Assessment of Ecological Effects on the Receiving Environment from the Discharge of Treated Wastewater from an Army Bay WWTP
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Assessment of Ecological Effects on the receiving environment from the discharge of treated wastewater from an Army Bay WWTP (Photo Shane Kelly) Mark James1, Mike Stewart2, Chris Dada2, Shane Kelly3 and Sara Jamieson4 Prepared for Watercare Services Ltd November 2018 1Mark James 2 Streamlined Environmental Ltd Aquatic Environmental Sciences Ltd 3 Coast and Catchment Ltd PO Box 328 4 Tracks Ltd Whangamata 3643 Email: [email protected] Cell: 021 0538379 1 Executive Summary Watercare is preparing an Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE) for new consents for the continued operation of a wastewater treatment plant and discharge to service growth in the Hibiscus Coast/ Orewa/Whangaparaoa area. The consent application process requires an assessment of the potential effects on the receiving environments and ecological values. The report summarises the status of the existing environment in the Whangaparaoa Passage and wider environment based on existing and new information collected as part of the consent application process. The report then provides an assessment of the potential effects of the existing and then the future discharges on the ecological values if a discharge to the existing discharge point (~1.3 km into the Whangaparaoa Passage in 25 m of water) is the final option. Future scenarios considered for modelling were a small increase in population in the “Short- term” through to ~2031 (to 116,000 PE), an increase in population serviced from a combined WWTP to 160,000 PE in the “Medium-term” (~2041) and up to 192,000 PE in the “Long-term” (~2053). Note that slightly lower populations are now being used for each scenario in the final AEE based on updated growth numbers provided and thus the risk assessment is conservative. A number of treatment options were also considered along with timeframes for the infrastructure development of the existing WWTP was at Army Bay and the discharge into the Whangaparaoa Passage. The existing environment off the Whangaparaoa Peninsula can be summarised as: A coastal region that is dynamic and well flushed, supports a diverse and productive intertidal and subtidal ecosystem and is valued for its recreational and cultural values, including kai moana. The region is valued for its terrestrial landforms of cliffs and shore platforms and ecologically for its diversity of biota along the shoreline, inter-tidal and sub-tidal habitats and as feeding grounds for a range of fish and bird species; Water quality in the current discharge has met the consent conditions over the last 5 years (the period assessed) and between 2012 and 2018 levels of nutrients, biological oxygen demand (BOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) have been decreasing. A UV treatment system was installed in 2006 and has significantly improved the microbial quality of the discharge; The Whangaparaoa Passage, location of the current discharge point, has relatively high currents with strongest flows around the headlands and tend to be strongest on the ebb tide. Flows are to the north-east into the Hauraki Gulf on the ebb tide and to the south-west on a flood tide; 2 Water quality in the Whangaparaoa Passage and nearby sites is high quality and considered to be “excellent” according to the Auckland Council classification. There is no indication that the existing discharge is impacting on water or microbial quality; Monitoring of microbial indicators in the water and shellfish in the vicinity of the outfall show no effects of the present discharge and are below MFE guidelines for shellfish gathering with at least 92% of the shellfish samples meeting the FSANZ (Australia and New Zealand Food Standards) guideline. Occasionally microbial levels increase during rainfall events but this has not been attributed to the discharge; There is a relatively diverse benthic community throughout the Whangaparaoa Passage and area around the outer Whangaparaoa Peninsula, diversity and habitat complexity was lower towards the north but increased towards the coastline of the Whangaparaoa Peninsula and Tiritiri Matangi Island. Horse mussels and sponges are abundant and widespread around the margins, scallops are patchily distributed with diverse communities of polychaete worms and crustaceans throughout. The area has high infaunal values but they tend to be lower towards the north where the substrate is muddier and has less shell hash; Total organic carbon levels were surprisingly high in places but are within levels recorded at other high diversity sites nearby. A microalgae mat well to the north-west of the outfall was found in an earlier survey in the later part of 2017 but was not present when the area was resurveyed in April 2018 and is unlikely to be attributed to the present discharge form the Army Bay WWTP because of the distance from the discharge point; Overall there is no evidence of effects on water quality or the benthic community from the present WWTP discharge; The diverse invertebrate biota is reflected in a relatively high valued fisheries and juvenile habitat in the region. The main fish caught is snapper and kahawai. There is likely to be limited fishing in close to shore because of the NZ Defence Force activities in the area. Tiritiri Matangi is highly regarded for its cultural values; Following creation of a sanctuary and predator control the area around the headland of the Peninsula bird numbers have increased and the area supports at least 14 threatened species; and A number of mammals are observed in the area including common dolphin and Bryde’s whales and other whale species that are in transit through the area at times. 3 Effects of future increases to service an increasing population from an Army Bay WWTP The effects of future growth on a discharge into the Whangaparaoa Passage are as follows: Modelling has shown that even when reaching the full population growth predicted for 2053 there will be negligible and undetectable change in the salinity of the receiving waters; A staged approach to upgrading the plant has been proposed based on the following concept. Following the Stage 1 upgrade 40% of the plant design capacity will be provided using MBR technology which will result in a slight reduction in the discharged concentration for total nitrogen (TN) and TSS. The Stage 2 upgrade will increase the proportion of flow treated using the MBR technology, providing a further reduction in the TSS and further upgrades are proposed which will result in the discharged TN concentration being reduced to 10 mg N/L. Following the Stage 3 upgrade, the full plant will have been converted to MBR technology (or appropriate alternative providing the same effluent quality). With the proposed staged improved treatment, the annual median discharge for TN (nitrogen is the most important nutrient controlling phytoplankton growth in these environments) is predicted to reduce from the existing 14 mg/L to 12 mg/L and eventually to 10 mg/L over the three proposed upgrade steps and the concentrations for TSS will also improve. The staged reduction reflects continued operation of the existing WWTP alongside new technologies as population growth increases. Because of the relatively strong currents which will result in rapid dilution (>500x within 100 m of the outfall for over 90% of the time), the water quality of the receiving environment, even when fully developed and with increased nitrogen loads, will not change, will continue to be “excellent” and will not increase the risk of algal blooms; Even with the minimum dilution factor (70x) at the outfall, levels of metals and emerging contaminants will be reduced to below guidelines and levels known to be of concern; A quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) has been carried out for enterovirus, adenovirus, and norovirus and shows: o Microbial levels will increase with increasing population and will be higher during winter; o Microbial levels are greatest closest to the discharge point, will rapidly reduce away from the discharge point and decrease significantly by the time the water moves towards Huroa Point and Whangaparaoa Head. Most of the dispersal is likely to be the north-east or south-west; 4 o For recreational use, modeling has shown the microbial levels would be low and always below a “no observable effects level” of 1% for a 100-fold (2 log) removal efficacy and very low for a 3 log or 1,000x reduction at the WWTP for the three viruses assessed at all sites; o For shellfish gathering microbial levels would be below the “no observable effects level” threshold of 3% for a 100-fold reduction and low and always below thresholds for a 3 log reduction or 1,000x at all sites. Four log reduction would reduce the risk to practically zero; and o It is recommended that at least 1,000-fold (i.e. 3 Log) reduction in viral concentrations at the Army Bay WWTP, prior to discharge, should be sufficient even during the worst-case maximum discharge scenario (192,000 PE), to reduce health risks to an acceptable level for contact recreation and consumption of raw shellfish harvested at all the selected sites in the receiving environment. There is no evidence that benthic aquatic habitats and communities are adversely affected at present and any effects of the future discharge would only be in the immediate vicinity of the discharge pipe, if they did occur, and would be within the bounds of the natural variability in the area; and Birds and fish in the coastal environment are highly mobile and would not be adversely affected. The overall conclusion is that because of the rapid dilution and dispersion at this site combined with an improved level of treatment there will not be any detectable or ecologically significant change in the receiving environment including trophic state, risk of algal blooms, and there would be no effects on fish resources, mammals or birds.