Toxins in Food
EDITED BY Waldemar M. Da˛browski Ph.D., D.Sc Professor Department of Food Microbiology Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries Agricultural University of Szczecin, Poland
Zdzislaw⁄ E. Sikorski Ph.D., D.Sc Professor Department of Food Chemistry, Technology and Biotechnology Faculty of Chemistry Gdan´sk University of Technology, Poland
CRC PRESS Boca Raton London New York Washington, D.C.
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Toxins in food / edited by Waldemar M. Dabrowski and Zdzislaw E. Sikorski. p. cm. – (Chemical and functional properties of food series) ISBN 0-8493-1904-8 (alk. paper) 1. Food–Toxicology. 2. Toxins. I. Dabrowski, Waldemar M. II. Sikorski, Zdzislaw E. III. Chemical and functional properties of food components series
RA1258.T727 2004 615.9054–dc22 2004050301
Thisbookcontainsinformationobtainedfromauthenticandhighlyregardedsources.Reprinted materialisquotedwithpermission,andsourcesareindicated.Awidevarietyofreferencesare listed.Reasonableeffortshavebeenmadetopublishreliabledataandinformation,buttheauthor andthepublishercannotassumeresponsibilityforthevalidityofallmaterialsorforthe consequencesoftheiruse. Neitherthisbooknoranypartmaybereproducedortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans, electronicormechanical,includingphotocopying,microfilming,andrecording,orbyany informationstorageorretrievalsystem,withoutpriorpermissioninwritingfromthepublisher. TheconsentofCRCPressLLCdoesnotextendtocopyingforgeneraldistribution,forpromotion, forcreatingnewworks,orforresale.SpecificpermissionmustbeobtainedinwritingfromCRC PressLLCforsuchcopying. DirectallinquiriestoCRCPressLLC,2000N.W.CorporateBlvd.,BocaRaton,Florida33431. TrademarkNotice:Productorcorporatenamesmaybetrademarksorregisteredtrademarks,and areusedonlyforidentificationandexplanation,withoutintenttoinfringe.
VisittheCRCPressWebsiteatwww.crcpress.com
# 2005 by CRC Press LLC No claim to original U.S. Government works International Standard Book Number 0-8493-1904-8 Library of Congress Card Number 2004050301 Printed in the United States of America 1234567890 Printed on acid-free paper
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC Preface
Globalization,thecharacteristictrendofthepastfewdecades,affectsfood throughmassproductioninmega-processingplantsandbyglobaldistribution ofproductsthatonceusedtobesoldlocally.Thedevelopmentsinfood technologyalsoincludeverysignificantimprovementsinhygieneoffood production.Novelsystems,suchasGMP,HACCPorTFQM,arebeing introducedtoassureahighstandardoffoodquality.However,foodborne poisoningsstillposeaveryserioushazardtoconsumers’health,bothin developedandindevelopingcountries;dueinparttoalackofknowledge amongsomeproducersandconsumersregardingtherisksandbenefitsrelated tofood.Thus,theupdatingofinformationonfoodbornepoisoningagentsis anessentialelementfortheimprovementoffoodhygiene. Thisbookcontainsaconcise,yetwell-documented,presentationofthe currentstateofknowledgeonthecontent,chemicalproperties,modesof action,andbiologicaleffectsoftoxinsoccurringinfood.Thefirstchapter offersauniqueintroduction,outliningthecurrenttoxicologicalhazards connectedwithfood.Chapters2,3,4,6,and7describethetoxinsthat occurnaturallyinrawmaterials,suchasplantandmushroomtoxins,biogenic amines,andfishtoxins,whilechapters8to12dealwithtoxiccompounds presentinfoodsduetoneglectduringprocessingorasaresultof environmentalorraw-materialcontamination,suchasbacterialtoxins, mycotoxins,heavymetals,pesticides,andantibiotics.Toxicsubstancesthat maybegeneratedinfoodduringprocessing,packaging,andstorageare presentedinchapters13and14.Thehealthaspectsoffoodallergiesandthe medicalimpactoftoxinsinfoodarediscussedinchapters5and15. In preparing this book, we have been fortunate to work with highly- qualified specialists in the respective areas from the U.S. and Europe, who accepted our invitation and agreed to all reasonable editorial suggestions. The monographic chapters are based on their personal research experience and on critical evaluation of the present knowledge, as presented in the current world literature. We are pleased to acknowledge their collaboration. Thanks to their expertise, this volume may become a valuable source of information not only for food scientists, food technology, biology and biotechnology students, but also for all persons interested in food safety. We are honored to dedicate this book to Dr. Eleanor Riemer, who heartily promoted the idea of establishing the series Chemical and Functional Properties of Food Components and helped the editors to shape the volumes according to the needs of the potential readers. Thank you, Eleanor, for your contribution.
Waldemar Dabrowski and Zdzislaw E. Sikorski
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC About the Editors
Waldemar Dabrowski received an M.Sc. degree from the Faculty of Biology and the Earth Sciences at the University of Lo´dz´, Poland, a Ph.D. from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland, and a D.Sc. from the Medical University of Poznan´, Poland. He worked for several years as a lecturer in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology of the Pomeranian Medical University of Szczecin. Later, for almost six years, he was in charge of a microbiological laboratory in Libya. At present, he is a professor in the Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries and head of the Department of Food Microbiology at the Agricultural University of Szczecin, Poland. He has published approximately 120 papers, mainly in food microbiology, medical microbiology, and immunology. His research focuses on food microbiology, particularly on the presence and intraspecies diversity of Listeria monocytogenes isolates from food and food-processing environments. Zdzisbaw E. Sikorski received his Ph.D. and D.Sc. from the Gdan´sk University of Technology, and an additional doctorate from the Agricultural University in Szczecin. He gained practical experience in several food industry plants in Poland and Germany, as well as on a fishing trawler. He was organizer and head of the Department of Food Chemistry and Technology. He served for five years as Dean of the Faculty of Chemistry at Gdan´sk University of Technology and for seven years as chairman of the Committee of Food Technology and Chemistry of the Polish Academy of Sciences. He worked as researcher/professor in the Department of Agricultural Biochemistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; CSIRO in Hobart, Australia; DSIR in Auckland, New Zealand; and National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung. His research deals mainly with functional properties of food proteins and interactions of food components. He has published approximately 210 journal papers, 14 books (in Polish, English, Russian or Spanish), nine chapters on marine food science and food chemistry in other books, and holds seven patents. In 2003, he was elected a fellow of the International Academy of Food Science and Technology.
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC ListofContributors
Chapter1 WaldemarDabrowski,Ph.D.,D.Sc. Professor DepartmentofFoodMicrobiology, FacultyofFoodSciencesandFisheries, AgriculturalUniversityofSzczecin,Poland [email protected] Chapter2 KipE.Panter,Ph.D. ResearchAnimalScientist USDAARSPoisonousPlantResearchLaboratory,Logan,UT,USA [email protected] Chapter3 HeinzFaulstich,Ph.D. Professor Max-Planck-Institutfu¨rZellbiologie,Rosenhof,Germany [email protected] Chapter4 PaolaAlbertazzi,Ph.D. SeniorLecturer CentreforMetabolicBoneDisease,Hull,UnitedKingdom [email protected] Chapter5 Elzbiez_ taKucharska,M.D.,Ph.D. AssistantProfessor DepartmentofHumanNutrition, FacultyofFoodSciencesandFisheries, AgriculturalUniversityofSzczecin,Poland [email protected] Chapter6 George J. Flick, Jr. Ph.D. University Distinguished Professor Food Science and Technology Department Virginia Polytechnic Institute Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A. fl[email protected] Linda Ankenman Granata, Ph.D. Food Science and Technology Department Virginia Polytechnic Institute Blacksburg, VA, U.S.A.
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC Chapter7 LorraineC.Backer,Ph.D.,MPH NationalCenterforEnvironmentalHealth, CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention, Atlanta,Georgia,U.S.A. [email protected] HelenSchurz-Rogers,Ph.D. NationalCenterforEnvironmentalHealth, CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention, Atlanta,Georgia,U.S.A. [email protected] LoraE.Fleming,M.D.,Ph.D.,MPH AssociateProfessor, NIEHSMarineandFreshwaterBiomedicalSciencesCenter, RosenstielSchoolofMarineandAtmosphericSciences, UniversityofMiami,VirginiaKey,Florida,U.S.A. lfl[email protected] BarbaraKirkpatrick,Ed.D. MoteMarineLaboratory,Sarasota,Florida,U.S.A. [email protected] JanetBenson,Ph.D.,DABT, LovelaceRespiratoryResearchInstitute,Albuquerque,NewMexico,U.S.A. [email protected]
Chapter8 WaldemarDabrowski,Ph.D.,D.Sc. Professor DepartmentofFoodMicrobiology, FacultyofFoodSciencesandFisheries, AgriculturalUniversityofSzczecin,Poland [email protected] DagmaraMedrala,Ph.D. DepartmentofFoodMicrobiology, FacultyofFoodSciencesandFisheries, AgriculturalUniversityofSzczecin,Poland [email protected]
Chapter9 Ana M. Calvo, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Biological Science, Northern Illinois University DeKalb, Illinois, U.S.A. [email protected]
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC Chapter10 Miko b ajProtasowicki,Ph.D.,D.Sc. Professor DepartmentofToxicology, FacultyofFoodSciencesandFisheries, AgriculturalUniversityofSzczecin,Poland [email protected]
Chapter11 CarlK.Winter,Ph.D. Director,FoodSafeProgramand ExtensionFoodToxicologist DepartmentofFoodScienceandTechnology UniversityofCalifornia Davis,California,U.S.A. [email protected]
Chapter12 StanleyK.Katz,Ph.D. DepartmentofBiochemistryandMicrobiology, NewBrunswick,NewJersey,U.S.A. [email protected] Paula-MarieL.Ward,Ph.D. DepartmentofBiochemistryandMicrobiology, NewBrunswick,NewJersey,U.S.A. [email protected].
Chapter13 Zdzis b awE.Sikorski,Ph.D.,D.Sc. Professor DepartmentofFoodChemistry,TechnologyandBiotechnology, Gdan´skUniversityofTechnology,Poland [email protected]
Chapter14 BarbaraPiotrowska,Ph.D. DepartmentofFoodChemistry,TechnologyandBiotechnology, Gdan´skUniversityofTechnology,Poland [email protected]
Chapter15 Elzzbieta_ Kucharska, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Food Sciences and Fisheries, Agricultural University of Szczecin, Poland [email protected]
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC Table of Contents
Chapter1Introduction Waldemar Dabrowski, Ph.D., D.Sc. Chapter2NaturalToxinsofPlantOrigin Kip E. Panter, Ph.D. Chapter3MushroomToxins Heinz Faulstich, Ph.D. Chapter4PhytoestrogensinFoodPlants Paola Albertazzi, Ph.D. Chapter5FoodAllergiesandFoodIntolerance Elzz_bieta Kucharska, M.D., Ph.D. Chapter6BiogenicAminesinFood George J. Flick, Jr. Ph.D. and L. Ankenman Granata, Ph.D. Chapter7MarinePhycotoxinsinSeafood Lorraine C. Backer, Ph.D., Helen Schurz-Rogers, Ph.D., Lora E. Fleming, M.D., Ph.D., MPH, Barbara Kirkpatrick, Ed.D. Janet Benson, Ph.D., DABT Chapter8BacterialToxins Waldemar Dabrowski, Ph.D., D.Sc. and Dagmara Medrala, Ph.D. Chapter9Mycotoxins Ana M. Calvo, Ph.D. Chapter10HeavyMetals Mikolaj Protasowicki, Ph.D., D.Sc. Chapter11PesticidesinFood Carl K. Winter, Ph.D. Chapter12AntibioticandHormoneResiduesinFoodsandtheir Significance Stanley K. Katz, Ph.D., and Paula-Marie L. Ward, Ph.D. Chapter13TheEffectofProcessingontheNutritionalValueand ToxicityofFoods Zdzislaw E. Sikorski, Ph.D., D.Sc. Chapter14ToxicComponentsofFoodPackagingMaterials Barbara Piotrowska, Ph.D. Chapter15EpidemiologicalandMedicalImpactofToxinsinFoods Elzz_bieta Kucharska, M.D., Ph.D.
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC 1 Introduction
Waldemar Dabrowski
CONTENTS
1.1ToxinsinFood–ThePastandThePresent 1.2FoodContamination 1.3TheEffectsofFoodComponentsonHumans 1.4WhatAffectsFoodSafetyIssuesToday? 1.4.1PopulationChanges 1.4.2TrendsinFoodProduction 1.5FoodAllergyorFoodIntolerance? 1.6LinksBetweenFoodandHealth–TracingaHumanGenome 1.7Conclusions 1.8References
1.1 TOXINS IN FOOD – THE PAST AND THE PRESENT Air, water, soil, and food are all unavoidable components of the human environment. Each of those elements influences the quality of human life, and each of them may be contaminated. Food is not only the elementary source of nutrients, but may also contain natural chemical substances with toxic properties, e.g., cyanogenic glycosides (many plants), solanine (green parts of potatoes, sprouted potatoes, and potatoes stored in light), industrial pollutants (heavy metals), biogenic amines (fish), or mycotoxins (moldy foodstuffs). Poisons have been used since the dawn of civilization, especially at royal courts, to eliminate opponents and to put condemned prisoners to death. They also have been used for hunting (e.g., curare) or for ritual ceremonies in primitive tribes. Hemlock (Conium maculatum L.) is one of the oldest poisons known. In 399 B.C. Socrates was condemned to death by the Athenian court and forced to drink hemlock. Both Caligula and Cleopatra were known to have eliminated their victims by using poisoned food or giving poisoned flower garlands to guests. In the Middle Ages poisoning was the most popular form of convincing a political antagonist of one’s rights. The Renaissance Italian family of Borgia was suspected of the most sophisticated murders, committed with arsenic added to foods, candle wicks, or book paper, although this is not confirmed by historians. Historical sources say that the fear of poisoning caused Henry IV of France to eat only eggs that he had cooked himself and to drink only water that he had drawn himself from the Seine river. A significant historical discovery was that an antidote to arsenic poisoning is the ingestion of gradually increasing doses of the poison: rather
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC than accumulating in the human body, the higher doses of arsenic are excreted in the stool. Similarly, a habit of taking arsenic with foodstuffs developed about 200 years ago among the uplanders in northern Syria and in the Austrian Tyrol. This did not lead to fatal poisonings, but caused an illusive feeling of energy boost that could be used to overcome exhaustion. In the same way, since the 16th century, old horses were fed with small amounts of arsenic to temporarily improve their vitality and energy in order to deceive buyers at horse markets. These anecdotes show the truth in the statement by Paracelsus, that ‘‘All things are poison and nothing is without poison. Dosage alone determines poisoning.’’ This phenomenon is fundamental for homeopathy, a branch of alternative medicine, which suggests treating particular syndromes by using minimal doses of medicines that in higher amounts would trigger the same disease symptoms among healthy individuals (‘similia similibus curantur’). In the 21st century the term ‘food terrorism’ was coined, which highlights the possibility of deliberate use of food as a vector for orally-ingested toxins in terrorist attacks. As well as being used for intentional poisonings, toxic substances present in plants or spoiled foods have been the causes of accidental poisonings, frequently epidemic and leading to death. Medieval examples include ergot poisonings, known as ignis sacer (holy fire) or ignis Sancti Antonii (St. Anthony’s fire) (a French outbreak in 994 A.D. led to over 40 000 deaths), while contemporary poisonings may be caused by, for example, preserves containing Clostridium botulinum spores, poisonous mushrooms being mis- taken for edible Agaricus campestris, or fish contaminated with mercury compounds (the Minamata disease outbreak in Japan in 1958).
1.2 FOOD CONTAMINATION Food may be contaminated directly or indirectly. Direct contamination occurs when a toxic substance is present in raw food materials, whereas indirect contaminants get into food during processing, storage, handling, or preparation. Indirect contaminants also include substances that become toxic and harmful to people due to food processing practices. Indirect contamina- tion is most frequently the result of ignorance, lack of education of food handlers, inadequate space, poor facility design, or improper handling practices. Contrary to popular belief, application of chemical substances, such as pesticides or fertilizers, in food production is not as harmful as rumors and urban myths would seem to indicate. Pesticides eliminate pests that would otherwise be a frequent cause of poisoning of grains, vegetables, and fruit due to the toxic products of their metabolisms. Chemically synthesized fertilizers are more easily detectable in food than their natural substitutes, which facilitates their adoption for use on food products (Moghissi 1998).
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC 1.3 THE EFFECTS OF FOOD COMPONENTS ON HUMANS Pathogenic actions of food components on the human body may manifest as intoxication, allergy or intolerance. In developed countries, between 300 and 1000 kg of food annually passes through the intestinal tract of an adult person. If toxic compounds are present, even in low concentrations, they may result in a cumulative effect that leads to disease symptoms. Results and symptoms of foodborne poisonings may have acute, subacute, or mild courses. Patients with mild and subacute symptoms of poisonings usually do not seek or do not need medical treatment, therefore such cases are not registered by health services and so statistics often do not show actual rates of occurrence. Symptoms of poisoning may affect all or only few individuals in a particular population. Symptoms may be divided into early, late, and delayed; early symptoms occur a few hours after toxin ingestion, late symptoms up to several days after, and delayed symptoms affect patients after some weeks, or even months. The most dangerous situation involves delayed, subacute symptoms that do not affect all individuals in an analyzed population. In such a cases, a relationship between consumed food and disease symptoms is practically impossible to confirm and may lead to a misdiagnosis. The control of dangerous reactions to components in foods is not as widely conducted as is the monitoring of side effects caused by pharmaceuticals. This problem results mainly from the complexity of food matrices, and from the limited possibilities for attributing specific effects to particular food compo- nents.
1.4 WHAT AFFECTS FOOD SAFETY ISSUES TODAY? Modern food toxicology is defined by changes within the population and changes in food production. Consumer requirements transform the food market and lead indirectly to progress in the food-processing industry. However, an increasing gap is observed in Europe between innovations in food technology and consumers’ competence in handling food, which may lead to the development of a food-illiterate population that neglects food-hygiene risks and does not understand food-related health problems (Oltersdorf, 2003).
1.4.1 POPULATION CHANGES Changes currently affecting populations include changes to demographic structure and to health conditions. In developed countries, an increase in the number of elderly, immunocompromized (including AIDS affected patients), allergic, and diabetic people, as well as patients receiving prolonged treatment with corticosteroids or cytotoxic medicines, has become a new trend for populations. Elderly and sick people require specific diets, which impact on patterns of food consumption. There is clear evidence that the impacts of
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC medical progress and improved environmental conditions lead to better health in human populations in developed countries. In developing countries, however, where the low quality of life, poor sanitary conditions, poor standards of food processing, storage and handling, and poor-quality drinking water obtained from contaminated sources, increase morbidity in diseases acquired via the gastrointestinal tracts. Food poisonings also occur endemically, and concern food that is produced and consumed locally, e.g., Japanese fish fugu, or particular mushroom species. Lifestyle changes caused by urbanization in industrial countries also lead to changes in food processing methods. People eat more frequently in restaurants, cafeterias, canteens, or fast-food chains, where food is processed in large quantities, even before it is needed, and a decline in the number of home- prepared meals is also observed. These factors do not seem to increase the actual number of foodborne disease outbreaks, but rather make the consequences of each outbreak more severe – mass production of food means that an outbreak may affect many more people than would an outbreak caused by food served at a home dinner table. Changes in populations’ lifestyles make new demands on food producers. Producers now have to try to meet requirements for food products for diabetics or people with allergies (so called ‘functional foods,’ including foods for special dietary use, medical foods, and dietary supplements), as well as having to expand their offering of food products for people who prefer heat-and-serve food or so-called ‘organic’ (practically non-processed) food. New classes of food products are being developed constantly to fulfil specific demands of particular segments of the consumer market. These developments can, however, have an impact on food safety. In the example of meeting consumers’ demands for refrigerated ready-to-eat products, one result has been an increase in intoxication caused by enterotoxins of opportunistic pathogens, such as Clostridium perfringens, the spores which may survive such drastic conditions as cooking at 100 C for one hour (Novak and Juneja, 2002). Additionally, ‘population heterogeneity’ causes some subpopulations to be more susceptible ‘target groups’ than others, and, more significantly, to some of the most natural and basic components of foods. Nuts are an example of a food that was consumed without any health risk for years, but which now triggers an increasing number of acute anaphylactic reactions among consumers. Another example was the ingestion of the aminoacid tryptophan in the 1980s, which was used as an antidepressant and by bodybuilders but led to muscle degradation or acute eosinophilic-myalgia syndrome (EMS), resulting in 37 deaths and 1500 permanent injuries. The problems were due to presence of PAA (3-phenylaminoalanin) and EBT (1.1 0-ethylidenebistryptophan) in the preparations that were sold. The outbreak did not affect all people taking tryptophan to the same degree, which led to a hypothesis that the disease developed within a subpopulation characterized by a particular metabolic pathway (Lazarus, 1996; Simat et al., 1996).
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC 1.4.2TRENDSINFOODPRODUCTION Novelfoods,whichincludeartificially-synthesizedorgenetically-modified foods, createachallengeforfoodsafetymonitoring. Evenifnovelfoodspass standardsafetyassessments,theymaygeneratedelayedrisksthatresultin problemswhichappearsuddenlyinasusceptiblesubpopulation.Totake populationheterogeneityintoaccount,itispossiblethatinthefuturethesafety ofnovelfoods willbetestedbyhumantrials,asisstandardpracticein pharmacologicalresearchonnewmedicines(Lazarus,1996). Novelfoodsaretheextremeexampleofchangesinfoodproduction.Other innovationsincludeextendingthe shelflifeofproductsbyusingnovel packagingmaterialsorthroughuseof newfoodadditives. Productpackagingis notonlyattractivetoconsumers,but alsoenablesthe extensionofshelflifeforitscontentbyprotectingagainstmicrobiological, biological,andchemicalalterations.Presently,over30differentplastics are beingusedaspackagingmaterialstomeettherequirementsofproducersand consumers.Inaddition,differenttypesofadditives–suchasantioxidants, stabilizers,lubricants,and anti-staticandanti-blockingagents–have been developedtoimproveperformance,eitherduringtheprocessingandproduc- tion ofthefoods,orduringapplicationofthepolymericpackagingmaterials. Thereisclearevidencethatthepackaging andstorageoffoodcanleadto productcontamination;componentsofthepackagingmaterialscanmigrate intothe food(LauandWong,2000).Thetoxicologicalaspectsofpackaging materialsareexhaustivelydescribedinChapter13ofthisvolume. Toxicological studies on direct food additives have revealed toxic and harmful actions. Food dyes and preservatives have been used since ancient Roman times to improve the color of wine or to disinfect wine containers. The development of chemistry led to many unwise experiments, such as the dying of food with copper, chrome, lead, mercury, arsenic, and cadmium salts. In the U.S. in 1906, over 300 food dyes were officially tested, of which only seven passed and were allowed to be used in food. Only two of them – erythrosine and idigotine – are permitted now. The lists of preservatives are also constantly modified in different countries. Quite recently, formic acid, which is used to preserve semi-products, was banned in Poland due to its deleterious effects. Deleterious effects can also be exerted by components which have pharmacotherapeutic properties but which are perceived not to be harmful, e.g., niacin. In 1983, 14 people suffered from acute onset of rash, pruritis, and sensation of warmth after consumption of pumpernickel bagels. Studies revealed that the pumpernickel flour was enriched with large amounts of niacin, containing 60 times the normal level. Each bagel contained approxi- mately 190 mg of niacin, whereas the recommended daily intake is about 13 mg per day for the average adult (Sevchick et al., 1983). Patterson et al. (1983) highlighted the fact that chronic use of excessive doses of niacin by persons taking large amounts of vitamins may lead to hepatitis. Indirect food additives, which are the most frequent sources of poisoning- like diseases, are not natural food components. They enter food as
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC contaminantsfromtheenvironmentduringprocessing,packaging,and storage. Antibioticsgiventofarmanimals,pesticideresidues,orchemicals thatmigratefrom foodpackagingareexamplesofsuch indirectadditives.An exampleofanillegal indirectadditiveisthedeliberateapplicationofnitrofuran drugs(syntheticantibioticsbannedinthe1990sduetotheirmutagenic, tumorigenic,andcytotoxicproperties)inpig,poultry,andfishproduction. Thisusewasrevealedbynew analyticalmethods,andabuseofthesedrugshas beenshownto beaglobalproblemthataffectscountriesrangingfrom Thailand,viaChina,toRomania (Draiscietal.,1997;MacCrackenand Kennedy, 1997;MacCrackenetal.,2000;Kennedy,2003).Itwouldbedifficult nottoagreewiththosewhosaythat‘‘animalfeedmustnotserveasthedustbin forwasteproducers,’’especiallyafter Europe’slatestfoodcontamination incident –syntheticprogesteronewasfoundinproducts rangingfromanimal feedtosoftdrinks(Rogers,2003). Italsoappears thattraditionalformsoffoodprocessing maynotbeassafe asexpected.Theexampleoftheformationofacrylamideindifferentheat- processedfoods maybecited(seeChapter13ofthis volume). However, there are no incontrovertible answers to the questions: is acrylamide in food harmful for consumers?, and what is the average intake? The American Council on Science and Health states that there is ‘‘no credible evidence that acrylamide in foods poses human cancer risk.’’ New Zealand food safety experts, using a ‘no observable adverse effect level’ for acrylamide of 0.1 mg per kg bodyweight, also estimate that people eating fried potatos and crisps (products suspected to contain the largest amounts of acrylamide) are a very low risk of cancer from this source. European Union experts decided that the risk of exposure to polyacrylamide in food remains undetermined (Sharp, 2003). The possibility of aluminum migration and its perniciousness were noticed at the beginning of 1980s. Aluminum is widely distributed in foodstuffs, at concentrations higher in plant than in animal food. Orally-consumed aluminum is increasingly considered to be a contaminant of the food chain, playing a role in the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases such as Morbus Alzheimer and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In the past, aluminum has been always considered as harmless, even if it was present in the environment. The main sources of orally-consumed aluminum are food materials, food additives, containers, kitchen utensils, packaging containing aluminum, and drinking water (Mu¨ ller et al., 1998). A very high level of aluminum was also detected in chewing gum (from 3.5 to 4.5 mg per 5 g stick) (Kupchella and Syty, 1980; Varo et al., 1980). However, it turned out that during chewing, only from 0.01 to 0.046 mg of aluminum per stick is released (Lione and Smith, 1982). Even though high doses of aluminum are present in foods consumed only rarely and in small quantities (e.g., cocoa, cocoa products, spices, black tea leaves), the population that is susceptible to aluminum (e.g., patients with chronic renal failure who cannot excrete aluminum via the renal pathway and so accumulate it at toxic levels) cannot be ignored as such a syndrome affects 5% of the population. Because the role of aluminum in etiology of neurodegenerative diseases is unknown, its presence in food cannot be neglected.
Copyright © 2005 CRC Press LLC 1.5 FOOD ALLERGY OR FOOD INTOLERANCE? Between 12 and 20% of Americans, British and Dutch people complain about food allergies. In fact, problems are more likely to be due to food intolerance rather than actual allergy. This has been confirmed by skin-prick tests, analysis of immunoglobulin E level in serum, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests which found food intolerance in 2 to 5% of adults and 6 to 13% of children (age 1 to 6) in Europe. Challenge-proved adverse reaction to food is one tenth of that perceived and allergic reactions to chemicals and additives in food are even more rare. A similar ratio occurs in Asia. The dietary habits in different countries determine the observed rates of food sensitivities. Sensitivity to fish occurs frequently in Scandinavia, to rice in Japan, to peanuts in the U.S. and the U.K., and to seafood and milk in Italy. It also means that communities not exposed to particular allergens are not affected as frequently by various forms of sensitivities, e.g., allergy to peanuts is rare in Scandinavia where peanuts are not a popular snack, and allergy to seafood is uncommon in populations separated from bodies of water (Samartin et al., 2001). Artificial additives, industrial pollutants, and other chemicals present in contemporary food are often blamed for the increasing rates of food allergies (Halstensen et al., 1997). In the draft proposal for European Council and Parliament Directive III/5909/97 (16 January, 1998), a so-called ‘hit list’ of major serious allergens (MSAs), which contains ten food ingredients or substances that have to be indicated as allergenic or incompatibility inducing, was presented. Foods and ingredients that are recognized as being responsible for increased allergenic sensitivity, and which have to be declared on lists of ingredients, include: