Preliminary Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Program MiddleMiddle EastEast StudiesStudies AssociationAssociation 4646thth AnnualAnnual MeetingMeeting NovemberNovember 17-2017-20 Preliminary Program Denver, in the Middle Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel 2012 will be MESA's first annual meeting in Denver. Why Denver, you ask? MESA seldom meets in the middle of the country and Denver is sort of in the middle. It is the largest metro area near the middle with the exception of Kansas City. Denver has 600,000 residents in its city limits, but 2.5 million live in the metro area. Denver is easy to get to: 3 airlines use it as a hub–Frontier, Southwest and United. East coasters will be able to find direct flights and west coasters will have distance to travel on their side. Denver offers a clean, safe, and vibrant downtown with an impressive arts and culture scene. World class museums, art galleries/districts, theater, music, and splendid examples 1550 Court Place of Victorian architecture are some of the things that make Denver CO 80202 Denver memorable. Our conference hotel also happens to 303 893-3333 800 325-3535 enjoy a fabulous location on Denver's 16th Street Mall–a tree- http://www.sheratondenverdowntown.com/ lined,16-block pedestrian promenade, closed to traffic except for free shuttle buses that run up and down it. The 16th Street Mall has a good feel, and shopping, dining, public art, and Rates/Reservations walkable proximity to most attractions are just a few of the Cutoff Date $179 single/double perks it offers. October 22 $199 triple Why Denver, you ask, again? The Denver Sheraton $219 quad Downtown Hotel has enough sleeping rooms and meeting https://www.starwoodmeeting.com/Book/MESA2012 space to permit MESA to meet (plus room tax of 14.85%) under one roof. There is no need to use a convention center, ALERT: Hotel Booking Scams which helps to hold down costs. Many cities don't offer that, but Denver does. When the MESA has learned that a housing company or wholesaler hotel was sold to its current NOT affiliated with MESA has been contacting attendees to owners and branded a Sheraton book hotel rooms for the 2012 annual meeting. These compa- in 2008, it underwent a $70 nies may actually put people at risk for credit card and iden- million renovation that was tity theft. We do not recommend doing business with them. completed in November 2009. All housing for the MESA 2012 annual meeting is handled 16th Street Mall It looks marvelous! directly by the Sheraton’s Group Reservations Department. A MESA 2012: 200+ sessions complemented by a four-day link to the Sheraton reservation page for MESA attendees is film festival and bustling book bazaar, all happening in the listed above. For further information, please go to mesana.org, middle of the country, sort of. See you in November. click on the annual meeting logo, and then on hotel. Registration Book Bazaar To preregister for the MESA 2012 annual meeting, complete the registration form We are calling it a Book Bazaar, as this year's located on the back page of this program and return it along with payment to the MESA exhibit is located in an open area adjacent Secretariat. If paying by credit card save a stamp and register online via MESA’s website. to registration and meeting rooms. Arguably Pre-registration is recommended as onsite registration rates are higher. The preregistration the largest display of Middle East studies deadline is October 15, 2012. titles anywhere, MESA’s annual book bazaar will include old and new friends–university Category Preregistration Onsite presses, small publishing houses, indepen- dent book sellers, and even artisans shar- full/associate $110 $130 ing their talents. All will gather in Denver student member $70 $90 for a three plus-day festival of books. The student non-member $90 $110 book bazaar will be open 3:30-7:30pm Other non-members $140 $160 on Saturday (Nov. 17), 9-6 Sunday and Monday (Nov. 18-19) and 8-12 on Tuesday (Nov. 20). Visit MESA’s website for a list of exhibitors. Travel/Ground Transportation You don’t have to rent space to exhibit at the MESA meeting. For $40 per title, publi- The Denver International Airport (DIA) is a hub for three airlines: United, Southwest, and cations can be placed on view in MESA’s Frontier. The airport is 30-45 minutes from the downtown. For ground transportation, Cooperative Book Display. This is an ideal MESA has teamed up with SuperShuttle. Roundtrip shared van service is $38 (or $22 each arrangement for individuals, independent way). Taxi services on Yellow Cab will cost $51 each way, with a $3.50 gate fee from the authors, and small presses with few Middle airport. East studies titles. Reservations can be made by calling SuperShuttle at 1-800-258-3826 (group code: MESA1) If you would like additional information about or going to https://www.supershuttle.com/default.aspx?GS=MESA1. exhibiting at MESA 2012, please visit MESA’s website or contact Shirley Nellson at snell- [email protected] or 520-626-7133. Roommates The Scoop on Thematic Conversations and Roundtables If you are interested in sharing a room at the Thematic Conversations offer an alternative place to pose new questions for research, Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel during explore new trends and approaches to old questions, meet like-minded scholars, and engage the MESA annual meeting, please visit in open academic exchange in an unstructured space. The conversations have a session MESA’s website at http://mesa.arizona.edu/ leader and discussants who set the agenda for the conversation. They are (un)structured annual-meeting/roommates.html. MESA to provide for maximum participation from those in attendance, and there are no formal maintains a “roommates wanted” page on its presentations. Seating is limited to 30 people. website where those wanting to share rooms can find each other. Roundtables promote informed discussion and debate concerning the current state of scholarship in particular fields, work currently in progress or the particular problems Child Care involved in the employment of new approaches, new models, etc. The roundtable format lends itself to open discussion in an atmosphere where participants provide their points of view and engage the audience in active discussion. Participants do not prepare papers and MESA can help parents find a local provider do not lecture to the audience. Seating is restricted to 25-30 maximum. and will reimburse half of the cost of day care services up to a maximum of $200 for the conference. Upon request, the Secretariat will be happy to post contact information of parents who want to share sitting services Panel Chairs Invited during the meeting. For further information, please contact Shirley Nellson at snellson@ Volunteers are invited to chair non-preorganized panels at the MESA 2012 annual meeting. email.arizona.edu or 520 626-7133. For a list of available panels, please visit MESA’s website at mesana.org, click on the 2012 logo, and then on “panel chairs.” Email your choices to Mark Lowder at mlowder@email. arizona.edu. Before you volunteer, please note that MESA membership and annual meeting pre-regis- tration are required of all meeting participants. Page 2 u MESA 2012 Preliminary Program MESA Members Meeting Monday, November 19 v 1:00pm-2:30pm v Sheraton Denver Downtown Hotel, Room TBA The members meeting is an annual meeting of the membership open to all members Sample Agenda and guests. Voting is restricted to full and student MESA members. The meeting mainly consists of reports (see agenda at right). Where members play an important role is in voting for the Nominating Committee and on any resolutions that are being presented. I. Call to Order A member in good standing can add names to the list of people who will be invited to II. Report of the Executive Director run for the Nominating Committee, to augment those proposed by MESA’s Board. III. In Memoriam and Moment of Silence IV. 2012 Election of Officers Results Quorum V. Nominating Committee Vote and Call for A minimum of 35 voting-eligible members must be in attendance for votes to be taken. Names Failing that, the meeting can be held but votes cannot be taken. VI. IJMES Report VII. RoMES Report Resolutions VIII. Committee on Academic Freedom Report When important issues are before the membership, resolutions are sometimes presented IX. Unfinished Business (if tabled from last at the business meeting. Resolutions can originate from MESA’s Board or from the meeting) membership. For resolutions to be acted upon at the 2012 Members Meeting, they X. New Business must be in the hands of the MESA Secretariat by October 21, 2012. Instructions for XI. Adjournment submitting resolutions can be found in MESA’s Bylaws which are posted on MESA’s website at mesana.org. Tools for Paper Presenters Upload Your Paper to myMESA by Oct. 15 Planning for Your Presentation Please upload a copy of your paper to the myMESA system so that The best way to combat nerves is to be prepared. Remember, the your co-panelists, especially the chair/discussant, will have access people in the audience are there because they want to hear what you to it. No one else will be able to view your paper except for your have to say. Prepare a summary of your paper for your presentation, co-panelists. Papers need not be the final copy; drafts are fine. There which should last for no more than 20 minutes. Typically, 10-12 is no suggested paper length. Your topic and your depth of coverage double-spaced typed pages will take 20 minutes to read.
Recommended publications
  • Hastings (Fall 2010) Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association
    UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Hastings Alumni Publications 9-1-2010 Hastings (Fall 2010) Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/alumni_mag Recommended Citation Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association, "Hastings (Fall 2010)" (2010). Hastings Alumni Publications. 129. http://repository.uchastings.edu/alumni_mag/129 This is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Alumni Publications by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. CONTENTS Briefings 02 FROM THE DEAN 03 FOR THE RECORD Victoria Smith '10 recently hit the jackpot on Wheel of Fortune-just in time to start repaying those student loans. 04 I SIDEBARS News and notes from the Hastings community, including a top honor for Professor Karen Musalo; an update on the Lawrence M. Nagin '65 Faculty Enrichment Fund; Professor Joan C. Williams's new study on work-family conflict; and more. In Depth 10 I TRIBUTE In honor of California Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter '66 and his wife, Jane Baxter, the couple's family has made a major gift to fund Hastings' new Appellate Law Center. 12 I LEADERSHIP New Chancellor & Dean Frank H. Wu shares his vision for transforming UC Hastings. 34 I STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS Students acquire valuable trial experience in Hastings' renowned Criminal Practice Clinic. 56 I CLOSING STATEMENT Maureen Corcoran '79 shares her thoughts on the evolving field of health law. Movers & Shakers ALUMNI IN ACTION They have defended accused Hollywood murderers and corporate embezzlers; they have prosecuted scammers, racketeers and price fixers .
    [Show full text]
  • Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L
    Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 1-1-2016 Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L. Anderson Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Housing Law Commons Recommended Citation Courtney L. Anderson, Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate, 13 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 1 (2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL VOLUME XIII NO. 1 WINTER 2016 ARTICLES INTEGRATE AND REACTIVATE THE 1968 FAIR HOUSING MANDATE Courtney L. Anderson LA GRAN LUCHA: LATINA AND LATINO LAWYERS, BREAKING THE LAW ON PRINCIPLE, AND CONFRONTING THE RISKS OF REPRESENTATION Marc‐Tizoc González THE OBERGEFELL MARRIAGE EQUALITY DECISION, WITH ITS EMPHASIS ON HUMAN DIGNITY, AND A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FOOD SECURITY Maxine D. Goodman NOTE POLICE TERROR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION Allyssa Villanueva University of California Hastings College of the Law 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL Winter 2016 Volume 13, Issue 1 Mission Statement The Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal is committed to promoting and inspiring discourse in the legal community regarding issues of race, poverty, social justice, and the law. This Journal is committed to addressing disparities in the legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace and the Political Imperative of Legal Reform in Palestine George E
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 31 | Issue 2 1999 Peace and the Political Imperative of Legal Reform in Palestine George E. Bisharat Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation George E. Bisharat, Peace and the Political Imperative of Legal Reform in Palestine, 31 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 253 (1999) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol31/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. SYMPOSIUM: THE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE AND THE POLITICAL IMPERATIVE OF LEGAL REFORM IN PALESTINE* George E. Bisharat I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 254 II. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 256 III. PROBLEMS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE WEST BANK AND GAZA STRIP ................................................................... 262 A. Absence'of Legal Unity ................................................................. 262 B. Confused and Antiquated Laws ...................................................... 263 C. W eakened Judiciaries ....................................................................266
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinians; from Village Peasants to Camp Refugees: Analogies and Disparities in the Social Use of Space
    Palestinians; From Village Peasants to Camp Refugees: Analogies and Disparities in the Social Use of Space Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Maraqa, Hania Nabil Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 06:50:44 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/190208 PALESTINIANS; FROM VILLAGE PEASANTS TO CAMP REFUGEES: ANALOGIES AND DISPARITIES IN THE SOCIAL USE OF SPACE by Hania Nabil Maraqa _____________________ Copyright © Hania Nabil Maraqa 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 4 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to all those who made this research a reality. Special appreciation goes to my advisor, Dennis Doxtater, who generously showed endless support and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Chapter 1
    Notes Introduction 1. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. (Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1970). 2. Ralph Pettman, Human Behavior and World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1975); Giandomenico Majone, Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989), 275– 76. 3. Bernard Lewis, “The Return of Islam,” Commentary, January 1976; Ofira Seliktar, The Politics of Intelligence and American Wars with Iraq (New York: Palgrave Mac- millan, 2008), 4. 4. Martin Kramer, Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in Amer- ica (Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2000). 5. Bernard Lewis, “The Roots of Muslim Rage,” Atlantic Monthly, September, 1990; Samuel P. Huntington, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs 72 (1993): 24– 49; Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996). Chapter 1 1. Quoted in Joshua Muravchik, The Uncertain Crusade: Jimmy Carter and the Dilemma of Human Rights (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press, 1986), 11– 12, 114– 15, 133, 138– 39; Hedley Donovan, Roosevelt to Reagan: A Reporter’s Encounter with Nine Presidents (New York: Harper & Row, 1985), 165. 2. Charles D. Ameringer, U.S. Foreign Intelligence: The Secret Side of American History (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1990), 357; Peter Meyer, James Earl Carter: The Man and the Myth (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978), 18; Michael A. Turner, “Issues in Evaluating U.S. Intelligence,” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 5 (1991): 275– 86. 3. Abram Shulsky, Silent Warfare: Understanding the World’s Intelligence (Washington, DC: Brassey’s [US], 1993), 169; Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Isratin: the One-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
    Isratin: The One-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Ken-Ben Chao War in the 20th Century Mr. John Bickel January 6, 2011 An anxious crowd of two hundred and fifty people gathered and waited outside the Tel Aviv Museum on May 14, 1948. Within the next thirty-two minutes, the State of Israel was formally established. After nearly two millennia in exile, the Jewish homeland was reborn. The next day, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq attacked Israel, prompting the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Within the next sixty years, several other wars would be fought over the Israeli-Palestinian question. Today, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, or Arab-Israeli Conflict, remains a critical obstacle to world peace and stability in the Middle East. Though peace talks have been in progress for decades, numerous issues continue to obstruct success in the negotiations. If a viable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is not created and implemented, the conflict will continue to plague the region with terrorism and war. Despite many proposed solutions, obstacles such as Jerusalem, the Israeli settlements, and Palestinian terrorism impede significant progress in the peace talks. With the numerous issues regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the best solution is a gradual reintegration of Palestinians into the Holy Land, a relaxation of tensions between the various factions, and the beginning of serious negotiations towards an eventual one-state solution. History In order to fully comprehend the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, an understanding of the region’s bloody history must first be attained. The origin of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict goes as far back as the Biblical era.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Needs the Conference of Presidents?
    MAY 1993 PUBLISHED BY AMERICANS FOR A SAFE ISRAEL Conference is even more fraught with danger because its WHO NEEDS THE positions are more extreme than those of the AJC. Peace Now calls for talks with the PLO, endorses Palestinian CONFERENCE OF statehood, and refuses to support Israeli sovereignty over PRESIDENTS? all of Jerusalem. Its president, Gail Pressberg, spent 14 years working for two pro-PLO organizations, and its co- Herbert Zweibon chair, Letty Pogrebin, has justified Arab rock-throwing. Numerous Peace Now board members also served in Shortly before the recent vote on whether or not leadership positions of radical groups like the Jewish to admit Americans for Peace Now to the Conference of Peace Lobby and the New Jewish Agenda. From now on, Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Conference of Presidents will not able to issue any Rabbi Joseph Glaser, chairman of the Conference's resolution that does not suit Peace Now's extremist tastes. Committee on Scope and Structure, publicly warned that Whether the Conference of Presidents ever really the admission of Peace Now, with its narrow political represented American Jewry is debatable, since the lead- agenda and ruthless tactics, would "hobble and under- ers of its member-organizations are not democratically cut the purposes for which the Conference was estab- elected. The fact that Peace Now was admitted in contra- lished." Rabbi Glaser subsequently resigned from that vention of several of the Conference's own by-laws (which committee in protest over irregularities in the conduct of is what prompted Rabbi Glaser's resignation) is further the Peace Now admissions process, Peace Now was testimony to the absence of democracy and fair play admitted and it seems that the Conference of Presidents among the Conference's top brass.
    [Show full text]
  • Boycotting Israeli Apartheid: Practical and Ethical Questions
    Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History Volume 10 Issue 1 Illawarra Unity Article 3 2010 Boycotting Israeli apartheid: practical and ethical questions George Bisharat University of California Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/unity Recommended Citation Bisharat, George, Boycotting Israeli apartheid: practical and ethical questions, Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History, 10(1), 2010, 23-36. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/unity/vol10/iss1/3 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Boycotting Israeli apartheid: practical and ethical questions Abstract George Bisharat is Professor of Law at the University of California’s Hasting College of the Law in San Francisco. He is the author of amongst other things, Palestinian Lawyers and Israeli Rule: Law and Disorder in the West Bank. Professor Bisharat was brought to Australia by the Coalition for Justice and Peace in Palestine. This address, delivered on May 13, 2010, was sponsored by the School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong. This journal article is available in Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History: https://ro.uow.edu.au/unity/vol10/iss1/3 Boycotting Israeli Apartheid: Practical and Ethical Questions George Bisharat George Bisharat is Professor of Law at the University of California’s Hasting College of the Law in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Home in Jerusalem: Partitions, Parks, and Planning Futures
    THE POLITICS OF HOME IN JERUSALEM: PARTITIONS, PARKS, AND PLANNING FUTURES Nathan W. Swanson A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Geography. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Banu Gökarıksel Sara Smith John Pickles Sarah Shields Nadia Yaqub © 2016 Nathan W. Swanson ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Nathan W. Swanson: The Politics of Home in Jerusalem: Partitions, Parks, and Planning Futures (Under the direction of Banu Gökarıksel) At a time when Palestine and Palestinians are ubiquitously framed through the “Israeli- Palestinian conflict” and the “peace process”, the spaces of everyday life for Palestinians are often ignored. This is in spite of the fact that so many of the Israeli policies and technologies of occupation and settlement are experienced materially by Palestinians in these spaces. In this dissertation, then, drawing on feminist geopolitics, I consider everyday Palestinian spaces like the home, neighborhood, and village—with a focus on Jerusalem—to better understand geographies of occupation and settlement in Palestine/Israel today. I argue, through attention to Palestinian experiences on the ground, that widespread representations of Jerusalem as either a “united” or “divided” city fail to capture the Palestinian experience, which is actually one of fragmentation, both physical and social. As a case study in fragmentation, I turn to the zoning of Israeli national parks in and between Palestinian neighborhoods, arguing that parks have served the purposes of settlement in less politicized ways than West Bank settlement blocs, but like the settlement blocs, have resulted in dispossession and restrictions on Palestinian construction, expansion, and movement.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of a Viable Option Evaluating Outcomes to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    Policy Report In Search of a Viable Option Evaluating Outcomes to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict A report by Dr. Shira Efron and Evan Gottesman, with a foreword by Ambassador Daniel B. Shapiro Is the two-state solution still possible? Are other frameworks better or more feasible than two states? This study seeks to answer these questions through a candid and rigorous analysis. Is there another viable outcome? While the two-state model deserves to be debated on its merits, and certainly on its viability, pronouncements of this formula’s death raise the question: if not two states, then what? About the Study The two-state solution has been widely criticized from the right and the left as an idea whose time has passed and been overtaken by facts on the ground. As a result, many other models for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have been advanced, from one-state formulas to confederation outcomes to maintaining the status quo indefinitely. How do these proposals for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — including the recently released Trump plan — measure up against key criteria, like keeping Israel Jewish and democratic, providing security, and ensuring feasibility? Is there a model that fits the needs of both parties while being realistic in practice? This comprehensive study of potential outcomes for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict assesses the strengths and weaknesses of different plans, and trains a critical eye on whether a two-state solution is still possible, concluding that despite the heavy lift it will take to implement, a two-state outcome is not only possible but the only implementable plan that maintains Israel as Jewish and democratic.
    [Show full text]
  • Israelâ•Žs Illegal Attack on the Gaza Flotilla
    UC Berkeley Berkeley Journal of Middle Eastern & Islamic Law Title Freedom Thwarted: Israel’s Illegal Attack on the Gaza Flotilla Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gn4c6h8 Journal Berkeley Journal of Middle Eastern & Islamic Law, 4(1) Authors Bisharat, George E. James, Carey Publication Date 2011-04-01 DOI 10.15779/Z38X59Z Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California BISHARAT MACRO 11-15-2012 (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2012 3:43 PM Freedom Thwarted: Israel’s Illegal Attack on the Gaza Flotilla George Bisharat Carey James Rose Mishaan* INTRODUCTION In the early morning hours of May 31, 2010, Israeli paratroopers de- scended by ropes from hovering helicopters to the deck of the Mavi Marmara, sailing through the black waves of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. The ship was the largest of six comprising the “Gaza Freedom Flo- tilla” that had departed some days earlier from a rendezvous point near Turkey for the Gaza Strip. Flotilla organizers hoped their attempt to de- liver humanitarian goods to Gaza Palestinians would draw publicity to Israel’s siege of the Gaza Strip, and would highlight the claimed inhu- manity and illegality of that policy. A melee ensued, in which nine civil- ian ship passengers were killed and numerous others—both ship passen- gers and Israeli soldiers—were wounded. Controversy immediately erupted over the propriety and legality of Israel’s actions. Israel steadfastly maintains that the raid on the ship was legitimate. It further maintains that its soldiers, who allegedly faced provocation by the Mavi Marmara’s passengers,1 acted in self-defense and in compli- * George Bisharat is a Professor at UC Hastings College of the Law, where he teaches criminal procedure, criminal practice, anthropology of law, and Islamic Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of International Law in Palestinian-Israeli Peace Talks
    Article Shadow or Shade? The Roles of International Law in Palestinian-Israeli Peace Talks Omar M. Dajanit I. INTRO D UCT IO N 6.............................................................................................................................62 I1. THE FUNCTIONS OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL PEACE NEGOTIATIONS: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY T HEORETICAL FRAM EW ORK .......................................................................................................... 65 A. The Functions of Legal Rules in Private Ordering....................................................... 66 B. InternationalBargaining: Analogies and Contrasts.................................................... 70 1. A nalog ies............................................................................................................... 7 1 2 . C on trasts............................................................................................................... 74 a. Indeterminacy of InternationalNorms ..................................................75 b. Lack of InternationalAdjudicative and Enforcement Mechanisms ..........77 3. The Shade of the Law ............................................................................................8I 1II. BARGAINING AT THE SHADOW'S EDGE: LEGAL DISCOURSE DURING PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI PERMANENT STATUS N EGOTIATIONS .........................................................................................83 A . The "'Agreed" Legal Framework.................................................................................. 84
    [Show full text]