DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuesday, June 9, 1998

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuesday, June 9, 1998 CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 118A S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, June 9, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7773 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, June 9, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS _______________ [Translation] Prayers _______________ GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS D (1000) Mr. Peter Adams (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, [English] pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government’s response to 20 petitions. POINTS OF ORDER BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE * * * Hon. Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House [English] of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I seek unanimous consent to move: INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS That the Order of the House of June 8, 1998, respecting motions pursuant to Standing Order 57 and 78(3) be rescinded. Hon. Sheila Finestone (Mount Royal, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I The Speaker: The government House leader has asked for have the privilege to table the report of the parliamentary wing of unanimous consent to put a motion. Is there unanimous consent? the United Nations called the Interparliamentary Unions where Some hon. members: Agreed. delegates worked effectively to raise the urgency to commit to the humanitarian clearing of land mines and the removal of same and An hon. member: No. moved to adopt the needed Ottawa convention. [Translation] Therefore, it is my pleasure to table the report of the 99th Mr. René Laurin: What is this about, Mr. Speaker? interparliamentary conference held in Windhoek, Namibia, on April 5 to 11. The Speaker: My colleague asked a question. For his informa- tion, the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons has moved a motion. It reads as follows: * * * [English] COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE That the Order of the House of June 8, 1998, respecting motions pursuant to Standing Order 73 and 78(3) be rescinded. AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD [Translation] The Speaker: Is there unanimous consent? Mr. Joe McGuire (Egmont, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the pleasure and honour to table today, in both official languages, the Some hon. members: Agreed. third report of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri- Some hon. members: No. Food on biotechnology. D (1005) Your committee reviewed the issue of biotechnology as it [English] pertains to agriculture and agri-food. As part of the process of renewing the Canadian biotechnology strategy it came up with a The Speaker: The reason I explained this to the hon. member number of recommendations which are contained in this report. for Joliette was that he wanted to know what the motion was. However, I had already asked for unanimous consent to put this The new Canadian biotechnology strategy involves three depart- motion and I heard a ‘‘no’’ from my left. Therefore, the motion ments: Industry, Health and Agriculture and Agri-Food. With the cannot be put. explosion of genetically modified products, this strategy will have 7774 COMMONS DEBATES June 9, 1998 Routine Proceedings to be an ever-changing one which members of parliament will have D (1015 ) to respond to. The Speaker: The House leader for the Conservative Party The committee is also requesting a comprehensive answer to the makes a very interesting point, as does the opposition House leader. report from the government pursuant to Standing Order 109. I point out to the House that it would be one thing to go with the strict wording of this rule. However a motion was put on February I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the committee 19, 1998 which perhaps went beyond the scope of the wording and members from all sides for their work. I also wish to thank the it went through the House. On December 1, 1997 a motion pursuant committee staff, especially our research co-ordinator, Sonya Dak- to Standing Order 56.1(1) was put and it went through the House. ers, who will be retiring at the end of the month. This happens to be her last major piece of work after 12 years with the agriculture My interpretation of both of those motions is that we cannot pick committee. We all wish her well. and choose on the way through. Those two motions went through before and they seemed to go somewhat beyond the scope of the wording, and at that time no one raised a voice of objection. * * * I am loath to interfere at any time like this. I would rule that because of these other two motions that went through as prece- BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE dents, I will allow this one to go through. I would strongly urge the committee on procedure to perhaps take this up again and to give direction more clearly to the House and the Speaker. I am going to Hon. Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House allow this Standing Order 56.1 to stand. of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 56(1), and having raised the issue earlier today, I move: Mr. Randy White: Mr. Speaker, what happened in this House That the Order of the House of June 8, 1998, respecting motions pursuant to last night was in effect an order of the House. Now we are going to Standing Order 57 and 78(3) be rescinded. get into a discussion of the principles of this House of Commons. It is an order of the House. The government cannot just come in here Mr. Randy White (Langley—Abbotsford, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, and change an order of the House, something which was passed by I understand that the government House leader is trying to put this this whole House. Otherwise all of the issues we deal with here— motion to the floor this morning, but this is the time for routine motions to be put and this is not a routine motion. The Speaker: I made a ruling on this issue. Now the House will have a chance to pronounce itself. D (1010 ) An hon. member: Mr. Speaker, a point of order. Hon. Don Boudria: Mr. Speaker, to assist the Chair, if I may, I The Speaker: Not on this issue. I have made a ruling. know that the opposition House leader has raised the proposition that this was not, in his view, a routine motion. I draw to your The question is on the motion. Will those members who object to attention Standing Order 67(1)(p) which states: the motion please rise in their places. (p) such other motion, made upon Routine Proceedings, as may be required for the The hon. member on a point of order. observance of the properties of the House, the maintenance of its authority, the appointment or conduct of its officers, the management of its business, the arrangement of its proceedings, the correctness of its record, the fixing of its sitting D (1020 ) days or the time of its meetings or adjournment. Mr. Ken Epp: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I point out I think this very well covers the fact that indeed this motion is to your attention Standing Order 67: receivable the way it was presented under Standing Order 56(1). 67.(1) The following motions are debatable: Mr. Peter MacKay (Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, The Speaker: This motion is not debatable. I repeat, will those PC): Mr. Speaker, I am very new to this place and I do not profess members who object to the motion please rise in their places. to be an expert in this, but my understanding is that what happened yesterday was that a substantive motion was passed on the floor of And 25 members having risen: the House and that cannot simply be overturned by a routine motion from the government. There is a procedure that has to be in The Speaker: Because there are 25 members standing in their place. There is notice that has to be given. My understanding is that places, this motion is deemed withdrawn. this cannot happen in the way that the government House leader is trying to put it before the House. (Motion withdrawn) June 9, 1998 COMMONS DEBATES 7775 Routine Proceedings Hon. Don Boudria (Leader of the Government in the House bothering average everyday grassroots Canadians out there like of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order debt, like spending, like taxes, like problems at the immigration 27(1), I move: department, like crime, like where is the national victims bill of rights. For instance where is the bill on drunk driving that was That, commencing June 10, 1998 and concluding June 23, 1998, the hours of sitting be extended to 4 a.m. committed to by this government in May and which was reneged by this government, that was changed apparently to November 30. Mr. Randy White (Langley—Abbotsford, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, Now we understand it is not going to do that either when every I am very pleased actually to debate this motion. Could you tell me, party here in opposition agreed with the government for a change. Mr. Speaker, first of all how much time I have? Now the Liberals say ‘‘We have some things on the agenda’’— An hon. member: As long as you want. not too much on the agenda I might add—‘‘and we cannot have our own way, so you will have to stay until four in the morning’’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, March 23, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 043 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, March 23, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, March 23, 1994 The House met at 2 p.m. anglophone and francophone families in Quebec has narrowed from 8.2 per cent to 1.9 per cent. _______________ The income gap can be closed, Mr. Speaker, but one has to Prayers conclude that federal policies are not a contributing factor. _______________ * * * [English] STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS CREDIT RATING [English] Mr. Jim Gouk (Kootenay West—Revelstoke): Mr. Speaker, BIODIVERSITY yesterday after the announcement of the downgrading of Cana- da’s rating for foreign currency debt, the Minister of Finance Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport): Mr. Speaker, biodivers- stated it only affected a small portion of our total debt so it was ity means a richness of life as it surrounds us in nature. We must no big deal. preserve biodiversity because it is nature’s protection against catastrophes. The loss of biodiversity has serious implications Now the Bank of Canada has increased its key lending rate for life on earth. which undoubtedly will result in increased borrowing costs for Canadian consumers and businesses. It is also having an impact We have been told that since the beginning of the century 75 on the cost of government borrowing. per cent of crop diversity has been lost. This leaves us vulner- able. For example uniformity in corn crops could have resulted The budget did not address the deficit or debt. Now all in disaster when a severe blight threatened corn crops in the Canadians are starting to pay for this short–sightedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • The Requisites of Leadership in the Modern House of Commons 1
    Number 4 November 2001 CANADIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP HE EQUISITES OF EADERSHIP THE REQUISITES OF LEADERSHIP IN THE MODERN HOUSE OF COMMONS Paper by: Cristine de Clercy Department of Political Studies University of Saskatchewan Canadian Members of the Study of Parliament Executive Committee Group 2000-2001 The Canadian Study of President Parliament Group (CSPG) was created Leo Doyle with the object of bringing together all those with an interest in parliamentary Vice-President institutions and the legislative F. Leslie Seidle process, to promote understanding and to contribute to their reform and Past President improvement. Judy Cedar-Wilson The constitution of the Canadian Treasurer Study of Parliament Group makes Antonine Campbell provision for various activities, including the organization of conferences and Secretary seminars in Ottawa and elsewhere in James R. Robertson Canada, the preparation of articles and various publications, the Counsellors establishment of workshops, the Dianne Brydon promotion and organization of public William Cross discussions on parliamentary affairs, David Docherty participation in public affairs programs Jeff Heynen on radio and television, and the Tranquillo Marrocco sponsorship of other educational Louis Massicotte activities. Charles Robert Jennifer Smith Membership is open to all those interested in Canadian legislative institutions. Applications for membership and additional information concerning the Group should be addressed to the Secretariat, Canadian Study of Parliament Group, Box 660, West Block, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0A6. Tel: (613) 943-1228, Fax: (613) 995- 5357. INTRODUCTION This is the fourth paper in the Canadian Study of Parliament Groups Parliamentary Perspectives. First launched in 1998, the perspective series is intended as a vehicle for distributing both studies prepared by academics and the reflections of others who have a particular interest in these themes.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Ea to 5Anjs Conservation Alliance
    5ea to 5anJs Conservation Alliance Ph. (250) 964-2476 E-mail: sea2sands(EJgmail.com Blogsite: s2sca.blogspot.com January 26, 2010 C.) The Honourable Jim Prentice — - Minister of Environment Government of Canada By Email Correspondence to: Jim.Prenticeec.gc.ca cc Dear Sir: C Re: Enbridge Northern Gateway Project — Final Agreement on Joint Review Process This letter is to state the opinions of the Sea to Sands Conservation Alliance with regards to the terms of the Final Agreement on the Joint Review Panel process for the Enbridge Northern Gateway crude oil/ condensate twin pipelines. We are a group of concerned citizens based out of Prince George, British Columbia with support from across western Canada. Prince George is a community that lies in close proximity to the proposed Enbridge pipelines route, and is inhabited by people that are closely tied to the surrounding land. We recently formed the Sea to Sands Conservation Alliance to express our concern for this rnega-project. Interest in our group has been considerable and our groups already have well over 600 supporters; opposition to this pipeline project is increasing daily throughout British Columbia. We count ourselves as part of a broader network of concerned citizens. Our reasons for opposing the terms of the final agreement on the Joint Review Panel are as follows: 1. We seriously question whether a three-member panel comprised of two National Energy Board members and one Environment Minister appointed member will be adequate to evaluate this process. This is because of the magnitude of this project, its broad-sweeping implications and the number of communities and stakeholders that will be affected by it.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns
    Choice or Consensus?: The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns Jared J. Wesley PhD Candidate Department of Political Science University of Calgary Paper for Presentation at: The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan May 30, 2007 Comments welcome. Please do not cite without permission. CHOICE OR CONSENSUS?: THE 2006 FEDERAL LIBERAL AND ALBERTA CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP CAMPAIGNS INTRODUCTION Two of Canada’s most prominent political dynasties experienced power-shifts on the same weekend in December 2006. The Liberal Party of Canada and the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta undertook leadership campaigns, which, while different in context, process and substance, produced remarkably similar outcomes. In both instances, so-called ‘dark-horse’ candidates emerged victorious, with Stéphane Dion and Ed Stelmach defeating frontrunners like Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae, Jim Dinning, and Ted Morton. During the campaigns and since, Dion and Stelmach have been labeled as less charismatic than either their predecessors or their opponents, and both of the new leaders have drawn skepticism for their ability to win the next general election.1 This pair of surprising results raises interesting questions about the nature of leadership selection in Canada. Considering that each race was run in an entirely different context, and under an entirely different set of rules, which common factors may have contributed to the similar outcomes? The following study offers a partial answer. In analyzing the platforms of the major contenders in each campaign, the analysis suggests that candidates’ strategies played a significant role in determining the results. Whereas leading contenders opted to pursue direct confrontation over specific policy issues, Dion and Stelmach appeared to benefit by avoiding such conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..144 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 137 Ï NUMBER 149 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, February 26, 2002 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 9227 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, February 26, 2002 The House met at 10 a.m. Mr. Jim Pankiw: Yes, Mr. Speaker. I would like to move concurrence in the 15th report of the Standing Committee on Public Prayers Accounts. Mr. Geoff Regan: Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The members on this side expected that you might seek concurrence or unanimous consent to return to motions. Is it your feeling that there ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS was an error with the situation? Ï (1000) The Speaker: Yes, the Chair heard the hon. member call a point [English] of order when the hon. member for Scarborough Southwest was on his feet presenting a petition. I did not see him rise but I did not look GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS up because I had not been told any motion would be moved. I Mr. Geoff Regan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of assumed we would be sailing right through so I moved quite quickly. the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, Under the circumstances my inclination is to allow the hon. pursuant to Standing Order 36(8) I have the honour to table, in both member to move his motion. Because we did not have notice I am official languages, the government's response to three petitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Vellacott V Saskatoon Starphoenix Group Inc. 2012 SKQB
    QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN Citation: 2012 SKQB 359 Date: 2012 08 31 Docket: Q.B.G. No. 1725 I 2002 Judicial Centre: Saskatoon IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON BETWEEN: MAURICE VELLACOTT, Plaintiff -and- SASKATOON STARPHOENIX GROUP INC., DARREN BERNHARDT and JAMES PARKER, Defendants Counsel: Daniel N. Tangjerd for the plaintiff Sean M. Sinclair for the defendants JUDGMENT DANYLIUKJ. August 31,2012 Introduction [1] The cut-and-thrust of politics can be a tough, even vicious, business. Not for the faint of heart, modem politics often means a participant's actions are examined - 2 - under a very public microscope, the lenses of which are frequently controlled by the media. While the media has obligations to act responsibly, there is no corresponding legal duty to soothe bruised feelings. [2] The plaintiff seeks damages based on his allegation that the defendants defamed him in two newspaper articles published in the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix newspaper on March 4 and 5, 2002. The defendants state the words complained of were not defamatory and, even if they were, that they have defences to the claim. [3] To better organize this judgment, I have divided it into the following sections: Para~raphs Facts 4-45 Issues 46 Analysis 47- 115 1. Are the words complained of defamatory? 47-73 2. Does the defence of responsible journalism avail the defendants? 74-83 3. Does the defence of qualified privilege avail the defendants? 84-94 4. Does the defence of fair comment avail the defendants? 95- 112 5. Does the defence of consent avail the defendants? 113 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan
    QUEEN’S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN Citation: 2012 SKQB 359 Date: 20120831 Docket: Q.B.G.No. 1725/2002 Judicial Centre: Saskatoon IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON BETWEEN: MAURICE VELLACOTT, Plaintiff - and - SASKATOON STARPHOENIX GROUP INC., DARREN BERNFIARDT and JAMES PARKER, Defendants Counsel: Daniel N. Tangjerd for the plaintiff Sean M. Sinclair for the defendants JUDGMENT DANYLIUK J. August 31, 2012 Introduction [1] The cut-and-thrust of politics can be a tough, even vicious, business. Not for the faint of heart, modern politics often means a participant’s actions are examined -2- under a very public microscope, the lenses of which are frequently controlled by the media. While the media has obligations to act responsibly, there is no corresponding legal duty to soothe bruised feelings. [2] The plaintiff seeks damages based on his allegation that the defendants defamed him in two newspaper articles published in the Saskatoon Star-Phoenix newspaper on March 4 and 5,2002. The defendants state the words complained of were not defamatory and, even if they were, that they have defences to the claim. [3] To better organize this judgment, I have divided it into the following sections: [tern Paragraphs Facts 4 - 45 Issues 46 Analysis 47 - 115 1. Are the words complained of defamatory? 47 - 73 2. Does the defence of responsible journalism avail the defendants? 74 - 83 3. Does the defence of qualified privilege avail the defendants? 84 - 94 4. Does the defence of fair comment avail the defendants? 95- 112 5. Does the defence of consent avail the defendants? 113 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mississauga Reception
    REGIONAL RECEPTION Mississauga reception Story by Harrison Lowman, photos by Sumeeta Kohli and Susan Simms On Wednesday, February 10, the CAFP was welcomed to Mississauga City Hall by Mayor Bonnie Crombie. Attendees heard from the Mayor, the VP of the Ontario Former Members Association, David Warner and CAFP’s own Hon. Andy Mitchell. Attendees at the Mississauga gathering. Mayor Bonnie Crombie welcomes CAFP and CAFP President, Hon. Andy Mitchell at Mis- Hon. Gurbax Malhi, Hon. Andy Mitchell, the Ontario Association of Former Members of sissauga City Hall. Mayor Bonnie Crombie, John Nunziata, and Parliament to Mississauga. Terence Young. Mayor Bonnie Crombie alongside Hon. Jean Geoff Scott and Mayor Crombie. Dorothy Price, Mayor Crombie and Hon. Vim Augustine. Kochhar. Page 2 Beyond the Hill • Spring 2016 Beyond the Hill • Spring 2016 Page 3 Beyond the Hill Canadian Association of Former Parliamentarians Volume 12, Issue No. 2 Spring 2016 CONTENTS First ever global anti-corruption award goes Regional Reception in Mississauga 2 Story by Harrison Lowman, to Yemeni parliamentarian 25 photos by Sumeeta Kohli and Susan Simms By Scott Hitchcox CAFP News 4 Election Observation in Haiti 26 How the President sees it 5 By Hayley Chazan By Hon. Andy Mitchell How it works 30 Why not join the CAFP 6 By Hon. John Reid By Scott Hitchcox It seems to me 32 Association of Former Members of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia By Dorothy Dobbie annual dinner 7 Teachers Institute on Canadian Story by Hon. David Anderson, photo by Rob Lee Parliamentary Democracy 33 Parliamentary internship gateway to By Harrison Lowman exciting careers 8 By Harrison Lowman Where are they now? 34 Provincial and National Associations’ Meeting 11 By Hayley Chazan, Scott Hitchcox By Harrison Lowman and Harrison Lowman The return of the Rhino Party 12 Book shelf: Tamboura: The eruption that By Harrison Lowman changed the world 38 New Poet Laureate named 15 By Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection: Green, Max: Files Box: 42
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Green, Max: Files Folder Title: Briefing International Council of the World Conference on Soviet Jewry 05/12/1988 Box: 42 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library Collection Name GREEN, MAX: FILES Withdrawer MID 11/23/2001 File Folder BRIEFING INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL & THE WORLD FOIA CONFERENCE ON SOVIET JEWRY 5/12/88 F03-0020/06 Box Number THOMAS 127 DOC Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions NO Pages 1 NOTES RE PARTICIPANTS 1 ND B6 2 FORM REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENTS 1 5/11/1988 B6 Freedom of Information Act - [5 U.S.C. 552(b)] B-1 National security classified Information [(b)(1) of the FOIA) B-2 Release would disclose Internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA) B-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA) B-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial Information [(b)(4) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted Invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA) B-7 Release would disclose Information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA) B-8 Release would disclose Information concerning the regulation of financial Institutions [(b)(B) of the FOIA) B-9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical Information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA) C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cord Weekly (January 30, 1992)
    AWlLFRID lAURIER UNIVERSilY STUDENT PUBUCATION VOLUME XXXII, ISSUE 19 THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 1992 His name is Sheffield... Fisher Sheffield. IN FAT ITY \ ~· ""'~""':" - _ • , • \ I f f l II Did you ever see a dream walking7 He laughed cruelly. "She's that I snarled, ''I'm gonna amputate The Cord. His first major article, little whore who's always hang- your tongue! I'm gonna rip your "Savagery and Sorrow in ing around the weight room." intestines out through your bum!" Steeltown", did not have the ,.~ I froze. Everything went quiet, I growled, as I drove my fists into catharic value that he thought it '] C.lll and became very focussed. A his face and ribs, and he started to would: oh sure, the article helped cold fury flashed through me. My breath funny... him work out the nature of his hands slowly curled up into fists. As I drove the guy head-first new relationship with his best so I put my elbow in his back, "What did you just say?" I into the cereal shelf, I saw the friend, the wangely-named Dub- I've held a lot of different and dropped a 2 L can of tomato hissed. manager of the supermarket out Dub-Dub, and allowed him to )lbs in my lifetime, but I'd have paste on his foot. He was grinning. "I said, your of the comer of my eye: my ex- vent his sadness and anger 10 say that my favourite job was "Jerk. .. you got a problem?" he sister's a whore." boss had rounded up some of the towards the girl, the ever- as a stock boy at the Jones turned to me and asked.
    [Show full text]