MIR OVERVIEW the Russian Space Station Mir, Which Has Become An

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MIR OVERVIEW the Russian Space Station Mir, Which Has Become An MIR OVERVIEW The Russian space station Mir, which has become an important part of the U.S.-led effort to build the International Space Station, is itself the latest stage in the evolution of Russia’s manned space program. Since 1971, Russia has been pushing back the limits on human presence in space, first with the Salyut series of space stations and now Mir. The current station is the result of numerous improvements the Russians made in the design of the Salyut spacecraft, but it re- tains the basic modular approach—the joining of various space vehicles to form a station—that has been the hallmark of the Rus- sian manned space program. Mir is a third-generation space station. Its design is based on the modules of the second Salyut station. Mir (Russian for “peace,” “commune,” and “world”) is actually a complex of various mod- ules: the core module, Kvant-1, Kvant-2, Kristall, Spektr, and Priroda. 27 MIR MODULES The core module was the first element of the Mir complex to be placed in orbit. It was launched on a Proton rocket in February 1986, several months before the last Salyut station was removed from ser- vice. The orbiting station has been manned almost continuously since then. Atlantis approaches Mir during STS-74 mission (November 1995) The core module is the control center for the entire space sta- tion and also contains work and living areas. Two concentric cylinders, 43 feet long, make up this major habitable volume. The working area houses not only the control center but also a pilot’s the spacecraft that transport crew members and supplies to the sta- station and medical monitoring equipment. The living area has indi- tion and back to Earth. The docking module has a transfer vidual crew cabins, a galley, and a personal hygiene compartment compartment that allows the crew to travel between the Mir mod- complete with toilet, sink, and shower. ules and unload incoming supplies and equipment. A docking module attached to the forward end of the core mod- Two Kvant (pronounced kwahnt) spacecraft serve as Mir re- ule has four radial ports for additional modules and an axial port for search modules. (Kvant means “quantum” in Russian.) Mir Core Module Length 43.3 ft Maximum Diameter 13.7 ft Habitable Volume 3,000 ft3 Priroda Weight at Launch 45,444 lb Launch Weight 43,431 lb Launch Vehicle Proton (Three-Stage) Length 43 ft Orbital Inclination 51.6 deg Diameter 14.35 ft Number of Solar Arrays 2 (Third Added During EVA) Habitable Volume 2,337 ft3 Span Across Solar Arrays 98 ft Anticipated Lifetime Area of Solar Arrays 844 ft2 (1,088 ft2 With Third Array) at Launch 3 yr Electricity Available 9-10 kW at 28.6 V Resupply Carriers Progress, Progress M Number of Docking/Berthing Ports 2 Docking, 4 Berthing Number of Main Engines 2 Main Engine Thrust (Each) 666 lb Kvant-1 Total Launch Weight 45,777 lb Spektr Mir Module Weight 24,444 lb Launch Weight 43,299 lb Functional Service Module Weight 21,333 lb Length 43 ft Length 19.14 ft Diameter 14.35 ft Maximum Diameter 13.7 ft Habitable Volume 2,186 ft3 28 Habitable Volume 1,333 ft3 Anticipated Lifetime at Launch 5 yr Kvant-2 Launch Weight 43,477 lb Kristall Length 56.3 ft Launch Weight 4,362 lb Diameter 14.35 ft Length 56.3 ft Habitable Volume 2,043 ft3 Diameter 14.35 ft Span Across Solar Arrays 792 ft Habitable Volume 2,147 ft3 Solar Array Capacity ~7 kW Span Across Solar Arrays 118 ft Anticipated Lifetime at Launch 3 yr Mir Space Station MTD 950109-5097 Mir Space Station Kvant-1 is equipped with six gyrodynes, which provide ex- tremely accurate pointing of the space station and significantly reduce the amount of fuel used for attitude control. In 1992, Russian space- walking cosmonauts placed a thruster on top of a 48-foot-tall girder they erected and attached to Kvant-1 in 1991 to improve Mir’s atti- tude control. For performing astronomical observations, the astrophysics module has a Roentgen X-ray telescope suite of four instruments developed by Britain, the Netherlands, the European Space Agency, and Russia, and an ultraviolet telescope. The telescopes cannot be aimed without orienting the entire Mir complex. The science equip- ment also includes an electrophoresis unit. Kvant-2 docked with Mir in November 1989. The 40-foot-long MTD 950504-5181 module is equipped with an airlock that permits cosmonauts to leave Mir Core Module the module for spacewalks, a central instrument and cargo compart- ment, and an instrument and experiment compartment. The central Kvant-1, the astrophysics module, is equipped for celestial ob- 29 servations and some biotechnology experiments. The 19-foot-long module, which is connected to the aft end of the core module, houses a laboratory with separate areas for instrumentation and living. Kvant-1 docked with Mir in April 1987. Because it does not have its own propulsion system, the astrophysics module had to be delivered to Mir by a Russian space tug. It began its astronomical observations in June 1987 by studying Supernova 1987a in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Plumbing in Kvant-1 allows fuel and other fluids to be trans- ferred to the core module from resupply craft that dock at Kvant-1’s aft port. The fuel is used by attitude thrusters in the core module. Kvant-1, which was originally designed to be part of the Salyut space station, is the only module that docks at the core module’s rear port. Because Kvant-1 blocks the main thrusters on the aft end of the MTD 950504-5184 core module, docked spacecraft have had to perform the station’s orbital maintenance maneuvers. Kvant Astrophysics Module shower is delivered, the crew will use wet wipes for personal hy- giene. Kvant-2 was the first module equipped with the Lyappa arm, which is used to move the modules after they dock with Mir. The arm was attached to a fixture on the docking node and transferred Kvant-2 from the front axial port to one of the radial ports. The Kristall, Spektr, and Priroda modules also have a Lyappa arm. Opposite Kvant-2 is the Kristall technology module, which ar- MTD 950504-5183 rived in June 1990. Kristall (which means “crystal” in Russian) is used to develop zero-g material and biological production techniques. Kvant-2 Module The 39-foot-long module contains an instrument/cargo compartment equipped with materials processing furnaces, biotechnology experi- ment apparatus, a hothouse for growing radishes and lettuce, an compartment can be sealed and used as an extension of or backup to ultraviolet telescope, an Earth resources camera, and several spec- the airlock. trometers. Following STS-71, Kristall was positioned at a radial port between Spektr and Kvant-2. This module supports Earth observation and biological research, 30 including experiments involving specimens that must be exposed to The Kristall module has two docking ports with androgynous the space environment outside the module. The module’s comple- docking mechanisms. The mechanisms are similar to the docking ment of scientific equipment includes a high-resolution camera, a apparatus built by the U.S. and Soviet Union for the Apollo-Soyuz multispectral Earth resources camera, an optical spectrometer, an linkup in 1975. They were designed for docking the Russian Buran infrared spectrometer, an incubator for hatching and raising Japa- but will be used by space shuttle orbiters instead. The Buran, or nese quail, a fluid flow experiment, and panels for monitoring “snow storm,” was the Russian equivalent of the U.S. shuttle orbit- conditions outside the space station. ers. Kvant-2 also delivered a new, faster computer with more memory capability to manage the expanding Mir space station and brought the Russian manned maneuvering unit and new space suits for use on spacewalks. The space station’s attitude control capability was augmented by Kvant-2’s six gyrodynes and 32 thrusters. Kvant-2 is equipped with a system that converts urine into wa- ter, which is then used to produce oxygen. It also has a shower that reclaims and processes the water for reuse. In April 1995, the Mir MTD 950504-5182 crew removed the shower unit and installed a gyrodyne that is used for attitude control when the shuttle docks with Mir. Until a new Kristall Module The 30-foot-long Spektr (“spectrum”) module, which was launched May 1995, adds an Earth-monitoring capability to Mir. It can measure sources of radiation on the Earth, such as active volca- noes, gas torches, and forest fires, and investigate environmental pollution. Investigators will also be able to study the effects of changes in the sun’s activity. Spektr carried more than 1,600 pounds of scientific equipment, two pairs of solar arrays to boost power to the aging Russian station, and a new robotic arm to shuffle the massive Mir modules around in preparation for nine dockings with the shuttle orbiter. Spektr’s solar arrays are now almost fully deployed. The newest addition to the Mir complex is the Priroda module, added in April 1996. Priroda, which means “nature,” supports ex- periments dealing with remote sensing and observation of the Earth. Cosmonauts and astronauts will conduct studies of the Earth’s at- mosphere and surface and will continue experiments begun earlier MTD 960827-5737 on the space station. 31 Priroda Module DOCKING AND BERTHING MECHANISMS Two kinds of mechanisms enable spacecraft to dock with Mir. Probe-and-drogue devices are used to mate the Soyuz and Progress spacecraft with Mir in addition to connecting Kvant-1, Kvant-2, Kristall, and Priroda to the berthing ports on the Mir core module.
Recommended publications
  • Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space
    SSP 54311 Baseline WWW.NASAWATCH.COM Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11 International Space Station Program Baseline June 2006 National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Space Station Program Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Contract Number: NNJ04AA02C WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM REVISION AND HISTORY PAGE REV. DESCRIPTION PUB. DATE - Initial Release (Reference per SSCD XXXXXX, EFF. XX-XX-XX) XX-XX-XX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 CHANGE SHEET Month XX, XXXX Baseline Space Station Control Board Directive XXXXXX/(X-X), dated XX-XX-XX. (X) CHANGE INSTRUCTIONS SSP 54311, Post Increment Evaluation Report Increment 11, has been baselined by the authority of SSCD XXXXXX. All future updates to this document will be identified on this change sheet. WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 Baseline (Reference SSCD XXXXXX, dated XX-XX-XX) LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Month XX, XXXX The current status of all pages in this document is as shown below: Page Change No. SSCD No. Date i - ix Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 1-1 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 2-1 - 2-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 3-1 - 3-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 4-1 - 4-15 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 5-1 - 5-10 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 6-1 - 6-4 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX 7-1 - 7-61 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX A-1 - A-9 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX B-1 - B-3 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX C-1 - C-2 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX D-1 - D-92 Baseline XXXXXX Month XX, XXXX WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 i SSP 54311 Baseline - WWW.NASAWATCH.COM SSCB APPROVAL NOTICE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION PROGRAM POST INCREMENT EVALUATION REPORT INCREMENT 11 JUNE 2006 Michael T.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbital Debris: a Chronology
    NASA/TP-1999-208856 January 1999 Orbital Debris: A Chronology David S. F. Portree Houston, Texas Joseph P. Loftus, Jr Lwldon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas David S. F. Portree is a freelance writer working in Houston_ Texas Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ iv Preface ........................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... vii Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................ ix The Chronology ............................................................................................................. 1 1961 ......................................................................................................................... 4 1962 ......................................................................................................................... 5 963 ......................................................................................................................... 5 964 ......................................................................................................................... 6 965 ......................................................................................................................... 6 966 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler
    Rex D. Hall and David J. Shayler Soyuz A Universal Spacecraft ruuiiMicPublishedu 11in1 aaaundiiuiassociationi witwimh ^^ • Springer Praxis Publishing PRHB Chichester, UK "^UF Table of contents Foreword xvii Authors' preface xix Acknowledgements xxi List of illustrations and tables xxiii Prologue xxix ORIGINS 1 Soviet manned spaceflight after Vostok 1 Design requirements 1 Sever and the 1L: the genesis of Soyuz 3 The Vostok 7/1L Soyuz Complex 4 The mission sequence of the early Soyuz Complex 6 The Soyuz 7K complex 7 Soyuz 7K (Soyuz A) design features 8 The American General Electric concept 10 Soyuz 9K and Soyuz 1 IK 11 The Soyuz Complex mission profile 12 Contracts, funding and schedules 13 Soyuz to the Moon 14 A redirection for Soyuz 14 The N1/L3 lunar landing mission profile 15 Exploring the potential of Soyuz 16 Soyuz 7K-P: a piloted anti-satellite interceptor 16 Soyuz 7K-R: a piloted reconnaissance space station 17 Soyuz VI: the military research spacecraft Zvezda 18 Adapting Soyuz for lunar missions 20 Spacecraft design changes 21 Crewing for circumlunar missions 22 The Zond missions 23 The end of the Soviet lunar programme 33 The lunar orbit module (7K-LOK) 33 viii Table of contents A change of direction 35 References 35 MISSION HARDWARE AND SUPPORT 39 Hardware and systems 39 Crew positions 40 The spacecraft 41 The Propulsion Module (PM) 41 The Descent Module (DM) 41 The Orbital Module (OM) 44 Pyrotechnic devices 45 Spacecraft sub-systems 46 Rendezvous, docking and transfer 47 Electrical power 53 Thermal control 54 Life support 54
    [Show full text]
  • Building and Maintaining the International Space Station (ISS)
    / Building and maintaining the International Space Station (ISS) is a very complex task. An international fleet of space vehicles launches ISS components; rotates crews; provides logistical support; and replenishes propellant, items for science experi- ments, and other necessary supplies and equipment. The Space Shuttle must be used to deliver most ISS modules and major components. All of these important deliveries sustain a constant supply line that is crucial to the development and maintenance of the International Space Station. The fleet is also responsible for returning experiment results to Earth and for removing trash and waste from the ISS. Currently, transport vehicles are launched from two sites on transportation logistics Earth. In the future, the number of launch sites will increase to four or more. Future plans also include new commercial trans- ports that will take over the role of U.S. ISS logistical support. INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION GUIDE TRANSPORTATION/LOGISTICS 39 LAUNCH VEHICLES Soyuz Proton H-II Ariane Shuttle Roscosmos JAXA ESA NASA Russia Japan Europe United States Russia Japan EuRopE u.s. soyuz sL-4 proton sL-12 H-ii ariane 5 space shuttle First launch 1957 1965 1996 1996 1981 1963 (Soyuz variant) Launch site(s) Baikonur Baikonur Tanegashima Guiana Kennedy Space Center Cosmodrome Cosmodrome Space Center Space Center Launch performance 7,150 kg 20,000 kg 16,500 kg 18,000 kg 18,600 kg payload capacity (15,750 lb) (44,000 lb) (36,400 lb) (39,700 lb) (41,000 lb) 105,000 kg (230,000 lb), orbiter only Return performance
    [Show full text]
  • October 2011 Issue 2
    Issue 2 October 2011 All about the Chinese Space Programme GO TAIKONAUTS! Editor’s Note As promised, this issue is delivered as a special issue on the Chinese space station Cover Story programme. The flawless launch of the Tiangong 1 was really ... page 2 Quarterly Report April - June 2011 Launch Events There were two success- ful space launches in the second quarter of 2011. On 10 April 2011 at 4:47:04 Beijing Time, a Long March 3A (Y19) lifted-off from Pad 3 in Xichang Satellite Launch Centre, putting the Beidou IGSO 3 navigation sat- ellite into orbit. It was the first Chinese Dawn of the Chinese Space Station Era space launch of 2011 and the eighth op- A Textbook Launch erational Beidou satellite. The satellite History turned a new page at 21:16:03 Beijing Time on 29 September 2011, entered its working orbit ... page 3 when a Long March 2F (CZ-2F T1) rocket lifted-off from Pad 921 at the Jiu- quan Satellite Launch Centre in China. In contrast with other launch vehicles that took-off from the same pad on previous occasions, ... page 6 Proposal Mutual Rescue Operations Between the On The Spot Tiangong and ISS? Background Touch the Chinese Space Programme in Three Days The ISS began six-crew member opera- Report from the 4th CSA-IAA Conference on Advanced Space Technology tion in 2009, and the U.S. shuttle retired in Shanghai in July 2011. Crew transportation and An Open and International Conference emergency rescue now totally depends To the Chinese space programme and people paying attention to it, early upon the Russian Soyuz vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Closing Comments
    Closing Comments The concept of a Shuttle supporting the assembly of a space station was not an entirely new idea when Space Station Freedom was authorized in 1984. Such concepts had been evaluated during the late 1960s, as the United States and the Soviet Union competed in the race to the Moon. By the early 1970s, the two nations were on more friendly terms and keen to participate in a joint project as Apollo was being phased out and a series of Salyut space stations were being introduced. The American proposal for an Apollo to dock with a Salyut was rejected, as was a proposal to have a Soyuz dock with Skylab. So Apollo docked with Soyuz in the summer of 1975. That program was so successful that talks began almost immediately to assess the pros- pects for a Shuttle-Salyut docking in the early 1980s. In parallel, NASA devised plans for the Shuttle to reactivate Skylab. Neither of these proposals bore fruit. By the early 1980s, the idea of using a Shuttle to assemble and resupply a large space station remained, and would become the lynchpin of the Space Station Freedom before plans for that, too, were revised. By the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 the assembly of Mir had been underway for several years. But Russia, which inherited the station and the spacecraft which serviced it, was hard pressed to continue the requisite funding. Looking back two decades to the 1990s, the merger of the American Shuttle and the Russian space station programs seems so logical, since they complemented each other.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Space Program: an Overview
    Order Code RS21641 Updated October 18, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China’s Space Program: An Overview Marcia S. Smith Specialist in Aerospace and Telecommunications Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary The People’s Republic of China successfully completed its second human spaceflight mission on October 17, 2005. China is only the third country, after Russia and the United States, able to launch people into space. Its first human spaceflight was in 2003 when a single astronaut, or “taikonaut,” made a flight lasting slightly less than a day. The 2005 flight lasted five days, and involved two taikonauts. As the United States embarks upon President Bush’s “Vision for Space Exploration” to return astronauts to the Moon by 2020 and someday send them to Mars, some may view China’s entrance into the human exploration of space as a competitive threat, while others may view China as a potential partner. This report will be updated as warranted. Introduction China has been launching satellites since 1970. Most of the launches are of Chinese communications, weather, remote sensing, navigation, or scientific satellites. Some of those satellites may be for military applications, or are dual use. Some were commercial launches for foreign countries or companies, primarily placing communications satellites into orbit. China launched its first astronaut, or “taikonaut,”1 in October 2003. China has three space launch sites: Jiuquan (also called Shuang Cheng-tzu) in the Gobi desert; Xichang, in southeastern China (near Chengdu); and Taiyuan, south of Beijing. Jiuquan was China’s first launch site, and is used for launches of a variety of spacecraft, including those related to the human spaceflight program.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo-Soyuz Test Project
    --.I m ...ir,,.= The document_-contains materials on the Soyuz-Apollo test and consists of two parts, prepared by the USSR and USA sides res- pectively. Both parts outline the purposes and program of the mission, the spacecraft design, the flight plan and information on Joint and unilateral scientific experiments. Brief biographies of the cosmonauts and astronauts, the Joint mission crew members_ are also presented. The document covers technical support activities providing mission control and gives information about the ASTP Soviet and American leaders. As the USSR and USA parts of the document have been prepared independently, there might be duplication in the sections dealing with the Joint activities. The document is intended for press representatives and various mass information means. CONTENTS Page I.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................... 10 1.1 Background ......................................... I0 1,2 Apollo-Soyuz joint test project objectives .......... 13 2.0 COMPATIBILITY PROBLEMS ................... ......... • 15 2.1 Spacecraft compatibility conditions and principal solutions accepted for Apollo-Ssyuz Test Mission .... 15 2.2 Compatibility of ground flight control personnel ... 18 2_3 Methodological compatibility ....................... 20 3.0 SOYUZ SPACECRAFT ................................... 22 3.1 PurPose. Brief data on Soyuz spacecraft flights .... 22 3.2 Soyuz spacecraft description ....................... 25 3.2.1 General description of the Soyuz spacecraft.. 25 Main characteristics ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceport News America’S Gateway to the Universe
    July 28, 2000 Vol. 39, No. 15 Spaceport News America’s gateway to the universe. Leading the world in preparing and launching missions to Earth and beyond. http://www-pao.ksc.nasa.gov/kscpao/snews/snewstoc.htm John F. Kennedy Space Center Zvezda takes flight Launch of key component heralds new phase of International Space Station Destined to transform the for the Station. International Space Station into a At press time, the module was new home in orbit, the Russian- operating well in an orbit with a built Zvezda living quarters high point of about 221 statute module lifted off flawlessly from the miles and a low point of 115 Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakh- statute miles. stan, at 12:56 a.m. on July 15. Flight controllers at the Russian Only 15 minutes after its launch Mission Control Center in aboard a Russian Proton booster, Korolev, Russia, were continuing the new module was safely in orbit, to activate and check out the with its antennas, solar arrays and module’s systems, fire its engines other exterior equipment perfectly periodically to adjust its orbit, and extended. prepare for a docking with the In addition to serving as the Space Station. early station living quarters, The Station was set to begin a Zvezda will be the main docking final rendezvous with Zvezda, port for Russian Progress cargo culminating in a docking planned resupply vehicles. It also will at about 8:45 p.m. July 25. At top, a Proton rocket lifts the Zvezda module from the Baikonur provide early propulsive attitude Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And
    Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Manned Space Flights Spacecalc
    CBS News Manned Space Flights Current through STS-117 Table of Manned Space Flights SpaceCalc Total: 260 Crew Launch Land Duration By Robert A. Braeunig* Vostok 1 Yuri Gagarin 04/12/61 04/12/61 1h:48m First manned space flight (1 orbit). MR 3 Alan Shepard 05/05/61 05/05/61 15m:22s First American in space (suborbital). Freedom 7. MR 4 Virgil Grissom 07/21/61 07/21/61 15m:37s Second suborbital flight; spacecraft sank, Grissom rescued. Liberty Bell 7. Vostok 2 Guerman Titov 08/06/61 08/07/61 1d:01h:18m First flight longer than 24 hours (17 orbits). MA 6 John Glenn 02/20/62 02/20/62 04h:55m First American in orbit (3 orbits); telemetry falsely indicated heatshield unlatched. Friendship 7. MA 7 Scott Carpenter 05/24/62 05/24/62 04h:56m Initiated space flight experiments; manual retrofire error caused 250 mile landing overshoot. Aurora 7. Vostok 3 Andrian Nikolayev 08/11/62 08/15/62 3d:22h:22m First twinned flight, with Vostok 4. Vostok 4 Pavel Popovich 08/12/62 08/15/62 2d:22h:57m First twinned flight. On first orbit came within 3 miles of Vostok 3. MA 8 Walter Schirra 10/03/62 10/03/62 09h:13m Developed techniques for long duration missions (6 orbits); closest splashdown to target to date (4.5 miles). Sigma 7. MA 9 Gordon Cooper 05/15/63 05/16/63 1d:10h:20m First U.S. evaluation of effects of one day in space (22 orbits); performed manual reentry after systems failure, landing 4 miles from target.
    [Show full text]