Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L Georgia State University College of Law Reading Room Faculty Publications By Year Faculty Publications 1-1-2016 Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate Courtney L. Anderson Georgia State University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/faculty_pub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Housing Law Commons Recommended Citation Courtney L. Anderson, Integrate and Reactivate the 1968 Fair Housing Mandate, 13 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 1 (2016) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Reading Room. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications By Year by an authorized administrator of Reading Room. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL VOLUME XIII NO. 1 WINTER 2016 ARTICLES INTEGRATE AND REACTIVATE THE 1968 FAIR HOUSING MANDATE Courtney L. Anderson LA GRAN LUCHA: LATINA AND LATINO LAWYERS, BREAKING THE LAW ON PRINCIPLE, AND CONFRONTING THE RISKS OF REPRESENTATION Marc‐Tizoc González THE OBERGEFELL MARRIAGE EQUALITY DECISION, WITH ITS EMPHASIS ON HUMAN DIGNITY, AND A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO FOOD SECURITY Maxine D. Goodman NOTE POLICE TERROR AND OFFICER INDEMNIFICATION Allyssa Villanueva University of California Hastings College of the Law 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102 HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL Winter 2016 Volume 13, Issue 1 Mission Statement The Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal is committed to promoting and inspiring discourse in the legal community regarding issues of race, poverty, social justice, and the law. This Journal is committed to addressing disparities in the legal system. We will create an avenue for compelling dialogue on the subject of the growing marginalization of racial minorities and the economically disadvantaged. It is our hope that the legal theories addressed in this Journal will prove useful in remedying the structural inequalities facing our communities. HASTINGS RACE AND POVERTY LAW JOURNAL EDITORIAL STAFF 2015‐2016 EDITORIAL BOARD LILIANA GARCIA & RODNEY K. NICKENS, JR. ....................................................................................... Co‐Editors‐in‐Chief STACY KOWALSKI ............................................................................................................................ Executive Articles Editor DOROTHY YOUNG ............................................................................................................................. Senior Managing Editor NANCY AREVALO ................................................................................................................................. Senior Articles Editor DAVID HERNANDEZ ............................................................................................................................. Senior Articles Editor NATALIE KOSKI‐KARELL ...................................................................................................................... Senior Articles Editor ARIONNA LAWSON ............................................................................................................................... Senior Articles Editor ALEXANDER LUONG ............................................................................................................................. Senior Articles Editor DESTINY WHITFIELD ............................................................................................................................. Senior Articles Editor ZACHARY NEWMAN ................................................................................................................................. Senior Notes Editor ALLYSSA VILLANUEVA .............................................................................................................................. Symposium Editor WHITNEY GEITZ ........................................................................................................................ Community Outreach Editor EVELINA CHANG ............................................................................................................................... Communications Editor SHIVA RUPAL SHAH ....................................................................................................... Acquisitions & Submissions Editor SOHIR ALBGAL ............................................................................................................................................ Production Editor BRITTANEY DE LA TORRE .......................................................................................................................... Production Editor MIRA KARAGEORGE .............................................................................................................. Finance & Development Editor STAFF EDITORS PIPER AKOL INGA ORBELI KRISTINA ROSALES LILIT TER‐ASTVATSATRYAN JACOB BOTHAMLEY CHRISTINE REYES LOYA ARNULFO SANCHEZ CHRISTOPHER GUECO GABRIELLA RODEZNO SONALI SHAIKHER TOM MCCARTHY ................................................................................... Director, O’Brien Center for Scholarly Publications FACULTY ADVISORS GEORGE BISHARAT, Professor of Law, Emeritus RICHARD A. BOSWELL, Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Global Programs MARSHA N. COHEN, Honorary Raymond L. Sullivan Professor of Law JOHN L. DIAMOND, Professor of Law MIYE GOISHI, Clinical Professor of Law and Director of the Civil Justice Clinic BRIAN E. GRAY, Professor of Law, Emeritus DAVID JUNG, Professor of Law, Emeritus CHARLES L. KNAPP, Joseph W. Cotchett Distinguished Professor of Law, Emeritus JOHN LESHY, Harry D. Sunderland Distinguished Professor of Real Property Law, Emeritus RORY LITTLE, Professor of Law SHAUNA I. MARSHALL, Professor of Law, Emeritus UGO MATTEI, Distinguished Professor of Law and Fromm Chair in International & Comparative Law KAREN MUSALO, Clinical Professor of Law, Director of Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, and Director of the Refugee & Human Rights Clinic ASCANIO PIOMELLI, Professor of Law HARRY G. PRINCE, Professor of Law DONNA M. RYU, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of California MARGARET RUSSELL, Professor of Law, Santa Clara University School of Law REUEL SCHILLER, Professor of Law NANCY STUART, Clinical Professor of Law and Director of Externships & Pro Bono Programs The Hastings Race and Poverty Law Journal (ISSN: 1546-4652) is published Winter and Summer online by the students of UC Hastings College of the Law. The mailing address for the HRPLJ is 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102-4978. Telephone number: (415) 581-8953. Fax number: (415) 581-8934.Web site: http://www.uchastings.edu/hrplj/index.html. Email address: [email protected]. Back issues and single issues are available from the O’Brien Center for Scholarly Publications, UC Hastings College of the Law, 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102-4978. Citations generally conform to the rules of A Uniform System of Citation, The Bluebook (20th ed., 2015) copyright by the Columbia, Harvard and University of Pennsyvania Law Reviews and the Yale Law Journal. HRPLJ gladly considers unsolicited manuscripts for publication. HRPLJ welcomes both formal and informal responses to articles appearing in HRPLJ. Articles must be single-spaced, printed double-sided on 8.5” x 11” paper (if mailed), with footnotes in the body of the manuscript. HRPLJ prefers submissions by email to [email protected]. © Copyright University of California Hastings College of the Law HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW DIRECTORS THOMAS GEDE, B.A., J.D., Chair ......................................................................................................... Davis CARL W. “CHIP” ROBERTSON, B.A., M.B.A., J.D., Vice Chair ................................................... Los Angeles DONALD BRADLEY, B.A., J.D., LL.M. .......................................................................................... Pleasanton TINA COMBS, B.A., J.D. .................................................................................................................. Oakland MAUREEN E. CORCORAN, B.A., M.A., J.D. ............................................................................ San Francisco MARCI DRAGUN, B.A., J.D. ........................................................................................................ Burlingame CARIN T. FUJISAKI, B.A., J.D. ................................................................................................... Walnut Creek CLAES H. LEWENHAUPT, B.A., LL.M., J.D.* .................................................................................. Fort Irwin MARY NOEL PEPYS, B.A., J.D. .............................................................................................. San Francisco BRUCE L. SIMON, A.B., J.D. ......................................................................................................Hillsborough SANDI THOMPSON, B.A., J.D. ........................................................................................................... Woodside *Great-grandson of Hon. Serranus Clinton Hastings, Founder of the College DIRECTORS EMERITI MARVIN R. BAXTER, B.A., J.D. ........................................................................................................... Fresno WILLIAM R. CHANNELL, B.A., J.D., Retired Justice ......................................................................... Lafayette JOSEPH W. C OTCHETT, B.S., LL.B. .............................................................................................Hillsborough
Recommended publications
  • Hastings (Fall 2010) Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association
    UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Hastings Alumni Publications 9-1-2010 Hastings (Fall 2010) Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/alumni_mag Recommended Citation Hastings College of the Law Alumni Association, "Hastings (Fall 2010)" (2010). Hastings Alumni Publications. 129. http://repository.uchastings.edu/alumni_mag/129 This is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Alumni Publications by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. CONTENTS Briefings 02 FROM THE DEAN 03 FOR THE RECORD Victoria Smith '10 recently hit the jackpot on Wheel of Fortune-just in time to start repaying those student loans. 04 I SIDEBARS News and notes from the Hastings community, including a top honor for Professor Karen Musalo; an update on the Lawrence M. Nagin '65 Faculty Enrichment Fund; Professor Joan C. Williams's new study on work-family conflict; and more. In Depth 10 I TRIBUTE In honor of California Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter '66 and his wife, Jane Baxter, the couple's family has made a major gift to fund Hastings' new Appellate Law Center. 12 I LEADERSHIP New Chancellor & Dean Frank H. Wu shares his vision for transforming UC Hastings. 34 I STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS Students acquire valuable trial experience in Hastings' renowned Criminal Practice Clinic. 56 I CLOSING STATEMENT Maureen Corcoran '79 shares her thoughts on the evolving field of health law. Movers & Shakers ALUMNI IN ACTION They have defended accused Hollywood murderers and corporate embezzlers; they have prosecuted scammers, racketeers and price fixers .
    [Show full text]
  • Peace and the Political Imperative of Legal Reform in Palestine George E
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 31 | Issue 2 1999 Peace and the Political Imperative of Legal Reform in Palestine George E. Bisharat Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation George E. Bisharat, Peace and the Political Imperative of Legal Reform in Palestine, 31 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 253 (1999) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol31/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. SYMPOSIUM: THE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS OF PEACE AND PROSPERITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE AND THE POLITICAL IMPERATIVE OF LEGAL REFORM IN PALESTINE* George E. Bisharat I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 254 II. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 256 III. PROBLEMS IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN THE WEST BANK AND GAZA STRIP ................................................................... 262 A. Absence'of Legal Unity ................................................................. 262 B. Confused and Antiquated Laws ...................................................... 263 C. W eakened Judiciaries ....................................................................266
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus June 2019 Dem Primary
    Democratic Dividing Lines Verified Voter Omnibus Survey N=484 Democrats or Democratic leaners June 22 - June 25, 2019 !X!1 Key Findings • Biden’s lead among 24 announced Democratic candidates has narrowed by 6-points since May to 32% of the Democratic vote. • Biden’s 6-point drop came with a concurrent 6-point gain by Elizabeth Warren to 11% of the Democratic vote, or 4- points behind Bernie Sanders who takes 15% of the Democratic vote. • Biden continues to lead both Sanders and Warren in head to head match-ups, but his lead has narrowed to 30-points from both Sanders and Warren, down from 36-points ahead of Sanders and 47-points ahead of Warren in May. • 73% of Democrats plan to watch the debates, or coverage of the debates. Ahead of the kickoff of tonight’s debates, we tested Democratic concern about two recent pieces of news about Biden — his flip flopping on the Hyde Amendment’s impact on access to abortion, and past associations with segregationists. • We found the Hyde Amendment resonates more strongly with Democratic voters, with 39% of Democrats concerned about Biden’s stance on the Hyde Amendment, and 22% concerned about his associations with segregationists. • Particularly concerned are women, African Americans, younger voters, and more educated voters. !2 Methodology • Using a voter file-matched online panel, we surveyed n=1,006 registered voters across the country from June 22 to June 25, 2019, with a sample of 484 Democrats or Democratic-leaning Independents. • With our third monthly tracking survey of 2019, we were able to confirm the voting history of participants and track changes in the attitudes and behaviors of key 2020 voters since our last survey of verified Democratic or Democratic-leaning Independent voters from May 20 to May 21, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestinians; from Village Peasants to Camp Refugees: Analogies and Disparities in the Social Use of Space
    Palestinians; From Village Peasants to Camp Refugees: Analogies and Disparities in the Social Use of Space Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Maraqa, Hania Nabil Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 06:50:44 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/190208 PALESTINIANS; FROM VILLAGE PEASANTS TO CAMP REFUGEES: ANALOGIES AND DISPARITIES IN THE SOCIAL USE OF SPACE by Hania Nabil Maraqa _____________________ Copyright © Hania Nabil Maraqa 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2 0 0 4 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to all those who made this research a reality. Special appreciation goes to my advisor, Dennis Doxtater, who generously showed endless support and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Is Only Leading Dem to Top Trump in Ohio, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Former V.P
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 BIDEN IS ONLY LEADING DEM TO TOP TRUMP IN OHIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; FORMER V.P. HAS BIG LEAD IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Former Vice President Joseph Biden leads President Donald Trump 50 – 42 percent in the critical swing state of Ohio, the only leading Democratic candidate to top the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The other leading Democratic contenders each are locked in a dead heat with President Trump, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll finds: 46 percent for Trump to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with 45 percent; Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and California Sen. Kamala Harris; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; 44 percent for Trump to 43 percent for New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Women, black voters and independent voters give Biden his lead in the matchup with Trump. Biden leads 53 – 40 percent among women, as men are split with 46 percent for Biden and 45 percent for Trump. White voters are divided, with 48 percent for Trump and 45 percent for Biden. Black voters go Democratic 84 – 8 percent. Independent voters go to Biden 55 – 32 percent. Republicans back Trump 86 – 10 percent as Biden leads 96 – 2 percent among Democrats. “Former Vice President Joseph Biden calls himself a blue-collar guy. With Ohio certainly a blue-collar state, it is no surprise he is the Democrat who runs best against President Donald Trump and is solidly ahead in the Democratic primary in the Buckeye State,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • April 23, 2019 April Omni B Survey, Data for Progress Items
    To: Data for Progress From: YouGov Blue Date: April 23, 2019 April Omni B survey, Data for Progress Items [primaryvote] Next year, there will be a presidential $state_election_text in [state] to select nominees for president for the Democratic and Republican parties. Will you... <1> Definitely [vote or participate] <2> Probably [vote or participate] <3> Maybe [vote or participate] <4> Probably not [vote or participate] <5> Definitely not [vote or participate] [partyvote] And if you were to [vote or participate], would you [vote or participate] in the... <1> Democratic [primary or caucus] <2> Republican [primary or caucus] <3 fixed> Not sure [CHOICE20] Thinking about the 2020 Democratic presidential [primary or caucus] in your state, which candidate or candidates are you considering voting for? Select all that apply. <1> Joe Biden <2> Bernie Sanders <3> Kamala Harris <4> Beto O’Rourke <5> Cory Booker <6> Amy Klobuchar <7> Elizabeth Warren <8> John Hickenlooper <9> Kirsten Gillibrand <10> John Delaney <11> Julián Castro <12> Stacey Abrams <13> Tammy Baldwin <14> Bill DeBlasio <15> Tulsi Gabbard <16> Pete Buttigieg <17> Jay Inslee <18> Tim Ryan <19> Seth Moulton <20> Eric Swalwell <21> Andrew Yang <22> Marianne Williamson <23> Mike Gravel <24> Steve Bullock <25> Michael Bennet <26> Wayne Messam <27 fixed> None of these [RANK20] And of those candidates, please ranK them from the candidate you most prefer to the candidate you would least prefer. <1 (if selected in CHOICE20)> Joe Biden <2 (if selected in CHOICE20)> > Bernie Sanders <3 (if selected
    [Show full text]
  • Isratin: the One-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian
    Isratin: The One-State Solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Ken-Ben Chao War in the 20th Century Mr. John Bickel January 6, 2011 An anxious crowd of two hundred and fifty people gathered and waited outside the Tel Aviv Museum on May 14, 1948. Within the next thirty-two minutes, the State of Israel was formally established. After nearly two millennia in exile, the Jewish homeland was reborn. The next day, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq attacked Israel, prompting the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Within the next sixty years, several other wars would be fought over the Israeli-Palestinian question. Today, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, or Arab-Israeli Conflict, remains a critical obstacle to world peace and stability in the Middle East. Though peace talks have been in progress for decades, numerous issues continue to obstruct success in the negotiations. If a viable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is not created and implemented, the conflict will continue to plague the region with terrorism and war. Despite many proposed solutions, obstacles such as Jerusalem, the Israeli settlements, and Palestinian terrorism impede significant progress in the peace talks. With the numerous issues regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the best solution is a gradual reintegration of Palestinians into the Holy Land, a relaxation of tensions between the various factions, and the beginning of serious negotiations towards an eventual one-state solution. History In order to fully comprehend the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, an understanding of the region’s bloody history must first be attained. The origin of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict goes as far back as the Biblical era.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Results Report Presidential Primary Election March 3, 2020
    Summary Results Report Official Canvas Presidential Primary Election March 3, 2020 Alpine County Supervisorial District 1 STATISTICS TOTAL Registered Voters - Total 155 Registered Voters - Democratic Party 67 Registered Voters - Republican Party 43 Registered Voters - American Independent Party 6 Registered Voters - Green Party 4 Registered Voters - Libertarian Party 3 Registered Voters - Peace and Freedom Party 0 Registered Voters - NONPARTISAN 32 Ballots Cast - Total 99 Ballots Cast - Democratic Party 58 Ballots Cast - Republican Party 25 Ballots Cast - American Independent Party 4 Ballots Cast - Green Party 2 Ballots Cast - Libertarian Party 1 Ballots Cast - Peace and Freedom Party 0 Ballots Cast - NONPARTISAN 9 Ballots Cast - Blank 0 63.87% Voter Turnout - Total 86.57% Voter Turnout - Democratic Party 58.14% Voter Turnout - Republican Party 66.67% Voter Turnout - American Independent Party 50.00% Voter Turnout - Green Party 33.33% Voter Turnout - Libertarian Party 0.00% Voter Turnout - Peace and Freedom Party 28.12% Voter Turnout - NONPARTISAN DEM Presidential Preference Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE % Precinct Summary - 03/25/2020 2:06 PM Page 1 of 8 Report generated with Electionware Copyright © 2007-2019 Summary Results Report Official Canvas Presidential Primary Election March 3, 2020 Alpine County Supervisorial District 1 DEM Presidential Preference Vote For 1 TOTAL VOTE % ANDREW YANG 0 0.00% ROQUE "ROCKY" DE LA FUENTE III 0 0.00% JOHN K. DELANEY 0 0.00% AMY KLOBUCHAR 4 6.90% BERNIE SANDERS 9 15.52% JOE SESTAK 0 0.00% TOM STEYER 1 1.72% DEVAL PATRICK 0 0.00% MICHAEL BENNET 0 0.00% MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG 3 5.17% MOSIE BOYD 0 0.00% CORY BOOKER 0 0.00% PETE BUTTIGIEG 4 6.90% JOSEPH R.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University/Boston Globe
    SUPRC/Boston Globe August 2019 FINAL NH DEM PRIMARY AUGUST Region: (N=500) n % West/North ------------------------------------------------------- 131 26.20 Central ------------------------------------------------------------ 127 25.40 Hillsborough ------------------------------------------------------ 137 27.40 Rockingham ------------------------------------------------------ 105 21.00 INTRO SECTION> Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk (SUFF-ick) University and I would like to get your opinions on some questions about the upcoming Democratic Primary in New Hampshire. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some brief questions? (quota) A. Are you a resident of New Hampshire? (N=500) n % Yes ----------------------------------------------------------------- 500 100.00 1. Gender (N=500) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 224 44.80 Female ------------------------------------------------------------ 276 55.20 2. Thinking about the Democratic Primary for President coming up in six months, how likely are you to vote in the Democratic Primary – would you say you are very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely, or not at all likely to vote in the Democratic Primary? (N=500) n % Very likely--------------------------------------------------------- 448 89.60 Somewhat likely -------------------------------------------------- 52 10.40 3. Are you currently enrolled as a Democrat, Republican, or Undeclared/Independent? (N=500) n % Democrat ---------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Boycotting Israeli Apartheid: Practical and Ethical Questions
    Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History Volume 10 Issue 1 Illawarra Unity Article 3 2010 Boycotting Israeli apartheid: practical and ethical questions George Bisharat University of California Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/unity Recommended Citation Bisharat, George, Boycotting Israeli apartheid: practical and ethical questions, Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History, 10(1), 2010, 23-36. Available at:https://ro.uow.edu.au/unity/vol10/iss1/3 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Boycotting Israeli apartheid: practical and ethical questions Abstract George Bisharat is Professor of Law at the University of California’s Hasting College of the Law in San Francisco. He is the author of amongst other things, Palestinian Lawyers and Israeli Rule: Law and Disorder in the West Bank. Professor Bisharat was brought to Australia by the Coalition for Justice and Peace in Palestine. This address, delivered on May 13, 2010, was sponsored by the School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong. This journal article is available in Illawarra Unity - Journal of the Illawarra Branch of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History: https://ro.uow.edu.au/unity/vol10/iss1/3 Boycotting Israeli Apartheid: Practical and Ethical Questions George Bisharat George Bisharat is Professor of Law at the University of California’s Hasting College of the Law in San Francisco.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) Do You Plan to Register Before the 2020 Election? #2) How Favorable Are Your Feelings About the Following Public Figures?
    #1) Do you plan to register before the 2020 election? 59 Yes, definitely 41 Yes, probably #2) How favorable are your feelings about the following public figures? None Very Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Very Never favorable favorable unfavorable unfavorable heard of them Nancy 28 30 18 12 10 3 Pelosi Barack 78 14 3 2 2 0 Obama Bill Clinton 29 31 21 10 8 0 Hillary 26 26 17 17 13 1 Clinton Alexandria 35 21 19 8 5 12 Ocasio-Cortez Mark 4 15 41 22 15 3 Zuckerberg Polling was conducted online from July 17 through 20, 2019. Using its Bias Correct Engine to attain a sample reflective of registered voters, Change Research polled 935 people in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. Post-stratification weights were made on age, gender, race, and 2016 vote to reflect the distribution of voters in each state. Each state was weighted equally. Joe Biden 36 33 13 9 9 0 Beto 14 32 26 8 5 15 O'Rourke Pete 31 26 17 3 5 18 Buttigieg Bernie 37 29 16 10 8 0 Sanders Kamala 23 34 24 5 3 11 Harris Elizabeth 37 28 18 8 5 5 Warren Cory 16 30 29 6 4 16 Booker Amy 6 20 33 9 2 30 Klobuchar Julián 6 20 32 6 3 33 Castro John 2 8 42 5 3 41 Delaney Tulsi 4 12 30 9 4 41 Gabbard Kirsten 7 21 38 7 4 23 Gillibrand John 2 9 38 5 3 43 Hickenlooper Jay Inslee 2 9 33 3 2 51 Eric 3 12 33 2 1 48 Swalwell © 2019 Change Research [email protected] | changeresearch.com ​ ​ Andrew 5 14 34 6 1 39 Yang Michael 2 7 35 3 2 51 Bennet Marianne 2 3 31 6 4 54 Williamson Tim Ryan 1 9 35 5 4 46 Bill de 2 12 39 13 7 26 Blasio #3) In the November 2016 election, did you vote for: 83 Hillary Clinton, the Democrat 7 Did not vote 5 Donald Trump, the Republican 3 Gary Johnson, the Libertarian 1 Jill Stein, the Green Party #4) In 2020, do you think you will most likely: 100 Vote in the Democratic primary #5) As you may know, Democratic primary debates will occur on June 26 and 27.
    [Show full text]
  • CNN/SSRS Poll -- December 04, 2019 to December 08, 2019 - Texas TABLE 007 Question P9 P9
    1 Braxton Way Suite 125 Glen Mills, PA 19342 484-840-4300 www.ssrs.com OVERVIEW The study was conducted for CNN via telephone by SSRS, an independent research company. Interviews were conducted from December 4, 2019 to December 8, 2019 among a sample of 1,205 respondents who live in Texas. The landline total respondents were 421 and there were 784 cell phone respondents. The margin of sampling error for total respondents is +/-3.4 at the 95% confidence level. The design effect is 1.46. For results among the 327 respondents who are likely to vote in the Democratic primary the margin of sampling error is +/-6.6 and for results among the 537 respondents who are likely to vote in the Republican primary it is +/-5.0. More information about SSRS can be obtained by visiting www.ssrs.com. Question text noted in parentheses was rotated or randomized. Values less than 0.5 percent are indicated by an asterisk (*). NOTE ABOUT CROSSTABS Interviews were conducted among a representative sample of the adult population, age 18 or older, of Texas. Members of demographic groups not shown in the published crosstabs are represented in the results for each question in the poll. Crosstabs on the pages that follow only include results for subgroups with a minimum n=125 unweighted cases. Results for subgroups with fewer than n=125 unweighted cases are not displayed and instead are denoted with "SN" because samples of that size carry larger margins of sampling error and can be too small to be projectable with confidence to their true values in the population.
    [Show full text]