DOCSLIB.ORG

5Ea to 5Anjs Conservation Alliance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5Ea to 5Anjs Conservation Alliance 5ea to 5anJs Conservation Alliance Ph. (250) 964-2476 E-mail: sea2sands(EJgmail.com Blogsite: s2sca.blogspot.com January 26, 2010 C.) The Honourable Jim Prentice — - Minister of Environment Government of Canada By Email Correspondence to: Jim.Prenticeec.gc.ca cc Dear Sir: C Re: Enbridge Northern Gateway Project — Final Agreement on Joint Review Process This letter is to state the opinions of the Sea to Sands Conservation Alliance with regards to the terms of the Final Agreement on the Joint Review Panel process for the Enbridge Northern Gateway crude oil/ condensate twin pipelines. We are a group of concerned citizens based out of Prince George, British Columbia with support from across western Canada. Prince George is a community that lies in close proximity to the proposed Enbridge pipelines route, and is inhabited by people that are closely tied to the surrounding land. We recently formed the Sea to Sands Conservation Alliance to express our concern for this rnega-project. Interest in our group has been considerable and our groups already have well over 600 supporters; opposition to this pipeline project is increasing daily throughout British Columbia. We count ourselves as part of a broader network of concerned citizens. Our reasons for opposing the terms of the final agreement on the Joint Review Panel are as follows: 1. We seriously question whether a three-member panel comprised of two National Energy Board members and one Environment Minister appointed member will be adequate to evaluate this process. This is because of the magnitude of this project, its broad-sweeping implications and the number of communities and stakeholders that will be affected by it. 2. The mandate of the National Energy Board seems to be too narrow to properly allow panel members to address the variety of issues at stake. Of particular concern is the panel’s decision to exclude the environmental impacts of the tar sands expansion in its environmental assessment. This is very disconcerting because the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline could result in up to 30 percent increase in oil 1 sands production. It seems short-sighted and inappropriate to disregard direct broader impacts of a project in an assessment. 3. Other pipelines in Canada of a similar magnitude have had more involved and sophisticated review processes. For example, the Mackenzie gas pipeline joint review panel terms of reference were drafted in conjunction with First Nations and were much more comprehensive. The scope of this review included, among other things, questions about whether the project would contribute to sustainability within the region. 4. The concerns of the public, submitted during the public consultation process leading up to finalizing the agreement, have not been adequately addressed in the terms of this agreement. For instance, many members of the public noted the issue of the moratorium on oil tanker traffic on this part of the coast. There has been a long standing moratorium on oil tanker traffic through the coastal inland waters of northern British Columbia, initiated in 1972 and confirmed by Natural Resources Canada in 2003. The terms of the Joint Review Panel do not provide for adequate dialogue about whether British Columbians want this long-standing moratorium against oil tanker traffic lifted. 5. Aboriginal rights are not sufficiently addressed, particularly their right to consultation confirmed by the Constitution and the common law. Several local First Nations in our area (Carrier Sekani Tribal Council, Takla First Nation and Nadleh Whut’en) have already issued media releases in response to the finalization of the Joint Review Process. These groups state that their Aboriginal rights are being violated. We fully support the position of First Nations groups from our area concerning this issue. 6. We are concerned about the potential for lack of administrative fairness on the panel. We do acknowledge that it is stated in the agreement that the members are to be “unbiased and free from any conflict of interest in relation to the project”. However, we remain concerned that in your capacity as Environment Minister, you are selecting one of the three panel members. Our reason for concern is that you have been quoted many times as being in support of oil sands production and increasing markets for same, Mr. Prentice. Some examples: • “Prentice defends oilsands following National Geographic article,” retrieved on January 15, 2010 from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/storv/2009/02/25/oiFsands-articles.html. • “Speaking Points of Jim Prentice” (as Minister of Industry) retrieved on January 15, 2010 from http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/icl.nsf/engJOlg7O.html. • “Prentice won’t rule out oilsands emissions breaks” retrieved on January 15, 2010 from htt p ://www . cbc .ca/po lit i cs/storvI2009/1 2/15/prentice-oil-sands. html. • “Alberta to US: Use the oil sands or lose them,” retrieved on January 15, 2010, from 2 http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/08/3 1/alberta-to-u-s-use-the-oilsands-or-Iose-them.aspx. During your previous portfolio as Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (May 23, 2006), you are quoted on a federal government website iii an address to the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association in Calgary, Alberta, as follows: “1 understand the enormous potential that oil and gas development will bring to the country... Growing global demano for energy and upward pressure on prices have made new projects feasible. The Gateway pipeline project is another priority.” In this same address, you emphasized a Conservative government ‘concerted and coordinated federal response on major pipeline projects [that] will allow [your government] to focus multi-departmental resources on critical impediments that threaten projects’ Finally, you also spoke of your mandate at the time offering opportunities to ‘create powerful synergies to realize the potential of pipeline development.” The above quotes retrieved January 15, 2010, from bttp://www.ainc inac.gc.ca/aifmr/spchf200&/cepaad-eng.asn. We question whether through your various statements referenced here and elsewhere, you have expressed support for this pipeline project proceeding? Our concerns about this review panel are not alleviated by the inclusion of two National Energy Board members. The vast majority of energy projects reviewed by the National Energy Board are approved (see for instance “environmentalists say scope of hearings is too narrow,’ Victoria Times Colonist, December 5, 2009, retrieved from www.timescolonist.com on December 5, 2009). While the National Energy Board certainly has a role to play, we are concerned that they comprise two thirds of the panel, given the broad scope of the issues at stake relating to this project. In closing, the terms set in the Final Agreement on the Joint Review Panel process do not reflect the concerns of the citizens and First Nations that would be directly impacted by the Enbridge Northern Gateway project. An impartial review is necessary, which includes an appropriate scope that allows for the relevant issues to be discussed and addressed. There have been numerous calls from the public for a comprehensive public inquiry into this project (several of which were articulated during the public input time frame leading up to the formulation of this finalized agreement). We would like you to consider those calls and establish a comprehensive review process that would have the support of the First Nations and citizens of Canada that you represent. 3 This project has far reaching negative implications on our First Nations rights, the sustainable use of resources, our environment, our international reputation and our natural and cultural heritage. Please contact us at [email protected] if you would ike to discuss any of the foregoing concerns. On behalf of Sea to Sandsc - on Affiance: • - L—4ZirjVi tyK) Josh DeLeenheer ary MacDohid Spokesperson Spokesperson CC: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Hon. Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada Hon. Tony Clement, Minister of Industry Hon. Lisa Raitt, Minister of Natural Resources Hon. Stockwell Day, Minister of International trade and the Asia-Pacific Gateway Hon Jay Full, Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and MP, Dick Harris, MP, Nathan Cullen, MP, Bulkleyskeena Gaetan Caron, Chair, National Energy Board Carrier Sekani Tribal Council Media 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wednesday, March 23, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 043 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, March 23, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, March 23, 1994 The House met at 2 p.m. anglophone and francophone families in Quebec has narrowed from 8.2 per cent to 1.9 per cent. _______________ The income gap can be closed, Mr. Speaker, but one has to Prayers conclude that federal policies are not a contributing factor. _______________ * * * [English] STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS CREDIT RATING [English] Mr. Jim Gouk (Kootenay West—Revelstoke): Mr. Speaker, BIODIVERSITY yesterday after the announcement of the downgrading of Cana- da’s rating for foreign currency debt, the Minister of Finance Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport): Mr. Speaker, biodivers- stated it only affected a small portion of our total debt so it was ity means a richness of life as it surrounds us in nature. We must no big deal. preserve biodiversity because it is nature’s protection against catastrophes. The loss of biodiversity has serious implications Now the Bank of Canada has increased its key lending rate for life on earth. which undoubtedly will result in increased borrowing costs for Canadian consumers and businesses. It is also having an impact We have been told that since the beginning of the century 75 on the cost of government borrowing. per cent of crop diversity has been lost. This leaves us vulner- able. For example uniformity in corn crops could have resulted The budget did not address the deficit or debt. Now all in disaster when a severe blight threatened corn crops in the Canadians are starting to pay for this short–sightedness.
    [Show full text]
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, February 27, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 133 S NUMBER 001 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, February 27, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates and the Proceedings of Committee evidence are accessible on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, February 27, 1996 _______________ [English] Prayers SPEECH FROM THE THRONE _______________ The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that when the House of Commons did attend His Excellency the Governor SECOND SESSION—35TH General this day in the Senate chamber, His Excellency was PARLIAMENT—OPENING pleased to make a speech to both Houses of Parliament. To prevent mistakes I have obtained a copy which is as follows: [English] * * * The Parliament which had been prorogued on February 2, 1996, met this day at Ottawa for the dispatch of business. SPEECH FROM THE THRONE TO OPEN The House met at two o’clock, the Speaker in the chair. THE SECOND SESSION The Speaker read a communication from the Secretary to the THIRTY-FIFTH PARLIAMENT OF CANADA Governor General announcing that His Excellency the Governor General would proceed to the Senate chamber at 1.50 p.m. on this February 27, 1996 day for the purpose of formally opening the Second Session of the 35th Parliament of Canada. Ladies and Gentlemen, Honourable Members of the Senate; Ladies and Gentlemen, Members of the House of Commons: A message was delivered by the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod as follows: A year ago when I became Governor General, I spoke about the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reform Paritof Canada Principles and Policies 1991 Table of Contents
    "BUILDING NEW CANADA" REFORM PARITOF CANADA PRINCIPLES AND POLICIES 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADER'S FOREWORD: "BUILDING NEW CANADA" iv Triple-E Senate 5 Regional FairnessTest 6 Popular Ratification of Constitutional Change 6 Entrenchment of Property Rights 6 Supreme Court 7 Statusof The Territories 7 Future Constitutional Negotiations 7 Better Representationin Parliament ParliamentalY Reform Referendum, Initiative and Recall Electoral Reform Industrial Development and Diversification .13 Domestic Trade and Transportation .J 4 Agriculture .15 Energy .J7 Monetary Policy and Interest Rates .18 Banking System .18 Labour-ManagementRelations .18 FISCAL REFORM Deficit Reduction .20 Tax Reform .21 Balanced Budget .22 Privatization and Crown Corporations .22 The Reform Party's Principles and Policies Parliamentary Spending .22 1991 is the authoritative reference guide for the Government Procurement .23 official policy positions of the Reform Patty of ENVIRONMENTAL REFORM Canada as adopted by Party Assemblies. Sustainable Development .24 The basic format of this "Blue Book" remains Coordinated Action .25 Pollution Control .26 unchanged from the 1990 edition. The principal Environmentally-Sensitive Zoning .27 objective of this format is to assist Party Members Drift-Net Fishing .27 and Party Assemblies in understanding, debating, SOCIAL REFORM and deciding the policy positions of the Party. Alternatives to the Welfare State .28 Those comparing this edition with the 1990 Income Securiry and Income Support .29 edition will notice the following changes: Unemployment Insurance .29 Social Services .30 1. This edition incorporates changes to principles Medicare .30 and policies adopted by resolutions of the Child Care .30 Family Law .31 Party Assembly in Saskatoon, April 4-7, 1991. Justice . .31 These changes include amendments, RCMP .31 additions, and deletions to previous policy Native Affairs .32 Official Languages .32 statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, May 26, 1998
    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 109 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, May 26, 1998 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7187 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, May 26, 1998 The House met at 10 a.m. [English] _______________ CANADA POST CORPORATION ACT Ms. Paddy Torsney (Burlington, Lib.) moved for leave to Prayers introduce Bill C-409, an act to amend the Canada Post Corporation _______________ Act (letter that cannot be transmitted by post). She said: Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to present this private D (1005) member’s bill, an act to amend the Canada Post Corporation Act. [English] Once it is enacted it will ensure that Canada Post does not deliver contests or prizes which instruct people to pay a fee in order to ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT claim their prize. An extraordinary amount of Canadians are inadvertently subject to these fees and moneys are collected. I think The Speaker: I have the honour to lay upon the table, pursuant it is a consumer rip-off. to section 23(3) of the Auditor General Act, the report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development It would also instruct Canada Post not to deliver letters that to the House of Commons for the year 1998. inadvertently display logos which mimic government logos on their envelopes. This is again intended to confuse or rip-off [Translation] Canadian consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Débats De La Chambre Des Communes
    CANADA Débats de la Chambre des communes re e VOLUME 137 Ï NUMÉRO 133 Ï 1 SESSION Ï 37 LÉGISLATURE COMPTE RENDU OFFICIEL (HANSARD) Le lundi 28 janvier 2002 Présidence de l'honorable Peter Milliken TABLE DES MATIÈRES (La table des matières quotidienne des délibérations se trouve à la fin du présent numéro.) Toutes les publications parlementaires sont disponibles sur le réseau électronique « Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire » à l'adresse suivante : http://www.parl.gc.ca 8297 CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES Le lundi 28 janvier 2002 La séance est ouverte à 11 heures. aussi promis au ministre que j'interviendrais à la Chambre pour réitérer ces excuses à la première occasion et c'est aujourd'hui la Prière toute première occasion depuis lors. Ï (1100) Ma carrière de plus de 50 ans en vie publique a été totalement [Traduction] exempte d'incident de la sorte. Je peux assurer aux députés que tous VACANCE DE SIÈGES les collègues qui m'ont connu dans mes divers postes le confirmeraient. SAINT-BONIFACE, WINDSOR-OUEST, SAINT-LÉONARD—SAINT MICHEL ET BONAVISTA—TRINITY—CONCEPTION Le Président: Il est de mon devoir d'informer la Chambre que certains sièges sont dorénavant vacants, notamment celui du député J'ai aussi présenté des excuses à mon épouse, à ma famille, à mes de la circonscription de Saint-Boniface, M. Ronald Duhamel, qui a trois soeurs chinoises et, croyez-le ou non, à mon beau-frère démissionné le 14 janvier 2002; celui du député de Windsor-Ouest, japonais. Ils ont tous souffert comme moi de cet incident. J'ai déjà M.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the House of Commons
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) Volume 150 No. 048 Friday, December 11, 2020 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 3321 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, December 11, 2020 The House met at 10 a.m. love to be able to support it because it is a great gift, but I think I am going to have to give it a lump of coal, unfortunately, that might increase greenhouse gases too. Because there are so many faults in this bill, it really is very difficult for me to figure out where exactly Prayer I can start. GOVERNMENT ORDERS Maybe I will start with last night. Like many Canadians, my wife and I were at home doing things that Canadians do. We were not ● (1005) drinking Sortilège and eating tourtière. I think everybody would [English] like to be doing that, but we were streaming a series that my wife likes. We were bingeing on a series called Virgin River. It is a very BROADCASTING ACT interesting romantic drama series, a series I would normally not The House resumed from December 10 consideration of the mo‐ want to watch, but when wives say they want to watch a romantic tion that Bill C-10, An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to drama series, it is really important that their husbands pay attention make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, be read to that. the second time and referred to a committee. Mr. Colin Carrie (Oshawa, CPC): Madam Speaker, we are de‐ bating Bill C-10, an act to amend the Broadcasting Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Identification of Ideology In
    Computational Identification of Ideology in Text: A Study of Canadian Parliamentary Debates Yaroslav Riabinin Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G4, Canada February 23, 2009 In this study, we explore the task of classifying members of the 36th Cana- dian Parliament by ideology, which we approximate using party mem- bership. Earlier work has been done on data from the U.S. Congress by applying a popular supervised learning algorithm (Support Vector Ma- chines) to classify Senatorial speech, but the results were mediocre unless certain limiting assumptions were made. We adopt a similar approach and achieve good accuracy — up to 98% — without making the same as- sumptions. Our findings show that it is possible to use a bag-of-words model to distinguish members of opposing ideological classes based on English transcripts of their debates in the Canadian House of Commons. 1 Introduction Internet technology has empowered users to publish their own material on the web, allowing them to make the transition from readers to authors. For example, people are becoming increasingly accustomed to voicing their opinions regarding various prod- ucts and services on websites like Epinions.com and Amazon.com. Moreover, other users appear to be searching for these reviews and incorporating the information they acquire into their decision-making process during a purchase. This indicates that mod- 1 ern consumers are interested in more than just the facts — they want to know how other customers feel about the product, which is something that companies and manu- facturers cannot, or will not, provide on their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, March 5, 1999
    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 190 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, March 5, 1999 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 12481 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, March 5, 1999 The House met at 10 a.m. As I said, it is important from my point of view to put into context the importance of Bill C-49 and the contribution that it will _______________ make to ensuring a commitment which this government has to work with first nations to build self-reliance and to provide first Prayers nations the opportunity to have the social and economic control _______________ that they need to have to better their lives within the community and the lives of their community members. GOVERNMENT ORDERS Second, if I have the time I would like to explore some of the issues that have been raised in the last few days with respect to Bill D (1000 ) C-49. I anticipate that I will be able to do that. If not, I know my parliamentary secretary will speak to some of those issues. [English] First and foremost, let us consider the context in which Bill C-49 FIRST NATIONS LAND MANAGEMENT ACT finds itself. In this regard I would like to remind the House about Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern the fact that the primary relationship that I as minister of Indian Development, Lib.) moved that Bill C-49, an act providing for the affairs and the Government of Canada has with first nations is ratification and the bringing into effect of the framework agree- through the Indian Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, June 7, 1995
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 213 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 7, 1995 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 7, 1995 The House met at 2 p.m. Power DirecTv matter, his less than timely visit to Los Angeles and its impact on the Seagram matter, the minister just keeps on _______________ going. Prayers Why should we be surprised that the minister accepted to be the host of a $2,000 a plate dinner organized by a lobbying firm? _______________ Why should we be surprised to see that the minister’s office awarded that very firm three contracts? STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS In light of these revelations, one question comes to mind: Why does the Prime Minister protect this minister who is [English] singlehandedly bringing down the semblance of respectability and ethical conduct that the government has so painstakingly ONTARIO ELECTION built for itself? Mr. Benoît Serré (Timiskaming—French River, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, tomorrow Ontarians will be called on to elect a new * * * government. [English] Mike Harris and his crew are catering to the extreme right by promising unrealistic tax and spending cuts. I call on the ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS Conservative leader to come clean with Ontarians and tell them Mr. Dick Harris (Prince George—Bulkley Valley, Ref.): exactly how these cuts are to affect education, health care and Mr. Speaker, the native blockade at the Douglas Lake ranch has social programs. finally come to an end. It was taken down not because the RCMP I pledge my full support behind Lyn McLeod and her excellent enforced the law and removed this illegal blockade but appar- team of candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I, Extra
    EXTRA Vol. 134, No. 14 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 134, no 14 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2000 OTTAWA, LE VENDREDI 8 DÉCEMBRE 2000 CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members Elected at the 37th General Election Rapport de députés(es) élus(es) à la 37e élection générale Notice is herebygiven, pursuant to section 317 of the Canada Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’article 317 Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, have been de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports,dansl’ordre received of the election of members to serve in the House of ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élection de députés(es) à Commons of Canada for the following electoral districts: la Chambre des communes du Canada pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral Districts Members Circonscriptions Députés(es) Lac-Saint-Louis Clifford Lincoln Lac-Saint-Louis Clifford Lincoln Glengarry—Prescott—Russell Don Boudria Glengarry—Prescott—Russell Don Boudria Edmonton Southeast David Kilgour Edmonton-Sud-Est David Kilgour Haldimand—Norfolk—Brant Bob Speller Haldimand—Norfolk—Brant Bob Speller Hamilton West Stan Keyes Hamilton-Ouest Stan Keyes Sudbury Diane Marleau Sudbury Diane Marleau Repentigny Benoît Sauvageau Repentigny Benoît Sauvageau York South—Weston Alan Tonks York-Sud—Weston Alan Tonks Châteauguay Robert Lanctôt Châteauguay Robert Lanctôt Oak Ridges Bryon Wilfert Oak Ridges Bryon Wilfert St. Catharines
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Economy
    RURAL ECONOMY Community Response to Forestry Transition in Rural Canada: Analysis of Media and Census Data for Six Case Study Communities in New Brunswick and British Columbia Mark Smith and John R. Parkins Project Report #11-01 Project Report Department of Rural Economy Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton, Canada Community response to forestry transition in rural Canada: Analysis of media and census data for six case study communities in New Brunswick and British Columbia Mark Smith & John R. Parkins The authors are, respectively, a Research Associate in the Department of Rural Economy with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology, and Associate Professor (Rural Sociology) in the Department of Rural Economy. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council in the completion of this project. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Guiding theoretical frameworks........................................................................................................... 2 Key thematic areas within the community reports ............................................................................... 4 Resilience in Quesnel ....................................................................................................................... 4 Diversification as an organizing concept for action ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]