Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 8 Year Program Review – Self-Study Outline University of Connecticut DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY & EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY 8 YEAR PROGRAM REVIEW SELF-STUDY 2012 1 8 Year Program Review – Self-Study Outline Executive Summary Highlight the most salient points of this self-study. Place particular emphasis on new directions and remediation of existing problems. (OIR program review data are attached in Appendix ES1) The goal of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB) at the University of Connecticut (UConn) is for its Faculty members to be the leaders of their fields. As evidenced by our enhanced standing in the recent NRC rankings relative to previously designated peer and target institutions, our program has improved substantially since our last review (Appendix ES2). EEB is a strong, vital, and professionally active group of committed researchers, teachers, graduate students and post-docs. Members of the Department are highly productive and influential scholars. Since 2005 EEB faculty have published 658 peer-reviewed articles in leading journals and 111 book chapters. They have authored 16 books and edited another 13 and have garnered more than 53,000 citations to their work. Active extramural awards during this period totaled $28,363,819 (~$75,000,000 if non-UConn funds are included)—a 63% increase in external support over the review period. EEB engages in research collaborations with colleagues across multiple UConn Colleges, Schools and Departments, and at institutions across the U.S. and the world. Our commitment to professional service is extensive, with faculty members holding an unusually large number of influential positions in professional societies and journals, as well as a major presence on federal review panels. EEB faculty members are routinely selected for leadership roles within the University. Since 2005, these have included Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Education, Interim Dean of the Graduate School, Chairs of 11 University Committees and as members of dozens of other University and College committees. Nearly all of our mid- and upper-level courses are taught by tenure-track faculty. Departmental means on student evaluations, particularly in upper division courses, are routinely above those of the University. We maintain a signification investment in time-consuming laboratory courses, believing strongly that organismal biologists should be broadly trained. We contribute significantly to courses fulfilling the General Education mission of the University. EEB is responsible for the majority of the introductory biology lab courses, providing 55% of all introductory biology seats offered by the 3 biology departments since 2005 and teaching 55% of all “W”-students in the life sciences (W-courses fulfill the University’s writing requirement). We have responded proactively to an unprecedented increase in the total number of students majoring in biology, generally, and in our own major, as well (both of which have doubled since 2005). EEB is heavily invested in undergraduate research and the Honors program, with faculty members having supervised over 300 research undergraduates in their laboratories (56 completing theses, 49 of them Honors) and many of them co-authoring publications. Comparisons with peer and target institutions, and the other biology departments at UConn, indicate that our teaching commitments are large. We are particularly proud of our graduate program. Feedback from graduate students suggests that our graduate teaching (combining individual mentorship with seminars and lecture courses) is highly successful. NRC data show that the completion rate and time to degree of our graduate students exceeds that of almost all of our peer and target institutions. 82% of our Ph.D. students graduating since 2005 hold professional positions related to their field. Since 2005 our graduate students have earned 25 extramural awards, including NSF Pre-doctoral, EPA Star, NASA and Switzer Fellowships, plus Fulbright awards, NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement grants and numerous professional society awards. The Department is home to an average of 20 post-docs per year, 55 in total since 2005; 91% of the 35 no longer in residence have gone on academic or other positions in science. Public engagement activities range from local and regional efforts to high-profile projects in South America and Africa. While active and successful in traditional outreach venues, EEB has also established a significant presence in cyberspace, educating the public via blogs, social medial and numerous websites. Space has improved substantially for a subset of our faculty since our last review, with 15 faculty members now housed in the new Pharmacy/Biology building. Unfortunately, the rest remain in poor space within the Torrey Life Sciences building (see below). 2 8 Year Program Review – Self-Study Outline Our Vision and its Limitations: We feel that EEB is at a cusp. To this point the faculty have been sincere, united and energetic in their efforts to make the Department an international leader in organismal biology. We have shared a vision of excellence as something always to strive for, but never quite attain, and thus we rise towards an ever-higher bar. As individuals we feel empowered, not diminished, when each new hire is better than we are, and thus we as a whole are better. By many of the metrics used to evaluate scholarship and productivity, we exceed our peers. But we are exhausted. Our investment in the University has not been matched by the University’s investment in us. Structural problems identified in the previous review remain. Faculty effort and workloads are approaching an asymptote and morale is eroding. Without a serious University commitment to our program, the progress we have made will stall and we fear we will regress towards the mean. The principal outcomes of this self-study have been the documentation that we truly are doing more than ever and the revelation and clarification of impediments to our further advancement. If we are to move to the level of our target institutions we need to resolve several issues, some raised by the previous review and some newly emerged. Principal among these are (1) a steadily increasing administrative load, (2) an alarmingly top-heavy faculty, (3) inequitable and inadequate space, (4) constraints on graduate recruitment, and (5) an unsupportive environment for the care of our non-model research animals. (1) The time available to faculty members for innovative and competitive research is steadily eroding owing to excessive ‘businessification’ of University practices. Responsibility for paperwork (e.g., travel, purchasing and grant accounting) continues to shift from staff to faculty while requirements for more reports, more explicit accounting for time, more mandated training sessions and more emphasis on contractual agreements, skyrocket. This wasteful use of faculty members’ time diminishes their ability— and commitment—to making EEB and UConn the best they can be. The return of a lost office staff position would help to relieve this administrative strain. (2) The number of tenured faculty members has decreased by 2 since 2005, despite substantial increases in undergraduate enrollments, with the student-to-faculty ratio rising from 71:1 to 103:1. Two new hires (one starting 2013, one search ongoing) will return us to our 2005 number, but given the impending retirement of 2 senior faculty members, improvement will be very short-term. Multiple years of University hiring freezes, have left our faculty exceptionally top-heavy (76% are, or will soon be, Full Professors and only two—including our newest hire—are Assistant Professors). Implementation of our cluster hire proposal for 6 junior faculty members in Biodiversity and Global Change would help to return balance to departmental demographics. (3) The quality and quantity of EEB space is starkly dichotomous, with half the department in the new Pharmacy/Biology building (PBB) and the other half in the decaying Torrey Life Sciences building (TLS). The last minute, unannounced elimination of a planned bridge between PBB and TLS has fragmented the department, causing an erosion of departmental cohesion. We are encouraged by the President’s recent efforts to obtain funding for a new building, but also recognize that even if successful, it cannot address departmental space needs for many years. (4) Our graduate program has remained static at ~48 students and the number of TAs has not kept pace with the doubling of undergraduate enrollment. NRC data show that EEB’s average number of University- supported students per faculty member (0.63) is lower than 5 of 9 peer and target institutions. We continue to see a decline in our ability to recruit some of our best applicants because our competitors offer evermore attractive support packages. Enhancement of our graduate program requires additional student support, particularly the availability of full fellowships, summer support and a larger TA pool. But, we are about to implement a new model of TA assignments in introductory biology that we believe will help to mitigate our present shortage. (5) EEB experimentalists often study non-model species requiring animal care. The Office of Animal Care (OAC) continues to impede work on such ‘exotic’ animals. Three faculty members have now been forced to change their research programs as a result of this lack of support. 3 8 Year Program Review – Self-Study Outline A. Unit Description, Mission, Goals, and Recent History Note: Relevant data are provided
Recommended publications
  • Scrub Mint Dicerandra Frutescens Shinners
    Scrub Mint Dicerandra frutescens Shinners he scrub mint is a small, fragrant shrub that inhabits Federal Status: Endangered (Nov. 1, 1985) the scrub of central peninsular Florida. It bears a Critical Habitat: None Designated Tstrong resemblance to another Dicerandra species, Florida Status: Endangered Garretts mint, but can be differentiated by its scent, the Recovery Plan Status: Revision (May 18, 1999) color of its flowers, and the size of its leaves. Loss of habitat due to residential and agricultural development (particularly Geographic Coverage: Rangewide for citrus groves), as well as fire suppression in tracts of remaining habitat, are the principle threats to this plant. This account represents a revision of the existing Figure 1. County distribution of scrub mint. recovery plan for the scrub mint (FWS 1987). Description The scrub mint is a dense or straggly, low-growing shrub (Kral, 1983). It reaches 50 cm in height and grows from a deep, stout, spreading-branching taproot. Its branches are mostly spreading, and sometimes are prostrate. Its shoots have two forms, one which is strictly leafy and overwintering, and another which is flowering and dies back after fruiting. The leaves vary in shape. They can be narrowly oblong- elliptic, linear-elliptic, or linear-oblanceolate (Kral 1983). The upper surface of the leaves is dark green, with the midrib slightly impressed. The lower surface is slightly paler, with the midrib slightly raised. They are 1.5 to 2.5 cm long, 2 to 3 mm wide, subsessile, flattish but somewhat fleshy, narrowly or broadly rounded at the apical end, have entire margins, and are not revolute.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2016/102490 Al 30 June 2016 (30.06.2016) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2016/102490 Al 30 June 2016 (30.06.2016) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07D 333/12 (2006.01) A01N 43/40 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, C07D 405/12 (2006.01) A01N 43/54 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, C07D 409/12 (2006.01) A01N 43/72 (2006.01) BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, A0 43/10 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (21) International Application Number: KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, PCT/EP20 15/08083 1 MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, (22) International Filing Date: PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, 2 1 December 2015 (21 .12.2015) SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (30) Priority Data: GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, 62/095,077 22 December 2014 (22.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcodes for Bio-Surveillance
    Page 1 of 44 DNA Barcodes for Bio-surveillance: Regulated and Economically Important Arthropod Plant Pests Muhammad Ashfaq* and Paul D.N. Hebert Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada * Corresponding author: Muhammad Ashfaq Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada Email: [email protected] Phone: (519) 824-4120 Ext. 56393 Genome Downloaded from www.nrcresearchpress.com by 99.245.208.197 on 09/06/16 1 For personal use only. This Just-IN manuscript is the accepted prior to copy editing and page composition. It may differ from final official version of record. Page 2 of 44 Abstract Many of the arthropod species that are important pests of agriculture and forestry are impossible to discriminate morphologically throughout all of their life stages. Some cannot be differentiated at any life stage. Over the past decade, DNA barcoding has gained increasing adoption as a tool to both identify known species and to reveal cryptic taxa. Although there has not been a focused effort to develop a barcode library for them, reference sequences are now available for 77% of the 409 species of arthropods documented on major pest databases. Aside from developing the reference library needed to guide specimen identifications, past barcode studies have revealed that a significant fraction of arthropod pests are a complex of allied taxa. Because of their importance as pests and disease vectors impacting global agriculture and forestry, DNA barcode results on these arthropods have significant implications for quarantine detection, regulation, and management.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Host-Specific Clades of Tetraphyllidean
    International Journal for Parasitology 29 (1999) 1465±1476 Evidence for host-speci®c clades of tetraphyllidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes: Eucestoda) revealed by analysis of 18S ssrDNAp P.D. Olson a, b,*, T.R. Ruhnke c, J. Sanney c, T. Hudson c aThe Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, Division of Parasitic Worms, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK bUniversity of Connecticut, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, U-43, 75 No. Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269-3043, USA cWest Virginia State College, Department of Biology, Institute, WV 25112-1000, USA Received 12 April 1999; received in revised form 22 June 1999; accepted 22 June 1999 Abstract Sequence data from the V4 and V7±V9 variable regions of the 18S small subunit ribosomal DNA (ssrDNA) gene were used to examine relationships among 26 tetraphyllidean and two lecanicephalidean taxa. Newly collected specimens of 21 of the tetraphyllidean species were used to generate ssrDNA sequences that were combined with sequences previously available, including those of two diphyllidean taxa used for outgroup rooting. The sequences were aligned by eye according to secondary structural motifs of the conserved core of the molecule. Of the 1520 sites in the alignment, 874 (58%) were excluded from analysis due to alignment gaps and lack of positional homology as inferred by manual inspection. Genetic variability of the ssrDNA gene regions compared was greater than would be expected, based on the present taxonomy of the ingroup species, and the genetic divergences among tetraphyllidean `families' and genera were comparable to that among tapeworm orders. Phylogenetic hypotheses were generated by the methods of maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood (GTR + I + G nucleotide substitution model).
    [Show full text]
  • Extrapolating Demography with Climate, Proximity and Phylogeny: Approach with Caution
    ! ∀#∀#∃ %& ∋(∀∀!∃ ∀)∗+∋ ,+−, ./ ∃ ∋∃ 0∋∀ /∋0 0 ∃0 . ∃0 1##23%−34 ∃−5 6 Extrapolating demography with climate, proximity and phylogeny: approach with caution Shaun R. Coutts1,2,3, Roberto Salguero-Gómez1,2,3,4, Anna M. Csergő3, Yvonne M. Buckley1,3 October 31, 2016 1. School of Biological Sciences. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science. The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. 2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK. 3. School of Natural Sciences, Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. 4. Evolutionary Demography Laboratory. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Rostock, DE-18057, Germany. Keywords: COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database, comparative demography, damping ratio, elasticity, matrix population model, phylogenetic analysis, population growth rate (λ), spatially lagged models Author statement: SRC developed the initial concept, performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RSG helped develop the initial concept, provided code for deriving de- mographic metrics and phylogenetic analysis, and provided the matrix selection criteria. YMB helped develop the initial concept and advised on analysis. All authors made substantial contributions to editing the manuscript and further refining ideas and interpretations. 1 Distance and ancestry predict demography 2 ABSTRACT Plant population responses are key to understanding the effects of threats such as climate change and invasions. However, we lack demographic data for most species, and the data we have are often geographically aggregated. We determined to what extent existing data can be extrapolated to predict pop- ulation performance across larger sets of species and spatial areas. We used 550 matrix models, across 210 species, sourced from the COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database, to model how climate, geographic proximity and phylogeny predicted population performance.
    [Show full text]
  • FRANJE 36 Najaar 2015
    FRANJE Jaargang 18 (36) september 2015 ISSN: 1388-4409 Mededelingen uit de Secties “Snellen” en “Ter Haar” van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging Franje 18 (36) – september 2015 Colofon Franje is het gezamenlijke contactorgaan van de secties “Snellen” en “Ter Haar” van de Nederlandse Entomologische Vereniging en verschijnt twee maal per jaar. Logo: Cosmopterix zieglerella door Sjaak Koster Redactie : Maurice Jansen. Redactieadres : Maurice Jansen, Appelgaard 9, 4033 JA Lienden. Tel: 0344-603758 (privé), 06-46318831 (werk); e-mail: [email protected] (werk); [email protected] (privé) Bestuur sectie Snellen: E-mail: [email protected] voorzitter: Tymo Muus, Hogewal 137, 8331 WP Steenwijk 06-20358505. secretaris : Camiel Doorenweerd, Zonneveldstraat 10A, 2311 RV Leiden penningmeester : Remco Vos, Minstreelpad 79, 3766 BS Soest lid: . Violet Middelman, Minstreelpad 79, 3766 BS Soest. Tel: 06-11268833 Bestuur sectie Ter Haar: voorzitter : Siep Sinnema, Sparjeburd 29, 8409 CK Hemrik, tel: 0516-471222; e-mail: [email protected] secretaris : Hans Groenewoud, Hatertseweg 620, 6535 ZZ Nijmegen, tel: 024-3541725; e-mail: [email protected] penningmeester : Penningmeester: Mathilde Groenendijk, Doorneberglaan 287, 1974 NK IJmuiden, e-mail: [email protected]. lid : Sandra Lamberts, Bergstraat 39, 1931 EN Egmond aan zee; tel: 06-57104851; e- mail: [email protected] lid : Gerrit Tuinstra, De Twee Gebroeders 214, 9207 CB Drachten. Tel. 0512-518246; e- mail: [email protected] Lidmaatschap voor leden van Snellen : € 9,- per jaar, bij voorkeur te voldoen op banknummer (IBAN) NL85 INGB 0006 6797 53 t.n.v. Sectie Snellen in Soest. Dit onder vermelding van ‘Contributie Snellen’ en het jaartal.
    [Show full text]
  • AAVP 1995 Annual Meeting Proceedings
    Joint Meeting of The American Society of Parasitologists & The American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists July 6 july 1 0, 1995 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2 ! j THE AMERICAN SOCIETY - OF PARASITOLOGISTS - & THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VETERINARY PARASITOLOGISTS ACKNOWLEDGE THEFOLLO~GCO~ANlliS FOR THEIR FINANCIAL SUPPORT: CORPORATE EVENT SPONSOR: PFIZER ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATE SPONSORS: BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ANIMAL HEALTH, INC. MALUNCKRODT VETERINARY, INC. THE UPJOHN CO. MEETING SPONSORS: AMERICAN CYANAMID CO. CIBA ANIMAL HEALTH ELl LILLY & CO. FERMENT A ANIMAL HEALTH HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC. HOECHST-ROUSSEL AGRI-VET CO. IDEXX LABORATORIES, INC. MIDWEST VETERINARY SERVICES, INC. PARA VAX, INC. PROFESSIONAL LABORATORIES & RESEARCH SERVICES RHONE MERIEUX, INC. SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH, INC. SUMITOMO CHEMICAL, LTO. SYNBIOTICS CORP. TRS LABS, INC. - - I I '1---.. --J 3 Announcing a Joint Meeting of THE AMERICAN SOCIETY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION Of OF PARASITOLOGISTS VETERINARY PARASITOLOGISTS (70th Meeting) (40th Meeting) Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania july 6-1 0, 1995 INFORMATION & REGISTRATION Hyatt Regency Hotel, 112 Washington Place THURSDAY Regency foyer, 2nd Floor t July 6th Registration Begins, Noon-5:00 p.m. FRIDAY Regency foyer, 2nd Floor t July 7th 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. SATURDAY Regency foyer, 2nd Floor july 8th 8:00 a.m.-5:00p.m. SUNDAY Regency foyer, 2nd Floor july 9th 8:00 a.m.-Noon t Items for the Auction may be delivered to this location before 3:00p.m. on Friday, july 7th. 4 WELCOME RECEPTION Thursday, july 6th 7:00-1 0:00 p.m. Grand Ballroom SOCIAl, MATCH THE FACES & AUCTION Friday, July 7th Preview: 6:30-7:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Incurvariidae) with Two New Species from China and Japan
    Zootaxa 4927 (2): 209–233 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4927.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:96B9981B-01B5-4828-A4C6-E2E4A08DB8F2 Review of the genus Vespina (Lepidoptera, Incurvariidae) with two new species from China and Japan TOSHIYA HIROWATARI1*, SADAHISA YAGI1, ISSEI OHSHIMA2, GUO-HUA HUANG3 & MIN WANG4 1Entomological laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395 Japan. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-1219 2Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, 606-8522 Japan. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-9749 3Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory for Biology and Control of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-0095 4Department of Entomology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5834-4058 *Corresponding author. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6839-2229 Abstract Asian species of the genus Vespina Davis, 1972 (Lepidoptera, Incurvariidae) are mainly reviewed. Vespina meridiana Hirowatari & Yagi sp. nov. from the Ryukyu Islands, Japan, and Vespina sichuana Hirowatari, Huang & Wang sp. nov. from Sichuan, China, are described. The previously known Vespina species are associated with plants from the Fagaceae family on the western coast of the USA and East Asia and with Sapindaceae (Aceraceae) in eastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Phylogenetic Significance of the 71-Kb Inversion
    Annals of Botany 99: 747–753, 2007 doi:10.1093/aob/mcm010, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org Distribution and Phylogenetic Significance of the 71-kb Inversion in the Plastid Genome in Funariidae (Bryophyta) BERNARD GOFFINET1,*, NORMAN J. WICKETT1 , OLAF WERNER2 , ROSA MARIA ROS2 , A. JONATHAN SHAW3 and CYMON J. COX3,† 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 75 North Eagleville Road, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3043, USA, 2Universidad de Murcia, Facultad de Biologı´a, Departamento de Biologı´a Vegetal, Campus de Espinardo, 30100-Murcia, Spain and 3Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Received: 31 October 2006 Revision requested: 21 November 2006 Accepted: 21 December 2006 Published electronically: 2 March 2007 † Background and Aims The recent assembly of the complete sequence of the plastid genome of the model taxon Physcomitrella patens (Funariaceae, Bryophyta) revealed that a 71-kb fragment, encompassing much of the large single copy region, is inverted. This inversion of 57% of the genome is the largest rearrangement detected in the plastid genomes of plants to date. Although initially considered diagnostic of Physcomitrella patens, the inversion was recently shown to characterize the plastid genome of two species from related genera within Funariaceae, but was lacking in another member of Funariidae. The phylogenetic significance of the inversion has remained ambiguous. † Methods Exemplars of all families included in Funariidae were surveyed. DNA sequences spanning the inversion break ends were amplified, using primers that anneal to genes on either side of the putative end points of the inver- sion. Primer combinations were designed to yield a product for either the inverted or the non-inverted architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Broad-Headed Bugs (Alydidae)
    Chapter 18 Broad-Headed Bugs (Alydidae) Antônio R. Panizzi and Carl w. Schaefer Abstract The broad-headed bugs (Alydidae) are divided into two subfamilies, Alydinaeand Micrelytrinae, each divided into two tribes, Daclerini and Alydini, and Micrelytriniand Leptocorisini, respectively, The farnily has 53 genera and about 250 specieins; the Neotropics, there are 21 genera. Alydids are small (8-20 mm), slen- Itr,with a triangular head; nymphs of alydines mimic ants, the adults of some Micrelytrinialso rnirnic ants. The most studied species in the Neotropics is the aly- dineNeomegalotomus parvus (Westwood), usually associated with legumes, and maybe a pest on soybean. Other common genera include Hyalymenus Amyot & Serville,Stenocoris Burmeister, Cydamus Stâl, and Trachelium Herrich-Schâffer. Studieson taxonomy and bioecology on alydids of the Neotropics are needed. 18.1 Introduction AlydidaeAmyot and Serville, 1843, were treated as a subfarnily of the farnily Coreidaeand even as a tribe (Schaffner 1964); now it has been treated as a farnily, ~ether with Coreidae, Rhopalidae, Hyocephalidae, and Stenocephalidae, in the !UperfarniCoreoidealy (Schaefer 1964). Thisfarnily contains 53 genera and approximately 250 species, mostly tropical Irsubtropical,in all regions of the world. There are only two genera that span both dleOldand the New World, Alydus and Megalotomus. These genera are Holarctic, IInAlydus extends from Alaska through Canada into Mexico (Brailovsky and Flores 1979;Froeschner 1988; Maw et al. 2000). The genera of Alydinae have been revised by Schaffner (1964; 22 species worldwide);the world genera of the subfamily Micrelytrinae, tribe Leptocorisini, were CarlW.Schaefer: Author deceased at the time of publication A.RP.anizzi ([gJ) Laboratóriode Entomologia, Embrapa Trigo, Caixa Postal 3081, Passo Fundo, RS9900l-970,Brazil e-mail:[email protected] eSpringerScience-Business Media Dordrecht 2015 537 :I.R.Panizzi,J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cletus Trigonus
    BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE TRUE BUGS (HETEROPTERA) OF DISTRICT SWAT PAKISTAN SANA ULLAH DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY HAZARA UNIVERSITY MANSEHRA 2018 HAZARA UNIVERSITY MANSEHRA DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE TRUE BUGS (HETEROPTERA) OF DISTRICT SWAT PAKISTAN By SANA ULLAH 34894 13-PhD-Zol-F-HU-1 This research study has been conducted and reported as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philisophy in Zoology awarded by Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan Mansehra, The Friday 22, February 2019 BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE TRUE BUGS (HETEROPTERA) OF DISTRICT SWAT PAKISTAN Submitted by Sana Ullah Ph.D Scholar Research Supervisor Prof. Dr. Habib Ahmad Department of Genetics Hazara University, Mansehra Co-Supervisor Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ather Rafi Principal Scientific Officer, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY HAZARA UNIVERSITY MANSEHRA 2018 Dedication Dedicated to my Parents and Siblings ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises are due to Almighty Allah, the most Powerful Who is the Lord of every creature of the universe and all the tributes to the Holy prophet Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) who had spread the light of learning in the world. I wish to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Habib Ahmad (TI), Vice Chancellor, Islamia College University, Peshawar, for his enormous support, inspiring guidance from time to time with utmost patience and providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work. He is a source of great motivation and encouragement for me. I respect him from the core of my heart due to his integrity, attitude towards students, and eagerness towards research. I am equally grateful to my Co Supervisor Prof.
    [Show full text]