the People Mover" Introduction On May 12, 2017 a new streetcar – the QLine – began operating in Detroit, running along a 3.3- mile (6.6-mile return) route on Woodward Avenue, one of the central north-south roads in the city. This project is one example of the return to prominence of streetcars in the (re)development of American cities. Having fallen into disuse and abandonment in hundreds of American cities during the early part of the 20th century, this form of public transit has returned in many cities including, for example, Dallas, Cincinnati, Kansas City, and Portland. As streetcar services have returned to prominence, so too has the debate about their utility as a form of public transit, the function they serve in a city, and who they serve (Brown 2013; Culver 2017). These debates are evident in the case of Detroit. Proponents of the QLine – most prominently the individuals and organizations that advocated for its creation and provided the majority of the start-up capital – have praised the streetcar for acting as a spur to development, for being a forward-thinking transit system and for acting as a first step towards a comprehensive regional transit system in Metro Detroit (see M-1 Rail 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Summary Public Review Draft
    Evaluation Summary Public Review Draft July 12, 2007 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0. Corridor Background.................................................................................................................... 2 2.0. Study Organization and Decision-Making................................................................................... 4 3.0. Purpose and Need of the Alternative Analysis............................................................................ 5 3.1. Need for Transit Project.......................................................................................................... 5 3.2. Purpose and Need Statements................................................................................................. 6 4.0 Definition of Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 7 4.1. Early Alternatives Screened Out............................................................................................. 7 4.2. Alternatives Carried Forward ................................................................................................. 8 4.3 Capacity Considerations…………………………………………………………………….15 5.0. Evaluation of Alternatives ........................................................................................................ 17 5.1. Travel Time and Ridership..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fy20 Strategic Plan
    FAIRFIELD AND SUISUN TRANSIT FY20 STRATEGIC PLAN FOUNDATION MISSION VISION At FAST, we strive to: To provide a safe and efficient transportation service for our community with . Provide sustainable and innovative service. a high standard of quality. Have a positive impact on our community and environment. Deliver convenient service so people will ride with us. PRINCIPLES STEWARDSHIP SERVICE RELATIONS POSITIVE OUTCOMES We will appropriately manage taxpayer We will provide our community with the We will work as a team to foster positive We will proactively seek innovative resources: time, money, people, and facilities highest quality service by focusing on safety, relations with each other, our customers, our improvements that result in positive and to serve the community and improve our convenience, reliability, and sustainability. community, and our stakeholders. sustainable outcomes. environment. VALUES COMMUNITY/ FACILITIES FINANCES FLEET OPERATIONS SAFETY SYSTEMS CUSTOMERS EMPLOYEES GOALS • Conduct annual FAST • Hire Transportation • Partner with City • Seek and assist with applying • Work with outside consultant • Conduct a Request for • Reduce preventable • Award contract and Customer Satisfaction Survey Manager, Transit engineering staff to continue for funding opportunities for and PG&E to develop an Proposal (RFP) for Transit accident rate to meet implement an updated to monitor performance Operations Manager, engineering, design, and fleet replacement, Fairfield- effective Fleet Ready Plan Operations Services and contract safety standards. transit data management goals and evaluate service Public Works Assistant, construction efforts on the Vacaville Train Station: Phase for the Corporation Yard. award contract. • Use DriveCam to system. quality. and Office Specialist following key projects: II construction (additional • Solicit bids/award contract • Complete a RFP identifying continually improve safety.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011
    City of Milwaukee, Wis. Environmental Assessment October 2011 Prepared by the City of Milwaukee in cooperation with the Federal Transit Administration (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment ii October 2011 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES Lead Agency: Federal Transit Administration Project Sponsors: City of Milwaukee WHERE TO FIND COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT A hard copy of the document is available for public inspection at the Federal Transit Administration field office at the following location: Federal Transit Administration Region V 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Hard copies of the document will also be available at the following locations: Milwaukee Public Library – Central Milwaukee Public Library – Center Street 814 W. Wisconsin Avenue 2727 W. Fond du Lac Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53210 Milwaukee Public Library – Forest Home Milwaukee Department of City Development 1432 W. Forest Home Avenue 809 Broadway, 1st Floor Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53204 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Legislative Reference Bureau, Milwaukee City Hall City Hall, Room B-11 200 East Wells Street Milwaukee, WI 53202 To view an electronic copy of this document, please visit the project Web site at www.themilwaukeestreetcar.com. CONTACT INFORMATION For additional information concerning this document please contact our public involvement coordinator who can direct your questions and comments to the appropriate person: Lois Kimmelman, Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Transit Administration Region 5 200 West Adams St., Suite 320 Chicago, IL 60606 Kristine Martinsek, Milwaukee Streetcar Public Involvement Coordinator Martinsek and Associates 1325 E. Potter Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53207 Milwaukee Streetcar Environmental Assessment iii October 2011 ABSTRACT The proposed Milwaukee Streetcar project would establish a starter streetcar system in and around downtown Milwaukee connecting workers, visitors and residents to key destinations and attractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan
    Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the-Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the- Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway, Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • 509 22,233 51%
    METALS & MACHINERY Benchmade A Manufacturing Powerhouse Greater Portland is home to firms that manufacture highly specialized products, including Freightliners from Daimler Trucks, passenger ferries and cargo ships at Vigor Industrial, and aerospace parts from Boeing. Other Portland-area firms include Schnitzer Steel and Precision Castparts. The region’s metals and machinery sector is outperforming its national peers in job growth by 10 percent. INDUSTRY SNAPSHOT 509 Total number of establishments 22,233 Total employment in metals and machinery industries 51% Manufacturers in Oregon account for 22%, or Employment growth versus $49.4 billion, of the state’s total economic output. the national average TOP METALS + MACHINERY FIRMS IN GREATER PORTLAND 10% Job growth outperforming Precision Castparts Vigor Industrial Leatherman Tool national peers in metals and Corp. 1,230 employees Group machinery sector. 3,849 employees 503 employees Greenbrier Schnitzer Steel 1,103 employees EVRAZ North 3,183 employees America A-dec 450 employees Daimler Trucks North 1,100 employees America Blount International 3,000 employees 527 employees The Boeing Company 1,500 employees —PBJ Book of Lists, 2019 SUCCESS STORIES BOEING OREGON MANUFACTURING The aerospace company employs over 1,500 at its plant INNOVATION CENTER in Gresham, where it makes parts for its jets. These parts The Oregon Manufacturing Innovation Center (OMIC) include a component used to extend and retract wing is a partnership between industry leaders, research flaps during flight. This is Boeing’s largest machine shop institutions and local agencies that provides advanced and provides components to every Boeing aircraft. technical training for the region’s workforce while developing new tools, techniques and technologies that PRECISION CASTPARTS address real-world manufacturing challenges facing the Founded in 1953, Portland-based Precision Castparts industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Central Building Anchor Full Block Between Se 8Th & 9Th / Se Morrison & Belmont 808 Se Morrison Street | Portland | Oregon | 97214
    GRAND CENTRAL BUILDING ANCHOR FULL BLOCK BETWEEN SE 8TH & 9TH / SE MORRISON & BELMONT 808 SE MORRISON STREET | PORTLAND | OREGON | 97214 APPROXIMATELY 20,617 SQUARE FOOT ANCHOR SPACE WITH OFF-STREET PARKING AVAILABLE ANCHOR SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY PRIME LOCATION IN THE CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ANCHOR SIGNAGE OPPORTUNITY SE MORRISON STREET Looking East From SE 7th & Morrison CENTRAL EASTSIDE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT | SE 8TH & MORRISON / SE 9TH & BELMONT THE GRAND CENTRAL BUILDING Building Overview | A Contributing Historic Property to Portland’s Fruitpacking District The Grand Central Building is a Spanish Colonial Revival building originally constructed in 1929 as a public market in Portland’s fruitpacking district and featured 23 separate vendors. Available Space | Anchor Space Total: Approximately 20,617 Square Feet First Floor: 15,617 Square Feet Mezzanine: 5,000 Square Feet Parking | The Grand Central Building features an underground parking garage with 76 parking spaces as well as a surface lot on the west side of the building with 28 additional parking spaces. Building Co-Tenants | West Face of Building Area Retailers | Building Location | Located between SE Morrison & Belmont Streets, SE 8th & 9th Avenues The Central Eastside Industrial District (CEID), the area bound by Interstate 84 to the North, the Willamette River to the west, Powell Blvd / Hwy 26 to the south, and NE/SE 12th Avenue to the east, was once the fruitpacking center of Portland. Located immediately east across the Burnside, Morrison, and Hawthorne Bridges from Downtown Portland, the CEID provides a convenient - and often more spacious - alternative to the CBD for office users and retailers looking to locate in the Central City.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson
    Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Volume 19 503 Issue 2 Spring 2014 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues In this issue: are up to date. 2014 dues were due Jan 1, 2014. Trolleys Through the Timber - Richard Thompson....................1 Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News.......................2 If it has been longer than one year since you renewed, Interpretative Center Update Greg Bonn....................................2 go to our website: oerhs.org and download an Red Trolleys in the Sun Mark Kavanagh..................................5 application by clicking: Become a Member MAX Yellow Line Lou Bowerman ..............................................6 Seattle Transit Update Roy Bonn................................................7 Tucson Sun Link Update Roy Bonn............................................9 See this issue in color on line DC Streetcar Update Roy Bonn..............................................10 at oerhs.org/transfer Pacific Northwest Transit Update Roy Bonn..............................10 Spotlight on Members: Hal Rosene ..........................................11 Trolleys Through the Timber Oregon’s Small Town Streetcar Systems By Richard Thompson The following article is excerpted from Richard's upcoming book, “Trolleys Through the Timber: Oregon's Small Town Streetcar Systems.” As the working title indicates, it will focus upon streetcars outside of Portland. This new endeavor will allow the author to further develop information about small town streetcar systems that previously appeared in his online Oregon Encyclopedia entries, and his four books for Arcadia Publishing. By the turn of the 20th century the Small town streetcar systems often relied on secondhand rolling stock. This interurban- street railway had become a vital part of like Forest Grove Transportation Company car is thought to have started life as a trailer urban transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • APTA 2017 Adwheel Awards
    APTA 2017 AdWheel Awards Category 1: Best Marketing and Communications to Increase Ridership and Sales Hop Fastpass Contents Effectiveness Statement ………. 3 Print Media ………………………….. 5 Outreach Brochure ………………………………… 5 Print Ad …………………………………………………. 6 Transit Ads .………………………….. 5 Ads on Transit Vehicles/System ….………….. 7 Channel Card Series ……………………………... 8 Collateral ……………………………. 10 Retail Network Display Kit ……..…………….. 10 Retail Display Rack ………………………………. 11 Electronic Media …………………. 12 Website ………………………….……..…………….. 12 Outreach Email …………………………………..... 13 Online Videos ……………………………………….. 14 Special Event ……………………... 15 “Hop-Up” Event ……………………………………. 15 The HopMobile …………………………………….. 16 Opening Ceremony Video ……………………… 17 Promotional Items ………………………………... 17 Mascot …………………………………………………. 17 Social Media ……………….……… 18 Facebook Posts …………………………………….. 18 Partnership ………………………... 19 Press Event Sponsor Photo ……………………. 19 2 Effectiveness Statement APTA 2017 AdWheel Awards Category 1: Best Marketing and Communications to Increase Ridership and Sales Hop Fastpass 1. Target The primary audience is all TriMet, Portland Streetcar, and C-TRAN riders. The secondary audience includes the general public of the Portland-Vancouver metro area, transit employees, occasional transit riders, visitors, stakeholders and services that provide fare for their clients. 2. Situation/Challenge Hop Fastpass is the new regional e-fare system that works on TriMet, Portland Streetcar and C-TRAN. The biggest challenge was introducing a new fare technology across three different
    [Show full text]
  • ANC6A Resolution No. 2021-002
    ANC 6A RESOLUTION NO. 2021-002 Resolution regarding ANC 6A support for completing the DC Streetcar from Benning Road Metro Station to Georgetown as Planned and Promised WHEREAS, Advisory Neighborhood Commissions (ANCs) were created to “advise the Council of the District of Columbia, the Mayor, and each executive agency with respect to all proposed matters of District government policy,” including transportation and economic development; WHEREAS, public transportation is a shared public benefit and can only function as such when it’s shared with all neighborhoods; WHEREAS, ANC 7E recently passed a resolution of support for the streetcar extension to Benning Road Metro station; WHEREAS, the District Department of Transportation (DDOT) recently published its Final Environmental Assessment where it found the extension to Benning Metro Station is the preferred alternative and only feasible alternative from an engineering perspective; WHEREAS, the eastward extension to Benning Road Metro is the only feasible alternative that provides a multi-modal connection to Metro; WHEREAS, the eventual westward extension to Georgetown would establish the only east-west rail-transit option for travel all the way to Georgetown; WHEREAS, the eventual westward extension to Georgetown would be the first and only fully unified transit system from eastern portions of the District to Georgetown; WHEREAS, the full streetcar route from Benning Road Metro to Georgetown would provide an enjoyable and robust east-west transportation option for residents in ward 6 and
    [Show full text]
  • Streetcar Plan Posters
    WELCOME Welcome! The purpose of this open house is to present draft recommendations from the Bicycle Master Plan and the Streetcar System Plan to the public. City sta! and citizen volunteers are here to present the material and to answer questions. The room is divided into three sections: one for the Bicycle Master Plan, one for the Streetcar System Plan, and one called “Integration Station,” where we tie the two concepts together. Refreshments and child care services are also available. The bicycle and streetcar networks will play a key role in Portland’s future. Together, they will reduce reliance on the automobile for daily tasks, they will reinforce urban land use patterns, and they will help the City achieve its goals to combat climate change. This is the beginning of a transportation transformation. WHY PLAN? PORTLAND HAS A HISTORY OF SUCCESSFUL LONG-RANGE PLANNING In 1904, landscape architect John C. Olmsted produced a report for the City Among the parks that resulted from the Olmsted Plan are Holladay Park, Irving Parks Board. The plan served as a blueprint for development of the highly Park, Mt. Tabor (shown above), Overlook Park, Rocky Butte, Sellwood Park, valued park system we enjoy today. Washington Park, and several others. Interstate MAX Opened 2004 Airport MAX Hillsboro MAX Opened 2001 Opened 1998 Portland Streetcar Opened 2001 MAX to Gresham Opened 1986 Clackamas MAX Opens fall 2009 Westside Express Service Opened Feb. 2009 In 1989, three years after the "rst MAX line opened from downtown to Gresham, 20 years later the regional rail system is well on its way to being constructed as planners laid out a vision for a regional rail system.
    [Show full text]