Chapter 15 Marrone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 15 Marrone Chapter 15 Life Near the Surface Pelagic Zone • Pelagic Zone – The vast open sea – Contains almost all of the liquid water on earth Pelagic Zone • Pelagic zone benefits – Regulates our climate – Provides food. • Pelagic organisms live suspended in the water • Lacks the solid substrate provided by the bottom • No place for attachment, no bottom for burrowing, nothing to hide behind Epipelagic Zone • Epipelagic – Upper pelagic – Zone from the surface down to a given depth commonly 200 m (650 ft) – Warmest – Best lit • The photic zone - area where photosynthesis can occur Epipelagic Zone • The epipelagic zone has two main components • Coastal or Nertic – epipelagic waters that lie over the continental shelf – Lies close to shore – Supports most of the world’s marine fisheries production • Oceanic part – Waters beyond the continental shelf The Organisms of the Epipelagic The Epipelagic Zone • Fueled by solar energy captured in photosynthesis • Nearly all primary production takes place within the epiplagic zone. • Supplies food to other communities The Epipelagic Zone • Lacks deposit feeders • Suspension feeders are very common • There are also many large predators like fishes, squids and marine mammals • Plankton is abundant Plankton Plankton • Plankton - live in the water column and cannot swim against the current. • Phytoplankton are autotrophs. – Perform photosynthesis • Zooplankton – are heterotrophs • Plankton can be grouped based on their size – Picoplankton – smallest – Nanoplankton – Microplankton – Mesoplankton – Macroplankton – Megaplankton – largest Plankton • Holoplankton – plankton for their entire life. • Meroplankton – Many fish and invertebrates have planktonic larvae – Temporary members of the plankton – Small larvae feed on phytoplankton – Larger larvae feed on zooplankton Phytoplankton Net Plankton (Micro, Meso, Macro) • Diatoms – Found everywhere – Important primary producers • Dinoflagellates – Found everywhere – Most common in warm waters – Common red tide organisms Picoplankton • Colonial cyanobacteria (Trichodesmium) – mainly tropical – Can fix atmospheric nitrogen – causes red tides in the Red Sea ZooPlankton Zooplankton • Phytoplankton form the base of the food web • Solar energy that they capture and store in organic matter is passed on to the other creatures of the epipelagic from minute zooplankton to gigantic whales • Herbivores eat phytoplankton Zooplankton • Zooplankton are heterotrophic plankton. • Zooplankton are by far the most important herbivores in the epipelagic • Very few zooplankton are strict herbivores most will eat other zooplankton Protozoan Zooplankton • Protozoa - unicellular eukaryotic organisms • Protozoans can catch tiny picoplankton and nanoplankton • Without protozoans, much of the primary production in the epipelagic would go unutilized • Some are photosynthetic and are also considered phytoplankton. • Flagellates, Ciliates, Foraminiferans, Radiolarians Flagellates Foraminiferans Radiolarians Cilliates Crustacean Zooplankton • Copepods – Small crustaceans – Dominate the net zooplankton – Most abundant members of the net zooplankton practically everywhere in the ocean – 70% or more of the community – Major carnivores Copepods Crustacean Zooplankton • Shrimp-Like Krill – Not as abundant as copepods but often aggregate into huge dense swarms – Dominate the plankton in the polar seas – Efficient filter feeders – diatoms are a favorite food, also eat detritus – Relatively big – up to 6 cm – Eaten by fishes, seabirds, great whales Krill Non-Crustacean Zooplantkon • Salps – transparent, planktonic herbivores – filter out plankton by pumping water through a sieve-like sac or a fine mucus net Non-Crustacean Zooplantkon • Larvaceans – float inside a house they make of mucus – beat tail to move water through the house – food particles are caught in a complicated mucus net that is inside the house Non-Crustacean Zooplantkon • Pteropods – Mollusks – small snails that have a foot that has been modified to form a pair of wings that they flap to stay afloat • Arrow Worms or chaetognaths – extremely important predators in the zooplankton – feed mostly on copepods Non-Crustacean Zooplantkon • Jellyfish and siphonophores – large, weak swimmers that drift with the currents – carnivores Nekton • Nekton – Large strong swimmers – Fishes, marine mammals, squids, turtles, sea snakes, penguins – Carnivorous • Most species of nekton eat other nekton • Fishes, squids and large crustaceans are the main foods Nekton • The larger the predator the larger the prey – Herrings (small fish) eat zooplankton • Sperm whale largest of nekton giant eat squid 10 m (33 ft long) Nekton Herring • Planktivorous nekton – eat plankton – includes herrings, sardines and anchovies, whale shark and the basking shark Anchovies Sardines Surviving in the Epipelagic • Demands of the environment cause organisms to have certain adaptations • Two main problems – Need to stay in the epipelagic zone – Need to eat and avoid being eaten • Many of the adaptations of epipelagic animals are related to their need to find food and at the same time avoid being eaten Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Staying afloat – Cells and tissues are denser than water – naturally sink – Shells and skeletons are even more dense – Phytoplankton need to stay for sun – Zooplankton need to stay so they can get prey Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Increase the water resistance so that you sink slower – Drag – resistance to movement through water or any other medium – For Small organisms drag mostly depends on surface area, the higher the surface area the slower the organism sinks this is the reason plankton are so small Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Increase the water resistance so that you sink slower – Shape influences surface area – parachute shape slows sinking (jellyfish) – Flat shapes slow sinking – Long projections or spines increase surface area and therefore decrease the rate of sinking – Forming chains slows sinking Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Swimming organisms rarely have spines as this would increase water resistance and make swimming harder • They generally have adaptations that reduce drag Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Increase buoyancy – Reduces the tendency to sink – Store lipids (Oils or fats) – Lipids are less dense so they tend to float – Diatoms, copepod and fish eggs contain a drop of oil. – Whales, seals and other marine mammals have a great deal of buoyant fat in a thick layer of blubber under the skin – Pocket of gas is another adaptation Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Increase buoyancy – Bony fish have swim bladders – disadvantage – gases expand and contract as the fish moves in the water column Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • The Floaters - Increase Buoyancy – Neuston – organisms that live right at the sea surface but remain underwater – Pleuston – organisms whose bodies project through the sea surface into the air • Most common method is to have a gas- filled structure Surviving in the Epipelagic - Staying Afloat • Floaters - Increased Buoyancy – By-the-wind-sailor (Velella) • colonial jellyfish-like cnidarian that is specialized as a float – Portuguese man-of-war (Physalia) • powerful stingpart of the colony acts as a sail – Violet shell (Janthina) • makes a rafts of mucus filled with bubbles from which it hangs upside down Physalia Velella Janthina Surviving in the Epipelagic - Sense Organs • Highly developed • Vision is important – many have good eyesight • Vision is especially important to the nekton because there are no solid structures to avoid concealment • Lateral line – remote sensing system that sense vibrations in the water – used to stay with school mates and detect predators Surviving in the Epipelagic - Coloring and Camouflage • Protective coloration or camouflage • Nearly universal among epipelagic organisms that are large enough to be seen • Transparent – jellyfish, salps, larvaceans, comb jellies Surviving in the Epipelagic - Coloring and Camouflage • Countershading – dorsal surface (back) is dark usually green, blue or black and the belly (ventral surface) is white or silver – Looking down – ocean depths are dark blue and it is hard to see the prey – Looking up – bright light is filtered down and it is hard to see the prey Surviving in the Epipelagic - Coloring and Camouflage • Laterally compressed bodies are also common – reduce the size of the silhouette • Silvery sides – reflect light – help to blend in • Vertical bars or irregular patterns – help to break up their outline in the dappled under water light Surviving in the Epipelagic - Swimming • Whether the prey gets away or the predator gets a meal depends on which swims faster • Emphasis is on sheer speed • Epipelagic contains the worlds most powerful swimmers • Practically all epipelagic nekton have streamlined bodies that make swimming easier & more efficient • Do not have features that increase resistance (like spines, bulging eyes) Surviving in the Epipelagic - Swimming • Bodies are firm and muscular • Force is delivered mainly by the tail • The tail is high and narrow • Fins tend to be stiff – provides maneuverability and lift Surviving in the Epipelagic - Swimming • Fishes have two types of muscle – red and white – red muscle gets its color from the high concentration of myoglobin (stores oxygen) • Red muscle – best suited for long sustained effort • White muscle – provides short burst of power Epipelagic Food Webs Epipelagic Food Webs • Of
Recommended publications
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Cruise News Going Deep: Deepwater Exploration of the Marianas by the Okeanos Explorer
    Deep-Sea Life Issue 8, November 2016 Welcome to the eighth edition of Deep-Sea Life: an informal publication about current affairs in the world of deep-sea biology. Once again we have a wealth of contributions from our fellow colleagues to enjoy concerning their current projects, news, meetings, cruises, new publications and so on. The cruise news section is particularly well-endowed this issue which is wonderful to see, with voyages of exploration from four of our five oceans from the Arctic, spanning north east, west, mid and south Atlantic, the north-west Pacific, and the Indian Ocean. Just imagine when all those data are in OBIS via the new deep-sea node…! (see page 24 for more information on this). The photo of the issue makes me smile. Angelika Brandt from the University of Hamburg, has been at sea once more with her happy-looking team! And no wonder they look so pleased with themselves; they have collected a wonderful array of life from one of the very deepest areas of our ocean in order to figure out more about the distribution of these abyssal organisms, and the factors that may limit their distribution within this region. Read more about the mission and their goals on page 5. I always appreciate feedback regarding any aspect of the publication, so that it may be improved as we go forward. Please circulate to your colleagues and students who may have an interest in life in the deep, and have them contact me if they wish to be placed on the mailing list for this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun
    OCEANOGRAPHY – Vol.II - Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, France. Keywords: Algae, allochthonous nutrient, aphotic zone, autochthonous nutrient, Auxotrophs, bacteria, bacterioplankton, benthos, carbon dioxide, carnivory, chelator, chemoautotrophs, ciliates, coastal eutrophication, coccolithophores, convection, crustaceans, cyanobacteria, detritus, diatoms, dinoflagellates, disphotic zone, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic matter (DOM), ecosystem, eukaryotes, euphotic zone, eutrophic, excretion, exoenzymes, exudation, fecal pellet, femtoplankton, fish, fish lavae, flagellates, food web, foraminifers, fungi, harmful algal blooms (HABs), herbivorous food web, herbivory, heterotrophs, holoplankton, ichthyoplankton, irradiance, labile, large planktonic microphages, lysis, macroplankton, marine snow, megaplankton, meroplankton, mesoplankton, metazoan, metazooplankton, microbial food web, microbial loop, microheterotrophs, microplankton, mixotrophs, mollusks, multivorous food web, mutualism, mycoplankton, nanoplankton, nekton, net community production (NCP), neuston, new production, nutrient limitation, nutrient (macro-, micro-, inorganic, organic), oligotrophic, omnivory, osmotrophs, particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic matter (POM), pelagic, phagocytosis, phagotrophs, photoautotorphs, photosynthesis, phytoplankton, phytoplankton bloom, picoplankton, plankton,
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance of Gelatinous Carnivores in the Nekton Community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in Summer 1994
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 141: 139-147, 1996 Published October 3 ' Mar Ecol Prog Ser I Abundance of gelatinous carnivores in the nekton community of the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone in summer 1994 'Alfred-Wegener-Institut fiir Polar- und Meeresforschung. ColumbusstraBe, D-27568 Bremerhaven, Germany 'British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Madingley Road. Cambridge CB3 OET, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The species composition, abundance, vertical distribution, biovolume and carbon content of gelatinous nekton in the Antarctic Polar Frontal Zone are described from a series of RMT25 hauls collected from a series of 200 m depth layers between 0 and 1000 m. In total. 13 species of medusa, 6 species of siphonophore, 3 species of ctenophore and 1 species of salp and nemertean were ~dentified. On average gelatinous organisms contributed 69 3% to the biovolume and 30.3% to the carbon content of the samples, although the ranges were high (0 to 98.9":) and 0 to 62 G"/;,respectively). The most important contributor to the biovolume and carbon content was the scyphomedusan Pel-iphylla peri- phylla. Some specific assoc~ationsand restricted vertlcal d~stl-ibut~ons\vcrc related to trophic interac- tions among ostracods, amphipods and cnidarians. Observations made near South Georgla showed that medusae ancl ctenophores were preyed upon by albatrosses and notothen~oidflsh respectively. The results support the premise that gelatinous organisms are a major and, at tlmes, are the main compo- nent of the oceanic macroplankton/nekton community 111 the Southern Ocean KEY WORDS: Gelatinous nekton Southern Ocean Wet biomass Carbon content. Assemblages INTRODUCTION suspension feeding pelagic tunicates (salps), become dominant (Huntley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Censusing Non-Fish Nekton
    WORKSHOP SYNOPSIS Censusing Non-Fish Nekton Carohln Levi, Gregory Stone and Jerry R. Schubel New England Aquarium ° Boston, Massachusetts USA his is a brief summary of a "Non-Fish SUMMARIES OF WORKING GROUPS Nekton" workshop held on 10-11 December 1997 at the New England Aquarium. The overall goals Cephalopods were: (1) to assess the feasibility of conducting a census New higher-level taxa are yet to be discovered, of life in the sea, (2) to identify the strategies and especially among coleoid cephalopods, which are components of such a census, (3) to assess whether a undergoing rapid evolutionary radiation. There are periodic census would generate scientifically worth- great gaps in natural history and ecosystem function- while results, and (4) to determine the level of interest ing, with even major commercial species largely of the scientific community in participating in the unknown. This is particularly, complex, since these design and conduct of a census of life in the sea. short-lived, rapidly growing animals move up through This workshop focused on "non-fish nekton," which trophic levels in a single season. were defined to include: marine mammals, marine reptiles, cephalopods and "other invertebrates." During . Early consolidation of existing cephalopod data is the course of the workshop, it was suggested that a needed, including the vast literatures in Japanese more appropriate phase for "other invertebrates" is and Russian. Access to and evaluation of historical invertebrate micronekton. Throughout the report we survey, catch, biological and video image data sets have used the latter terminology. and collections is needed. An Internet-based reposi- Birds were omitted only because of lack of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Marine Biodiversity
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292115665 Arctic marine biodiversity CHAPTER · JANUARY 2016 READS 142 12 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Lis Lindal Jørgensen Philippe Archambault Institute of Marine Research in Norway Université du Québec à Rimouski UQAR 36 PUBLICATIONS 285 CITATIONS 137 PUBLICATIONS 1,574 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Dieter Piepenburg Jake Rice Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel Fisheries and Oceans Canada 71 PUBLICATIONS 1,705 CITATIONS 67 PUBLICATIONS 2,279 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Andrey V. Dolgov letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 19 February 2016 Chapter 36G. Arctic Ocean Contributors: Lis Lindal Jørgensen, Philippe Archambault, Claire Armstrong, Andrey Dolgov, Evan Edinger, Tony Gaston, Jon Hildebrand, Dieter Piepenburg, Walker Smith, Cecilie von Quillfeldt, Michael Vecchione, Jake Rice (Lead member) Referees: Arne Bjørge, Charles Hannah. 1. Introduction 1.1 State The Central Arctic Ocean and the marginal seas such as the Chukchi, East Siberian, Laptev, Kara, White, Greenland, Beaufort, and Bering Seas, Baffin Bay and the Canadian Archipelago (Figure 1) are among the least-known basins and bodies of water in the world ocean, because of their remoteness, hostile weather, and the multi-year (i.e., perennial) or seasonal ice cover. Even the well-studied Barents and Norwegian Seas are partly ice covered during winter and information during this period is sparse or lacking. The Arctic has warmed at twice the global rate, with sea- ice loss accelerating (Figure 2, ACIA, 2004; Stroeve et al., 2012, Chapter 46 in this report), especially along the coasts of Russia, Alaska, and the Canadian Archipelago (Post et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Lecture
    ChapterChapter 1 12 Clickers Lecture Essentials of Oceanography Eleventh Edition Marine Life and the Marine Environment Alan P. Trujillo Harold V. Thurman © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Overview • Living organisms, including marine species, are classified by characteristics. • Marine organisms are adapted to the ocean’s physical properties. • The marine environment has distinct divisions. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Classification based on physical characteristics • DNA sequencing allows genetic comparison. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Living and nonliving things made of atoms • Life consumes energy from environment. • NASA’s definition encompasses potential for extraterrestrial life. © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Working definition of life • Living things can – Capture, store, and transmit energy – Reproduce – Adapt to environment – Change over time © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Life • Three domains or superkingdoms • Bacteria – simple life forms without nuclei • Archaea – simple, microscopic creatures • Eukarya – complex, multicellular organisms – Plants and animals – DNA in discrete nucleus © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Living Organisms • Five kingdoms – Monera – Protoctista – Fungi – Plantae – Animalia © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Five Kingdoms of Organisms • Monera – Simplest organisms, single-celled – Cyanobacteria, heterotrophic bacteria, archaea • Protoctista – Single- and multicelled with nucleus –
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No.1839
    FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No 1839 Marine neustbnology by Yu. P. Zaitsev Original title: - Morskaya Neistonologiya From: Marine Neustonology, Academy of Sciences of the . Ukrainian SSR, Kiev, : 5-262 '1970 Translated by the Translation Bureau(P. • Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of Canada Marine Ecology Laboratory Dartmouth, N. S. 1971_ 401 pages typescript , yu, ID. Zaltriev: arine -NoustonoIoGy, '.aukova duka",10v,.19 ri 2i Introduction ....... 1.44 •ed ' y .... .... »,. • Part .one. Peculiarity of ecoloi3ical conditions of th fflost u,pper reGion of the seas and oceans . ...... ;11 Qhapter I. Illumination, temperature and salinity of water..11 Chapter II. NonlivinG oranic matter 17• Chapter rh e Mololcal activity of sea. foam . • . • chapter IV. Enviroament biotic factors .55 ' Chapter V. co1oica1 peculiarity of "the near-surface sca 1 biotope as the cause of delopin speciai biolQe;ical . structure in it • • e• * 4 4, léte•e. •44 , •....42 Part two. :2éthods of neustonolo&ical research • • • . • Chapter VI. npDssibility of usin existin plFÂnton nct models for neustonoloical purooses . .4*;- Chaoter ome principals upon which the workinG out of .,' the method. of col ec 1rç ond studyin e:; sea neuston cre-bas .47 Direction of haulin and the up,it of_quantittiyo - Calculation , A A C C a 3 C AA•CAAC A A * ('s 47 Optimal se.:)ced of haulins by iaeans of a net . 143 I'animusa disturbance in the natural ;.ater stratification': 'and quantity of population in the net haulinÉ, sono . .51 • . Some technical properties of nets considered While • •roducini; gears for haulin hyponeuston .....
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Cruise News E/V Nautilus Telepresence Exploration of the U.S
    Deep-Sea Life Issue 14, January 2020 Welcome to the 14th edition of Deep-Sea Life (a little later than anticipated… such is life). As always there is bound to be something in here for everyone. Illustrated by stunning photography throughout, learn about the deep-water canyons of Lebanon, remote Pacific Island seamounts, deep coral habitats of the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Southeast USA and the North Atlantic (with good, bad and ugly news), first trials of BioCam 3D imaging technology (very clever stuff), new deep pelagic and benthic discoveries from the Bahamas, high-risk explorations under ice in the Arctic (with a spot of astrobiology thrown in), deep-sea fauna sensitivity assessments happening in the UK and a new photo ID guide for mesopelagic fish. Read about new projects to study unexplored areas of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Azores Plateau, plans to develop a water-column exploration programme, and assessment of effects of ice shelf collapse on faunal assemblages in the Antarctic. You may also be interested in ongoing projects to address and respond to governance issues and marine conservation. It’s all here folks! There are also reports from past meetings and workshops related to deep seabed mining, deep-water corals, deep-water sharks and rays and information about upcoming events in 2020. Glance over the many interesting new papers for 2019 you may have missed, the scientist profiles, job and publishing opportunities and the wanted section – please help your colleagues if you can. There are brief updates from the Deep- Ocean Stewardship Initiative and for the deep-sea ecologists amongst you, do browse the Deep-Sea Biology Society president’s letter.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Animal Physiology
    Limnology 1 Weisse - WS99/00 Glossary Limnology 1 Biological Zonation of a lentic System: Most organisms can be classified on the basis of their typical habitat. Benthos: The community of plants and animals that live permanently in or on the sea bottom. Littoral (intertidal zone): The trophogenic zone along the shore till the compensation depth where NPP occurs. It is rich in species diversity and number - especially algae and higher plants. • Epilittoral: Sedentary organisms of the shoreline; e.g. macrophytes, diatoms, etc. • Profundal: Depths of 180m and deeper. Limnion: Temperature related zonation of the open water body of lentic systems; i.e. summer stratification due to solar radiation produces several trophic zones - see also ecological aspects - depth zones. • Epilimnion: The upper warm and illuminated surface layer of a lake; narrower than the trophogenic zone. • Metalimnion: The transitional zone between epi- and hypolimnion; i.e. the zone of the thermocline. • Hypolimnion: The cool and poorly illuminated bottom layer of a lake, below the thermocline. Nekton: Pelagic animals that are active swimmers; i.e. most of the adult fishes. Pelagial: The environment of the open water of a lake, away from the bottom, and not in close proximity to the shoreline. It is Lower in species number and diversity than the benthos. The pelagial of rivers exhibits a directed and continuos flux (spatial relocation = amountH2O/cross-surface area). Plankton: Passively drifting or weakly swimming organisms in fresh waters; i.e. microscopic plants, eggs, larval stages of the nekton and benthos (such as phyto-plankton, zoo-plankton). • Neuston: The epipelagic zone few centimeters below the waterline; i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of the Northeast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonicis
    The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of theNortheast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonids Richard D. Brodeur Bruce C. Mundy William G. Pearcy Robert W. Wisseman The Neustonic Fauna in Coastal Waters of the Northeast Pacific:Abundance, Distribution, and Utilization by Juvenile Salmonicis Richard D. Brodeur William G. Pearcy Bruce C. Mundy Robert W. Wisseman Oregon State University Sea Grant College Program AdS 402 Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Publication No. ORESU-T-87-001 © 1987 by Oregon State University.All rights reserved. AUTHORS Richard 0. Brodeur, senior research assistant, and William G. Pearcy, professor, are with the College of Oceanography at Oregon State University. Bruce C. Mundy works as a fishery biologist at the Honolulu laboratory of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Robert W. Wisseman is a research assistant in the Department of Entomology at Oregon State University. SUPPORT This publication is the result, in part, of research sponsored by Oregon Sea Grant through NOAA Office of Sea Grant, Department of Commerce, under Grant No. NA79AA-D-OO1O (Project No. RICE-jo). The U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon. The Oregon State University Sea Grant College Program is supported cooperatively by the National Oceanic and AtmosphericAdministration, U.S. Department of Commerce, by the state of Oregon, and by participating localgovernments and private industry. ORDERING PUBLICATIONS Copies of this publication are available from Sea Grant Communications Oregon State University AdS MO? Corvallis, OR 97331 Please include author, title, and publication number. Upon request, we will also send a free copy of our catalogue of Oregon State University marine-related puhi ications.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles and Detrital Matter
    Biogeosciences, 7, 2851–2899, 2010 www.biogeosciences.net/7/2851/2010/ Biogeosciences doi:10.5194/bg-7-2851-2010 © Author(s) 2010. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem E. Ramirez-Llodra1, A. Brandt2, R. Danovaro3, B. De Mol4, E. Escobar5, C. R. German6, L. A. Levin7, P. Martinez Arbizu8, L. Menot9, P. Buhl-Mortensen10, B. E. Narayanaswamy11, C. R. Smith12, D. P. Tittensor13, P. A. Tyler14, A. Vanreusel15, and M. Vecchione16 1Institut de Ciencies` del Mar, CSIC. Passeig Mar´ıtim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain 2Biocentrum Grindel and Zoological Museum, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany 3Department of Marine Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy 4GRC Geociencies` Marines, Parc Cient´ıfic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Adolf Florensa 8, 08028 Barcelona, Spain 5Universidad Nacional Autonoma´ de Mexico,´ Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnolog´ıa, A.P. 70-305 Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico,` Mexico´ 6Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MS #24, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 7Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 92093-0218, USA 8Deutsches Zentrum fur¨ Marine Biodiversitatsforschung,¨ Sudstrand¨ 44, 26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany 9Ifremer Brest, DEEP/LEP, BP 70, 29280 Plouzane, France 10Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870, Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway 11Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban,
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Life • There Are More Than 250,000 Identified Marine Species
    Marine Life • There are more than 250,000 identified marine species. • Most live in sunlit surface seawater. Think about it…. What zone of the ocean would you expect most life to live in??? © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Marine Life • A species’ success depends on the ability to – find food, – avoid predation, – reproduce, and – cope with physical barriers to movement. • Marine organisms are adapted to the ocean’s physical properties. © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Classification of Marine Organisms • Plankton (floaters) • Nekton (swimmers) • Benthos (bottom dwellers) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Plankton • Organisms that live in large bodies of water and are unable to swim against the current. • Include bacteria, archaea, algae, protozoa and small floating animals • Defined by niche not taxonomy *Most biomass on Earth consists of plankton. © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Types of Plankton • Phytoplankton – Autotrophic – Makes own food (photosynthesis, or chemosynthesis • Zooplankton – Heterotrophic – Gets energy from eating things © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Nekton • Independent swimmers • Most adult fish and squid • Marine mammals • Marine reptiles © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Nekton © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Benthos • Epifauna live on the surface of the sea floor. • Infauna live buried in sediments. • Benthos are most abundant in shallower water. • Many live in perpetual darkness, coldness, and stillness. © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Benthos © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Life Cycle of a Squid © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Adaptations of Marine Organisms • The marine environment is more stable than land. • Organisms in the ocean are less able to withstand environmental changes. • Marine animals do not risk desiccation. © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Adaptations of Marine Organisms • Physical support – Buoyancy – How to resist sinking – Different support structures in cold (fewer) rather than warm (more appendages) seawater – Smaller size © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]