29 November 2005
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Metanephrops Challengeri)
Population genetics of New Zealand Scampi (Metanephrops challengeri) Alexander Verry A thesis submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology and Biodiversity. Victoria University of Wellington 2017 Page | I Abstract A fundamental goal of fisheries management is sustainable harvesting and the preservation of properly functioning populations. Therefore, an important aspect of management is the identification of demographically independent populations (stocks), which is achieved by estimating the movement of individuals between areas. A range of methods have been developed to determine the level of connectivity among populations; some measure this directly (e.g. mark- recapture) while others use indirect measures (e.g. population genetics). Each species presents a different set of challenges for methods that estimate levels of connectivity. Metanephrops challengeri is a species of nephropid lobster that supports a commercial fishery and inhabits the continental shelf and slope of New Zealand. Very little research on population structure has been reported for this species and it presents a unique set of challenges compared to finfish species. M. challengeri have a short pelagic larval duration lasting up to five days which limits the dispersal potential of larvae, potentially leading to low levels of connectivity among populations. The aim of this study was to examine the genetic population structure of the New Zealand M. challengeri fishery. DNA was extracted from M. challengeri samples collected from the eastern coast of the North Island (from the Bay of Plenty to the Wairarapa), the Chatham Rise, and near the Auckland Islands. DNA from the mitochondrial CO1 gene and nuclear ITS-1 region was amplified and sequenced. -
Development of Species-Specific Edna-Based Test Systems For
REPORT SNO 7544-2020 Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters © Henrik Carl, Natural History Museum, Denmark History © Henrik Carl, Natural NIVA Denmark Water Research REPORT Main Office NIVA Region South NIVA Region East NIVA Region West NIVA Denmark Gaustadalléen 21 Jon Lilletuns vei 3 Sandvikaveien 59 Thormøhlensgate 53 D Njalsgade 76, 4th floor NO-0349 Oslo, Norway NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway NO-2312 Ottestad, Norway NO-5006 Bergen Norway DK 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (47) 22 18 51 00 Phone (45) 39 17 97 33 Internet: www.niva.no Title Serial number Date Development of species-specific eDNA-based test systems for monitoring 7544-2020 22 October 2020 of non-indigenous Decapoda in Danish marine waters Author(s) Topic group Distribution Steen W. Knudsen and Jesper H. Andersen – NIVA Denmark Environmental monitor- Public Peter Rask Møller – Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen ing Geographical area Pages Denmark 54 Client(s) Client's reference Danish Environmental Protection Agency (Miljøstyrelsen) UCB and CEKAN Printed NIVA Project number 180280 Summary We report the development of seven eDNA-based species-specific test systems for monitoring of marine Decapoda in Danish marine waters. The seven species are 1) Callinectes sapidus (blå svømmekrabbe), 2) Eriocheir sinensis (kinesisk uldhånds- krabbe), 3) Hemigrapsus sanguineus (stribet klippekrabbe), 4) Hemigrapsus takanoi (pensel-klippekrabbe), 5) Homarus ameri- canus (amerikansk hummer), 6) Paralithodes camtschaticus (Kamchatka-krabbe) and 7) Rhithropanopeus harrisii (østameri- kansk brakvandskrabbe). -
Establishment of a Taxonomic and Molecular Reference Collection to Support the Identification of Species Regulated by the Wester
Management of Biological Invasions (2017) Volume 8, Issue 2: 215–225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2017.8.2.09 Open Access © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Marine Bioinvasions (19–21 January 2016, Sydney, Australia) Research Article Establishment of a taxonomic and molecular reference collection to support the identification of species regulated by the Western Australian Prevention List for Introduced Marine Pests P. Joana Dias1,2,*, Seema Fotedar1, Julieta Munoz1, Matthew J. Hewitt1, Sherralee Lukehurst2, Mathew Hourston1, Claire Wellington1, Roger Duggan1, Samantha Bridgwood1, Marion Massam1, Victoria Aitken1, Paul de Lestang3, Simon McKirdy3,4, Richard Willan5, Lisa Kirkendale6, Jennifer Giannetta7, Maria Corsini-Foka8, Steve Pothoven9, Fiona Gower10, Frédérique Viard11, Christian Buschbaum12, Giuseppe Scarcella13, Pierluigi Strafella13, Melanie J. Bishop14, Timothy Sullivan15, Isabella Buttino16, Hawis Madduppa17, Mareike Huhn17, Chela J. Zabin18, Karolina Bacela-Spychalska19, Dagmara Wójcik-Fudalewska20, Alexandra Markert21,22, Alexey Maximov23, Lena Kautsky24, Cornelia Jaspers25, Jonne Kotta26, Merli Pärnoja26, Daniel Robledo27, Konstantinos Tsiamis28,29, Frithjof C. Küpper30, Ante Žuljević31, Justin I. McDonald1 and Michael Snow1 1Department of Fisheries, Government of Western Australia, PO Box 20 North Beach 6920, Western Australia; 2School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Western Australia; 3Chevron -
New Zealand Fishes a Field Guide to Common Species Caught by Bottom, Midwater, and Surface Fishing Cover Photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola Lalandi), Malcolm Francis
New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing Cover photos: Top – Kingfish (Seriola lalandi), Malcolm Francis. Top left – Snapper (Chrysophrys auratus), Malcolm Francis. Centre – Catch of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae), Neil Bagley (NIWA). Bottom left – Jack mackerel (Trachurus sp.), Malcolm Francis. Bottom – Orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), NIWA. New Zealand fishes A field guide to common species caught by bottom, midwater, and surface fishing New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No: 208 Prepared for Fisheries New Zealand by P. J. McMillan M. P. Francis G. D. James L. J. Paul P. Marriott E. J. Mackay B. A. Wood D. W. Stevens L. H. Griggs S. J. Baird C. D. Roberts‡ A. L. Stewart‡ C. D. Struthers‡ J. E. Robbins NIWA, Private Bag 14901, Wellington 6241 ‡ Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, 6011Wellington ISSN 1176-9440 (print) ISSN 1179-6480 (online) ISBN 978-1-98-859425-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-98-859426-2 (online) 2019 Disclaimer While every effort was made to ensure the information in this publication is accurate, Fisheries New Zealand does not accept any responsibility or liability for error of fact, omission, interpretation or opinion that may be present, nor for the consequences of any decisions based on this information. Requests for further copies should be directed to: Publications Logistics Officer Ministry for Primary Industries PO Box 2526 WELLINGTON 6140 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0800 00 83 33 Facsimile: 04-894 0300 This publication is also available on the Ministry for Primary Industries website at http://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/publications/ A higher resolution (larger) PDF of this guide is also available by application to: [email protected] Citation: McMillan, P.J.; Francis, M.P.; James, G.D.; Paul, L.J.; Marriott, P.; Mackay, E.; Wood, B.A.; Stevens, D.W.; Griggs, L.H.; Baird, S.J.; Roberts, C.D.; Stewart, A.L.; Struthers, C.D.; Robbins, J.E. -
1 Invasive Species in the Northeastern and Southwestern Atlantic
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published version of this work (the version of record) is published by Elsevier in Marine Pollution Bulletin. Corrected proofs were made available online on the 24 January 2017 at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.048. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. Invasive species in the Northeastern and Southwestern Atlantic Ocean: a review Maria Cecilia T. de Castroa,b, Timothy W. Filemanc and Jason M Hall-Spencerd,e a School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth & Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. [email protected]. +44(0)1752 633 100. b Directorate of Ports and Coasts, Navy of Brazil. Rua Te filo Otoni, 4 - Centro, 20090-070. Rio de Janeiro / RJ, Brazil. c PML Applications Ltd, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK. d Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, Plymouth University, PL4 8AA, UK. e Shimoda Marine Research Centre, University of Tsukuba, Japan. Abstract The spread of non-native species has been a subject of increasing concern since the 1980s when human- as a major vector for species transportation and spread, although records of non-native species go back as far as 16th Century. Ever increasing world trade and the resulting rise in shipping have highlighted the issue, demanding a response from the international community to the threat of non-native marine species. In the present study, we searched for available literature and databases on shipping and invasive species in the North-eastern (NE) and South-western (SW) Atlantic Ocean and assess the risk represented by the shipping trade between these two regions. -
Assessment of Ecological Effects of the Reclamation and Extension to Wellington Airport
Assessment of Ecological Effects of the reclamation and extension to Wellington Airport Mark James1, Alison MacDiarmid2, Jenny Beaumont2, David Thompson2 Prepared for Wellington International Airport Limited July 2015 1 Aquatic Environmental Sciences Ltd 2 NIWA Wellington [email protected] P O Box 328 Whangamata 3643 021 0538379 AES - Assessment of Ecological Effects Wellington Airport 2015 1 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Scope of This Report ............................................................................................................... 4 2. The Physical Environment ............................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Lyall Bay .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Soft sediments ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Hydrodynamics ....................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Contaminants .......................................................................................................................... 5 -
Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 .................................. -
Responses of Aquatic Non-Native Species to Novel Predator Cues and Increased Mortality
Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses Spring 5-17-2017 Responses of Aquatic Non-Native Species to Novel Predator Cues and Increased Mortality Brian Christopher Turner Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Turner, Brian Christopher, "Responses of Aquatic Non-Native Species to Novel Predator Cues and Increased Mortality" (2017). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3620. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5512 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Responses of Aquatic Non-Native Species to Novel Predator Cues and Increased Mortality by Brian Christopher Turner A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Sciences and Resources Dissertation Committee: Catherine E. de Rivera, Chair Edwin D. Grosholz Michael T. Murphy Greg M. Ruiz Ian R. Waite Portland State University 2017 Abstract Lethal biotic interactions strongly influence the potential for aquatic non-native species to establish and endure in habitats to which they are introduced. Predators in the recipient area, including native and previously established non-native predators, can prevent establishment, limit habitat use, and reduce abundance of non-native species. Management efforts by humans using methods designed to cause mass mortality (e.g., trapping, biocide applications) can reduce or eradicate non-native populations. -
Assessment of Ecological Effects on the Receiving Environment from the Discharge of Treated Wastewater from an Army Bay WWTP
Assessment of Ecological Effects on the receiving environment from the discharge of treated wastewater from an Army Bay WWTP (Photo Shane Kelly) Mark James1, Mike Stewart2, Chris Dada2, Shane Kelly3 and Sara Jamieson4 Prepared for Watercare Services Ltd November 2018 1Mark James 2 Streamlined Environmental Ltd Aquatic Environmental Sciences Ltd 3 Coast and Catchment Ltd PO Box 328 4 Tracks Ltd Whangamata 3643 Email: [email protected] Cell: 021 0538379 1 Executive Summary Watercare is preparing an Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE) for new consents for the continued operation of a wastewater treatment plant and discharge to service growth in the Hibiscus Coast/ Orewa/Whangaparaoa area. The consent application process requires an assessment of the potential effects on the receiving environments and ecological values. The report summarises the status of the existing environment in the Whangaparaoa Passage and wider environment based on existing and new information collected as part of the consent application process. The report then provides an assessment of the potential effects of the existing and then the future discharges on the ecological values if a discharge to the existing discharge point (~1.3 km into the Whangaparaoa Passage in 25 m of water) is the final option. Future scenarios considered for modelling were a small increase in population in the “Short- term” through to ~2031 (to 116,000 PE), an increase in population serviced from a combined WWTP to 160,000 PE in the “Medium-term” (~2041) and up to 192,000 PE in the “Long-term” (~2053). Note that slightly lower populations are now being used for each scenario in the final AEE based on updated growth numbers provided and thus the risk assessment is conservative. -
Developing a List of Invasive Alien Species Likely to Threaten Biodiversity and Ecosystems in the European Union
Received: 25 July 2018 | Accepted: 7 November 2018 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14527 PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE Developing a list of invasive alien species likely to threaten biodiversity and ecosystems in the European Union Helen E. Roy1 | Sven Bacher2 | Franz Essl3,4 | Tim Adriaens5 | David C. Aldridge6 | John D. D. Bishop7 | Tim M. Blackburn8,9 | Etienne Branquart10 | Juliet Brodie11 | Carles Carboneras12 | Elizabeth J. Cottier-Cook13 | Gordon H. Copp14,15 | Hannah J. Dean1 | Jørgen Eilenberg16 | Belinda Gallardo17 | Mariana Garcia18 | Emili García‐Berthou19 | Piero Genovesi20 | Philip E. Hulme21 | Marc Kenis22 | Francis Kerckhof23 | Marianne Kettunen24 | Dan Minchin25 | Wolfgang Nentwig26 | Ana Nieto18 | Jan Pergl27 | Oliver L. Pescott1 | Jodey M. Peyton1 | Cristina Preda28 | Alain Roques29 | Steph L. Rorke1 | Riccardo Scalera18 | Stefan Schindler3 | Karsten Schönrogge1 | Jack Sewell7 | Wojciech Solarz30 | Alan J. A. Stewart31 | Elena Tricarico32 | Sonia Vanderhoeven33 | Gerard van der Velde34,35,36 | Montserrat Vilà37 | Christine A. Wood7 | Argyro Zenetos38 | Wolfgang Rabitsch3 1Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK 2University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland 3Environment Agency Austria, Vienna, Austria 4Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology, University Vienna, Vienna, Austria 5Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Brussels, Belgium 6Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 7The Laboratory, The Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, UK 8University College London, -
An Accuracy Assessment of Ultrasonic Transmitter Locations Determined by Mobile Telemetry in Aquatic Systems
Fisheries Management and Ecology Fisheries Management and Ecology, 2014 Management and Ecological Note An accuracy assessment of ultrasonic transmitter locations determined by mobile telemetry in aquatic systems D.A.JAMES,J.L.FISCHER,J.D.LAUBE&M.E.SPINDLER U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Plains Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Pierre, SD, USA Underwater telemetry is a common and effective method This study was conducted at two sites, Hipple Lake and to evaluate gear efficiency and the behaviour, physiology the upstream, riverine section of Lake Sharpe approxi- and mortality of free-ranging fish (Winter 1996; Lucas mately 13 km downstream from Oahe Dam, both within & Baras 2001; Wanner et al. 2007; Guy et al. 2009; the Missouri River, South Dakota, USA. Hipple Lake is a Cooke et al. 2013; Friedl et al. 2013). A telemetry sys- 178 ha backwater of upper Lake Sharpe near Pierre, South tem basically consists of a transmitter that emits radio Dakota. Average depth in Hipple Lake was about 2.0 m (27–300 MHz) or ultrasonic signals (27–300 kHz), an (D. A. James, personal observation). Lake Sharpe is a antenna or hydrophone that detects the signal (passively 128-km long, flow-through reservoir that extends from or actively) and a receiver that decodes signals into audi- Oahe Dam near Pierre, South Dakota, downstream to Big ble sounds (Winter 1996). Each type of telemetry system Bend Dam near Chamberlain, South Dakota. The com- has a set of advantages and disadvantages (Cooke et al. bined riverine and lacustrine areas of Lake Sharpe have a 2013). -
[I]Metanephrops Challengeri[I]
A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 20 September 2018. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/5641), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. van der Reis AL, Laroche O, Jeffs AG, Lavery SD. 2018. Preliminary analysis of New Zealand scampi (Metanephrops challengeri) diet using metabarcoding. PeerJ 6:e5641 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5641 Preliminary analysis of New Zealand scampi (Metanephrops challengeri) diet using metabarcoding Aimee L van der Reis Corresp., 1 , Olivier Laroche 2 , Andrew G Jeffs 1, 2 , Shane D Lavery 1, 2 1 Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2 School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Corresponding Author: Aimee L van der Reis Email address: [email protected] Deep sea lobsters are highly valued for seafood and provide the basis of important commercial fisheries in many parts of the world. Despite their economic significance, relatively little is known about their natural diets. Microscopic analyses of foregut content in some species have suffered from low taxonomic resolution, with many of the dietary items difficult to reliably identify as their tissue is easily digested. DNA metabarcoding has the potential to provide greater taxonomic resolution of the diet of the New Zealand scampi (Metanephrops challengeri) through the identification of gut contents, but a number of methodological concerns need to be overcome first to ensure optimum DNA metabarcoding results. In this study, a range of methodological parameters were tested to determine the optimum protocols for DNA metabarcoding, and provide a first view of M.