DOCSLIB.ORG

Principles of Crustacean Taxonomy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Principles of Crustacean Taxonomy Crustacean Fisheries Division Manual on Taxonomy and Identification of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 20-24th August 2013 Convener Dr. Josileen Jose Co-Conveners Dr. S. Lakshmi Pillai Dr. Rekhadevi Chakraborthy 3 LIST OF FACULTY MEMBERS Dr. G. Maheswarudu Principal Scientist & Head Crustacean Fisheries Division Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682018 Email: [email protected] Mob: 9656405418 Dr. V.D. Deshmukh Principal Scientist & Scientist-in-charge Research Centre Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute 2nd Floor, C.I.F.E. Old Campus Fisheries University Road, Versova Mumbai-400 061 Email: [email protected] Mob: 09820692454 Dr. Josileen Jose Principal Scientist Crustacean Fisheries Division Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682018 Email: [email protected] Mob: 09447232966 Dr. A.P. Dineshbabu Principal Scientist & Scientist-in-charge Research Centre Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute PB. No. 244, Hoige Bazar Mangalore-575001 Email: [email protected] Mob: 09449825790 Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 4 Dr. S. Lakshmi Pillai Senior Scientist Crustacean Fisheries Division Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682018 Email: [email protected] Mob: 09446036673 Dr. Rekhadevi Chakraborthy Senior Scientist Crustacean Fisheries Division Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682018 Email: [email protected] Mob: 09447084867 Dr. E.V. Radhakrishnan Emeritus Scientist Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682018 Email: [email protected] Mob: 9447250634 Mr. Rahul G. Kumar Research Scholar National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources Kochi unit Ernakulam North P.O., Kochi-682018 Email: [email protected] Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 5 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Ms. Sandhya K.S., M.F.Sc. Fisheries Resource Management KUFOS, Panangad, Cochin, Kerala - 682 506. E-mail:[email protected] Mobile No.9048268104 Mr. Saneer N.S., SRF,KUFOS, Pananghad, Cochin, Kerala - 682 506. E-mail:[email protected] Mobile No.9048809226 Mr.Subal Kumar Roul CIFE, Room No.405, New Boys Hostel Off Yari Road, Versova, Andheri (W), Mumbai – 400 061. E-mail:[email protected] Mobile No. 09699417678 Ms.Shary Rajan HT Food Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.17/SDF Ground Floor CSEZ, Kakkanad, Kochi. E-mail:[email protected] Mobile No. 7736211436 Mr.Trivedi Jigneshkumar N., Marine Biodiversity and Ecology Lab, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, The M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat,India E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 09428138374 Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 6 Ms. Sumedha Arya, Marine Biodiversity and Ecology Lab, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, The M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 09722450009 Ms. Sangeetha K.R., Department of Aquaculture, Sacred Heart College, Thevara, Cochin E-mail:[email protected] Mobile No. 9645757821 Dr. A. Maharajan, PG & Research Department of Zoology, KhadirMohideen College, Adirampattinam -614701, Thanjavur Dist, Tamil Nadu. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 09443286900 Shri. Arshad Keethadath, Research Scholar PG Department of Zoology & research Centre SN College, Kannur - 670 007 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 09745945702 Mr.Devkate Ajinkya Dattatrya, M.F.Sc Fishery Hydrography, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Panangad ,P.O.Kochi, Kerala. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No.09405056810 Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 7 Dr.Bindu Bhaskaran, Department of Aquaculture, S.H. College, Thevara. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 9744036430 Ms.Apsara S. Krishnan, Dept. of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala, Thiruvanthapuram. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 9746608226 Dr. Balu S., Instructor (Fishing Technology), CIFNET, Fine Arts Avenue, Cochin-16. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 8129152293 Dr.Raju M. K. Associate Professor, Dept. of Zoology, S.H.College, Thevara, Cochin. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 9446140481 Helna A.K Research Scholar PG Department of Zoology & research Centre SN College, Kannur - 670 007 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 9496463811 Dr. Shiny K .J, Assistant Professor, Govt. college, Nattakom, Kottayam Email: [email protected] Mobile No: 9447886171 Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 8 Sibi T Baby, JRF, Centre for Marine Living Resources & Ecology, Field Research Station Agatti, Lakshadweep – 682 553. E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No. 9946917679 Dr. K. K. Prajith, Scientist, CIFT, Matsyapuri (P.O) Cochin- 29 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No:9447726227 Dr. P. S. Sivaprasad, Technical Assistant, C/O Asst. Director of Fisheries, Staff Training Centre, East Kadungallur, Aluva, Ernakulam (Dt). E-mail: [email protected] Mobile No .08891624339 Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 9 Contents 1. Glossary of terms used in taxonomy 11-14 2. Technical terms and measurements 15-18 3. Introduction to crustacean fisheries of India 19-27 G. Maheswarudu 4. Principals of crustacean taxonomy 28-39 V. D.Deshmukh 5. Types of types 40-44 Rahul G. Kumar 6. Penaeus 45-69 Josileen Jose 7. Trachypenaeus, Metapenaeopsis & Parapenaeus 70-75 V. D.Deshmukh 8. Metapenaeus & Metapenaeopsis 76-91 S. Lakshmi Pillai 9. Solenocera 92-106 A.P.Dineshbabu 10. Deep sea prawns 107-131 Rekha Devi Chakraborthy 11. Non-penaeids 132-136 V.D. Deshmukh Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 10 12. Lobsters 137-156 E.V.Radhakrishnan 13. Brachyuran crabs 157-169 Josileen Jose Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 11 Glossary of Terms Used in Taxonomy Plural form in parentheses ADROSTRAL CARINA: Ridge flanking the rostrum, sometimes nearly reaching the posterior margin of the carapace. ADROSTRAL SULCUS: Groove flanking the rostrum mesial to the adrostral carina , sometimes nearly reaching the posterior margin of the carapace. ANTENNA (ANTENNAE): .More lateral to the two paired , usually flagellate appendages projecting distally from the anterior end of the cephalothorax. ANTENNAL CARINA: Ridge extending posteriorly along dorsal extremity of antennal region , often continuous with antennal spine. ANTENNAL PEDUNCLE: Five basal segments of the antenna , from which the flagellum arises distally. ANTENNAL SPINE: Spine situated on the anterior margin of the carapace. ANTENNULAR FLAGELLUM (ANTENNAL FLAGELLA): Multiarticulate paired filaments (sometimes flattened lamellate) of the antennule. ANTENNULAR PEDUNCLE: Three basal segments of the antennule, from which the flagella arise distally. BASIAL SPINE: Spine projecting from basis of the thoracic appendage. BRANCHIA (BRANCHIAE): Respiratory organ (gill) associated with an appendage or with the body wall. BRANCHIAL REGION : Area of the carapace overlying the branchial cavity. BRANCHIOSTEGAL CARINA: Longitudinal ridge extending along anteroventral part of carapace, usually continuous with branchiostegal spine. BRANCHIOSTEGAL- HEPATIC CARINA: Longitudinal ridge consisting of the fusion of the branhiostegal and hepatic carinae. BRANCHIOSTEGAL SPINE: Short spine on or near anterior margin of the carapace ventral to the antennal spine and dorsal to the anteroventral angle of the carapace. BRANCHIOSTEGITE: Expanded ventro-lateral part of the carapace covering the gills. Taxonomy and Identication of Commercially Important Crustaceans of India 12 CARINA (CARINAE): A ridge or keel of the exoskeleton CARPUS (CARPI). Fifth podomere from the proximal end of a typically 7-segmented appendage. CHELA(CHELAE): Pincer formed by the two distal podomeres of a pereopod in which the movable finger (dactyl) opposes a fixed finger formed by a distal extension of the propod. CICATRIX (CICATRICES): Longitudinally disposed ridge(s) often present on lateral part of sixth abdominal somite. COXA (COXAE): First or proximal podomere of a typically 7-segmented appendage. COXAL SPINE: Spine projecting from the coxa of a thoracic appendage. DACTYL: Terminal podomere of a typically 7-segmented appendage.. DISTOLATERAL PROJECTION: Distolateral, ventrally inclined projection or spur of the basis of the endopod of the male second pleopod. DISTOMEDIAN PROJECTION: Distal relatively narrow extension of the dorsomedian lobule of the petasma. DISTOVENTRAL PROJECTION: Outer distal flap articulating with distal extremity of ventrolateral lobule of petasma in members of the genus Metapenaeopsis. DORSOLATERAL CARINA: Longitudinal ridge on dorsolateral region of carapace running dorsal to orbital region. ENDOPOD: Mesial ramus of biramous appendage, especially one arising from the basis or from the protopodite of the pleopod EPIGASTRIC TOOTH: Tooth on the carapace situated above the gastric region behind the first (posterior most) rostral tooth. EPIPOD: Lateral exite of the coxa of a thoracic appendage, sometimes branchial in function. EXOPOD: Lateral ramus of a biramous appendage, arising from the basis, or from the protopodite. GASTROFRONTAL CARINA: Short longitudinal ridge extending posteriorly from the ventral extremity of the orbital region. GASTROFRONTAL SULCUS: Short longitudinal depression accompanying the gastrofrontal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans
    RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2009 Supplement No. 21: 1–109 Date of Publication: 15 Sep.2009 © National University of Singapore A CLASSIFICATION OF LIVING AND FOSSIL GENERA OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEANS Sammy De Grave1, N. Dean Pentcheff 2, Shane T. Ahyong3, Tin-Yam Chan4, Keith A. Crandall5, Peter C. Dworschak6, Darryl L. Felder7, Rodney M. Feldmann8, Charles H. J. M. Fransen9, Laura Y. D. Goulding1, Rafael Lemaitre10, Martyn E. Y. Low11, Joel W. Martin2, Peter K. L. Ng11, Carrie E. Schweitzer12, S. H. Tan11, Dale Tshudy13, Regina Wetzer2 1Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PW, United Kingdom [email protected] [email protected] 2Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007 United States of America [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 3Marine Biodiversity and Biosecurity, NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Kilbirnie Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] 4Institute of Marine Biology, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan, Republic of China [email protected] 5Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602 United States of America [email protected] 6Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien, Austria [email protected] 7Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504 United States of America [email protected] 8Department of Geology, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242 United States of America [email protected] 9Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, P. O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands [email protected] 10Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20560 United States of America [email protected] 11Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 12Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOPAPUA Expedition Highlighting Deep-Sea Benthic Biodiversity of Papua New- Guinea
    Biopapua Expedition – Progress report MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE 57 rue Cuvier 75005 PARIS‐ France BIOPAPUA Expedition Highlighting deep-sea benthic Biodiversity of Papua New- Guinea Submitted by: Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN) Represented by (co‐PI): Dr Sarah Samadi (Researcher, IRD) Dr Philippe Bouchet (Professor, MNHN) Dr Laure Corbari (Research associate, MNHN) 1 Biopapua Expedition – Progress report Contents Foreword 3 1‐ Our understanding of deep‐sea biodiversity of PNG 4 2 ‐ Tropical Deep‐Sea Benthos program 5 3‐ Biopapua Expedition 7 4‐ Collection management 15 5‐ Preliminary results 17 6‐ Outreach and publications 23 7‐ Appendices 26 Appendix 1 27 NRI, note n°. 302/2010 on 26th march, 2010, acceptance of Biopapua reseach programme Appendix 2 28 Biopapua cruise Report, submitted by Ralph MANA (UPNG) A Report Submitted to School of Natural and Physical Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea Appendix 3 39 Chan, T.Y (2012) A new genus of deep‐sea solenocerid shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Penaeoidea) from the Papua New Guinea. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 32(3), 489‐495. Appendix 4 47 Pante E, Corbari L., Thubaut J., Chan TY, Mana R., Boisselier MC, Bouchet P., Samadi S. (In Press). Exploration of the deep‐sea fauna of Papua New Guinea. Oceanography Appendix 5 60 Richer de Forges B. & Corbari L. (2012) A new species of Oxypleurodon Miers, 1886 (Crustacea Brachyura, Majoidea) from the Bismark Sea, Papua New Guinea. Zootaxa. 3320: 56–60 Appendix 6 66 Taxonomic list: Specimens in MNHN and Taiwan collections 2 Biopapua Expedition – Progress report Foreword Biopapua cruise was a MNHN/IRD deep‐sea cruise in partnership with the School of Natural and Physical Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Species-Specific Edna-Based Test Systems For
    REPORT SNO 7544-2020 Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters © Henrik Carl, Natural History Museum, Denmark History © Henrik Carl, Natural NIVA Denmark Water Research REPORT Main Office NIVA Region South NIVA Region East NIVA Region West NIVA Denmark Gaustadalléen 21 Jon Lilletuns vei 3 Sandvikaveien 59 Thormøhlensgate 53 D Njalsgade 76, 4th floor NO-0349 Oslo, Norway NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway NO-2312 Ottestad, Norway NO-5006 Bergen Norway DK 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (45) 39 17 97 33 Internet: www.niva.no Title Serial number Date Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring 7544-2020 22 October 2020 of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters Author(s) Topic group Distribution Steen W. Knudsen and Jesper H. Andersen – NIVA Denmark Environmental monitor- Public Peter Rask Møller – Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen ing Geographical area Pages Denmark 54 Client(s) Client's reference Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Miljøstyrelsen) UCB and CEKAN Printed NIVA Project number 180280 Summary We report the development of seven eDNA-based species-specific test systems for monitoring of marine Decapoda in Danish marine waters. The seven species are 1) Callinectes sapidus (blå svømmekrabbe), 2) Eriocheir sinensis (kinesisk uldhånds- krabbe), 3) Hemigrapsus sanguineus (stribet klippekrabbe), 4) Hemigrapsus takanoi (pensel-klippekrabbe), 5) Homarus ameri- canus (amerikansk hummer), 6) Paralithodes camtschaticus (Kamchatka-krabbe) and 7) Rhithropanopeus harrisii (østameri- kansk brakvandskrabbe).
    [Show full text]
  • Farmed Shrimp Production Data & Analysis
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Shrimp Production Review • Professor James L. Anderson, Director, Institute for Sustainable Food Systems - University of Florida • Dr. Diego Valderrama, University of los Andes, Colombia • Dr. Darryl Jory, Editor Emeritus, Global Aquaculture Alliance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Other Middle East / N Africa Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2015 (FAO Data) India 2006 - 2012 CAGR: 4.8% Americas China 5000K +4.2% Southeast Asia +8.8% 4500K Source: FAO (2017). +3.2% Southeast Asia includes Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, 4000K Bangladesh, Malaysia, Philippines, Myanmar and 3500K Taiwan. M. rosenbergii is not included. 3000K MT 2500K 2000K 1500K 1000K 500K 0K 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Other Middle East / N Africa Shrimp Aquaculture Production by World Region: 2000-2019 India Americas (FAO and GOAL Data) China 2016-2019 Projected CAGR: Southeast Asia 2006-2012 CAGR: 3.6% 4.8% Sources: FAO (2017) for 5000K 2000-2009; GOAL (2011-2016) for 2010-2015; GOAL (2017) 4500K for 2016-2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade
    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade AUSTIN B. WILLIAMS Introduction tons to pounds to conform with US. tinents and islands, shoal platforms, and fishery statistics). This total includes certain seamounts (Fig. 1 and 2). More­ Lobsters are valued throughout the clawed lobsters, spiny and flat lobsters, over, the world distribution of these world as prime seafood items wherever and squat lobsters or langostinos (Tables animals can also be divided rougWy into they are caught, sold, or consumed. 1 and 2). temperate, subtropical, and tropical Basically, three kinds are marketed for Fisheries for these animals are de­ temperature zones. From such partition­ food, the clawed lobsters (superfamily cidedly concentrated in certain areas of ing, the following facts regarding lob­ Nephropoidea), the squat lobsters the world because of species distribu­ ster fisheries emerge. (family Galatheidae), and the spiny or tion, and this can be recognized by Clawed lobster fisheries (superfamily nonclawed lobsters (superfamily noting regional and species catches. The Nephropoidea) are concentrated in the Palinuroidea) . Food and Agriculture Organization of temperate North Atlantic region, al­ The US. market in clawed lobsters is the United Nations (FAO) has divided though there is minor fishing for them dominated by whole living American the world into 27 major fishing areas for in cooler waters at the edge of the con­ lobsters, Homarus americanus, caught the purpose of reporting fishery statis­ tinental platform in the Gul f of Mexico, off the northeastern United States and tics. Nineteen of these are marine fish­ Caribbean Sea (Roe, 1966), western southeastern Canada, but certain ing areas, but lobster distribution is South Atlantic along the coast of Brazil, smaller species of clawed lobsters from restricted to only 14 of them, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-01937 Hattab, T., Leprieur, F., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Gravel, D., Le Loc’H, F
    Ecography ECOG-01937 Hattab, T., Leprieur, F., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Gravel, D., Le Loc’h, F. and Albouy, C. 2016. Forecasting fine- scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.01937 Supplementary material Forecasting fine-scale changes in the food-web structure of coastal marine communities under climate change by Hattab et al. Appendix 1 List of coastal exploited marine species considered in this study Species Genus Order Family Class Trophic guild Auxis rochei rochei (Risso, 1810) Auxis Perciformes Scombridae Actinopterygii Top predators Balistes capriscus Gmelin, 1789 Balistes Tetraodontiformes Balistidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Boops boops (Linnaeus, 1758) Boops Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Basal species Carcharhinus plumbeus (Nardo, 1827) Carcharhinus Carcharhiniformes Carcharhinidae Elasmobranchii Top predators Dasyatis pastinaca (Linnaeus, 1758) Dasyatis Rajiformes Dasyatidae Elasmobranchii Top predators Dentex dentex (Linnaeus, 1758) Dentex Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Dentex maroccanus Valenciennes, 1830 Dentex Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous Diplodus annularis (Linnaeus, 1758) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Forage species Diplodus sargus sargus (Linnaeus, 1758) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Macro-carnivorous (Geoffroy Saint- Diplodus vulgaris Hilaire, 1817) Diplodus Perciformes Sparidae Actinopterygii Basal species Engraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) Engraulis
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Species 2010 the GENERAL STATUS of SPECIES in CANADA
    Wild Species 2010 THE GENERAL STATUS OF SPECIES IN CANADA Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council National General Status Working Group This report is a product from the collaboration of all provincial and territorial governments in Canada, and of the federal government. Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (CESCC). 2011. Wild Species 2010: The General Status of Species in Canada. National General Status Working Group: 302 pp. Available in French under title: Espèces sauvages 2010: La situation générale des espèces au Canada. ii Abstract Wild Species 2010 is the third report of the series after 2000 and 2005. The aim of the Wild Species series is to provide an overview on which species occur in Canada, in which provinces, territories or ocean regions they occur, and what is their status. Each species assessed in this report received a rank among the following categories: Extinct (0.2), Extirpated (0.1), At Risk (1), May Be At Risk (2), Sensitive (3), Secure (4), Undetermined (5), Not Assessed (6), Exotic (7) or Accidental (8). In the 2010 report, 11 950 species were assessed. Many taxonomic groups that were first assessed in the previous Wild Species reports were reassessed, such as vascular plants, freshwater mussels, odonates, butterflies, crayfishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals. Other taxonomic groups are assessed for the first time in the Wild Species 2010 report, namely lichens, mosses, spiders, predaceous diving beetles, ground beetles (including the reassessment of tiger beetles), lady beetles, bumblebees, black flies, horse flies, mosquitoes, and some selected macromoths. The overall results of this report show that the majority of Canada’s wild species are ranked Secure.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 November 2005
    University of Auckland Institute of Marine Science Publications List maintained by Richard Taylor. Last updated: 31 July 2019. This map shows the relative frequencies of words in the publication titles listed below (1966-Nov. 2017), with “New Zealand” removed (otherwise it dominates), and variants of stem words and taxonomic synonyms amalgamated (e.g., ecology/ecological, Chrysophrys/Pagrus). It was created using Jonathan Feinberg’s utility at www.wordle.net. In press Markic, A., Gaertner, J.-C., Gaertner-Mazouni, N., Koelmans, A.A. Plastic ingestion by marine fish in the wild. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. McArley, T.J., Hickey, A.J.R., Wallace, L., Kunzmann, A., Herbert, N.A. Intertidal triplefin fishes have a lower critical oxygen tension (Pcrit), higher maximal aerobic capacity, and higher tissue glycogen stores than their subtidal counterparts. Journal of Comparative Physiology B: Biochemical, Systemic, and Environmental Physiology. O'Rorke, R., Lavery, S.D., Wang, M., Gallego, R., Waite, A.M., Beckley, L.E., Thompson, P.A., Jeffs, A.G. Phyllosomata associated with large gelatinous zooplankton: hitching rides and stealing bites. ICES Journal of Marine Science. Sayre, R., Noble, S., Hamann, S., Smith, R., Wright, D., Breyer, S., Butler, K., Van Graafeiland, K., Frye, C., Karagulle, D., Hopkins, D., Stephens, D., Kelly, K., Basher, Z., Burton, D., Cress, J., Atkins, K., Van Sistine, D.P., Friesen, B., Allee, R., Allen, T., Aniello, P., Asaad, I., Costello, M.J., Goodin, K., Harris, P., Kavanaugh, M., Lillis, H., Manca, E., Muller-Karger, F., Nyberg, B., Parsons, R., Saarinen, J., Steiner, J., Reed, A. A new 30 meter resolution global shoreline vector and associated global islands database for the development of standardized ecological coastal units.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Penaeidae Shrimp Diversity and Exploitation in South
    quac d A ul n tu a r e s e J i o r u Rajakumaran and Vaseeharan, Fish Aquac J 2014, 5:3 e r h n s i a DOI: 10.4172/ 2150-3508.1000103 F l Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal ISSN: 2150-3508 Research Article Open Access Survey on Penaeidae Shrimp Diversity and Exploitation in South East Coast of India Perumal Rajakumaran and Baskralingam Vaseeharan* Department of Animal Health and Management, Alagappa University, Karaikudi 630003, Tamil Nadu, India *Corresponding author: Baskralingam Vaseeharan, Crustacean Molecular Biology & Genomics lab, Department of Animal Health and Management, Alagappa University, Karaikudi 630003, Tamil Nadu, India, Tel: +91-4565-225682; Fax: +91-4565-225202; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: February 25, 2014; Accepted date: August 28, 2014; Published date: September 05, 2014 Copyright: © 2014 Rajakumaran P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract The assessment of Penaeidae species diversity in a particular region is very important in formulating conservation strategies. In the present study, the survey on diversity of Penaeidae species in south east coast of India has been assessed on the basis of landing of variety of species in this group. Penaeidae species were collected from various main landing centers of south east coast of India for three years. Identification and nomenclature was done based on previously published literature. Among the 59 species observed, the Penaeus semisulcatus, Penaeus monodon and Fenneropenaeus indicus were found mostly in all landing centers.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Xiphopenaeus Kroyeri Heller, 1862 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) in the Southeastern Mediterranean, Egypt
    BioInvasions Records (2019) Volume 8, Issue 2: 392–399 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article First record of Xiphopenaeus kroyeri Heller, 1862 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) in the Southeastern Mediterranean, Egypt Amal Ragae Khafage* and Somaya Mahfouz Taha National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, 101 Kasr Al-Ainy St., Cairo, Egypt *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Khafage AR, Taha SM (2019) First record of Xiphopenaeus kroyeri Abstract Heller, 1862 (Decapoda, Penaeidae) in the Southeastern Mediterranean, Egypt. Four hundred and forty seven specimens of a non-indigenous shrimp species were BioInvasions Records 8(2): 392–399, caught by local fishermen between the years 2016–2019, from Ma’deya shores, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.2.20 Abu Qir Bay, Alexandria, Egypt. These specimens were the Western Atlantic Received: 31 January 2018 Xiphopenaeus kroyeri Heller, 1862, making this the first record for the introduction Accepted: 27 February 2019 and establishment of a Western Atlantic shrimp species in Egyptian waters. Its Published: 18 April 2019 route of introduction is hypothesized to be through ballast water from ship tanks. Due to the high population densities it achieves in this non-native location, it is Handling editor: Kęstutis Arbačiauskas now considered a component of the Egyptian shrimp commercial catch. Thematic editor: Amy Fowler Copyright: © Khafage and Taha Key words: shrimp, seabob, Levantine Basin This is an open access article distributed under terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
    [Show full text]
  • Prawn Fauna (Crustacea: Decapoda) of India - an Annotated Checklist of the Penaeoid, Sergestoid, Stenopodid and Caridean Prawns
    Available online at: www.mbai.org.in doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2012.54.1.01697-08 Prawn fauna (Crustacea: Decapoda) of India - An annotated checklist of the Penaeoid, Sergestoid, Stenopodid and Caridean prawns E. V. Radhakrishnan*1, V. D. Deshmukh2, G. Maheswarudu3, Jose Josileen 1, A. P. Dineshbabu4, K. K. Philipose5, P. T. Sarada6, S. Lakshmi Pillai1, K. N. Saleela7, Rekhadevi Chakraborty1, Gyanaranjan Dash8, C.K. Sajeev1, P. Thirumilu9, B. Sridhara4, Y Muniyappa4, A.D.Sawant2, Narayan G Vaidya5, R. Dias Johny2, J. B. Verma3, P.K.Baby1, C. Unnikrishnan7, 10 11 11 1 7 N. P. Ramachandran , A. Vairamani , A. Palanichamy , M. Radhakrishnan and B. Raju 1CMFRI HQ, Cochin, 2Mumbai RC of CMFRI, 3Visakhapatnam RC of CMFRI, 4Mangalore RC of CMFRI, 5Karwar RC of CMFRI, 6Tuticorin RC of CMFRI, 7Vizhinjam RC of CMFRI, 8Veraval RC of CMFRI, 9Madras RC of CMFRI, 10Calicut RC of CMFRI, 11Mandapam RC of CMFRI *Correspondence e-mail: [email protected] Received: 07 Sep 2011, Accepted: 15 Mar 2012, Published: 30 Apr 2012 Original Article Abstract Many penaeoid prawns are of considerable value for the fishing Introduction industry and aquaculture operations. The annual estimated average landing of prawns from the fishery in India was 3.98 The prawn fauna inhabiting the marine, estuarine and lakh tonnes (2008-10) of which 60% were contributed by freshwater ecosystems of India are diverse and fairly well penaeid prawns. An additional 1.5 lakh tonnes is produced from known. Significant contributions to systematics of marine aquaculture. During 2010-11, India exported US $ 2.8 billion worth marine products, of which shrimp contributed 3.09% in prawns of Indian region were that of Milne Edwards (1837), volume and 69.5% in value of the total export.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Feed on the Growth and Survival of Long Eyed Swimming
    Soundarapandian et al., 2:3 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/scientificreports681 Open Access Open Access Scientific Reports Scientific Reports Research Article OpenOpen Access Access Effect of Feed on the Growth and Survival of Long Eyed Swimming Crab Podophthalmus vigil Fabricius (Crustacea: Decapoda) Soundarapandian P1*, Ravichandran S2 and Varadharajan D1 1Faculty of Marine Sciences, Centre of Advanced Study in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India 2Department of Zoology, Government Arts College, Kumbakonam, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract Food is considered to be the most potent factor affecting growth. Attempts to develop diets for culture of crabs have resulted in a variety of feeds. The absence of suitable feed either pellet or live food which can promote growth and survival is considered to be the most important lacuna in cultivation of crabs. So searching of economically viable feed to optimize the growth and survival in crabs are very much essential. In the present study the weight gain was higher in the crabs offered with Acetes sp. (86 g) followed by clam meat fed animals (47 g). The crabs fed with minimum amount of Acetes sp. (152 g) and maximum of clam meat (182 g). The FCR value was better in Acetes sp. (1.8) fed animal rather than clam meat fed animals (3.8). The survival rate was higher in Acetes sp. fed animals (92%) and lowest survival (72%) was observed in animals fed with clam meat. The survival was reasonable for both the feeds. But higher survival rate was reported in the animals fed with Acetes sp. than that of clam meat.
    [Show full text]