Marine Organisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Marine Organisms Marine vs. Terrestrial Life Marine Terrestrial Organisms – similar density as Organisms – much higher density than environment (salt water) less energy to air … than to walk or fly. float/swim… small effect of gravity High gravity impact (fall down) Water supports bodies, no need to put Need strong skeletal material (animals: energy in skeletons bones; trees: trunks) Plenty of water for life May become water limited Temperature variation low Temperature varies strongly Light limited: reflection of light at sea Light energy substantially higher than in surface and rapid light absorption with aquatic systems, low absorption by air water depth Nutrient limited: nitrate, phosphate, High nutrient concentrations in natural silicate, iron soils Major part of nutrient regeneration in Nutrient regeneration in soil close to plant the dark deep-sea uptake Physically unstable habitats Physically stable environment Classification by habitat Plankton are those organisms that live suspended in the water column and are too small to be able to swim counter to typical ocean currents, they include phytoplankton, zooplankton and bacteria. Those animals that move in the water column, but they are (اﻟﺴﻮاﺑﺢ:) Nekton capable of more powerful swimming and can move against a current or through turbulent water. They range from small fish, to the largest whales. Include those animals and plants that live attached to the bottom (اﻟﻘﺎﻋﻴﺔ):Benthos or on or in the bottom. Infaunal: Animals that live in the bottom within the sediment such as clams. Epifaunal: Animals that live on or attached to the surface of the bottom, e.g. oysters and barnacles. Semi-infaunal: Those animals that are partially burrow in the bottom e.g Artina. 70 Neuston Nekton Plankton Boring Epifaunal Benthos Semi-faunal Infaunal Plankton Phytoplankton are photosynthetic planktonic protists and plants, and usually consist of single-celled organisms or of chains of cells. Zooplankton all heterotrophic plankton, their size range from 2 µm (heterotrophic flagellates, protists) up to several meter (jellyfish) Mixoplankton are photosynthetic protists, but also can ingest other plankton. Meroplankton are plankton for only part of their life cycle. They include the planktonic larval stages of many benthic invertebrate groups. Holoplankton, are those planktonic organisms that spend all their life cycles as plankton, i.e., Planktonic throughout life. Neuston are the plankton associated with the water surface, such as bacterial films. Pleuston: Planktons that have a float protruding above the sea surface, e.g. Portuguese man-of-war. Classification of Planktonic organisms according to their size • Ultraplankton or picoplankton (<2 µm), • Nanoplankton (2-20 µm), • Microplankton (20-200 µm), • Mesoplankton (0.2-20 mm) 71 • Macroplankton (2-20 cm), • Megaplankton (20-200 cm). Plankton is traditionally sampled by plankton nets with a mesh size of various pore size. Fig. Paired plankton nets are placed overboard. The length of wire and angle of entry are measured to find the depth of sampling. A calibrated propeller gives the volume of water sampled. Plankton Life As we have mentioned before, Plankton are the plants and animals that drift around on the oceans’ currents. Phytoplankton are the microscopic plants that convert sunlight and nutrients to starch and organic matter. Not only do phytoplankton form the base of the oceans’ food chain, they also produce at least 80% of the oxygen that we breathe. Zooplankton on the other hand, are the animal members of the marine planktonic community. Most zooplankton occupy the second or third trophic level of the marine food web. As such, these herbivores and small carnivores play an exceptionally important role in marine food webs. Planktonic organisms usually depend upon the surface waters for survival. Phytoplankton will die unless they are near a source of sunlight for photosynthesis. Zooplankton on the other hand, depend upon phytoplankton, or at least upon animals that consume phytoplankton. Zooplankton, therefore, also must remain in the surface waters. How do plankton keep near the surface or avoid sinking? A particle will remain suspended in water if it is less dense than seawater. Many planktonic organisms however are somewhat denser than seawater and will therefore sink in a quiet water column. Plankton reduce their density relative to that of the surrounding water and avoid sinking to the bottom or to depths greater than a depth at which they can photosynthesize (in case of phytoplankton) or survive by one or more of the following mechanisms: 72 1. By storing (accumulating) oils and other fluids of low density • Diatoms and other organisms such as copepods, and fish eggs and larvae, contain droplets of oil which reduce their density and can serve as food reserves. • Some blue-green bacteria have vacuole-like structures that contain low- density gaseous nitrogen. 2. By having flattened bodies and appendages, spines, and other body projections that increases their surface area and reduces settling velocity. • The bell-shaped jellyfish has flat bottom and tentacles combine to slow sinking relative to a sphere of the same shape and bulk composition. • Some diatoms, such as Chaetoceros, form twisted chains, which spiral as they sink slowly. 3. By having Flotation structures • Portuguese man-of-war Physalia for example have a large gas-filled sac that acts as a float from which the rest of the colony is suspended. 4. By replacing heavier ions with lighter ones • Many zooplankton are replacing dense magnesium, calcium, and sulfate ions with lower-density ammonium, sodium, and chloride. 5. By accumulating ions of low specific gravity • The dinoflagellate Noctiluca, for example, accumulates ions of low specific gravity, which reduces their density. 6. By having the ability to swim sea butterfly) for example, has two lateral winglike) ( ﻣﺠﻨﺤﺔ اﻷﻗﺪام) Pteropods • projections, and the snails flap through the water. • Jellyfish move in pulses, through rapid compressions of circular muscles, which compress the bell and force water backward. • Crustaceans such as copepods use assorted appendages to push against the water to move forward. • Arrow worms swim by undulation. All these swimming methods are effective means of countering sinking. 7. By depending upon water turbulence which keeps organisms suspended in the water column. 73.
Recommended publications
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Cruise News Going Deep: Deepwater Exploration of the Marianas by the Okeanos Explorer

    Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Cruise News Going Deep: Deepwater Exploration of the Marianas by the Okeanos Explorer

    Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Welcome to the eighth edition of Deep-Sea Life: an informal publication about current affairs in the world of deep-sea biology. Once again we have a wealth of contributions from our fellow colleagues to enjoy concerning their current projects, news, meetings, cruises, new publications and so on. The cruise news section is particularly well-endowed this issue which is wonderful to see, with voyages of exploration from four of our five oceans from the Arctic, spanning north east, west, mid and south Atlantic, the north-west Pacific, and the Indian Ocean. Just imagine when all those data are in OBIS via the new deep-sea node…! (see page 24 for more information on this). The photo of the issue makes me smile. Angelika Brandt from the University of Hamburg, has been at sea once more with her happy-looking team! And no wonder they look so pleased with themselves; they have collected a wonderful array of life from one of the very deepest areas of our ocean in order to figure out more about the distribution of these abyssal organisms, and the factors that may limit their distribution within this region. Read more about the mission and their goals on page 5. I always appreciate feedback regarding any aspect of the publication, so that it may be improved as we go forward. Please circulate to your colleagues and students who may have an interest in life in the deep, and have them contact me if they wish to be placed on the mailing list for this publication.
  • Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun

    Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun

    OCEANOGRAPHY – Vol.II - Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, France. Keywords: Algae, allochthonous nutrient, aphotic zone, autochthonous nutrient, Auxotrophs, bacteria, bacterioplankton, benthos, carbon dioxide, carnivory, chelator, chemoautotrophs, ciliates, coastal eutrophication, coccolithophores, convection, crustaceans, cyanobacteria, detritus, diatoms, dinoflagellates, disphotic zone, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic matter (DOM), ecosystem, eukaryotes, euphotic zone, eutrophic, excretion, exoenzymes, exudation, fecal pellet, femtoplankton, fish, fish lavae, flagellates, food web, foraminifers, fungi, harmful algal blooms (HABs), herbivorous food web, herbivory, heterotrophs, holoplankton, ichthyoplankton, irradiance, labile, large planktonic microphages, lysis, macroplankton, marine snow, megaplankton, meroplankton, mesoplankton, metazoan, metazooplankton, microbial food web, microbial loop, microheterotrophs, microplankton, mixotrophs, mollusks, multivorous food web, mutualism, mycoplankton, nanoplankton, nekton, net community production (NCP), neuston, new production, nutrient limitation, nutrient (macro-, micro-, inorganic, organic), oligotrophic, omnivory, osmotrophs, particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic matter (POM), pelagic, phagocytosis, phagotrophs, photoautotorphs, photosynthesis, phytoplankton, phytoplankton bloom, picoplankton, plankton,
  • Abundance of Gelatinous Carnivores in the Nekton Community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in Summer 1994

    Abundance of Gelatinous Carnivores in the Nekton Community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in Summer 1994

    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 141: 139-147, 1996 Published October 3 ' Mar Ecol Prog Ser I Abundance of gelatinous carnivores in the nekton community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in summer 1994 'Alfred-Wegener-Institut fiir Polar- und Meeresforschung. ColumbusstraBe, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 'British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road. Cambridge CB3 OET, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The species composition, abundance, vertical distribution, biovolume and carbon content of gelatinous nekton in the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone are described from a series of RMT25 hauls collected from a series of 200 m depth layers between 0 and 1000 m. In total. 13 species of medusa, 6 species of siphonophore, 3 species of ctenophore and 1 species of salp and nemertean were ~dentified. On average gelatinous organisms contributed 69 3% to the biovolume and 30.3% to the carbon content of the samples, although the ranges were high (0 to 98.9":) and 0 to 62 G"/;,respectively). The most important contributor to the biovolume and carbon content was the scyphomedusan Pel-iphylla peri- phylla. Some specific assoc~ationsand restricted vertlcal d~stl-ibut~ons\vcrc related to trophic interac- tions among ostracods, amphipods and cnidarians. Observations made near South Georgla showed that medusae ancl ctenophores were preyed upon by albatrosses and notothen~oidflsh respectively. The results support the premise that gelatinous organisms are a major and, at tlmes, are the main compo- nent of the oceanic macroplankton/nekton community 111 the Southern Ocean KEY WORDS: Gelatinous nekton Southern Ocean Wet biomass Carbon content. Assemblages INTRODUCTION suspension feeding pelagic tunicates (salps), become dominant (Huntley et al.
  • Censusing Non-Fish Nekton

    Censusing Non-Fish Nekton

    WORKSHOP SYNOPSIS Censusing Non-Fish Nekton Carohln Levi, Gregory Stone and Jerry R. Schubel New England Aquarium ° Boston, Massachusetts USA his is a brief summary of a "Non-Fish SUMMARIES OF WORKING GROUPS Nekton" workshop held on 10-11 December 1997 at the New England Aquarium. The overall goals Cephalopods were: (1) to assess the feasibility of conducting a census New higher-level taxa are yet to be discovered, of life in the sea, (2) to identify the strategies and especially among coleoid cephalopods, which are components of such a census, (3) to assess whether a undergoing rapid evolutionary radiation. There are periodic census would generate scientifically worth- great gaps in natural history and ecosystem function- while results, and (4) to determine the level of interest ing, with even major commercial species largely of the scientific community in participating in the unknown. This is particularly, complex, since these design and conduct of a census of life in the sea. short-lived, rapidly growing animals move up through This workshop focused on "non-fish nekton," which trophic levels in a single season. were defined to include: marine mammals, marine reptiles, cephalopods and "other invertebrates." During . Early consolidation of existing cephalopod data is the course of the workshop, it was suggested that a needed, including the vast literatures in Japanese more appropriate phase for "other invertebrates" is and Russian. Access to and evaluation of historical invertebrate micronekton. Throughout the report we survey, catch, biological and video image data sets have used the latter terminology. and collections is needed. An Internet-based reposi- Birds were omitted only because of lack of time.
  • Arctic Marine Biodiversity

    Arctic Marine Biodiversity

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292115665 Arctic marine biodiversity CHAPTER · JANUARY 2016 READS 142 12 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Lis Lindal Jørgensen Philippe Archambault Institute of Marine Research in Norway Université du Québec à Rimouski UQAR 36 PUBLICATIONS 285 CITATIONS 137 PUBLICATIONS 1,574 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Dieter Piepenburg Jake Rice Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Fisheries and Oceans Canada 71 PUBLICATIONS 1,705 CITATIONS 67 PUBLICATIONS 2,279 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Andrey V. Dolgov letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 19 February 2016 Chapter 36G. Arctic Ocean Contributors: Lis Lindal Jørgensen, Philippe Archambault, Claire Armstrong, Andrey Dolgov, Evan Edinger, Tony Gaston, Jon Hildebrand, Dieter Piepenburg, Walker Smith, Cecilie von Quillfeldt, Michael Vecchione, Jake Rice (Lead member) Referees: Arne Bjørge, Charles Hannah. 1. Introduction 1.1 State The Central Arctic Ocean and the marginal seas such as the Chukchi, East Siberian, Laptev, Kara, White, Greenland, Beaufort, and Bering Seas, Baffin Bay and the Canadian Archipelago (Figure 1) are among the least-known basins and bodies of water in the world ocean, because of their remoteness, hostile weather, and the multi-year (i.e., perennial) or seasonal ice cover. Even the well-studied Barents and Norwegian Seas are partly ice covered during winter and information during this period is sparse or lacking. The Arctic has warmed at twice the global rate, with sea- ice loss accelerating (Figure 2, ACIA, 2004; Stroeve et al., 2012, Chapter 46 in this report), especially along the coasts of Russia, Alaska, and the Canadian Archipelago (Post et al., 2013).
  • Chapter 12 Lecture

    Chapter 12 Lecture

    ChapterChapter 1 12 Clickers Lecture Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition Marine Life and the Marine Environment Alan P. Trujillo Harold V. Thurman © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Overview • Living organisms, including marine species, are classified by characteristics. • Marine organisms are adapted to the ocean’s physical properties. • The marine environment has distinct divisions. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Classification based on physical characteristics • DNA sequencing allows genetic comparison. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Living and nonliving things made of atoms • Life consumes energy from environment. • NASA’s definition encompasses potential for extraterrestrial life. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Working definition of life • Living things can – Capture, store, and transmit energy – Reproduce – Adapt to environment – Change over time © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Three domains or superkingdoms • Bacteria – simple life forms without nuclei • Archaea – simple, microscopic creatures • Eukarya – complex, multicellular organisms – Plants and animals – DNA in discrete nucleus © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Living Organisms • Five kingdoms – Monera – Protoctista – Fungi – Plantae – Animalia © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Five Kingdoms of Organisms • Monera – Simplest organisms, single-celled – Cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, archaea • Protoctista – Single- and multicelled with nucleus –
  • Translation Series No.1839

    Translation Series No.1839

    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No 1839 Marine neustbnology by Yu. P. Zaitsev Original title: - Morskaya Neistonologiya From: Marine Neustonology, Academy of Sciences of the . Ukrainian SSR, Kiev, : 5-262 '1970 Translated by the Translation Bureau(P. • Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of Canada Marine Ecology Laboratory Dartmouth, N. S. 1971_ 401 pages typescript , yu, ID. Zaltriev: arine -NoustonoIoGy, '.aukova duka",10v,.19 ri 2i Introduction ....... 1.44 •ed ' y .... .... »,. • Part .one. Peculiarity of ecoloi3ical conditions of th fflost u,pper reGion of the seas and oceans . ...... ;11 Qhapter I. Illumination, temperature and salinity of water..11 Chapter II. NonlivinG oranic matter 17• Chapter rh e Mololcal activity of sea. foam . • . • chapter IV. Enviroament biotic factors .55 ' Chapter V. co1oica1 peculiarity of "the near-surface sca 1 biotope as the cause of delopin speciai biolQe;ical . structure in it • • e• * 4 4, léte•e. •44 , •....42 Part two. :2éthods of neustonolo&ical research • • • . • Chapter VI. npDssibility of usin existin plFÂnton nct models for neustonoloical purooses . .4*;- Chaoter ome principals upon which the workinG out of .,' the method. of col ec 1rç ond studyin e:; sea neuston cre-bas .47 Direction of haulin and the up,it of_quantittiyo - Calculation , A A C C a 3 C AA•CAAC A A * ('s 47 Optimal se.:)ced of haulins by iaeans of a net . 143 I'animusa disturbance in the natural ;.ater stratification': 'and quantity of population in the net haulinÉ, sono . .51 • . Some technical properties of nets considered While • •roducini; gears for haulin hyponeuston .....
  • Chapter 15 Marrone

    Chapter 15 Marrone

    Chapter 15 Life Near the Surface Pelagic Zone • Pelagic Zone – The vast open sea – Contains almost all of the liquid water on earth Pelagic Zone • Pelagic zone benefits – Regulates our climate – Provides food. • Pelagic organisms live suspended in the water • Lacks the solid substrate provided by the bottom • No place for attachment, no bottom for burrowing, nothing to hide behind Epipelagic Zone • Epipelagic – Upper pelagic – Zone from the surface down to a given depth commonly 200 m (650 ft) – Warmest – Best lit • The photic zone - area where photosynthesis can occur Epipelagic Zone • The epipelagic zone has two main components • Coastal or Nertic – epipelagic waters that lie over the continental shelf – Lies close to shore – Supports most of the world’s marine fisheries production • Oceanic part – Waters beyond the continental shelf The Organisms of the Epipelagic The Epipelagic Zone • Fueled by solar energy captured in photosynthesis • Nearly all primary production takes place within the epiplagic zone. • Supplies food to other communities The Epipelagic Zone • Lacks deposit feeders • Suspension feeders are very common • There are also many large predators like fishes, squids and marine mammals • Plankton is abundant Plankton Plankton • Plankton - live in the water column and cannot swim against the current. • Phytoplankton are autotrophs. – Perform photosynthesis • Zooplankton – are heterotrophs • Plankton can be grouped based on their size – Picoplankton – smallest – Nanoplankton – Microplankton – Mesoplankton – Macroplankton –
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Cruise News E/V Nautilus Telepresence Exploration of the U.S

    Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Cruise News E/V Nautilus Telepresence Exploration of the U.S

    Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Welcome to the 14th edition of Deep-Sea Life (a little later than anticipated… such is life). As always there is bound to be something in here for everyone. Illustrated by stunning photography throughout, learn about the deep-water canyons of Lebanon, remote Pacific Island seamounts, deep coral habitats of the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Southeast USA and the North Atlantic (with good, bad and ugly news), first trials of BioCam 3D imaging technology (very clever stuff), new deep pelagic and benthic discoveries from the Bahamas, high-risk explorations under ice in the Arctic (with a spot of astrobiology thrown in), deep-sea fauna sensitivity assessments happening in the UK and a new photo ID guide for mesopelagic fish. Read about new projects to study unexplored areas of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Azores Plateau, plans to develop a water-column exploration programme, and assessment of effects of ice shelf collapse on faunal assemblages in the Antarctic. You may also be interested in ongoing projects to address and respond to governance issues and marine conservation. It’s all here folks! There are also reports from past meetings and workshops related to deep seabed mining, deep-water corals, deep-water sharks and rays and information about upcoming events in 2020. Glance over the many interesting new papers for 2019 you may have missed, the scientist profiles, job and publishing opportunities and the wanted section – please help your colleagues if you can. There are brief updates from the Deep- Ocean Stewardship Initiative and for the deep-sea ecologists amongst you, do browse the Deep-Sea Biology Society president’s letter.
  • Glossary Animal Physiology

    Glossary Animal Physiology

    Limnology 1 Weisse - WS99/00 Glossary Limnology 1 Biological Zonation of a lentic System: Most organisms can be classified on the basis of their typical habitat. Benthos: The community of plants and animals that live permanently in or on the sea bottom. Littoral (intertidal zone): The trophogenic zone along the shore till the compensation depth where NPP occurs. It is rich in species diversity and number - especially algae and higher plants. • Epilittoral: Sedentary organisms of the shoreline; e.g. macrophytes, diatoms, etc. • Profundal: Depths of 180m and deeper. Limnion: Temperature related zonation of the open water body of lentic systems; i.e. summer stratification due to solar radiation produces several trophic zones - see also ecological aspects - depth zones. • Epilimnion: The upper warm and illuminated surface layer of a lake; narrower than the trophogenic zone. • Metalimnion: The transitional zone between epi- and hypolimnion; i.e. the zone of the thermocline. • Hypolimnion: The cool and poorly illuminated bottom layer of a lake, below the thermocline. Nekton: Pelagic animals that are active swimmers; i.e. most of the adult fishes. Pelagial: The environment of the open water of a lake, away from the bottom, and not in close proximity to the shoreline. It is Lower in species number and diversity than the benthos. The pelagial of rivers exhibits a directed and continuos flux (spatial relocation = amountH2O/cross-surface area). Plankton: Passively drifting or weakly swimming organisms in fresh waters; i.e. microscopic plants, eggs, larval stages of the nekton and benthos (such as phyto-plankton, zoo-plankton). • Neuston: The epipelagic zone few centimeters below the waterline; i.e.
  • The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of the Northeast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonicis

    The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of the Northeast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonicis

    The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of theNortheast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonids Richard D. Brodeur Bruce C. Mundy William G. Pearcy Robert W. Wisseman The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of the Northeast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonicis Richard D. Brodeur William G. Pearcy Bruce C. Mundy Robert W. Wisseman Oregon State University Sea Grant College Program AdS 402 Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Publication No. ORESU-T-87-001 © 1987 by Oregon State University.All rights reserved. AUTHORS Richard 0. Brodeur, senior research assistant, and William G. Pearcy, professor, are with the College of Oceanography at Oregon State University. Bruce C. Mundy works as a fishery biologist at the Honolulu laboratory of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Robert W. Wisseman is a research assistant in the Department of Entomology at Oregon State University. SUPPORT This publication is the result, in part, of research sponsored by Oregon Sea Grant through NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce, under Grant No. NA79AA-D-OO1O (Project No. RICE-jo). The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. The Oregon State University Sea Grant College Program is supported cooperatively by the National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministration, U.S. Department of Commerce, by the state of Oregon, and by participating localgovernments and private industry. ORDERING PUBLICATIONS Copies of this publication are available from Sea Grant Communications Oregon State University AdS MO? Corvallis, OR 97331 Please include author, title, and publication number. Upon request, we will also send a free copy of our catalogue of Oregon State University marine-related puhi ications.
  • Articles and Detrital Matter

    Articles and Detrital Matter

    Biogeosciences, 7, 2851–2899, 2010 www.biogeosciences.net/7/2851/2010/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-7-2851-2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem E. Ramirez-Llodra1, A. Brandt2, R. Danovaro3, B. De Mol4, E. Escobar5, C. R. German6, L. A. Levin7, P. Martinez Arbizu8, L. Menot9, P. Buhl-Mortensen10, B. E. Narayanaswamy11, C. R. Smith12, D. P. Tittensor13, P. A. Tyler14, A. Vanreusel15, and M. Vecchione16 1Institut de Ciencies` del Mar, CSIC. Passeig Mar´ıtim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 2Biocentrum Grindel and Zoological Museum, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 3Department of Marine Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy 4GRC Geociencies` Marines, Parc Cient´ıfic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Adolf Florensa 8, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 5Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnolog´ıa, A.P. 70-305 Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico,` Mexico´ 6Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MS #24, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 7Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0218, USA 8Deutsches Zentrum fur¨ Marine Biodiversitatsforschung,¨ Sudstrand¨ 44, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany 9Ifremer Brest, DEEP/LEP, BP 70, 29280 Plouzane, France 10Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870, Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway 11Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban,