DOCSLIB.ORG

33 I 23372 * LTF ISO * 2529 KEBBEBE PLEASE INDICATE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

33 i 23372 * LTF ISO * 2529 KEBBEBE PLEASE INDICATE FINAL ETA AMD FLIGHT NUMBERS OF THE SENIOR OFFICERS ARRIVING NEWYORK OK 7 APRIL 19S3 * BBNCHI * 7 LTF LEO * 3435 AH$Ei AAA WHILE UNDERSTANDING GREAT EFFORT Aft HOST AN3CI0US OBTAIN SOONEST YOBR DRAFT REVISED CGNSQ FUKB PROGRAMME. ADVISE ANTICIPATES DATE YOU CAN POUCH, IT WILL BE ESSENTIAL FOR BClSlGN ON MAGNITUDE CRASH EECEUITMEMT MOGHAMME* BBS '!» VIEW POSITION TAKEN BY * n » HJITED STATES GOVEHN3S®KT IN ITS AIDE MEMOIRE, THE PRESENTATION OF YOUH REVISES PROGRAMME SHOULD SIVE CLEAR INBICATION OF FIRST AKD SECOND PRIORITIES IK TE1MS OF PROJECTS AND SPECIFIC POSTS* TO FACILITATE CO^SIBEHATION OF US PROPOSAL QUOTE TO ADJUST PROGRAMME TO A^ ORDER OF &AGNITUBE COMPARABLE TO THE * PROGRAMME UNQUOTE PLEASE SET UP FIRST PRIORITY PROJECTS r/7 -WITHIN THESE FINANCIAL LIMITS. CCC AM NOT SATISFIED WE HAVE CLEAR AGREEMENT OK TYPE CONTRACT TO BE OFFERED TO EXPERTS '7 ' TO BE RECRUITED UKDER PUBLIC WORKS AND POLICE. PLEASE CABLE YOUR SUGGESTIONS IN DETAIL « r- —>' c?j "**• — ^ AMACHREE ^ 5 ^ c5o COL 2S35 1^3 1962 ^*- H LINE 4 6TH TEXT DECISION* $ .2.3522 CMUC IMMEDIATE GARBINER REFERENCE Gf-SSO* PLEASE INFORM MINISTRY £F FOREIGN AFFAIRS OK BEHALF OF SECGEI3 THAT IN HESPOKSE TO WEIR C0MMNICATI0H HE IS BEFERHING G^SIDERATION BY CON€0 ASVISOET COMiimi OF QUESTION OF TEAMING OF CONGOLESE mm mm TUESBAY AFTERMe©^ SIXTEEN APRIL. WILL mi^ * * AS SCHEDULED OK KQNBAY EUSHT APSIL FOR PURPOSED AS GBIGINALLY OF tJEETINS ANB CONSUiflNS WITH SINES AL KEBBEDE HIS COiLEAGUES. SUSSTIOW OF TMI^ING OF ANC ¥ILL BE EJCCLUBEB fnm THE BISCUSSI0N ON EIGHT APRIL » BUNCHE 4- • KC8SJ m tG|/99 $ 1S2I2 PI/32/50 * LTF owuc LI:G » $SSS KLINTBIHS/TflfT. ETHIOPIAN REPATRIATION. FIRST C-118 AIRCRAFT ETA STANLEYVILLE FBOW 2OTIBE 14, 13, |«9 IS* 19, 20 APS It AT AMB ETB 05002 SAME BAY F08 HARM MESA* SECOND AIRCRAFT HOUR LATEE, THIRB AIRCRAFT O^JE H00S AFTER * 11*1 EVEWT OF MECHAWICAt OK OTHER BEUYS DfJRI^S FIRST THREE MVS FLIGHTS WILL BE CONDUCTED 4? APSIL TO COMPENSATE, IN AD- BITI ON C-124 NAIHTEHAKCE SOPFOUT AIRCRAFT WILL BE BASED AT EOTESIE* WILL ASVJSE ON S ©H 9 APRIL FLI6HT SCHEDULE FOR REPATRIATION OF EI4SABETHVILLX BATTALION * BUNCHE + COL 2$S8 C-U8 14 15 IS JS 19 20 04002 05002 17 C-IS4 8 9 + c: S NY WS9 9 ETAT PRIORITE ONUC LEO « 2SS&KUNTBERG YOUR 2562* AAA PLANS FOB REPATRIATION OF TWO ETHIOPIAN BATTALIONS HAVE BEEN FINALI2EB ANB RESRET IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO CHANGE THEM AT THIS BATE. ROTATION OF REMAINING TWO BATTALIONS WILL BE PLANNED AS SOON AS ETHIOPIAN MISSION US WITH NECESSARY INFORMATION* * P3/W39 * BBS AS YOU KNOW IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOB THIS HEADQUARTERS TO PLAN SUCH A MAJOR OPERATION AS A ROTATION UNLESS REQUESTS AND AUTHORIZATION ARE RECEIVED FSO$ THE GOVERNMENTS* ONLY OFFICIAL INTERMEDIARY NAMELY THEIR MISSION TO THE UN1TEB NATIONS * COL 268S 25S2 w 0 YC217 S ETATPRIORITE O o o 2S01 GARDIWER REFERENCE QNUG 2$7S. FULLY EKBOHSE INSTRUCTIONS YOU HAVE SIVEK TO MTHU WITH REGARD TO INTRODUCTION OF ANC 155 JABQTVXLLJ:. MUST REITERATE MY VIEW THAT EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE EXERTED TO AVOID aAESlSONIMa AHC WITHIN THE TOWNS. IN THIS RESPECT AM SlffiPSlSEB AT * INDICATION THAT SOME ANC ARE ENCAMPED IN CENTRE ©F ELISABETHVIUI * BtlNCHE •*• COL PRESS OWfJC TEXT OF SEC SEN'S LETTER TO GARDNER AMU ANNOUNCEMENT 49 BORSINVILLE'S APPOINTMENT RELEASED H0RS ELEVEN AW LOCAL. PARA I€¥YORK TIMES EDITORIAL ON CONGO'S NE9 GOVERNMENT BEGINS QUOTE WITH COMMENDABLE FLEXIBILITY, PREMIER ADOULA APPEARS 49 TO Mm WEATHERED POLITICAL CRISIS THAT THREATENS TO PTOPPLE HIS GOVERNMENT AND PLUNGE * 9 * <f INTO CHAOS UNQUOTE EB1TGRIAL THACES RECEKT DEVELOPMENT ASSERTING THAT PREMIER ADOULA'S PURPOSE QUOTE MUST BE TO BUILD NATIONS TRULY SOVEREIGN AMD INDEPENDENT, ABLE TO STAND <f m ITS OWN FEET UNHUQTE. AFTER IHDICATING LINES OF MUL- TIFACETIB RECOKiTRUCTIO^ PROGRAM EDITORIAL CONCLUDES S00TE MANY 6HAVE PROBLEMS REMAIN, IN * * PARTICULAR THE CONTRY'S CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM, IN WHICH CENTRALISM OR FEBERALISM IS STILL MAIN ISSUE. BUT PREMIER ABOULA 1$ TRYING TO SO CONGO ON LIBERAL ANB DEMOCRATIC COURSE BASED OH MULTIPARTY SYSTEM ANB FREE ENTERPRISE. HE MERITS ALL SUPPORT HE CAN GET NOT ONLY FROM WEST BUT FROM ALL FREE NATIONS « C0L. S9St| 4- •~,^f "O 23 W LTF (ft ONUC LEO « 29SS AHMED WHOLESALE IMPLEMENTATION RECRUITMENT MUST NECESSARILY <ft MAIT FINAL DECISION ON MAGNITUDE l%3 PROGRAMME, HOWEVER, IN ORDER NOT TO IMPEDE PROGRESS ON PRELIMINARY RECRUITMENT ACTIONS THESE MAY PROCEED SHORT OF OFFER OF APPOINTMENT. ACTUAL 9 CFFEHS MAY BE MADE ONLY AS AN EXCEPTION IF APPROVED * SPECIFICALLY BY ME AND REQUEST THEY SUBMIT TO YOU FOR TRANSMISSION (ft TO AND APPROVAL BY NEW YORK PROVISIONAL LISTING OF ANTICIPATED ESSENTIAL APPOINTMENTS UP TO 30 MAY. WITH REGARD TO FAO FOLLOWING CABLE SENT TODAY TO WEISLI » (ft P3 * QUOTE REGRET DELAY REPLY YOUR 2&9» AS YOU ARE AWARE, WE ARE REVIEWING OUR REQUIREMENTS AND RESOURCES AT THIS JUNCTURE AND (ft HAVE TO TAKE A MOST CAUTIOUS ATTITUDE TO PROTECT SOLVENCY OF THE CONGO FUND. FOR THIS REASON FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION WAS SENT TO AHMSB (ABOVE TEXT * 49 P4/34 » QUOTED). WOULD EXPECT THAT PART OF REHABILITATION OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE PROJECT NEEDS APPOINTMENTS BEFORE 30 MAY* 9 KINDLY ADVISE AHMED OF YOUR PLANS IN ACCORDANCE PROCEDURE QUOT4EBj; c ABOVE* UNQUOTE * P -^ AMACHSEE * •• ^ (ft COL 2S»S1 1963 30 159 30 * ~i X US 93 NY 13$ 24 20SS2 * • PRESS CNUC LE8 * • 3003 FYI AT BRIEFING HOSS UN SPOKESMAN SAID THAT MEMBERS OF CONGO ADVISORY COMMITTEE YESTE8DAY HAD EXPRESSED VIEWS ON ACTION WHICH SHOULD BE TAKEN I® RELATION TO PROGRAM OF ft TRAINING FOR ANC FORCES IK CONGO. THERE HAD BEEN DIVERGENCE 11*1 VIEWS AND NO GENERAL CONSENSUS. * ft Pg * ft PRIME MINISTER ABOULA NO LONGER INSISTS ON UN UMBRELLA OVER TRAILING PROGRAMME. GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTIONS HOWEVER HAVE ALWAYS REQUIRED THAT ALL ASSISTANCE TO CONGO SHOULD BE THROUGH UNITED NATIONS CHANNELS. PARA IT IS NOW EXPECTED THAT SECRETARY GENERAL WILL MAKE DECISION RE SITUATION IN LIGHT OF VARIOUS EXPRESSIONS * P3/36 * OF VIEW AT MEETING YESTERDAY. SECRETARY GENERAL WILL MAKE VIEWS KNOWN BEFORE HE LEAVES ON EUROPEAN VISIT ON MONDAY a§ APRIL* NO FUTURE MEETING OF CONGO ADVISORY COMMITTEE HAS mm SCHEDULES ENS « OPPRESS NEWYORK 4- COL 2$ + NY 35/M 24 30i2 KEBBEDE KIGERIAM MISSION INFORMS THAT THE FEDERATION OF NIGE11A HAS A6REEB T© RELEASE BRISABIER K.R.A.O* OSUWSIPE TO ASSUME DUTIES AS CHIEF OF STAFF OF OKUC HQ IN THE CiPSQ * -I- S ETAT PR1GRITE GNUC LEO * STSENGTK TROOP COKTINGENTS CONGO TOTAL 13? 77 9 RELEASED OHNIPRISS NEWORK COL 3078 J3»779 -f S ETA? PEI0RITE ONUC IE® * 1341 IMMEDIATE BQB3IWILLE. FOLLOWING IS TEXT 0F BQMBOKG'S TO SECGEN MTEB 24 .APRIL* QUOTE L£ IEUNI0N DU COMITE B*HJER A, A Em AVIS FAIT BEGAGER IES TENDANCES QUI PEHBAJfF LOKQTEf5PS SOMT RESTEES COUVERTES S0US BES AHSUMENTS atll EM FAIT HE TQtfCHAIENT PAS * F8/54/00 « UE F08B 9U PROBLEMS. PARA J*ASMTS SUE Lf ASPECT JURIBIQUE BE LA QUESTION A POUH VOUS PEHSONNELLEMEUT UNE IMPORTANCE PaiHORBIALE* MAIS JE PEHSE SUE VOUS WE MAMQUE8E2 PAS B« ARGUMENTS POUR JtfSTIFIEI m AGTE POSIT1F BE V0TRE PART* ET UN BE CES A&SlfMETO F0M0AJ5I«TAIIX 1ST TOUT B'ABQSD LA HESOLUTIOK DU 21 FEVHIER 1961, PAS CONSEQUENT POSTEHIEURE A CELLE BE L* ASSEMBLES GENERALS, SE RAPPORTAKT BE HANIEHE EXPRESSE A LA SEOReAMISATION BE L*AH8EE KATI©NALE» PARA CETTE RESOLUTION B8IT ETRE COMPRISE BAMS LE SENS BE L* ACCORD BE PRINCIPE EN BATE BU 17 *3AI !9&i PASSE ENTRE LE PRESIDENT * BE LA REPUBLIQUE ET LE SECRETAIRE GENERAL DE L» ORGANISATION SES 8ATIQMS U8IES A L'EPQtUE* PASA EN 0EHORS DE GET ASPECT JUSIBIQUE, LES AUTRES OBJECTIONS QUI ONT ETE SOULEVEES EELEVEKT BEAU€OBP PLMS, SOIT B'UN SEJ3TIMEOT BE FRUSTRATION SOIT SE HESSEKTim:KfS A LfEGAS0 0fUJ3 CERTAIN NOMBRE DE PAYS » JSTEC LEStUELS CERTAINS EfATS MMBRIS BU COKITE CONSULT ATIF ^ENTIETIEN^NT PAS BE RELATIONS POUTI&UES NORMALES. mm CES R£ss£wra£OTs KE BOIVEIIT PAS NOUS ARRETER A ENVISAGER m PROGRAMME m REsm§ANISATI©&l BE L^ARMEE 0UI SOIT, BES MAISJTEKAOT SUSCEPflBLE BE CQ«iTER Ufi MXI^UM D'EFFICACITE AVIC UM MiWimJM DE BEPENSES* PAKA C*EST « BANS CE BUT LA, SUE NQtRE PHQSHAMHE A ETE CHOISI ET C'EST EH rOKCTIOK DE CET ELEMENT LA SUE LA LISTE B'OK CERTAIN NOMBRE BE PAYS VOUS A ETE COMtlKIQUEE. PARA NOUS NE VOULONS PAS VOUS EMBAHRASSREI EN EXISEA^T BE LA PART BE L* ORGANISATION B£S f&flOJJS HHIES ilNE * VI/&/5G * RESP©NSABILIT£ aUELCOKQUE BANS CETTE REORGANISATION LA RESPONSABILITE C*EST NOUS QUI L*ASSUMONS A NOT8E CONSTITUTION ET NOTRE REQUETE EVENTUELLE A Lf ORGANISATION 5ES MATI0NS UNIES NE POUEIA COMPORTER DEMAKBE 0» ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE SIKICOLOH UNE MISE A NOTRE BtSPOSlTI^ B*U& CERTAIN NGHBHE B* EXPERTS EN HATIERE ftHiITAIRE? SlTSCIPflBLES BE MOOS AIDER » MNS L'ACCOHPLISSEHENT SE CETTE TACHE. PASA IL EST EVIDENT SUE NOTSE SEGUETE E<?T SOHMISE A LA PRGncmiBF MfiPMAlT HFC NATTnue m MATIEBE B* ASSISTANCE TECHNIQUE, PARA VOJLA EXACTEMENT LE SENS F0HBA8ENTAL BE LA BEINIERE LETTRE SU PREMIER m BATE BU IS AVRIL 1963. PAM LA SEULE * QUESTION A LASUELLE NOUS POHTOMS TOUT NOTRE INTEHET £ST CELLS BE SAVOIR8 FAHA PSIMO.- Si IE SECRETARIAT S*OPPOSEBAIT A CE tOE BURANt LA PRESENCE KILITA1RE BES NATIONS UMIES AU COHGO, LE GGUVERNErffiNT CENTRAL EK SAISON BE SA SQUVERAINETE, PROCEDE A 1A REORGANISATION ET A * LA M0BERMISATIOK BE LrARMEE RATIONALE A9EC Lf ASSISTANCE BES PAYS BE SON CHOm PAiA SECtl^BO,- EST-CE QUC LE SECRETARIAT SEVERAL SE REFUSEEAIT D'ACCOSDEH AH GOUVERNE^ENT CENTRAL, SUR SA REQUETE, DES EXPERTS POUR L'AIBER DAKS CETTE REORGANISATION? PASA M FENSE QUE CE SQNT LA LES SEULES * * QUESTIONS mi mm L*IMM£I»IAT SOKT SOSCEPTIBLES DE CLARIFIES LA SITUATION C0&JFWSE QUI POURSAIT HIsaUER BE REe^5ER DANS LES RELATIONS ENTRE LI GOWESICt5ENT CEOT8AL ET LES NATIONS UNIES All SIWET BU PROBLim mi NOUS INTEBESSE.
Recommended publications
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of

    The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College Of

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Earth and Mineral Sciences STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR RESOURCE ENDOWED COUNTRIES TO AVERT THE RESOURCE CURSE PHENOMENON: WITH A CASE STUDY OF THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO A Thesis in Energy and Mineral Engineering by Joyce N. Masangu ©2018 Joyce N. Masangu Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science May 2018 The thesis of Joyce N. Masangu was reviewed and approved* by the following: Jeffery Kohler Professor and Chair of Mining Engineering George H. Jr. and Anne B. Deike Endowed Chair in Mining Engineering Thesis Advisor Shimin Liu Assistant Professor of Energy and Mineral Engineering Sekhar Bhattacharyya Associate Professor of Mining Engineering Luis F. Ayala H. William A. Fustos Family Professor Professor of Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering Associate Department Head for Graduate Education *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT The discovery of a new valuable mineral deposit in a country does not always lead to economic growth or development in a nation. There are many examples of countries with abundant resources whose economic and social situations have not improved, and in many cases have worsened, because of their bountiful mineral resources. The “resource curse” describes the paradoxical fact that countries with an abundance of natural resources, specifically non- renewable resources like minerals and fuels, tend to have less economic growth and worse development outcomes than countries with fewer natural resources. The degree of the phenomenon’s effects varies from country to country. There are many causes and symptoms of the resource curse evident in the economics literature, but there is no clear guidance on how a country can avert its resource curse.
  • CR 2005/13 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2005/13 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2005/13 Cour internationale International Court de Justice of Justice LA HAYE THE HAGUE ANNÉE 2005 Audience publique tenue le lundi 25 avril 2005, à 15 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Shi, président, en l’affaire des Activités armées sur le territoire du Congo (République démocratique du Congo c. Ouganda) ________________ COMPTE RENDU ________________ YEAR 2005 Public sitting held on Monday 25 April 2005, at 3 p.m., at the Peace Palace, President Shi presiding, in the case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) ____________________ VERBATIM RECORD ____________________ - 2 - Présents : M. Shi, président M. Ranjeva, vice-président MM. Koroma Vereshchetin Mme Higgins MM. Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Buergenthal Elaraby Owada Simma Tomka Abraham, juges MM. Verhoeven, Kateka, juges ad hoc M. Couvreur, greffier ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - 3 - Present: President Shi Vice-President Ranjeva Judges Koroma Vereshchetin Higgins Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Buergenthal Elaraby Owada Simma Tomka Abraham Judges ad hoc Verhoeven Kateka Registrar Couvreur ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - 4 - Le Gouvernement de la République du Congo est représenté par : S. Exc. M. Honorius Kisimba Ngoy Ndalewe, ministre de la justice et garde des sceaux de la République démocratique du Congo, comme chef de la délégation; S. Exc. M. Jacques Masangu-a-Mwanza, ambassadeur extraordinaire et plénipotentiaire auprès du Royaume des Pays-Bas, comme agent; M. Tshibangu Kalala, avocat aux barreaux de Kinshasa et de Bruxelles, comme coagent et avocat; M. Olivier Corten, professeur de droit international à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, M. Pierre Klein, professeur de droit international, directeur du centre de droit international de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, M.
  • CR 2002/36 (Traduction)

    CR 2002/36 (Traduction)

    CRW CR 2002/36 (traduction) CR 2002/36 (translation) Jeudi 13 juin 2002 à 10 heures Thursday 13 June 2002 at 10 a.m. - 2 - The PRESIDENT: Please be seated. The sitting is open. The Court meets today under Article 74, paragraph 3, of the Rules of Court to hear the observations of the Parties on the Request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda). Unfortunately, Judge Oda is unable, for reasons of which he has duly informed the Court, to be present on the bench today. Before recalling the principal phases of the present proceedings, it is necessary to complete the composition of the Court. Each of the Parties in the present case, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Rwandese Republic, has availed itself of the possibility afforded it by Article 31 of the Statute of the Court to choose a judge ad hoc. The Democratic Republic of the Congo has chosen Mr. Jean-Pierre Mavungu Mvumbi-di-Ngoma and the Rwandese Republic Mr. Christopher John Robert Dugard. Article 20 of the Statute provides that “[e]very Member of the Court shall, before taking up his duties, make a solemn declaration in open court that he will exercise his powers impartially and conscientiously”. By Article 31, paragraph 6, of the Statute, that provision applies to judges ad hoc. In accordance with custom, I shall first say a few words about the career and qualifications of each of the two judges who will be making the required declaration.
  • International Court of Justice Year 2002 2002 14

    International Court of Justice Year 2002 2002 14

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR 2002 2002 14 February General List No. 121 14 February 2002 CASE CONCERNING THE ARREST WARRANT OF 11 APRIL 2000 (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. BELGIUM) Facts of the case ¾ Issue by a Belgian investigating magistrate of “an international arrest warrant in absentia” against the incumbent Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Congo, alleging grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and of the Additional Protocols thereto and crimes against humanity ¾ International circulation of arrest warrant through Interpol ¾ Person concerned subsequently ceasing to hold office as Minister for Foreign Affairs. * * First objection of Belgium ¾ Jurisdiction of the Court ¾ Statute of the Court, Article 36, paragraph 2 ¾ Existence of a “legal dispute” between the Parties at the time of filing of the Application instituting proceedings ¾ Events subsequent to the filing of the Application do not deprive the Court of jurisdiction. Second objection of Belgium ¾ Mootness ¾ Fact that the person concerned had ceased to hold office as Minister for Foreign Affairs does not put an end to the dispute between the Parties and does not deprive the Application of its object. Third objection of Belgium ¾ Admissibility ¾ Facts underlying the Application instituting proceedings not changed in a way that transformed the dispute originally brought before the Court into another which is different in character. - 2 - Fourth objection of Belgium ¾ Admissibility ¾ Congo not acting in the context of protection of one of its nationals ¾ Inapplicability of rules relating to exhaustion of local remedies. Subsidiary argument of Belgium ¾ Non ultra petita rule ¾ Claim in Application instituting proceedings that Belgium’s claim to exercise a universal jurisdiction in issuing the arrest warrant is contrary to international law ¾ Claim not made in final submissions of the Congo ¾ Court unable to rule on that question in the operative part of its Judgment but not prevented from dealing with certain aspects of the question in the reasoning of its Judgment.
  • Front Matter.P65

    Front Matter.P65

    Confidential U.S. State Department Central Files CONGO 1960–January 1963 INTERNAL AFFAIRS Decimal Numbers 755A, 770G, 855A, 870G, 955A, and 970G and FOREIGN AFFAIRS Decimal Numbers 655A, 670G, 611.55A, and 611.70G Project Coordinator Robert E. Lester Guide Compiled by Martin Schipper A UPA Collection from 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963 [microform] : internal affairs and foreign affairs / [project coordinator, Robert E. Lester]. microfilm reels ; 35 mm. Accompanied by a printed guide, compiled by Martin Schipper, entitled: A guide to the microfilm edition of Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963. “The documents reproduced in this publication are among the records of the U.S. Department of State in the custody of the National Archives of the United States.” ISBN 1-55655-809-0 1. Congo (Democratic Republic)—History—Civil War, 1960–1965—Sources. 2. Congo (Democratic Republic)—Politics and government—1960–1997—Sources. 3. Congo (Democratic Republic)—Foreign relations—1960–1997—Sources. 4. United States. Dept. of State—Archives. I. Title: Confidential US State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963. II. Lester, Robert. III. Schipper, Martin Paul. IV. United States. Dept. of State. V. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. VI. University Publications of America (Firm) VII. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of Confidential U.S. State Department central files. Congo, 1960–January 1963. DT658.22 967.5103’1—dc21 2001045336 CIP The documents reproduced in this publication are among the records of the U.S.
  • CR 2005/7 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2005/7 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2005/7 Cour internationale International Court de Justice of Justice LA HAYE THE HAGUE ANNÉE 2005 Audience publique tenue le lundi 18 avril 2005, à 10 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Shi, président, en l’affaire des Activités armées sur le territoire du Congo (République démocratique du Congo c. Ouganda) ________________ COMPTE RENDU ________________ YEAR 2005 Public sitting held on Monday 18 April 2005, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Shi presiding, in the case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) ____________________ VERBATIM RECORD ____________________ - 2 - Présents : M. Shi, président M. Ranjeva, vice-président MM. Koroma Vereshchetin Mme Higgins MM. Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Owada Simma Tomka Abraham, juges MM. Verhoeven, Kateka, juges ad hoc M. Couvreur, greffier ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - 3 - Present: President Shi Vice-President Ranjeva Judges Koroma Vereshchetin Higgins Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Owada Simma Tomka Abraham Judges ad hoc Verhoeven Kateka Registrar Couvreur ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - 4 - Le Gouvernement de la République du Congo est représenté par : S. Exc. M. Honorius Kisimba Ngoy Ndalewe, ministre de la justice et garde des sceaux de la République démocratique du Congo, comme chef de la délégation; S. Exc. M. Jacques Masangu-a-Mwanza, ambassadeur extraordinaire et plénipotentiaire auprès du Royaume des Pays-Bas, comme agent; M. Tshibangu Kalala, avocat aux barreaux de Kinshasa et de Bruxelles, comme coagent et avocat; M. Olivier Corten, professeur de droit international à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, M. Pierre Klein, professeur de droit international, directeur du centre de droit international de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, M.
  • CR 2005/6 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2005/6 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2005/6 Cour internationale International Court de Justice of Justice LA HAYE THE HAGUE ANNÉE 2005 Audience publique tenue le vendredi 15 avril 2005, à 10 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Shi, président, en l’affaire des Activités armées sur le territoire du Congo (République démocratique du Congo c. Ouganda) ________________ COMPTE RENDU ________________ YEAR 2005 Public sitting held on Friday 15 April 2005, at 10 a.m., at the Peace Palace, President Shi presiding, in the case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) ____________________ VERBATIM RECORD ____________________ - 2 - Présents : M. Shi, président M. Ranjeva, vice-président MM. Koroma Vereshchetin Mme Higgins MM. Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Buergenthal Elaraby Owada Simma Tomka Abraham, juges MM. Verhoeven, Kateka, juges ad hoc M. Couvreur, greffier ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - 3 - Present: President Shi Vice-President Ranjeva Judges Koroma Vereshchetin Higgins Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Buergenthal Elaraby Owada Simma Tomka Abraham Judges ad hoc Verhoeven Kateka Registrar Couvreur ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - 4 - Le Gouvernement de la République du Congo est représenté par : S. Exc. M. Honorius Kisimba Ngoy Ndalewe, ministre de la justice et garde des sceaux de la République démocratique du Congo, comme chef de la délégation; S. Exc. M. Jacques Masangu-a-Mwanza, ambassadeur extraordinaire et plénipotentiaire auprès du Royaume des Pays-Bas, comme agent; M. Tshibangu Kalala, avocat aux barreaux de Kinshasa et de Bruxelles, comme coagent et avocat; M. Olivier Corten, professeur de droit international à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, M. Pierre Klein, professeur de droit international, directeur du centre de droit international de l’Université libre de Bruxelles, M.
  • DRC: How the CIA Got Patrice Lumumba

    DRC: How the CIA Got Patrice Lumumba

    DRC: How the CIA Got Patrice Lumumba By François Soudan Region: sub-Saharan Africa Global Research, January 19, 2021 Theme: History theafricareport 13 January 2021 On 17 January 1961, just sixty years ago, the first legally elected prime minister of the DRC was assassinated after being overthrown with help from Washington. A sinister episode that Larry Devlin, the ‘Mr. Congo’ of the CIA from 1960 to 1967, would reveal half a century later in his fascinating book, ‘Chief of Station, Congo: Fighting the Cold War in a Hot Zone.’ Leopoldville, on 30 June 1960. With the declaration of its independence, the DRC finally emerges from its long colonial history. A new bilateral system is established with a head of state as cunning as he is impenetrable, Joseph Kasavubu, and a Prime Minister as charismatic as he is unpredictable, Patrice Lumumba. In bars, people dance to the rhythm of the Independence Cha Cha, but the euphoria will be short-lived. On 5 July, a mutiny broke out in the Thysville camp (Mbanza-Ngungu), then spread to the capital. Over a matter of pay, no doubt, but also a revolt against the continued Belgian presence in the DRC by virtue of bilateral agreements. “For the army and General Janssens, who commands it, has the impudence to say that independence means nothing.” On 11 July, the rich province of Katanga, where the Belgian “Mining Union” reigns, secedes under the leadership of Moïse Tshombe. South Kasai threatens to do the same. This new state-continent is on the verge of imploding. A tough guy It is in this context that the new CIA station chief landed at Leopoldville Beach on 10 July 1960.
  • CR 2002/39 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2002/39 Cour Internationale International Court De Justice Of

    CR 2002/39 Cour internationale International Court de Justice of Justice LA HAYE THE HAGUE ANNÉE 2002 Audience publique tenue le vendredi 14 juin 2002, à 12 heures, au Palais de la Paix, sous la présidence de M. Guillaume, président, en l'affaire des Activités armées sur le territoire du Congo (nouvelle requête : 2002) (République démocratique du Congo c. Rwanda) Demande en indication de mesures conservatoires ____________ COMPTE RENDU ____________ YEAR 2002 Public sitting held on Friday 14 June 2002, at 12 noon, at the Peace Palace, President Guillaume presiding, in the case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda) Request for the indication of provisional measures _______________ VERBATIM RECORD _______________ - 2 - Présents : M. Guillaume, président MM. Ranjeva Herczegh Fleischhauer Koroma Vereshchetin Mme Higgins MM. Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Buergenthal, juges MM. Dugard Mavungu Mvumbi-di-Ngoma, juges ad hoc M. Couvreur, greffier ¾¾¾¾¾¾ - 3 - Present: President Guillaume Judges Ranjeva Herczegh Fleischhauer Koroma Vereshchetin Higgins Parra-Aranguren Kooijmans Rezek Al-Khasawneh Buergenthal Judges ad hoc Dugard Mavungu Mvumbi-di-Ngoma Registrar Couvreur ¾¾¾¾¾¾ - 4 - Le Gouvernement de la République démocratique du Congo est representé par : S. Exc. M. Jacques Masangu-a-Mwanza, ambassadeur extraordinaire et plénipotentiaire de la République démocratique du Congo auprès du Royaume des Pays-Bas, comme agent; S. Exc. M. Alphonse Ntumba Luaba Lumu, ministre des droits humains, comme coagent; M. Lwamba Katansi, professeur à l’Université de Kinshasa, M. Pierre Akele Adau, doyen de la faculté de droit de l’Université de Kinshasa et haut magistrat, comme conseils; M.
  • De Politieke Strategie Van Union Minière Du Haut-Katanga Tussen 1945 En 1960

    De Politieke Strategie Van Union Minière Du Haut-Katanga Tussen 1945 En 1960

    De politieke strategie van Union Minière du Haut-Katanga tussen 1945 en 1960 Jeroen Laporte Promotor: prof. dr. Eric Vanhaute Copromotor: prof. dr. Geert Castryck Commissaris: Sven Van Melkebeke Masterproef voorgelegd aan de Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte voor het behalen van de graad van Master in de Geschiedenis Academiejaar 2015-2016 Verklaring in verband met consulteerbaarheid De auteur en de promotor(en) geven de toelating deze studie als geheel voor consultatie beschikbaar te stellen voor persoonlijk gebruik. Elk ander gebruik valt onder de beperkingen van het auteursrecht, in het bijzonder met betrekking tot de verplichting de bron uitdrukkelijk te vermelden bij het aanhalen van gegevens uit deze studie. Het auteursrecht betreffende de gegevens vermeld in deze studie berust bij de promotor(en). Het auteursrecht beperkt zich tot de wijze waarop de auteur de problematiek van het onderwerp heeft benaderd en neergeschreven. De auteur respecteert daarbij het oorspronkelijke auteursrecht van de individueel geciteerde studies en eventueel bijhorende documentatie, zoals tabellen en figuren. De auteur en de promotor(en) zijn niet verantwoordelijk voor de behandelingen en eventuele doseringen die in deze studie geciteerd en beschreven zijn. Voorwoord Een masterproef schrijven is geen eenvoudige opdracht. Het afgelopen academiejaar was gevuld met vele lange dagen en nachten van onderzoek, zoektochten naar specifieke literatuur en talloze bezoeken aan het Rijksarchief 2 in Brussel. Door veel tijd door te brengen in het archief, is mijn onderwerp sinds september verschillende keren van focus en periodisering veranderd. Hoewel dit soms frustrerend was, bouwde ik ondertussen wel een betere kennis op van de werking van de Union Minière. Bovendien bleef de invalshoek van mijn thesis door mijn interesse en opleiding in de economie steeds dezelfde: een politieke probleemstelling trachten te beantwoorden vanuit een bedrijfsperspectief.
  • International Court of Justice

    International Court of Justice

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Press Release Unofficial No. 2006/41 1 December 2006 Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) Preliminary Objections Conclusion of the public hearings on the merits; Court ready to begin its deliberation THE HAGUE, 1 December 2006. The public hearings on the preliminary objections raised by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in the case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo) were concluded today. The Court will now start its deliberation. On 3 October 2002, within the time-limit fixed for the filing of its Counter-Memorial, the Democratic Republic of the Congo raised certain preliminary objections to the admissibility of the Application. Consequently, proceedings on the merits were suspended. At the hearings, which opened on Monday 27 November 2006 at the Peace Palace, seat of the Court, the delegation of the DRC was led by H.E. Mr. Pierre Ilunga M’Bundu wa Biloba, Minister of Justice and Keeper of the Seals, and H.E. Mr. Jacques Masangu-a-Mwanza, Ambassador of the Democratic Republic of the Congo to the Netherlands, as Agent. The delegation of Guinea was led by Mr. Mohamed Camara, Chargé d’affaires a.i. at the Embassy of the Republic of Guinea in Brussels, as Agent. The Court’s judgment on the preliminary objections will be delivered at a public sitting, the date of which will be announced in due course.

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo V Belgium

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE YEAR 2002 2002 14 February General List No. 121 14 February 2002 CASE CONCERNING THE ARREST WARRANT OF 11 APRIL 2000 (DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO v. BELGIUM) Facts of the case ¾ Issue by a Belgian investigating magistrate of “an international arrest warrant in absentia” against the incumbent Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Congo, alleging grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and of the Additional Protocols thereto and crimes against humanity ¾ International circulation of arrest warrant through Interpol ¾ Person concerned subsequently ceasing to hold office as Minister for Foreign Affairs. * * First objection of Belgium ¾ Jurisdiction of the Court ¾ Statute of the Court, Article 36, paragraph 2 ¾ Existence of a “legal dispute” between the Parties at the time of filing of the Application instituting proceedings ¾ Events subsequent to the filing of the Application do not deprive the Court of jurisdiction. Second objection of Belgium ¾ Mootness ¾ Fact that the person concerned had ceased to hold office as Minister for Foreign Affairs does not put an end to the dispute between the Parties and does not deprive the Application of its object. Third objection of Belgium ¾ Admissibility ¾ Facts underlying the Application instituting proceedings not changed in a way that transformed the dispute originally brought before the Court into another which is different in character. - 2 - Fourth objection of Belgium ¾ Admissibility ¾ Congo not acting in the context of protection of one of its nationals ¾ Inapplicability of rules relating to exhaustion of local remedies. Subsidiary argument of Belgium ¾ Non ultra petita rule ¾ Claim in Application instituting proceedings that Belgium’s claim to exercise a universal jurisdiction in issuing the arrest warrant is contrary to international law ¾ Claim not made in final submissions of the Congo ¾ Court unable to rule on that question in the operative part of its Judgment but not prevented from dealing with certain aspects of the question in the reasoning of its Judgment.