House of Assembly Tuesday 25 September 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

House of Assembly Tuesday 25 September 2018 Tuesday 25 September 2018 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People, and read Prayers. RECOGNITION OF VISITORS Madam SPEAKER - Honourable members I welcome grades 8 and 9 from the King Island District High School. Members - Hear, hear. QUESTIONS Royal Hobart Hospital - Accommodation for Young Psychiatric Patients Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Mr FERGUSON [10.03 a.m.] Last week we saw patients seeking treatment for mental ill health forced to sleep on the Emergency Department floor because of a lack of beds. We saw a whistleblower claiming young Tasmanians are dying because they cannot access mental health services. Now it has been revealed that for the past six months a 15-year-old girl has been held in seclusion at the Royal Hobart Hospital's adult psychiatric ward. Why do you not provide adequate resources and staff to provide quality care for mental health patients in Tasmania? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the member for the question. It is very important that we focus on what is best for the community and what is best for individual patients who need our services at a time of need. If you look at the way in which the Leader of the Opposition has asked the question she is asking me about a specific case of a specific person, a child in our care. The Government is not in a position, and should not be in a position, to give individual commentary on individual cases. We are not allowed to do that. We cannot do that. Ms White - Nobody asked you to. Do not deflect. Mr Bacon - Why won't you provide adequate resources and staff? Mr FERGUSON - It would be wrong to do that. It would be a breach of privacy and confidentiality to publicly discuss any individual patient. Ms O'Byrne - Nobody asked you to. Madam SPEAKER - Order. Mr FERGUSON - and by the way there can be consequences for doing so including for members opposite bringing into this place - 1 25 September 2018 Mr O'BYRNE - Point of order, Madam Speaker. Section 45 - relevance. The question was very clear. It relates to the resources and staff for quality care to mental health patients in Tasmania. The minister in his answer is reflecting on the motivations of the Labor Party which is inappropriate. Madam SPEAKER - I accept that, Mr Byrne, but it is not a point of order. I ask the minister to stay to the relevance of the question. Mr FERGUSON - Madam Speaker, I have done that and I will continue to do that. For the Leader of the Opposition to bring into this House, a public place, commentary on an individual case needs to be very carefully considered by members of this House and it should not happen. If the Leader of the Opposition has concerns, there are ways for her to raise those and ensure that they are responsibly responded to. The Government is committed in this area. We are making long overdue progress exactly so that we can provide the facilities that young people need in Tasmania. Madam Speaker, did you know that in Tasmania we have never had inpatient psychiatric services for children anywhere in Tasmania in any dedicated facility ever in our history? In all the years that Tasmania has been providing care we have never had those services. We have never had those facilities and we are now building them. Ms O'Byrne - Really? Mr FERGUSON - Yes, really. We are building them right now in Hobart in the south of the state. We are building them right now in the north of the state. We saw commitments made by members opposite in this area that were never honoured. This Government, only in our first term of office, has them now being built. Now, in our second term, we are about to open them. We should never see children's psychiatric care, especially individual cases, being brought onto the floor of the parliament for public discussion. It is reprehensible. It is the case that there has been reporting on a particular case which is concerning to me. I have responded to that in a very responsible way bearing in mind the accountability that I have to be responsible in this area. I am always concerned if ever there are individual instances where people cannot get the medical care they need. I do not accept it if the Leader of the Opposition is suggesting otherwise. In any case this is a circumspect comment which is not about the individual case, I make that clear - I am able to say that my office has been in discussions with the Chief Psychiatrist and where there are complex cases, indeed very heart-rending cases, I am able to assure the House that the Chief Psychiatrist does have clinical oversight and opportunity to review and that he has not raised with me any concerns in this area about inappropriate treatment being given. Hospitals - Employment of Psychiatric Emergency Nurses Ms WHITE question to MINISTER for HEALTH, Mr FERGUSON [10.08 a.m.] The tragic story of a 15-year-old girl being held in seclusion at the adult psychiatric ward of the Royal Hobart Hospital has again highlighted the unacceptable lack of beds and services for children and adolescents suffering mental ill health in Tasmania. Last week a whistleblower from the child and adolescent mental health service provided a stark warning when they said, and I quote: 2 25 September 2018 Children will keep dying and very highly qualified professionals will be burned out and not work if the system does not change. The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation has been calling on your Government to fund a psychiatric emergency nurse at the North West Regional Hospital but you have refused. They have also asked for your Government to fund a psychiatric emergency nurse at the Launceston General Hospital but you have put so many restrictions around the terms of the contract that no-one has applied. Will you now reconsider and urgently act to fund a psychiatric emergency nurse at both the Launceston General Hospital and the North West Regional Hospital and match the commitment that Labor made at the state election? ANSWER Madam Speaker, mental health has a great commitment by this Hodgman Liberal majority government and we have the policies to prove it. I am surprised the Leader of the Opposition would ask the Government to match Labor's mental health policy. If we did that we would be doing 25 per cent of our commitment. Our Government does not have a $25 million mental health policy. We have a $95 million mental health policy and, importantly, we promised 25 additional beds while Labor has promised just 10 and could not say where they would be. I note in the question that the Leader of the Opposition again raises an individual case of a 15-year-old child, which I have already responded to. I also heard in the question a claim around the lack of inpatient service for children needing psychiatric care. Where was the care from Labor when they were in office? In 2009 the then minister for health, Lara Giddings, said it would be at least 12 months before the new paediatric mental health and adolescent unit was completed. In 2009 Labor held out hope that just a year after that there would be a service. We are now building the facility Labor never got around to. Ms White - What happened after that, nearly a decade ago? Is that the best you've got? Take some responsibility for this. What about the psychiatric emergency nurses? Mr FERGUSON - You want to change the subject and you do not like your history. Ms White - It was the question! Madam SPEAKER - Order. Mr FERGUSON - We are building the facilities and when they are open they will provide wonderful services to young people. Ms WHITE - Point of order, Madam Speaker, going to relevance. The question was about whether the minister would fund psychiatric emergency nurses at the North West Regional Hospital and the Launceston General Hospital. If you could draw his attention to answering the question I would be grateful. Mr FERGUSON - Madam Speaker, on that point of order I remind you and others that I am answering parts of the question that was asked. I am happy to get onto the psychiatric emergency nurses. 3 25 September 2018 Madam SPEAKER - Thank you, let us proceed. Mr FERGUSON - If Labor is uncomfortable with their failure in this area they ought to say sorry to Tasmanians. We are now building those facilities. I wish I could open them tomorrow. They are currently being built in the south - Mr O'BYRNE - What about the nurses? Madam SPEAKER - Order, Mr O'Byrne. Mr FERGUSON - and in the north and when they are finished we can all celebrate a service that is long overdue for Tasmanian families. I look forward to that day. Stop politicking about it. In relation to psychiatric emergency nurses - PENs - this Government came to the rescue for a PEN service at the Royal Hobart Hospital that the previous government left unfunded. We addressed that and stopped it from closing. The O'Byrne ministry in this area allowed the federal funding knowing it was coming to an end but did not provide an assurance it would be continued. We did that in one of our first budgets. I reject the allegation of the Leader of the Opposition in relation to the PEN service in the north because we have recently agreed to a 12-month trial at the Launceston General Hospital around this model.
Recommended publications
  • Police Award
    TASMANIAN INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION Industrial Relations Act 1984 s.23 application for award or variation of an award Police Association of Tasmania (T.2516 of 1990) (T.3119 of 1991) and Commissioner of Police (T4214 of 1993) POLICE AWARD PRESIDENT F. D. WESTWOOD 20 SEPTEMBER 1993 Award variation - restructuring and rates of pay - Structural Efficiency Principle - special case applications REASONS FOR DECISION Application T2516, lodged by the Police Association of Tasmania on 29 June 1990, was for an increase in "all salaries and skill/work related allowances" of 3 per cent as the second structural efficiency adjustment. On 3 July 1990 that application was referred to the Full Bench which was hearing a range of public sector matters in accordance with the Structural Efficiency Principle of the 1989 Wage Fixing Principles. The Association agreed to abide by Exhibit W2 in the conglomeration of public sector matters1 which established a series of conditions to be followed in concluding the structural efficiency exercise. With effect from the first full pay period to commence on or after 18 July 1990 the Police Award was varied to reflect the three percent second structural efficiency increase. On 7 August 1990, following an application from the Tasmanian Trades and Labour Council in Matter TA.70 of 1990, Anomalies Conference No. 23, the Police Award was granted the status of an "arguable special case" to enable the Association to pursue a work value claim in excess of the six per cent available by way of the Structural Efficiency Principle. Subsequently, on 7 June 1991, the Association, after industrial action by its members seeking to convince the employer that parity with rates of pay for police in other States should be conceded, made the necessary application2 relevant to its arguable special case claim.
    [Show full text]
  • St Johns Burial Ground New Town, Hobart Tasmania, Rosemary Davidson
    TASMANIAN FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY INC. PO Box 191 Launceston Tasmania 7250 State Secretary: [email protected] Journal Editor: [email protected] Home Page: http://www.tasfhs.org Patron: Dr Alison Alexander Fellows: Dr Neil Chick and Mr David Harris Executive: President Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Vice President Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Vice President Peter Cocker (03) 6435 4103 State Secretary Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 State Treasurer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Committee: Kerrie Blyth John Gillham Jim Rouse Judy Cocker Libby Gillham Margaret Strempel Sandra Duck Leo Prior Robert Tanner By-laws Officer (vacant) Assistant By-laws Officer Maurice Appleyard (03) 6248 4229 Webmaster Robert Tanner (03) 6231 0794 Journal Editors Anita Swan (03) 6326 5778 Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 LWFHA Coordinator Anita Swan (03) 6394 8456 Members’ Interests Compiler Jim Rouse (03) 6239 6529 Membership Registrar Muriel Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Publications Convenor Bev Richardson (03) 6225 3292 Public Officer Colleen Read (03) 6244 4527 State Sales Officer Betty Bissett (03) 6344 4034 Branches of the Society Burnie: PO Box 748 Burnie Tasmania 7320 [email protected] Devonport: PO Box 267 Latrobe Tasmania 7307 [email protected] Hobart: PO Box 326 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 [email protected] Huon: PO Box 117 Huonville Tasmania 7109 [email protected] Launceston: PO Box 1290 Launceston Tasmania 7250 [email protected] Volume 30 Number 1 June 2009 ISSN 0159 0677 Contents From the editor ............................................................................................................... 2 President’s Message ....................................................................................................... 3 Branch Reports .............................................................................................................. 4 13th AFFHO Congress Auckland January 2009, Dianne Snowden ............................... 7 The Road to Sandy Bay Leads to Hell on Sundays, Sally Rackham ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • 22 October 2017 the Principal Research Officer Select Committee
    EOLC Sub 680 Rec'd 22/10/2017 22 October 2017 The Principal Research Officer Select Committee on End of Life Choices Legislative Assembly Parliament House PERTH WA 6000 Email [email protected] Dear Principal Research Officer RE WHY EUTHANASIA HAS NO PLACE IN AUSTRALIA WHY EUTHANASIA SUPPORTERS MUST FALL ON THEIR OWN SWORD WHY EUTHANASIA IN ANY OF ITS FORMS SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED WHY EUTHANASIA MUST NOT SEE THE SUNSET ON THIS, THE LONGEST DAY My name is David Foletta. I am a solicitor admitted to practice in the State of New South Wales. MY SUBMISSIONS It is my pleasure to make submissions to the Inquiry into the need for laws in Western Australia to allow citizens to make informed decisions regarding their own end of life choices (Inquiry). MY POSITION ON EUTHANASIA I oppose all forms of euthanasia. EVANGELICALISM NOT THE ONLY REASON FOR OPPOSITION I hold to a Christian ethic, however, as the committee will see, I hold opposition for reasons that people who have a range of responses to questions of theology could also agree with. CONSENT TO PUBLICATION I give my consent to the public disclosure of this letter, the email serving this letter and all attachments to this letter. In my respectful submission, I actually consider that the public disclosure of the contents of my submissions is vital to the safeguarding of people in Western Australia and by consequence, all people around Australia. IN PERSON ATTENDANCE AT PUBLIC HEARING I am willing to travel to Western Australia to attend a public hearing in person.
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmania: Majority Or Minority Government? *
    AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Tasmania: Majority or Minority Government? * Michael Lester and Dain Bolwell PhD Candidate, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Tasmania Associate, Institute for the Study of Social Change, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Tasmania * Double-blind reviewed article. INTRODUCTION While the outcome of the March 2018 Tasmanian State Election was predictable,1 the controversies that dogged the campaign were not. Yet it was the aftermath of the election that was most astonishing—not only to the public but also to members of Cabinet. Tasmania is different. Its parliamentary institutions are unusual and its electoral system is distinctive. So were the issues on which the March 2018 state election was fought. In the lead up to the election both major parties campaigned to govern alone or not at all—neither in minority nor in coalition with the Greens. As well as this apparently overarching concern, there were three other major issues prominent during the campaign—an acute housing shortage, the thousands of poker machines in pubs and clubs, and the surprise matter of gun control. Health, education, law and order, the economy and who would best manage the budget were, as usual, also policy battle grounds; however, the minority government fear campaign, a television blitz on the benefits of poker machines and considerable 1 N. Miragliotta, ‘As Tasmania Looks Likely to Have Minority Government, The Greens Must Decide How to Play Their Hand’, The Conversation, 26 February 2018. Accessed at: https://theconversation.com/as-tasmania-looks- likely-to-have-minority-government-the-greens-must-decide-how-to-play-their-hand-91985.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Youth Crime out of Control' : Is It Reality of Media Hype?
    "Youth Crime out of Control": Is it reality or media hype? A Tasmanian perspective on the print media's portrayal of Youth Crime and Ashley Youth Detention Centre. By Peter John Barr Bachelor of Applied Science (Psychology) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the degree of Masters of Criminology and Corrections School of Sociology and Social Work University of Tasmania November 2011 STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY OF ACCESS This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Peter Barr DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis. Peter Barr I Abstract As an employee at Ashley Youth Detention Centre (AYDC) I have been a keen follower of the Tasmanian media's portrayal of crime generally and youthful offending and AYDC specifically, for 17 years. During that time I have literally read hundreds of Tasmanian media stories relating to youth crime or AYDC and from that had developed the anecdotal view that the Tasmanian print media's reporting of crime, youth crime and AYDC is generally biased. In order to test that hypothesis I reviewed every Tasmanian newsprint article written on youth crime and AYDC during the period July 2007 to June 2009. In all there were 267 articles from the three Tasmanian newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • TLP 2011 Year Book
    Partners TASMANIAN LEADERS YEARBOOK 2011 www.tasmanianleaders.org.au TASMANIAN LEADERS YEARBOOK 2011 CONTENTS OUR MISSION ...................................................................................................................................................3 OUR VALUES ......................................................................................................................................................4 ABOUT TASMANIAN LEADERS INC .................................................................................................5 ABOUT THE TASMANIAN LEADERS ProGRAM .....................................................................5 ProGRAM OUTCOMES ............................................................................................................................6 MESSAGE From THE CHAIR ..................................................................................................................8 REFLECTIONS ON THE TLP JOURNEY BY DEAN MUNDEY ........................................10 Employer ENDORSEMENTS OF TLP ..........................................................................................42 2011 COMMUNITY Projects ..........................................................................................................44 Skillsbank .....................................................................................................................................................48 LEADERSHIP CHAMPIONS ...................................................................................................................49
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday 8 June 2016 - Estimates Committee a (Hidding)
    UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Wednesday 8 June 2016 - Estimates Committee A (Hidding) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ESTIMATES COMMITTEE A Wednesday 8 June 2016 MEMBERS Mr Farrell Ms Forrest Mr Gaffney Mr Hall (Chair) Mrs Hiscutt Mr Mulder IN ATTENDANCE Hon. Rene Hidding MP, Minister for Infrastructure, Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Management Department of Police and Emergency Management Darren Hine, Secretary DPEM and Commissioner of Police Scott Tilyard, Deputy Commissioner of Police Chris Arnol, Chief Officer, TFS Gavin Freeman, Deputy Chief Officer, TFS Glenn Frame, Assistant Commissioner of Police Richard Cowling, Assistant Commissioner of Police Donna Adams, Deputy Secretary, Business and Executive Services, DPFEM Nicholas Wilson, Acting Director, State Emergency Service Scott Wilson-Haffenden, Director, Information Services and Communications Technology Marijke Harris, Assistant Manager, Finance and Payroll Services, Business and Executive Services Tasmania Fire Service Chris Arnol, Chief Officer Gavin Freeman, Deputy Chief Officer Sandra Whight, Manager, Fuel Reduction Unit Estimates A 1 Wednesday 8 June 2016 - Hidding UNCORRECTED PROOF ISSUE Department of State Growth Kim Evans, Secretary Gary Swain, Deputy Secretary Policy and Strategy Allan Garcia, CEO Infrastructure Tasmania Penny Nicholls, General Manager Road User Services Shane Gregory, General Manager State Road Services Glen Dean, Finance Director Lia Morris, Chief Executive of Marine and Safety Tasmania Ministerial Office Richard Wilson, Chief of Staff Randolph Wierenga, Senior Adviser Carol Jones, Adviser The committee met at 9 a.m. CHAIR (Mr Hall) - Welcome all. Mr HIDDING - Chair, you might notice our acting director of SES is not present today. Can we take it that we give him a leave pass. He is busy fighting floods.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunns' Proposed Tamar Valley Pulp
    GUNNS’ PROPOSED TAMAR VALLEY PULP MILL SAGA: Timeline of Key Events: 2003 - 2017 The saga of the pulp mill began in June 2003 with then Deputy Premier Paul Lennon spotted having dinner with John Gay, CEO of Gunns Limited, with documents sighted on the table which referred to a proposal to build a pulp mill. Following that revelation both the State and Federal Labor and Liberal parties were in lock-step support for the pulp mill despite growing community outrage and dissent. Below are a few key ‘highlights’ over the last 14 years that the toxic pulp mill cloud has hung over Tasmania, blighting Tasmanian politics, community, and reputation. ▪ June 2003 – Gunns’ intentions for a pulp mill were leaked to then-Greens Leader Peg Putt, who subsequently ‘blew the whistle’ on the plans by raising the matter in the State Parliament. ▪ November 2003 - guidelines for the mill were released by the government. ▪ June 2004 – revised environmental guidelines for a pulp mill in Tasmania released. ▪ June 2004 – Media reports that “Prime Minister John Howard has promised $5 million to Tasmanian timber giant Gunns Ltd if it goes ahead with its proposed $1 billion pulp mill.” ▪ August 2004 – Lennon Labor government announced that a pulp mill “co-ordinating unit” would be housed within the Department of Economic Development. The Unit would be headed by Mr Bob Gordon, formerly the Forestry Tasmania General Manager of Marketing, and would be known as the Pulp Mill Taskforce. ▪ November 2004 – Premier Lennon announces the Gunns’ pulp mill proposal to be assessed as a Project of State Significance under the State Policies and Projects Act 1993 (at Gunns Ltd’s request), ▪ November 2004 – also revealed that Forestry Tasmania and Gunns Ltd had entered into a pulp mill wood supply agreement before any pulp mill plans were made public.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2012: Justice and Community Safety
    ACT Justice and Community Safety Directorate, ACT Government Solicitor and ACT Magistrates Court ADMINISTRATION OF APPLICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THEVICTIMS OF CRIME (FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE) ACT 1983 May 2012 Report by the Acting ACT Ombudsman, Alison Larkins, under the Ombudsman Act 1989 REPORT NO. 01|2012 Reports by the Ombudsman Under the Ombudsman Act 1989 (ACT), the Australian Capital Territory Ombudsman investigates the administrative actions of Australian Capital Territory Government agencies and officers. An investigation can be conducted as a result of a complaint or on the initiative (or own motion) of the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman also has specific responsibilities under the Ombudsman Act 1976 (Cth) for matters regarding the Australian Federal Police, the Freedom of Information Act 1989 (ACT) and is authorised to deal with whistleblower complaints under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1994 (ACT). Most complaints to the Ombudsman are resolved without the need for a formal finding or report. The above Acts provide (in similar terms) that the Ombudsman can culminate an investigation by preparing a report containing the opinions and recommendations of the Ombudsman. A report can be prepared if the Ombudsman is of the opinion that the administrative action under investigation was unlawful, unreasonable, unjust, oppressive, improperly discriminatory, or otherwise wrong or unsupported by the facts; was not properly explained by an agency; or was based on a law that was unreasonable, unjust, oppressive or improperly discriminatory. A report by the Ombudsman is forwarded to the agency concerned and the responsible minister. If the recommendations in the report are not accepted, the Ombudsman can choose to furnish the report to the ACT Chief Minister or the ACT Legislative Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook 2020
    Yearbook 2020 Welcome from the Chair .......................................................... 2 Our purpose ......................................................................................... 4 What we do .......................................................................................... 4 Our guiding principles ................................................................. 4 Strategic direction 2020 – 2024 .............................................. 5 Message from the Chief Executive Officer ................... 6 I-LEAD 2020 .........................................................................................8 TLP14 2020 The program .................................................................................. 12 The graduates .............................................................................20 Learning Set Projects ..........................................................42 Valedictory speech ................................................................44 Employer testimonials .......................................................46 Tasmanian Leaders Network ................................................48 Tasmanian Leaders Foundation .........................................50 Thinkbank: Leading to a brighter future .....................50 Skillsbank and graduate search ......................................... 52 Tasmanian Leaders Board members ..............................53 Leadership + Trust Symposium .......................................... 54 Tasmanian Way ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Government Services Volume 1
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA Budget Paper No 2 Government Services Volume 1 Presented by Lara Giddings MP, Treasurer, for the information of Honourable Members, on the occasion of the Budget, 2011-12 Useful 2011-12 Budget and Government Websites www.budget.tas.gov.au Contains the Budget Papers. www.treasury.tas.gov.au Provides other Budget and financial publications. www.media.tas.gov.au Contains the Government's Budget related media releases. www.tas.gov.au Provides links to the Websites of a wide range of Tasmanian public and private sector organisations. www.service.tas.gov.au Provides a comprehensive entry point to Government services in Tasmania. www.tasmaniatogether.tas.gov.au Provides detailed information on Tasmania Together, including the current status of this important initiative. CONTENTS VOLUME 1 1 Introduction PART 1: DEPARTMENTS 2 Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts 3 Department of Education 4 Finance-General 5 Department of Health and Human Services 6 Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources 7 Department of Justice VOLUME 2 PART 1: DEPARTMENTS (CONTINUED) 8 Ministerial and Parliamentary Support 9 Department of Police and Emergency Management 10 Department of Premier and Cabinet 11 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment 12 Department of Treasury and Finance PART 2: AGENCIES 13 House of Assembly 14 Integrity Commission 15 Legislative Council 16 Legislature-General 17 Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions i 18 Office of the Governor 19 Office of the Ombudsman 20 Tasmanian
    [Show full text]
  • David Bartlett MP
    Inaugural Speech – David Bartlett MP David Bartlett MP House of Assembly Date: 20 April 2004 Electorate: Denison FORMER PREMIER, MR JIM BACON Mr LENNON (Franklin - Premier - Motion) - Mr Speaker, I move - That the House – (1) Places on record its deep appreciation to the former Premier, Jim Bacon, for his outstanding contribution to the Tasmanian people as a member of Parliament from 1996 until 2004, as Leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party from 1997 to 2004 and as Premier of the State from 1998 to 2004. (2) Pays tribute to a great Tasmanian and wishes him and his wife, Honey, the very best for the future. Mr Speaker, at the outset I want to thank the Leader of the Opposition and the Leader of the Tasmanian Greens for agreeing to allow David Bartlett to speak at the end of my contribution and, of course, it will be his maiden speech in this House. Mr SPEAKER - The honourable member for Denison, Mr Bartlett, on his inaugural speech. [3.38 p.m.] Mr BARTLETT (Denison - Inaugural) - Thank you, Mr Speaker, and thanks to the two Leaders of the opposition parties for their indulgence and the indulgence of my family and friends who are waiting patiently in the Gallery. Mr Speaker, it is of course with mixed feelings that I rise today to deliver my inaugural speech. Each of us here who have aspired to a seat in this House have probably anticipated this moment and savoured it when it has arrived, however it would be remiss of me not to pause to reflect on my path here and the unfortunate circumstances that have undoubtedly led to this moment.
    [Show full text]